< Return to Video

The mathematics of sidewalk illusions - Fumiko Futamura

  • 0:08 - 0:10
    If you're ever walking down the street
  • 0:10 - 0:13
    and come across an oddly stretched out
    image, like this,
  • 0:13 - 0:17
    you'll have an opportunity
    to see something remarkable,
  • 0:17 - 0:20
    but only if you stand in exactly
    the right spot.
  • 0:20 - 0:25
    That happens because these works
    employ a technique called anamorphosis.
  • 0:25 - 0:29
    Anamorphosis is a special case
    of perspective art,
  • 0:29 - 0:32
    where artists represent realistic
    three-dimensional views
  • 0:32 - 0:34
    on two-dimensional surfaces.
  • 0:34 - 0:35
    Though it's common today,
  • 0:35 - 0:40
    this kind of perspective drawing has only
    been around since the Italian Renaissance.
  • 0:40 - 0:43
    Ancient art often showed all figures
    on the same plane,
  • 0:43 - 0:47
    varying in size by symbolic importance.
  • 0:47 - 0:51
    Classical Greek and Roman artists realized
    they could make objects seem further
  • 0:51 - 0:53
    by drawing them smaller,
  • 0:53 - 0:59
    but many earlier attempts at perspective
    were inconsistent or incorrect.
  • 0:59 - 1:01
    In 15th century Florence,
  • 1:01 - 1:03
    artists realized the illusion
    of perspective
  • 1:03 - 1:06
    could be achieved with higher degrees
    of sophisitciation
  • 1:06 - 1:09
    by applying mathematical principles.
  • 1:09 - 1:13
    In 1485, Leonardo da Vinci
    manipulated the mathematics
  • 1:13 - 1:18
    to create the first known
    anamorphic drawing.
  • 1:18 - 1:21
    A number of other artists later
    picked up the technique,
  • 1:21 - 1:26
    including Hans Holbein in The Ambassadors.
  • 1:26 - 1:29
    This painting features a distorted
    shape that forms into a skull
  • 1:29 - 1:33
    as the viewer approaches from the side.
  • 1:33 - 1:36
    In order to understand how artists
    achieve that effect,
  • 1:36 - 1:40
    we first have to understand how
    perspective drawings work in general.
  • 1:40 - 1:42
    Imagine looking out a window.
  • 1:42 - 1:45
    Light bounces off objects
    and into your eye,
  • 1:45 - 1:47
    intersecting the window along the way.
  • 1:47 - 1:51
    Now, imagine you could paint the image
    you see directly onto the window
  • 1:51 - 1:56
    while standing still and keeping
    only one eye open.
  • 1:56 - 1:59
    The result would be nearly
    indistinguishable from the actual view
  • 1:59 - 2:02
    with your brain adding depth
    to the 2-D picture,
  • 2:02 - 2:04
    but only from that one spot.
  • 2:04 - 2:07
    Standing even just a bit off
    to the side
  • 2:07 - 2:10
    would make the drawing
    lose its 3-D effect.
  • 2:10 - 2:12
    Artists understand that
    a perspective drawing
  • 2:12 - 2:16
    is just a projection
    onto a 2-D plane.
  • 2:16 - 2:21
    This allows them to use math to come up
    with basic rules of perspective
  • 2:21 - 2:24
    that allow them to draw without a window.
  • 2:24 - 2:26
    One is that parallel lines, like these,
  • 2:26 - 2:33
    can only be drawn as parallel if they're
    parallel to the plane of the canvas.
  • 2:33 - 2:37
    Otherwise, they need to be drawn
    converging to a common point
  • 2:37 - 2:40
    known as the vanishing point.
  • 2:40 - 2:43
    So that's a standard prospective drawing.
  • 2:43 - 2:46
    With an anamorphic drawing,
    like The Ambassadors,
  • 2:46 - 2:50
    directly facing the canvas makes the image
    look stretched and distorted,
  • 2:50 - 2:54
    but put your eye in exactly the right spot
    way off to the side,
  • 2:54 - 2:57
    and the skull materializes.
  • 2:57 - 2:59
    Going back to the window analogy,
  • 2:59 - 3:03
    it's as if the artist painted
    onto a window positioned at an angle
  • 3:03 - 3:05
    instead of straight on,
  • 3:05 - 3:09
    though that's not how Renaissance artists
    actually created anamorphic drawings.
  • 3:09 - 3:12
    Typically, they draw a normal image
    onto one surface,
  • 3:12 - 3:14
    then use a light,
  • 3:14 - 3:15
    a grid,
  • 3:15 - 3:20
    or even strings to project it
    onto a canvas at an angle.
  • 3:20 - 3:24
    Now let's say you want to make
    an anamorphic sidewalk drawing.
  • 3:24 - 3:26
    In this case, you want to create
    the illusion
  • 3:26 - 3:30
    that a 3-D image has been added
    seamlessly into an existing seam.
  • 3:30 - 3:33
    You can first put a window
    in front of the sidewalk
  • 3:33 - 3:36
    and draw what you want to add
    onto the window.
  • 3:36 - 3:39
    It should be in the same perspective
    as the rest of the seam,
  • 3:39 - 3:43
    which might require the use of those
    basic rules of perspective.
  • 3:43 - 3:45
    Once the drawing's complete,
  • 3:45 - 3:47
    you can use a projector placed
    where your eye was
  • 3:47 - 3:50
    to project your drawing down
    onto the sidewalk,
  • 3:50 - 3:52
    then chalk over it.
  • 3:52 - 3:54
    The sidewalk drawing
    and the drawing on the window
  • 3:54 - 3:58
    will be nearly indistinguishable
    from that point of view,
  • 3:58 - 4:00
    so viewers' brains will again be tricked
  • 4:00 - 4:04
    into believing that the drawing
    on the ground is three-dimensional.
  • 4:04 - 4:08
    And you don't have to project onto
    a flat surface to create this illusion.
  • 4:08 - 4:10
    You can project onto multiple surfaces,
  • 4:10 - 4:14
    or assemble a jumble of objects,
    that from the right point of view,
  • 4:14 - 4:18
    appears to be something else entirely.
  • 4:18 - 4:20
    All over the planet, you can find
    solid surfaces
  • 4:20 - 4:24
    giving way to strange, wonderful,
    or terrifying visions.
  • 4:24 - 4:27
    From your sidewalk
    to your computer screen,
  • 4:27 - 4:31
    these are just some of the ways
    that math and perspective
  • 4:31 - 4:33
    can open up whole new worlds.
Title:
The mathematics of sidewalk illusions - Fumiko Futamura
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Team:
closed TED
Project:
TED-Ed
Duration:
04:55
  • seam -> scene

