Lisa Frank's Side of the Story - Glamour Dolls Makeup x Lisa Frank PART 2| Behind the Controversy
-
Not SyncedGlamour Dolls failed to comply with
-
Not Syncedthose obligations when it engaged in a
-
Not Syncedfailed online advertising campaign on
-
Not SyncedKickstarter, using LFI, Lisa Frank's brand
-
Not Syncedwithout LFI's approval and then refused to
-
Not Syncedpay royalties due when LFI properly
-
Not Syncedterminated the party's contracts as a
-
Not Syncedresult of Glamour Dolls' misconduct.
-
Not SyncedWait a minute. She didn't know about the
-
Not SyncedKickstarter? Hello my friend, I will
-
Not Syncedhonestly tell you that until late last
-
Not Syncednight, I did not think that I was filming
-
Not Synceda video about Lisa Frank and Glamour
-
Not SyncedDolls today. I actually had a full video
-
Not Syncedplanned about preservative-free cosmetics
-
Not Syncedand how freaking ridiculous and dangerous
-
Not Syncedpreservative-free cosmetics are. But then
-
Not SyncedI got a very interesting comment from a
-
Not Syncedperson named "Fake Goth Girl." Okay. I get
-
Not Synceda link. The link is to a court document
-
Not Syncedthat I had not previously had access to.
-
Not SyncedThis document is Lisa Frank's point of
-
Not Syncedview. It is her counter suit. This is Lisa
-
Not SyncedFrank saying "Glamour Dolls is the bad
-
Not Syncedguy, not me. I didn't do anything wrong -
-
Not Syncedthey're the ones that did something
-
Not Syncedwrong." So in today's video, I want to go
-
Not Syncedover Lisa's side of things - what she says
-
Not Syncedin the court documents is the reason why
-
Not Syncedshe pulled out of her contract with
-
Not SyncedGlamour Dolls that left backers of the
-
Not SyncedKickstarter out all of their money - over
-
Not Synced$400,000 of their money, including my
-
Not Syncedmoney. My $75? Gone. If you have no idea
-
Not Syncedwhat I'm talking about, that's because
-
Not Syncedthis is Part 2. I strongly strongly
-
Not Syncedsuggest you please watch Part 1 of this.
-
Not SyncedIt will be linked below. It will be up in
-
Not Synceda card. It is the background for this
-
Not Syncedvideo - this video might not make sense
-
Not Syncedif you don't watch that one first. If you
-
Not Synceddon't feel like you have time for an hour
-
Not Syncedand a half long video, what you can do is
-
Not Syncedyou can scrub through the timestamps, kind
-
Not Syncedof get the idea of what it is. You can
-
Not Syncedalso play it on 1.5 speed if you want to.
-
Not SyncedAnd I will tell you that the average
-
Not Syncedamount of watch time on that video for a
-
Not Syncedsingle view is about 40 minutes. That has
-
Not Syncedliterally never happened on my channel.
-
Not SyncedThis is a story that I think you want to
-
Not Syncedhear and and that I think that you are
-
Not Syncedgoing to be engaged in if you choose to.
-
Not SyncedThat being said, we are starting at Part
-
Not Synced2. I'm assuming at this point that you
-
Not Syncedhave seen that video and that you have
-
Not Syncedthat background knowledge. And also,
-
Not Syncedside note, I mentioned this at the end of
-
Not Syncedthe video, but there's probably about 40
-
Not Syncedcomments mentioning Bailey Sarian's video
-
Not Syncedon Lisa Frank, based on the Jezebel
-
Not Syncedarticle that we talked about in the first
-
Not Syncedpart of this. Yes, I am fully aware of
-
Not SyncedBailey's video. I have met Bailey. I have
-
Not Syncedcollaborated with Bailey. Bailey did a
-
Not Syncedfantastic job on that video. That video is
-
Not Syncedmore about Lisa Frank as a person, so if
-
Not Syncedyou want even more context for the story,
-
Not SyncedI highly recommend you go watch Bailey's
-
Not Syncedvideo as well. What we're gonna do with
-
Not Syncedthis part is I'm actually gonna put Lisa
-
Not SyncedFrank's lawsuit on the side of me so if
-
Not Syncedyou are fluent in Legalese, you can follow
-
Not Syncedalong and see the match up of what I'm
-
Not Syncedsaying. Surprisingly, a lot of is is
-
Not Syncedpretty clear cut and there isn't a ton of
-
Not Syncedlawyer language in this that was difficult
-
Not Syncedto understand. So if you would like to
-
Not Syncedread along, it is going to be next to me
-
Not Syncedover here. Here we go. So this is what
-
Not SyncedLisa says. This is her side of things.
-
Not SyncedThis is all about the deal in 2016, the
-
Not Syncedoriginal deal that she had. Lisa says they
-
Not Syncedstruck the deal in June of 2016 that would
-
Not Syncedend on December 31st of 2017 - that
-
Not Syncedmatches up with Glamour Dolls' side, so
-
Not SyncedI'm assuming there's legal contracts, so
-
Not Syncedthere's evidence of this. So Glamour Dolls
-
Not Syncedin that original contract, agreed to pay
-
Not SyncedLisa Frank 15% royalty on the net sales
-
Not Syncedof the products made under the deal, with
-
Not Synceda minimum payment of $100,000 for the
-
Not Syncedduration of the agreement, including a
-
Not Synced$25,000 advance. Glamour Dolls promised to
-
Not Synceddo their best, to make, sell, promote, and
-
Not Syncedmarket the products to get as many sales
-
Not Syncedas possible, always focusing on high
-
Not Syncedquality. Now this part is very very
-
Not Syncedimportant because this is really the root
-
Not Syncedof why everything went wrong. They had to
-
Not Syncedget Lisa Frank's approval on literally
-
Not Syncedeverything, from the design concepts to
-
Not Syncedthe artwork, to the molds for production,
-
Not Syncedto the final product samples before going
-
Not Syncedinto production. Lisa Frank had the right
-
Not Syncedto approve or reject the elements and
-
Not SyncedGlamour Dolls had to follow Lisa Frank's
-
Not Synceddirections on quality standards. Now
-
Not Syncedlisten to this because this is part of the
-
Not Syncedreason why things were taking so long. So,
-
Not Syncedfor designs, Glamour Dolls had to wait up
-
Not Syncedto 10 business days - that's about two
-
Not Syncedweeks or so - for Lisa Frank to approve
-
Not Syncedor reject anything that they submitted to
-
Not Syncedher. If Lisa didn't respond in time,
-
Not SyncedGlamour Dolls was allowed to ask after
-
Not Syncedthose 10 business days, "Hey, what's going
-
Not Syncedon? I need a full description of why you
-
Not Syncedreject this or I need an approval." But
-
Not Syncedthis is the kicker! Because even after
-
Not Syncedapproval, and remember, this is according
-
Not Syncedto Lisa herself,
- Title:
- Lisa Frank's Side of the Story - Glamour Dolls Makeup x Lisa Frank PART 2| Behind the Controversy
- Description:
-
- Video Language:
- English
- Team:
- Captions Requested
- Duration:
- 29:58
Show all