Anthony Magnabosco - Street Epistemology: A Turning Point for Atheism
-
0:01 - 0:03[Applause]
-
0:04 - 0:06Good morning.
-
0:06 - 0:07Very, very excited to be here.
-
0:08 - 0:10This, I think, is probably the largest crowd
-
0:10 - 0:12that I've spoken to before.
-
0:12 - 0:15And it's kind of interesting to see how ...
-
0:16 - 0:18I probably wouldn't be here
-
0:18 - 0:20if it wasn't for going out and learning
-
0:20 - 0:22and practicing Street Epistemology.
-
0:22 - 0:24And I think one of the reasons
why I'm up here is -
0:24 - 0:28because this approach has
really sparked an interest. -
0:28 - 0:30I'm just a regular guy
who decided to go out -
0:30 - 0:33and just have conversations with people.
-
0:33 - 0:35And I think it's gotten a lot of attention
-
0:35 - 0:37from folks and I'm very excited
to share it with you. -
0:37 - 0:40I think this actually could be
-
0:40 - 0:42a turning point for atheism.
-
0:42 - 0:44I forgot that I have slides.
There we go. -
0:44 - 0:46[Laughing]
-
0:47 - 0:48Okay.
-
0:49 - 0:51And I think Street Epistemology is going
-
0:51 - 0:55to be critical to the success of atheism.
-
0:55 - 0:58Which is why I'm very excited
to tell you about it. -
0:58 - 1:00We're gonna get really into
-
1:00 - 1:03my journey and this method.
-
1:08 - 1:09Okay.
-
1:10 - 1:12I also want to talk a little bit about truth.
-
1:12 - 1:14I want to kind of take a step back a little bit.
-
1:15 - 1:18When we have conversations with people,
-
1:18 - 1:20usually we're interested in
-
1:20 - 1:22changing their mind or helping them to
-
1:22 - 1:24believe true things and usually we want
-
1:24 - 1:26to believe true things as well.
-
1:26 - 1:28So, we engage in debate or dialogue
-
1:28 - 1:30or conversation with them.
-
1:31 - 1:33But we have to remind ourselves
-
1:33 - 1:36that we ourselves are just
as capable of believing things -
1:36 - 1:37that are not true.
-
1:37 - 1:38It's entirely possible
-
1:38 - 1:41that a lot of the things
that I believe are not true. -
1:43 - 1:48So, what is the best way
to determine what is true? -
1:48 - 1:52What is the best way
to determine what is not true? -
1:54 - 1:57These are questions that have troubled
humanity from the beginning, -
1:58 - 2:04but as atheists I think we try
to accomplish this question about God -
2:04 - 2:07when we engage in debate
with people we tend to argue -
2:07 - 2:10with them or discuss the finer points
-
2:10 - 2:12of the Bible, for example.
-
2:13 - 2:14And it's oftentimes hard to get
-
2:14 - 2:16into the mindset of a believer
-
2:16 - 2:19unless you discuss
what that person believes. -
2:21 - 2:23We tend to focus a lot about that.
-
2:23 - 2:25We tend to focus a lot about
what the person believes -
2:25 - 2:27as opposed to their
reasons or their method. -
2:28 - 2:30And I think it's really important
-
2:30 - 2:34that as atheists we need
to find a better way -
2:34 - 2:36of figuring out what is true
-
2:36 - 2:39and helping people figure out what is not true.
-
2:39 - 2:41And again that's why
I'm so excited to be here -
2:41 - 2:42to tell you about this method
-
2:42 - 2:45because I think this might be the thing
-
2:45 - 2:48that helps atheists have better conversations
-
2:48 - 2:50with the believers who are making these claims.
-
2:52 - 2:53Okay.
-
2:53 - 2:54I brought along--
-
2:54 - 2:56Oh, did I kick out...
-
2:56 - 2:57Bruce here?
-
2:59 - 3:01Can you maximize that?
-
3:01 - 3:04Okay, that may have been my fault--
-
3:04 - 3:07Okay. So, I brought along
a couple of video clips here. -
3:07 - 3:09So, just still just a little warning.
-
3:09 - 3:10The first video clip I want to show you
-
3:10 - 3:12is about two minutes long.
-
3:12 - 3:13I've got five video clips total,
-
3:13 - 3:16but I want to kind of show
you how I used to go out -
3:16 - 3:18and have talks with believers.
-
3:19 - 3:22This is a street preacher
in front of the Alamo. -
3:22 - 3:24And this was back in 2012.
-
3:24 - 3:26This is about two minutes long.
-
3:27 - 3:30He does talk about hell during this video.
-
3:30 - 3:33So, fair warning if that troubles you.
-
3:33 - 3:35You might want to be aware of that.
-
3:36 - 3:40Oh, there are some people that are
really troubled by it and that's fine. -
3:40 - 3:41So, just fair warning.
-
3:41 - 3:44And this is NOT an example
of Street Epistemology. -
3:44 - 3:46Don't watch this video,
walk out and think: -
3:46 - 3:48�Oh, that's what Street Epistemology is.�
-
3:48 - 3:51And the other takeaway
I wanted to let you know -
3:51 - 3:53is that I'm not really
proud of this exchange. -
3:53 - 3:54[Laughing]
-
3:54 - 3:56So, here we go.
-
3:56 - 3:56Street preacher Phil.
-
3:56 - 3:57IL: Jesus says,
-
3:57 - 3:58[Playing video clip]
-
3:58 - 4:01"My mother and my brotheren are these
-
4:01 - 4:02which hear the word of God and do it."
-
4:03 - 4:04AM: You said that already.
-
4:04 - 4:06IL: You have the Word of God.
It's in the King James Bible. -
4:06 - 4:08It's not the Book of Mormon.
-
4:09 - 4:11It's not the Kabbalah.
-
4:11 - 4:14It's not the Babylonian Talmud.
-
4:14 - 4:16There's just a word of God.
-
4:16 - 4:17The King James Bible.
-
4:17 - 4:19AM: There's just as much evidence
-
4:19 - 4:21for those Gods as there's for your God.
-
4:21 - 4:22IL: Not really.
-
4:22 - 4:23AM: Yes, there is.
-
4:23 - 4:25There's zero evidence.
-
4:25 - 4:26IL: The Scripture says:
-
4:26 - 4:29"Christ Jesus came
into the world to save sinners." -
4:29 - 4:32AM: That's what it says, but why
should we believe it today? -
4:32 - 4:34Why should we believe that?
-
4:34 - 4:36IL: Now are you a Mormon
or a Baptist or a Catholic -
4:36 - 4:39or a Methodist, but are you saved?
-
4:40 - 4:42The Bible says we must be saved.
-
4:42 - 4:46Jesus saved me in 1987 in the month of December
-
4:46 - 4:49and I'm not going back to what I was.
-
4:49 - 4:51I'm no better than anybody else
-
4:51 - 4:54but, my friends, as a street preacher
-
4:54 - 4:58I gotta warn you: There is a hell
and you're going there. -
4:58 - 5:00AM: There's absolutely no there's
-
5:00 - 5:03absolutely no evidence for a hell
-
5:03 - 5:06or a heaven or a purgatory.
-
5:06 - 5:09There's no evidence for that at all.
-
5:10 - 5:11IL: You'll find out!
-
5:11 - 5:14AM: How could you believe in something now
-
5:14 - 5:17without even knowing that it's true?
-
5:17 - 5:19AM: You point to the Bible again.
-
5:19 - 5:22There's no evidence
that the Bible is true. -
5:22 - 5:24IL: You don't believe it, dude.
-
5:24 - 5:26AM: Of course I don't.
I'm not convinced that it is true. -
5:26 - 5:27IL: Well, that's all right.
-
5:27 - 5:29I'm not condemning you
because you don't, man! -
5:29 - 5:30AM: You're making the claim.
-
5:30 - 5:32You need to prove to me that it is true.
-
5:32 - 5:33IL: I don't have
to prove to you anything. -
5:33 - 5:34AM: Yes, you do!
-
5:34 - 5:37You can't stand out here
and make claims as if it's a fact! -
5:37 - 5:38IL: Right here, man, that's my facts!
-
5:38 - 5:39AM: And scare these people and young kids.
-
5:40 - 5:40IL: Hey, listen dude ...
-
5:40 - 5:42AM: What's wrong with you?
-
5:42 - 5:43[Laughter]
-
5:43 - 5:45[Applause]
-
5:51 - 5:55I was kind of hoping that would
NOT draw an applause line� -
5:55 - 5:57[Laughter]
-
5:57 - 6:00You know, at the time it
felt good to humiliate him. -
6:00 - 6:01It really did.
-
6:01 - 6:06He was saying this nonsense
and just yelling things and ... -
6:06 - 6:07I wasn't aware that there is
-
6:07 - 6:10a potentially better way
to interact with believers. -
6:10 - 6:12So, I was arguing with him.
-
6:12 - 6:14I was just doing what just seemed natural
-
6:14 - 6:16to point him to evidence,
-
6:16 - 6:18to challenge what he was saying.
-
6:18 - 6:21And I didn't realize it at the time
-
6:21 - 6:23that it probably
didn't make me as an atheist -
6:23 - 6:27look very good standing out there.
-
6:27 - 6:29As I watch this even I noticed
that he explains -
6:29 - 6:31why he believes that it was true.
-
6:31 - 6:33He had a difficulty way back
-
6:33 - 6:35when he gave an exact date.
-
6:35 - 6:36There was some momentous occasion
-
6:36 - 6:38and he didn't want
to go back to that time. -
6:39 - 6:40He didn't want to go back
-
6:40 - 6:41to that time of where he was hurting.
-
6:41 - 6:44So, there's the motivation behind his belief.
-
6:44 - 6:46But I couldn't even see it
-
6:46 - 6:47because I was so interested in arguing
-
6:47 - 6:50with him and tearing him down.
-
6:50 - 6:54However, that approach
I think does have its place. -
6:54 - 6:57If you look there's people
in the background watching. -
6:57 - 6:58There's a young couple there.
-
6:58 - 7:00Behind the sign there's a little kid.
-
7:00 - 7:02And you never know what that
-
7:02 - 7:03takeaway may have been.
-
7:03 - 7:06They may have been
shocked to hear somebody -
7:06 - 7:08standing up to a believer making a claim.
-
7:08 - 7:11They may have gone home
to figure out is the Bible true. -
7:11 - 7:12You never know how that may
-
7:12 - 7:14have landed with people observing.
-
7:15 - 7:17But let's think about Phil.
-
7:18 - 7:21Do you think that his mind
was changed that day? -
7:21 - 7:23It's probably unlikely.
-
7:23 - 7:28More than likely he went home,
read his Bible, said a prayer -
7:28 - 7:30and was emboldened by that conversation.
-
7:30 - 7:34He's probably thinking that it's
more true now than ever before -
7:34 - 7:37because his belief stood up
-
7:37 - 7:39to the scrutiny of somebody yelling at him.
-
7:39 - 7:42And just a little side note:
-
7:42 - 7:43I follow the street preacher
community a little bit. -
7:43 - 7:45They love it when people argue with them.
-
7:45 - 7:47They love getting crowds.
-
7:47 - 7:49One of the worst things I think you could do
-
7:49 - 7:50is argue with a street preacher
-
7:50 - 7:53and draw a crowd because
they see that as a success. -
7:53 - 7:55So, please try to avoid
doing that if you can. -
7:56 - 7:59Now, I wasn't that aggressive
with my family members. -
7:59 - 8:01Okay, there was a brother-in-law.
-
8:01 - 8:02Maybe I was a little bit like that.
-
8:02 - 8:04[Laughter]
-
8:04 - 8:05But I'd laugh at them
-
8:05 - 8:07and I'd spend hours digging up facts
-
8:07 - 8:09to show that they were mistaken
-
8:09 - 8:11and I jeopardized those relationships
-
8:11 - 8:13and I'm still trying to rebuild them.
-
8:13 - 8:16Even though my style has
changed completely from that, -
8:16 - 8:19I'm still trying to repair
those relationships -
8:19 - 8:20and that's what kind
-
8:20 - 8:21of one of the reasons
why I'm so eager -
8:21 - 8:22to be talking to you today
-
8:22 - 8:26because I suspect that
many people have damaged -
8:26 - 8:27relationships with their loved ones
-
8:27 - 8:30and friends and co-workers and so forth.
-
8:30 - 8:32And I'm really excited to be able
-
8:32 - 8:34to tell you about this approach.
-
8:35 - 8:36So, let's talk a little bit
-
8:36 - 8:38about Street Epistemology here.
-
8:40 - 8:41Okay.
-
8:43 - 8:46I think Street Epistemology might be
-
8:46 - 8:50the best approach for having
one-on-one conversations -
8:50 - 8:53with people about their deeply held belief.
-
8:53 - 8:55I understand that that's a bold claim,
-
8:55 - 8:57but I've been doing this for five years
-
8:57 - 9:00and I've had profound
one-on-one conversations, -
9:00 - 9:01sometimes two-on-one.
-
9:01 - 9:02I'll talked to a Mormon couple.
-
9:02 - 9:06And we've talked for 30 minutes
and it was one of the best conversations -
9:06 - 9:08that I think I've ever had.
-
9:08 - 9:10So, before I could explain why I think
-
9:10 - 9:12Street Epistemology is going to be
-
9:12 - 9:14fundamental to the success of atheism
-
9:14 - 9:16--that it's a turning point
-
9:16 - 9:18--I need to explain to you
what Street Epistemology is. -
9:18 - 9:21So, the "street" part of it simply means:
-
9:21 - 9:22"laymen engagements."
-
9:22 - 9:24You're having a conversation
with somebody. -
9:24 - 9:27You're not necessarily
an expert in the Quran -
9:27 - 9:29or the Bible or what the claim is,
-
9:29 - 9:31but you can engage with them.
-
9:31 - 9:33It's actually one of the strengths
of this method, I think, -
9:33 - 9:34is that you don't really have
-
9:34 - 9:36to be well-versed in the doctrine
-
9:36 - 9:38to have these dialogues.
-
9:38 - 9:42In fact, I think the less
you know about the claim -
9:42 - 9:44the better questions you'll form
-
9:44 - 9:46when you have these conversations.
-
9:46 - 9:49So, the "epistemology" part
is the study of knowledge. -
9:49 - 9:53It's how a person determined
that their belief is true. -
9:53 - 9:55When you hear the word "epistemology",
-
9:55 - 9:56my recommendation would be:
-
9:56 - 9:58Just think of the word "method".
-
9:58 - 10:00Think of technique, think of approach.
-
10:00 - 10:02Something like that.
-
10:02 - 10:05I like to think of SE
as a tool that we can use -
10:05 - 10:07to challenge people respectfully.
-
10:10 - 10:11And this isn't my creation.
-
10:11 - 10:13I didn't come up with this.
-
10:13 - 10:14This came from a book called
-
10:14 - 10:17'A Manual for Creating Atheists'
by Dr. Peter Boghossian. -
10:17 - 10:21And it's based on the Socratic Method.
-
10:22 - 10:23I read the book,
-
10:23 - 10:25I started looking for examples online
-
10:25 - 10:27and there were no examples at all.
-
10:29 - 10:30And I would go out.
-
10:30 - 10:32I was going out to try to
do Street Epistemology. -
10:32 - 10:34There was one good "why" question in there.
-
10:34 - 10:36When I was yelling at that preacher:
-
10:36 - 10:38"Why do you think that it's true?"
-
10:38 - 10:40But there was no rapport building,
-
10:40 - 10:42the tone was horrible,
-
10:42 - 10:46and I certainly wasn't trying
to understand his methodology. -
10:46 - 10:49So, I've been going out
-
10:49 - 10:51and trying to sort of perfect that
-
10:51 - 10:53or hone this method
the last five years. -
10:53 - 10:55Here's the definition of it.
-
10:55 - 10:56Couple points of here.
-
10:56 - 10:59Street Epistemology
is a conversational tool. -
10:59 - 11:00It's not a debate.
-
11:01 - 11:05It's a polite discussion and it is a tool.
-
11:05 - 11:06It's something that you can use
-
11:06 - 11:10if the situation is appropriate
depending on your goals. -
11:10 - 11:12And the conversations tend
-
11:12 - 11:14to help people reflect or think
-
11:14 - 11:17about their belief long
after the conversation ends. -
11:18 - 11:20When I have a dialogue with somebody
-
11:20 - 11:21if they think about it then and there
-
11:21 - 11:22but never think about it again,
-
11:22 - 11:24then that's really
not much of a success to me. -
11:25 - 11:27I want these conversations
-
11:27 - 11:29to resonate with folks.
-
11:29 - 11:32And then we challenge
the method that they used. -
11:32 - 11:34Did they use a reliable method
-
11:34 - 11:36to come to that conclusion?
-
11:37 - 11:38All right.
-
11:39 - 11:40So, one of the things I think
-
11:40 - 11:42I need to kind of get
out of the way really quick -
11:42 - 11:45are some misconceptions of this,
-
11:45 - 11:47because the word "street" is in there
-
11:48 - 11:50and a lot of the examples are people
-
11:50 - 11:51going out with video cameras
-
11:51 - 11:53and uploading their conversations
-
11:53 - 11:55and they're like; "Oh, you're just like
-
11:55 - 11:57proselytizing for atheism there.
-
11:57 - 11:59�This is like Ray Comfort or something."
-
11:59 - 12:02There are no bananas
in Street Epistemology. -
12:02 - 12:03[Laughing]
-
12:03 - 12:05[Applause]
-
12:06 - 12:09Street Epistemology honestly
is about helping people. -
12:09 - 12:11It's helping people slow down
-
12:11 - 12:13and think about the belief
that they formed. -
12:13 - 12:14And did they use a reliable method.
-
12:14 - 12:16And it's not just about God claims.
-
12:16 - 12:17It could be about anything.
-
12:17 - 12:19Some of my best conversations have been
-
12:19 - 12:22with atheists who are dogmatically
sure there are no Gods. -
12:23 - 12:26SE is really good about encouraging
-
12:26 - 12:28people to be less dogmatic
-
12:28 - 12:31about the beliefs that they formed.
-
12:32 - 12:34And we try to uncover truth.
-
12:34 - 12:38Now these conversations
can be initiated or organic. -
12:38 - 12:41My preference is
to have an organic chat -
12:41 - 12:43like when I get in an Uber,
-
12:43 - 12:44I almost always have a chat
-
12:44 - 12:46with the driver about something.
-
12:46 - 12:48They make a claim and it's game on.
-
12:48 - 12:51I can start asking questions
and we usually end it on good terms -
12:51 - 12:53and they usually give me a 5 star rating.
-
12:53 - 12:55So, I think that's okay.
-
12:55 - 12:59And I do the same for them.
-
12:59 - 13:01So, I can understand how people
might make the connection -
13:01 - 13:04that this is like atheist
evangelizing or something -
13:05 - 13:09and I'm here giving a talk on Street
Epistemology to American Atheists. -
13:09 - 13:11So, I could understand how
you can make that connection. -
13:11 - 13:15But this is a tool that can be used
for all different types of claims. -
13:15 - 13:18It doesn't just have to be
about challenging people about God. -
13:18 - 13:22And this is so much about placing
a pebble in a person's shoe, -
13:22 - 13:26helping the person reflect
on their belief formation process, -
13:26 - 13:29so later, when the conversation�s over,
-
13:30 - 13:33they can ask themselves:
"Do I need to maintain this belief?" -
13:33 - 13:35"Do I need to lower
my confidence in this belief?" -
13:37 - 13:39"Should I discard this belief outright?"
-
13:40 - 13:43So, I wanted to put Street
Epistemology in graphical form. -
13:43 - 13:47Now, I have had a thousand
conversations at least. -
13:47 - 13:49I started looking at transcripts
-
13:49 - 13:52and I started noticing a little pattern:
-
13:52 - 13:54That we spend a little bit of time talking
-
13:54 - 13:55about what they believe,
-
13:55 - 13:58a little bit more time talking
about why they believe it, -
13:59 - 14:01but we spend a lot more time talking
-
14:01 - 14:03about how they determined that
that belief is true. -
14:03 - 14:08And that I think is what makes
these conversations unique, -
14:08 - 14:10and Socratic, and Street Epistemology,
-
14:10 - 14:13is that we're interested in their methodology.
-
14:13 - 14:15Here's a different way of looking at it.
-
14:16 - 14:18Same pyramid, but different words.
-
14:18 - 14:20So, we're interested in what they believe.
-
14:20 - 14:22We want to understand their reasons,
-
14:22 - 14:23their main reason,
-
14:23 - 14:26but it's the methodology
that they used. -
14:26 - 14:28So, when you think of Street
Epistemology, think "method." -
14:28 - 14:30We're very, very interested in the method.
-
14:30 - 14:32Because if the method is faulty,
-
14:33 - 14:36all the other things above it collapse.
-
14:37 - 14:38Okay.
-
14:38 - 14:42Now, that doesn't mean that
what they're believing is not true. -
14:42 - 14:43If they've based it on it
[on an unreliable foundation]. -
14:43 - 14:46I could base something on faith.
-
14:46 - 14:47I can realize it's a faulty methodology
-
14:47 - 14:50and what I'm believing
could actually still be true. -
14:50 - 14:56I get that, but ones confidence should
probably be adjusted accordingly -
14:56 - 14:59if they learned that
their method was unreliable. -
15:00 - 15:01Okay.
-
15:01 - 15:02A couple of video examples here.
-
15:04 - 15:06I want to talk to that actually.
-
15:06 - 15:10So, I was also thinking
about these little [pyramid] sections here. -
15:10 - 15:12When we talk
about what a person believes, -
15:12 - 15:15that's usually what the preacher
tells you in Church. -
15:15 - 15:17�This is what the Bible says,"
-
15:17 - 15:19�This is what we believe."
-
15:19 - 15:21When you get to the apologists,
-
15:21 - 15:22the people that defend the faith.
-
15:22 - 15:25There was a guy [during the Q&A of the previous speaker]
who said he was an apologist.. -
15:25 - 15:27These are folks that defend the faith.
-
15:27 - 15:29They come up with reasons
to justify the belief. -
15:30 - 15:30Okay.
-
15:30 - 15:32So, there's this reason level,
-
15:32 - 15:36but very few people
are looking at their foundation. -
15:37 - 15:39And that's why these questions
I think are powerful. -
15:39 - 15:42Because we're not concerned
with what you believe. -
15:42 - 15:45We're not really concerned with why,
but how did you determine that it's true. -
15:45 - 15:48And the apologists
are taken aback by this. -
15:48 - 15:49I'll get into this a little bit later.
-
15:49 - 15:51They're a little worried about this.
-
15:51 - 15:52Okay!
-
15:54 - 15:57When I first started doing this
there were no video examples. -
15:57 - 16:00Today there are hundreds and some
of my favorites are not even mine. -
16:00 - 16:03It's really neat to see other people
-
16:03 - 16:06going out, people in France and England.
-
16:07 - 16:08Finland, for example.
-
16:08 - 16:12They are going out and having talks
all across the United States. -
16:13 - 16:15And this is probably an understatement,
-
16:15 - 16:18but Street Epistemology
did not come naturally to me. -
16:19 - 16:23I was arguing with
street preacher Phil there -
16:23 - 16:26for a good year and a half, I was.
-
16:26 - 16:27But I was getting out of it.
-
16:27 - 16:32It was evolving, but uploading these
videos, as horrible as they were, -
16:32 - 16:35I was getting feedback from folks saying;
-
16:35 - 16:37"Hey, is that really Street Epistemology?"
-
16:37 - 16:40And, "Shouldn't you be asking questions
rather than telling them what to think." -
16:40 - 16:42So, it was changing
the way that I was behaving, -
16:42 - 16:45it was changing my interactions,
and I think, for the better. -
16:46 - 16:50So, I realized that it's kind of difficult
to explain what Street Epistemology is. -
16:50 - 16:52I want to show you a couple of examples.
-
16:52 - 16:55I have four little video clips,
and they're super short. -
16:55 - 16:58This next one this is a good one.
-
17:01 - 17:02A couple of things here.
-
17:02 - 17:04I'm going to make sure
not to laugh into the mic. -
17:05 - 17:07So, a couple things here.
-
17:08 - 17:11Set aside your view on pornography
whether you think it's harmful or not. -
17:11 - 17:13That's not the point of this little clip.
-
17:13 - 17:16The point is to demonstrate
the mechanics of Street Epistemology. -
17:16 - 17:18This also shows that you don't have
-
17:18 - 17:21to use Street Epistemology
for just God claims. -
17:21 - 17:22It's excellent for it,
-
17:22 - 17:25but in this case the topic
of pornography comes up here. -
17:26 - 17:28And the other takeaway, I think,
-
17:28 - 17:31is try to set aside your biases.
-
17:31 - 17:34When I'm having a dialogue with a person,
-
17:35 - 17:38my stance on pornography
is not important at this point. -
17:39 - 17:42I want to understand why HE thinks
that it's harmful for example. -
17:42 - 17:44So, that's what
this conversation is about. -
17:44 - 17:48And pay close attention to the real reason
-
17:48 - 17:51why he holds his view on pornography.
-
17:51 - 17:54IL: The scientific evidence is
-
17:54 - 17:56just like any kind of drug, you know,
-
17:56 - 17:58like, the first time you watch it.
-
17:58 - 17:59AM: Do you value scientific evidence?
-
17:59 - 18:00IL: Yeah, yeah, definitely.
-
18:00 - 18:05AM: Denzel, if we can provide you,
-
18:05 - 18:08if I can provide you or
somebody that follows us closely.. -
18:08 - 18:11If I discovered some scientific evidence
that showed that everything -
18:11 - 18:15that you've just
described very eloquently, -
18:15 - 18:18that it doesn't work in that way.
-
18:18 - 18:20They've interviewed 10,000 porn stars
-
18:20 - 18:23and a hundred thousand men and women.
-
18:23 - 18:29And the overall result
suggests that it's a positive. -
18:30 - 18:30All right.
-
18:30 - 18:33People feel better about themselves.
They�re living longer, -
18:33 - 18:37marriages are actually prospering,
-
18:37 - 18:39crime is going down, like across the board.
-
18:39 - 18:40And I don't even know
if that can even be measured, -
18:40 - 18:49but if it could,
if there was a reliable study that -
18:49 - 18:52showed something completely different
than what you're outlining just now, -
18:52 - 18:55would you change your mind on it?
-
18:56 - 18:58IL: No, I wouldn't.
-
18:58 - 19:00Because at the end of the day
-
19:00 - 19:04I do value like, you know,
scientific evidence, historical evidence -
19:04 - 19:06and that kind of stuff.
-
19:06 - 19:08But at the heart of it I'm a Christian.
-
19:08 - 19:10So, I live by a finite set of principles.
-
19:12 - 19:13Okay.
-
19:15 - 19:16That was Denzel.
-
19:17 - 19:19So, we could have
spent a lot of time wasted -
19:19 - 19:21just discussing pornography,
-
19:22 - 19:24because he admits there
that it's not based on evidence. -
19:24 - 19:26Even if he was shown evidence
-
19:26 - 19:28that it was not harmful,
he'd still hold the belief. -
19:29 - 19:32And that's what I love about
this method is that it's efficient. -
19:32 - 19:35You don't have to spend any time
arguing about things that don't matter. -
19:36 - 19:39If somebody raises contradictions
in the Bible as their reason, but they�d -
19:39 - 19:42still believe if every contradiction
was adequately explained, -
19:42 - 19:45don't discuss contradictions with them.
-
19:45 - 19:46Move on to the real reasons.
-
19:46 - 19:47Get to the core.
-
19:47 - 19:49Get to the lowest level.
-
19:49 - 19:53And that�s what I think is so great
about Street Epistemology. -
19:53 - 19:54If I were to meet with him again,
-
19:54 - 19:56I wouldn't discuss porn at all.
-
19:56 - 19:58I would talk about why
he thinks his God is real. -
19:59 - 20:01And what's really interesting is
-
20:01 - 20:03that once that God belief goes,
-
20:03 - 20:04so many other beliefs fall away.
-
20:04 - 20:06Well, and I'm sure many people
here used to believe in God.. -
20:06 - 20:08Once you lose that God belief,
-
20:08 - 20:10so many other things fall by the wayside.
-
20:11 - 20:13So, I'd love the efficiency of this approach.
-
20:14 - 20:16And you may have noticed that
-
20:16 - 20:18I didn't give him statistics
-
20:18 - 20:22to show how beneficial pornography
was or anything like that. -
20:22 - 20:24It probably would've been way more
-
20:24 - 20:25likely [this this talk] would have been
-
20:25 - 20:27a waste of time with this individual.
-
20:27 - 20:29In fact, there's this thing
called the backfire effect. -
20:30 - 20:31I don't know if I'm...
-
20:31 - 20:34Show of hands, who's heard of this before?
-
20:34 - 20:36Lots of hands, good.
Okay. -
20:37 - 20:38So, this is somewhat controversial.
-
20:38 - 20:41This is a hypothesis that suggests
-
20:41 - 20:43that if you provide people with evidence
-
20:43 - 20:44that shows that they're mistaken,
-
20:44 - 20:47especially on a belief that's
very tied to who they are, -
20:47 - 20:50they are less likely
to accept your evidence -
20:50 - 20:51and let it change their mind.
-
20:51 - 20:56Now, the backfire effect part of that
-
20:56 - 20:59is that some people even
believe what they believe even more. -
20:59 - 21:02There does seem to be some
new research that suggests that -
21:02 - 21:05people sometimes
might accept your evidence, -
21:05 - 21:09but their attitude doesn't
change about the belief. -
21:09 - 21:12So, I think we're still good
with the SE thing here. -
21:12 - 21:15And that's the beauty of this approach.
-
21:15 - 21:17We're not debating what they believe.
-
21:17 - 21:19We aren't dismissing their reasons.
-
21:19 - 21:20You don't need to know anything
-
21:20 - 21:23about their holy book
or anything like that. -
21:23 - 21:26You don't even have to provide evidence
to a person when you have these talks. -
21:26 - 21:28It kind of takes the pressure off.
-
21:28 - 21:31"I'm a questioner, help me understand,
-
21:31 - 21:33teach me why you think that this is true."
-
21:33 - 21:36When you start looking at
these conversations that way, -
21:37 - 21:38I think it's really like I said,
-
21:38 - 21:40it does take the pressure off.
-
21:40 - 21:42It makes these conversations
so much easier. -
21:46 - 21:49And somebody once described this approach
-
21:49 - 21:51as making people "comfortably uncomfortable."
-
21:51 - 21:53You may have noticed the difference
-
21:53 - 21:54between the conversation with Denzel
-
21:54 - 21:55and the one with Phil.
-
21:55 - 21:57How drastic a difference.
-
21:57 - 21:59I was asking him questions.
-
21:59 - 22:01I was listening to him,
and that type of thing. -
22:02 - 22:02Okay.
-
22:02 - 22:04One more video clip.
-
22:04 - 22:06I've got about 15-16 minutes,
it looks like, left. -
22:07 - 22:10This is Gordon.
This is two and a half minutes long. -
22:10 - 22:12He's elderly and I picked this one
-
22:12 - 22:15because a lot of the early examples
-
22:15 - 22:16that I uploaded was me interviewing
-
22:16 - 22:18college-age students on campuses
-
22:18 - 22:20and people would say
�you're just picking on young, -
22:20 - 22:22inexperienced people."
-
22:22 - 22:24So, I said "I'm gonna go
talk to some older people." -
22:24 - 22:25So, for the last two years I've been
-
22:25 - 22:27on this hiking trail, talking to people,
-
22:27 - 22:28and this is Gordon.
-
22:30 - 22:32So, there's really no age limit
-
22:32 - 22:34but during this little talk,
-
22:34 - 22:35which is two minutes long,
-
22:36 - 22:39the video will stop twice
when he says something -
22:39 - 22:42that I think would be
raw meat to an atheist. -
22:42 - 22:44Where you'd hear it and you're like:
-
22:44 - 22:46"There's no way he's
getting away with that." -
22:46 - 22:47[Laughing]
-
22:48 - 22:52So, the video pauses at those moments
-
22:52 - 22:55and a picture of my face will appear.
-
22:55 - 22:57I was gonna have a picture
of raw meat show up. -
22:57 - 23:01It's just my face like:
"Mm-hmm� in a thinker�s pose. -
23:01 - 23:02When that happens you'll be alerted
-
23:02 - 23:05to that and there's a really
big reveal at the end. -
23:05 - 23:05So, pay attention.
-
23:06 - 23:10AM: Why Gordon do you believe
that a God even exists? -
23:10 - 23:13IL: Because I was brought up a Christian.
-
23:13 - 23:17I've brought up to believe that.
-
23:18 - 23:19I mean.
-
23:19 - 23:23AM: How long have you had the belief?
-
23:23 - 23:25IL: Since I was able to think.
-
23:25 - 23:27[he laughs]
-
23:30 - 23:33And it gets stronger as I grew older.
-
23:33 - 23:34AM: Interesting.
-
23:34 - 23:35IL: Yeah.
-
23:40 - 23:46AM: Yesterday I ran into a family that
had a little four month-old baby -
23:46 - 23:47IL: Uh-huh.
-
23:47 - 23:49AM: and they identified themselves as Christians,
-
23:49 - 23:52but they could have easily been Hindus or
-
23:52 - 23:54Muslims or Pagans ...
-
23:54 - 23:56IL: Doesn't matter.
-
23:56 - 23:58Well, not Pagans.
Pagans are non-believers. -
23:58 - 24:02[Laughing]
-
24:02 - 24:04But, it doesn't matter what
what religion you come from -
24:04 - 24:07or what your ethnicity is
-
24:07 - 24:11as long as you believe in a Supreme Being.
-
24:11 - 24:13You can call him Allah or God or
-
24:13 - 24:16Neihu or whatever as long as you believe
-
24:16 - 24:19in the same being, it doesn't matter.
-
24:20 - 24:22AM: Let's say that little girl is raised
-
24:22 - 24:24to believe that there's no God.
-
24:25 - 24:27IL: Well, I feel sorry for her.
-
24:27 - 24:30[Laughing]
-
24:30 - 24:33AM: Would she be just
as correct in her belief as you -
24:33 - 24:34being raised with your belief?
-
24:36 - 24:38IL: Just as correct?
-
24:40 - 24:41No, I mean ...
-
24:41 - 24:42AM: Why not?
-
24:42 - 24:48IL: Because just we're all
created for us by God -
24:48 - 24:51and we look for eternal life
-
24:51 - 24:55and that comes through salvation.
-
24:55 - 24:58And if you don't believe in God
then you can't have salvation. -
24:58 - 25:02AM: Are you saying that if a child
-
25:02 - 25:05is raised to believe in a God,
-
25:05 - 25:08they're justified in having the belief
-
25:08 - 25:11but if a child is raised
to believe in no gods, they're not? -
25:11 - 25:13IL: A young child has no concept
-
25:13 - 25:15of what's right or wrong at that point.
-
25:15 - 25:17They believe only what they're told
-
25:17 - 25:20And so what they are taught
-
25:20 - 25:22in the first five years of life
-
25:22 - 25:25will probably be with them
for the rest of their life. -
25:25 - 25:26Which is unfortunate.
-
25:27 - 25:30[Laughing]
-
25:34 - 25:35Okay.
-
25:37 - 25:40So, because I avoided the raw meat
-
25:40 - 25:42of those two exchanges there
-
25:42 - 25:43when he said that.
-
25:43 - 25:45He said pagans are non-believers.
-
25:45 - 25:46Well, that's not true.
-
25:46 - 25:47I could have interrupted him
-
25:47 - 25:49and corrected him
and we could have gone on -
25:49 - 25:50this different tangent, but I didn't.
-
25:50 - 25:52I just let it go.
It's not important, really. -
25:52 - 25:54And then he said;
"I'd feel sorry for the little girl -
25:54 - 25:56who was raised atheist."
-
25:56 - 26:00That pisses me off.
-
26:00 - 26:02I have two kids
and they're the greatest kids. -
26:02 - 26:04But that really has nothing to do with it.
-
26:04 - 26:08But if I went ...
If I chased those distractions, -
26:08 - 26:12it would have been really
unfortunate if I had done that -
26:12 - 26:13because we wouldn't have had
-
26:13 - 26:17that wonderful discovery
at the end, really quickly. -
26:19 - 26:23It's easy to be angry
when you hear stuff like that. -
26:23 - 26:26Okay.
Because let's face it: -
26:26 - 26:30We were told lies by the people
that we love and it hurts. -
26:31 - 26:32We have a right to be angry.
-
26:32 - 26:36We really do and yet most of us
found our way out. -
26:36 - 26:37And I'm hopeful that
-
26:37 - 26:39we can channel that anger
into something positive. -
26:40 - 26:41Try to let those things slide
-
26:41 - 26:43for the benefit of the conversation,
-
26:43 - 26:45for the benefit of the discovery.
-
26:45 - 26:48Like I did there with our friend Gordon.
-
26:48 - 26:50Alright.
I've got one more clip -
26:50 - 26:52Gosh, I just have 10 minutes left.
-
26:52 - 26:54I think I'm going to skip this clip
-
26:54 - 26:56That kills me to do that.
-
26:57 - 26:59[Protest from the public]
-
27:00 - 27:02It's not in my control.
I'm sorry. -
27:04 - 27:07[Laughter]
-
27:09 - 27:11This clip that's this minute...
-
27:11 - 27:13I'm trying to decide where to go here.
-
27:13 - 27:14Alright, let's stop talking about it.
-
27:14 - 27:15I'm gonna show you one more clip.
-
27:15 - 27:17I talked about the angry atheist.
-
27:17 - 27:19This is Joanna, and we're on a trail.
-
27:19 - 27:22She said she was ninety percent
confident that God it was real. -
27:22 - 27:24She pumps it up to a hundred
after ten minutes into the talk. -
27:24 - 27:26This is about twenty minutes into the talk.
-
27:26 - 27:28It's a five-minute chat
-
27:28 - 27:30and I want you to notice
-
27:30 - 27:33her thinker's pose.
And notice the pacing of this, -
27:33 - 27:35notice the calm nature of it,
-
27:35 - 27:38notice the respect and the attention,
-
27:38 - 27:40and the intention of
wanting to fully understand -
27:40 - 27:41what she's saying.
-
27:45 - 27:47AM: If this belief that's in your head
-
27:47 - 27:50and this hundred percent certainty
-
27:50 - 27:54that the God exists
-
27:54 - 27:58is based on a foundation of you being
raised and taught something, -
27:59 - 28:03how can you be certain
that it's actually true? -
28:04 - 28:07IL: That's kind of like we
we�re talking about earlier. -
28:07 - 28:11It's very faith-based.
-
28:11 - 28:14AM: We're gonna to definitely have
to unpack this faith based thing. -
28:14 - 28:16IL: It's pretty broad.
-
28:16 - 28:17Um ...
-
28:18 - 28:19AM: On what is a faith based...
-
28:19 - 28:22IL: "Faith based" is that you can't see Him.
-
28:22 - 28:24You can't always hear Him.
-
28:24 - 28:27You just have to believe that
-
28:27 - 28:29He'll pull through for your favor.
-
28:29 - 28:30And even if it isn't in your favor,
-
28:30 - 28:32that can work into your favor somehow.
-
28:32 - 28:35'Cause a lot of negative
things happen in life, -
28:35 - 28:40but really depends
on which route you take. -
28:40 - 28:41But...
-
28:42 - 28:43Gosh...
-
28:43 - 28:44How...
-
28:44 - 28:47That's the only way to put it too.
-
28:47 - 28:50I just think it's something
that's inside of you as well. -
28:50 - 28:52Which could go along other religions, too.
-
28:53 - 28:54'Cause, like, being out in nature
-
28:54 - 28:55gives you a lot of peace.
-
28:55 - 28:58When I pray I have a lot of peace.
-
28:58 - 29:00I feel like I have more direction.
-
29:00 - 29:02I pause and reflect more.
-
29:05 - 29:05You know.
-
29:05 - 29:09You can never be...
-
29:09 - 29:10Ahh...
-
29:10 - 29:12kind of like you're thinking
about that 90%, but... -
29:14 - 29:16I don't know how else to put it!
-
29:16 - 29:17That's hard.
-
29:17 - 29:21I haven't actually talked that out
with somebody before fully. -
29:21 - 29:22I don't really have words.
-
29:22 - 29:24AM: That's fine.
-
29:24 - 29:26Now can I ask you one more question
and then we'll wrap it up? -
29:26 - 29:27IL: Yeah.
-
29:35 - 29:38AM: I suppose my question is:
-
29:38 - 29:46if you couldn't use faith
to conclude that your God exists, -
29:46 - 29:49to know with 100% level of confidence...
-
29:49 - 29:54If a faith-based foundation
wasn't an option for you, -
29:54 - 29:55IL: Mmm-hmm.
-
29:56 - 30:01where do you think you would be in terms
of your confidence that God existed. -
30:02 - 30:05IL: It wouldn't be very high.
-
30:05 - 30:07Because like I said before, there's not really ...
-
30:07 - 30:10He's not literally standing
in front of us, right now? -
30:10 - 30:12IF that makes sense. I mean ...
-
30:14 - 30:16AM: So, you can't see Him,
you can't hear ... -
30:17 - 30:20IL: A lot of people kind of need
concrete things in front of them -
30:20 - 30:23in order to kind of have that 100% ... faith.
-
30:23 - 30:24Not faith-based, sorry.
-
30:24 - 30:27100% trust in something.
-
30:27 - 30:31Especially something that you
base your whole life off of. -
30:31 - 30:35I feel like if you don't have ...
-
30:35 - 30:39Faith is one of those things where you
don't always feel like you're in control. -
30:39 - 30:43And I feel like as humans
we always like to have control. -
30:43 - 30:45It's another thing where I kind of stray
-
30:45 - 30:47everyone kind of strays off of their path,
-
30:47 - 30:49but I always find my way back.
-
30:49 - 30:50AM: Okay.
-
30:51 - 30:54May I ask you one more question.
-
30:54 - 30:56And I promise this will be
the last one unless you say: -
30:56 - 30:59"Please, keep asking me questions."
But this is my last. -
31:03 - 31:05In these conversations
-
31:05 - 31:07that I've had with lots of people
-
31:07 - 31:10regardless of what God they believe in
-
31:10 - 31:12and regardless of how they were raised.
-
31:12 - 31:15They will often say that
"I believe it because of faith." -
31:15 - 31:17I can't see the God.
I can't hear the God. -
31:17 - 31:20But I believe it and they are believing
-
31:20 - 31:24in completely different
deities, wildly different. -
31:24 - 31:25IL: Yeah.
-
31:25 - 31:30So, my last question to you is:
-
31:30 - 31:32[Sounds]
-
31:33 - 31:37Is faith a reliable way to come
to know something to be true, -
31:37 - 31:43if anyone can use it for anything?
-
31:44 - 31:46IL: That's a good question.
-
31:46 - 31:47Oh. Wow!
-
31:51 - 31:53You got me there.
-
31:55 - 31:57It doesn't change what I believe.
-
31:57 - 31:58But ...
-
32:01 - 32:02You actually have a good point.
-
32:02 - 32:05A lot of religions are a lot of faith ...
-
32:05 - 32:07Um, is faith-based.
-
32:11 - 32:12AM: I beg your pardon.
-
32:12 - 32:15Is there another way you can ask that?
-
32:16 - 32:19IL: Or is it a question or is it kind
of like an open-ended ... -
32:19 - 32:22AM: We can certainly end it on that point
and if you want to... -
32:22 - 32:25you seem like a thinker and
if you want to think about it -
32:25 - 32:26And we can ...
-
32:26 - 32:28And if I never hear from you again
-
32:28 - 32:29that's fine but if you want to ping me,
-
32:29 - 32:30I can give you my email address.
-
32:30 - 32:31IL: Yeah.
-
32:32 - 32:34AM: I can rephrase it,
to leave it with you one more time. -
32:34 - 32:36You can think about it
I'll give you the card. -
32:36 - 32:37So, I suppose the final question
-
32:37 - 32:40that you can either answer now
-
32:40 - 32:44or just think about it would be:
-
32:45 - 32:52If anyone can use faith
to conclude that anything is true, -
32:52 - 32:55why on earth would they
want to use that method? -
32:56 - 32:57IL: Mmm-hmm.
-
32:58 - 33:00That's a good one.
-
33:00 - 33:01I'm going to ponder.
-
33:01 - 33:03I'm definitely a thinker.
-
33:11 - 33:13I have five minutes here.
-
33:13 - 33:16So, just really quick.
-
33:16 - 33:18Did you notice the pacing of it?
-
33:18 - 33:20Did you notice that it was calm?
I was asking questions. -
33:20 - 33:22I wasn't telling her a damn thing.
-
33:22 - 33:24I was just giving her
some of my observations. -
33:24 - 33:26I was telling a story like
the previous speaker had mentioned. -
33:26 - 33:28The importance of storytelling.
-
33:28 - 33:32Now this approach is freaking
out professional believers. -
33:32 - 33:35They're worried about it
because I think they would -
33:35 - 33:39rather see us argue like I did there
with street preacher Phil. -
33:41 - 33:43It's a lot easier to demonize an atheist
-
33:43 - 33:46when I'm behaving like that as opposed to
-
33:46 - 33:48when I'm having a cordial conversation
-
33:48 - 33:52with somebody like Joanna there.
-
33:52 - 33:53Okay. I've got one more video
and we got like three minutes left. -
33:53 - 33:54So, let�s wrap this up.
-
33:54 - 33:56This one is one and a half minutes long
-
33:56 - 33:58and I'm showing you this video
-
33:58 - 34:00because this one is so cool.
-
34:00 - 34:04It's this couple, we start talking
how this fellow is getting pressure from one... -
34:04 - 34:07He's a Christian.
He's hundred percent sure yet he's getting -
34:07 - 34:08pressure from one of his friends
-
34:08 - 34:09who's a Jehovah's Witness.
-
34:09 - 34:13And we had this wonderful conversation.
-
34:13 - 34:14His wife came up and listened mostly.
-
34:14 - 34:19And he's extolling the virtues
of the conversation that he just had -
34:19 - 34:20where I was using this approach.
-
34:20 - 34:22IL: But you got me thinking though, Anthony!
-
34:22 - 34:23I might have to email you.
-
34:23 - 34:24James ...
-
34:24 - 34:26AM: Nothing will make me happier.
-
34:26 - 34:28[continues giving his email]
-
34:29 - 34:31IL: Don't put it in the junk folder!
-
34:31 - 34:32AM: I'll be watching for it.
-
34:32 - 34:33AM: Yeah, hit me up.
-
34:33 - 34:35I'd really like to find out if there's
-
34:35 - 34:38a better way to conclude
that this God exists -
34:38 - 34:39other than the reasons
that you gave me. -
34:39 - 34:42Do you find that the reasons
-
34:42 - 34:43that you've explained to me,
-
34:43 - 34:44very great, very well...
-
34:44 - 34:46IL: That's a good question for my friend...
-
34:46 - 34:48That's a good question for him.
-
34:48 - 34:48AM: Why?
-
34:48 - 34:51IL: 'Cause he's so strong in his beliefs!
-
34:51 - 34:52AM: Mmmm.
-
34:52 - 34:53IL: You know?
-
34:53 - 34:53My buddy, Gilbert.
-
34:53 - 34:55He's so strong in his beliefs,
-
34:55 - 34:56I'm going to ask him:
-
34:56 - 34:59"Hey, is there..."
-
34:59 - 35:00"How sure are you?"
-
35:00 - 35:01"How?"
-
35:01 - 35:02And I'm going to see what his...
-
35:02 - 35:05I think his answers are going to be
similar to what I just gave you. -
35:05 - 35:06But I'm going to ask him.
-
35:06 - 35:08AM: You know what I think would be really cool
-
35:08 - 35:09is if you were to learn
about Street Epistemology, -
35:09 - 35:11watch a couple of my videos
-
35:11 - 35:11and then engage with your friend.
-
35:11 - 35:12IL: You got videos on that website?
-
35:12 - 35:13AM: Yeah.
-
35:13 - 35:16If you email me
I'll send you the link to my channel -
35:16 - 35:17IL: Okay.
-
35:17 - 35:18AM: And you can check them out.
-
35:18 - 35:19IL: All right.
-
35:19 - 35:21AM: Thank you so much,
really, really enjoyed it. -
35:21 - 35:23Lovely talk, thank you. Bye.
-
35:24 - 35:24Got me thinking now!
-
35:24 - 35:28Good thing I don't have to work today!
-
35:28 - 35:30[Laughter]
-
35:30 - 35:32[Applause]
-
35:32 - 35:33James!
-
35:38 - 35:40If you'd like to learn how to do that,
-
35:40 - 35:42we get into a lot more detail.
-
35:42 - 35:45We had a workshop yesterday.
-
35:45 - 35:47The organizers here were kind enough
-
35:47 - 35:49to schedule another one for
tomorrow at noon in another room. -
35:49 - 35:51In that room over there.
-
35:51 - 35:53You'll find it.
-
35:53 - 35:54So it's at Noon tomorrow.
-
35:54 - 35:56We are tabling as well.
And just to wrap this up... -
35:56 - 35:58I've got two minutes.
-
35:58 - 35:59Let me just wrap it up.
-
35:59 - 36:03I do think that's this method is changing
the way atheists interact with believers. -
36:03 - 36:07And it's harder for believers to say:
-
36:07 - 36:11"Don't talk to that person because
she's asking hard questions." -
36:11 - 36:15If you have the truth it should stand up
to the scrutiny of some simple questions. -
36:15 - 36:18And did you notice in that video
how James was picking up that -
36:18 - 36:20I was asked him "how" questions?
-
36:20 - 36:22"How did he figure out that that's true?"
-
36:22 - 36:24So, he was getting it there at the end.
-
36:24 - 36:26And I really do think that
-
36:26 - 36:31when the history books are written
on the success of atheism in America -
36:31 - 36:34that there will be chapters
on Street Epistemology. -
36:34 - 36:36So, my question to you is:
-
36:36 - 36:40"Are you willing and able
to help us make that happen?" -
36:40 - 36:43Thank you very much.
-
36:43 - 36:47[Applause]
- Title:
- Anthony Magnabosco - Street Epistemology: A Turning Point for Atheism
- Description:
-
American Atheists 2018 National Convention
Anthony Magnabosco is a worldwide promoter and practitioner of Street Epistemology, which is a conversational method for respectfully challenging claims by asking probing questions to uncover the reliability of one's belief formation process.
He has appeared on The Thinking Atheist, The Atheist Experience, The David Pakman Show, Cognitive Dissonance, The Friendly Atheist Podcast and blog, as well as several other podcasts and shows. Anthony has inspected hundreds of people’s beliefs using this approach, frequently uploads videos of those discussions to his YouTube channel, and has given several talks, interviews and workshops on the subject. Be prepared to question your own conclusions on how to effectively engage with a God believer or anyone else who happens to make a claim!
Learn more at: https://streetepistemology.com/
His channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/magnabosco210/AMERICAN ATHEISTS is a national 501(c)(3) organization that defends civil rights for atheists, freethinkers, and other nonbelievers; works for the total separation of religion and government; and addresses issues of First Amendment public policy. Follow our updates on Twitter and Facebook.
Official Website: https://www.atheists.org/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AmericanAtheist
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AmericanAtheists - Video Language:
- English
- Duration:
- 36:52
Rik Delaet edited English subtitles for Anthony Magnabosco - Street Epistemology: A Turning Point for Atheism | ||
Rik Delaet edited English subtitles for Anthony Magnabosco - Street Epistemology: A Turning Point for Atheism | ||
Rik Delaet edited English subtitles for Anthony Magnabosco - Street Epistemology: A Turning Point for Atheism | ||
Rik Delaet edited English subtitles for Anthony Magnabosco - Street Epistemology: A Turning Point for Atheism | ||
Rik Delaet edited English subtitles for Anthony Magnabosco - Street Epistemology: A Turning Point for Atheism | ||
Rik Delaet edited English subtitles for Anthony Magnabosco - Street Epistemology: A Turning Point for Atheism | ||
Rik Delaet edited English subtitles for Anthony Magnabosco - Street Epistemology: A Turning Point for Atheism | ||
Rik Delaet edited English subtitles for Anthony Magnabosco - Street Epistemology: A Turning Point for Atheism |