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video, there are 2 'seam's which should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30
    that a 3-D image has been added
    seamlessly into an existing seam.
    3:36 - 3:39
    It should be in the same perspective
    as the rest of the seam,

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video, there are two 'seam's which should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30
    that a 3-D image has been added
    seamlessly into an existing seam.

    3:36 - 3:39
    It should be in the same perspective
    as the rest of the seam,

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video, there are two 'seam's which should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30
    that a 3-D image has been added
    seamlessly into an existing seam.

    3:36 - 3:39
    It should be in the same perspective
    as the rest of the seam,

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video, there are two 'seam's which should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30
    that a 3-D image has been added
    seamlessly into an existing seam.

    3:36 - 3:39
    It should be in the same perspective
    as the rest of the seam,

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video, there are two 'seam's which should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30
    that a 3-D image has been added
    seamlessly into an existing seam.

    3:36 - 3:39
    It should be in the same perspective
    as the rest of the seam,

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video, there are two 'seam's which should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30
    that a 3-D image has been added
    seamlessly into an existing seam.

    3:36 - 3:39
    It should be in the same perspective
    as the rest of the seam,

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video, there are two 'seam's which should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30
    that a 3-D image has been added
    seamlessly into an existing seam.

    3:36 - 3:39
    It should be in the same perspective
    as the rest of the seam,

    Thank you.

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video, there are two 'seam's which should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30
    that a 3-D image has been added
    seamlessly into an existing seam.

    3:36 - 3:39
    It should be in the same perspective
    as the rest of the seam,

    Thank you.

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video, there are two 'seam's which should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30
    that a 3-D image has been added
    seamlessly into an existing seam.

    3:36 - 3:39
    It should be in the same perspective
    as the rest of the seam,

    Thank you.

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video, there are two 'seam's which should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30
    that a 3-D image has been added
    seamlessly into an existing seam.

    3:36 - 3:39
    It should be in the same perspective
    as the rest of the seam,

    Thank you.

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video, there are two 'seam's which should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30
    that a 3-D image has been added
    seamlessly into an existing seam.

    3:36 - 3:39
    It should be in the same perspective
    as the rest of the seam,

    Thank you.

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video, there are two 'seam's which should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30
    that a 3-D image has been added
    seamlessly into an existing seam.

    3:36 - 3:39
    It should be in the same perspective
    as the rest of the seam,

    Thank you.

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video, there are two 'seam's which should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30: seam.

    3:36 - 3:39: seam,

    Thank you.

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video, there are two 'seam's which should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30: seam.

    3:36 - 3:39: seam,

    Thank you.

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video, there are two 'seam's which should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30: seam.

    3:36 - 3:39: seam,

    Thank you.

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video, there are two 'seam's which should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30: seam.

    3:36 - 3:39: seam,

    Thank you.

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video, there are two 'seam's which should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30: seam.

    3:36 - 3:39: seam,

    Thank you.

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video,
    there are two subtitles where 'seam' should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30: seam.

    3:36 - 3:39: seam,

    Thank you.

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video,
    there are two subtitles where 'seam' should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30: seam.

    3:36 - 3:39: seam,

    Thank you.

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video,
    there are two subtitles where 'seam' should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30: seam.

    3:36 - 3:39: seam,

    Thank you.

  • On the 5th version of the original English transcription of this video,
    there are two subtitles where 'seam' should be corrected as 'scene' as below:

    3:26 - 3:30: seam.

    3:36 - 3:39: seam,

    Thank you.

English subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions