-
I want to speak about
a forgotten conflict.
-
It's a conflict that rarely
hits the headlines.
-
It happens right here,
in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
-
Now, most people outside of Africa
don't know much about the war in Congo,
-
so let me give you
a couple of key facts.
-
The Congolese conflict
-
is the deadliest conflict
since World War II.
-
It has caused almost four million deaths.
-
It has destabilized most of central Africa
-
for the past 18 years.
-
It is the largest ongoing
humanitarian crisis in the world.
-
That's why I first went to Congo in 2001.
-
I was a young humanitarian aid worker,
-
and I met this woman who was my age.
-
She was called Isabelle.
-
Local militias
had attacked Isabelle's village.
-
They had killed many men,
raped many women.
-
They had looted everything.
-
And then they wanted to take Isabelle,
-
but her husband stepped in,
-
and he said, "No,
please don't take Isabelle.
-
Take me instead."
-
So he had gone to the forest
with the militias,
-
and Isabelle had never seen him again.
-
Well, it's because of people
like Isabelle and her husband
-
that I have devoted my career
to studying this world
-
that we know so little about.
-
Although there is one story
about Congo that you may have heard.
-
It's a story about minerals and rape.
-
Policy statements and media reports
-
both usually focus on a primary cause
of violence in Congo
-
-- the illegal exploitation
and trafficking of natural resources --
-
and on the main consequence
-
-- sexual abuse of women and girls
as a weapon of war.
-
So, not that these two issues
aren't important and tragic.
-
They are, but today,
-
I want to tell you a different story.
-
I want to tell you a story
that emphasizes a core cause
-
of the ongoing conflict.
-
Violence in Congo
is in large part driven
-
by local bottom-up conflicts
-
that international peace efforts
have failed to help address.
-
The story starts from the fact
that not only is Congo notable
-
for being the world's worst
ongoing humanitarian crisis,
-
but it is also home
to some of the largest
-
international peacebuilding
efforts in the world.
-
Congo hosts the largest
-
and most expensive United Nations
peacekeeping mission in the world.
-
It was also the site of the first
European-led peacekeeping mission,
-
and for its first cases ever,
-
the International Criminal Court
-
chose to prosecute Congolese warlords.
-
In 2006, when Congo held
the first free national elections
-
in its history,
-
many observers thought
that an end to violence in the region
-
had finally come.
-
The international community
-
lauded the successful
organization of these elections
-
as finally an example
of successful international intervention
-
in a failed state.
-
But the eastern provinces
-
have continued to face
massive population displacements
-
and horrific human rights violations.
-
Shortly before I went
back there last summer,
-
there was a horrible massacre
-
in the province of South Kivu.
-
Thirty-three people were killed.
-
They were mostly women and children,
-
and many of them were hacked to death.
-
During the past eight years,
-
fighting in the eastern provinces
has regularly reignited
-
full-scale civil and international war.
-
So basically, every time we feel
that we are on the brink of peace,
-
the conflict explodes again.
-
Why?
-
Why have the massive international efforts
-
failed to help Congo achieve lasting peace
-
and security?
-
Well, my answer to this question
-
revolves around two central observations.
-
First, one of the main reasons
for the continuation of violence in Congo
-
is fundamentally local,
-
and when I say local,
-
I really mean at the level
of the individual, the family,
-
the clan, the municipality,
the community, the district,
-
sometimes the ethnic group.
-
For instance, you remember the story
of Isabelle that I told you.
-
Well, the reason why militias
had attacked Isabelle's village
-
was because they wanted to take the land
-
that the villagers needed
to cultivate food and to survive.
-
The second central observation
is that international peace efforts
-
have failed to help
address local conflicts
-
because of the presence
of a dominant peacebuilding culture.
-
So what I mean is that
-
Western and African diplomats,
-
United Nations peacekeepers, donors,
-
the staff of most
nongovernmental organizations
-
that work with the resolution of conflict,
-
they all share a specific way
-
of seeing the world.
-
And I was one of these people,
and I shared this culture,
-
so I know all too well how powerful it is.
-
Throughout the world,
and throughout conflict zones,
-
this common culture shapes
the intervener's understanding
-
of the causes of violence
-
as something that is primarily located
-
in the national and international spheres.
-
It shapes our understanding
of the path to world peace
-
as something again that requires
top down intervention
-
to address national
and international tensions.
-
And it shapes our understanding
of the roles of foreign actors
-
as engaging in national
and international peace processes.
-
Even more importantly,
this common culture
-
enables international peacebuilders
-
to ignore the micro-level tensions
-
that often jeopardize
the macro-level settlements.
-
So for instance, in Congo,
-
because of how they are
socialized and trained,
-
United Nations officials,
donors, diplomats,
-
the staff of most
nongovernmental organizations,
-
they interpret continued fighting
and massacres as a top-down problem.
-
To them, the violence they see
-
is the consequence of tensions
between President Kabila
-
and various national opponents,
-
and tensions between Congo,
Rwanda, and Uganda.
-
In addition, these
international peacebuilders
-
view local conflicts
-
as simply the result
of national and international tensions,
-
insufficient state authority,
-
and what they call
the Congolese people's
-
so-called "inherent
penchant for violence."
-
The dominant culture
also constructs intervention
-
at the national and international levels
-
as the only natural and legitimate task
-
for United Nations staffers and diplomats.
-
And it elevates the organization
-
of general elections,
-
which is now a sort of cure-all,
-
as the most crucial state
reconstruction mechanisms
-
over more effective
state-building approaches.
-
And that happens not only in Congo
-
but also in many other conflict zones.
-
But let's dig deeper,
-
into the other main sources of violence.
-
In Congo, continuing violence
-
is motivated not only by the national
and international causes
-
but also by longstanding
bottom-up agendas
-
whose main instigators
are villagers, traditional chiefs,
-
community chiefs, or ethnic leaders.
-
Many conflicts revolve around political,
social, and economic stakes
-
that are distinctively local.
-
For instance, there is
a lot of competition
-
at the village or district level
-
over who can be chief of village
or chief of territory
-
according to traditional law,
-
and who can control
the distribution of land
-
and the exploitation
of local mining sites.
-
This competition often results
in localized fighting,
-
for instance in one village or territory,
-
and quite frequently,
it escalates into generalized fighting,
-
so across a whole province,
-
and even at times
into neighboring countries.
-
Take the conflict
-
between Congolese of Rwandan descent
-
and the so-called indigenous communities
-
of the Kivus.
-
This conflict started in the 1930s
during Belgian colonization,
-
when both communities competed
-
over access to land and to local power.
-
Then, in 1960,
after Congolese independence,
-
it escalated because each camp
-
tried to align with national politicians
-
but still to address their local agendas.
-
And then, at the time
of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda,
-
these local actors allied
with Congolese and Rwandan armed groups,
-
but still to advance their local agendas
in the province of the Kivus.
-
And since then, these local disputes
over land and local power
-
have fueled violence,
-
and they have regularly jeopardized
-
the national and
international settlements.
-
So we can wonder why
in these circumstances
-
the international peacebuilders
have failed to help implement
-
local peacebuilding programs.
-
And the answer is that
international interveners
-
deem the resolution of grassroots conflict
-
an unimportant, unfamiliar,
and illegitimate task.
-
The very idea of becoming involved
at the local level clashes fundamentally
-
with existing cultural norms,
-
and it threatens
key organizational interests.
-
For instance, the very identity
of the United Nations
-
as this macro-level
diplomatic organization
-
would be upended
-
if it were to refocus on local conflicts.
-
And the result is that
neither the internal resistance
-
to the dominant ways of working
-
nor the external shocks
-
have managed to convince
international actors
-
that they should reevaluate
their understanding
-
of violence and intervention.
-
And so far, there have been
only very few exceptions.
-
There have been exceptions,
but only very few exceptions
-
to this broad pattern.
-
So to wrap up,
the story I just told you
-
is a story about how
a dominant peacebuilding culture
-
shapes the intervener's understanding
-
of what the causes of violence are,
-
how peace is made,
-
and what interventions should accomplish.
-
These understandings enable
international peacebuilders
-
to ignore the micro-level foundations
-
that are so necessary
for sustainable peace.
-
The resulting inattention
to local conflicts
-
leads to inadequate peacebuilding
in the short term
-
and potential war resumption
in the long term.
-
And what's fascinating
is that this analysis
-
helps us to better understand
many cases of lasting conflict
-
and international intervention failures,
in Africa and elsewhere.
-
Local conflicts fuel violence
in most war and post-war environments,
-
from Afghanistan to Sudan
to Timor-Leste,
-
and in the rare cases
where there have been comprehensive,
-
bottom-up peacebuilding initiatives,
-
these attempts have been successful
at making peace sustainable.
-
One of the best examples is the contrast
-
between the relatively peaceful
situation in Somaliland,
-
which benefited from sustained
grassroots peacebuilding initiatives,
-
and the violence prevalent
in the rest of Somalia,
-
where peacebuilding
has been mostly top-down.
-
And there are several other cases
-
in which local, grassroots
conflict resolution
-
has made a crucial difference.
-
So if we want international
peacebuilding to work,
-
in addition to any top-down intervention,
-
conflicts must be resolved
from the bottom up.
-
And again, it's not that national
and international tensions don't matter.
-
They do.
-
And it's not that national
and international peacepbuilding
-
isn't necessary.
-
It is.
-
Instead, it is that both macro-level
and micro-level peacebuilding are needed
-
to make peace sustainable,
-
and local nongovernmental organizations,
-
local authorities,
and civil society representatives
-
should be the main actors
-
in the bottom-up process.
-
So of course, there are obstacles.
-
Local actors often lack the funding
-
and sometimes the logistical means
and the technical capacity
-
to implement effective,
local peacebuilding programs.
-
So international actors
should expand their funding and support
-
for local conflict resolution.
-
As for Congo, what can be done?
-
After two decades of conflict
-
and the deaths of millions,
-
it's clear that we need
to change our approach.
-
Based on my field research,
I believe that international
-
and Congolese actors
-
should pay more attention
to the resolution of land conflict
-
and the promotion
of inter-community reconciliation.
-
So for instance,
in the province of the Kivus,
-
the Life & Peace Institute
and its Congolese partners
-
have set up inter-community forums
-
to discuss the specifics
of local conflicts over land,
-
and these forums have found solutions
-
to help manage the violence.
-
That's the kind of program
that is sorely needed
-
throughout eastern Congo.
-
It's with programs like this
-
that we can help people
like Isabelle and her husband.
-
So these will not be magic wands,
-
but because they take into account
deeply rooted causes of the violence,
-
they could definitely be game-changers.
-
Thank you.
-
(Applause)