< Return to Video

The Secret Life of Pronouns: James Pennebaker at TEDxAustin

  • 0:10 - 0:14
    So some of the smallest
    most insignificant work
  • 0:14 - 0:18
    is everyday cos reflect
    a lot about who we are.
  • 0:18 - 0:20
    And I say this not
    as a linguist,
  • 0:20 - 0:24
    or a computer scientist
    but as a social psychologist.
  • 0:24 - 0:26
    And today I'd like
    to tell you a story
  • 0:26 - 0:28
    that summarizes
    a lot of the research
  • 0:28 - 0:31
    that my colleagues,
    my students and I have done,
  • 0:31 - 0:35
    that have helped me
    to come to this realization.
  • 0:35 - 0:38
    Now several years ago I was studying
    the nature of traumatic experience
  • 0:38 - 0:41
    and how it is related
    to physical health
  • 0:41 - 0:45
    and kept finding
    that just completely perplexed me.
  • 0:45 - 0:49
    Basically when people have
    a major traumatic experience in their life,
  • 0:49 - 0:52
    they are much more likely
    to get sick after that event,
  • 0:52 - 0:54
    if they keep the events secret,
  • 0:54 - 1:02
    than if they actually
    talk to other people.
  • 1:02 - 1:07
    So, this really bugged me,
    so keeping a secret it seems
  • 1:07 - 1:09
    is somehow toxic.
  • 1:16 - 1:18
    ####this let me too
  • 1:18 - 1:21
    brunson experiment we brought people in the laboratory
  • 1:21 - 1:23
    and we asked them to write about
  • 1:23 - 1:26
    the most dramatic experiences they've had
  • 1:26 - 1:28
    especially if they kept a secret
  • 1:28 - 1:30
    and these are big trauma cedras things like right
  • 1:30 - 1:31
    they were like uh...
  • 1:31 - 1:34
    major public humiliations or failure
  • 1:34 - 1:38
    and the results that we got from this this study were stunning
  • 1:38 - 1:39
    we discovered that
  • 1:39 - 1:40
    harried
  • 1:40 - 1:43
    people write as little as fifteen minutes a day for three or four
  • 1:43 - 1:45
    consecutive days brought about
  • 1:45 - 1:48
    meaningful change in people's physical health
  • 1:48 - 1:51
    and even their immune function
  • 1:51 - 1:54
    translating up saying experiences into words
  • 1:54 - 1:56
    makes a difference
  • 1:56 - 1:58
    book why
  • 1:58 - 2:01
    since then there been hundreds of studies done by lab so all over the
  • 2:01 - 2:04
    world trying to answer this and they haven't come up with the single life as
  • 2:04 - 2:06
    a single explanation
  • 2:06 - 2:09
    by own approach was to actually
  • 2:09 - 2:11
    look at the essays that these people wrote
  • 2:11 - 2:13
    and try to figure out
  • 2:13 - 2:16
    was there something about the essays i can't predict who would benefit from
  • 2:16 - 2:18
    writing verses he wouldn't
  • 2:18 - 2:21
    i tried and i couldn't figure it out
  • 2:21 - 2:25
    so i gotta number psychologists and other experts to read and write hundreds
  • 2:25 - 2:26
    of these essays
  • 2:26 - 2:30
    and they couldn't fixya pattern either
  • 2:30 - 2:32
    units to try some other strategies cell
  • 2:32 - 2:36
    with the help of one of my graduate students partha francis we're on a
  • 2:36 - 2:37
    computer program
  • 2:37 - 2:40
    and the idea of this computer program was to go into any given text
  • 2:40 - 2:44
    and calculate the percentage of words in the attacks that were positive emotion
  • 2:44 - 2:45
    words
  • 2:45 - 2:46
    negative emotion words
  • 2:46 - 2:51
    or words related to topics such as death or sex or violence or
  • 2:51 - 2:53
    religion or family
  • 2:53 - 2:56
    and as long as we are writing the computer program
  • 2:56 - 2:59
    i thought well let's go ahead and throw in some parts of speech pronouns
