-
Forget about "good as gold".
Today it's going to get evil.
-
But who or what is evil at all?
-
The devil?
-
The Illuminati?
-
The mother-in-law?
-
Usually evil stands for
morally wrong decisions,
-
a basic power influencing
the history of the world
-
and being the opponent of good.
-
Meaning: where there is light,
there is also shadow.
-
Of course! God against the devil,
the West against the terrorists,
-
Aspirin against a headache ...
-
however, back to
the individual human being.
-
Who actually defines
what is “morally wrong”?
-
Depending on one's ethic position,
definitons differ significantly.
-
According to Bible critic
Benedict de Spinoza, evil is everything
-
that blocks the self-assertion
of an individual.
-
So it's a force from outside
-
that prevents us humans
from developing freely.
-
According to Kant, evil is
an essential part of human nature,
-
since humans are not only
equipped with reason,
-
but also with "empirical",
entirely worldly needs.
-
The inclination to the "dark side"-
-
has thus always been a part of us?
-
His fellow Enlightenment thinker
Rousseau sees things differently.
-
For him, humans are born good.
-
Only living in the community is what
poisons them, makes them evil.
-
So, are we actually born evil,
or is it society that makes us evil?
-
Nietzsche threw all of this overboard,
-
declared "good" to be "bad"
-
and "evil" simply to be
a construct of Christian "slave morality.”
-
Leibniz thoroughly examined evil.
-
He separated it into three categories.
-
That’s the malum physicum:
-
Pain, loss, loneliness, poverty...
-
things you wouldn’t even
wish on your worst enemy.
-
Then Leibniz described
the malum metaphysicum:
-
small imperfections, breaking points
built in by a divine hand.
-
According to Leibniz,
man himself can only be evil in one way -
-
through the malum morale, the moral evil.
-
The sin which you commit,
when you turn away from God.
-
In the 20th century,
existential philosopher Karl Jaspers
-
also divided evil within man
into three categories
-
First: Urges of any kind
-
Second: The lack of the will to do good
-
And third: The will to do evil
-
That is indeed interesting!
-
Haven’t we always been
more fascinated by Darth Vader
-
than by Luke Skywalker
clad in boring eco-linen?!
-
Regardless of your religious or
ideological point of view -
-
"pure" evil: killing, stealing, lying
-
is what is bad for
the individual and society.
-
Yet it seems
that we need evil.
-
Good and evil are
in a dualistic relationship
-
One cannot exist without the other.
-
Otherwise, Ozzy Osborne
would just be a doddering father
-
and every Hollywood film
would begin with the happy-end
-
and plod along without antagonists
-
We need evil as an antithesis.
-
In order to find our way
in the world of ethics.