Press Conference: Yanis Varoufakis & Democracy in Europe Movement 25
-
0:00 - 0:14English subtitles
-
0:14 - 0:27Good morning. We officially start the press conference
of DiEM Democracy in Europe Movement. -
0:28 - 0:31This is Yanis Varoufakis as you probably
know. My name is Srecko Horvat. -
0:32 - 0:40We are only one of the representatives of many
people, who already joined the movement
and today during the day you will see what it is about. -
0:41 - 0:47And we have half an hour for the press conference
and later we must continue with our strategical meetings. -
0:48 - 1:03So, just a short introduction: In 1969 Theodor Adorno gave an interview
for Der Spiegel. And the journalist asked the question
"Herr Professor, two months ago world still seemed in order." -
1:04 - 1:07And you know, what Adorno answered?
-
1:07 - 1:09"Not to me!"
-
1:10 - 1:17And I think it's the same: Maybe to some people the
European Union seems to be fine. But for us, and
especially from Yanis' experience -
1:17 - 1:21as the Greek finance minister, it didn't seem 'in Ordnung zu sein.'
-
1:21 - 1:42Last year the German society for language announced
that the three most popular words of the last year were
on the first place Refugees, on the second place je suis Charlie and on the third place "Grexit." -
1:43 - 1:52On the tenth place it was "Wir können es
schaffen" I think which is Merkel's quote
regarding the refugee crisis. -
1:52 - 1:55What we want to do is actually to put "Wir
können es schaffen" on the first place. -
1:55 - 2:01And that is the reason why we are founding
together with other comrades from all around Europe the Democracy in Europe Movement. -
2:02 - 2:08But I will give you the word now and then
we answer questions. I think it's better for
the press conference. -
2:08 - 2:12Well, let me welcome you to this press conference.
Thank you so much for coming. -
2:12 - 2:19It's a great honour, a privilege, to be in
the heart of Europe, in Berlin. -
2:19 - 2:27We've chosen Berlin, precisely because
nothing can change in the progressive
direction without -
2:27 - 2:32the full participation of Germany in
our European endeavors. -
2:33 - 2:41Unfortunately it is the conviction of some of
us, those of us, who are putting DiEM together, -
2:41 - 2:46that the European Union is disintegrating
and it is doing so quite fast! -
2:47 - 2:50Whether you're talking about the Euro-crisis,
-
2:50 - 2:57the failure, the spectacular failure of
the European Union, both as a Union and -
2:58 - 3:02also as it's constituent members to
dealing with the refugee crisis -
3:02 - 3:04in a sensible, rational, humanist way
-
3:04 - 3:08With a possible exception of Angela
Merkel, who's been very good at this. -
3:08 - 3:16The phenomenon of the
re-nationalization of ambition -
3:17 - 3:20The nationalization of hope
-
3:20 - 3:25The fact, that we now have European gouvernments
-
3:25 - 3:29adopting fully the "Not in my backyard"-mentality
-
3:30 - 3:32Whether this is about debt , about refugees
-
3:33 - 3:37about Schengen, about geopolitics,
about our attitude to -
3:38 - 3:39the Middle East, to Lybia,
-
3:39 - 3:43You only have to put together the words "European"
-
3:43 - 3:46"foreign" and "policy" to end up with a joke.
-
3:46 - 3:49Or the worse: "European," "Migration" and "policy"
-
3:50 - 3:51to end up, with a joke.
-
3:53 - 3:56Why is Europe disintegrating?
-
3:57 - 4:00The wrong in the thought of it, is that we have allowed
-
4:01 - 4:05for the last decade - two decades - possibly three
-
4:05 - 4:09decades, a process of de-politicizing decision-making
-
4:09 - 4:12at the heart of Europe, in our core-European institutions.
-
4:13 - 4:17And when you de-politicize a political decision process
-
4:17 - 4:20you end up with very bad politics and sub-stand-up
-
4:20 - 4:22economic politics. And now we have
-
4:22 - 4:25- this is at least our estimation - a vicious cycle.
-
4:25 - 4:29Bad policy leads to bad economic outcomes like
-
4:30 - 4:33negative interest rates, facing pension funds in Germany
-
4:33 - 4:37or deflation in Spain. These bad economic outcomes
-
4:38 - 4:43give the bureaucratic-technocratic decision making process
-
4:43 - 4:47more of an incentive, to turn to further degrees of
-
4:47 - 4:51authoritarianism. The extra-degrees of authoritarianism
-
4:51 - 4:56lead to more entrenchment in the bad policy framework.