  • 2:59 - 3:01
    prepositions
  • 3:01 - 3:04
    because it was easy who cares
  • 3:04 - 3:05
    i go back
  • 3:05 - 3:08
    start to analyze these dramatic essays
  • 3:08 - 3:10
    squiggly discover that
  • 3:10 - 3:12
    the content of what people were writing about
  • 3:12 - 3:16
    hetnet didn't matter in terms of if they improved in their help they're not
  • 3:16 - 3:17
    instead
  • 3:17 - 3:21
    ulysses with these job boards pronouns and articles of prepositions and so
  • 3:21 - 3:22
    forth
  • 3:22 - 3:24
    that didn't matter
  • 3:24 - 3:26
    not think about this
  • 3:26 - 3:27
    here people are writing about
  • 3:27 - 3:30
    deeply disturbing issues
  • 3:30 - 3:33
    the actual topics that dealt with
  • 3:33 - 3:36
    tragedies devastation horrible things
  • 3:36 - 3:39
    the topics themselves in the words associate with those topics made no
  • 3:39 - 3:40
    difference
  • 3:40 - 3:45
    instead these little words like aryan vi and and didn't matter
  • 3:45 - 3:47
    i get looking for the obvious
  • 3:47 - 3:48
    but in fact
  • 3:48 - 3:51
    and i don't pay attention to what people were saying
  • 3:51 - 3:54
    but not how they were saying it
  • 3:54 - 3:56
    so how do i go about
  • 3:56 - 3:58
    analyzing watch versus how
  • 3:58 - 4:02
    well turns out that they're difficult classes of words that makes these makes
  • 4:02 - 4:04
    that look at this distinction whatever it is
  • 4:04 - 4:07
    if you're looking at what people are writing about you look at when park all
  • 4:07 - 4:13
    content word caesar now into the regular verbs it as yet since i'm a adverbs
  • 4:13 - 4:17
    you know that's stuff of thought this is the stuff of communication we were
  • 4:17 - 4:20
    trying to talk to somebody gogo
  • 4:20 - 4:23
    and search terms are all based on these content words
  • 4:23 - 4:27
    the other group of words are art class of words urgently cult
  • 4:27 - 4:28
    function works
  • 4:28 - 4:29
    at funship words
  • 4:29 - 4:31
    are made up of the most boring
  • 4:31 - 4:34
    words that you can imagine
  • 4:34 - 4:35
    they're made up of
  • 4:35 - 4:38
    pronouns army he she
  • 4:38 - 4:40
    prepositions to of four
  • 4:40 - 4:44
    auxiliary verbs and is have
  • 4:44 - 4:48
    out wake you up by-catch they'll have to wake up i keep talking about these
  • 4:48 - 4:50
    function worth dot
  • 4:50 - 4:52
    it turns out these function words
  • 4:52 - 4:55
    are really interested because first of all
  • 4:55 - 4:57
    there's only about five hundred
  • 4:57 - 4:59
    function words in english
  • 4:59 - 5:02
    so they account for far less than one percent of all the words we know we hear
  • 5:02 - 5:04
    weary
  • 5:04 - 5:07
    nevertheless they reflect fifty-five dist
  • 5:07 - 5:09
    to sixty percent of all the words that we
  • 5:09 - 5:11
    that we are surrounded with their everywhere
  • 5:11 - 5:13
    but we don't pay attention to them
  • 5:13 - 5:15
    in english and in other languages
  • 5:15 - 5:17
    there the shortest words there are a hand
  • 5:17 - 5:19
    when they're spoken or with your reading
  • 5:19 - 5:23
    pcf into your brain at the speed of less than two tenths of a second
  • 5:23 - 5:27
    meaning that they're processed essentially not consciously
  • 5:27 - 5:29
    but there's something even more interesting about that
  • 5:29 - 5:32
    they are social they are
  • 5:32 - 5:33
    profoundly social
  • 5:33 - 5:36
    let me give me an example let's say you're walking along
  • 5:36 - 5:37
    you see in note on the ground
  • 5:37 - 5:39
    you pick it up and says
  • 5:39 - 5:42
    i am placing it on the table
  • 5:42 - 5:44
    well that kinda makes an skied it doesn't
  • 5:44 - 5:48
    by places on the table this to content words placing in table
  • 5:48 - 5:50
    all the rest of function worked
  • 5:50 - 5:52
    i am yet
  • 5:52 - 5:54
    on p
  • 5:54 - 5:58
    now the reason this doesn't make sense to most of us
  • 5:58 - 5:59
    is it was i
  • 5:59 - 6:01
    no idea amma implies
  • 6:01 - 6:04
    present tense when was it written
  • 6:04 - 6:06
    no idea what it is
  • 6:06 - 6:08
    on v table v table
  • 6:08 - 6:10
    needs its a table that
  • 6:10 - 6:11
    dot author knew about
  • 6:11 - 6:14
    and they intended recipient of this note new about
  • 6:14 - 6:17
    but nobody else did and in fact
  • 6:17 - 6:19
    there's no only has meaning
  • 6:19 - 6:21
    to the uh... authored
  • 6:21 - 6:22
    and the recipient of the note
  • 6:22 - 6:28
    at a particular time in a particular location in fact if i took that no to
  • 6:28 - 6:30
    this all turn out six months later and say
  • 6:30 - 6:34
    what's this all about there's a good chance that the the off was safe
  • 6:34 - 6:37
    no idea
  • 6:37 - 6:39
    function of words are social
  • 6:39 - 6:43
    they tell us about the author they tell us about the relationship between the
  • 6:43 - 6:44
    author of the recipient
  • 6:44 - 6:47
    and relationship between the author
  • 6:47 - 6:49
    and the topic itself
  • 6:49 - 6:52
    is take heart of what i want to talk to you about today
  • 6:52 - 6:54
    by analyzing function words
  • 6:54 - 6:56
    we start to get a sense
  • 6:56 - 6:58
    of who people are quick to relationships are
  • 6:58 - 7:00
    how they think about theirselves
  • 7:00 - 7:01
    and how they
  • 7:01 - 7:04
    connect with others
  • 7:04 - 7:06
    whether a lot of function words
  • 7:06 - 7:10
    honestly i could talk for several hours about function words but i'm going to
  • 7:10 - 7:12
    spare you that it just focus on it
  • 7:12 - 7:15
    couple today to just give you a flavor of her
  • 7:15 - 7:17
    why they're so interesting
  • 7:17 - 7:21
    let's start off with pro downs of the storm up with third-person pronouns like
  • 7:21 - 7:24
    t-shirt ye bang
  • 7:24 - 7:27
    it turns out some people out there in the world used pronouns these
  • 7:27 - 7:29
    third-person pronouns at high rates
  • 7:29 - 7:31
    and other people at lower rates
  • 7:31 - 7:34
    what kind of person would use
  • 7:34 - 7:38
    well you have to think about pronouns as and all function words
  • 7:38 - 7:39
    in terms of
  • 7:39 - 7:42
    where our people paying attention
  • 7:42 - 7:45
    if you are using these third-person pronounced by different definition
  • 7:45 - 7:47
    you're paying attention to other people
  • 7:47 - 7:50
    you care about other people you're thinking about other people
  • 7:50 - 7:52
    at people who use these at high rates
  • 7:52 - 7:54
    are much more socially engaged
  • 7:54 - 7:58
    we can analyze emails tweets and so forth and get a sense someone's social
  • 7:58 - 8:01
    engagement just by looking at this
  • 8:01 - 8:06
    how about first-person singular part as a highly me in mind
  • 8:06 - 8:07
    okay
  • 8:07 - 8:11
    you see tential argument somewhat is attending to their thoughts feelings
  • 8:11 - 8:12
    behaviors
  • 8:12 - 8:15
    to themselves and subway would use these words more
  • 8:15 - 8:19
    what kind of person you think uses aren't words the most
  • 8:19 - 8:21
    you're sitting there you're speaking for them
  • 8:21 - 8:22
    well somebody who's
  • 8:22 - 8:25
    self-centered self-important narcissistic
  • 8:25 - 8:26
    uh...
  • 8:26 - 8:31
    hungry for power and highest status
  • 8:31 - 8:34
    you would be completely wrong
  • 8:34 - 8:36
    in fact the person who is
  • 8:36 - 8:40
    highest instead issues is on words the least
  • 8:40 - 8:42
    the new rephrase that
  • 8:42 - 8:46
    the hire anybody isn't status the less they use a high were ds
  • 8:46 - 8:48
    the lower so what is in status
  • 8:48 - 8:51
    the higher they use a spy works
  • 8:51 - 8:54
    i discovered this by analyzing emails
  • 8:54 - 8:59
    isdn messages natural conversations business groups and so forth
  • 8:59 - 9:02
    in the affects were huge
  • 9:02 - 9:05
    i look at these results and i thought
  • 9:05 - 9:09
    this must be true for other people but he can't possibly be true for me
  • 9:09 - 9:13
    you know i'd love everybody equally
  • 9:13 - 9:16
    isolated analyze my own emails
  • 9:16 - 9:17
    on the same as everybody else
  • 9:17 - 9:22
    alexey melt that i get from the undergraduate student
  • 9:22 - 9:25
    dear doctor pennebaker i would like to know if i could possibly meet with you
  • 9:25 - 9:28
    because i think i need to change my grades are right back
  • 9:28 - 9:32
    dear student thank you so much for your email
  • 9:32 - 9:36
    unfortunately uh... later which prices don't work well
  • 9:36 - 9:39
    i look at my email to the dean
  • 9:39 - 9:42
    dare denied jamie pennebaker and i would like to ask if i could do this and i
  • 9:42 - 9:45
    could get that like to do this in the team rice packed
  • 9:45 - 9:50
    dear jamie thank you so much for your email so forth
  • 9:50 - 9:54
    not everybody is being completely polite
  • 9:54 - 9:56
    nobody's putting anybody down
  • 9:56 - 9:59
    this is the language of power in status
  • 9:59 - 10:02
    it tells us where people are paying attention high status person
  • 10:02 - 10:07
    is looking out at the world the los esperamos to be looking more inwardly
  • 10:07 - 10:09
    what about others states
  • 10:09 - 10:10
    lets move beyond status
  • 10:10 - 10:14
    let's look at emotional states
  • 10:14 - 10:17
    you would think that someone would be paying more attention to themselves
  • 10:17 - 10:19
    if they're in pain
  • 10:19 - 10:22
    it could be physical pain or emotional pain
  • 10:22 - 10:26
    in fact you alive we look at people who are depressed we've done any studies on
  • 10:26 - 10:28
    this we know the people who are depressed
  • 10:28 - 10:32
    pay attention to themselves more and they used the word i'm more
  • 10:32 - 10:36
    that one of our very first time he's looked at the poetry of suicidal and non
  • 10:36 - 10:40
    suicidal poets that we get this research where we
  • 10:40 - 10:43
    with through analyzer poetry and initially i thought
  • 10:43 - 10:46
    whether big big differences in the degree that they use negative emotion
  • 10:46 - 10:47
    words
  • 10:47 - 10:48
    not true
  • 10:48 - 10:54
    suicidal and non suicidal poets all use negative motion words at high rates
  • 10:54 - 10:59
    i think it's part of it is part of the job description
  • 10:59 - 11:01
    the big difference was their use of the word on
  • 11:01 - 11:04
    suicidal poets used to work hard work
  • 11:04 - 11:10
    consider this poll on this is by sylvia plath you later committed suicide
  • 11:10 - 11:13
    despotic listen to the way that she uses the word i
  • 11:13 - 11:15
    and first-person singular
  • 11:15 - 11:16
    and this is the optus
  • 11:16 - 11:21
    and taking some lines from her poland not bad girls love song
  • 11:21 - 11:24
    eyes shut my eyes and all the world drops dead
  • 11:24 - 11:27
    i've missed my live and always born again
  • 11:27 - 11:30
    i think a major up inside my head
  • 11:30 - 11:35
    by fitting in return the way you said but i grow old and i forget renee
  • 11:35 - 11:39
    i think i made you up inside my head
  • 11:39 - 11:42
    you can almost see plan
  • 11:42 - 11:46
    embracing her sorrow her misery and so forth
  • 11:46 - 11:50
    and you can compare her writing with uh... other poets who write about in but
  • 11:50 - 11:53
    not suicidal poets who right about lost love
  • 11:53 - 11:56
    when they gave him almost see them holding at all
  • 11:56 - 11:59
    from a distance of their looking at it from aboard distance
  • 11:59 - 12:02
    third-person perspective
  • 12:02 - 12:04
    now there's a really interesting things head out uh...
  • 12:04 - 12:07
    important theory within psychology about depression
  • 12:07 - 12:09
    and people who are depressed arf
  • 12:09 - 12:14
    thought to be people who are very high in self-awareness urself focus
  • 12:14 - 12:16
    and part of this is a also tend to be
  • 12:16 - 12:20
    extremely uh... honest
  • 12:20 - 12:22
    there often
  • 12:22 - 12:23
    today are it
  • 12:23 - 12:25
    they're they're many study showing that they
  • 12:25 - 12:27
    have this deficit in they're not able to have
  • 12:27 - 12:30
    a positive illusions about ourselves
  • 12:30 - 12:31
    those of us who are depressed
  • 12:31 - 12:35
    get by every day but holding these insane illusions about the life
  • 12:35 - 12:36
    but these people
  • 12:36 - 12:39
    are brutally honest
  • 12:39 - 12:41
    now this made me wonder
  • 12:41 - 12:44
    throwaway depression for just a second could return this entire thing upside
  • 12:44 - 12:47
    down to find out if depressed people
  • 12:47 - 12:50
    or if we could use the computer program
  • 12:50 - 12:53
    linguistic lie-detector let me for anybody so
  • 12:53 - 12:57
    in fact we did some studies for we bra people no lab we do some to lie or tell
  • 12:57 - 12:58
    the truth
  • 12:58 - 13:01
    we analyze court transcripts of people who are all found guilty half of whom
  • 13:01 - 13:03
    were exhausted later exonerated
  • 13:03 - 13:06
    and the affects rectly quite impressive
  • 13:06 - 13:10
    we did a pretty good job at telling to someone who is telling the truth verses
  • 13:10 - 13:12
    lying in one of the best words
  • 13:12 - 13:15
    was he uses the word i'm people who tell the truth
  • 13:15 - 13:19
    used the word i border pony what they're saying liars
  • 13:19 - 13:26
    pertaining to hold off distancing themselves
  • 13:26 - 13:28
    lie detection depression
  • 13:28 - 13:32
    status are all something so we can look at but one of the things that i'm most
  • 13:32 - 13:36
    interested now is looking at groups looking at the relationship between two
  • 13:36 - 13:38
    people can you tell how to people
  • 13:38 - 13:39
    forget who won't bite
  • 13:39 - 13:43
    by analyzing the weight they're using function worked with each other
  • 13:43 - 13:47
    and the answer is yes we look at the percentage of each class of words and we
  • 13:47 - 13:51
    come up with the metrics mccall language style matchy
  • 13:51 - 13:55
    and the more that two people are matching their function word use
  • 13:55 - 13:57
    the more there on the same page
  • 13:57 - 14:00
    the more they're talking about something in the same way
  • 14:00 - 14:04
    now what i said we started to look at this was with speed dating
  • 14:04 - 14:06
    not going to tell you
  • 14:06 - 14:09
    love speed dating i've really it just
  • 14:09 - 14:12
    i would never do it in a million years
  • 14:12 - 14:16
    but anchorage all of you to go do speed dating it when you do
  • 14:16 - 14:19
    invite a researcher along because there is no carradine
  • 14:19 - 14:21
    it is better
  • 14:21 - 14:25
    we've been involved in st speed dating projects where
  • 14:25 - 14:26
    people coming in
  • 14:26 - 14:30
    and in there for a minute date we tape-recorded they know we are heavily
  • 14:30 - 14:33
    transcribe the not the way they talk
  • 14:33 - 14:36
    the more they match in their language
  • 14:36 - 14:39
    the more likely they are to go out on a date we can predict who will go on a
  • 14:39 - 14:44
    date at rates slightly better than the people themselves here
  • 14:44 - 14:48
    we've done studies with young dating couples where we uh...
  • 14:48 - 14:51
    they had to be in our study they have to give this ten days of the instant
  • 14:51 - 14:53
    messages our audience
  • 14:53 - 14:58
    and what we do is we analyze their audience with its this style matching
  • 14:58 - 15:02
    and we do much much better than they do have prediction if they'll be together
  • 15:02 - 15:05
    three months later
  • 15:05 - 15:08
    the fact is his these words are telling us how individuals and
  • 15:08 - 15:10
    pairs of people are connecting
  • 15:10 - 15:13
    what about groups now this is an area that were network you know we're looking
  • 15:13 - 15:17
    at working groups summary groups that we've uh... work with people in the
  • 15:17 - 15:21
    business school would look at uh... people you get to know you groups
  • 15:21 - 15:25
    we do at occasional groups and what we're finding his bike looking at group
  • 15:25 - 15:29
    of say five a six people we cannot get a sense of how productive the group will
  • 15:29 - 15:32
    be and also how cohesive the group
  • 15:32 - 15:35
    simply by looking at the style matching
  • 15:35 - 15:37
    but here's where things are starting to get you christine
  • 15:37 - 15:43
    bite tracking a groups this interacting and say they're all interacting online
  • 15:43 - 15:47
    we can't have a computer of monitoring how the group is behaving imagine for
  • 15:47 - 15:48
    example
  • 15:48 - 15:49
    you are up
  • 15:49 - 15:50
    in this group
  • 15:50 - 15:52
    and a computer approach
  • 15:52 - 15:54
    comes to your group every now and then
  • 15:54 - 15:57
    anna message comes and says
  • 15:57 - 16:00
    you guys are not paying attention to one another
  • 16:00 - 16:04
    you need to be you'd be more attentive to what the other people are saying or
  • 16:04 - 16:07
    you guys for the last few minutes have strayed off topic
  • 16:07 - 16:11
    try to get back on topic or that loud mouth in the group the computer comes in
  • 16:11 - 16:12
    missus
  • 16:12 - 16:17
    joan for the last five minutes you said fifty percent of the words when she
  • 16:17 - 16:18
    stand back
  • 16:18 - 16:21
    any courage others to talk
  • 16:21 - 16:24
    we have now created a program that does the s
  • 16:24 - 16:28
    and we've now tested out with hundreds of groups and that we are getting very
  • 16:28 - 16:31
    very promising results
  • 16:31 - 16:33
    now you can start to see
  • 16:33 - 16:37
    why a m so excited about this world the function works
  • 16:37 - 16:40
    that we're not taking this in all these in
  • 16:40 - 16:43
    directions that uh... i'd never would've thought about
  • 16:43 - 16:46
    we've been looking at it in terms of looking at historical records can you
  • 16:46 - 16:51
    tell if a particular uh... explorer committed suicide tourist murdered we've
  • 16:51 - 16:52
    got a project on that
  • 16:52 - 16:56
    can you look at a company and get a sense of how their internal
  • 16:56 - 17:00
    communications are working how well they are connected with the people in their
  • 17:00 - 17:04
    company or with their clients we look at that to corporate uh... earnings reports
  • 17:04 - 17:09
    or the quarterly phone calls to get a sense of the internal groups dynamics of
  • 17:09 - 17:12
    the company we've worked with the government to try to get a sense of
  • 17:12 - 17:17
    terrorist groups and how if they are likely to behaved badly
  • 17:17 - 17:21
    we help people sort out their love lives it
  • 17:21 - 17:23
    you can start to say that
  • 17:23 - 17:24
    bike harnessing these
  • 17:24 - 17:29
    east the power of these function words we can get a sense of individuals and
  • 17:29 - 17:33
    groups and help people are connected
  • 17:33 - 17:36
    now but i wouldn't hurt you to do
  • 17:36 - 17:38
    i'd like you to go home
  • 17:38 - 17:39
    tonight
  • 17:39 - 17:43
    and i want you to start looking at your emails here tweets year high amps or
  • 17:43 - 17:44
    whatever
  • 17:44 - 17:46
    added doing that
  • 17:46 - 17:48
    what i hope you start to see is
  • 17:48 - 17:52
    first of all you learn a little bit more about your relationship with others but
  • 17:52 - 17:53
    more than anything
  • 17:53 - 17:56
    i hope you learned a little bit of about yourself
Title:
The Secret Life of Pronouns: James Pennebaker at TEDxAustin
Description:

I, You, Me, We, Us -- small words with the tremendous ability to illuminate who we are and how we're feeling.

Chair of the Department of Psychology at one of the largest universities in the country, Jamie delves into our use of language and how it can reflect -- and reshape -- our understanding of ourselves, our interactions with others and our underlying feelings of strength and empowerment.

In the spirit of ideas worth spreading, TEDx is a program of local, self-organized events that bring people together to share a TED-like experience. At a TEDx event, TEDTalks video and live speakers combine to spark deep discussion and connection in a small group. These local, self-organized events are branded TEDx, where x = independently organized TED event. The TED Conference provides general guidance for the TEDx program, but individual TEDx events are self-organized.* (*Subject to certain rules and regulations)

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Team:
closed TED
Project:
TEDxTalks
Duration:
17:59

English subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions