That All May Be One
The title of this lecture is That All May Be One,
and we have dealt in the last few lectures with the political aspects,
and tonight I want to start with the religious aspects.
The Vatican II meetings, Vatican II, the Pope is beeing
carried in during that meeting, and at that meeting it was
decided that the churches, the Protestant churches,
may remain in their confessions and obtain salvation, provided of course,
that they accept and acknowledge the supremacy of the Bishop of Rome.
Now after Vatican II, it was Karl Rahner, the Jesuit, strange how
they keep popping up, I know I’m saying this frequently, but it’s
just a fact. He was the one who was commissioned to take this message
to the world that everyone could remain in their confession,
provided they acknowledge the supremacy of the Bishop of Rome.
And I’ve already dealt with this, but I’m going to go into a little
bit more detail now, Paul Knitter, who was held a position at Xavier
University, Cincinnati, where he is Professor of Theology, he studied
under Karl Rahner, and he wrote this book, “No Other name?”
And in this book, “No Other Name?” he writes certain interesting
things, here’s a commentary on it, it’s interesting that they have a
this little humanist man over there on the book, tells us its humanism.
He writes, “Faces the conundrum of what the committed Christian
believer does theologically in face of the growing evidence, scholarly
and from personal encounter, that there are other ways, religious
ways, of leading a full, authentic human life, than the Christian way.”
Are you beginning to see something? “Can a person be saved,”
definition, “that is, come to live a truly human life, by some other
name than that of Jesus Christ?” Hello, let me just recap there, to
be saved means to live a truly human life, is that correct
theology? This is a professor of theology, and this book is
virtually prescribed in all seminaries of theology in the
entire world. “Knitter’s answer is one can be ‘saved’ by ‘some other
name,’ and then he proceeds to show how this affirmation can be squared
theologically with a full Christian commitment. This is first-rate
creative theology” that’s the only sentence I agree with.
It is creative theology, but it’s definitely not biblical theology.
Well, at the second ecumenical council, if the Bible isn’t going
to be the norm, we’ll have to replace it with something else.
And it was decided in document 515 – of page 515 of the ecumenical
documents that were written at Vatican II documents.
“Unity of all Christians may at last be restored and shine forth,
for all peoples are called to be a single new people, confessing one
Jesus, Savior and Lord, professing one faith, celebrating one
Eucharistic mystery.” There are lots of problems with there in this
particular one, particularly the Eucharistic mystery.
“All Christians should be of an ecumenical mind,”
Documents of Vatican II. P. 515. The Catholic Catechism will tell us
that Vatican II did not change the doctrines; it only appeared to
change the doctrines. This is the present Catechism of the Catholic
Church, article 816, “The sole Church of Christ which
our Savior, after his Resurrection, entrusted to Peter’s pastoral care,
commissioning him and the other apostles to extend and rule it…
This Church, constituted and organized as a society in the
present world, subsists in the Catholic Church… The Second Vatican
Council’s Decree on Ecumenism explains: “For it is through
Christ’s Catholic Church alone, which is the universal help towards
salvation, that the fullness of the means of salvation can be obtained.”
There’s been no change in doctrine, only Protestants believe that there
has been a change of doctrine. Wounds to unity, article 817,
“Where there are sins, there are also divisions, schisms, heresies,”
so if there was a division, then it was sin, so who’s the sinner?
The one who separated. Towards unity,
“Christ bestowed unity on his Church from the beginning”
and this is something the church can never lose, 820.
It didn’t change. It still governs – rules the church through its
Supreme Pontiffs and Bishops, everybody will have to acknowledge
this. This is why Priest J. Cornell says,
“The final object of ecumenism, as Catholics conceive it, is unity in
Faith, worship, and the acknowledgement of supreme
spiritual authority of the Bishop of Rome.” That’s the bottom line.
“The Church’s bond with non-Christian religions” –
“all nations form but one community. ” They want the same relations with
Moslems, with all the other religions. Let’s make sure that
this is true, this was the Catechism, it can’t be wrong;
Further Questions Answered, Bonaventure Hinwood OFM,
“Vatican II teaches in several places that the Catholic Church,
and it alone, is the Church founded by Jesus Christ” no change
in the Vatican II documentation. Then September 5, 2000,
the Vatican made this quite clear, the church’s examined the
Vatican statement, 36 page statement said other Christians
communities, such as Anglicans or other Protestants,
“are not churches in the proper sense.” Canon David Oliver,
minister of St. Thomas’s Anglican Church, says, oh well, it’s oh,
it’s ok, whatever. “Other Churches are no sisters of ours, the Vatican
insists” September 5, 2000 “The Independent.”
And remember that Ratzinger said [Walter Veith said, Karl Rahner said]
“It must be always clear that the one, holy, catholic
and apostolic universal church is not the sister, but the mother of
all the churches.” So that’s the latest statement, definitive
statement, from the highest sources in the Vatican, Vatican II changed
nothing. These are some of the comments of the other churches,
“church’s are stunned by Pope’s attack, Protestant churches express
disappointment, etc.” Nothing changed, they were still in the
ecumenical movement. The Washington Post said, “A new Vatican dictum
issued today declares that individuals can attain full
salvation from earthly sin only through the spiritual grace of the
Catholic Church and that other faiths – including Protestant
Christian ones -- have defects that place their followers in a ‘gravely
deficient situation’.” And that includes Moslems,
Hindu’s, Jews, everyone; they have to accept Catholicism as
leader, that’s what the Vatican teaches. Now how are you going to
this if the Bible so clearly condemned Catholicism?
Well Vatican II and the Sunday, again the documents, Vatican II,
“Any endeavor that seeks to make Sunday a genuine ‘day of joy and
rest from work’ should be encouraged.” Documents of Vatican II.
We must celebrate the “Paschal Mystery” it must be the
“primordial feast” day. There must be freedom from work,
“shall not have precedence over Sunday,” all feasts are important.
Then it says “the supreme manifestation of this is the Sunday
assembly.” So again, Vatican II reiterated that Sunday was the day
that was to be kept. And they call it the Lord’s day, and in their
Catechism, article 2174, they admit that “we all gather on the day of
the sun, for it is the first day [after the Jewish Sabbath]”
there’s no such thing as a Jewish Sabbath! The Sabbath was instituted
in Eden long before there was a Jew. Now, Sunday “in Christ’s Passover,
Sunday fulfills the spiritual truth of the Jewish Sabbath and announces
man’s eternal rest in God.” And it comes from “tradition”
this all stands in their catechism, I’m not going to go into the detail.
So now if you’re not going to have the Bible as basis,
then you better give the people something else. “Music celebrations”
this is page 83, Vatican documents, “actively participate
more willingly… format of the celebration and the degree of
participation in it should be varies as much as possible.”
“The liturgy,” now the liturgy is everything that happens in the
church beside the sermon, “marvelously increases their
(church members) power to preach Christ” so now let’s put more
emphasis on the liturgy, and less emphasis on the what?
The preaching.
And they even call it in some documents the “holy liturgy”.
“A sign lifted up among nation” and to gather the children that
are “scattered until there is one fold, one shepherd.”
Of course that has to be the Pope. How are we going to do this?
This is Vatican II, their documentation, Documents of Vatican II, quote
“In all popular devotions the psalms will be especially
useful, and also works of sacred music drawn from both the old and
the more recent heritage of sacred music, popular religious songs,
organ, other instruments characteristic of a particular
people.” (p. 91). “The participation in the Celebration
should be internal, but “Must be, on the other hand,
external also… internal participation by gestures and
bodily attitudes, by the acclamations, responses and singing.
” In other words, Vatican II says, “let’s make the service lively,
let’s start moving, let’s have some bodily attitudes, let’s shake the
arms,” you know; then it’s not so important whether you have your
Bible, in fact it’s hard to hold your Bible if your arms are
swinging around like cartwheels. How must the songs be?
Let’s go again to the Catechism. Article 1157,
“Song and music fulfill their function as signs in a manner all
the more significant” that’s fine, there’s nothing wrong with singing,
singing must be beautiful and to the glory of God.
But they say that music must be emotional, quote, Vatican
Catechism, “How I wept, deeply moved by your hymns, songs and the
voices that echoed through your Church! What emotion I experienced
in them! Those sounds flowed into my ears, distilling the truth in my
heart. A feeling of devotion surged within me, and tears streamed down
my face – tears that did me good.” So the more tears and the more
emotion, the better; switch the mind off and switch on something
else. And so the papacy started using pop groups, and the pope
started singing to ‘Abba’ music, and all this sort of stuff started
coming into the churches, which was unknown before.
This is the Pope’s personal little rock band that goes with him
sometimes when he travels. These days they have advanced to
the more metal groups and all of those, and by 1967 the faculty and
students of the Catholic Duquesme University started become
charismatic. By 1968 the World Council of Churches had Catholics
as observers, by 1975 there were observers in Nairobi.
By 1975, a mass gathering took place at Rome, and Pope Paul the II
actually started speaking in tongues. Here it is, Christianity
Today, June 6, 1975, “Bishops, archbishops and
cardinals, struggling to kept heir hats in place, sang and danced in
ecstasy, embracing one another raising their arm to heaven – and
Pope Paul VI address was punctuated with ecstatic.”
So he started speaking in tongues, great example for the church.
The Lutheran Church by 1974, the U. S. Lutheran – Roman Catholic Dialog
published its: Papal Primacy and the Universal Church, they were
beginning to play with the idea that Rome would again be the head
of the churches. The Presbyterians, Congregationalists, Methodists,
followed; Colin Buchanin writes that “The emergence of the church
of Rome as a partner in ecumenical discussions, and the impact of the
charismatic movement, has totally changed ecumenical relationships.”
So this new spirit makes the talk between the various opposing
factions more and more possible. By 1975 there was a common
Catechism where the moral directives and the decalogue were
questioned, where many passages in the New Testament were put in the
mouth of Jesus, things that the historical Jesus never uttered.
The physical resurrection is a problem full of difficulties, etc.
etc, starting to question the Bible. By 1977, there was a joint
Roman Catholic commission which issued, together with the Anglican
Church, this statement: “It seems appropriate that in any
future union a universal primacy such as has been described should
be held by the Roman See.” So the Anglican Church said,
“Ok, Pope shall be head.” By 1989 the Anglican Archbishop of
Canterbury, the Revered Robert Runcy went to Rome and urged
Christians to consider the primacy of the Pope. Better together.
There they are, and then came the famous signing of the document
where they actually signed, there is signing, the Pope and Runcy
signed the declaration at Canterbury, and the Pope is now the
head of these churches. And some nice Masonic signals,
yes, they’re going to be together, and the queen, well;
she and her entourage visit the Pope and say, well, what did Prince
Charles say? “I do not want to longer by the protector of the
faith, but just protector of faith.” So Protestantism goes, and of
course much marching in the streets of the United Kingdom.
The next Archbishop of Canterbury is Carey, and Carey is remarkable
because of his charismatic renewal, and speaking in tongues.
So the Anglican church the first to go Romward bound.
Now this is the famous St. Paul’s Cathedral, there it is, a London bus,
I photographed this myself, and this is a stunning picture,
what do you see? What does it look like?
It looks like a miniature of the Vatican, yes, in fact it is a
replica of the Vatican; and the very amazing thing is that
St. Paul’s Cathedral never looked like that. Never looked like that,
in fact it used to look like that; but now it has been totally
rebuilt, and it now looks like that. Doesn’t this sound remarkably like
an image of the beast? And image of the beast?
Well let’s go inside. You have to be very sneaky with
your camera when you go in there. And, this is what it looks like
now, there’s the min altar; wow, the main altar is an exact
copy of Bernini’s canopy in Rome.
That means the Protestant church here has copied Rome.
Very interesting, there are the black and white squares, they have
cupids with other angelic beings. Male-females, etc.
and if you look at the ceiling and you photograph the top, you will
find beautiful Masonic symbols. This is Masonry, this is not
Church of England, so the Church of England has capitulated and has
become part of Masonry, and therefore we could say Luciferian,
sad but true. Well in front of the main altar there you have the
typical solar symbols. Looking from the top, it’s like a
witch’s cove, it’s been restructured; this is occultism.
In fact it even has the black and white pentagram on the floor.
And on the floor it has the symbol of the serpent with the tail in the
mouth representing the sun and the moon, by the way those are my
shoes, they were nice and clean. And the solar deities on the
floor, so this is nothing other than Catholicism, here are symbols
of New Age, these are the peacocks, symbols of Lucifer.
The triangles in the circle, the hexagrams, and of course the
corpses under the altar, and IHS on their – and sun blazes on their
utilities, also the mythical pelican or the bird feeding its
young to its flesh; these are occult symbols.
No wonder Pope John Paul II could write in Crossing the Threshold of
Hope, that by the year 2000, “we need to be more united.”
“For unity, all churches must accept papal authority.”
The Pope said in 1995. That’s the condition of unity.
Now why did the Reformation split from Rome? Surely the Reformation
had good reasons, biblical reason; Revelation 13:8 said,
“And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are
not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation
of the world.” Well, they have surely corrupted that one in the
modern translations, but never mind that’s what it says;
they shall not be written in the book of life if they worship this
system by obeying it. Here is the Dom zu Berlin, this is the Lutheran
Mother church if you like in Germany, and there they have huge
pictures of Mary with candles burning in front of it, there you
have it, this is back to Rome, and the Weltbild published the picture
of Martin Luther shaking hands with the Pope. Well in the 1980s, the
Pope went to Mainz Germany, and he said “ecumenism is an urgent task.”
And then “Christians forging accords for new era… Churches have
a pact” and then the famous synod in the German, the Lutheran synod:
“Heiβe Eisen und alte Zöpfe” these old bones of contention if
you like, and they decided “Der Papst sall nicht
merh…Antichrist genaimnt warden” the Pope will no longer be called
Antichrist. Well that’s the end of the Reformation as far as Lutheran
is concerned. Time Magazine then picked it up and said,
“A half-Millennium Rift: Lutherans and Catholics reach agreement on
the issues that once split western Christianity in two.”
And by 1999, November 1, “churches end 500-year rift”
so the Lutherans acknowledged the Pope. And this amazing statement:
“Germany calls to ask: forgive Luther” for what?
For what should he be forgiven? And the Calvinistic church, they
said “we need to have more respect for the icons and the things, we
cannot just go together like this.” “Lutheran leader says Pope might
be global spokesperson for all Christians. Friday Church News
Notes, July 6, 2001. – Ishmael Noko, general secretary of the
Lutheran World Fellowship, said in March that Lutherans
“‘can certainly look to the Pope’ as “one of the spiritual leaders in
the world today.’ He went on to say that the ecumenical movement
requires Christians to look into the possibility that the Pope
should become the “global spokesperson for all Christians.’”
So the Anglicans capitulate, the Lutherans capitulate,
the Presbyterians capitulate, the Methodists capitulate, everybody
capitulates. In Germany you have now churches such as this one which
I find interesting, there’s the Catholic side, there’s the
Protestant side, and they share the bell tower. And by the year 2000,
the Knights of Columbus (which of course is Jesuit controlled)
started sending icons of Our Lady of Guadalupe to all the churches in
the world. “Nativity of the blessed Virgin… ‘It’s wonderful’ said Gino
Masotti, grand knight of the Knights of Columbus Council 11608
at Precious Blood Cathedral” that he hopes everybody bows down
to the icon. Then came the Joint Declaration of Lutherans and
Catholics, where they discussed the doctrine of justification, a
brilliantly written document, which totally undermines the Protestant
principle. Well, if the Bible goes, you better get livelier so that
people don’t read the Bible so much. “Theologen wollen lebendiger
warden” Theologians want to become livelier, let’s got o church to
have some, you know, some liturgy, some movement; I don’t know, you
know if you swing your arms, maybe you can switch the air conditioners
off, I don’t know what the aim of it all is, but churches forge
together. “But in recent years many leaders of national churches have
moved from a cautious “No comment” to the view that the charismatic
movement is the best hope for a renewal. Professor Hollenweger
said exactly the same thing: he said, “Catholics and Protestants”
come together because of the “charismatic movement” which
“has worked miracles.”
“Charismatic wave of unity among S. A. churches” then the Dutch Reform
church says “The time is more than ripe to look at what we have in
common and not only at what separates us.” And all these great
people say exactly the same thing, the moderators of all these great
churches. By 1990’s the World Council of Churches was not the
same as it used to be. Originally the World Council of
Churches was there to talk about Protestant unity, but of course it
had an agenda to be led towards Rome. Why is Rome not a member of
the ecumenical movement? Because it never separated, it’s
the mother, it’s the kiddies that must come together to go back to
mommy, that’s what’s got to happen. If Rome became a member of the
ecumenical movement she would saythat she’s one of the sisters.
She’s not, she’s the mother, so she cannot be. And at the World
Council of Churches, they said here “come Holy Spirit… renew the Whole
Creation” was the overall theme. Now the lady who was in charge of
the main speech at the beginning was Ms Chung Kyung as she burns a
list of the dead she invoked. Well she gave the address, she is
now professor at UTS, and she arrived on the stage dancing with
Aboriginal men, in loincloths, etc. And then she invoked the dead, she
called up Hagar, Uriah, male babies killed by Herod, Joan of Arc,
people killed in the gas chambers, Mahatma Gandhi, Steve Biko, Martin
Luther King, and finally she also called up the spirit of our
Liberator, Jesus Christ. And then she burnt the list as a
symbol. Now let’s look at what happens here.
“Combining verbal fireworks with a performance by Korean and
aboriginal dancers, Chung rendered a dramatic evocation of a female
Holy Spirit… she linked [it] to Hagar… ‘exploited and abandoned by
Abraham and Sarah’… ‘I also know that I no longer believe in an
omnipotent, Macho, warrior God who rescues all good guy sand punishes
all bad guys…’ “Eighteen times Chung summoned the spirits of the
dead who have suffered injustices and claimed that ‘without hearing
the cries of these spirits, we cannot hear the voice of the Holy
Spirit… Don’t bother the Spirit by calling her all the time.’
Added Chung, ‘I hope the presence of all our ancestors’ spirits here
with us shall not make you uncomfortable.’”
Well is this biblical, yes or no? Definitely not, but she is the
minister of the biggest Protestant church in Korea, and she is now
also Professor at UTS. Chung Hyun Kung
“… was a graduate of the Union Theological Seminary.”
Which I’ve already told you is Masonic, “Chung was ‘a professor of
Korea’s Ewha Women’s University, the world’s largest university for
women, with 20,000 students’” She said: “The three goddesses I
want to share with you are Kali [Hindu], Kwan-in [Buddhist], and
Enna [Philippines]… my new trinity.’ ”Interesting, “she added:
‘The Christian church has been very patriarchal.
That’s why we are here together, in order to destroy this
patriarchal idolatry of Christianity.’”
Ok, so that’s the main spokesmen at most of the World Council of
Church’s meetings. She explains: “I came from… a Shamanist, Buddhist
and Confucian and Taoist and Christian tradition… when I look at
our history of religion, we have more than 5000 years of Shamanism,
more than 2000 years of Taoism, and almost 2000 years of Buddhism, 700
years of Confucianism and only 100 years of Protestantism in Korea.
Therefore, whenever I go to temples… and look at Buddha, I feel so young…
Buddha died in his 80s and Jesus died when he was 33.
Maybe… Jesus should be called ‘Too young to understand.’…
Wow, “I feel like my bowel is Shamanist, my heart is Buddhist, my right
Brain is Confucianist, and my left brain is Christian,’ Kyung
continued. ‘I call it a family of gods and… they are together.’”
So do you see the direction in which the World Council of Church’s
is moving? Kyung also said: “We believe that this life-giving
energy came from god and it is everywhere. It is in the sun, in
the oc-” here we go again, how nauseating, what is this? Pantheism.
“It is from the ground, and it is from the trees… If you feel very
tired and you feel you don’t have any energy to give, what you do is
sit in silence, maybe you go to big tree and ask… ‘give me some of your
life energy.’ Or you ask the sun to give you some life energy.”
Well is this Christianity, yes or no? No this is absolutely not
Christianity. “Kyung was also a speaker at the World Council of
Churches in Harare, Zimbabwe in November 1998 where she performed a
sensual dance. Dr. Kyung declared that to witness about Jesus Christ
to another person is in reality ‘an act of violence.’
Now let’s get to the hub of the matter, to witness about Jesus
Christ is an act of violence, why? Because you are doing what?
You are going against the human rights of the other individual who
might be a Buddhist or a Hindu or a this or a that.
He has the right to be what he is, and if you tell him something else,
‘that you have to believe in Jesus Christ,’ then you are committing an
act of violence. So in other words, what I am doing is an act of violence, ok.
“When reminded that Jesus said in John 14:6 that He is the only way,
Kyung said Jesus ‘was mistaken.’” Ok, that’s why the World Council
of Churches uses demons and all kinds of interesting things.
And we have Oikoumene, Oikoumene, now what does Oikoumene mean?
Here we have an example of Oikoumene. Well let’s ask the World Council of
Church’s webpage what Oikoumene actually means.
“The world ‘ecumenical’ is derived from the Greek term oikoumene,
which may be translated as ‘the whole inhabited world’.
It is in seeing this world as God’s that we see ourselves as one.
It is in seeing all the world’s people as made in God’s image
that we are called to protect the welfare of every one. Interesting.
Now remember that I always show you that Gary Kahr said the ancient
Babylonian religion through Kabbalism etc. through to
Freemasonry controls Marxism, the American Secret Political
Societies, the International Baking, and the World Council of Churches.
Do you think he might have been right?
With their teaching, “Jesus was wrong, he was too young
to understand… we have nature worship” all of these things, that
is definitely not biblical. What does - “Alice A. Bailey,
the Foundress of Lucifer Trust, in 1919” she predicted
“the appearance of ‘a Universal Church’ of which ‘the definitive
outline will appear toward the end of the century’…
“There will not be any dissociation between the Universal Church, the
Sacred Lodge of all true Masons” see how they’re bringing it
together? “And the inner circles of the esoteric societies… In this
way, the goals and work of the United Nations shall be solidified
and a new Church of God, led by all the religions and by all of the
spiritual groups, shall put an end to the great heresy of separateness.”
Good, this requires a whole lecture, this is heavy stuff;
so there’s a lecture coming, “The UN & the Occult Agenda’ it’s
on your paper, this is very heavy. She says “the churches, the lodges,”
sacred lodge by the way, “the esoteric societies”
by the end of the century will work together to bring about this
New World Religion. Now as a Christian believing that Jesus is
the only way, can I join this society, yes or no?
You’re all so adamant, this is very strange. “Norman Vincent Peale”
now who is Norman Vincent Peale? Probably one of the greatest
preachers of our times, “(33rd Degree Freemason):
Freemasonry has always welcomed men of all faiths and religious beliefs
to enter its doors. The only requirement is for good men to
believe in the Supreme Architect and the immortality of the soul.”
None of which is of course biblical. “Masons, in fact, go beyond narrow
sectarianism and limiting dogma. They agree with the statement of the
famous statesman and writer Edmund Burke: ‘The body of all true
religion consists, to be sure, in obedience to the will of the
Sovereign of the world, in a confidence in His declarations, and in imitation
of His perfection.’” That’s what Norman Vincent Peale said who is a 33 degree
Freemason. As is Bishop Carl J. Sanders, 33°, G.C. United Methodist Church.
Rabbi Seymour Atlas, Dr. James Wesberry, Executive Director
and Editor of Sunday Georgia Baptist Church.
He’s a 32° Freemason. Reverend Louis Grant, District
Superintendent The United Methodist Church, 33° Freemason.
Reverend blah blah blah blah, on and on and on. Well Norman Vincent
Peale said “I have found…that the Scottish Rite and the Symbolic
Lodge espouse the belief of no one religion, but are a respecter of
all major religions of the world.” And Billy Graham says that Norman
Vincent Peale is his great mentor. Interesting, he has a 33° mentor.
Billy Graham, World’s most popular ‘Christian’ evangelist is – was
listed on web pages as - a 33rd degree Freemason.
By themselves, after much criticism they took them off all
the lists. Shaw was himself a 33° freemason, revealed that Billy
Graham was at his initiation ceremony, but in his book,
The Deception, he talks about a prominent evangelist who attended it,
so that he could get his book published. Norman Vincent Peale
is a definite 33° Freemason, ex Grand Chaplain of the Grand Lodge of New
York, this is the one that Billy Graham said is his mentor.
Robert Schuller, 33° Freemason, these are webpage sites where you
can look it up, but of course there are many many writings which
confirm this, so this is not the only source; I’m just quoting from
the sources. Oral Roberts, Jesse Jackson, most of the early founding
Mormons, we know that; Jehovah’s witness, we know all
that. Peale, let’s have a look at Norman Vincent Peale, endorsed the
channeled messages called the “Jesus Letters”,
written by Jane Palzere and Anna Brown. So he endorsed channeled
letters. “The amazing holy letters where written on each day over a t
wo-year period that began on a morning in 1978.
She said the letters were dictated by a ‘nonliving spirit’ who
identified Himself through her pen as Jesus Christ.”
There’s the quote: …Peale’s response… He adds: “it little matters if these
writings came from Jesus of Nazareth or Jesus of Jane, they are
all the same consciousness and that consciousness is God.
I am part of God and Jane and Anna are part of that same God.”
Right, that’s what Norman Vincent Peale taught, this is the mentor of
Billy Graham. Interesting. …speaking of occultist Kreskin…
“All he’s doing” says Norman Vincent Peale
“is dramatizing what I’ve been preaching in my writing for years.”
Another book, The Dead Are Alive! They Can and Do Communicate with
You, was also promoted by Peale. He gushed: “A masterpiece!...
I hope it will be widely read.” Ok, this is the mentor of Billy
Graham, just remember that. “The book’s author is Harold
Sherman, a psychic and spirit medium who also wrote a companion
book, You live after death.”
Pope John Paul II visit the Jewish Synagogue by 1986, ’87
he tours the US, meets with Protestants and Orthodox, ‘88-’89:
Russia opens the door to the charismatic movement, and so
they’re all coming together in one big happy family.
The Southern Cross, the Catholic Newspaper write,
“Israel’s chief rabbi pays visit to Pope” The patriarch of course of
the Orthodox church and the Pope also meet with much Masonic
signaling going over there. “Israel invites the Pope to visit
the Holy Land” and the Pope honors Shindler’s widow.
This is the Rabbi, Robert Jacobs, let’s here what he has to say on this issue.
“And in 1965 Vatican II changed that,”
“Jacob says the second Vatican council marked an historic turn
around for Catholic Jewish relations. And he says John Paul II
has done extraordinary things to show respect for Judaism.
He was the first Pope to visit a synagogue.”
Jacobs: “No Pope in Roman history had ever
done, has ever done, what he has done. It gives all Jews a feeling
that for the first time in Christian church history, Judaism
is appreciated as having its own integrity, and is not demeaned.
I think it’s a tremendous privilege to meet this extraordinary Pope.”
Veith: And then when the Pope visited St. Louis, this is what he
had to say. Jacob: “We rejoice and blossom, they will blossom with
abundant flowers and rejoice with joyful song.”
Veith: That’s interesting, well here is Aleksy, the Russian patriarch,
and there he is with Cardinal Cassidy, and they have much more freedom;
this is a signal picture by the way, Oikoumene,
the Pope and the patriarch together.
And we have a revival of Eastern Orthodoxy. Occultism is revived,
Asian religions are revived, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Shintoism,
Sokka Gakkai, and Spiritism. In the world there is a revival of
religion and religious fervor and conflict is on the increase, have
you noticed that? Yes, now why? Because through chaos and
conflict, you will bring them together, make the pain of
separation greater than the pain of union. Thesis, antithesis,
synthesis is the Hegelian philosophy. “Great expectations”
the patriarch of Constantinople says, “we will join the churches”.
Then the opening of the Islamic Cultural Centre in Rome, Catholic
Bishops residing; Pope John Paul greets them, Islam and Catholicism,
we’ve dealt with it in a whole lecture, coming together.
The problem is how to bring Judaism, Islam, Christianity all
together. These are documents from the Catholic Academy of Trier, note
what they are using over here, what is the symbolism they are using
with all these strange symbols on their documents?
Same over here, pentagrams, all the religious symbols in a circle,
papal seminary; what is this structure here with the mystic taos
around it, what does it mean, the emblem of the centenary of the
Catholic Church in Cameroon. Well these are Kalyant’s and
Mandala’s that they are using, these are symbols of Eastern
Religions symbolizing unity of all the churches. Pope and the Dalai
Lama together, and it is interesting that we need to study
what the Protestant world has to say on this issue as well, and I
would like to show you the great Protestant preachers and what they
are actually preaching, now Robert Schuller is listed on many many
webpages as a 33 degree Freemason. Well the proof of the pudding of course
is always in the eating. He wrote here in The Fourth Dimension, Foreword,
“I discovered the reality of that dynamic dimension in prayer that
comes through visualizing… Don’t try to understand it.
Just start to enjoy it! It’s true. It works. I tried it.”
Now visualizing is the way in which you start visualizing
something and it becomes part of your fantasy world, they train
little kids to do this, this is occult technique, it’s occultism.
Here is his famous cathedral, the crystal palace, there he is, this
great preacher; by the way he took the plans of this cathedral and he
took them to Rome in order to have them blessed by the Pope.
That’s very interesting that Robert Schuller should take these
to the Pope to have them blessed. His son is now obviously taking
over the ministry as he gets a little bit older.
Robert Schuller: Quotes from Self-Esteem: The New Reformation,
he writes, “Classical theology has erred in its insistence that
theology be ‘God-centered,’ not ‘man-centered’” (p. 64).
That’s very interesting, that’s spoken like a true Freemason,
wouldn’t you agree? Yes, on p. 153 he writes
“One classical role of the pulpit in Protestantism has been to
‘preach sermons’ – oh - which imply indoctrination more than education.
Within this form of communication, there is an inherent, intrinsic
inclination to intimidate, manipulate, and, hence, offend the
person’s most prized quality of humanness – his dignity”
Well that sounds like Vatican II, let’s move to liturgy, let’s have
all these wonderful things other than the preaching of the word.
He writes on page 14, “Sin is any act or thought that
robs myself or another human being of his or her self-esteem”
that’s interesting because I thought the Bible said,
“sin is the transgression of the law,” isn’t it right?
He writes on page 26-27 “What we need is a theology of
salvation that begins and ends with a recognition of every person’s
hunger for glory” Oh, I thought that justification is something
that actually lays man’s glory in the dust, that’s what I thought, it
makes Jesus Christ more, and me less; isn’t that what the Bible
teaches? “He must increase, I must decrease” wow, p. 68
“To be born again means that we must be changed from a negative to
a positive self-image – from inferiority to self-esteem, from
fear to love, from doubt to trust”. Very interesting theology.
Page 75 “The Cross sanctifies the ego trip. For the Cross protected
our Lord’s perfect self-esteem from turning into sinful pride.”
Now that is just plain blasphemy as far as I’m concerned. Page 135
“Christ is the Ideal One, for he was Self-Esteem Incarnate”.
I thought he came to show humility, didn’t he?
My Bible says he was humble. “Jesus never called a person a
sinner. … Rather he reserved his righteous rebuke for those who used
their religious authority to generate guilt and caused people to
lose their ability to taste and enjoy their right to dignity…”
Interesting. I thought he said “I have not called the righteous,
but sinners to repentance” didn’t he say that?
So this man is obviously using some strange document,
I don’t know which Bible he uses. He says “… the church’s problem is
that it had a God-centered theology for centuries, when it needs a
man-centered one; (2) we’re not bad, merely badly informed about
how good we are;” oh, Robert Schuller, that’s a fascinating
statement! “It would be an insult to the integrity of any human being
to call him a sinner;” I thought when he comes, the Holy
Spirit, he will convict us of sin and righteousness and judgment.
“Jesus knew His wroth; His success fed His self-esteem.
He suffered the cross to sanctify His self-esteem and He bore the
cross to sanctify your self-esteem. The cross will sanctify the ego trip”.
Isn’t this pathetic? This man is not a Christian,
he’s a Mason. Now, remember when I say Mason, I mean high Mason,
because the poor lower grades of Masons know nothing about all of this;
high Mason, let me qualify. [Schuller further amplified this
latter thought on the 8/12/80 Phil Donahue Show; Schuller said,
“Jesus had an ego. He said, ‘I, if I be lifted up, will draw all
men unto me.’ Wow, what an ego trip He was on!”] That’s disgusting.
Questioner, this is a questioner to Schuller: “How could the cross,
as you write, “sanctify the ego trip,” and make us proud, in the
light of passages that say, “I hate pride and arrogance (Prov. 8:13),
“Pride goes before destruction” (Prov. 16:18),
“The Lord detests all the proud” (Prov. 16:5), “Do not be proud”
(Rom. 12:16), “Love does not boast, it is not proud” (1 Cor. 13:4).
In fact Paul warns Timothy that in the last days men
“will be lovers of themselves” (2 Tim. 3:2). …”
Good questioner, I like the questioner already,
“Why should we do anything to encourage people to become
“lovers of themselves” if Paul in fact warned others that
that would be the state of godlessness in the last days?”
Schuller: “I hope you don't [preach this] because you could do a lot of
damage to a lot of beautiful people. … if you preach that text, oh man,
I sure hop you give it the kind of interpretation that I do, or I’ll
tell you, you’ll drive them farther away and they’ll be madder than
hell at you and they’ll turn the Bible off, and they’ll switch you
off, and they’ll turn on the rock music and Madonna.
Just because it’s in the Bible doesn’t mean you should preach it.
… it is so difficult to preach some of those texts and not come
across as lacking humility…” 11/92 radio interview with Robert Schuller Rapidnet.com.
See how these people turn it round?
Robert Schuller: “… what sets me apart from fundamentalists [is that they] are
trying to convert everybody to believe how they believe. … We know the things
the major faiths can agree on. We try to focus on those without
offending those with different view-points. …” (3/23/89, USA Today). There’s the quote,
USA Today. -Schuller said: “When we know we have been redeemed
and we know we are part of God’s family, we are ready to dream that
great divine dream of building the kingdom of God in the world.”
Now the Kingdom of God I thought was not of this world,
didn’t you think so as well? Robert Schuller said after his
thousandth telecast, when he was congratulated by Mother Theresa,
she was still alive there; Billy Graham congratulated him,
S. Scott King, Martin Luther [King], all the living presidents of the
United States as well as Sammy Davis Junior – who was a Satanist.
They all congratulated him. “What we need is to positivise the
words that have only had a negative connotation. There is no greater
damage that can be done than to refer to the lost sinful condition
of man.” Let me tell you something, if man doesn’t realize that he is
in a lost sinful condition, then he will never need a savior, and then
he will be lost. “I don’t think anything has been done in the name
of Christ that and under the banner of Christianity that has proven
more destructive to human personality and, hence,
counterproductive to the evangelism enterprise than the often crude,
uncouth, and unchristian strategy of attempting to make people aware
of their lost and sinful condition.” (Time, March 18, 1985).
Wow, that’s disgusting. Well he goes further than that,
let’s have a look at what he really consists of. “The most effective
mantras employ the “M” sound. You can get the feel of it by
repeating the words, “I am, I am” many times over….
Transcendental Meditation or TM… is not a religion nor is it
necessarily anti-Christian.” (Peace of Mind Through Possibility
Thinking, pp. 131-32). Wow, you can chant
“I am, I am, I am”? What do you think about that?
Now you’re saying I’m God, surely you don’t mean that mister
Schuller, do you? Methodist, Anglican, all of them come
together, they all begin to believe in life after death.
Well here in self-esteem the new Reformation, Robert Schuller
writes, “To be born again means that we must be changed from a
negative to a positive self-image – from inferiority to self esteem,
from fear to love, from doubt to trust. ……. And we can pray,”
Note what mister Schuller says, Dr. Schuller, sorry, ‘Our Father in
heaven, honorable is our name [emphasis in the original].”
What is Robert Schuller saying? He’s saying he is God.
Is this biblical or is it demonic theology, you tell me, you choose;
it’s demonic. Who approves of his theology, who likes his theology?
There it says, “Discover Your Possibilities” Robert Schuller,
Positive, inspirational guidelines, who endorces it?
“Dr. Schuller has an amazing ministry,” Dr. Billy Graham.
Birds of a feather flock together. Who is Billy Graham?
Here he is, one of the greatest preachers of our time, Christian in
Winter, here he is with Nixon, “When you went into the ministry.
Politics lost one of its potentially greatest practitioners.”
Remember that Nixon had a Jesuit speech writer? Do you remember that?
We showed you those quotes. And, you know if everybody loves
you in the world, well; it gets kind of scary.
Here he is at Madison Square Gardens, here he is at the U.S.
Capital during the presentation of the Congressional Gold Medal that
he received with Al Gore sitting there. “On receiving honorary
doctorate from the Roman Catholic Belmont College, said the:
“gospel that founded this college is the same gospel which I preach
today.” Hello, Billy Graham, I thought you were a Protestant!
Why are you teaching Catholicism? And please tell me, why in all
your campaigns, do you have a team of 800 Catholic nuns and Jesuit
priests and all kinds of people like that? And why after your
campaign do you channel them to the Catholic priests to be incorporated
into Catholicism? Why do you do that if you are a Protestant?
“The Religious News Services reported on January 13, 1981,
“Pope John Paul II was closeted for almost two hours with the
Rev. Billy Graham, the world’s best-known Protestant evangelist.”
Religious news service, there it is, there he is together with him,
“the Pope is almost an evangelist” and here he is dressed in black,
and the Pope dressed in white, talking together.
It was through Billy Graham’s intervention that former President
Ronald Reagan set up an ambassador to the Vatican.
Against the Constitution of the United States. He has been the
linking agent from the White House to Rome. Graham wrote, this is his
own words, speaking for himself: “Reagan was the first American
President to appoint a full ambassador to the Vatican.
Before he made the appointment, he asked my view. I told him I thought
it would probably be a good thing – in spite of a number of potential
problems concerning the separation of church and state – and wrote an
extended confidential letter outlining my reasons.
Among other things, I told him I did not think it necessarily
violated the separation of church and state. For whatever reasons,
Mr. Reagan went ahead with the plan. Later my letter was leaked to the press.
It caused some consternation among my Baptist friends.”
Yes, of course it would cause a consternation, but his Baptist
friends might not know what he his, because it is so well covered up in
the world. If you want to read more about him, read Billy Graham and
His Friends, “Robert Schuller’s 1986 Possibilities magazine had
Templeton’s photo on the cover. ‘The lead article Templeton that
‘nothing exists except God’ (that’s pantheism) and that ‘the Christ
spirit dwells in every human being whether the person knows it or not’
(that’s universalism).” Templeton, now who received the
Templeton prize? Of course Billy Graham, “Graham told Schuller
during an interview: ‘… whether they come from the Muslim world, or
the Buddhist world, or the Christian world, they are members
of the Body of Christ, because they’ve been called by God.’”
Yes, you can be a member of the body of Christ in any of those
religions if you unknowingly do what the law requires because your
conscious dictates this, and God overlooks the ignorance of those
who do not know. “The ignorance God winks at” but, if you know the law
and you do it not, you will die, if you don’t know the law and you
still break the law, you will also die; that means eternally.
So Evangelicals and Catholics join forces eventually.
And Pope John Paul II is decried as the Superstar of the world.
“Pope deserves title of first citizen of the world.”
Newsweek October 15, 1979. He said that in ’79 already.
After September 11, ecumenism received a tremendous boost.
All the religions stated coming together, the Moslem’s and the
Protestant’s and the Catholics, they were all praying together.
Death O’ Protestantism Foreseen. By 1997, the Episcopal church,
with its bishop here, had the following to say, Bishop Adler,
“the world of the Lord told us that what we are witnessing is the end
of an era, that God is restoring His temple and that there would be
a priesthood, an Episcopacy that was an apostolic succession – a
main difference between Protestant and Catholicism.”
Now this is this church, this is – basically the high church of
England in the United States. Bishop Adler said
“that after the sermon, he ‘stood up to give a prophetic word’ but
fell on the floor and wept for 45 minutes.’ Then, he said, ‘We all
sensed what God was saying to us – We were witnessing the end of
Protestantism.’” And then he said “‘God’s church is Catholic!’
he declared. ‘It was Catholic in the beginning, and it will be
Catholic in the end.” “Churches agree Pope has overall authority”
isn’t that interesting? The Pope wrote this and he said in
his Crossing the Threshold of Hope that by the year 2000 we will need
to be more united. 1999, June: They wrote, “The Pope was recognized as
the overall authority in the Christian world”
in the Christian world entirely! “By an Anglican and Roman Catholic
commission yesterday which described him as a
“gift to be received by all the Churches”. Interesting, and then he
has The Gift of Authority, “the 45-page document, The Gift of
Authority, has been produced by the 18-member Anglican-Roman Catholic
International Commission…” and it “concluded that the Bishop of Rome
had a ‘specific ministry concerning the discernment of truth’”
what does that mean? That he’s infallible, so the Protestant world
has given up Protestantism. “Churches ‘should hold seances’”
yes, who said that? This was the Anglican Church in England, now
we’re ready for spiritism in the church, the churches are really
falling! Falling! These are no longer prophetic words, these are
false prophetic words, these are false prophets.
They are preaching a lie. And in the next lecture it will
become abundantly clear what is happening – don’t miss the next
lecture, Strange Fire. We’ll see some videos which will
be astounding. So, he said, what this Anglican priest said is that
we can actually talk to the deceased, and maybe we can reach
the atheists who died from the other side, and convince them now
that you see there after all, you don’t have to be an atheist anymore.
If that theology was true, couldn’t God do it?
The Roman Catholic Controversy, James R. White, he’s a writer who
says that “Today, well, are we coming together?
There are many reasons why we should stay separate”
he sees the problems. The Council of Trent said,
“to check unbridled spirits, it decrees that no one relying on his
own judgment shall, in matters of faith and morals pertaining to the
edification of Christian doctrine, distorting the Holy Scriptures in
accordance with his own conceptions, presume to interpret
them contrary to that sense which holy mother Church, to whom it
belongs to judge of their true sense and interpretation, has held
and holds,” so only the church may tell you what to believe, you’re
goyim, you’re too stupid to understand it yourself. Interesting.
The papacy, has it changed? No, “refinement of evil”
where the Pope outlines that every single ancient doctrine held by
Rome will be held. Therefore can I be part of the ecumenical movement,
yes or no? I cannot be, because I cannot accept this as my spiritual
leader. I have one leader and his name happens to be Jesus Christ.
He’s the only leader I have, and I have one creed, and that creed
happens to be the Bible and the Bible alone. That’s my creed,
otherwise I have no standard whatsoever. “Keeper of the Straight
and Narrow” there’s Cardinal Ratzinger, German-born Cardinal
Joseph Ratzinger, head of the “Congregation for Doctrine and
Faith.” They make sure that every ancient Catholic doctrine remains
and that no Protestant even recognizes it, they’re so sneaky.
Here is Cardinal Küng, and these people Hans Küng, all they want to
do is bring about ecumenism. So they make lots of Protestant
noises, didn’t the Jesuits say that “if you want to win someone, make
his noises,” yes or no? Yes, don’t trust them one little bit.
By 1986 we had the Council of Assisi and all the religions of the
world were present. That included Islam, Hinduism, all these
religions; they all came together at Assisi, there’s the Pope, there
are the patriarchs, there’s Runcy, there’s the Dalai Lama, Hinduism,
Buddhism, every single thing was present, where? At Assisi.
Do you know what’s interesting? After the Council of Assisi there
came an earthquake, and the whole Cathedral collapsed,
it’s almost like God said “gyt bmph” guess what they did, they
instantly rebuilt it to its former glory; instantly, immediately it
stands as an icon to Assisi, and that this Assisi meeting in ’86,
the first rot started of accepting the papacy as the ultimate.
By 1999 this is what happened, United Nations of Faith moved
Mountains. Article appeared in a Belgian national newspaper “Le Soir”,
dated 30th August 2000. “A general rehearsal is taking
place at the highest level, in a forum where the Supreme Being,
grand architect, - that’s Masonic language - or watchmaker of the
universe, if he exists at all – they’re derogatory – is to
recognize his own…” at a time when the United Nations will shortly
host the summit of the millennium, with the presence of the heads of
state of the entire world, all the world’s religious leaders have been
gathering in New York” how much of the world’s religious
leaders? All “to discuss the most important theme of world peace and
tolerance.” “The more distant object: to create a kind of United
Nations of Faith”. “Where the representatives of faith
and philosophies could meet and in order to discuss the future
together, whilst abandoning their fatwas, theses, and other terrible
arms of excommunication and exclusion and relegating them to
the cloak room.” Let’s get away from our separateness, let’s come
together. “This is a very noble ‘ecumenical initiative’,”
sponsored by whom? “Ted Turner,” A 33 degree Freemason, who hates
Christianity, who funded the initiative. He is vice-president of
Time Warner, founder of CNN. And “for every sin there is grace: ten
years ago, the flamboyant boss of instantaneous television
had declared that Christianity was nothing but an affair for ‘losers
and freaks’…” Ok, so he still believes it, now why would Ted
Turner finance something like that? Because he says Jane Fonda, his
wife turned Christian, and that changed his mind? I don’t think so.
I think it’s because he’s a 33 degree Freemason, and they have an
agenda. Well, “2000 representatives of very well, or less known
religions, the ones which are practiced the world over, or which
are almost an affair of confidence, only known in the corridors of the
UN, or the spiffing Waldorf Astoria hotel, which will be used for the
subsequent meetings and work. The pope sent the African cardinal
Francis Arzine, president of the pontifical council for interfaith
dialogue, representing the Jewish faith was the Chief Rabbi Lau of
Jerusalem, the Buddhists were deprived of the presence of the
Dalai Lama. This shows that religion is never far removed from
politics: China threatened to boycott the meeting if he went.”
That’s just a game they’re playing.
Well, the initiative, “Bishop Desmond Tutu”
said, let’s go ahead with it, and “in the US and in particular in
circles of the UN, the “first” initiative has been very welcomed.
Nevertheless, one needs to render to Caesar, or rather to
John-Paul II, his dues. It is indeed thanks to him that the way of
reconciliation was started at Assisi in 1985.”
Culminating in that meeting in 1986. Well the Pope then May 2001
visited the famous Mosque in Damascus, “John Paul II made
history on Sunday by becoming the first Pontiff ever to enter a
mosque, and urged Christians and Muslims to forgive each other.”
That’s the mosque, remember I showed it to you;
the famous mosque in Damascus, and we walked through it.
And, we look at this amazing structure with these people having
the same rituals as in Roman Catholicism, and you will remember
that we spoke about the head of John the Baptist that is stored in
this mosque. So it’s significant that the Pope went to that
particular mosque to go and seek reconciliation.
Although reconciliation is just a word for the goyim, the outside;
the inside has always been reconciled. And we know already
that the pope then kissed the Koran. So the initiative is to bring all
the religions, this is a symbol of the religions dancing together, a
symbol of Judaism, and Buddhism, and Christianity, and Hinduism and
all of them coming together in a one great big happy family.
This is the title page of Rotarian Bishop Lehman’s document for
“World Peace Day” and the emblem of the “World Conference of Religions.”
Hinduism, Buddhism, and finally we have a parliament
of world religions; now this parliament of world religions is an
outcome of the Assisi meeting, and this was their Africa day;
they have the sun symbol in the middle, there are interesting
symbols in this. So at this interfaith meeting in 1999,
“as reported the Associated Press, with the Dalai Lama, sitting by his
right side, this October [1999]” there was another meeting
“in Rome the Pope presided at a special council of some 2000
religious leaders of various faiths, sects, and cults.”
Now I’m going to show you a video of that in a moment of what happened there.
“The Pontiff told the assembled Buddhist monks, Zoroastrian
priests, Catholic cardinals, Hindu gurus, American Indian shamen,
Jewish rabbis, and ecumenical clergy” that’s all the Protestants
that there are, “that all must join in condemning” who?
“The Christian fundamentalists” wow, I thought the problems were
elsewhere, but he obviously has an inside tact so he knows who the
real problem people are. It’s the Christian fundamentalists, why?
Because they commit the ultimate crime of telling people about who?
Jesus.
Don’t you think there’s a total onslaught on Jesus Christ?
I believe there is.
“Christian fundamentalists who ‘abuse speech’ and whose efforts at
converting others ‘incite hatred and violence.’”
Didn’t Miss Kyung say the same thing, yes or no?
She said the same thing at the World Council of Churches.
So we want unity, but please let this unity be on a universal
Christ, just leave Jesus out of this. This is an attack on Jesus Christ.
“All present were in accord on two key points: (1) Pope John
Paul II was endorsed by consensus as the planet’s chief spiritual
guide and overseer;” that’s interesting. “And (2) Religious
fundamentalists who refuse to go along with the global ecumenical
movement” that would include me for example, “are to be silenced.”
So who knows how many times you can still hear this message,
“they must be denounced as ‘dangerous extremists full of hate.’”
(True bible believers denounced at Papal Conference.
Power of Prophecy (March 2000, Vol. 2000-03, p. 3).
That’s why we have hate laws, you’re not supposed to preach this
message, you’re not supposed to preach that Jesus Christ is Lord,
then you are a dangerous extremist full of hate. Well I figured I better
preach it before we can no longer preach it.
And that’s why I’m here to tell you about these things.
The onslaught is not against me, the onslaught is against the Lord.
And he predicted that this was going to happen.
Well let’s have a look at this Masonic meeting, you will see three
candles in this meeting, that’s Masonic. They light the solar
candles, which are little covered candles, which are used in Hinduism
for example as solar candles, and in Buddhism and in Eastern
mysticism. And you will see that they use all kinds of music, just
like the Bible said. In fact the main rock band of Italy gave the
background music at the ceremony on the one stage with the papacy on
the other stage. And ever religious leader of note in the world was
there of every religion to bow down and give homage to the pope.
Interesting, let’s watch it.
He looks so smug doesn’t he?
Well here they all are, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Shintuism,
Soca Gaya, all of them, Protestantism, all of them bowing
down acknowledging the pope. Now didn’t the Bible say that the
whole world would wonder after him, yes or no? And that she would not
suffer loss of children, didn’t the Bible say that?
Judaism was there, all the religions were there.
Now this means that we are very very close to the close of time.
This is an interesting picture that was published once by Der
Spiegel, Der Spiegel, and here you have a statue of Caesar showing a
finger; that’s actually a Masonic thing, but never mind there he does it.
Then you have Mussolini on the other side giving the finger.
And then they have Rom here, “Der Papst, Die Kirche Und Die
Sunde” the Pope, the Church, and the Sin, and they have the Pope
over there in full sun worship regalia; and then they have the
prostitute. It’s almost like they know something right?
This prostitute, the Bible says, is the woman that rides the beast,
the great prostituted that is over the nations; and all the kings of
the world give their power unto the beast. We’ve seen that the ruling
powers in the world actually come from very few families today,
highly occult families. “And the woman which thou sawest is
that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.”
Revelation 17:18. “And I heard another voice from heaven, saying,
Come out of her, my people that ye be not partakers of her sins, and
that ye receive not of her plagues.” Revelations 18:4.
What do you think they have planned for those who harbor a
spirit of separateness? What do you think they have
planned for those who say, who say, like the Bible says:
“Come out and be separate that you receive not her plagues,”
so that you don’t take part in her sins. What do you think will be
their conclusion about such a matter? I think this is a very very
serious issue, and we’re going to have lectures on this when we get
there. We’ll see what their final plans are, and who they actually
pinpoint as opposition, that would be interesting, don’t you think?
We’ll let them speak for themselves, in the meantime as for
me and my house, I cannot join this ecumenical council, and I would
like to uplift Jesus Christ to you tonight as the only Savior on this
world and follow the biblical way and none will be lost.
That is his promise, why not take him at his word? Amen.