224 - That All May Be One / Total Onslaught - Walter Veith

http://amazingdiscoveries.tv/media/137/224-that-all-may-be-one/
http://amazingdiscoveries.org/
In an age of religious tolerance and ecumenism, old hatchets are being buried. Churches are reuniting that have long been separated on questions of doctrine. Are these developments based on Scriptures conformity or humanitarian principles? Is truth sacrificed for the sake of unity? Are we moving to an era of peace the Bible warns against? This lecture also looks at the philosophies of some prominent preachers, such as Robert Schuller, Billy Graham, and others. Who leads this ecumenical movement and what is its goal?

That All May Be One

The title of this lecture is
That All May Be One,

and we have dealt in the last few
lectures with the political aspects,

and tonight I want to start
with the religious aspects.

The Vatican II meetings,
Vatican II, the Pope is beeing

carried in during that meeting,
and at that meeting it was

decided that the churches,
the Protestant churches,

may remain in their confessions and
obtain salvation, provided of course,

that they accept and acknowledge
the supremacy of the Bishop of Rome.

Now after Vatican II, it was Karl
Rahner, the Jesuit, strange how

they keep popping up, I know I’m
saying this frequently, but it’s

just a fact. He was the one who was
commissioned to take this message

to the world that everyone could
remain in their confession,

provided they acknowledge the
supremacy of the Bishop of Rome.

And I’ve already dealt with this,
but I’m going to go into a little

bit more detail now, Paul Knitter,
who was held a position at Xavier

University, Cincinnati, where he is
Professor of Theology, he studied

under Karl Rahner, and he wrote
this book, “No Other name?”

And in this book, “No Other Name?”
he writes certain interesting

things, here’s a commentary on it,
it’s interesting that they have a

this little humanist man over there
on the book, tells us its humanism.

He writes, “Faces the conundrum of
what the committed Christian

believer does theologically in face
of the growing evidence, scholarly

and from personal encounter, that
there are other ways, religious

ways, of leading a full, authentic
human life, than the Christian way.”

Are you beginning to see something?
“Can a person be saved,”

definition, “that is, come to live
a truly human life, by some other

name than that of Jesus Christ?”
Hello, let me just recap there, to

be saved means to live a truly
human life, is that correct

theology? This is a professor of
theology, and this book is

virtually prescribed in all
seminaries of theology in the

entire world. “Knitter’s answer is
one can be ‘saved’ by ‘some other

name,’ and then he proceeds to show
how this affirmation can be squared

theologically with a full Christian
commitment. This is first-rate

creative theology” that’s the
only sentence I agree with.

It is creative theology, but it’s
definitely not biblical theology.

Well, at the second ecumenical
council, if the Bible isn’t going

to be the norm, we’ll have to
replace it with something else.

And it was decided in document 515
– of page 515 of the ecumenical

documents that were written at
Vatican II documents.

“Unity of all Christians may at
last be restored and shine forth,

for all peoples are called to be a
single new people, confessing one

Jesus, Savior and Lord, professing
one faith, celebrating one

Eucharistic mystery.” There are
lots of problems with there in this

particular one, particularly the
Eucharistic mystery.

“All Christians should be of an
ecumenical mind,”

Documents of Vatican II. P. 515.
The Catholic Catechism will tell us

that Vatican II did not change
the doctrines; it only appeared to

change the doctrines. This is the
present Catechism of the Catholic

Church, article 816,
“The sole Church of Christ which

our Savior, after his Resurrection,
entrusted to Peter’s pastoral care,

commissioning him and the other
apostles to extend and rule it…

This Church, constituted and
organized as a society in the

present world, subsists in the
Catholic Church… The Second Vatican

Council’s Decree on Ecumenism
explains: “For it is through

Christ’s Catholic Church alone,
which is the universal help towards

salvation, that the fullness of the
means of salvation can be obtained.”

There’s been no change in doctrine,
only Protestants believe that there

has been a change of doctrine.
Wounds to unity, article 817,

“Where there are sins, there
are also divisions, schisms, heresies,”

so if there was a division, then it
was sin, so who’s the sinner?

The one who separated.
Towards unity,

“Christ bestowed unity on his
Church from the beginning”

and this is something the church
can never lose, 820.

It didn’t change. It still governs
– rules the church through its

Supreme Pontiffs and Bishops,
everybody will have to acknowledge

this. This is why
Priest J. Cornell says,

“The final object of ecumenism, as
Catholics conceive it, is unity in

Faith, worship, and the
acknowledgement of supreme

spiritual authority of the Bishop
of Rome.” That’s the bottom line.

“The Church’s bond with
non-Christian religions” –

“all nations form but one community.
” They want the same relations with

Moslems, with all the other
religions. Let’s make sure that

this is true, this was the
Catechism, it can’t be wrong;

Further Questions Answered,
Bonaventure Hinwood OFM,

“Vatican II teaches in several
places that the Catholic Church,

and it alone, is the Church
founded by Jesus Christ” no change

in the Vatican II documentation.
Then September 5, 2000,

the Vatican made this quite clear,
the church’s examined the

Vatican statement, 36 page
statement said other Christians

communities, such as
Anglicans or other Protestants,

“are not churches in the proper
sense.” Canon David Oliver,

minister of St. Thomas’s Anglican
Church, says, oh well, it’s oh,

it’s ok, whatever. “Other Churches
are no sisters of ours, the Vatican

insists” September 5, 2000
“The Independent.”

And remember that Ratzinger said
[Walter Veith said, Karl Rahner said]

“It must be always clear
that the one, holy, catholic

and apostolic universal church is
not the sister, but the mother of

all the churches.” So that’s the
latest statement, definitive

statement, from the highest sources
in the Vatican, Vatican II changed

nothing. These are some of the
comments of the other churches,

“church’s are stunned by Pope’s
attack, Protestant churches express

disappointment, etc.” Nothing
changed, they were still in the

ecumenical movement. The Washington
Post said, “A new Vatican dictum

issued today declares that
individuals can attain full

salvation from earthly sin only
through the spiritual grace of the

Catholic Church and that other
faiths – including Protestant

Christian ones -- have defects that
place their followers in a ‘gravely

deficient situation’.”
And that includes Moslems,

Hindu’s, Jews, everyone;
they have to accept Catholicism as

leader, that’s what the Vatican
teaches. Now how are you going to

this if the Bible so clearly
condemned Catholicism?

Well Vatican II and the Sunday,
again the documents, Vatican II,

“Any endeavor that seeks to make
Sunday a genuine ‘day of joy and

rest from work’ should be encouraged.”
Documents of Vatican II.

We must celebrate the
“Paschal Mystery” it must be the

“primordial feast” day.
There must be freedom from work,

“shall not have precedence over
Sunday,” all feasts are important.

Then it says “the supreme
manifestation of this is the Sunday

assembly.” So again, Vatican II
reiterated that Sunday was the day

that was to be kept. And they
call it the Lord’s day, and in their

Catechism, article 2174, they admit
that “we all gather on the day of

the sun, for it is the first day
[after the Jewish Sabbath]”

there’s no such thing as a Jewish
Sabbath! The Sabbath was instituted

in Eden long before there was a Jew.
Now, Sunday “in Christ’s Passover,

Sunday fulfills the spiritual truth
of the Jewish Sabbath and announces

man’s eternal rest in God.”
And it comes from “tradition”

this all stands in their catechism,
I’m not going to go into the detail.

So now if you’re not going
to have the Bible as basis,

then you better give the people
something else. “Music celebrations”

this is page 83, Vatican
documents, “actively participate

more willingly… format of the
celebration and the degree of

participation in it should be
varies as much as possible.”

“The liturgy,” now the liturgy is
everything that happens in the

church beside the sermon,
“marvelously increases their

(church members) power to preach
Christ” so now let’s put more

emphasis on the liturgy, and
less emphasis on the what?

The preaching.

And they even call it in some
documents the “holy liturgy”.

“A sign lifted up among nation”
and to gather the children that

are “scattered until there
is one fold, one shepherd.”

Of course that has to be the Pope.
How are we going to do this?

This is Vatican II, their documentation,
Documents of Vatican II, quote

“In all popular devotions
the psalms will be especially

useful, and also works of sacred
music drawn from both the old and

the more recent heritage of sacred
music, popular religious songs,

organ, other instruments
characteristic of a particular

people.” (p. 91). “The
participation in the Celebration

should be internal, but
“Must be, on the other hand,

external also… internal
participation by gestures and

bodily attitudes, by the
acclamations, responses and singing.

” In other words, Vatican II says,
“let’s make the service lively,

let’s start moving, let’s have some
bodily attitudes, let’s shake the

arms,” you know; then it’s not so
important whether you have your

Bible, in fact it’s hard to hold
your Bible if your arms are

swinging around like cartwheels.
How must the songs be?

Let’s go again to the Catechism.
Article 1157,

“Song and music fulfill their
function as signs in a manner all

the more significant” that’s fine,
there’s nothing wrong with singing,

singing must be beautiful
and to the glory of God.

But they say that music must
be emotional, quote, Vatican

Catechism, “How I wept, deeply
moved by your hymns, songs and the

voices that echoed through your
Church! What emotion I experienced

in them! Those sounds flowed into
my ears, distilling the truth in my

heart. A feeling of devotion surged
within me, and tears streamed down

my face – tears that did me good.”
So the more tears and the more

emotion, the better; switch the
mind off and switch on something

else. And so the papacy started
using pop groups, and the pope

started singing to ‘Abba’ music,
and all this sort of stuff started

coming into the churches,
which was unknown before.

This is the Pope’s personal little
rock band that goes with him

sometimes when he travels.
These days they have advanced to

the more metal groups and all of
those, and by 1967 the faculty and

students of the Catholic Duquesme
University started become

charismatic. By 1968 the World
Council of Churches had Catholics

as observers, by 1975 there
were observers in Nairobi.

By 1975, a mass gathering took
place at Rome, and Pope Paul the II

actually started speaking in
tongues. Here it is, Christianity

Today, June 6, 1975,
“Bishops, archbishops and

cardinals, struggling to kept heir
hats in place, sang and danced in

ecstasy, embracing one another
raising their arm to heaven – and

Pope Paul VI address was
punctuated with ecstatic.”

So he started speaking in tongues,
great example for the church.

The Lutheran Church by 1974, the
U. S. Lutheran – Roman Catholic Dialog

published its: Papal Primacy and
the Universal Church, they were

beginning to play with the idea
that Rome would again be the head

of the churches. The Presbyterians,
Congregationalists, Methodists,

followed; Colin Buchanin writes
that “The emergence of the church

of Rome as a partner in ecumenical
discussions, and the impact of the

charismatic movement, has totally
changed ecumenical relationships.”

So this new spirit makes the talk
between the various opposing

factions more and more possible.
By 1975 there was a common

Catechism where the moral
directives and the decalogue were

questioned, where many passages in
the New Testament were put in the

mouth of Jesus, things that the
historical Jesus never uttered.

The physical resurrection is a
problem full of difficulties, etc.

etc, starting to question the
Bible. By 1977, there was a joint

Roman Catholic commission which
issued, together with the Anglican

Church, this statement:
“It seems appropriate that in any

future union a universal primacy
such as has been described should

be held by the Roman See.”
So the Anglican Church said,

“Ok, Pope shall be head.”
By 1989 the Anglican Archbishop of

Canterbury, the Revered Robert
Runcy went to Rome and urged

Christians to consider the primacy
of the Pope. Better together.

There they are, and then came the
famous signing of the document

where they actually signed, there
is signing, the Pope and Runcy

signed the declaration at Canterbury,
and the Pope is now the

head of these churches.
And some nice Masonic signals,

yes, they’re going to be
together, and the queen, well;

she and her entourage visit the
Pope and say, well, what did Prince

Charles say? “I do not want to
longer by the protector of the

faith, but just protector of faith.”
So Protestantism goes, and of

course much marching in the
streets of the United Kingdom.

The next Archbishop of Canterbury
is Carey, and Carey is remarkable

because of his charismatic
renewal, and speaking in tongues.

So the Anglican church the
first to go Romward bound.

Now this is the famous St. Paul’s
Cathedral, there it is, a London bus,

I photographed this myself,
and this is a stunning picture,

what do you see?
What does it look like?

It looks like a miniature of the
Vatican, yes, in fact it is a

replica of the Vatican; and
the very amazing thing is that

St. Paul’s Cathedral never looked
like that. Never looked like that,

in fact it used to look like that;
but now it has been totally

rebuilt, and it now looks like that.
Doesn’t this sound remarkably like

an image of the beast?
And image of the beast?

Well let’s go inside.
You have to be very sneaky with

your camera when you go in there.
And, this is what it looks like

now, there’s the min altar;
wow, the main altar is an exact

copy of Bernini’s canopy in Rome.

That means the Protestant
church here has copied Rome.

Very interesting, there are the
black and white squares, they have

cupids with other angelic beings.
Male-females, etc.

and if you look at the ceiling and
you photograph the top, you will

find beautiful Masonic symbols.
This is Masonry, this is not

Church of England, so the Church of
England has capitulated and has

become part of Masonry, and
therefore we could say Luciferian,

sad but true. Well in front of the
main altar there you have the

typical solar symbols.
Looking from the top, it’s like a

witch’s cove, it’s been
restructured; this is occultism.

In fact it even has the black and
white pentagram on the floor.

And on the floor it has the symbol
of the serpent with the tail in the

mouth representing the sun and the
moon, by the way those are my

shoes, they were nice and clean.
And the solar deities on the

floor, so this is nothing other
than Catholicism, here are symbols

of New Age, these are the
peacocks, symbols of Lucifer.

The triangles in the circle, the
hexagrams, and of course the

corpses under the altar, and IHS on
their – and sun blazes on their

utilities, also the mythical
pelican or the bird feeding its

young to its flesh;
these are occult symbols.

No wonder Pope John Paul II could
write in Crossing the Threshold of

Hope, that by the year 2000,
“we need to be more united.”

“For unity, all churches must
accept papal authority.”

The Pope said in 1995.
That’s the condition of unity.

Now why did the Reformation split
from Rome? Surely the Reformation

had good reasons, biblical reason;
Revelation 13:8 said,

“And all that dwell upon the earth
shall worship him, whose names are

not written in the book of life of
the Lamb slain from the foundation

of the world.” Well, they have
surely corrupted that one in the

modern translations, but never
mind that’s what it says;

they shall not be written in the
book of life if they worship this

system by obeying it. Here is the
Dom zu Berlin, this is the Lutheran

Mother church if you like in
Germany, and there they have huge

pictures of Mary with candles
burning in front of it, there you

have it, this is back to Rome, and
the Weltbild published the picture

of Martin Luther shaking hands with
the Pope. Well in the 1980s, the

Pope went to Mainz Germany, and he
said “ecumenism is an urgent task.”

And then “Christians forging
accords for new era… Churches have

a pact” and then the famous synod
in the German, the Lutheran synod:

“Heiβe Eisen und alte Zöpfe”
these old bones of contention if

you like, and they decided
“Der Papst sall nicht

merh…Antichrist genaimnt warden”
the Pope will no longer be called

Antichrist. Well that’s the end of
the Reformation as far as Lutheran

is concerned. Time Magazine
then picked it up and said,

“A half-Millennium Rift: Lutherans
and Catholics reach agreement on

the issues that once split
western Christianity in two.”

And by 1999, November 1,
“churches end 500-year rift”

so the Lutherans acknowledged the
Pope. And this amazing statement:

“Germany calls to ask:
forgive Luther” for what?

For what should he be forgiven?
And the Calvinistic church, they

said “we need to have more respect
for the icons and the things, we

cannot just go together like this.”
“Lutheran leader says Pope might

be global spokesperson for all
Christians. Friday Church News

Notes, July 6, 2001. – Ishmael
Noko, general secretary of the

Lutheran World Fellowship, said in
March that Lutherans

“‘can certainly look to the Pope’
as “one of the spiritual leaders in

the world today.’ He went on to say
that the ecumenical movement

requires Christians to look into
the possibility that the Pope

should become the “global
spokesperson for all Christians.’”

So the Anglicans capitulate,
the Lutherans capitulate,

the Presbyterians capitulate,
the Methodists capitulate, everybody

capitulates. In Germany you have
now churches such as this one which

I find interesting, there’s the
Catholic side, there’s the

Protestant side, and they share the
bell tower. And by the year 2000,

the Knights of Columbus (which of
course is Jesuit controlled)

started sending icons of Our Lady
of Guadalupe to all the churches in

the world. “Nativity of the blessed
Virgin… ‘It’s wonderful’ said Gino

Masotti, grand knight of the
Knights of Columbus Council 11608

at Precious Blood Cathedral”
that he hopes everybody bows down

to the icon. Then came the Joint
Declaration of Lutherans and

Catholics, where they discussed
the doctrine of justification, a

brilliantly written document, which
totally undermines the Protestant

principle. Well, if the Bible goes,
you better get livelier so that

people don’t read the Bible so much.
“Theologen wollen lebendiger

warden” Theologians want to become
livelier, let’s got o church to

have some, you know, some liturgy,
some movement; I don’t know, you

know if you swing your arms, maybe
you can switch the air conditioners

off, I don’t know what the aim
of it all is, but churches forge

together. “But in recent years many
leaders of national churches have

moved from a cautious “No comment”
to the view that the charismatic

movement is the best hope for a
renewal. Professor Hollenweger

said exactly the same thing: he
said, “Catholics and Protestants”

come together because of the
“charismatic movement” which

“has worked miracles.”

“Charismatic wave of unity among
S. A. churches” then the Dutch Reform

church says “The time is more than
ripe to look at what we have in

common and not only at what
separates us.” And all these great

people say exactly the same thing,
the moderators of all these great

churches. By 1990’s the World
Council of Churches was not the

same as it used to be.
Originally the World Council of

Churches was there to talk about
Protestant unity, but of course it

had an agenda to be led towards
Rome. Why is Rome not a member of

the ecumenical movement?
Because it never separated, it’s

the mother, it’s the kiddies that
must come together to go back to

mommy, that’s what’s got to happen.
If Rome became a member of the

ecumenical movement she would
saythat she’s one of the sisters.

She’s not, she’s the mother, so
she cannot be. And at the World

Council of Churches, they said here
“come Holy Spirit… renew the Whole

Creation” was the overall theme.
Now the lady who was in charge of

the main speech at the beginning
was Ms Chung Kyung as she burns a

list of the dead she invoked.
Well she gave the address, she is

now professor at UTS, and she
arrived on the stage dancing with

Aboriginal men, in loincloths, etc.
And then she invoked the dead, she

called up Hagar, Uriah, male
babies killed by Herod, Joan of Arc,

people killed in the gas chambers,
Mahatma Gandhi, Steve Biko, Martin

Luther King, and finally she
also called up the spirit of our

Liberator, Jesus Christ.
And then she burnt the list as a

symbol. Now let’s look
at what happens here.

“Combining verbal fireworks with a
performance by Korean and

aboriginal dancers, Chung rendered
a dramatic evocation of a female

Holy Spirit… she linked [it] to
Hagar… ‘exploited and abandoned by

Abraham and Sarah’… ‘I also know
that I no longer believe in an

omnipotent, Macho, warrior God who
rescues all good guy sand punishes

all bad guys…’ “Eighteen times
Chung summoned the spirits of the

dead who have suffered injustices
and claimed that ‘without hearing

the cries of these spirits, we
cannot hear the voice of the Holy

Spirit… Don’t bother the Spirit by
calling her all the time.’

Added Chung, ‘I hope the presence
of all our ancestors’ spirits here

with us shall not make
you uncomfortable.’”

Well is this biblical, yes or no?
Definitely not, but she is the

minister of the biggest Protestant
church in Korea, and she is now

also Professor at UTS.
Chung Hyun Kung

“… was a graduate of the Union
Theological Seminary.”

Which I’ve already told you is
Masonic, “Chung was ‘a professor of

Korea’s Ewha Women’s University,
the world’s largest university for

women, with 20,000 students’”
She said: “The three goddesses I

want to share with you are Kali
[Hindu], Kwan-in [Buddhist], and

Enna [Philippines]… my new trinity.’
”Interesting, “she added:

‘The Christian church
has been very patriarchal.

That’s why we are here together,
in order to destroy this

patriarchal idolatry
of Christianity.’”

Ok, so that’s the main spokesmen
at most of the World Council of

Church’s meetings. She explains:
“I came from… a Shamanist, Buddhist

and Confucian and Taoist and
Christian tradition… when I look at

our history of religion, we have
more than 5000 years of Shamanism,

more than 2000 years of Taoism, and
almost 2000 years of Buddhism, 700

years of Confucianism and only 100
years of Protestantism in Korea.

Therefore, whenever I go to temples…
and look at Buddha, I feel so young…

Buddha died in his 80s
and Jesus died when he was 33.

Maybe… Jesus should be called
‘Too young to understand.’…

Wow, “I feel like my bowel is Shamanist,
my heart is Buddhist, my right

Brain is Confucianist, and my left
brain is Christian,’ Kyung

continued. ‘I call it a family of
gods and… they are together.’”

So do you see the direction in
which the World Council of Church’s

is moving? Kyung also said:
“We believe that this life-giving

energy came from god and it is
everywhere. It is in the sun, in

the oc-” here we go again, how
nauseating, what is this? Pantheism.

“It is from the ground, and it is
from the trees… If you feel very

tired and you feel you don’t have
any energy to give, what you do is

sit in silence, maybe you go to big
tree and ask… ‘give me some of your

life energy.’ Or you ask the sun to
give you some life energy.”

Well is this Christianity, yes or
no? No this is absolutely not

Christianity. “Kyung was also a
speaker at the World Council of

Churches in Harare, Zimbabwe in
November 1998 where she performed a

sensual dance. Dr. Kyung declared
that to witness about Jesus Christ

to another person is in
reality ‘an act of violence.’

Now let’s get to the hub of the
matter, to witness about Jesus

Christ is an act of violence, why?
Because you are doing what?

You are going against the human
rights of the other individual who

might be a Buddhist or a
Hindu or a this or a that.

He has the right to be what he is,
and if you tell him something else,

‘that you have to believe in Jesus
Christ,’ then you are committing an

act of violence. So in other words,
what I am doing is an act of violence, ok.

“When reminded that Jesus said in
John 14:6 that He is the only way,

Kyung said Jesus ‘was mistaken.’”
Ok, that’s why the World Council

of Churches uses demons and all
kinds of interesting things.

And we have Oikoumene, Oikoumene,
now what does Oikoumene mean?

Here we have an example of Oikoumene.
Well let’s ask the World Council of

Church’s webpage what
Oikoumene actually means.

“The world ‘ecumenical’ is derived
from the Greek term oikoumene,

which may be translated as
‘the whole inhabited world’.

It is in seeing this world as God’s
that we see ourselves as one.

It is in seeing all the world’s
people as made in God’s image

that we are called to protect the
welfare of every one. Interesting.

Now remember that I always show
you that Gary Kahr said the ancient

Babylonian religion through
Kabbalism etc. through to

Freemasonry controls Marxism,
the American Secret Political

Societies, the International Baking,
and the World Council of Churches.

Do you think he might
have been right?

With their teaching, “Jesus
was wrong, he was too young

to understand… we have nature
worship” all of these things, that

is definitely not biblical.
What does - “Alice A. Bailey,

the Foundress of Lucifer
Trust, in 1919” she predicted

“the appearance of ‘a Universal
Church’ of which ‘the definitive

outline will appear toward
the end of the century’…

“There will not be any dissociation
between the Universal Church, the

Sacred Lodge of all true Masons”
see how they’re bringing it

together? “And the inner circles
of the esoteric societies… In this

way, the goals and work of the
United Nations shall be solidified

and a new Church of God, led by all
the religions and by all of the

spiritual groups, shall put an end
to the great heresy of separateness.”

Good, this requires a whole
lecture, this is heavy stuff;

so there’s a lecture coming,
“The UN & the Occult Agenda’ it’s

on your paper, this is very heavy.
She says “the churches, the lodges,”

sacred lodge by the way,
“the esoteric societies”

by the end of the century will
work together to bring about this

New World Religion. Now as a
Christian believing that Jesus is

the only way, can I join
this society, yes or no?

You’re all so adamant, this is
very strange. “Norman Vincent Peale”

now who is Norman Vincent Peale?
Probably one of the greatest

preachers of our times,
“(33rd Degree Freemason):

Freemasonry has always welcomed
men of all faiths and religious beliefs

to enter its doors. The only
requirement is for good men to

believe in the Supreme Architect
and the immortality of the soul.”

None of which is of course biblical.
“Masons, in fact, go beyond narrow

sectarianism and limiting dogma.
They agree with the statement of the

famous statesman and writer
Edmund Burke: ‘The body of all true

religion consists, to be sure,
in obedience to the will of the

Sovereign of the world, in a confidence
in His declarations, and in imitation

of His perfection.’” That’s what Norman
Vincent Peale said who is a 33 degree

Freemason. As is Bishop Carl J. Sanders,
33°, G.C. United Methodist Church.

Rabbi Seymour Atlas, Dr. James
Wesberry, Executive Director

and Editor of Sunday
Georgia Baptist Church.

He’s a 32° Freemason.
Reverend Louis Grant, District

Superintendent The United Methodist
Church, 33° Freemason.

Reverend blah blah blah blah, on
and on and on. Well Norman Vincent

Peale said “I have found…that the
Scottish Rite and the Symbolic

Lodge espouse the belief of no one
religion, but are a respecter of

all major religions of the world.”
And Billy Graham says that Norman

Vincent Peale is his great mentor.
Interesting, he has a 33° mentor.

Billy Graham, World’s most popular
‘Christian’ evangelist is – was

listed on web pages as -
a 33rd degree Freemason.

By themselves, after much
criticism they took them off all

the lists. Shaw was himself a 33°
freemason, revealed that Billy

Graham was at his initiation
ceremony, but in his book,

The Deception, he talks about a
prominent evangelist who attended it,

so that he could get his book
published. Norman Vincent Peale

is a definite 33° Freemason, ex Grand
Chaplain of the Grand Lodge of New

York, this is the one that Billy
Graham said is his mentor.

Robert Schuller, 33° Freemason,
these are webpage sites where you

can look it up, but of course there
are many many writings which

confirm this, so this is not the
only source; I’m just quoting from

the sources. Oral Roberts, Jesse
Jackson, most of the early founding

Mormons, we know that;
Jehovah’s witness, we know all

that. Peale, let’s have a look at
Norman Vincent Peale, endorsed the

channeled messages
called the “Jesus Letters”,

written by Jane Palzere and Anna
Brown. So he endorsed channeled

letters. “The amazing holy letters
where written on each day over a
t

wo-year period that began on a
morning in 1978.

She said the letters were dictated
by a ‘nonliving spirit’ who

identified Himself through
her pen as Jesus Christ.”

There’s the quote: …Peale’s response…
He adds: “it little matters if these

writings came from Jesus of Nazareth
or Jesus of Jane, they are

all the same consciousness
and that consciousness is God.

I am part of God and Jane and
Anna are part of that same God.”

Right, that’s what Norman Vincent
Peale taught, this is the mentor of

Billy Graham. Interesting.
…speaking of occultist Kreskin…

“All he’s doing” says
Norman Vincent Peale

“is dramatizing what I’ve been
preaching in my writing for years.”

Another book, The Dead Are Alive!
They Can and Do Communicate with

You, was also promoted by Peale.
He gushed: “A masterpiece!...

I hope it will be widely read.”
Ok, this is the mentor of Billy

Graham, just remember that.
“The book’s author is Harold

Sherman, a psychic and spirit
medium who also wrote a companion

book, You live after death.”

Pope John Paul II visit the Jewish
Synagogue by 1986, ’87

he tours the US, meets with
Protestants and Orthodox, ‘88-’89:

Russia opens the door to the
charismatic movement, and so

they’re all coming together
in one big happy family.

The Southern Cross,
the Catholic Newspaper write,

“Israel’s chief rabbi pays visit to
Pope” The patriarch of course of

the Orthodox church and the Pope
also meet with much Masonic

signaling going over there.
“Israel invites the Pope to visit

the Holy Land” and the Pope
honors Shindler’s widow.

This is the Rabbi, Robert Jacobs, let’s
here what he has to say on this issue.

“And in 1965 Vatican II changed that,”

“Jacob says the second Vatican
council marked an historic turn

around for Catholic Jewish
relations. And he says John Paul II

has done extraordinary things to
show respect for Judaism.

He was the first Pope to visit a
synagogue.”

Jacobs:
“No Pope in Roman history had ever

done, has ever done, what he has
done. It gives all Jews a feeling

that for the first time in Christian
church history, Judaism

is appreciated as having its own
integrity, and is not demeaned.

I think it’s a tremendous privilege
to meet this extraordinary Pope.”

Veith: And then when the Pope
visited St. Louis, this is what he

had to say. Jacob: “We rejoice and
blossom, they will blossom with

abundant flowers and
rejoice with joyful song.”

Veith: That’s interesting, well here
is Aleksy, the Russian patriarch,

and there he is with Cardinal Cassidy,
and they have much more freedom;

this is a signal picture
by the way, Oikoumene,

the Pope and the patriarch together.

And we have a revival of Eastern
Orthodoxy. Occultism is revived,

Asian religions are revived, Islam,
Buddhism, Hinduism, Shintoism,

Sokka Gakkai, and Spiritism.
In the world there is a revival of

religion and religious fervor and
conflict is on the increase, have

you noticed that? Yes, now why?
Because through chaos and

conflict, you will bring them
together, make the pain of

separation greater than the
pain of union. Thesis, antithesis,

synthesis is the Hegelian
philosophy. “Great expectations”

the patriarch of Constantinople
says, “we will join the churches”.

Then the opening of the Islamic
Cultural Centre in Rome, Catholic

Bishops residing; Pope John Paul
greets them, Islam and Catholicism,

we’ve dealt with it in a whole
lecture, coming together.

The problem is how to bring
Judaism, Islam, Christianity all

together. These are documents from
the Catholic Academy of Trier, note

what they are using over here, what
is the symbolism they are using

with all these strange
symbols on their documents?

Same over here, pentagrams, all
the religious symbols in a circle,

papal seminary; what is this
structure here with the mystic taos

around it, what does it mean, the
emblem of the centenary of the

Catholic Church in Cameroon.
Well these are Kalyant’s and

Mandala’s that they are using,
these are symbols of Eastern

Religions symbolizing unity of all
the churches. Pope and the Dalai

Lama together, and it is
interesting that we need to study

what the Protestant world has to
say on this issue as well, and I

would like to show you the great
Protestant preachers and what they

are actually preaching, now Robert
Schuller is listed on many many

webpages as a 33 degree Freemason.
Well the proof of the pudding of course

is always in the eating. He wrote here
in The Fourth Dimension, Foreword,

“I discovered the reality of that
dynamic dimension in prayer that

comes through visualizing…
Don’t try to understand it.

Just start to enjoy it!
It’s true. It works. I tried it.”

Now visualizing is the way in
which you start visualizing

something and it becomes part of
your fantasy world, they train

little kids to do this, this is
occult technique, it’s occultism.

Here is his famous cathedral, the
crystal palace, there he is, this

great preacher; by the way he took
the plans of this cathedral and he

took them to Rome in order to have
them blessed by the Pope.

That’s very interesting that
Robert Schuller should take these

to the Pope to have them blessed.
His son is now obviously taking

over the ministry as he
gets a little bit older.

Robert Schuller: Quotes from
Self-Esteem: The New Reformation,

he writes, “Classical theology has
erred in its insistence that

theology be ‘God-centered,’
not ‘man-centered’” (p. 64).

That’s very interesting, that’s
spoken like a true Freemason,

wouldn’t you agree?
Yes, on p. 153 he writes

“One classical role of the pulpit
in Protestantism has been to

‘preach sermons’ – oh - which imply
indoctrination more than education.

Within this form of communication,
there is an inherent, intrinsic

inclination to intimidate,
manipulate, and, hence, offend the

person’s most prized quality
of humanness – his dignity”

Well that sounds like Vatican II,
let’s move to liturgy, let’s have

all these wonderful things other
than the preaching of the word.

He writes on page 14,
“Sin is any act or thought that

robs myself or another human
being of his or her self-esteem”

that’s interesting because
I thought the Bible said,

“sin is the transgression of the
law,” isn’t it right?

He writes on page 26-27
“What we need is a theology of

salvation that begins and ends with
a recognition of every person’s

hunger for glory” Oh, I thought
that justification is something

that actually lays man’s glory in
the dust, that’s what I thought, it

makes Jesus Christ more, and me
less; isn’t that what the Bible

teaches? “He must increase,
I must decrease” wow, p. 68

“To be born again means that we
must be changed from a negative to

a positive self-image – from
inferiority to self-esteem, from

fear to love, from doubt to trust”.
Very interesting theology.

Page 75 “The Cross sanctifies the
ego trip. For the Cross protected

our Lord’s perfect self-esteem
from turning into sinful pride.”

Now that is just plain blasphemy
as far as I’m concerned. Page 135

“Christ is the Ideal One, for he
was Self-Esteem Incarnate”.

I thought he came to
show humility, didn’t he?

My Bible says he was humble.
“Jesus never called a person a

sinner. … Rather he reserved his
righteous rebuke for those who used

their religious authority to generate
guilt and caused people to

lose their ability to taste and
enjoy their right to dignity…”

Interesting. I thought he said
“I have not called the righteous,

but sinners to repentance”
didn’t he say that?

So this man is obviously using
some strange document,

I don’t know which Bible he uses.
He says “… the church’s problem is

that it had a God-centered theology
for centuries, when it needs a

man-centered one; (2) we’re not
bad, merely badly informed about

how good we are;” oh, Robert
Schuller, that’s a fascinating

statement! “It would be an insult
to the integrity of any human being

to call him a sinner;”
I thought when he comes, the Holy

Spirit, he will convict us of sin
and righteousness and judgment.

“Jesus knew His wroth;
His success fed His self-esteem.

He suffered the cross to sanctify
His self-esteem and He bore the

cross to sanctify your self-esteem.
The cross will sanctify the ego trip”.

Isn’t this pathetic?
This man is not a Christian,

he’s a Mason. Now, remember when
I say Mason, I mean high Mason,

because the poor lower grades of
Masons know nothing about all of this;

high Mason, let me qualify.
[Schuller further amplified this

latter thought on the 8/12/80 Phil
Donahue Show; Schuller said,

“Jesus had an ego. He said,
‘I, if I be lifted up, will draw all

men unto me.’ Wow, what an ego trip
He was on!”] That’s disgusting.

