Lisa Frank's Side of the Story - Glamour Dolls Makeup x Lisa Frank PART 2| Behind the Controversy
-
Not SyncedGlamour Dolls failed to comply with
-
Not Syncedthose obligations when it engaged in a
-
Not Syncedfailed online advertising campaign on
-
Not SyncedKickstarter, using LFI, Lisa Frank's brand
-
Not Syncedwithout LFI's approval and then refused to
-
Not Syncedpay royalties due when LFI properly
-
Not Syncedterminated the party's contracts as a
-
Not Syncedresult of Glamour Dolls' misconduct.
-
Not SyncedWait a minute. She didn't know about the
-
Not SyncedKickstarter? Hello my friend, I will
-
Not Syncedhonestly tell you that until late last
-
Not Syncednight, I did not think that I was filming
-
Not Synceda video about Lisa Frank and Glamour
-
Not SyncedDolls today. I actually had a full video
-
Not Syncedplanned about preservative-free cosmetics
-
Not Syncedand how freaking ridiculous and dangerous
-
Not Syncedpreservative-free cosmetics are. But then
-
Not SyncedI got a very interesting comment from a
-
Not Syncedperson named "Fake Goth Girl." Okay. I get
-
Not Synceda link. The link is to a court document
-
Not Syncedthat I had not previously had access to.
-
Not SyncedThis document is Lisa Frank's point of
-
Not Syncedview. It is her counter suit. This is Lisa
-
Not SyncedFrank saying "Glamour Dolls is the bad
-
Not Syncedguy, not me. I didn't do anything wrong -
-
Not Syncedthey're the ones that did something
-
Not Syncedwrong." So in today's video, I want to go
-
Not Syncedover Lisa's side of things - what she says
-
Not Syncedin the court documents is the reason why
-
Not Syncedshe pulled out of her contract with
-
Not SyncedGlamour Dolls that left backers of the
-
Not SyncedKickstarter out all of their money - over
-
Not Synced$400,000 of their money, including my
-
Not Syncedmoney. My $75? Gone. If you have no idea
-
Not Syncedwhat I'm talking about, that's because
-
Not Syncedthis is Part 2. I strongly strongly
-
Not Syncedsuggest you please watch Part 1 of this.
-
Not SyncedIt will be linked below. It will be up in
-
Not Synceda card. It is the background for this
-
Not Syncedvideo - this video might not make sense
-
Not Syncedif you don't watch that one first. If you
-
Not Synceddon't feel like you have time for an hour
-
Not Syncedand a half long video, what you can do is
-
Not Syncedyou can scrub through the timestamps, kind
-
Not Syncedof get the idea of what it is. You can
-
Not Syncedalso play it on 1.5 speed if you want to.
-
Not SyncedAnd I will tell you that the average
-
Not Syncedamount of watch time on that video for a
-
Not Syncedsingle view is about 40 minutes. That has
-
Not Syncedliterally never happened on my channel.
-
Not SyncedThis is a story that I think you want to
-
Not Syncedhear and and that I think that you are
-
Not Syncedgoing to be engaged in if you choose to.
-
Not SyncedThat being said, we are starting at Part
-
Not Synced2. I'm assuming at this point that you
-
Not Syncedhave seen that video and that you have
-
Not Syncedthat background knowledge. And also,
-
Not Syncedside note, I mentioned this at the end of
-
Not Syncedthe video, but there's probably about 40
-
Not Syncedcomments mentioning Bailey Sarian's video
-
Not Syncedon Lisa Frank, based on the Jezebel
-
Not Syncedarticle that we talked about in the first
-
Not Syncedpart of this. Yes, I am fully aware of
-
Not SyncedBailey's video. I have met Bailey. I have
-
Not Syncedcollaborated with Bailey. Bailey did a
-
Not Syncedfantastic job on that video. That video is
-
Not Syncedmore about Lisa Frank as a person, so if
-
Not Syncedyou want even more context for the story,
-
Not SyncedI highly recommend you go watch Bailey's
-
Not Syncedvideo as well. What we're gonna do with
-
Not Syncedthis part is I'm actually gonna put Lisa
-
Not SyncedFrank's lawsuit on the side of me so if
-
Not Syncedyou are fluent in Legalese, you can follow
-
Not Syncedalong and see the match up of what I'm
-
Not Syncedsaying. Surprisingly, a lot of is is
-
Not Syncedpretty clear cut and there isn't a ton of
-
Not Syncedlawyer language in this that was difficult
-
Not Syncedto understand. So if you would like to
-
Not Syncedread along, it is going to be next to me
-
Not Syncedover here. Here we go. So this is what
-
Not SyncedLisa says. This is her side of things.
-
Not SyncedThis is all about the deal in 2016, the
-
Not Syncedoriginal deal that she had. Lisa says they
-
Not Syncedstruck the deal in June of 2016 that would
-
Not Syncedend on December 31st of 2017 - that
-
Not Syncedmatches up with Glamour Dolls' side, so
-
Not SyncedI'm assuming there's legal contracts, so
-
Not Syncedthere's evidence of this. So Glamour Dolls
-
Not Syncedin that original contract, agreed to pay
-
Not SyncedLisa Frank 15% royalty on the net sales
-
Not Syncedof the products made under the deal, with
-
Not Synceda minimum payment of $100,000 for the
-
Not Syncedduration of the agreement, including a
-
Not Synced$25,000 advance. Glamour Dolls promised to
-
Not Synceddo their best, to make, sell, promote, and
-
Not Syncedmarket the products to get as many sales
-
Not Syncedas possible, always focusing on high
-
Not Syncedquality. Now this part is very very
-
Not Syncedimportant because this is really the root
-
Not Syncedof why everything went wrong. They had to
-
Not Syncedget Lisa Frank's approval on literally
-
Not Syncedeverything, from the design concepts to
-
Not Syncedthe artwork, to the molds for production,
-
Not Syncedto the final product samples before going
-
Not Syncedinto production. Lisa Frank had the right
-
Not Syncedto approve or reject the elements and
-
Not SyncedGlamour Dolls had to follow Lisa Frank's
-
Not Synceddirections on quality standards. Now
-
Not Syncedlisten to this because this is part of the
-
Not Syncedreason why things were taking so long. So,
-
Not Syncedfor designs, Glamour Dolls had to wait up
-
Not Syncedto 10 business days - that's about two
-
Not Syncedweeks or so - for Lisa Frank to approve
-
Not Syncedor reject anything that they submitted to
-
Not Syncedher. If Lisa didn't respond in time,
-
Not SyncedGlamour Dolls was allowed to ask after
-
Not Syncedthose 10 business days, "Hey, what's going
-
Not Syncedon? I need a full description of why you
-
Not Syncedreject this or I need an approval." But
-
Not Syncedthis is the kicker! Because even after
-
Not Syncedapproval, and remember, this is according
-
Not Syncedto Lisa herself, Lisa could stop the
-
Not Syncedproduction and distribution of the
-
Not Syncedproducts if they didn't meet her quality
-
Not Syncedstandards. That's a subjective thing -
-
Not Syncedthat is not something that can be
-
Not Syncedmeasured. Lisa can just for any reason,
-
Not Syncedjust say "This doesn't meet my quality
-
Not Syncedstandards" and stop production at any
-
Not Syncedpoint. And it wasn't just for production
-
Not Syncedof product. It also had to do with
-
Not Syncedadvertising, packaging, display methods,
-
Not Syncedpress releases - anything using Lisa Frank
-
Not Syncedartwork - Glamour Dolls had to run this by
-
Not SyncedLisa. They had to wait for those 10
-
Not Syncedbusiness days and then if she didn't
-
Not Syncedrespond in 10 business days, then they had
-
Not Syncedto poke her about it and be like "Dude,
-
Not Syncedwhat's going on?" They had to keep poking
-
Not Syncedher if she didn't respond after those 10
-
Not Syncedbusiness days. So remember this original
-
Not Syncedcontract that I personally believe was to
-
Not Syncedcreate the blush, the highlighter, and the
-
Not Syncedtwo brushes - that contract was ending
-
Not Syncedin December. But remember the Kickstarter
-
Not Syncedhad started in February. We're now in
-
Not SyncedDecember. February - they promised backers
-
Not Synced10 additional products beyond these four
-
Not Syncedthat had already been funded. Lisa's
-
Not Syncedcontract is about to end, so they need to
-
Not Syncedstart a new contract. This is what Lisa
-
Not Syncedsays was in the new contract: same 15%
-
Not Syncedroyalty on the net sales of the products
-
Not Syncedplus 20% royalty on sales made directly to
-
Not Syncedretail customers. So this would be if
-
Not Syncedpeople bought it off of Ipsy's marketplace
-
Not Syncedor if people bought it from Hot Topic,
-
Not Syncedor at one point they were talking to
-
Not SyncedWalmart - any of those, Lisa would get a
-
Not Synced20% royalty off of. Beyond that, in the
-
Not Syncedfirst contract, Lisa asked for at least
-
Not Synced$100,000 for her fees. In the new
-
Not Syncedcontract, Lisa upped that to $500,000.
-
Not SyncedThat included an up front payment of
-
Not Synced$125,000 that needed to be paid when the
-
Not Syncedcontract was signed. Three more payments
-
Not Syncedwould be paid throughout the year to total
-
Not Syncedthat $500,000. The rules for making the
-
Not Syncedproducts were pretty much the same as the
-
Not Syncedfirst contract. All of the levels of "you
-
Not Syncedneed to send it to Lisa and she needs to
-
Not Syncedapprove it" and then the 10 business days
-
Not Synced- all of that was pretty much the same.
-
Not SyncedThe only thing that changed, which we'll
-
Not Syncedfind out more about in just a minute, is
-
Not Syncedthat they did not have to get pre-shipment
-
Not Syncedapproval. So Lisa has already approved
-
Not Syncedthe final draft of the product, they have
-
Not Syncedput that into production, they now have
-
Not Syncedthe products - they've got thousands and
-
Not Syncedthousands of these products - they don't
-
Not Syncedhave to send those products to Lisa for
-
Not Syncedapproval anymore. But there is a clause -
-
Not Syncedbecause of course there is - if there were
-
Not Syncedany production problems, if after all of
-
Not Syncedthese things were sent out and Lisa
-
Not Synceddecided that there was a production
-
Not Syncedproblem, there was something she didn't
-
Not Syncedlike, Glamour Dolls would have to pay
-
Not Synceddamages for that. What would those
-
Not Synceddamages be? I have no idea, it's not in
-
Not Syncedhere. Another thing that's very important
-
Not Syncedin Lisa's side of the story is that they
-
Not Syncedsaid that Lisa could end the deal
-
Not Syncedimmediately if Glamour Dolls broke certain
-
Not Syncedrules, like not following the approval
-
Not Syncedprocess or having production issues 3
-
Not Syncedtimes. If Lisa decided that she was
-
Not Syncedgoing to terminate the agreement, Glamour
-
Not SyncedDolls had to not only stop making
-
Not Syncedproducts, they had to stop selling their
-
Not Syncedexisting products. Then they had to turn
-
Not Syncedover the rights to the artwork. Anything
-
Not Syncedthat Lisa had created for Glamour Dolls
-
Not Syncedwould now be owned by Lisa. And you might
-
Not Syncedbe seeing where this might be going -
-
Not Syncedmaybe if you watched part 1. Because she
-
Not Synceddid that. That happened. In context. you
-
Not Syncedhave to remember that this is 3 months
-
Not Syncedpast the date that Glamour Dolls had
-
Not Syncedpromised products would be done and
-
Not Syncedshipped to backers. So they are deep deep
-
Not Syncedin it now. They are sending out that
-
Not Synceddigital Christmas card, where people can
-
Not Syncedsend it to their families, saying "Hey,
-
Not Syncedyou know, you might be getting some Lisa
-
Not SyncedFrank products that I bought for you at
-
Not Syncedsome point. This is what's coming." That's
-
Not Syncedwhere we're at. A lot of the backers are
-
Not Syncedalready irritated by this point. From
-
Not SyncedLisa's side, she says in her court
-
Not Synceddocuments that LFI, or Lisa Frank
-
Not SyncedIncorporated, fully performed its
-
Not Syncedobligations under the license agreements -
-
Not SyncedI do believe Glamour Dolls would argue
-
Not Syncedagainst that. They say specifically
-
Not SyncedGlamour Dolls repeatedly failed to meet
-
Not Syncedtheir responsibilities under the agreemnts
-
Not Syncedthey had with Lisa Frank. This is how Lisa
-
Not Syncedsays Glamour Dolls messed up. And
-
Not Syncedremember, she's going to have to prove
-
Not Syncedthis for her counter suit. This is what
-
Not Syncedshe says - she says they didn't put in
-
Not Syncedenough effort to produce, distribute,
-
Not Syncedpromote, and sell the products that they
-
Not Syncedwere supposed to. She says that they
-
Not Synceddidn't aim to sell as many high quality
-
Not Syncedproducts as they could, that they had
-
Not Syncedsigned off in their contract. She says
that -
Not Syncedthey use Lisa Frank artwork in ads and
-
Not Syncedpackaging without getting approval first,
-
Not Syncedwhich was against their rules of the
-
Not Syncedcontract. She says Glamour Dolls was late
-
Not Syncedin making and delivering the products,
-
Not Syncedwhich they were. She says that Glamour
-
Not SyncedDolls didn't follow the agreed upon
-
Not Syncedprocess for getting products inspected
-
Not Syncedand approved, that they didn't pay the
-
Not Syncedroyalties and the minimum amounts that
-
Not Syncedthey were supposed to, and that they used
-
Not Syncedthe Kickstarter to sell products without
-
Not Syncedgetting the okay from Lisa Frank
-
Not SyncedIncorporated, which was of course not
-
Not Syncedallowed. Finally, they say that Glamour
-
Not SyncedDolls promised products to backers and
-
Not Syncedthen never shipped them out, which is
-
Not Syncedtrue. But the question is: why didn't they
-
Not Syncedship them out? What was stopping them
-
Not Syncedfrom doing it? Was it a fault of Glamour
-
Not SyncedDolls or was it a fault of Lisa? We're
-
Not Syncedstill in Lisa's perspective, so let's
-
Not Syncedfollow that. Lisa says that even through
-
Not Syncedall of the things that I just listed - the
-
Not Syncedthings that are in Lisa's filing - she
-
Not Syncedcontinued to try to work with Glamour
-
Not SyncedDolls to make things work. She says she
-
Not Synceddid this only because she felt like, if
-
Not Syncedshe didn't continue with Glamour Dolls and
-
Not Syncedsee this through and get the backers what
-
Not Syncedthey ordered, that it would damage Lisa
-
Not SyncedFrank. It would damage her and her brand.
-
Not SyncedIt wasn't about making sure that people
-
Not Syncedgot what they paid for, it was about the
-
Not Synceddamage it would cause to her reputation
-
Not Syncedand her brand's reputation. She says in
-
Not Syncedher statement that, you know, that Glamour
-
Not SyncedDolls had made all these promises and
-
Not Syncedthey failed to go through on them, that
-
Not Syncedthey even said that they were shipping
-
Not Syncedthings to people that they never shipped
-
Not Syncedto them, which I don't know if it's
-
Not Syncedactually true. Because from what I've
-
Not Syncedseen, anybody that was supposed to get
-
Not Syncedthe eyeshadow and the bronzer and the
-
Not Syncedpostcard did get those things. There is
-
Not Syncedsome question, at least in the comments
-
Not Syncedunderneath my last video of whether people
-
Not Syncedwho ordered the brush separately, whether
-
Not Syncedthey actually got their brush. So maybe
-
Not Syncedthat's what Lisa is talking about. Lisa
-
Not Syncedsays that Glamour Dolls ignored rules
-
Not Syncedthat they had to follow to get Lisa's
-
Not Syncedapproval before making anything. She says
-
Not Syncedthat they attempted to make or change
-
Not Syncedproducts without talking to her first.
-
Not SyncedAnd also that they didn't give her the
-
Not Syncedsamples required that she needed to
-
Not Syncedreview. The perspective here is that
-
Not Syncedbecause of those failures, people started
-
Not Syncedblaming Lisa Frank and not Glamour Dolls,
-
Not Syncedwhere she's saying it wasn't her fault,
-
Not Syncedit was Glamour Dolls' fault. She said that
-
Not Syncedpeople began to think that Lisa Frank was
-
Not Syncedscamming them, leaving negative comments
-
Not Syncedand complaints online that damaged LFI's
-
Not Syncedreputation. It was only because Glamour
-
Not SyncedDolls broke their side of the contract
-
Not Syncedso many times that she ended the contract
-
Not Syncedformally in July of 2018, which is what
-
Not SyncedGlamour Dolls had said, that she abruptly
-
Not Syncedjust ended the contract. What Glamour
-
Not SyncedDolls had said was before she ended the
-
Not Syncedcontract, she required them to pay that
-
Not Syncedfinal $125,000 to her and then once she
-
Not Syncedgot the money, she terminated the contract
-
Not Syncedand that they didn't know she was going to
-
Not Synceddo that when she took the money.
-
Not SyncedSupposedly, LFI reminded Glamour Dolls
-
Not Syncedthat they needed to do the things that
-
Not Syncedwere in the contract, that if she ended
-
Not Syncedit, that they needed to do - things like
-
Not Syncedreturning all the artwork and paying any
-
Not Syncedroyalties owed. However, she says Glamour
-
Not SyncedDolls didn't pay what they owed or follow
-
Not Syncedthrough on other responsibilities after
-
Not Syncedthe termination, leading to more problems
-
Not Syncedand losses for LFI. So at the final part
-
Not Syncedof the complaint, Lisa says "This is what
-
Not SyncedI want the court to give me." She says she
-
Not Syncedwants to be paid damages, which means all
-
Not Syncedof the money that they should have
-
Not Syncedreceived under the agreements with Glamour
-
Not SyncedDolls - the exact amount of how much she
-
Not Syncedshould be paid would be decided at trial.
-
Not SyncedThen she wants to be paid back for all of
-
Not Syncedthe costs and all of the expenses and the
-
Not Syncedlawyer's fees as allowed by law. She also
-
Not Syncedwants to receive interest on any money
-
Not Syncedawarded to them, both before and after the
-
Not Syncedcourt's decision at 18% per year and it
-
Not Syncedlooks like, you know, this happened in
-
Not Synced2018, it's now 2024, so that's a lot of
-
Not Syncedfreakin' interest. I'm not going to do the
-
Not Syncedmath in my brain right now because it's
-
Not Syncedphysically and mentally impossible for me
-
Not Syncedbut that's a lot of money. And finally,
-
Not Syncedshe's like "And if the court wants to
-
Not Syncedgive me something else, if you think
-
Not Syncedthere's something else that's fair, feel
-
Not Syncedfree. You can give me that too." So that
-
Not Syncedis Lisa's filing. I have lots of thoughts
-
Not Syncedmy friend. Do you have thoughts? Because
-
Not Syncedif you have thoughts, put 'em in the
-
Not Syncedcomment section because I'm wondering if
-
Not Syncedwe have the exact same thoughts. That's
-
Not Syncedwhat the collective brain is all about, is
-
Not Syncedus bouning ideas off of each other and in
-
Not Synceda recorded video, it's a little harder. So
-
Not Syncedif you have thoughts, definitely leave
-
Not Syncedthem in the comments. I'm gonna tell you
-
Not Syncedmine. Okay, so I have questions. [laughs]
-
Not SyncedI have 3 major questions. The first one is
-
Not Synced"What was the timeline for approving the
-
Not SyncedKickstarter?" Because eventually, Lisa was
-
Not Syncedparticipating in the Kickstarter, at least
-
Not Syncedit looks like she was participating in the
-
Not SyncedKickstarter. So I am curious what Glamour
-
Not SyncedDolls' side of this is, in that do they
-
Not Syncedsay that they did the Kickstarter without
-
Not Syncedtalking to Lisa? Because I noticed
-
Not Syncedsomething that was in their paperwork that
-
Not Syncedthey filed. They label Kickstarter as a
-
Not Syncedbusiness that they were trying to get to
-
Not Syncedwork with, right? So it's listed in with
-
Not SyncedIpsy and Hot Topic; they also list
-
Not SyncedKickstarter. So it was seen by them - it
-
Not Syncedlooks like - as just another way to sell
-
Not Syncedproducts and I don't know if that was in
-
Not Syncedthe contract, that they had to clear what
-
Not Syncedretailers they were gonna work with with
-
Not SyncedLisa. Where I think that Lisa may have
-
Not Syncedthem on this is that they had to use Lisa
-
Not SyncedFrank artwork and they had to promote this
-
Not Syncedusing Lisa Frank branded stuff for the
-
Not SyncedKickstarter before it even started.
-
Not SyncedRemember Candy's video. I wish I could
-
Not Syncedshow you the video - it is killing me that
-
Not Syncedthis video is private and I can't show
-
Not Syncedyou the full video. But Candy clearly
-
Not Synceduses Lisa Frank artwork in the video to
-
Not Syncedpromote this Kickstarter. If Lisa didn't
-
Not Syncedknow about the Kickstarter, then she
-
Not Synceddidn't approve the artwork to be used in
-
Not SyncedCandy's video or any other promotional
-
Not Syncedthings that they did for the Kickstarter.
-
Not SyncedSo then Lisa would have them on that.
-
Not SyncedThat's what I'm thinking most likely
-
Not Syncedhappened - I mean of course it's possible
-
Not Syncedthat Glamour Dolls did talk to Lisa and
-
Not Syncedtell her about the Kickstarter beforehand
-
Not Syncedand did get all of the artwork approved
-
Not Syncedand all of that, but it sounds like Lisa
-
Not Syncedis saying "No, that didn't happen." So
-
Not Syncedmy next question associated with that -
-
Not Syncedit's kind of a sub question to question
-
Not Syncednumber 1 - is "When did Lisa find out
-
Not Syncedabout the 10 products that they promised
-
Not Syncedto the Kickstarter backers? When did she
-
Not Syncedagree to that?" Because it seems like that
-
Not Syncedfirst contract from 2016 was really for
-
Not Syncedthose 4 products that they actually did
-
Not Syncedproduce and put out there - the blush
-
Not Syncedbrush, the crease brush, the bronzer, and
-
Not Syncedthe eyeshadows. Single eyeshadows, not
-
Not Syncedeyeshadow palettes, the single eyeshadows.
-
Not SyncedThe ones that were sold at Hot Topic. It
-
Not Syncedis very very likely that Lisa was on board
-
Not Syncedwith the Kickstarter about a month after
-
Not Syncedthe Kickstarter started because in March,
-
Not Syncedthey show posts that are specifically from
-
Not SyncedLisa, participating in encouraging people
-
Not Syncedto enter these contests, to perform these
-
Not Syncedtasks, to show their nail looks and things
-
Not Syncedlike that. Lisa is posting there. So if
-
Not Syncedthis is really Lisa posting - which it
-
Not Synceddoesn't really make any sense to me that
-
Not Syncedit wouldn't be Lisa because Glamour Dolls
-
Not Syncedwouldn't be able to, like, hide that from
-
Not SyncedLisa - they would have to explain that
-
Not Syncedso it doesn't really make sense to me
-
Not Syncedthat that wasn't actually Lisa posting.
-
Not SyncedBut she was clearly participating and
-
Not Syncedon board in March. Another clue that Lisa
-
Not Syncedwas involved in the Kickstarter from the
-
Not Syncedlaunch of the Kickstarter was that just
-
Not Synceda few days after the launch, Glamour
-
Not SyncedDolls posted that Lisa was going to go
-
Not Syncedinto her vault and the first 1,000 backers
-
Not Syncedwere going to get a very special gift
-
Not Syncedfrom Lisa in their box when they got their
-
Not Syncedstuff. They would get a second - what they
-
Not Syncedcalled a treat - if they hit 2,000 backers
-
Not Syncedand that Lisa had something really special
-
Not Syncedplanned if they made it to 10,000 backers.
-
Not SyncedSo I'm very curious to see if this piece
-
Not Syncedcomes out in court. My second question is
-
Not Synced"Why the hell did Glamour Dolls sign this
-
Not Syncedterrible ass contract?" This is the most
-
Not Syncedbull**** contract I think I have ever
-
Not Syncedread. It is absolutely nuts. The part that
-
Not Syncedis the most unbelievable for me is that
-
Not SyncedGlamour Dolls signed this is the whole
-
Not Syncedapproval process. It is absolutely
-
Not Syncedridiculous. Both sides agree that this was
-
Not Syncedthe process. So they have an idea, right?
-
Not SyncedThey start with the idea. Let's use the
-
Not SyncedTrapper Keeper palettes as an example.
-
Not SyncedSo they have an idea that they want to
-
Not Syncedcreate a palette that looks like a Trapper
-
Not SyncedKeeper. So they get this plain white
-
Not SyncedTrapper Keeper palette made by the
-
Not Syncedfactory. Glamour Dolls then takes this
-
Not Syncedwhite packaging, this plain plastic
-
Not Syncedpackaging that's the mock-up, send it to
-
Not SyncedLisa, wait 10 business days. If she
-
Not Synceddoesn't answer, they have to poke her and
-
Not Syncedget her to give feedback. If she does
-
Not Syncedapprove of it, Glamour Dolls then takes
-
Not Syncedher ideas, whatever she wants changed, and
-
Not Syncedlets the manufacturing facility know. Then
-
Not Syncedthey get another mock-up. Then they send
-
Not Syncedthat to Lisa. They wait 10 days, they wait
-
Not Syncedfor the feedback. All of that happens all
-
Not Syncedover again until Lisa's happy. I didn't
-
Not Syncedsee anything on either said that said Lisa
-
Not Syncedhad a limit to how many changes she could
-
Not Syncedmake. So let's assume she's now approved
-
Not Syncedthe mold. Now they have to wait for Lisa
-
Not Syncedto make the artwork. Once the artwork
-
Not Syncedcomes in, again, they send it over to the
-
Not Syncedmanufacturer. The manufacturer puts it on
-
Not Syncedthe product. Then Glamour Dolls has to
-
Not Syncedhave two samples of it that they then send
-
Not Syncedover to Lisa and wait those 10 business
-
Not Synceddays again. If she doesn't respond, then
-
Not Syncedthey poke her - same process all over
-
Not Syncedagain, where she can either reject it or
-
Not Syncedaccept it. Do you see how this is so
-
Not Syncedfreaking ridiculous? Because it's not even
-
Not Syncedover then! Even after Lisa has approved
-
Not Syncedthe final designed product, when they
-
Not Syncedmanufacture it - let's say they make
-
Not Synced10,000 of them, because this did happen -
-
Not Syncedthey make 10,000 of them, they have to
-
Not Syncedsend 2 of the 10,000 to Lisa for final
-
Not Syncedapproval before they can ship those out
-
Not Syncedto customers. And I will tell you my
-
Not Syncedfriend, this actually happened -
-
Not Syncedaccording to Glamour Dolls - with the
-
Not Syncedvegan leather makeup bag. This is the
-
Not Synceddraft picture of the vegan leather makeup
-
Not Syncedbag that was not designed, that people
-
Not Syncedreally excited about. This is the final
-
Not Synceddesign that was supposedly "The One," the
-
Not Syncedmakeup bag. Well it turns out, according
-
Not Syncedto Glamour Dolls, Lisa didn't like this
-
Not Syncedand after they had printed 10,000 of
-
Not Syncedthese, Lisa said she didn't want it to be
-
Not Syncedvegan leather anymore; she wanted it to
-
Not Syncedbe glitter plastic. And because of the
-
Not Syncedsh**** ass contract that they signed,
-
Not Syncedthey couldn't sell those 10,000 bags that
-
Not Syncedthey had already made because she had
-
Not Syncedapproved the sample. They had to start all
-
Not Syncedover again with a glitter bag design. I
-
Not Syncedmean how f***ing ridiculous is this? The
-
Not Syncedfact that Glamour Dolls signed this
-
Not Syncedcontract, did they not have a lawyer
-
Not Syncedread it? Like what happened? How did this
-
Not Syncedget through? From the very jump, this
-
Not Syncedshould have just never happened and I'm
-
Not Syncedsure Glamour Dolls in hindsight is
-
Not Syncedthinking the exact same thing. And my
-
Not Syncedthird question is "Why would they start a
-
Not SyncedKickstarter in February, knowing that
-
Not SyncedLisa's contract was ending in December?"
-
Not SyncedBecause that's where they really got
-
Not Syncedscrewed. This is what I'm thinking: I'm
-
Not Syncedthinking Lisa designed all of the products
-
Not Syncedand got everything going for those first
-
Not Syncedfour products before the Kickstarter
-
Not Syncedeven started. And that was why Glamour
-
Not SyncedDolls wanted to do more work with her.
-
Not SyncedThey were like "Yes, this was so smooth,
-
Not Syncedthis was so easy. Let's keep this going a
-
Not Syncedlittle longer. We have until December,
-
Not Syncedit's only February. We have all this time.
-
Not SyncedWe pushed out those four products pretty
-
Not Syncedquickly as far as getting through this
-
Not Syncedprocess, so let's do 10 more! We've got
-
Not Syncedthis." Glamour Dolls said publicly that
-
Not Syncedthey didn't start having problems with
-
Not SyncedLisa slowing down the process until June
-
Not Syncedof 2017. So that was after the Kickstarter
-
Not Syncedhad already started, but before the
-
Not Syncedestimated ship date that they told the
-
Not Syncedbackers of September. And it makes sense
-
Not Syncedbecause if they started signing the
-
Not Syncedcontract in June of 2016, by February,
-
Not Syncedthey had made and designed 4 products.
-
Not SyncedAssuming that Lisa was done with all of
-
Not Syncedthe designs and all of the things and all
-
Not Syncedof the approvals by the time that the
-
Not SyncedKickstarter started so that's about 8
-
Not Syncedmonths. So they're thinking "Well yeah
-
Not Syncedthis was so easy, we should be able to
-
Not Syncedpush out more products by December, by
-
Not Syncedthe time Lisa's contract ends." So now I
-
Not Syncedshall present to you the worst case
-
Not Syncedscenario of Lisa's a raging b****.
-
Not Synced[laughter] That's where we're gonna go
-
Not Syncedwith this. This is worst case scenario
-
Not Syncedwhat happened, in that Lisa knew her
-
Not Syncedcontract was ending in December, she knew
-
Not Syncedthat she could slow down this process in
-
Not Syncedorder to get a new contract in December
-
Not Syncedand price gauge the hell out of Glamour
-
Not SyncedDolls. She knew that they had already
-
Not Syncedpromised all of these products to the
-
Not Syncedbackers. She knew that they probably
-
Not Syncedgiven her $125,000 of the backers' money.
-
Not SyncedShe knew that Glamour Dolls was already
-
Not Syncedusing the backer money in order to get
-
Not Syncedthese samples and ship them to her. The
-
Not Synced$370,000 that the backers had paid,
-
Not Syncedprobably a lot of it was already spent
-
Not Syncedbecause that's why they started wanting -
-
Not Syncedneeding more money. They started selling
-
Not Syncedthe products on BackerKit, they started
-
Not Syncedselling the crease brush on their website,
-
Not Syncedthey really started courting Hot Topic to
-
Not Syncedtry to sell products over there because
-
Not SyncedLisa was taking all of the Kickstarter
-
Not Syncedbackers' money for herself and they were
-
Not Syncedusing it for the manufacturing of these
-
Not Syncedproducts and they knew it wasn't enough to
-
Not Syncedsee this whole project through because
-
Not Syncedremember they've got 10 products they're
-
Not Syncedtrying to make by December. So time
-
Not Syncedpasses, Lisa drags this out, drags this
-
Not Syncedout, and then drops the bomb on Glamour
-
Not SyncedDolls: "If you want this to continue,
-
Not Syncedafter all this money that you spent,
-
Not Syncedyou're gonna have to pay me $500,000, not
-
Not Synced$100,000 anymore. It's $500,000 and you
-
Not Syncedknow when you sell to Hot Topic? You're
-
Not Syncednot gonna give me 15%, you're gonna give
-
Not Syncedme 20%." But at that point, they were so
-
Not Syncedfar deep in it that they couldn't get out
-
Not Syncedof it. They absolutely couldn't get out
-
Not Syncedof it. Another place that they probably
-
Not Syncedspent the backers' money was on Wengie
-
Not Syncedbecause remember the call that Peter did
-
Not Syncedwith the backers? He mentions very
-
Not Syncedbriefly paying for a video. I'll play that
-
Not Syncedfor you.
-
Not Synced(Peter): We actually didn't make a profit
-
Not Syncedoff of this Kickstarter campaign. I know
-
Not Syncedthat's, um, it's a hard thing for people
-
Not Syncedto, um, to kind of believe with the size
-
Not Syncedof it. But, um, we have to manufacture all
-
Not Syncedthose goods, uh, we have licensing fees
-
Not Syncedto pay to Lisa, um, we had to pay for, you
-
Not Syncedknow, uh, for production of the video and
-
Not Syncedfor all these different things.
-
Not Synced(Jen) I don't know this for a fact but
-
Not SyncedI think he took the money from the backers
-
Not Syncedand paid Wengie to make that video.
-
Not SyncedWho knows how much he paid her because
-
Not Syncedinfluencer rates back then, you know, it
-
Not Syncedwas brand new, you know, influencers
-
Not Syncedgetting paid for sponsored videos and
-
Not Syncedthings like that. I have no idea how much
-
Not Syncedthey paid Wengie but I would imagine that
-
Not Syncedwas part of where the money was going and
-
Not Syncedwhy they needed to raise more money.
-
Not SyncedBecause now in December, they not only
-
Not Syncedhave to get all of these 10 products
-
Not Syncedmanufactured but they also have to pay
-
Not SyncedLisa this $500,000. Lisa officially had
-
Not SyncedGlamour Dolls by the unicorn balls. I mean
-
Not Syncedlike, she was-she had them. They had no
-
Not Syncedchoice, in my opinion,
- Title:
- Lisa Frank's Side of the Story - Glamour Dolls Makeup x Lisa Frank PART 2| Behind the Controversy
- Description:
-
This is a story of deception, greed, lies, manipulation, and .... unicorns. Today on PART 2 of Behind the Controversy Lisa Frank x Glamour Dolls Makeup, we take a look at Lisa Frank's side of the story through her COUNTERSUIT against Glamour Dolls. What does SHE say Glamour Dolls did to make her back out of their contract and what she STILL thinks Glamour Dolls owes her! Let's talk about it!
PLEASE watch Part 1 first or this video might be confusing: https://youtu.be/1_1ORHKNPLM
@BaileySarian 's Dark History episode on Lisa Frank. She focuses more on Lisa herself, the Jezebel article, and her business practices - https://youtu.be/cNfAuBEwcvo?si=Bn79bCDENtx45M3m
Another video you might like, Unearthing My Kaboodle from the 90's (yes it still has makeup in it) - https://youtu.be/fUeIdIIMoLA
*Time Stamps*
0:00 Intro
3:02 Lisa's Side of the Story
14:15 Question 1: When did Lisa “approve” the Kickstarter?
17:59 Question 2: Why did Glamour Dolls sign this awful contract?
21:07 Question 3: Why did the kickstarter happen knowing Lisa's contract was ending?*Relevant Links*
The Kickstarter - https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/168282293/lisa-frank-makeup-collaboration/posts/2816323
Allure article about the launch - https://www.allure.com/story/lisa-frank-glamour-dolls-makeup
The Kick Further - https://app.kickfurther.com/coop/lisa-frank-x-glamour-dolls-eyeshadow-and-matte-mousse-for-hot-topic-amazon-and-moreThe Jezebel Article - https://jezebel.com/inside-the-rainbow-gulag-the-technicolor-rise-and-fall-1179495705
Lawsuit Press Release - https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/glamour-dolls-inc-files-federal-lawsuit-against-lisa-frank-and-lisa-frank-inc-301310713.html or https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0242/5397/files/Glamour_Dolls_LF_Press_Release.pdf?v=1623354739
The Insider Article - https://www.businessinsider.com/lisa-frank-morphe-makeup-collection-backlash-2020-11?utm_source=yahoo.com&utm_medium=referral
Insider Update - https://www.businessinsider.com/beauty-brand-glamour-dolls-is-suing-lisa-frank-2021-6
Formal Complaint - https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0242/5397/files/Glamour_Dolls_Complaint_FILED_5.27.21.pdf?v=1623339145
Court Documents - https://unicourt.com/case/pc-db5-glamour-dolls-incorporated-v-lisa-frank-incorporated-et-al-920679?init_S=ch_ftrd
Available Court Filing - https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-azd-4_21-cv-00228/pdf/USCOURTS-azd-4_21-cv-00228-0.pdfApp BuzzFeed Article https://www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/lisa-frank-app-lets-you-put-stickers-on-your-photo
History of QR codes https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365-life-hacks/privacy-and-safety/brief-history-qr-codes
----------------------------------------------------------------
Curious about my current favorite skincare and makeup products? I've got a bunch for you all in one place! https://shop.howl.me/JenLuvThanks for subscribing to my channel (https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=jenluvsreviews) ! I specialize in thorough makeup reviews that give you WAY more than the typical YouTube review including ingredient analysis, close up finger/brush swatches, and MORE! You'll also find What's Up in Makeup on Sunday mornings giving you the most UP TO DATE information about what is happening in the beauty industry, new product releases and MORE!
Want to be part of the Collective Brain Elite? Join HERE for $1.99 per month - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR96_hHJu3HE6vmu39_bRAw/join
The What's Up In Makeup LIVE CHAT Podcast is now available! You can access it through YouTube or through YouTube Music! https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkvMuM8y-gS0ELxRW9j_wgwDTKx2IR0-x
FTC: This is not a sponsored video.
Out-tro Music: Dimples by Oomiee via Epidemic Sound
*******************
Want to help out with What's Up in Makeup? Check out our Hunters group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/wuimhuntersofficial
*******************
Instagram: jenluvsreviews
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@jenluvsreviews?lang=en
*******************************
Affiliate Code
Save $5 at ColourPop with code JENLUV
Save 10% at Alter Ego with code JENLUVSCURRENT SETUP:
IKEA Alex Drawers (9): https://go.magik.ly/ml/vr6g/
IKEA Alex Drawers (5): https://go.magik.ly/ml/vr6h/
Main Camera: https://shop-links.co/1754696005976721339
FAVORITE Lens right now: https://shop-links.co/1754696005286447409
Lens Adapter for GH5: https://shop-links.co/1754696006107520142
Best Lights: https://amzn.to/3adDo7B
Diffuser for Best Lights: https://amzn.to/2Tarfe5
Good Lights: https://amzn.to/2TuDjaa
Vlog Cam(Great Starter for YT): https://amzn.to/2PBgeOm
Good Mic: https://amzn.to/2NkeNpR
Best Mic: https://amzn.to/2PyJ1FP
AWESOME LENSES FOR MY PHONE! : https://shop-links.co/1754696009072833955
Tripod: https://shop-links.co/1754696008219826685 - Video Language:
- English
- Team:
- Captions Requested
- Duration:
- 29:58