-
4:56 - 4:57Which leads to further bad outcomes
-
4:58 - 5:02and we are in a kind of early 1930's
-
5:02 - 5:05framework of disintegration.
-
5:06 - 5:10The art to this mix, an extraordinary shock like the refugees
-
5:10 - 5:13and you end up with a situation we're facing in Europe today
-
5:13 - 5:17so we ask ourselves a very simple question:
-
5:17 - 5:22If our analysis is right, if the European Union is disintegrating
-
5:22 - 5:24because of its terrible gouvernance and architecture
-
5:25 - 5:26what is the solution?
-
5:26 - 5:28Well, we know what is not the solution:
-
5:29 - 5:31The solution is not to return to the nation-state.
-
5:31 - 5:33The solution is not to build walls, again.
-
5:33 - 5:37The solution is not "Fortress Germany," "Fortress France"
-
5:38 - 5:42"Fortress Greece" Fortress, fortresses everywhere
-
5:42 - 5:46Those walls simply reflect our security-love failures.
-
5:46 - 5:47That's not the solution.
-
5:48 - 5:51It is also not the solution - ostrich-like - to burry
-
5:52 - 5:54heads in the sand to pretend that we are
-
5:54 - 5:56on the right path and we only need to tweak our
-
5:56 - 5:58policies a little bit. So, if these are not the solutions,
-
5:59 - 6:00what are the solutions?
-
6:00 - 6:07Well, our answer to this poignant question is a search
-
6:07 - 6:10for democratizing the European Union institutions
-
6:11 - 6:15to achieve two things: Firstly to recalibrate
-
6:15 - 6:19existing institutions and policies. In order to stabilize
-
6:19 - 6:24the five crisis that are disintegrating Europe: Debt, banking,
-
6:24 - 6:28low investment everywhere, including in Germany,
-
6:28 - 6:32rising poverty, which fuels misanthropy and other nationalism
-
6:32 - 6:34and migration.
-
6:35 - 6:37And to do this, in a way
-
6:37 - 6:40that re-legitimizes political power
-
6:40 - 6:42and re-politicizes politics in Europe.
-
6:43 - 6:44How can this happen?
-
6:45 - 6:47The old-fashioned system
-
6:47 - 6:49of creating a political party
-
6:49 - 6:50in the context of a nation-state,
-
6:50 - 6:52making promises that you cannot fulfill
-
6:52 - 6:53once you are in power
-
6:53 - 6:55if you ever gain gouvernment
-
6:56 - 6:57That system is finished.
-
6:59 - 7:02I have watched mighty finance ministers including
-
7:02 - 7:04this country's
-
7:04 - 7:07being reduced to a state of helplessness
-
7:07 - 7:09in the context of European Union Council
-
7:09 - 7:10in the context of the EURO-group
-
7:11 - 7:12So, if we are right,
-
7:13 - 7:14that another political party
-
7:15 - 7:17another organization in the context of the
-
7:17 - 7:19nation-states is the wrong way to go,
-
7:19 - 7:21What is the only alternative?
-
7:21 - 7:22The only alternative is to try
-
7:22 - 7:24something you've never tried before.
-
7:25 - 7:26A political movement
-
7:26 - 7:27that starts everywhere in Europe
-
7:28 - 7:29at once, cross-border
-
7:30 - 7:33independently of prior political party-affiliations
-
7:35 - 7:38that has one simple objective:
-
7:38 - 7:40To get Europeans around a metaphorical table
-
7:41 - 7:44digital table; in forms like this one
-
7:44 - 7:46tonight. To discuss as Europeans
-
7:46 - 7:47their common problems
-
7:47 - 7:49and what we want are common solutions
-
7:49 - 7:51to these common problems to be.
-
7:51 - 7:53The hope is that, if the consensus emerges
-
7:53 - 7:55and our consensus will find ways of
-
7:55 - 7:56expressing itself on the level of
-
7:57 - 7:59the municipality, of the origin, of the state,
-
7:59 - 8:02of the European Union,
-
8:03 - 8:04We are very much looking forward
-
8:05 - 8:06to answering your many and
-
8:06 - 8:09pressing questions!
-
8:10 - 8:12So, let's start with a question here.
-
8:16 - 8:19Q: "President Erdogan of Turkey has today
-
8:19 - 8:21it seems threatened Europe saying that
-
8:21 - 8:25if Turkey doesn't receive financing
-
8:25 - 8:28he will send masses of refugees
-
8:28 - 8:29towards the EU.
-
8:30 - 8:32How do these type of threats challenge
-
8:32 - 8:34the aims that you're putting forward?
-
8:37 - 8:39A: These threats, the clear and present
-
8:39 - 8:41dangers that we're facing
-
8:41 - 8:42enhance the point.
-
8:42 - 8:45It is about time, that we decided to
-
8:46 - 8:47treat the problem as a common one.
-
8:47 - 8:49Not as a Greek problem.
-
8:49 - 8:52Not as a problem to be sorted out by
-
8:52 - 8:54turning Greece or Italy or Sicily
-
8:55 - 8:57into a concentration camp.
-
8:57 - 9:01But as the common problem of a large
-
9:01 - 9:04Union, a powerful Union, a rich Union
-
9:05 - 9:07which has failed spectacularly over the
-
9:08 - 9:10last weeks, last months, and years
-
9:10 - 9:12to deal with common problems,
-
9:12 - 9:14systemic problems - systematically.
-
9:14 - 9:17So the whole raison d'etre of what
-
9:17 - 9:21we're doing is to be able to look Mister
-
9:21 - 9:23Adorno in the eye, as Europeans
-
9:24 - 9:25with a coherent policy
-
9:25 - 9:29which is consistent also with coherent
-
9:29 - 9:31policies in the realm of solidarity
-
9:31 - 9:33within Europe
-
9:33 - 9:35Economic stabilization
-
9:35 - 9:39and an end to the race to the bottom
-
9:39 - 9:42which is forcing Europe into the bossom
-
9:42 - 9:44of disintegration.
-
9:44 - 9:47Q: It does not help if you are playing
-
9:47 - 9:48brinkmanship with these types of states
-
9:48 - 9:50does it, when you're trying to deal as
-
9:50 - 9:53a Europe, but your partners outside
-
9:53 - 9:55of Europe are willing to hold this gun
-
9:55 - 9:57to your head.
-
9:57 - 9:59A: Well, unity's strength!
-
9:59 - 10:03When a gun is being held to our head,
-
10:03 - 10:05the last thing we need is a situation
-
10:05 - 10:07where Berlin turn against Athens
-
10:07 - 10:09Athens turns against Paris
-
10:09 - 10:11Paris turns against Bratislava..
-
10:12 - 10:16The next question, please
-
10:16 - 10:17The man behind, here.
-
10:17 - 10:18Q: You said you wanted to start a movement
-
10:18 - 10:19in all European countries at once
-
10:19 - 10:22What makes you believe that you can
-
10:22 - 10:24achieve, what all social movements,
-
10:24 - 10:27protest movements or ATTAC for example
-
10:27 - 10:28has not achieved so far
-
10:28 - 10:29and have bitterly failed?
-
10:30 - 10:32A: Absolutely nothing.
-
10:32 - 10:34But it's the only way I can wake up in
-
10:34 - 10:36the morning and be energized
-
10:36 - 10:39to that, what I think, is right.
-
10:39 - 10:43Look, Harald: 2015 was a pivotal year.
-
10:43 - 10:48It was a year, when we failed
-
10:48 - 10:53as Europe - quite substantially to deal
-
10:53 - 10:57with an economic policy, which condemned
-
10:58 - 11:02large parts of the periphery to
-
11:02 - 11:04permanent depression.
-
11:04 - 11:05Permanent depression!
-
11:05 - 11:07While at the very same time condemning
-
11:07 - 11:10surplus economies, core-economies like
-
11:10 - 11:12Germany, like Netherlands, and so on
-
11:12 - 11:16to a slow burning deflationary process
-
11:17 - 11:20which is undermining confidence in
-
11:20 - 11:23the core-countries regarding the capacity
-
11:23 - 11:26of the European Union and gouvernments
-
11:26 - 11:28in Berlin, in The Netherlands, and so on
-
11:28 - 11:30to deal with the situation.
-
11:30 - 11:33For the very first time - just let me
-
11:33 - 11:36say one thing - for the very first time
-
11:36 - 11:39there is a possibility of a coalition
-
11:39 - 11:40of democrats.
-
11:40 - 11:42Whether they are liberal democrats,
-
11:42 - 11:45social democrats, radical democrats,
-
11:45 - 11:47green democrats.
-
11:47 - 11:512015 has pointed out to many people
-
11:51 - 11:53that our system of gouvernance in Europe
-
11:53 - 11:55is not consistent
-
11:55 - 11:57with shared prosperity.
-
11:57 - 11:59Now, maybe what we are doing is going
-
11:59 - 12:02to allow this coalition to come into
-
12:02 - 12:04being. Something that previous movements
-
12:04 - 12:06have not succeeded in doing. Remember
-
12:06 - 12:09that defenders of capitalism, of free
-
12:09 - 12:14market, propose, put forward a view
-
12:14 - 12:18that the reason that capitalism is dynamic, is because
-
12:18 - 12:20it's a trial and error-process
-
12:20 - 12:24where the market determines out of many
-
12:24 - 12:27failures what the success-score is.
-
12:27 - 12:29Well, maybe we need to try out many different
-
12:29 - 12:31movements in order to come to the
-
12:31 - 12:33one, that allows Europe to integrate
-
12:33 - 12:35as opposed to disintegrate.
-
12:35 - 12:37Maybe this movement will also be
-
12:37 - 12:40failure as you say, but we have to keep
-
12:40 - 12:43trying until the evolutionary process
-
12:43 - 12:46the historical process in Europe
-
12:46 - 12:48is put into the direction, onto the
-
12:48 - 12:50pathway towards integration
-
12:50 - 12:54And in a mode, that arrests the current
-
12:54 - 12:55deconstruction.
-
12:56 - 12:58OK - we take one more question from
-
12:58 - 13:00the right. And the we turn to the left.
-
13:02 - 13:04Q: I want to ask you about media-
-
13:04 - 13:07terminology and Orwellianism
-
13:07 - 13:08Corporate media here in Germany
-
13:08 - 13:11and in the US uses terms like
-
13:11 - 13:13structural adjustments,
-
13:13 - 13:14labour market flexibility,
-
13:14 - 13:16rescue packages,
-
13:16 - 13:18as if the whole nation was rescued,
-
13:18 - 13:20Savings program, Noam Chomsky says
-
13:20 - 13:22liberal market flexibility is another
-
13:22 - 13:24term for a person not knowing if
-
13:24 - 13:26he wakes up tomorrow with a job.
-
13:26 - 13:28So, I want to ask you if your movement
-
13:28 - 13:31will take these terminologies and change
-
13:31 - 13:33them around to provide a more accurate picture
-
13:33 - 13:35to what's happening on ground.
-
13:35 - 13:38A: Well, we should all, every single one of
-
13:38 - 13:41us, beware Orwellian Doublespeak.
-
13:41 - 13:45And the way which language is twisted
-
13:45 - 13:49in order to hide what's underlaying
-
13:49 - 13:53particular sentences and policies.
-
13:53 - 13:56And effectively to throw rays of light
-
13:56 - 13:58and transparency and what people
-
13:58 - 14:01actually mean. Would it not be good,
-
14:01 - 14:03if our language was useful in the
-
14:03 - 14:06content of a dialog, so what we meant
-
14:06 - 14:07was conveyed to our interlocutors.
-
14:08 - 14:12My favourite one is an example of
-
14:13 - 14:15such Doublespeak. During our
-
14:15 - 14:16negotiations with The Troika,
-
14:16 - 14:20the term they used for reducing pensions
-
14:20 - 14:25"Intergenerational restoration of justice"
-
14:25 - 14:29Yes, please.
-
14:33 - 14:35Q: ..."Radical Lefts?"
-
14:35 - 14:41A: If you read our manifesto - hm -
-
14:41 - 14:45it is quite clear, that it's a manifesto
-
14:45 - 14:47for the democratization of Europe and
-
14:47 - 14:50it is an open call to all democrats
-
14:50 - 14:53independently of ideologies,
-
14:53 - 14:55conceptions of the good society
-
14:55 - 14:58political party-affiliation. Now, I
-
14:58 - 15:00of course, like you, like all of us
-
15:00 - 15:02we have our particular prejudices
-
15:02 - 15:05our particular ideological take.
-
15:05 - 15:08But DiEM is not me, not Srecko,
-
15:08 - 15:11it's not any of the people who will be
-
15:11 - 15:13at the Volksbühne tonight.
-
15:13 - 15:15It's all of us together and it is
-
15:15 - 15:20it's manifest.
-
15:20 - 15:22It's as good as the word of the manifesto
-
15:22 - 15:25that it seeks to embrace every one
-
15:25 - 15:28who cares about re-democratizing
-
15:28 - 15:30putting the demos back into democracy
-
15:30 - 15:33in Europe.
-
15:33 - 15:34Q: Do you really think that Center-left / center-right can be with?
-
15:34 - 15:37A: This is, what we want. You see,
-
15:37 - 15:42Some of my greatest political friends
-
15:42 - 15:47associates, if you want "collaborators"
-
15:48 - 15:51are people who'd be described in Britain
-
15:51 - 15:53as Thatcher-Rights, as new-liberals.
-
15:53 - 15:57People, who are incensed by the
-
15:57 - 15:59vacuum of democracy, the lack of
-
15:59 - 16:01democracy in Brussels, in Frankfurt
-
16:01 - 16:02in the institutions of Europe
-
16:02 - 16:05which are doing such a bad job at managing
-
16:05 - 16:07Europe. If I can be friends with these
-
16:07 - 16:08people, I think it is perfectly possible
-
16:08 - 16:12for DiEM to embrace every one
-
16:12 - 16:16who simply agrees on the necessity
-
16:17 - 16:21of re-politicizing politics in order
-
16:21 - 16:23to arrest the economic crisis
-
16:23 - 16:27and the crisis of excessive authoritarianism
-
16:27 - 16:29in this democracy-free zone, which is
-
16:29 - 16:33Brussels and Frankfurt.
-
16:44 - 16:47Q: Re-democratization also means to
-
16:47 - 16:49defend the constitutions of the
-
16:49 - 16:51member-states?
-
16:51 - 16:54A: The problem with... Of course!
-
16:54 - 16:57We are constitutionalist-democrats.
-
16:57 - 16:59But let me say this to you Sir:
-
16:59 - 17:02The moment, we created a common currency,
-
17:02 - 17:05we transferred sovereignty
-
17:05 - 17:08from our nation-states into a black hole.
-
17:08 - 17:10We didn't create a federation,
-
17:10 - 17:12if we had created a federal gouvernment
-
17:12 - 17:14we had transferred our sovereignty
-
17:14 - 17:17from the nation-state to the federal state.
-
17:17 - 17:19And we would need a constitution
-
17:19 - 17:21to do that, that will be over-arching
-
17:21 - 17:23and towering above the constitutions
-
17:23 - 17:25of our nation-states. We didn't do that.
-
17:25 - 17:28So, now there's no sovereignty.
-
17:28 - 17:29Now there is just opacity, there is
-
17:29 - 17:34authoritarianism, there are officials
-
17:34 - 17:38that you or maybe you know who they are and
-
17:38 - 17:39what they are called, but the crashing
-
17:39 - 17:42majority of Europeans have never even
-
17:42 - 17:43seen their face or heard their names
-
17:43 - 17:45who make the important - crucial -
-
17:45 - 17:47decisions, behind their backs
-
17:47 - 17:49And the problem is
-
17:49 - 17:50that the vast majority of Europeans,
-
17:50 - 17:54whether they agree with me or not,
-
17:54 - 17:57feel that there is this lack of legitimacy
-
17:57 - 17:59that problem with this is, that in the
-
17:59 - 18:02context of an deflationary spiral
-
18:02 - 18:04with refugee crisis that are not being
-
18:04 - 18:06dealt with collectively
-
18:06 - 18:08there is a very serious danger
-
18:08 - 18:10that this discontent
-
18:10 - 18:11for the lack of legitimacy
-
18:11 - 18:13and the disrespect to the constitutions
-
18:13 - 18:16without having an over-arching federal
-
18:16 - 18:18constitution, leads to
-
18:18 - 18:22disintegration, to nationalism, to an
-
18:22 - 18:24attempt to recoil back into the
-
18:24 - 18:27nation state. In other words
-
18:27 - 18:28to put it very so simply
-
18:28 - 18:31A postmodern version of the 1930's
-
18:31 - 18:32Democrats must stop this.
-
18:32 - 18:35We must give the average people out there
-
18:35 - 18:37especially those who would never want to hear
-
18:37 - 18:39anything from me, or people like me,
-
18:39 - 18:41we must give them hope
-
18:41 - 18:44that Europe can rise up to the occasion
-
18:44 - 18:46of reclaiming constitutional democratic
-
18:46 - 18:49processes in a way that is consistent
-
18:49 - 18:54with their anxieties and aspirations
-
18:59 - 19:04Q: I still wonder why we need your movement, this new movement? As we have other political leftwing parties who fight for democracy, who fight for more integration.
-
19:12 - 19:15A: I hope, you know, it would be a dream
-
19:15 - 19:18for me, not to have to do this.
-
19:18 - 19:21It would be great, if existing movements
-
19:21 - 19:22could have done the job!
-
19:22 - 19:23But I don't feel they can and
-
19:23 - 19:25I don't believe a left-wing movement can
-
19:25 - 19:27do it. Look, I'm a left-winger, I make no bones
-
19:29 - 19:32about that, I think that you all know this,
-
19:32 - 19:35but I have to be brutally honest:
-
19:35 - 19:38The Left suffered a major defeat in the
-
19:38 - 19:42late 1980's, early 1990's. We carry a
-
19:42 - 19:46major burden of guilt. For all the crimes
-
19:46 - 19:50that we carried out as leftists,
-
19:50 - 19:53Not as individuals - the collective
-
19:53 - 19:54guilt of the left.
-
19:54 - 19:57Over the 20th Century.
-
19:57 - 20:00The Left has not succeeded
-
20:00 - 20:04since 1991 and especially after 2008 the
-
20:04 - 20:06major, the great financial crisis
-
20:06 - 20:09which it was the impetus, the trigger
-
20:09 - 20:11of the crisis of the Euro, the crisis of
-
20:11 - 20:12the European Union, now.
-
20:12 - 20:16We've failed as The Left to break out
-
20:16 - 20:18of that past to break out of that very
-
20:18 - 20:22strict confines of a minority.
-
20:22 - 20:24We did this in Greece, briefly
-
20:24 - 20:28but this was not replicated in Germany,
-
20:28 - 20:31not replicated in France.
-
20:31 - 20:34The issues that we're facing however
-
20:34 - 20:36just like in the 1970's, are issues
-
20:36 - 20:38of that are existentialist for the
-
20:38 - 20:41survival of Europe and well beyond
-
20:41 - 20:42the limitations of The Left
-
20:42 - 20:45This why we're calling for a broad
-
20:45 - 20:47coalition of liberal, social, leftist,
-
20:47 - 20:50radical, green democrats,
-
20:50 - 20:52who agree on one simple idea
-
20:52 - 20:55that the "demos" must be centrally in
-
20:55 - 20:56"Democracy."
-
20:56 - 20:58And not be treated with contempt by
-
20:58 - 21:00bureaucrats that have usurped power
-
21:00 - 21:04without anyone even having noticed.
-
21:10 - 21:12Q: As the Refugee situation is always been mentioned
-
21:12 - 21:22as a threat. I wonder if it is possible, if you view it possible for your movement as a positive thing? as a common project for europe, as population growth rather than just a threat.
-
21:28 - 21:30A: If you read our manifest, it's very clear
-
21:30 - 21:33on this: One of the epithets we have
-
21:33 - 21:35attached to the Europe of our dreams
-
21:35 - 21:37and our aspirations, is an Open Europe.
-
21:37 - 21:40A Europe that understands
-
21:40 - 21:45that fences and borders reflect insecurity
-
21:46 - 21:48And spread insecurity in the name of
-
21:48 - 21:52security. Speaking as Yanis Varoufakis now, not as DiEM
-
21:52 - 21:54because DiEM has to be genuinely democratic
-
21:54 - 21:56and therefore we have to convene sessions
-
21:56 - 21:59of this, before we have a position about that.
-
21:59 - 22:01I will speak to you now, personally
-
22:01 - 22:04not as a representative of DiEM.
-
22:04 - 22:06Two points about refugees:
-
22:06 - 22:10Firstly from the ancient Greek tradition
-
22:10 - 22:13of philoxenia when somebody knocks on
-
22:13 - 22:15your door in the middle of the night,
-
22:15 - 22:17they're wet and they're hungry
-
22:17 - 22:20and they're blooded and scares,
-
22:20 - 22:22you don't do a cost-benefit-analysis
-
22:22 - 22:23to find out whether you should open the
-
22:23 - 22:23door.
-
22:23 - 22:25You just open it!
-
22:25 - 22:27And you worry about the percussions
-
22:27 - 22:29of what you have done, much later
-
22:29 - 22:33after that person is dry, fed, watered
-
22:33 - 22:35and not scared.
-
22:35 - 22:36Point number one.
-
22:36 - 22:38Point number two:
-
22:38 - 22:40Europe must come to terms with its
-
22:40 - 22:43history. For hundreds of years we have
-
22:43 - 22:45populated the Earth.
-
22:45 - 22:48We've exported Europeans to The Americas
-
22:48 - 22:51to Australia, to Asia, to Africa.
-
22:51 - 22:55We've colonized. We've killed off tribes
-
22:55 - 22:57and have taken over the world.
-
22:58 - 23:01That was fine, it was part of the great European exodus.
-
23:01 - 23:03Well, you know what? Guess what!
-
23:03 - 23:06The demographics of the planet are now
-
23:06 - 23:08changing and Europe is going to be
-
23:08 - 23:10repopulated to a very large extent
-
23:10 - 23:11by people from outside of Europe.
-
23:11 - 23:13We better accept that.
-
23:13 - 23:15Learn to live with it
-
23:15 - 23:17and learn to draw from it
-
23:17 - 23:19all the energy that we can.
-
23:19 - 23:24We are Aging Europe
-
23:24 - 23:27and concentrate on how to handle this.
-
23:27 - 23:30What polices are needed in order to make
-
23:30 - 23:34this dynamic transition.
-
23:34 - 23:36Come much closer to humanist values
-
23:36 - 23:41and European values.
-
23:54 - 23:59Q: While reading your manifesto I saw some short-term goals like transparency and openness
-
24:05 - 24:09and some midle-term goals like constitutional assembling directly
-
24:10 - 24:14from the people of Europe
-
24:14 - 24:17Would you please adress the means you have in order of leverage to achieve those
-
24:17 - 24:18goals, in a european context?
-
24:19 - 24:21A: We have no means whatsoever.
-
24:21 - 24:23We're starting tonight
-
24:23 - 24:25Before tonight, we don't exist.
-
24:25 - 24:27They're who have no leverage.
-
24:27 - 24:31This is the whole point about a movement,
-
24:31 - 24:34you state principals, you state objectives
-
24:34 - 24:36you call upon fellow citizens from all
-
24:36 - 24:39over Europe to join in, if they think
-
24:39 - 24:44that there is a lacuna, ther is a dearth, that
-
24:44 - 24:45there is a lack and that they feel that
-
24:45 - 24:50they need to come with you and promote
-
24:51 - 24:54collectively those objectives
-
24:54 - 24:56So, our leverage will be absolutely
-
24:56 - 24:59proportional to the number of people
-
24:59 - 25:02that join DiEM and take an active part
-
25:02 - 25:05in the pursuit of our common objectives
-
25:05 - 25:10That's democracy.
-
25:12 - 25:16Q: Again from Lesbos. Now you find a very militarization in Lesbos..
-
25:30 - 25:34What is your answer to find a way out of this situation,
because you don't find Europe, nor institutions only volunteers are working. -
25:44 - 25:48I want to hear from you more concrete, what you can send appeal here in the evening, to go another way, not militarization, to find a political way to solve the problem, Its really time to act now.
-
25:59 - 26:01A: Precisely! This failure that you just
-
26:01 - 26:05described is a fundamental reason why
-
26:05 - 26:07we believe: We need a new movement
-
26:07 - 26:10in Europe, that offers Europeans an
-
26:10 - 26:11opportunities to discuss this as Europeans
-
26:11 - 26:15not as Greeks or as Germans or as Slovaks.
-
26:15 - 26:18But allow me, this is not the time to
-
26:18 - 26:21articulate the fully fledged policy
-
26:21 - 26:22response, but allow me to make a
-
26:22 - 26:25very simple point: Last summer
-
26:25 - 26:26our gouvernment in Greece - since you
-
26:26 - 26:28talked about Lesbos -
-
26:29 - 26:33was forced to capitulate to a deal
-
26:33 - 26:37that lends our bankrupt gouvernment
-
26:37 - 26:40another 85 billion. Before that
-
26:40 - 26:41we were forced as a nation to accept
-
26:41 - 26:43against the protestations of many of us
-
26:43 - 26:47on the streets, 130 billion in 2012.
-
26:47 - 26:49In 2010 we were forced to accept another
-
26:49 - 26:53110 billion, all supposedly as part of a
-
26:53 - 26:55solidarity to Greece - solidarity for
-
26:55 - 26:58the bankers - but anyway
-
26:58 - 27:01If all those tens and hundreds of billions
-
27:01 - 27:03can be forced down the throat of a nation
-
27:03 - 27:07that simply can't afford it, surely
-
27:07 - 27:09we could find one or two, by which
-
27:09 - 27:12to make this humanitarian part of the
-
27:12 - 27:16crisis go away - in the most humane way,
-
27:16 - 27:19in a way that does not constitute a
-
27:19 - 27:22stepping stone towards militarization.
-
27:22 - 27:24The fact that we are squabbling
-
27:24 - 27:26over the few hundreds of thousands of
-
27:26 - 27:29euros, when at the very same time
-
27:29 - 27:31bailouts of hundreds of billions
-
27:31 - 27:34of toxic loans are being banded about
-
27:34 - 27:37with abandon, this is another sign of
-
27:37 - 27:40the disintegration of the European Union
-
27:40 - 27:42History is going to pass very harsh
-
27:42 - 27:46judgement on us
-
27:49 - 27:53Q: You always talk about more democratic practic? Are we more democratic e.g. Communist
-
27:54 - 27:59Party of Greece called Greece to leave European Union
-
28:01 - 28:04A: Let me put it very sincerely:
-
28:04 - 28:06Maybe we should not have created the
-
28:06 - 28:07European Union the way we did.
-
28:07 - 28:09I'm convinced we shouldn't
-
28:09 - 28:11we should have either not create it or
-
28:11 - 28:15very differently, but once we've created
-
28:15 - 28:17it, the disintegration of the European
-
28:17 - 28:21Union is going to bring about
-
28:21 - 28:26a very rapid collapse that will resemble
-
28:26 - 28:28in terrible ways, what happened in the
-
28:28 - 28:321930's and what I respond to my friends
-
28:32 - 28:35in the Communist Party, radical parts of
-
28:35 - 28:37the left, who are articulating the
-
28:37 - 28:39position, that maybe disintegration,
-
28:39 - 28:41going back to a national currency, to
-
28:41 - 28:43an nation state and so on, is that
-
28:43 - 28:45the solution, is I remind them
-
28:45 - 28:48that, when we had such disintegration in
-
28:48 - 28:491930's, it was not humanism
-
28:49 - 28:51and it was not the left, that benefited
-
28:51 - 28:55It was the fascists, and it was the Nazis
-
28:55 - 28:59and Europe fell into a terrible trap
-
29:00 - 29:03with immense human costs
-
29:03 - 29:04Do we want the same?
-
29:04 - 29:07I certainly don't.
-
29:07 - 29:12We have time for one last question.
-
29:16 - 29:20Those who are accredited we invite to ask
-
29:20 - 29:26later. We also organized live-stream.
-
29:37 - 29:43Q: How wil you engage people from small countries in DiEM?
-
29:50 - 29:53A: We are great believers in acting locally,
-
29:53 - 29:55in the context of an over-arching
-
29:55 - 29:58pan-European agenda. So, there will be
-
29:58 - 30:01many different layers of participation
-
30:01 - 30:03There will be an application, an app
-
30:03 - 30:06on the peoples' phone; there will be a
-
30:06 - 30:08website, so the digital platform, which
-
30:08 - 30:10is these days essentially in anything
-
30:10 - 30:12one does at the collective or even at the
-
30:12 - 30:17individual level, those are digital
-
30:17 - 30:20platforms will allow people in Slovenia
-
30:20 - 30:23in Ljubljana, to find out who is around
-
30:23 - 30:27them, that is engaged. Our idea is to move
-
30:27 - 30:30very quickly from these forms of digital
-
30:30 - 30:34communication to town-hall events
-
30:34 - 30:38in towns, in villages, in cities.
-
30:38 - 30:40On themes, that we decide collectively
-
30:40 - 30:43throughout Europe. Leading to bigger
-
30:43 - 30:46events like the one we're having today
-
30:46 - 30:47On a rolling basis
-
30:47 - 30:50so, that the digital communication can
-
30:50 - 30:52become analog and take the form of
-
30:52 - 30:56face-to-face meetings, at the level of
-
30:56 - 31:00the local, the state, and the pan-European
-
31:01 - 31:03Thanks a lot. Maybe Yanis, you want a
-
31:03 - 31:04final message or..
-
31:04 - 31:06Well, the final message is, that
-
31:06 - 31:08there's absolutely no doubt
-
31:08 - 31:11that, what we are doing with DiEM
-
31:11 - 31:14seems quite Utopian.
-
31:14 - 31:17The idea of starting a European movement
-
31:17 - 31:20not from a particular country
-
31:20 - 31:23not from any existing organizational
-
31:23 - 31:26basis, but from a horizontal perspective
-
31:26 - 31:29throughout Europe, in order to change Europe
-
31:29 - 31:32and to stop the descent into this hole
-
31:32 - 31:37that disintegration is opening up for us
-
31:37 - 31:40It sounds pretty far fetched, and it may
-
31:40 - 31:42very well fail, but what is the
-
31:42 - 31:45alternative? The alternative is either
-
31:45 - 31:48to keep pretending, as the powers that be
-
31:48 - 31:51in the European Union are doing
-
31:51 - 31:52that they can maintain this European
-
31:52 - 31:53Union, that we now have.
-
31:53 - 31:56They can't - that's far more Utopian than
-
31:56 - 31:59what we are doing!
-
31:59 - 32:02And finally: The alternative to this
-
32:02 - 32:06Utopian project is a horrible dystopia
-
32:06 - 32:11that is going to punish severely everyone
-
32:11 - 32:16except those, who flourish and find ways
-
32:16 - 32:20of profiting it - Profiting from human
-
32:20 - 32:21disasters.
-
32:21 - 32:26Thank you very much!
Show all