< Return to Video

The most important lesson from 83,000 brain scans | Daniel Amen | TEDxOrangeCoast

  • 0:07 - 0:13
    In this talk, I'm going to give you
    the single most important lesson
  • 0:13 - 0:19
    my colleagues and I have learned
    from looking at 83,000 brain scans.
  • 0:19 - 0:23
    But first, let me put
    the lesson into context.
  • 0:23 - 0:26
    I am in the middle of seven children.
  • 0:26 - 0:29
    Growing up, my father called me a maverick
  • 0:29 - 0:32
    which to him was not a good thing.
  • 0:32 - 0:34
    (Laughter)
  • 0:34 - 0:37
    In 1972, the army called my number,
  • 0:37 - 0:42
    and I was trained as an infantry medic
    where my love of medicine was born.
  • 0:43 - 0:50
    But since I truly hated the idea
    of being shot at or sleeping in the mud,
  • 0:50 - 0:54
    I got myself retrained
    as an X-ray technician
  • 0:54 - 0:58
    and developed a passion
    for medical imaging.
  • 0:58 - 1:03
    As our professors used to say:
    "How do you know, unless you look?"
  • 1:03 - 1:07
    In 1979, when I was
    a second-year medical student,
  • 1:07 - 1:11
    someone in my family
    became seriously suicidal,
  • 1:12 - 1:15
    and I took her to see
    a wonderful psychiatrist.
  • 1:15 - 1:21
    Over time, I realized
    if he helped her, which he did,
  • 1:21 - 1:24
    it would not only save her life,
  • 1:24 - 1:30
    but it would also help her children
    and even her future grandchildren,
  • 1:30 - 1:36
    as they would be shaped by someone
    who is happier and more stable.
  • 1:37 - 1:39
    I fell in love with psychiatry
  • 1:39 - 1:45
    because I realized it had the potential
    to change generations of people.
  • 1:47 - 1:51
    In 1991, I went to my first lecture
    on brain SPECT imaging.
  • 1:51 - 1:57
    SPECT is a nuclear medicine study
    that looks at the blood flow and activity,
  • 1:57 - 2:00
    it looks at how your brain works.
  • 2:01 - 2:04
    SPECT was presented
    as a tool to help psychiatrists
  • 2:04 - 2:09
    get more information
    to help their patients.
  • 2:10 - 2:13
    In that one lecture,
    my two professional loves,
  • 2:13 - 2:16
    medical imaging and psychiatry,
  • 2:16 - 2:21
    came together, and quite honestly,
    revolutionized my life.
  • 2:21 - 2:25
    Over the next 22 years,
    my colleagues and I would build
  • 2:25 - 2:30
    the world's largest database
    of brain scans related to behavior
  • 2:30 - 2:33
    on patients from 93 countries.
  • 2:34 - 2:38
    SPECT basically tells us
    three things about the brain:
  • 2:38 - 2:41
    good activity, too little, or too much.
  • 2:41 - 2:44
    Here's a set of healthy SPECT scans.
  • 2:44 - 2:48
    The image on the left shows
    the outside surface of the brain,
  • 2:48 - 2:53
    and a healthy scan shows full,
    even, symmetrical activity.
  • 2:53 - 2:58
    The color is not important,
    it's the shape that matters.
  • 2:58 - 3:04
    In the image on the right,
    red equals the areas of high activity,
  • 3:04 - 3:09
    and in a healthy brain, they're typically
    in the back part of the brain.
  • 3:10 - 3:14
    Here's a healthy scan compared
    to someone who had two strokes.
  • 3:14 - 3:17
    You can see the holes of activity.
  • 3:18 - 3:19
    Here's what Alzheimer's looks like,
  • 3:19 - 3:23
    where the back half
    of the brain is deteriorating.
  • 3:23 - 3:28
    Did you know that Alzheimer's disease
    actually starts in the brain
  • 3:28 - 3:33
    30 to 50 years before
    you have any symptoms?
  • 3:34 - 3:37
    Here's a scan
    of a traumatic brain injury.
  • 3:37 - 3:40
    Your brain is soft,
    and your skull is really hard.
  • 3:41 - 3:43
    Or drug abuse.
  • 3:43 - 3:47
    The real reason not to use drugs -
    they damage your brain.
  • 3:48 - 3:50
    Obsessive–compulsive disorder
  • 3:50 - 3:53
    where the front part of the brain
    typically works too hard,
  • 3:54 - 3:57
    so that people cannot
    turn off their thoughts.
  • 3:57 - 4:03
    An epilepsy where we frequently
    see areas of increased activity.
  • 4:04 - 4:09
    In 1992, I went to an all-day conference
    on brain SPECT imaging,
  • 4:09 - 4:12
    it was amazing and mirrored
  • 4:12 - 4:18
    our own early experience
    using SPECT in psychiatry.
  • 4:18 - 4:23
    But at that same meeting,
    researchers started to complain loudly
  • 4:23 - 4:28
    that clinical psychiatrists like me
    should not be doing scans,
  • 4:28 - 4:32
    that they were only for their research.
  • 4:33 - 4:37
    Being the maverick
    and having clinical experience,
  • 4:37 - 4:40
    I thought that was a really dumb idea.
  • 4:40 - 4:42
    (Laughter)
  • 4:42 - 4:44
    Without imaging,
  • 4:44 - 4:50
    psychiatrists then and even now
    make diagnosis like they did in 1840,
  • 4:50 - 4:53
    when Abraham Lincoln was depressed,
  • 4:53 - 4:58
    by talking to people and looking
    for symptom clusters.
  • 4:58 - 5:02
    Imaging was showing us
    there was a better way.
  • 5:02 - 5:07
    Did you know that psychiatrists
    are the only medical specialists
  • 5:07 - 5:10
    that virtually never look
    at the organ they treat?
  • 5:10 - 5:11
    Think about it!
  • 5:12 - 5:17
    Cardiologists look, neurologists look,
    orthopedic doctors look,
  • 5:17 - 5:22
    virtually every other
    medical specialties look -
  • 5:22 - 5:24
    psychiatrists guess.
  • 5:25 - 5:26
    Before imaging,
  • 5:26 - 5:32
    I always felt like I was throwing
    darts in the dark at my patients
  • 5:32 - 5:37
    and had hurt some of them
    which horrified me.
  • 5:38 - 5:39
    There is a reason
  • 5:39 - 5:43
    that most psychiatric medications
    have black box warnings.
  • 5:43 - 5:49
    Give them to the wrong person,
    and you can precipitate a disaster.
  • 5:52 - 5:56
    Early on, our imaging work
    taught us many important lessons,
  • 5:56 - 6:00
    such as illnesses, like ADHD,
    anxiety, depression, and addictions,
  • 6:00 - 6:04
    are not simple or single
    disorders in the brain,
  • 6:04 - 6:07
    they all have multiple types.
  • 6:07 - 6:09
    For example, here are two patients
  • 6:09 - 6:13
    who have been diagnosed
    with major depression,
  • 6:13 - 6:18
    that had virtually the same symptoms,
    yet radically different brains.
  • 6:18 - 6:24
    One had really low activity in the brain,
    the other one had really high activity.
  • 6:25 - 6:31
    How would you ever know what to do
    for them, unless you actually looked?
  • 6:32 - 6:34
    Treatment needs to be tailored
  • 6:34 - 6:39
    to individual brains,
    not clusters of symptoms.
  • 6:40 - 6:42
    Our imaging work also taught us
  • 6:42 - 6:49
    that mild traumatic brain injury
    was a major cause of psychiatric illness
  • 6:49 - 6:51
    that ruin people's lives,
  • 6:51 - 6:56
    and virtually no one knew about it
    because they would see psychiatrists
  • 6:56 - 7:01
    for things like temper problems,
    anxiety, depression, and insomnia,
  • 7:01 - 7:04
    and they would never look,
    so they would never know.
  • 7:05 - 7:08
    Here's a scan of a 15-year-old boy
  • 7:08 - 7:12
    who felt down a flight of stairs
    at the age of three.
  • 7:12 - 7:17
    Even though he was unconscious
    for only a few minutes,
  • 7:19 - 7:25
    there was nothing mild
    about the enduring effect
  • 7:25 - 7:28
    that injury had on this boy's life.
  • 7:28 - 7:32
    When I met him at the age of 15,
    he had just been kicked out
  • 7:32 - 7:37
    of his third residential
    treatment program for violence.
  • 7:37 - 7:40
    He needed a brain rehabilitation program,
  • 7:40 - 7:45
    not just more medication
    thrown at him in the dark,
  • 7:45 - 7:51
    or behavioral therapy which,
    if you think about it, is really cruel.
  • 7:51 - 7:53
    To put him on a behavioral therapy program
  • 7:53 - 7:58
    when behavior is really an expression
    of the problem, it's not the problem.
  • 8:00 - 8:03
    Researchers have found
    that undiagnosed brain injuries
  • 8:03 - 8:08
    are a major cause of homelessness,
    drug and alcohol abuse, depression,
  • 8:08 - 8:12
    panic attacks, ADHD, and suicide.
  • 8:12 - 8:15
    We are in for a pending disaster
  • 8:15 - 8:18
    with the hundreds
    and thousands of soldiers
  • 8:18 - 8:21
    coming back from Iraq and Afganistan,
  • 8:21 - 8:25
    and virtually no one is looking
    at the function of their brain.
  • 8:27 - 8:31
    As we continued our work with SPECT,
  • 8:31 - 8:35
    the criticism grew louder,
    but so did the lessons.
  • 8:36 - 8:41
    Judges and defense attorneys sought
    our help to understand criminal behavior.
  • 8:41 - 8:44
    Today, we have scanned
    over 500 convicted felons
  • 8:44 - 8:46
    including 90 murderers.
  • 8:47 - 8:50
    Our work taught us
    that people who do bad things
  • 8:50 - 8:52
    often have troubled brains.
  • 8:52 - 8:54
    That was not a surprise.
  • 8:54 - 8:57
    But what did surprise us
  • 8:57 - 9:02
    was that many of these brains
    could be rehabilitated.
  • 9:04 - 9:06
    So here's a radical idea.
  • 9:06 - 9:09
    What if we evaluated
    and treated troubled brains
  • 9:09 - 9:14
    rather than simply warehousing them
    in toxic, stressful environments?
  • 9:14 - 9:20
    In my experience, we could save
    tremendous amounts of money
  • 9:20 - 9:23
    by making these people more functional,
  • 9:23 - 9:27
    so when they left prison, they could work,
  • 9:27 - 9:31
    support their families and pay taxes.
  • 9:32 - 9:36
    Dostoyevsky once said:
    "A society should be judged
  • 9:36 - 9:39
    not by how well it treats
    its outstanding citizens,
  • 9:40 - 9:43
    but by how it treats its criminals."
  • 9:43 - 9:47
    Instead of just crime and punishment,
  • 9:47 - 9:54
    we should be thinking
    about crime evaluation and treatment.
  • 9:54 - 9:55
    (Applause)
  • 10:00 - 10:05
    So after 22 years and 83,000 scans,
  • 10:05 - 10:10
    the single most important lesson
    my colleagues and I have learned
  • 10:10 - 10:12
    is that you can literally
    change people's brains.
  • 10:13 - 10:16
    And when you do, you change their life.
  • 10:16 - 10:19
    You are not stuck with the brain you have,
  • 10:19 - 10:22
    you can make it better,
    and we can prove it.
  • 10:23 - 10:27
    My colleagues and I performed
    the first and largest study
  • 10:27 - 10:30
    on active and retired NFL players,
  • 10:30 - 10:34
    showing high levels of damage
    in these players at the time
  • 10:34 - 10:38
    when the NFL said they didn't know
  • 10:38 - 10:41
    if playing football caused
    long-term brain damage.
  • 10:42 - 10:44
    The fact was they didn't want to know.
  • 10:44 - 10:45
    That was not a surprise.
  • 10:45 - 10:48
    I think, if you get the most thoughtful
    9-year-olds together,
  • 10:48 - 10:52
    and you talk about the brain is soft,
    about the consistency of soft butter,
  • 10:52 - 10:56
    it's housed in a really hard skull
    that has many sharp, bony ridges,
  • 10:56 - 11:00
    you know, 28 out of 30
    nine-year-olds would go:
  • 11:00 - 11:02
    "Probably a bad idea for your life."
  • 11:02 - 11:04
    (Laughter)
  • 11:05 - 11:10
    But what really got us excited
    was the second part of the study
  • 11:10 - 11:15
    where we put players
    on a brain-smart program
  • 11:15 - 11:20
    and demonstrated
    that 80% of them could improve
  • 11:20 - 11:24
    in the areas of blood flow,
    memory, and mood,
  • 11:24 - 11:27
    that you are not stuck
    with the brain you have,
  • 11:27 - 11:31
    you can make it better
    on a brain-smart program.
  • 11:31 - 11:33
    How exciting is that?
  • 11:33 - 11:35
    I am so excited.
  • 11:35 - 11:39
    Reversing brain damage
    is a very exciting new frontier,
  • 11:39 - 11:43
    but the implications
    are really much wider.
  • 11:43 - 11:47
    Here is this scan
    of a teenage girl who has ADHD,
  • 11:47 - 11:52
    who was cutting herself, failing
    in school, and fighting with her parents.
  • 11:53 - 11:55
    When we improved her brain,
  • 11:55 - 12:00
    she went from D's and F's to A's and B's,
  • 12:00 - 12:03
    and was much more emotionally stable.
  • 12:03 - 12:05
    Here is the scan of Nancy.
  • 12:05 - 12:09
    Nancy had been diagnosed with dementia,
  • 12:09 - 12:13
    and her doctor told her husband
    that he should find a home for her
  • 12:13 - 12:18
    because within a year,
    she would not know his name.
  • 12:18 - 12:25
    But on an intensive,
    brain-rehabilitation program,
  • 12:26 - 12:30
    Nancy's brain was better,
    as was her memory,
  • 12:30 - 12:36
    and four years later,
    Nancy still knows her husband's name.
  • 12:37 - 12:41
    Or my favorite story
    to illustrate this point: Andrew,
  • 12:41 - 12:45
    a 9-year-old boy who attacked
    a little girl on the baseball field
  • 12:45 - 12:47
    for no particular reason,
  • 12:47 - 12:51
    and at the time,
    was drawing pictures of himself
  • 12:51 - 12:55
    hanging from a tree
    and shooting other children.
  • 12:56 - 13:00
    Andrew was Columbine, Aurora,
  • 13:02 - 13:04
    and Sandy Hook waiting to happen.
  • 13:04 - 13:07
    Most psychiatrists
    would have medicated Andrew,
  • 13:07 - 13:11
    as they did Eric Harris
    and the other mass shooters
  • 13:11 - 13:14
    before they committed their awful crimes,
  • 13:14 - 13:19
    but SPECT imaging taught me
    that I had to look at his brain
  • 13:19 - 13:24
    and not throw darts in the dark at him
    to understand what he needed.
  • 13:24 - 13:30
    His SPECT scan showed
    a cyst, the size of a golf ball,
  • 13:30 - 13:34
    occupying the space
    of his left temple lobe.
  • 13:34 - 13:38
    No amount of medication or therapy
    would have helped Andrew.
  • 13:38 - 13:40
    When the cyst was removed,
  • 13:42 - 13:45
    his behavior completely
    went back to normal,
  • 13:45 - 13:51
    and he became the sweet, loving boy
    he always wanted to be.
  • 13:52 - 13:56
    Now 18 years later,
    Andrew, who is my nephew,
  • 13:57 - 14:01
    owns his own home,
    is employed and pays taxes.
  • 14:01 - 14:03
    (Laughter)
  • 14:03 - 14:07
    Because someone bothered
    to look at his brain,
  • 14:07 - 14:11
    he has been a better son,
  • 14:11 - 14:16
    and will be a better husband,
    father, and grandfather.
  • 14:18 - 14:23
    When you have the privilege
    of changing someone's brain,
  • 14:23 - 14:26
    you not only change his or her life
  • 14:26 - 14:31
    but you have the opportunity
    to change generations to come.
  • 14:32 - 14:34
    I'm Dr. Daniel Amen. Thank you.
  • 14:34 - 14:35
    (Applause)
Title:
The most important lesson from 83,000 brain scans | Daniel Amen | TEDxOrangeCoast
Description:

This talk was given at a local TEDx event, produced independently of the TED Conferences.
In this talk, Dr. Daniel Amen shares the lessons he and his colleagues have learned from looking at 83,000 brain scans. His love for medical imaging and psychiatry has led him from "throwing darts in the dark" to being able address people's problems in a more individual and tailored way. As Daniel says, "treatment needs to be tailored to individual brains, not clusters of symptoms."

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Team:
closed TED
Project:
TEDxTalks
Duration:
14:37
  • Hello!

    There's a little mistake in the subtitle below.

    It says:

    11:09.80
    WERE we put players
    on a brain-smart program

    and it should say:

    11:09.80
    WHERE we put players
    on a brain-smart program

    Thank you,
    Maricene Crus

  • Maybe it's simpler if we use this model:

    11:09: were--->where

English subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions