< Return to Video

How to practice safe sexting

  • Not Synced
    People have been using media to talk
    about sex for a long time.
  • Not Synced
    Love letters, phone sex, racy polaroids.
  • Not Synced
    There's even a story of a girl who eloped
    with a man that she met over the telegraph
  • Not Synced
    in 1886.
  • Not Synced
    Today we have sexting,
    and I am a sexting expert.
  • Not Synced
    Not an expect sexter.
  • Not Synced
    Though, I do know what this means,
    I think you do too.
  • Not Synced
    I have been studying sexting since
    the media attention to it began in 2008.
  • Not Synced
    I wrote a book on the moral
    panic about sexting.
  • Not Synced
    And here's what I found:
  • Not Synced
    most people are worrying
    about the wrong thing.
  • Not Synced
    They're trying to just prevent
    sexting from happening entirely.
  • Not Synced
    But let me ask you this:
  • Not Synced
    As long as it's completely consensual,
    what's the problem with sexting?
  • Not Synced
    People are into all sorts of things
    that you may not be into,
  • Not Synced
    like blue cheese or cilantro.
  • Not Synced
    Sexting is certainly risky,
    like anything that's fun,
  • Not Synced
    but as long as you're not sending an image
    to someone who doesn't want to receive it,
  • Not Synced
    there's no harm.
  • Not Synced
    What I do think is a serious problem is
    when people share private images of others
  • Not Synced
    without their permission.
  • Not Synced
    And instead of worrying about sexting,
    what I think we need to do
  • Not Synced
    is think a lot more about digital privacy.
  • Not Synced
    The key is consent.
  • Not Synced
    Right now most people are thinking
  • Not Synced
    about sexting without really thinking
    about consent at all.
  • Not Synced
    Did you know we currently
    criminalize teen sexting?
  • Not Synced
    It can be a crime because it counts
    as child pornography,
  • Not Synced
    if there's an image of someone under 18
    and it doesn't even matter
  • Not Synced
    if they took that image of themselves
    and shared it willingly.
  • Not Synced
    So we end up with this
    bizarre legal situation
  • Not Synced
    where two 17-year-olds
    can legally have sex in most U.S. states
  • Not Synced
    but they can't photograph it.
  • Not Synced
    Some states have also tried passing
    sexting misdemeanor laws
  • Not Synced
    but these laws repeat the same problem
  • Not Synced
    because they still make
    consensual sexting illegal.
  • Not Synced
    It doesn't make sense
  • Not Synced
    to try to ban all sexting
    to try to address privacy violations.
  • Not Synced
    This is kind of like saying,
  • Not Synced
    let's solve the problem of date rape
    by just making dating completely illegal.
  • Not Synced
    Most teens don't get arrested for sexting,
    but can you guess who does?
  • Not Synced
    It's often teens who are disliked
    by their partner's parent.
  • Not Synced
    And this can be because of class bias,
    racism or homophobia.
  • Not Synced
    Most prosecutors are smart enough
    not to use child pornography charges
  • Not Synced
    against teenagers but some do.
  • Not Synced
    According to researchers
    at the University of New Hampshire
  • Not Synced
    seven percent of all child pornography
    possession arrests are teens,
  • Not Synced
    sexting consensually with other teens.
  • Not Synced
    Child pornography is a serious crime,
  • Not Synced
    but it's just not
    the same thing as teen sexting.
  • Not Synced
    Parents and educators are also
    responding to sexting
  • Not Synced
    without really thinking
    too much about consent.
  • Not Synced
    Their message to teens is often,
    just don't do it.
  • Not Synced
    And I totally get it,
    there are serious legal risks
  • Not Synced
    and of course,
    that potential for privacy violations.
  • Not Synced
    And when you were a teen,
  • Not Synced
    I'm sure you did exactly
    as you were told, right?
  • Not Synced
    You're probably thinking,
    my kid would never sext.
  • Not Synced
    And that's true, your little angel
    may not be sexting
  • Not Synced
    because only 33% of 16 and
    17-year-olds are sexting.
  • Not Synced
    But, sorry, by the time they're older,
    odds are they will be sexting.
  • Not Synced
    Every study I've seen puts the rate
    above 50% for 18 to 24-year-olds.
  • Not Synced
    And most of the time,
    nothing goes wrong.
  • Not Synced
    People ask me all the time things like,
    isn't sexting just so dangerous, though,
  • Not Synced
    like you wouldn't leave your wallet
    on a park bench and you expect
  • Not Synced
    it's gonna get stolen
    if you do that, right?
  • Not Synced
    Here's how I think about it:
  • Not Synced
    sexting is like leaving your wallet
    at your boyfriend's house.
  • Not Synced
    If you come back the next day
  • Not Synced
    and all the money is just gone,
    you really need to dump that guy
  • Not Synced
    So instead of criminalizing sexting to try
    to prevent these privacy violations,
  • Not Synced
    instead we need to make consent central
  • Not Synced
    to how we think about the circulation
    of our private information.
  • Not Synced
    Every new media technology
    raises privacy concerns.
  • Not Synced
    In fact, in the U.S. the very first
    major debates about privacy
  • Not Synced
    were in response to technologies
    that were relatively new at the time.
  • Not Synced
    In the late 1800s, people were
    worried about cameras,
  • Not Synced
    which were just suddenly more portable
    than ever before,
  • Not Synced
    and newspaper gossip columns.
  • Not Synced
    They were worried that the camera
    would capture information about them,
  • Not Synced
    take it out of context
    and widely disseminate it.
  • Not Synced
    Does this sound familiar?
  • Not Synced
    It's exactly what we're worrying about
    now with social media and drone cameras.
  • Not Synced
    and, of course, sexting.
  • Not Synced
    And these fears about technology,
    they make sense because technologies
  • Not Synced
    can amplify and bring out
    our worst qualities and behaviors.
  • Not Synced
    But there are solutions.
  • Not Synced
    And we've been here before
    with a dangerous new technology.
  • Not Synced
    In 1908, Ford introduced the Model T car.
  • Not Synced
    Traffic fatality rates were rising.
  • Not Synced
    It was a serious problem --
    it looks so safe, right?
  • Not Synced
    Our first response was to try
    to change drivers behavior,
  • Not Synced
    so we developed speed limits and
    enforced them through fines.
  • Not Synced
    But over the following decades,
  • Not Synced
    we started to realize the technology
    of the car itself is not just neutral.
  • Not Synced
    We could design the car to make it safer.
  • Not Synced
    So in the 1920s, we got
    shatter-resistant windshields.
  • Not Synced
    In the 1950s, seatbelts.
    And in the 1990s, airbags.
  • Not Synced
    All three of these areas:
  • Not Synced
    laws, individuals, industry
    came together
  • Not Synced
    over time to help solve the problem
    that a new technology causes.
  • Not Synced
    And we can do the same thing with digital privacy. Of course, it comes back to consent. Here's the idea. Before anyone can distribute your private information, they should have to get your permission. This idea of affirmative consent comes from anti-rape activists who tell us that we need consent for every sexual act. And we have really high standards for consent in a lot of other areas. Think about having surgery. Your doctor has to make sure that you are meaningfully and knowingly consenting to that medical procedure. This is not the type of consent with an iTunes Terms of Service where you scroll to the bottom and you're like, agree, agree, whatever. If we think more about consent, we can have better privacy laws. Right now we just don't have that many protections. If your ex-husband or your ex-wife is a terrible person, they can take your nude photos and upload them to a porn site. It can be really hard to get those images taken down. And in a lot of states, you're actually better off if you took the images of yourself because then you can file a copyright claim. RIght now, if someone violates your privacy, whether that's an individual or a company or the NSA, you can try filing a lawsuit, though you may not be successful because many courts assume that digital privacy is just impossible. So they're not willing to punish anyone for violating it. I still hear people asking me all the time, isn't a digital image somehow blurring the line between public and private because it's digital, right? No! No! Everything digital is not just automatically public. That doesn't make any sense. As NYU legal scholar Helen Nissenbaum tells us, we have laws and policies and norms that protect all kinds of information that's private, and it doesn't make difference if it's digital or not. All of your health records are digitized but your doctor can't just share them with anyone. All of your financial information is held in digital databases, but your credit card company can't just post your purchase history online. Better laws could help address privacy violations after they happen, but one of the easiest things we can all do is make personal changes to help protect each other's privacy. We're always told that privacy is our own, sole, individual responsibility. We're told, constantly monitor
Title:
How to practice safe sexting
Speaker:
Amy Adele Hasinoff
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Team:
closed TED
Project:
TEDTalks
Duration:
14:25

English subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions