J.K. Rowling’s Spiral into Madness (with ContraPoints)

From “sex is real” to Holocaust denial — if it happened to the wizard lady, it can happen to you.

Support me on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/mattbernstein

Watch more from Natalie Wynn a.k.a. ContraPoints: https://www.youtube.com/@ContraPoints

Find more of A Bit Fruity: https://www.instagram.com/abitfruitypod/?hl=en
Find more of Matt: https://www.instagram.com/mattxiv/?hl=en

Hello, hello, and welcome back to A Bit

Fruity, the show where we think that you

should never live in the closet, Harry,

even if the woman who created you changes
her mind.

If you would like to support the show

or perhaps want a little bit more of the
show,

we are on Patreon and by the time

this episode is up, it'll be around the

same time that I upload March's deep dive

on Patreon, which I do every month

and this month it is on the wokeness of

Sydney Sweeney. The right just figured

out who Sydney Sweeney is because

they saw her on SNL and they never watched

Euphoria and her being hot is

causing a freakout of epic proportions.

So we're going to do a little analysis

of a woman's body, which is something

that I'm fairly new to.

So, you know, wish me luck.

Today, we are joined, once again,

by someone who I'm honored to call a

friend of the show, Natalie Wynn—or as you

may know her online, ContraPoints—is an

ex-philosopher, she is a YouTuber,

but I think calling her a YouTuber

is kind of diminutive to her craft.

She puts out a couple feature film-length

videos a year that you've probably

watched, but if you haven't, you really

should go check those out.

She talks about philosophy, and sex and

gender, and capitalism, and Twilight

[Matt] Natalie Wynn welcome back to A Bit
Fruity.

Thank you much for having me back on,

I am excited to be here again.

I'm honored to be a friend of the show.

I'm honored to have you as a friend

of the show. So, a couple weeks ago,

J.K. Rowling, she got caught up in a

little Holocaust denial.

She does a little Holocaust denial.
- [Matt] (laughs)

From time to time, (laughter) yeah.

It wasn't always this way. J.K. Rowling

wasn't always on Twitter denying

that queer people were persecuted in

the Holocaust. Until 2019, J.K. Rowling

was a universally beloved children's

author who taught every kid that there

was magic inside of them, no matter how

cast out they may feel. Today, though,

how would you characterize her position

in the culture today?

Well, her position in the culture is

kind of weirdly split, right? 'Cause on

the one hand, there is her continuing

legacy as the author of the wizard books

and on the other hand, there's

almost her entire public persona, that

we mostly experience through Twitter,

which is basically obsessive bigotry

towards trans people. That's become

sort of her definitive thing, right?

I think that people who don't follow this

kind of don't understand the extent of it

because, you know, I don't know, people

throw around all kinds of accusations

on Twitter, so it's easy to think that

this is some kind of internet drama

blown out of proportion. But what you're

missing is that if you have not been

paying attention to J.K. Rowling's Twitter

for the last, at this point, we're

talking about four or five years, which

is a long time. Like, she's basically used

her platform, more often than not, to do

trans-bashing. There's a reason why

this gets talked about so much because,

I mean, she's one of the most famous

authors in the world with an enormous

platform, and she's just using it

constantly to target this small and

already besieged minority of people

who are facing all kinds of

legislative and cultural backlash in

the U.S. and the U.K. So it's really

devastating (chuckle) that an author

that's this influential is also

this obsessively devoted to

persecu—you know, to contributing

to the persecution of this group of

people, who's already so harassed.

But it's also, I don't know, it's also

kind of a bizarre spectacle? In its own

right, it's kind of another reason

I feel like we're drawn to this, maybe,

is that it's kind of darkly fascinating.

How does this happen?
- [Matt] Mm.

Like, how do we go from the

Gryffindor common room and, you know,

Severus Snape to these unhinged

rants about the transsexuals. It's weird.

It is weird and I think also, I mean,

yeah, if you go to J.K. Rowling's Twitter

right now and scroll through her feed,

it is literal years of talking every

single day, almost exclusively, about

transgender people. For years.

Which I think is the type of behavior

we associate with boomer Facebook

moms, and then I guess, in a sense, she

kind of would have been that, if she

hadn't become a billionaire and one of

the most famous and beloved children's

authors of all time. But she is those

things and the idea of her behaving the

way that our homophobic aunt does

or whatever, but from some castle

in the U.K., is just a very jarring
image.

[Natalie] I think that summarizes it
really well, right?

It is like your bigoted aunt's deranged

Facebook post, except on a platform with

millions of people as the audience. I feel

like we as a society have yet to know how

to deal with this type of thing 'cause

J.K. Rowling's not the only case of it.

I mean, Elon Musk has dabbled

a little bit in some similar forms of

bigotry with a comparable or even

larger platform. But I feel like what's

unique about J.K. Rowling is that

she's single-mindedly focused on

trans people as this one issue.

So she wasn't always this way though,

and what we're gonna do today

is use J.K. Rowling as what I think is

a valuable case study in the worm hole

that transphobia is. The way that it

can serve, as it has for J.K. Rowling

and so many millions of other people,

as a portal into the broader world

of right-wing ideology that gets pretty

scary pretty quickly. We're gonna

try to understand why transphobia, and

I think especially when it's cloaked,
(chuckles)

no pun intended, as a progressive

feminist cause, is an especially effective

gateway into the alt right. One day,

you're reminding people that you

just like to be referred to as a woman

and that you are a woman, and then,

you know, the next day you are

participating in Holocaust denial. It can
happen to you.

[Natalie] (chuckles) Many such cases.

[Matt] Many such cases. And so, to begin

this story, I wanna go back to 2019

to the first tweet that I remember

seeing of J.K. Rowling's, her foray into

the anti-trans movement, which at the

beginning, was very tepid. I am going to

send you the tweet.

[Natalie] "Dress however you please.

Call yourself whatever you like.

Sleep with any consenting adult who'll

have you. Live your best life in peace

and security. But force women out of their

jobs for stating that sex is real?

Hashtag I stand with Maya. Hashtag this is
not a drill".

So what was the context of this one?

[Natalie] So, the context is that there

was a English consultant named

Maya Forstater who, I guess she wasn't

fired but her contract was not

renewed because she had refused

to use the correct pronouns for a trans

coworker or something along those lines.

And a lot of so called "gender-critical"—

that is, "transphobic"—people in the U.K.

decided to turn this into a celebrated

cause. They, you know, rallied behind

this hashtag, "I stand with Maya".

The idea being, like, "Oh, we shouldn't

have to submit to gender ideology by,

you know, using the correct pronouns

for trans people in the work place or

whatever. This is where J.K. Rowling

decided to join this discourse

officially. She decided to jump in on

the side of people who think that it's

terribly oppressive to have to use

the correct pronouns for a trans person.

And I guess at first, you know, there was

some ambiguity because you could be

like, "Well, she's not transphobic. Maybe

she just believes in free speech and she

thinks that, you know, that people

shouldn't be fired for having different

opinions." And okay, at first,

you could sort of plausibly think

that maybe, given the benefit of the

doubt, that's why she was getting

involved in this. But to people who

kind of know the pattern that

transphobia takes, we all pretty

much knew that "Oh, okay, she's really

transphobic behind the scenes".

Like, there's no way that you would

decide to die on this hill, unless
- Matt: Mm.

you already were. At least, that's what I

think now. I mean, I think J.K. Rowling

was at her most dangerous in 2019 and

in 2020 because the stuff she was

saying seems kind of plausible and

reasonable to the average person, you

know. And so, there's this kinda

clever selection of which topics to

get behind, right? Instead of just,

I don't know, calling trans women "men

in dresses" or whatever, it's like she's

defending the "right" of people to not

use the correct pronouns if they don't

agree, right? These people

kind of hedge in this way, when

they have a kind of like bigoted opinion.

Instead of just stating it outright,

they sort of defend their right to have

that opinion.
- Matt: Mhmm.

[Natalie] So that was very much what this
thing with Maya Forstater is, right?

It's like she's not saying something

sort of directly transphobic, but she's

kind of indirectly getting there by being

like, "I am going to publicly champion

Maya's right to be transphobic. "

I feel like, in the early days,

she did so much of this plausible

deniability stuff where it's like, you

know, "I'm just saying sex is real".

And right? And the average person who

isn't a terminally online queer

is gonna be like, "Yeah, sex is real,

whatever, like, who cares?"

You know? It's not a big deal.

Yeah, she was very effective

early on at kind of deciding what

it was that she thought people

were mad about, right? And so, she

framed the conversation like, "Oh, here's

why I'm getting backlash. I'm getting

backlash because I said, "sex is real".

And so, it kind of seems

like if you believe her account of what

people are mad about, then it sounds like

everyone who's mad is unreasonable

because they're mad at her taking

this kind of—

Taking what? An abstract, philosophical

position about the metaphysics of

biological sex? Is that what people

are mad about? No, right? Of course, it's

not that. It's because she is intervening

in this social and political debate,

right? On the side that wants trans people

functionally not to exist in public

life or not to be acknowledged in

public life. So, that's what people

are mad about, right? But early on,

I think she was able to kind of

frame her position as being this,

I don't know, almost philosophical

position about the reality of sex or

something, you know? That's what she

wanted to make it sound like, instead of

a political position about the place of

transgender people in society.

When you first saw that tweet, were alarm
bells ringing?

Oh, absolutely. I mean, at that point,

I was like, yeah, I basically internally

thought there was like a nine

hundred and ninety-nine out of

one thousand percent chance that

it's, as people say, over, right?

(laughing) Right.

[Natalie] It's so over, right? I basically

already kind of knew that.

But I also kind of knew that,

well, most people aren't gonna notice

that it's over until she says something
more explicit.

Until she's doing Holocaust denial.

[Natalie] Yeah, until she's doing
Holocaust denial, exactly.

But, of course, I've seen enough

people who kind of start this way

with this flirtation with bigotry, where

stage one is usually like, "Well, I

support the right for people to be bigots.

I don't like that there's this

cancel culture, whatever, politically

correct, you can't say anything anymore."

That's usually the prelude to a

bunch of bigoted stuff. It's kind of

like a softer way of getting a foot

in the door. Like, you're not necessarily

committing yourself to saying anything

bigoted. But you'll stand up for the right

of people to say that and you don't

like how, you know, how vicious people

are being towards people who are getting

criticized for saying more bigoted things.

In retrospect, it's clear that she's

preparing the way to be the one saying

those bigoted things herself.

For a while longer, well into 2020,

she continues this road of

like, "sex is real". And so, I'm going to
- Natalie: Yeah.

send you another thread.

It's funny how I know all of these,

like, by heart practically. (laughs)
-Matt: Oh. (laughs)

-It's like song lyrics. (laughing)
-Natalie: Right? I'm like a scholar

-of the things she has said about
-Matt: (laughing)

trans people, right? Like, "Ah yes,

tweet seven, verse three".

[Matt] (wheezes)

I know, 'cause we've read these

-f***ing tweets so many times.
-Natalie: I know. I know,

the last four years has been

dominated by having to read these

terrible opinions again and again.

This is, honestly, no one should be

allowed to get this famous. It's too
dangerous.

(laughs)

Okay, but for the normal people listening

who aren't so online, do you want to read

what she tweeted on June 6th, I believe,
2020?

Dear normal people, this is me reading

from the Book of Rowling, Chapter Six.

(laughs)
-Natalie: Quote:

[Natalie] "If sex isn't real, there's no
same-sex attraction. If sex isn't real,

the lived reality of women globally

is erased. I know and love trans people,

but erasing the concept of sex removes

the ability of many to meaningfully

discuss their lives. It isn't hate to

speak the truth."

Tweet two: "The idea that women like me,

who've been empathetic to trans people

for decades, feeling kinship because

they're vulnerable in the same way

as women—that is, to male violence—'hate'

trans people because they think sex is

real and has lived consequences—

(English accent) it is a nonsense."

- (laughs)
-Natalie: Sorry, I feel like I cannot say,

"is a nonsense" without doing it in an

English accent.
-Matt: (laughs)

[Natalie] I'm gonna switch to doing an
English accent for the last

one because I just feel like—

[Natalie] (English accent) "I respect
every trans person's right to live any way

that feels authentic and comfortable to

them. I'd march with you IF you were

discriminated against on the basis

of being trans. At the same time, my

life has been shaped by being female.

I do not believe it is hateful to say so."

"I'd march with you if you were

being discriminated against."

Yeah, that's a big, big red flag, right?

And this was the same month that, again,

the U.S., Donald Trump had announced an

intention to ban trans healthcare.

Yes.

The notion that discrimination

against trans people is this

hypothetical thing that might occur in

the future, right? (laughs)

If ever there was a trans person who

faced bigotry on the basis of their

identity, I would stand up for them. But

that hasn't happened yet, so I'm just not.

I'm not standing up.

Yeah. Right. "No one's ever been

discriminated against for being trans. But

if it does happen, I'll march with you."

But, okay, first of all, by the way, these

tweets got hundreds of thousands of likes

and people were like, "Yes! You're a
- Natalie: Yes.

warrior!" But again, a normal person who

isn't super online, and, I mean, you know,

from the queer and pro-trans end, but also

from the super TERF-y, anti-trans end,

if you aren't a part of either of those

groups, you're reading this and you're

like, "What the f*** is she talking about?

What is this "sex is real" thing? What is

she talking about?
-Natalie: Yeah.

It's a weird argument, right? Because

it seems on the surface like it's a

linguistic point that she's trying to

make, right? There's this idea that she

says, quote, "If we get rid of the

concept of sex, that removes the

ability of many to discuss their lives."

Okay, this is what I think the assumption

is: If we acknowledge that trans people

are who they say they are,

then that means that none of

the rest of us can talk about how gender

has impacted our lives, right? In other

words, if a trans woman is a woman, then

I guess, you know, "I, J.K,. Rowling, can

never talk about the way that I have

been discriminated against for being

a woman." I mean, it's a little bit of an

oppression olympics almost kind of

argument, where there can only be one
- Matt: Mm.

oppressed group, right? And if we talk

about how, you know, there's no way to

include trans people as a valid concept

without sort of, somehow, deleting or

erasing the entire concept of women,

which, I mean, it doesn't make any sense,

right? In fact, J.K. Rowling will later

use as an example. Okay, what does it mean

to "erase women"? I mean, well, okay, so

she'll use the example of some

hospital somewhere, on a piece of

paperwork uses the term "pregnant

person" instead of "pregnant woman".

Why? Because there is transgender men who

can and have gotten pregnant. And so,

saying "pregnant people" is a more,

even if you find that to be an awkward

phrase, it's still a more inclusive

phrase that is going to help trans men

who need reproductive healthcare

that, you know, conventionally would be

"women's health", right? I just don't

understand why making it inclusive to

transgender men somehow deletes

the concept of women from existence.

Like, what? I—It just doesn't make

any sense to me. I feel like it's a weird

pretext for being prejudicial.

-Well, and it's just such a lie. I mean,
-Natalie: Yeah.

you see this a lot with TERFs, trans

exclusionary radical feminists. It's like

the arm of quote unquote, "feminism"

that is basically just defined by

transphobia, especially towards trans
women.

Yeah, I don't even know if I would say
that it's especially towards trans women.

I would say that they're especially
vitriolic towards trans women

and they kind of vilify. Trans women are
- Matt: Mm.

sort of cast as dangerous predators.

But trans men, I feel like, the way that a

lot of, including J.K. Rowling, talk about

trans men is quite reprehensible, I think
too.

- Like, usually the idea is trans men are
- Matt: Mm.

confused girls who've been tricked by the

medical establishment, the evil

cabal of endocrinologists who have,

somehow, hoodwinked vulnerable girls

into thinking that they're men. Which, of

course, is not how the healthcare system

works at all. You really have to

scream and cry to get hormones.

No one is persuading you to do this. In

fact, quite the opposite. Everyone is

telling you not to. So, the idea that

trans men or that any kind of assigned

female at birth trans person is this sort

of confused, vulnerable baby child.

It's not vilification to the extent that

they've vilified trans women as dangerous

predators, but it's infantilizing in a

way that I think can be just as harmful

in its consequences, right? When someone

says, "Oh, you can't make decisions about

your own body because you're too confused

and childish." Like, you know, that has
-Matt: Yeah.

devastating consequences which we see.

And any feminist should be aware of how

this works 'cause this is what they say
about abortion; it's what they say about

contraceptions; it's what they say about
women's health in general.

"Shut up, little girl, you can't make

decisions about your body. We'll do it

for you." And that's exactly the same

thing J.K. Rowling is essentially saying
to trans men.

TERFs, especially towards trans men,

do this like, "We're losing our lesbians.

They're all becoming trans men" thing.

Which, that as a refrain, I just don't

understand at all because,

statistically, when you look at the number

of gen Z people who are coming out as

queer, under every single one of the

letters, it's higher in all of them.
-Natalie: Yeah.

[Natalie] Right.

Like, there are more out lesbians today

than there have ever been.

(stammers) Yes, there's never been more

-lesbians, like, yeah
- Matt: Theres- (laughs) And to be clear

I love that (laughs)

Yeah it's good, it's good actually, yeah.

No, I mean, I feel like it comes from,

it's like a very, like, selfish, like,

childish perspective. It's almost like,

"No don't transition, you're so sexy aha,"

- you know? Like, I feel like, thats kind
- Matt: Yeah (laughs)

of, like, (stammers) and some gay women

do say this about trans men. Like,

"No, all the butch women are

transitioning, like, I wanted to f***

them before, no!" And it's like, okay,

well, too bad, like (scoffs) other people

don't have to live their lives in

accordance with what you find sexually

attractive. Like, again, as a woman

(stammers) you should know this, right?

- you should know that what you're
- Matt: Yeah

doing, what you're speaking about someone

as if your sexual attraction to them

entitles you to their living a certain

way. You should know why that's bad and

why that feels violating and why that robs

someone of autonomy, right?

And with TERFs and this whole thing of,

like, "they're erasing the linguistic

concept of a woman." It's like (sighs)

- what world do you have to live in
- (Natalie) Yeah.

for that to feel like the truth? And

look, I'm not a woman. And so, sometimes

with these conversations I'm very careful

about, like, even J.K. Rowling, a woman

who I disagree with entirely on so many

of these issues, it's like, I don't wanna

police her understanding of her own trauma

- as it pretence to being a woman.
- (Natalie) Yeah.

However, I still, like, we all live in

the same society, and it's like, I'm

just very hard pressed to think that the

word "woman" is going anywhere.

(Natalie scoffs)

It's like, I don't think that, because on

some, like, in some medical papers that

are being published, that they're using

the terms "people who get pregnant,"

"people have periods," I don't think

that means that, like, they're gonna start

calling you in casual conversation

"a person who menstruates."

No. And no one talks like that way.

I've never heard of a trans person

casually refer to cis woman as

"people who menstruate." Because the

entire point of that term is that it

doesn't just refer to cis women.

There are people who have a sort of

visceral reaction to it, which I

guess I can kind of understand. Like,

I think if you were to make, like, an

intelligible, like, understandable

argument out of what J.K. Rowling seems

to be saying in these tweets, I mean I

think you could put it like this,

"For most women, the way that they are

oppressed in society is in fact

intertwined with biology," right? With

women's reproductive role, as most women

are capable of getting pregnant. And

that becomes a area where women's lives

are policed, right? It's interesting how

J.K. Rowling never talks about this,

- right? Not a word, not a word
- Matt: Mhmm

about Roe v Wade being overturned

in the United States. For most women,

biology and misogyny, they certainly are

- intertwined. And there's a case to be
- Matt: Yeah.

made that anyone who's assigned

female at birth does sort of belong

to a oppressed class by virtue of

their reproductive capability. Especially,

like, you know, the sensitivity around,

like, you know, "saying people who

menstruate" or "people who give birth."

I feel like if you hear those phrases in

isolation, they kind of, like, can be

abrasive sounding because there's,

like, a lot of shame and stigma, there

have for thousands of years around

menstruation and, you know, women

often are kind of reduced by patriarchy

to, like, birthing people in a sense,

right? So, I feel like that there's, like,

some grain of something I can sympathize

with her in terms of having a visceral,

negative reaction to these phrases.

But I feel like anyone who takes a second

to cool down, understand the context

of the phrase, will see
that's, like, clearly

not the intention. They know that it's

going to have an emotional effect for a

- lot of women to see those phrases.
- Matt: Mhmm

And so, they kind of decontextualize it

and blast it onto Twitter with, like,

a kind of vague implication that,

"Oh, this is what they are going to

reduce you to," and, like, "they" is who?

"They" is quote on quote trans ideology.

Which is sort of vaguely implied to be

this, like, powerful cabal.

(laughs) Right, which is also incredible

because in real life it's like people

with a hundred followers on Twitter.

Yes, right! It's like you're being yelled

at by, like, random, like, furries.

(laughing)

J.K. Rowling, she does fixate heavily on

her own perceived persecution by trans

people on Twitter. J.K. Rowling often

gets into these, like, feuds, like very

public feuds that she- actually I wanna

google how many followers she has on

Twitter. J.K. Rowling... Do you know

the number by heart?

I mean, I think it used to be like

fourteen million.

Oh! It's fourteen million.

I hate that I know this.

(laughter) Me too.

I don't want these stocks in my head.

J.K. Rowling, to her fourteen million

followers, she, like, regularly puts these

random a**, people on blast, and it's

like, I don't know, I have, what? I have

four hundred thousand Twitter followers,

which is, by the way, too many for a
twink.

But, none the less, it's like, lots

of horrible people say horrible things

to me on the internet. You have to

be aware of the power dynamic of, like,

when you have fourteen million followers.

[Natalie]
I feel like it was missing from J.K.

Rowling's discussion of how she's, like,

victimized by social media, is any

understanding of power, and I think

that a key thing that is going on with

J.K. Rowling is that she doesn't

conceptualize herself as a powerful

person. I mean, and this is common,

right? Cause, you know, most people

kind of think of themselves as, like,

heroic underdogs, I feel, because, I

don't know, you got bullied as a child,

you got, you know, (stutters) right,

like, in J.K. Rowling's case, like, she

used to live in relative poverty. She was

a single mom, she fled a, you know, a

abusive relationship. And so, I still

think in a way she kind of thinks of

herself as this, like, small, like, scared

person, like, on the run.

Mmmm

I mean, she's had, like, twenty-five years

to, like, catch up to the new reality,

but I feel like internally she still

hasn't, right? I think it's hard for a

lot of people to make this switch where

you realize, "Oh, I am the big fish now,"

right? Like, "I am the one who has power."

And I think that, I mean a lot of what

privilege is is a kind of blindness

to your own power. She hasn't noticed that

she's extremely powerful and influential.

So, it hasn't occurred to her that, like,

I don't know, going after some random

YouTuber with a hundred, you know,

hundred thousands of subscribers, is,

like, weird behavior for a celebrity of

her size.

And not even a YouTuber with a hundred

thousand subscribers, random a** people.

I was just scrolling through her Twitter

the other day getting ready for this

episode, and, like, she was sending

multiple tweets, like, screenshotting

this man's tweets and then sending out

her responses to her fourteen million

followers. This guy named Rajan, who

wrote, "I am a CIS male and an ally

of the LGBTQ community. All of my life

I have fought for diversity and equality.

I advised two Attorney General's on

race and equality issues and prosecuted

on behalf of victims of crime. I know

who I am and am proud of what I stand

for." And she responded with, uh, with

her own tweet, which she was pretending

to speak in his voice, in Rajan's voice.

She wrote, "I am a man who wants to see

girls and women stripped of their rights

and protections for the benefit of

my fellow men." And it's like, okay,

obviously that's not what Rajan was

saying. But then I was like, "Who the hell

is Rajan?" He has four hundred and

fifty-three followers. The tweet which she

sent out to her fourteen million

followers, Rajan's original tweet

had twenty-five likes!

Yeah, it's, like, literally just some guy

and she's just, (stutters) like, there's

no sense of the influence she wields.

I mean, in a way, she does think that

she's just someone's, like, Facebook

aunt. She's behaving in a way that is

indistinguishable from the way- she's not

acting like a public figure.

I just can't understand how J.K. Rowling

has spent, and this is what she does

everyday by the way, listener, feel

free to go to her Twitter. She's beefing

with someone who lives in, like, f******

Iowa. And it's like, I just can't (laughs)

conceptualize, especially if I had a

billion dollars. I don't know. I would

be on, like, a yacht probably. And not

arguing with f****** Rajan four hundred,

fifty-three followers. Rajan, if you're

out there, shout out. You seem like a

great guy.

(laughter)

Yeah, we love Rajan on this podcast.

I just can't make sense of her spending,

I imagine her rocking back n' forth in

the corner of, like, her eleventh living

room in her sixth castle; just, like, on

Twitter sweating.

(scoffs) I think we like to imagine

that when people get, you know, really

rich and famous, then there's a sense of,

like, peace or happiness or tranquility

that accompanies that, but that does not

seem to be the case, right? I mean, I'm

trying to imagine being in that situation.

I feel that, like, once you achieved a

certain level of, like, you know, success

beyond most people's wildest dreams...

It must be hard to know what to do with

that feeling of discontentment that's,

- like, still inside of you.
- (Matt) Mmm

And I think that sometimes people, like,

you know, wildly successful people, like

J.K. Rowling or Elon Musk, they sort of

get addicted to Twitter as this, like,

- source of conflict (scoffs) almost.
- (Matt) Mmm

It's almost like (stutters) once you don't

have to worry about money, once, you know,

you're free of your, you know, your past

abusive relationship, once you've, you

know, accomplish all the things you

previously wanted to accomplish, it's,

like, it's almost like you need to- you

just can't be happy with that. You need

to, like, find a new, like, fight almost.

And so, people go looking on Twitter;

you can always find a fight on Twitter.

I think there's something very unhealthy

about the way a lot of people, uh, relate

to using the internet as a source of

conflict, and then once your ego gets

invested, I think that's, you know, part

of what's going on with J.K. Rowling, of

course, is that because she's come,

you know, she's, like, positioned herself

so firmly on the anti-trans side. She now

feels like she has to defend it viciously.

Because otherwise, that would mean

admitting that she was wrong and admitting

that she's caused a massive amount of

damage.

Yes and you know what? It is really hard

to, like, profess your beliefs in front of

a lot of people. Like I have basically

done that as part of my job of making,

like, social and political content and

commentary online for the lat few years.

Like one of the things that took me

too long to come to grips with is that,

like, sometimes you need to know when

you're wrong. And, like, taking the L as

- the kids say, and I've had to
- (Natalie) Yeah.

take L's online and it's embarrassing

and it makes you feel small. I mean,

Natalie, I know that's happened to you

where you've had to come to the mic and

be like, "Yeah I was wrong about this

thing," even if it takes a while to do

that. That is also one of the greatest,

like, personal lessons that I've taken

away from, like, being online

politically; is that being wrong is

actually, like, I mean it's so f******

corny, but it's like an opportunity.

I think it's, like, genuinely, like,

spiritually good for you to be able to

accept that. It's been helpful to me

overtime to learn, to get a lot of

criticism, and to kind of be at peace

with it, and to not feel like I need to

constantly be, like, a vigilant defender

of my own ego. People are going to say

things about me, they're going to

misrepresent me, they're going to

criticize me, and some of it will be

true, and a lot of it will be false. And

like, you just kind of have to learn to

- find peace with that. Otherwise you'll
- (Matt) Mmm

go crazy. But, yeah, what we have on

our hands here with Ms. Rowling is a case

of someone who is pathologically

incapable of ever letting anything go

ever, right?
- Matt: (laughs) Ever.

Like, I don't think she's ever once

admitted to being wrong about a single

thing.

No, and that includes the Holocaust denial

arc, which I'm teasing the listener with

cause we're not quite there yet.

I wanna return to the role of language

in all of this and, like, semantics,

right? We're going to be talking about

the transphobia serving as a gateway

into further right wing, you know, broader

right wing ideology. But then I also think

that taking it back a step, I think that

some people's entry into transphobia are

these, like, frankly, like, silly semantic

- word arguments.
- (Natalie) Yeah.

They're erasing the word "women." And so,

as another example, what I think is a

powerful example of that: Ana Kasparian.

So, Ana Kasparian, she's one of the

political commentators on the Young Turks,

which is one of the bigger and of the

earlier left wing political YouTube shows.

You know she had her viral, um, "I don't

care what the Bible says! I don't, like...

(video) "I don't care if you're Christian.

In fact, I will fight for you to have

your religious liberty and practice

your Christianity. I believe in that. I

don't believe in Christianity, which means

that you do not get to dictate the way I

live my life based on your religion.

I don't care what the Bible says. You have

every right in the world. All those women

who identify with your religion have every

right in the world to not get an

abortion, to not take birth control.

But they do not have the right to dictate

my life and what I decide to do with

my body. I don't care about your godd*mn

religion."

(Matt) I think she's, like, had some

really great things to say over the years.

And none of that, none of the education,

none of anything stopped her from falling

into transphobic semantic rabbit hole

last May; like all horrible things that

took place on Twitter. So I'm going to

send you the tweets.

Okay so this first tweet is, "I'm a woman.

Please don't ever refer to me as a

person with a uterus, birthing person,

or person who menstruates. How do

people not realize how degrading this is?

You can support the transgender community

without doing this s***."

If you're just taking this tweet at face

value, I don't even disagree with it.

I think, like, yeah, right, don't, you

shouldn't refer to an individual person

as a "birthing person," that's weird. I

agree. I feel like where I disagree is in

the subtext, right? The first question

I have is, in what context did someone

refer to Anna in this way? Did this

happen? Did someone call her

(Natalie) "a person who menstruates"?

Like, in what context? Was the context

on a piece of medical paperwork? Should

phrases such as "a person who menstruates"

replace the phrase "woman" in everyday

English? No, of course not. Who's

suggesting that? Is anyone suggesting

that? I've never once heard trans person

suggest that. So, it's like, we're

arguing against this position that,

like, who are we arguing against?

I don't know. It feels like (stutters) for

some reason there's this need to argue

against this, like, strong man version of

a trans activist, who insist that we stop

using the word "women". I've never heard

someone claim that. I also think, like,

even the extent to which this is used

in medical context is overstated. Like, I

don't know, I'm thinking of, like, recent

times I've interacted with the medical

system. I feel like I'm often, you know,

when you select your gender on medical

paperwork, it's usually male, female,

or, like, other (scoffs) and it'll ask

you to explain. So, I will usually, like,

add, you know, as a context note that

I am a transgender woman. So that, in so

far as that's medically relevant, it's

noted. I have no given birth, nor have I

been to the hospital with someone giving

birth recently. So, I cannot say what the

experience is like. But I guess I'll be

curious to know, like, how often, I don't

know, if someone is listening this, um,

you know, if you, like, had a baby at a

hospital recently, like, how frequently

were phrases like "birthing person" used?

My guess is not very frequently.

- So I'm not sure (stammers) It just
- (Matt) Right.

feels like a sort of imaginary argument

that we're having.

(Matt) Totally, totally.

(stammers) I'm, like, lacking context for,

like, where is this occurring? I spend a

lot of time around women, actually. And

I feel like I don't see the word- I don't

see these phrases being thrown around

very often these days. And I'm in a very

trans inclusive, you know, kind of social

- environment. So, you'd think if
- Matt: (laughs)

lots of people had replaced the word

"woman" with "person with a uterus," I

think I would have heard that but I

haven't.

(laughs) Right? So, she's starting to get

kind of dogged online and she responds

with tweet number two. Please hold...

Did you receive?

Umm, hold on. Not yet.

Oh, wait. Did it not send to you?

- I don't see it.
- (Matt) Oh, weird.

Okay wait let me try again. Maybe I

just sent it to the wrong person (laughs)

And then out of nowhere you receive it

(laughter)

and its some tweet from a year ago

You might want to figure out who you

- just send that to. It could be kind of
- (Matt laughing)

weird with no context.

(laughing continues)

Okay tweet two, "LOL. The meltdowns over

wanting to be referred to as a woman

rather than a "birthing person" is pretty

wild. I'll never apologize for that,

especially as biological woman who

has had a f****** lifetime of being

told I'm less than. I'm a woman. No

apologies," (sighs) So, again it's like, I

don't know, a lot of this type of

transphobic stuff comes from a kind of,

like, misdirected frustration with

misogyny. Anna reacted with, "Oh, people

are sort of forcing me to be called

the 'birthing person', and then that's

sort of somehow erasing the lifetime of

misogyny that I've had to experience

as a woman." I mean, I think it's like a

kind of scapegoat in a way. I feel that,

like, a lot of times, like, people who

get (stutters) into this gender critical

talking points, it's often a kind of,

like, displaced rage and frustration at

experiences of misogyny, often in, like,

leftist spaces, right? Cause that's a

real thing. Misogyny is pretty rampant on

the left as it is everywhere. And I think

that a lot of women find that hard to

complain about. And it's difficult in part

because men usually are in power. I don't

know, you kind of, as a woman, you kind

of have to, like, pander to men to get

through the day to some extent.

(Matt) Yeah

So, it's like frightening to take a stand

against men. But trans people this kind

of, like, hated minority that is sort of

easy to, like, it's kind of easy to,

like, dump all of your, like, frustrations

and rage onto trans people because

there's a social momentum behind that

in a way that there sort of isn't against,

like, I don't know, frustration with

misogyny and leftist spaces, for example.

I honestly kinda feel bad for Ana reading

these tweets because obviously there's

some massive life, as she says, a lifetime

of, like, of difficult experiences that's

behind this. And it's blowing up now, but

it's choosing as its target, this very

weird thing that seems to me, to be

slightly off topic.

So these tweets are in March. And then in

July, she is still kind of stuck on

this transgender issue. In a discussion

about various social justice movements

and their methods for accomplishing

their goals, she tweets what I have

selected as to be tweet number three.

Which I will send to you now.

- Oh, this one (scoffs) Yeah this is...
- (Matt laughs)

Okay, and see this is (stutters)
okay, this

tweet- I know I'm talking about the

tweet before I've read it. But I do feel

that this tweet that I'm about to read,

it really kind of does showcase the way

that transphobia is kind of a red flag and

it's often the prelude to a whole bunch

of nonsense. Okay (breaths deeply)

Ana Kasparian quote, "The Civil Rights

Movement did not use the same strategies

as the trans movement. They didn't

barricade speakers they disagreed with in

a classroom for three hours. They

persuaded through non-violence and

showing America their humanity."

So this is (exhales) this is basically the

entire thing that the podcast called,

"The Witch Trials of J.K. Rowling" was

about, um. This was what the podcast with

Megan Phelps-Roper of Westboro Baptist

Church fame, uh and J.K. Rowling. A lot

of the argument was, like, "Oh, what we

really hate about the trans movement is

they use, like, illiberal methods. And

it's so unlike all past movements. Like

Gay Rights wasn't like this, and Women's

Rights wasn't like this, and the Civil

Rights Movement, they never did anything

violent and they were always polite and

they never raised their voices and they

never called people names." And it's just,

like, "Well I'm sorry that is historically

not true."

And it's so jarring to see someone like

- Ana Kasparian, who knows all of that,
- (Natalie) Knows, yeah.

though. She knows all of that. I mean, all

of these movements had (stammers)

You think about that one famous, uh,

clip of Angela Davis talking about, like,

whether or not she endorses violence.

And she's just like, "Well, whether or not

I endorse it is besides the point.

Violence is the only thing I've ever known

as a black person in America. "

Have these people heard of Malcolm X?

Have they heard (stammers and scoffs)

Stonewall! Like, come on!

What do these people think the Civil

Rights Movement was? Like, I mean, it's

literally every one of these movements,

too. Like, I mean, again, people think of

Women's Suffrage assumes to be like,
you know,

you think of the women marching with

their banners and it's like, "Oh, they

just had to show people their humanity by

being peaceful," and it's like, churches

were firebombed (scoffs) by suffragettes

in the U.K. People were physically,

they were murdered for Women's Suffrage.

Which is not to say that I am endorsing

these violent methods, but it's like,

I'm about to get so demonetized.

Wait, hold on, I can- let me rephrase that

People were unalived
(Matt laughs)

People were unalived
in the name of women's suffrage, right,

churches became more on fire
than they previously had been,

in the name of women's suffrage, right,

like, this is the historical reality

that people forget because it's
sort of more comfortable I guess

to assume that like, oh,
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. just had to

get up on a podium and say "I have a dream, look

I'm human and then all the white people clapped and said

"Yes, let's have rights for all"
and it's like no, that's not what happened

To desegregate schools in Alabama,
president Eisenhower had to

send in the army, desegregation happened
at gunpoint, it was not a peaceful process

I hope that trans rights can be
accomplished with less violence than that,

and I think, in fact, there's no reason
why that shouldn't be the case

But to suggest that the trans rights movement
is this uniquely violent- it's just isn't

It just isn't. It's just false.

You've tead me up. We've arrived at
Holocaust denialism.

We sure have.

Two weeks ago, JK Rowling
saw a tweet someone had written to her

"The Nazis burnt books on trans healthcare
and research, why are you so desperate

to uphold their ideology around gender?"

And, this obviously pissed her off a lot,
because she screenshotted it

and, uh, tweeted it out to her
own audience,

with the additional caption,
where she wrote,

"I just....how How did you type this out
and press send without thinking

'I should maybe check my source for this,
because it might've been a fever dream?'"

And, I just want to add,
before we get into any of this,

my favorite thing about this exchange
is that the tweet which JK Rowling took

which accused her of sharing the Nazi's
ideaology on, uh, trans healthcare,

the tweet has five views.

Not likes.

Wow.

It has five views. That is zero likes.

That is, like, you get five views on
a tweet just by it existing in the ether.

Yeah, that is a-I mean I've almost
never seen a tweet with that few views.

She- [laughing] she went out of her way

to find a tweet that would allow her to

participate in Holocaust denial.

It was like she had to chase this one.

Yeah, that makes it all the more baffling
because it's, like,

okay, I understand why you would say-
why you would start doing

a little casual Holocaust denial
in the heat of the moment,

because, if, I don't know,
you were like on the spot

and like, I don't know, someone was-
someone was- someone had you

backed into a corner and you were just,
like, said whatever you thought you needed

to say to win the argument-

[Matt] Right

-but it's like, this is just, like,
this is just like freeform, like,

completely, like, out of the blue.

You know what, I've been searching
around the dark corners of Twitter lately

and I feel like today is the day
I shall begin denying the Holocaust.

[Matt laughing]

Like, like what?

You need to buy a yacht and just
go on it!

So she tweet this, right?
And so the person accuses-

the person's claim is that Nazis burnt
books on trans healthcare and research,

and JK Rowling says that they must be
experiencing a fever dream

to have claim that.

That is absolutely true.

The Nazis did ban, uh, hordes of books,
of some of the earliest and most important

at the time books on trans healthcare and
research.

Specifically what this person is referencing,

is, uh, the burning of the library of
the Institute for Sexual Research.

So, just, a little bit of quick history:

There was this young doctor, young gay doctor,

in Germany, his name was
Magnus Hirschfeld,

in 1919, he opened the-
I'm gonna, I'm gonna do my best German voice-

the Institute for Sexualwissenschaft.

Which, translates roughly to
the Institute for Sexual Research.

It was the first sexology research center
in the world.

You know, Hirschfeld was gay,
he had grown up in a deeply homophobic

era of Germany, he was super
traumatized, not only by being gay

but witnessing homophobia against
other queer people.

He would later go on to talk about having
witnessed in medical school,

watching a fellow gay student who was
trotted out naked in front of a class

to be humiliated by the rest of the class
for being a quote-unquote degenerate.

So, at this Institute of Sexual Research,
which he opened,

he basically had all of these gay and
trans patients

who he would treat for various
needs.

There were anti-crossdressing laws
in Germany at the time, and he

would get his trans patients this, like,
special transgender ID card

that, like, by today's standards would be,
y'know, strange and demoralizing,

but at the time, it actually legally
protected them from being prosecuted

under these crossdressing laws.

If the cops came up to you, you were like,
"Here's my trans ID, see I'm a certified

transgender," and then they'd be like,
"Okay, you're-" y'know,

Magnus Hirschfeld was- this was, like,
gay-trans, like, cis gay to trans allyship.

Also in the Institute of Sexual Research,
there was among the first libraries

about sexuality and gender.

And this guy was collecting research
a hundred years ago on these topics

that would be considered progressive today.

Um, there was some of the earliest
literature on the various gender-affirming

surgeries, and by 1930,
the Institute was performing some of the

first, you know, what we think of today
as modern gender-affirming surgeries

in the world.

And who was one of his patients?

Lili Elbe.

Lili Elbe!

The Danish girl.

Was one of his patients!

You know, so, the Nazi party comes to rise,

and Hitler wanted to cleanse society of
you know, what he deemed lives

unworthy of living.

On May 6th, 1933, the Nazis raided
the Institute of Sexual Research,

and burned 20,000 of its books
in the street.

And, this was, like, very famously, like,
one of the first Nazi book burnings.

Like, there are photos of it, this isn't,
like, deep buried-

No, it's not obscure. It's not obscure stuff.

It's like one of the most famous photos
of Nazi book burning,

which I guarantee most people have seen.

And, so, this initial tweet that
JK Rowling called this person

basically insane for writing was

"The Nazis burnt books on trans healthcare
and research. Why are you so desperate

to uphold their ideology around gender?"

And so this is just factually true.

Right? Like, whatever you think of
JK Rowling, like, the Nazis did do that,

and she does share their view on trans
healthcare in gen-

like, that's just what's happening.

And so, people start to point out
that, like, babe, you know,

you're doing a little bit of Holocaust
denial by saying that this didn't happen.

Alejandra Caraballo, who is a notable
trans person on Twitter,

she responded, writing, "You're
engaging in Holocaust denial."

JK Rowling responds, "Neither of your
articles support the contention that trans

people were the first victims of the Nazis
or that all research on trans healthcare

was burned in 1930s Germany.
You are engaging in lying, Alejandra."

So, she responds by being, like,
pedantic.

I don't know, it's hard to take-
it's hard to respect this.

It's not engaging at all with, like,
the spirit of what anyone is saying.

I mean, so, first of all, like, we can get-
I mean, we can, and it is interesting,

like, to dive into the actual, like,
historical record of this,

and the way that some of the, you know,
first, like, Nazi book burnings were,

in fact, targeting an early library of
books about gay rights and about

transgender, you know, medicine.

But it also, you know, like,
even without talking about the factual

record, like, like, let's think
big picture here.

Do we really think that the National
Socialist Party was [stammers]

would have just been fine with transgender
people? Like, right?

Like, oh, no, they're against the gays,
and they're against the Jews,

and they're against the Romani, but
sure, that the- the transvestites,

yeah we love them!

Like, like, what?

I mean, and of course, we can verify
historically that, yes, trans people

were persecuted.

I- I've seen a lot of what I consider
extremely bad faith discourse about this

controversy with people saying, like,
"Well, the Nazis didn't have, like, the

category transgender, which is a more
recent invention,"

and yes, that's true, but, like,
okay the Nazis didn't officially persecute

lesbians, either, because I don't think
that- because, I mean, if you look

at the history of, like, lesbophobia,

often the form that lesbophobia takes
is that lesbians are just not seen as real,

right? It's just sort of not acknowledged,
even, as a valid phenomenon, where

male homosexuality is seen as degeneracy,
and then that's something to be persecuted.

Oftentimes, it's just kind of like flatly
denied that lesbians exist.

Now, does that just say that no lesbians
were persecuted in the Holocaust?

Almost certainly not.

I know that like the Nazis had these
categories of like asocial.

[Matt] Correct.

Like, this like, it's like a black triangle
that's like the badge-

[Matt] Yeah

-and I think that a lot of
queer women were sort of

killed on the, on the basis of
being asocial, quote unquote.

So, this kind of, pedantry of being
kind of, well, technically the Nazis

didn't use the wo- like, okay,
but they [stammers] they still killed

queer women, and they still
killed trans people.

So, like, why are you playing this
pedantic game to-

why- because [stammers] they're
engaging in denial of transphobia, right?

[Matt] Well, and it's so exhausting too
because she writes,

"The contention that trans people were the
first victims of the Nazis were that all

or that all research on trans healthcare
was burned in the 1930s."

And it's like she's arguing against the
point that nobody made.

[Natalie] Yeah, she didn't say that-
did Alejandra say that?

[Matt] No!

[Natalie] Did she say that every single
piece of research was destroyed?

[Matt] No! Alejandra didn't say that,
and the original tweet that JK Rowling

said was insane, once again, just said,
"The Nazis burned books on trans healthcare

and research."

That was the claim.

[Natalie] Yeah, so she's consistently,
like, arguing against positions that no one

has taken.

[Matt] Correct, and it's, like,
instead of ever admitting fault,

and, right, and- and she just
shifts the goalpost over and over.

And then that leads you-

Really, with transphobia or with anything
like if you refuse to admit fault in

anything that you say, you will keep
shifting the goalpost because

that will be the only way, that,
in your head, you can maintain

the upper hand in an argument.

This refusal to admit being wrong ever
leads you to some fucking whacky places.

It led her to Holocaust denialism, and it
led Ana Kasparian to saying that

the Civil Rights Movement was entirely
peaceful.

Which, she knows that that's not true!

[Natalie] Well, it's like, if you make-
if you can never admit that you're wrong

about anything, if you make one wrong
turn, you'll never get on the right path

again.

[Matt] Right.

[Natalie] Because if you don't admit that
you've made a wrong turn, then you

can't correct it.

So, I feel like that is part of the-
the fallacy that's going on here

where, like, okay, JK Rowling can't
admit that she was ever wrong about

anything, and so, she has no choice but
to double down and triple down and

quadruple down and just keep walking
in this terrible direction, basically, right?

To completely mix my metaphors.

That's why she has, and will continue to
say more absurd and dangerous things;

because that is the only option
that she has, if she can't admit

that she made a wrong turn somewhere.

[Matt] I want to talk a little bit
about this, like, transphobia to, like,

general right-wing madness pipeline
a little bit.

Media Matters conducted this study where
they made a TikTok account

and in that TikTok account, they only
liked exclusively anti-trans content

to see what the For You Page algorithm
would then feed the account.

Very quickly, the videos-
and they did an analysis of like four hundred

videos that TikTok then fed into their

For You Page-

did not just keep feeding them transphobic
videos, but racist videos, misogynistic

videos, anti-vax and kind of other
right-wing conspiracy theories,

a lot of antisemetic conspiracy theories,

type content

I think thats interesting

because I think it reflects what

we see when poeple engange with

transphobia in real life.

And so, what do you think,

first of all, what do you think makes

tranpohobia, um, including this like

terf-y transphobic feminism thing, like

what do you think makes it a

fundamentally right wing idiology,

and one that is so affective and sucks

people in that way?

[Natalie]
Well, I think, yeah, I definitley think

thats true, that transphobia is a gateway

bigotry, like its often will be like the

prelude to a bunch more other forms of

bigorty that people, I feel like feel

I think transphobia is sort of a socially

acceptable still,
[Matt] Mhm

[Natalie] Than a lot of other forms of

bigotry, so that will often be the one

that people decide to publicly declare

but I also think that, what is it about

transphobia that makes it distinctivley

right-wing? And I feel like it has to do

with the kind- of structure of basically

scapegoating a vulnerable minority, and

then blaming them for various social

problems, right? So I feel that predjudice

usually sort of operates that way, or its

one common type of prejudice right?

And a case of someone like J.K Rowling,

It seems like trans people are kind of

functionally taking the place of

patriarchy right? In her arguments, so

like where the left- wing person would

notice the kind of structure of power,

and the kind of broader inequalities

you know, that are the reason why women

are opressed, instead of doing that, you

take the kind of way that right- wing

women go, which is, you almost sort of

accept the patriarchy as natural and

inevitable, and you instead displace that

frustration onto immigrants, onto
[Matt] Mhmmm

you know, instead of complaining about

you know, men, men who are your brothers

or you complain about muslim men, right?

Or you complain about the Jews, or you

complain about, in this case, trans people

Umm, (Stammers), In the 70s, for

Anita Bryant, it was gay people, right?

It's this kind of, sort of shifting

scapegoat and trans people

are the curent scapegoat of choice for

a lot of people.

But, it, the strucutre of argument and

the psychology behind it is very

similar to like, many many other, you know

bigoted movements, I mean I think also

theres this element of amnesia,

where people sort of forget how similar

this current world panic is to like

homophobia from the Bush era.

[Matt] Totally

[Natalie] Including things like, the

linguistic obsession, like why?

Does no one remember the arguments that

people used to have back then? I guess
I'm just old, but people used to

[Laughter]

Like I don't know, I remember the 2000s,
I remember people having a similar

semantic hang up on the word marriage,

where like, I don't know, like the phrase

"Her wife" Right? Was seen by a lot of

people as like, not just like sacreligious

as blasphemy, as a kind of sin, but also

as a kind of, like, an attack on, like

meaning itself. An attack on the English

language, like "Her wife", being this like

total nonsense, right? In the same way

that I think like "His uterus",

or whatever, seems to create upset with

people today
-[Matt] Mmmm

[Natalie] Umm, right so again (Stammers)

"They're re-defining marriage" That was

such, like a slogan, in those days,

it sort of avoids taking a political

stance, like really what they're mad about

is the social equality of gay people.

Right? But the way that they present their

argument is as if they're like, I don't

know, pettance about grammar, or

something, there was really concerns,

there was words being redefined

which, I don't know it doesn't make sense

for that to be something that you feel
passionate about in my opinion

but it's because thats not what they're
really passionate about right?

The semantic thing is a cover for a social
and political thing. So I see transphobia

in the 2020s, as like , sort of almost

functionally identical to homophobia in

the 2000s, in terms of like, the role

that it plays in politics, and in terms of

the types of arguments that people make
in it's favor

[Matt] And speaking about gay, something

that J.K. Rowling does a lot is like speak

on behalf of concerned lesbians, she does

a lot of this posting which, I don't know

if you have feelings about this but she
does a lot of this posting about like,

you know,

"All of the work that gays fought for

bravely is being undone by radical trans
activists" and its like J.K. Rowling,

first of all, you are not gay. (laughter)
[Natalie] Yeah.

[Matt] Take a seat, but it's also like,

it pi**** me off too because she does

this, she has more of a reach that like,

almost any gay person in the world, and

she does this thing where she'll speak on

behalf of gay people being like

"Gays don't want"
She echoes the like,

"Gays want a divorce from the trans and
queer people" you know,

"Political divorce". She does that
rhetoric a lot, and I'm like

you're not gay, you don't know what the
f*** you're talking about

and also like, the majority of cis gay
people are entirely cool with trans people

and down with the cause,

So what the hell are you talking about!?

[Natalie] Yeah it's one of the most
disgusting, honestly

things that she does, I think it's the
way she constantly-

insetead of speaking for herself, in the
first person, she constantly speaks

particularly chooses lesbians as the kind
of banner for whatever she wants to say

and she (Stammers) charitably, or like
chivalrously, almost like defending the

lesbians,
[Matt] Totally

[Natalie] (Stammers) As if thats the
reason she's involved in this

and, again it just

the claims again don't make any sense,
right?

"Oh we're eroding all the rights that gay
activists fought for"

Okay which rights are those? Did gay
activists fight for the rights not to use

trans peoples pronouns?
[Matt] (Laughter)

[Natalie] Like which part of the gay
rights struggle did that occur in?

And the thing is true like

"Oh womens rights are being eroded, the
rights that we fought so hard for"

And it's like well, but which rights? This

is just not a thing in the history of
feminism.

Women never had to fight for the right to

like, bathrooms segregated by chromosomes.

That was never a thing. I feel like

patriarchy never had a problem with
there being separate bathrooms. Right?

That was never a thing

that women had to fight for. In fact, if
anything, it was sorta the opposite.

The threat of unisex bathrooms was used

by Phyllis Schlafly in the 70s as a

kind of "Ooh, like, this is what's gonna
happen if you pass an Equal Rights

Amendment."

[Matt] Mhm.
[Natalie] Right? It's like a scare thing.

In order to, like, to stifle feminism.

Separate sex-segregated bathrooms has
never been a thing that feminists needed

to fight for.

[Matt] Yeah, wow. That is such a—

Phyllis Schlafly did say that. With the
Equal Rights Amendment, she was like,

"There are gonna be no more women's
rooms." Y'know?

"If equal rights passes, and men
and women are considered equal

in the eyes of the law, then all bathrooms

are gonna be unisex."

And it's literally like the same stupid,

like, they're erasing the word "woman".

It's the same shit over and over.

It's like this fear-mongering about things
that even they know are not gonna happen.

It's the same kinda slippery slope

argument where it's like, "Ok, but if men

and women have equal rights, then there

will be no basis on which women

aren't sent to war and there will be no

basis on which, you know, we shouldn't

just have only one bathroom and it's the

same kinda thing as like, oh, if you sorta
legally and socially recognize trans

people, then they just list off all the

exact same things that Phyllis Schlafly
said were gonna happen if there was an

Equal Rights Amendment.

And it's like if we allow gay people to
get married, then what's next?

Dogs? Like–
[Matt] (laughter)

[Natalie] (laughter) Like, "Where's the
line?"

Well, the line is somewhere, right?
[Matt] (laughing) Right.

We're not talking about whether there

should be a line at all. But for them,

it's like moving the line or slightly

altering our semantic usage is tantamount

to total destruction of the entire

system of meaning. Right? So that the word

"woman" will mean nothing now. And the

word "marriage" will mean nothing now.
And, you know, chaos will break out

and there'll be fornication in the streets

and there will be—like no, there won't be!

No, there won't be.

[Matt] J.K. Rowling has literally become
one of these people who, 15 years ago, was

like, "The gays are tearing at the social
fabric of society."

That's literally just what she's doing.

But replace gay with trans.
[Natalie] The social fabric of society.

[Matt] The social fabric of society!
That's what they would always say.

[Natalie] Right, and then they put a sorta
pseudo-feminist twist on it where it's

like, oh, you will have destroyed the
ability to talk about being a woman.

Because if we say the phrase "trans women
are women", then suddenly, women can no

longer talk about all those struggles that

J.K. Rowling interestingly already never

talks about.
[Matt] (laughing) Right.

That's the other thing—is that she claims

that her whole thing is feminism. But the

only thing she ever talks about is,

you know, disparaging trans people.

[Natalie] Well, I think about it this way,
J.K. Rowling is a victim of domestic

violence. And think about how powerful a

thing it could've been if she decided to

speak about that in some context where the

focus was on domestic violence and

stopping domestic violence.

But she never said a word about it and

never has since. Except when she was

kind of inserting it into the middle of a

multi-paragraph tirade against trans

people. There's so much potential here

for her to be a powerful spokesperson for

an actually good and worthy cause, but

instead she only brings it up for the

point of oppressing trans people.
[Matt] Mm.

It's like this piece in this terrible game

of chess that she's playing and that she

never sort of brings up women's rights in

any other context.

[Matt] So where does this leave us today?
Well.

(sighs) I wrote down, "J.K. Rowling has

kind of a cult-like status in the

anti-trans community. She's kind of

their queen."
[Natalie] Well, of course. I mean,

she's in a way the best thing that ever
happened to them, right?

[Matt] Yeah.
[Natalie] I mean, if you were a kind of,

sort of fringe bigot movement.

In a way, the best thing that could

possibly happen to you is someone as

famous and as loved as J.K. Rowling was

—and, to a large extent, still is—

to kind of become the champion of your

cause. Right? So it is good for them,

I think. But I also think that for

J.K. Rowling, she's now wedded to this and

this is now like half of her legacy.

[Matt] And it's certainly the part of her
legacy, at this point, that she cares the

most about because she sees herself as a—

[Natalie] Yeah.

[Matt] —warrior standing up for women's
rights and you know what? As many people

as there are like you and I

who are willing to get into the weeds of

how dangerous all of this shit is. She has

millions of people online who worship the

ground she walks on, not in spite of the

TERF shit, but because of it.

[Natalie] Yeah.

[Matt] There are a lot of people who
sincerely view as the feminist of our time

which sucks.

[Natalie] Yeah, it does. Well, especially
when it's coming at the expense of a lot

of attention that could be going towards

feminist issues that matter. Like again,

I live in a country where we just

overturned the right to abortion and

instead of talking about that, the most

famous author in the world has decided to

lead a crusade against transgender people.

[Matt] She's currently—she and Elon Musk,

which, I don't know, does she ever see the
- [Natalie] (laughs)

people who she's aligning herself with?

Does she ever see the people who are

defending her? Fucking Putin defended her!

- [Natalie] Yeah, yeah.
- [Matt] Did you see that?

Oh my god, I'm gonna insert the clip of
- [Natalie] I did, yeah.

- [Matt] Putin defending her.
- [Natalie] Yeah, play the clip.

[Translator] They canceled Joanne Rowling

recently, the children's author—her books

are published all over the world—just

because she didn't satisfy the demands of

gender rights.

Like, I don't know, do ever just stop and

sit down and be like, "Wow, my comrades

are Elon Musk and Vladimir Putin."
- [Natalie] And Vlad Putin, yeah.

[Matt] (laughs) "I must be on the good
side." (laughs again)

Cancel culture is coming for everyone now.

Russia, J.K. Rowling—(laughs) like what?
- [Matt] (laughs)

I'm sorry, what? It just doesn't—(sighs)

What the fuck is going on? So yeah, so she

and Elon Musk are kind of outspokenly

campaigning against this new hate crime

law in Scotland that would make it illegal

to "stir up hatred against protected

characteristics". So, you know, of course,

Joanne Rowling is fighting against this

because that's all she does now and that's

all she's done for the last 5 years, is
- [Natalie] Yes.

stir up hatred against protected

characteristics, being trans people. And

it's just, I don't know, one of those

things too, where it's like, do you ever

find yourself campaigning against a hate

crime law?

(laughs)

And wonder, "It's me. (laughs) I'm the

problem." (laughs again)

Well, I think that's the problem, is that,

at this point, I don't think there's any

moment that could cause her to have the

realization that "I'm the problem", right?
- [Matt] Right.

It's like that part of her brain has shut

down. It's scary to think how far that she

could go with this because I don't think

there is a limit.

I don't think there is a limit and

speaking of where this leads, obviously it

leads to so many dark places and damaging

and harmful places, but every now and then

transphobia and just the brainworms that

come with it can lead to some truly

spectacular results and so, I want to end—

we're gonna revisit, actually, the woman

who kind of kicked this all off, which is

Maya Forstater.

(laughs) My favorite.

Her feud with Tala.

So (laughs)—

Goddamn Tala.

(laughing continues)

Tala the most sinister figure ever to—

(laughing continues) In 2022, a chain of

libraries in the United Kingdom updated

their mascot from (laughs)—

[Matt] I need to pull it together.
I need to pull it together.

A chain of libraries in the UK updated

their mascot from what was a mama bear

reading to its little child bear to Tala,

a cartoon baby alien-looking thing.

Very adorable, big eyes, little pink nose,

green skin, just adorable little baby

alien Tala. Tala's gender was not

specified and the library referred to the

updated mascot using they/them pronouns.

Maya Forstater—

[Matt] I'm gonna send you the tweet. You
have to read them.

Can you do the voice?

I got it, I got it, yeah.

[Matt] (laughs)

(laughs) I've been training for years for

this moment.

(laughs)

[Natalie] Also, Tala, yes, Tala looks

gender-neutral because Tala looks like a

toddler. That's what toddlers looks like.

[Matt] (laughing) Right.
[Natalie] Right? (laughs)

Toddlers don't—they don't have secondary

sex characteri- like, what are we doing
here?

(laughs)
[Natalie] (laughs)

Like?

Alright. (sighs) Here's Maya Forstater.

[Natalie] (British accent) "Some more
thoughts about Bookstart Bear and Tala

because no, I don't buy the sneering

argument that this is not important. Stuff

about young children and mothers is not

beneath consideration. That's feminism."

So (laughs)—

[Natalie] (regular voice) And then below,

there's a picture of two alternate logos

for the Hertfordshire County Library, one

of whom is the Bookstart Bear and the

other of whom is Tala the alien.

"I don't buy the sneering argument that

this is not important."

(laughs) This turns into kind of a

multi-day tirade for her and the library

ultimately responds. The library addresses

the issue and so I'm gonna send you that.

[Natalie] (British accent) "A mother with
her baby daughter at HitchinLibrary,

at HertsLibraries' Rhyme Time, aimed at

0- to 5-year-olds, messaged me:

(regular voice) "Bookstart Bear has been

retired and replaced with Talia, a "trans"

bear, with they/them pronouns. I cannot

express how upset I feel. Why do children
need this?""

And then the library responds to the tweet

saying, "Just to confirm—Tala isn't trans.

They are an alien."

So obviously Maya was not done at that.

I think she did like—what? It must've been
30 tweets.

Oh yeah, she has—and I have a couple more

if you wanna round it out.

Oh yeah, yeah, let's go in.

Yeah. (laughs)

[Natalie] (British accent) "Tala is an
"otherwordly creature". The publicity

doesn't even say alien. But one thing that

is clear is it is an infant. Big eyes, big

head, and to emphasize it, toddler's

clothing. So where does this infant—who

"takes they/them pronouns", parents are

told—come from? Where are its parents? Did

it hatch from an egg or was it born from a

mama? Who looks after its interests?

Ask these questions and you get the usual

"you are obsessing about genitals.""

(laughs) So there are like a hundred more

tweets that she writes about Tala.
(laughing)

Yeah. There's so many tweets. There's so

many tweets. And it's so fixated on the

biological reproductive origins of this—

What about the three-eyed alien from

Toy Story? Was that hatched from an egg?

Like, did Tala come out of a vagina?

We need to know which vagina Tala came out

of, if any, and if so, how—

I mean this is an interesting—

'Cause you know how, I don't know,

anything gay people've done is viewed by

homophobes as inherently sexual. I feel

like the second you—

Just simply using they/them pronouns for a

cartoon character is enough to send these

people spiralling into a crisis about the

nature of life on earth.

(laughs)

(laughing) Where they're like, "Ok, well—"

They just need to—

Why do you need to know how a cartoon

character was spawned? I feel like we

don't do this with the Berenstain Bears.

(laughs) I guess they're bears, so
- [Matt] (laughs)

presumably mammalian reproduction. But

I don't know. I feel like it's pretty

common for cartoon characters for

children not to go into intricate detail

about the precise nature of how they were

biologically conceived.

(laughs)

It's just like a weird, I don't know, this

is a weird thing to spiral about.

She's just tweeting over and over again

about like, "Was a dick inserted into a

vagina to reproduce this? And then it's a—
- [Natalie] (laughs)

[Matt] —picture of little green Tala.
(laughing)

I just don't see this and think about its

immaculate conception and I think to see a

cartoon character of this nature and for

that to be the thing that you fixate on

for multiple days, that's the brainrot,
right?

Yeah.

It's this and Holocaust denial.

Right, there's real things going on in the

world and this is what they're talking

about. I feel like it's, you know, we've

kinda gone over a bunch of people who get

upset about essentially nothing, whether

it's Tala or whether it's, I don't know,

the hypothetical use of the phrase

"person with a uterus" or it's the totally

crazy idea that somehow trans people are

going to destroy the concept of woman

itself. All of this is nonsense and it's

very funny to laugh at, but at the end of

the day, it's being said in a context where

trans people's right to healthcare is

being legislated away.

Yeah.
- [Natalie] And that's the kind of sad

other side to this coin which is that as

silly as all these arguments are, they

ultimately are being made in the service

of something that's gonna hurt a lot of
people.

Yeah. Yeah. And so, what I want to end on

is just like the rabbithole to go down,

whether it's through anger about Tala or

anger about, you know, this fear based on

nothing, like that your identity as a cis

woman is gonna be era-

Like, what do you see as an effective way

to stop it before it starts for people?

Is it just being aware of dogwhistles?

Yeah, it's being aware of the dogwhistles

and it's also trying to redirect

conversations back to the things that

really matter. It's so hard to avoid

getting completely derailed by these kind

of pseudo debates about semantics, right?

Like the "sex is real" stuff.

[Natalie] There's some part of me that

thinks, "Oh, we shouldn't be too mean to

people when they start with those

dogwhistles because I fear that kind of

pushes them further into this spiral, but

also I feel like not calling out the

dogwhistles is bad 'cause we—

Those of us who have been doing this long

enough, we know what they are and we have

experience with this and it's hard to

suppress your own pattern recognition at a
certain point.

[Natalie] (sighs)

Trans people are losing their healthcare

and we're fussing over the exact

terminology used in medical paperwork and

stuff, and I don't know, is this a good

priority? Is this really the most pressing

thing affecting women or affecting trans

people today? Like no, not even close.

You know, this is like a circus sideshow

that somehow manages to absorb so much of

people's energy. It's really frustrating

me when it's public figures—

Mm.
- [Natalie] —who should know that—

You know, don't get led into little traps

like this, right?
- [Matt] Mm.

Don't get baited into opening up the
- [Matt] Mm.

funnel of bigotry. Because I feel like

that's, you know, what a lot of these

people do, like even if they don't say

outright, "Oh, I hate trans people. Trans

people should be persecuted legally."

They sort of drop you off in front of the

door to those types of position where

someone who actually does think that,

like Ron DeSantis or Donald Trump or

whoever it is. It's kind of priming people

for receptivity to those more sinister
arguments.

Mm.

I mean, it sounds like with J.K. Rowling,

she's already at the most sinister end

where, you know, denial is fundamental

part of bigotry and denying that trans

people were persecuted by the Third Reich

is pretty heinous.

Oh, one other thing I wanna say is that I

know some pedantic people are gonna be

like, "Um, technically, she's not denying

the Holocaust because she accepts the

Holocaust happened. She just doesn't think

that people were persecuted because they

were trans." And it's like, okay, well,

that's still a form of denial because even

if the category "transgender" was not

something that was used by the Nazis,

the category "degenerate" existed,

the category "homosexual" existed,

and the category "asocial" existed,

and trans people absolutely were

persecuted under those labels. And also,

there were transsexual people. That was

the word they used back—

I believe the word "transsexual" was

actually coined by Magnus Hirschfeld.

And so, there, absolutely, yes, were

people who were killed and their ideas

burned for being trans in that sense, so
yeah.

She's also just wrong.

She's also just wrong. And you know what?

We didn't make this for J.K. Rowling.

She's too far gone, but you're not.

No, no no no no.
- [Matt] Your mom's not, your sister's

not, so send this to someone who is just

saying, "Well, sex is real, right? Sex is

real. And you can dress however you please

and sleep with any consenting adult who

will have you."
- [Natalie] (laughs)

[Matt] (chokes on laughter)

I'm so sorry, she really did get off to a

rocky start with that one though.

"Consenting adult that will have you"?

Like yeah, fucking obviously.

It's all the implication, right? (laughs)

Well, okay, wait, but this is actually one

last question that I wanna ask you before

we go—I know, I keep saying we're gonna

end on this—we are gonna end on this.

Because there's a lot of people who buy

into these sort of more tentative

transphobic things like, "Well, yeah, sex

is real" or "But I just don't know if

there are two genders" or whatever. In the

case of J.K. Rowling, do you think that

she has been ideologically, in private,

where she is now the entire time and that

she was just better at hiding it in those

early years, whereas now, the mask is

"fully off"? Or do you think she descended

into madness in the way that she's
presented it?

Well, I kinda think both. I think, in a

sense, she has always been transphobic and

as evidence I will point to the first time

that J.K. Rowling and transphobia appeared

together in public discourse was actually
2018.

Oh! It was before the "sex is real" tweet.

Yeah, it was before the "sex is real"

tweet. Actually, it was Shon Faye, author

of the book "The Transgender Issue".

[Natalie] She says: "Trans culture is
seeing the beloved author of your

generation like a transphobic tweet from a

troll account which has repeatedly called
you a man".

This is March 2018. And the tweet that

J.K. Rowling liked says: "I was shouted at

by men at my first Labour Party meeting,

aged 18, because I asked them to remove a

Page 3 calendar. I've been told to toughen

up, be louder, stronger, independent.

I've often not felt supported. Men in

dresses get brocialist solidarity I never

had. That's misogyny!"

Wait, so in March 2018, she liked a tweet

referring to trans women as men in
dresses.

Yeah, in March 2018, she liked a tweet
- [Matt] Oh.

referring to trans women as men in dresses

and then, when she got backlash for it,

she initially claimed that she liked the

tweet accidentally in a "middle-aged
moment".

Okay, Joanne.
- [Matt] She said,

"A middle-aged moment". I mean, I have

middle-aged moments too, but I don't like

deranged transphobic tweets.

And she also later admitted that that was

a lie, like her, I guess, publicist told
- [Matt] Mm.

her to say that it was an accident, but in

her essay called "TERF Wars", she admits

that she did like it on purpose.

So, I don't know, I think that in a sense,

yeah, she's been on the "trans women are

men in dresses" or whatever thing since

before this was even a widely discussed

public issue, but I also find it unlikely

that she was this obsessed with it until

more recently. I think it was probably

kind of a background bigotry and then, by

sort of receiving a lot of public

backlash, I feel like the need to defend

her bigotry led her into this spiral where

it became the defining issue that she
talks about.

Yeah, there's something to be said for the

feedback loop, and we've all, I mean,
anyone—

We're all Facebook moms in a way because,

you know, when someone kind of baits you

into arguing with them in the comments

section of something online, you wanna

argue back, 'cause you wanna be right.

We're all Facebook moms.
- [Natalie] Yeah.

We are all Facebook moms. And something

that sucks about J.K. Rowling is that

having millions of dollars and being a

beloved childhood icon did not prevent her

from becoming the worst type of Facebook
mom.

Well, unfortunately, the fame and wealth

is, if anything, insulation against the

need to take a step back. No one can tell

her what to do. No one can tell her what

to do, no one can take her phone away,

no one can tell her to step away and maybe

think about this a little bit. She has too

much power. She can't be stopped. That, in

a way, is bad for her because sometimes

you need someone to tell you these things,

right? Sometimes you need someone to tell

you, "Mm, maybe put down Twitter for a

while" or "Mm, maybe you should rethink

this", right? I think that it's kind of

important to have someone in your life

tell you that you might have messed up a

little bit and the sense I get with

J.K. Rowling is that there's just no one.

There's just no one who's saying those
things.

Mm.

It's all gas and no brakes. She can't seem
to stop.

Natalie. Wait, okay, lemme think about a
good—

We've reached the conclusion. We've

reached the conclusion! (stretches)

I need to get up from this fuckin' chair.

Okay. (laughing) Sorry, that was not

graceful. That was not a graceful
transition.

It's perfect.
- [Matt] (laughs)

Well, I feel like it captures the fatigue
of J.K. Rowling.

Yeah, and fixating on her for 5 years to

the point where you've memorized the

lyrics to her tweets.

We've been broken by this woman. (laughs)
- [Matt] (wheezing laughter)

Natalie, thank you so much for coming here

once again and spending a couple hours

talking about this woman whom we are tired

of discussing. But you know what? I really

do think there is something to learn from

her situation. I think she's too far gone,

but, like I said, I think most normal

people aren't. I really do think learning

from her wrong turns can hopefully help

other people make the right turns, so I'm

grateful that someone who's smarter about

this than I am was here to explain it.
Thank you.

Well, thank you so much for having me on.

It was nice talking to you again.

Where can people—

I mean, whatever, I'm saying, "Where can

people find you?" as if you're not more

famous than me, but in case someone

listening to this doesn't know (laughing)—

where can people find you and support your

work and hear more of you?

Well, my Youtube channel is called

ContraPoints and I also am on Twitter, but

don't bother, just follow me on Youtube.

That's where I put in the (laughs)—

That's where I actually devote work and I

have a couple of videos about J.K. Rowling

if you're just dying for more of this

topic, but I also talk about, you know,

other things. I don't know, there's

probably some people—

I mean, those videos have a lot of views.

There's obviously people out there who

cannot get enough of the Rowling
discourse.

(laughing) Yeah.

Thank you so much for having me and I,

yeah, anytime. Especially if we wanna do

another—

We should do a whole Tala episode.

(laughing) Yeah. Next time, yeah, as a

redemption for both of our mental health,

next time, we're just gonna talk for an

hour about Tala and worship them.

Yeah, Tala our new god.

(laughs) I love you all so so so much.

Thank you for being here and, until next
time, stay fruity.

[Natalie] Love it.

We did it. We did it!

[Natalie] We did it. Whew!

(laughs)