Questioner, this is a questioner
to Schuller: “How could the cross,

as you write, “sanctify the ego
trip,” and make us proud, in the

light of passages that say,
“I hate pride and arrogance (Prov. 8:13),

“Pride goes before
destruction” (Prov. 16:18),

“The Lord detests all the proud”
(Prov. 16:5), “Do not be proud”

(Rom. 12:16), “Love does not
boast, it is not proud” (1 Cor. 13:4).

In fact Paul warns Timothy
that in the last days men

“will be lovers of themselves”
(2 Tim. 3:2). …”

Good questioner, I like the
questioner already,

“Why should we do anything to
encourage people to become

“lovers of themselves” if Paul
in fact warned others that

that would be the state of
godlessness in the last days?”

Schuller: “I hope you don't [preach
this] because you could do a lot of

damage to a lot of beautiful people.
… if you preach that text, oh man,

I sure hop you give it the kind of
interpretation that I do, or I’ll

tell you, you’ll drive them farther
away and they’ll be madder than

hell at you and they’ll turn the
Bible off, and they’ll switch you

off, and they’ll turn on the
rock music and Madonna.

Just because it’s in the Bible
doesn’t mean you should preach it.

… it is so difficult to preach
some of those texts and not come

across as lacking humility…” 11/92 radio
interview with Robert Schuller Rapidnet.com.

See how these people turn it round?

Robert Schuller: “… what sets me apart
from fundamentalists [is that they] are

trying to convert everybody to believe
how they believe. … We know the things

the major faiths can agree on.
We try to focus on those without

offending those with different view-points. …”
(3/23/89, USA Today). There’s the quote,

USA Today. -Schuller said:
“When we know we have been redeemed

and we know we are part of God’s
family, we are ready to dream that

great divine dream of building the
kingdom of God in the world.”

Now the Kingdom of God
I thought was not of this world,

didn’t you think so as well?
Robert Schuller said after his

thousandth telecast, when he was
congratulated by Mother Theresa,

she was still alive there;
Billy Graham congratulated him,

S. Scott King, Martin Luther [King],
all the living presidents of the

United States as well as Sammy
Davis Junior – who was a Satanist.

They all congratulated him.
“What we need is to positivise the

words that have only had a negative
connotation. There is no greater

damage that can be done than to
refer to the lost sinful condition

of man.” Let me tell you something,
if man doesn’t realize that he is

in a lost sinful condition, then he
will never need a savior, and then

he will be lost. “I don’t think
anything has been done in the name

of Christ that and under the banner
of Christianity that has proven

more destructive to human
personality and, hence,

counterproductive to the evangelism
enterprise than the often crude,

uncouth, and unchristian strategy
of attempting to make people aware

of their lost and sinful condition.”
(Time, March 18, 1985).

Wow, that’s disgusting.
Well he goes further than that,

let’s have a look at what he really
consists of. “The most effective

mantras employ the “M” sound.
You can get the feel of it by

repeating the words,
“I am, I am” many times over….

Transcendental Meditation or TM…
is not a religion nor is it

necessarily anti-Christian.”
(Peace of Mind Through Possibility

Thinking, pp. 131-32).
Wow, you can chant

“I am, I am, I am”? What
do you think about that?

Now you’re saying I’m God, surely
you don’t mean that mister

Schuller, do you? Methodist,
Anglican, all of them come

together, they all begin to
believe in life after death.

Well here in self-esteem the new
Reformation, Robert Schuller

writes, “To be born again means
that we must be changed from a

negative to a positive self-image –
from inferiority to self esteem,

from fear to love, from doubt to
trust. ……. And we can pray,”

Note what mister Schuller says,
Dr. Schuller, sorry, ‘Our Father in

heaven, honorable is our name
[emphasis in the original].”

What is Robert Schuller saying?
He’s saying he is God.

Is this biblical or is it demonic
theology, you tell me, you choose;

it’s demonic. Who approves of his
theology, who likes his theology?

There it says, “Discover Your
Possibilities” Robert Schuller,

Positive, inspirational
guidelines, who endorces it?

“Dr. Schuller has an amazing ministry,”
Dr. Billy Graham.

Birds of a feather flock together.
Who is Billy Graham?

Here he is, one of the greatest
preachers of our time, Christian in

Winter, here he is with Nixon,
“When you went into the ministry.

Politics lost one of its
potentially greatest practitioners.”

Remember that Nixon had a Jesuit
speech writer? Do you remember that?

We showed you those quotes.
And, you know if everybody loves

you in the world, well;
it gets kind of scary.

Here he is at Madison Square
Gardens, here he is at the U.S.

Capital during the presentation of
the Congressional Gold Medal that

he received with Al Gore sitting
there. “On receiving honorary

doctorate from the Roman Catholic
Belmont College, said the:

“gospel that founded this college
is the same gospel which I preach

today.” Hello, Billy Graham, I
thought you were a Protestant!

Why are you teaching Catholicism?
And please tell me, why in all

your campaigns, do you have a team
of 800 Catholic nuns and Jesuit

priests and all kinds of people
like that? And why after your

campaign do you channel them to the
Catholic priests to be incorporated

into Catholicism? Why do you do
that if you are a Protestant?

“The Religious News Services
reported on January 13, 1981,

“Pope John Paul II was closeted
for almost two hours with the

Rev. Billy Graham, the world’s
best-known Protestant evangelist.”

Religious news service, there it
is, there he is together with him,

“the Pope is almost an evangelist”
and here he is dressed in black,

and the Pope dressed
in white, talking together.

It was through Billy Graham’s
intervention that former President

Ronald Reagan set up an
ambassador to the Vatican.

Against the Constitution of the
United States. He has been the

linking agent from the White House
to Rome. Graham wrote, this is his

own words, speaking for himself:
“Reagan was the first American

President to appoint a full
ambassador to the Vatican.

Before he made the appointment, he
asked my view. I told him I thought

it would probably be a good thing –
in spite of a number of potential

problems concerning the separation
of church and state – and wrote an

extended confidential letter
outlining my reasons.

Among other things, I told him I
did not think it necessarily

violated the separation of church
and state. For whatever reasons,

Mr. Reagan went ahead with the plan.
Later my letter was leaked to the press.

It caused some consternation
among my Baptist friends.”

Yes, of course it would cause a
consternation, but his Baptist

friends might not know what he his,
because it is so well covered up in

the world. If you want to read more
about him, read Billy Graham and

His Friends, “Robert Schuller’s
1986 Possibilities magazine had

Templeton’s photo on the cover.
‘The lead article Templeton that

‘nothing exists except God’ (that’s
pantheism) and that ‘the Christ

spirit dwells in every human being
whether the person knows it or not’

(that’s universalism).”
Templeton, now who received the

Templeton prize? Of course Billy
Graham, “Graham told Schuller

during an interview: ‘… whether they
come from the Muslim world, or

the Buddhist world, or the
Christian world, they are members

of the Body of Christ, because
they’ve been called by God.’”

Yes, you can be a member of the
body of Christ in any of those

religions if you unknowingly do
what the law requires because your

conscious dictates this, and God
overlooks the ignorance of those

who do not know. “The ignorance God
winks at” but, if you know the law

and you do it not, you will die, if
you don’t know the law and you

still break the law, you will also
die; that means eternally.

So Evangelicals and Catholics
join forces eventually.

And Pope John Paul II is decried
as the Superstar of the world.

“Pope deserves title of
first citizen of the world.”

Newsweek October 15, 1979.
He said that in ’79 already.

After September 11, ecumenism
received a tremendous boost.

All the religions stated coming
together, the Moslem’s and the

Protestant’s and the Catholics,
they were all praying together.

Death O’ Protestantism Foreseen.
By 1997, the Episcopal church,

with its bishop here, had the
following to say, Bishop Adler,

“the world of the Lord told us that
what we are witnessing is the end

of an era, that God is restoring
His temple and that there would be

a priesthood, an Episcopacy that
was an apostolic succession – a

main difference between
Protestant and Catholicism.”

Now this is this church, this is –
basically the high church of

England in the United States.
Bishop Adler said

“that after the sermon, he ‘stood
up to give a prophetic word’ but

fell on the floor and wept for 45
minutes.’ Then, he said, ‘We all

sensed what God was saying to us –
We were witnessing the end of

Protestantism.’” And then he said
“‘God’s church is Catholic!’

he declared. ‘It was Catholic in
the beginning, and it will be

Catholic in the end.” “Churches
agree Pope has overall authority”

isn’t that interesting? The Pope
wrote this and he said in

his Crossing the Threshold of Hope
that by the year 2000 we will need

to be more united. 1999, June: They
wrote, “The Pope was recognized as

the overall authority
in the Christian world”

in the Christian world entirely!
“By an Anglican and Roman Catholic

commission yesterday
which described him as a

“gift to be received by all the
Churches”. Interesting, and then he

has The Gift of Authority,
“the 45-page document, The Gift of

Authority, has been produced by the
18-member Anglican-Roman Catholic

International Commission…” and it
“concluded that the Bishop of Rome

had a ‘specific ministry concerning
the discernment of truth’”

what does that mean? That he’s
infallible, so the Protestant world

has given up Protestantism.
“Churches ‘should hold seances’”

yes, who said that? This was the
Anglican Church in England, now

we’re ready for spiritism in the
church, the churches are really

falling! Falling! These are no
longer prophetic words, these are

false prophetic words,
these are false prophets.

They are preaching a lie.
And in the next lecture it will

become abundantly clear what is
happening – don’t miss the next

lecture, Strange Fire.
We’ll see some videos which will

be astounding. So, he said, what
this Anglican priest said is that

we can actually talk to the deceased,
and maybe we can reach

the atheists who died from the
other side, and convince them now

that you see there after all, you
don’t have to be an atheist anymore.

If that theology was true,
couldn’t God do it?

The Roman Catholic Controversy,
James R. White, he’s a writer who

says that “Today, well,
are we coming together?

There are many reasons
why we should stay separate”

he sees the problems.
The Council of Trent said,

“to check unbridled spirits, it
decrees that no one relying on his

own judgment shall, in matters of
faith and morals pertaining to the

edification of Christian doctrine,
distorting the Holy Scriptures in

accordance with his own
conceptions, presume to interpret

them contrary to that sense which
holy mother Church, to whom it

belongs to judge of their true
sense and interpretation, has held

and holds,” so only the church may
tell you what to believe, you’re

goyim, you’re too stupid to
understand it yourself. Interesting.

The papacy, has it changed?
No, “refinement of evil”

where the Pope outlines that every
single ancient doctrine held by

Rome will be held. Therefore can I
be part of the ecumenical movement,

yes or no? I cannot be, because I
cannot accept this as my spiritual

leader. I have one leader and his
name happens to be Jesus Christ.

He’s the only leader I have, and I
have one creed, and that creed

happens to be the Bible and the
Bible alone. That’s my creed,

otherwise I have no standard
whatsoever. “Keeper of the Straight

and Narrow” there’s Cardinal
Ratzinger, German-born Cardinal

Joseph Ratzinger, head of the
“Congregation for Doctrine and

Faith.” They make sure that every
ancient Catholic doctrine remains

and that no Protestant even
recognizes it, they’re so sneaky.

Here is Cardinal Küng, and these
people Hans Küng, all they want to

do is bring about ecumenism.
So they make lots of Protestant

noises, didn’t the Jesuits say that
“if you want to win someone, make

his noises,” yes or no?
Yes, don’t trust them one little bit.

By 1986 we had the Council of
Assisi and all the religions of the

world were present. That included
Islam, Hinduism, all these

religions; they all came together
at Assisi, there’s the Pope, there

are the patriarchs, there’s Runcy,
there’s the Dalai Lama, Hinduism,

Buddhism, every single thing was
present, where? At Assisi.

Do you know what’s interesting?
After the Council of Assisi there

came an earthquake, and
the whole Cathedral collapsed,

it’s almost like God said “gyt bmph”
guess what they did, they

instantly rebuilt it to its former
glory; instantly, immediately it

stands as an icon to Assisi, and
that this Assisi meeting in ’86,

the first rot started of accepting
the papacy as the ultimate.

By 1999 this is what happened,
United Nations of Faith moved

Mountains. Article appeared in a
Belgian national newspaper “Le Soir”,

dated 30th August 2000.
“A general rehearsal is taking

place at the highest level, in a
forum where the Supreme Being,

grand architect, - that’s Masonic
language - or watchmaker of the

universe, if he exists at all –
they’re derogatory – is to

recognize his own…” at a time when
the United Nations will shortly

host the summit of the millennium,
with the presence of the heads of

state of the entire world, all the
world’s religious leaders have been

gathering in New York”
how much of the world’s religious

leaders? All “to discuss the most
important theme of world peace and

tolerance.” “The more distant
object: to create a kind of United

Nations of Faith”.
“Where the representatives of faith

and philosophies could meet
and in order to discuss the future

together, whilst abandoning their
fatwas, theses, and other terrible

arms of excommunication and
exclusion and relegating them to

the cloak room.” Let’s get away
from our separateness, let’s come

together. “This is a very noble
‘ecumenical initiative’,”

sponsored by whom? “Ted Turner,”
A 33 degree Freemason, who hates

Christianity, who funded the
initiative. He is vice-president of

Time Warner, founder of CNN. And
“for every sin there is grace: ten

years ago, the flamboyant boss
of instantaneous television

had declared that Christianity was
nothing but an affair for ‘losers

and freaks’…” Ok, so he still
believes it, now why would Ted

Turner finance something like that?
Because he says Jane Fonda, his

wife turned Christian, and that
changed his mind? I don’t think so.

I think it’s because he’s a 33
degree Freemason, and they have an

agenda. Well, “2000 representatives
of very well, or less known

religions, the ones which are
practiced the world over, or which

are almost an affair of confidence,
only known in the corridors of the

UN, or the spiffing Waldorf Astoria
hotel, which will be used for the

subsequent meetings and work.
The pope sent the African cardinal

Francis Arzine, president of the
pontifical council for interfaith

dialogue, representing the Jewish
faith was the Chief Rabbi Lau of

Jerusalem, the Buddhists were
deprived of the presence of the

Dalai Lama. This shows that
religion is never far removed from

politics: China threatened to
boycott the meeting if he went.”

That’s just a game they’re playing.

Well, the initiative,
“Bishop Desmond Tutu”

said, let’s go ahead with it, and
“in the US and in particular in

circles of the UN, the “first”
initiative has been very welcomed.

Nevertheless, one needs to
render to Caesar, or rather to

John-Paul II, his dues. It is indeed
thanks to him that the way of

reconciliation was
started at Assisi in 1985.”

Culminating in that meeting in 1986.
Well the Pope then May 2001

visited the famous Mosque in
Damascus, “John Paul II made

history on Sunday by becoming
the first Pontiff ever to enter a

mosque, and urged Christians and
Muslims to forgive each other.”

That’s the mosque,
remember I showed it to you;

the famous mosque in Damascus,
and we walked through it.

And, we look at this amazing
structure with these people having

the same rituals as in Roman
Catholicism, and you will remember

that we spoke about the head of
John the Baptist that is stored in

this mosque. So it’s significant
that the Pope went to that

particular mosque to go
and seek reconciliation.

Although reconciliation is just a
word for the goyim, the outside;

the inside has always been
reconciled. And we know already

that the pope then kissed the Koran.
So the initiative is to bring all

the religions, this is a symbol of
the religions dancing together, a

symbol of Judaism, and Buddhism,
and Christianity, and Hinduism and

all of them coming together in a
one great big happy family.

This is the title page of Rotarian
Bishop Lehman’s document for

“World Peace Day” and the emblem of
the “World Conference of Religions.”

Hinduism, Buddhism, and
finally we have a parliament

of world religions; now this
parliament of world religions is an

outcome of the Assisi meeting,
and this was their Africa day;

they have the sun symbol in the
middle, there are interesting

symbols in this. So at this
interfaith meeting in 1999,

“as reported the Associated Press,
with the Dalai Lama, sitting by his

right side, this October [1999]”
there was another meeting

“in Rome the Pope presided at
a special council of some 2000

religious leaders of various
faiths, sects, and cults.”

Now I’m going to show you a video of
that in a moment of what happened there.

“The Pontiff told the assembled
Buddhist monks, Zoroastrian

priests, Catholic cardinals, Hindu
gurus, American Indian shamen,

Jewish rabbis, and ecumenical
clergy” that’s all the Protestants

that there are, “that all must join
in condemning” who?

“The Christian fundamentalists”
wow, I thought the problems were

elsewhere, but he obviously has an
inside tact so he knows who the

real problem people are.
It’s the Christian fundamentalists, why?

Because they commit the ultimate
crime of telling people about who?

Jesus.

Don’t you think there’s a total
onslaught on Jesus Christ?

I believe there is.

“Christian fundamentalists who
‘abuse speech’ and whose efforts at

converting others ‘incite
hatred and violence.’”

Didn’t Miss Kyung say the
same thing, yes or no?

She said the same thing at the
World Council of Churches.

So we want unity, but please let
this unity be on a universal

Christ, just leave Jesus out of this.
This is an attack on Jesus Christ.

“All present were in accord
on two key points: (1) Pope John

Paul II was endorsed by consensus
as the planet’s chief spiritual

guide and overseer;” that’s
interesting. “And (2) Religious

fundamentalists who refuse to go
along with the global ecumenical

movement” that would include me
for example, “are to be silenced.”

So who knows how many times
you can still hear this message,

“they must be denounced as
‘dangerous extremists full of hate.’”

(True bible believers denounced
at Papal Conference.

Power of Prophecy (March 2000, Vol.
2000-03, p. 3).

That’s why we have hate laws,
you’re not supposed to preach this

message, you’re not supposed to
preach that Jesus Christ is Lord,

then you are a dangerous extremist
full of hate. Well I figured I better

preach it before we
can no longer preach it.

And that’s why I’m here to tell
you about these things.

The onslaught is not against me,
the onslaught is against the Lord.

And he predicted that
this was going to happen.

Well let’s have a look at this
Masonic meeting, you will see three

candles in this meeting, that’s
Masonic. They light the solar

candles, which are little covered
candles, which are used in Hinduism

for example as solar candles, and
in Buddhism and in Eastern

mysticism. And you will see that
they use all kinds of music, just

like the Bible said. In fact the
main rock band of Italy gave the

background music at the ceremony on
the one stage with the papacy on

the other stage. And ever religious
leader of note in the world was

there of every religion to bow down
and give homage to the pope.

Interesting, let’s watch it.

He looks so smug doesn’t he?

Well here they all are, Islam,
Hinduism, Buddhism, Shintuism,

Soca Gaya, all of them,
Protestantism, all of them bowing

down acknowledging the pope.
Now didn’t the Bible say that the

whole world would wonder after him,
yes or no? And that she would not

suffer loss of children,
didn’t the Bible say that?

Judaism was there, all
the religions were there.

Now this means that we are very
very close to the close of time.

This is an interesting picture
that was published once by Der

Spiegel, Der Spiegel, and here you
have a statue of Caesar showing a

finger; that’s actually a Masonic thing,
but never mind there he does it.

Then you have Mussolini on the
other side giving the finger.

And then they have Rom here,
“Der Papst, Die Kirche Und Die

Sunde” the Pope, the Church, and
the Sin, and they have the Pope

over there in full sun worship
regalia; and then they have the

prostitute. It’s almost like they
know something right?

This prostitute, the Bible says,
is the woman that rides the beast,

the great prostituted that is over
the nations; and all the kings of

the world give their power unto the
beast. We’ve seen that the ruling

powers in the world actually come
from very few families today,

highly occult families. “And the
woman which thou sawest is

that great city, which reigneth
over the kings of the earth.”

Revelation 17:18. “And I heard
another voice from heaven, saying,

Come out of her, my people that ye
be not partakers of her sins, and

that ye receive not of her plagues.”
Revelations 18:4.

What do you think they have
planned for those who harbor a

spirit of separateness?
What do you think they have

planned for those who say,
who say, like the Bible says:

“Come out and be separate
that you receive not her plagues,”

so that you don’t take part in her
sins. What do you think will be

their conclusion about such a
matter? I think this is a very very

serious issue, and we’re going to
have lectures on this when we get

there. We’ll see what their final
plans are, and who they actually

pinpoint as opposition, that would
be interesting, don’t you think?

We’ll let them speak for themselves,
in the meantime as for

me and my house, I cannot join this
ecumenical council, and I would

like to uplift Jesus Christ to you
tonight as the only Savior on this

world and follow the biblical
way and none will be lost.

That is his promise, why not
take him at his word? Amen.