< Return to Video

The Power of Polarities - Shoshana Boyd Gelfand at TEDxJerusalem

  • 0:08 - 0:09
    What if I told you
  • 0:09 - 0:12
    that there exsists, a single concept
  • 0:12 - 0:14
    that's completely changed
  • 0:14 - 0:18
    the way I think about solving problems?
  • 0:18 - 0:19
    What if I told you
  • 0:19 - 0:21
    that you instinctively
  • 0:21 - 0:23
    know this concept, and in fact
  • 0:23 - 0:26
    you're using it, right here, right now
  • 0:26 - 0:29
    without even thinking about it.
  • 0:29 - 0:32
    What if I told you
  • 0:32 - 0:36
    that if you could hone your natural ability
    to use this concept,
  • 0:36 - 0:38
    it could change your life,
  • 0:38 - 0:41
    or even the world.
  • 0:41 - 0:42
    And what if I told you
  • 0:42 - 0:44
    that this wouldn't involve
  • 0:44 - 0:49
    joining a cult, taking illegal drugs
    or converting to a new religion?
  • 0:49 - 0:52
    The concept is called:
  • 0:52 - 0:54
    "Polarity Management".
  • 0:54 - 0:57
    I learned it twenty years ago
    when I was a Rabbi in Chicago.
  • 0:57 - 0:58
    And since then, I've lost count
  • 0:58 - 1:00
    of the number of times
  • 1:00 - 1:03
    I've scribbled a crash course
    on the back of a napkin.
  • 1:03 - 1:05
    Applying it to problems
  • 1:05 - 1:08
    as diverse as organizational change issues,
  • 1:08 - 1:10
    theological dilemmas,
  • 1:10 - 1:14
    and even raising my own children.
  • 1:14 - 1:17
    I also know that it works with larger,
    global issues
  • 1:17 - 1:19
    because the person who developed this tool,
  • 1:19 - 1:22
    and taught it to me --
    Dr. Berry Johnson --
  • 1:22 - 1:25
    has used it with the US Department of Defense,
  • 1:25 - 1:27
    the International Atomic Energy Agency,
  • 1:27 - 1:29
    and even the BBC.
  • 1:29 - 1:33
    Although I agree they could use
    a refresh course at the moment.
  • 1:33 - 1:35
    So let me invite you,
  • 1:35 - 1:40
    to come on a journey with me,
    into the world of polarities.
  • 1:40 - 1:44
    Now, the best gateway,
    is this very famous sketch.
  • 1:44 - 1:47
    Have a look and tell me --
    how many of you
  • 1:47 - 1:52
    initially saw the two white faces
    looking at each other?
  • 1:52 - 1:54
    Wow, a lot.
  • 1:54 - 2:00
    How many of you, initially, immediately,
    saw the black goblet in the middle?
  • 2:00 - 2:02
    All right, a few...
  • 2:02 - 2:07
    Well, whenever I show this sketch some people
    see one and some see the other
  • 2:07 - 2:11
    but no one ever sees both simultaneously
  • 2:11 - 2:18
    because the human brain isn't designed to be able
    to see those two images at the same time.
  • 2:18 - 2:23
    All we can do is flow, back and forth
    to see both perspectives
  • 2:23 - 2:27
    and acknowledge that this is both,
    two faces and a goblet.
  • 2:28 - 2:32
    That insight is at the very heart of polarities,
  • 2:32 - 2:36
    and I ask that you hold on to it,
    and keep it with you as we continue
  • 2:36 - 2:43
    because put simply, a polarity is an
    ongoing problem with two correct answers
  • 2:43 - 2:45
    that are interdependent.
  • 2:47 - 2:52
    The polarities aren't just some cute optical illusion,
    they're a natural force
  • 2:52 - 2:55
    like magnetism or gravity,
  • 2:55 - 2:58
    the part of the very fabric of the universe
  • 2:58 - 3:04
    and because they are part of nature,
    there are rules that govern their behavior.
  • 3:04 - 3:08
    Once you know these rules, you can predict
    what's going to happen next with the polarity
  • 3:08 - 3:12
    and then you can proactively decide
    what you want to do about it.
  • 3:14 - 3:19
    So lets see how this works, with a very simple polarity
    that you do all the time:
  • 3:19 - 3:25
    breathing consists of two interdependent actions
  • 3:26 - 3:31
    inhale and exhale.
    It's like the goblet sketch.
  • 3:31 - 3:36
    You can't do both at the same time,
    but both are vital and necessary.
  • 3:36 - 3:39
    But what would happen
    if we go through this slowly?
  • 3:39 - 3:44
    We choose one pole and
    it feels good for a few seconds
  • 3:44 - 3:47
    and then starts to feel uncomfortable
  • 3:47 - 3:50
    which forces us to shift to the opposite pole
  • 3:50 - 3:56
    which also feels good for a few seconds,
    and then becomes uncomfortable,
  • 3:56 - 4:00
    which forces us to shift back once again
  • 4:00 - 4:04
    This ongoing motion happens because
  • 4:04 - 4:10
    breathing is an ongoing problem with
    two correct answers that are interdependent.
  • 4:12 - 4:18
    The only choice we have with a polarity is
    whether we're going to manage that flow
  • 4:18 - 4:22
    back and forth in a way
    that's positive and life-enhancing
  • 4:22 - 4:26
    or whether we're going to flow
    back and forth in a way
  • 4:26 - 4:30
    that's negative and uncomfortable.
  • 4:30 - 4:32
    Now this may seem simple, and obvious
  • 4:32 - 4:37
    because we're all fairly good at
    managing the breathing polarity
  • 4:37 - 4:39
    we've been doing it for a long time.
  • 4:39 - 4:44
    But, the same concept and principles
    that apply to breathing
  • 4:44 - 4:47
    we can apply to any other polarity.
  • 4:48 - 4:51
    So let's look at another familiar one:
  • 4:51 - 4:53
    think of a relationship in your life,
  • 4:53 - 4:56
    an important relationship.
  • 4:57 - 5:01
    I'd be willing to bet, that if
    this relationship is going well,
  • 5:01 - 5:06
    it's because your constantly managing
    the flow between meeting your own needs
  • 5:06 - 5:09
    and meeting your partner's needs.
  • 5:09 - 5:13
    In a good relationship both
    people look after themselves
  • 5:13 - 5:15
    and they look after each other,
  • 5:15 - 5:19
    creating a wonderfully, virtuous cycle.
  • 5:19 - 5:22
    But when relationships go bad,
    it's often because
  • 5:22 - 5:25
    someone is either over-focused
    on themself
  • 5:25 - 5:29
    at the expense of their partner
  • 5:29 - 5:33
    and they're left feeling selfish,
    isolated and lonely
  • 5:33 - 5:36
    or they've over-focused
    on their partner's needs
  • 5:36 - 5:42
    at the expense of their own,
    and they're feeling unappreciated and resentful.
  • 5:42 - 5:47
    Or, even worse, they're feeling resentful
    because they're feeling lonely
  • 5:47 - 5:52
    which makes them feel more resentful,
    which makes them feel more lonely
  • 5:52 - 5:55
    and the relationship deteriorates
    and ultimately fails.
  • 5:57 - 6:02
    I think the great sage Hillel, expressed this
    polarity perfectly 2000 years ago
  • 6:02 - 6:08
    when he said: "if I'm not for myself,
    who will be for me...
  • 6:08 - 6:13
    ...but if I'm only for myself, what am I?"
  • 6:13 - 6:16
    He would've been a great marriage counselor,
  • 6:16 - 6:20
    or even a good polarity coach.
  • 6:20 - 6:24
    Now, polarities don't just work with things like
    breathing or one-to-one relationships,
  • 6:24 - 6:28
    they also play out in larger institutional structures
  • 6:28 - 6:32
    particularly around issues like
    organizational change,
  • 6:32 - 6:35
    because there's always one group that
    wants things to stay the same
  • 6:35 - 6:39
    and another group that wants things to change.
  • 6:39 - 6:41
    Its a tradition change polarity.
  • 6:41 - 6:46
    And I remember the first time
    I hit up against it full force
  • 6:46 - 6:51
    it was 1987, and I had just begun
    my studies to become a Rabbi.
  • 6:51 - 6:57
    The debate had been raging for years whether
    or not to ordain women as Rabbis.
  • 6:57 - 7:00
    Some said, that Judaism
    needed to be responsive
  • 7:00 - 7:04
    to the modern world, where
    men and women are equal
  • 7:04 - 7:08
    and if it didn't it risked becoming
    outdated and irrelevant.
  • 7:09 - 7:12
    But there was another camp, that worried
  • 7:12 - 7:16
    that a female Rabbi
    was a contradiction in terms
  • 7:16 - 7:22
    an inauthentic expression of a tradition
    that was thousands of years old.
  • 7:22 - 7:27
    This group argued that continuity
    with the past was important
  • 7:27 - 7:32
    and that ordaining woman would
    endanger Judaism's authenticity.
  • 7:34 - 7:36
    Which group was right?
  • 7:36 - 7:41
    Well, you can see as well as me,
    that it was just like the goblet sketch
  • 7:41 - 7:46
    one group saw the pink boxes and
    one group saw the blue.
  • 7:46 - 7:51
    Both groups saw one aspect of
    a complex problem.
  • 7:51 - 7:56
    Both groups had a valid fear
    that concerned them,
  • 7:56 - 8:00
    and a sincere value
    that they were holding onto.
  • 8:00 - 8:06
    Each group had difficulty shifting view point,
    to see the perspective of the other
  • 8:06 - 8:10
    but that's what was needed if my community
    was going to thrive.
  • 8:10 - 8:13
    We would need to both pursue continuity
  • 8:13 - 8:16
    and be responsive to change.
  • 8:18 - 8:21
    Well in the end, a vote was taken
  • 8:21 - 8:25
    a decision was made,
    and here I stand
  • 8:25 - 8:28
    a female Rabbi.
  • 8:28 - 8:32
    On the surface, it may look like change won,
  • 8:32 - 8:34
    but with the polarity, if either side
  • 8:34 - 8:39
    wins conclusively, the community looses,
  • 8:39 - 8:44
    because it ends up in the
    downside of the pole that won.
  • 8:44 - 8:46
    Because I understand polarities,
  • 8:46 - 8:50
    I've spent my entire rabbinic career consciously,
  • 8:50 - 8:55
    embracing continuity with
    whatever part of tradition I can
  • 8:55 - 8:59
    so is not to fall into the downside of change.
  • 9:00 - 9:05
    I may not have been successful in
    growing that traditional rabbinic beard
  • 9:05 - 9:08
    but, I am deeply committed
  • 9:08 - 9:12
    both to maintaining an authentic
    continuation with the past
  • 9:12 - 9:16
    and being responsive to the present.
  • 9:16 - 9:19
    Because that's the only way
    my community will thrive
  • 9:19 - 9:21
    in the future.
  • 9:22 - 9:28
    The same rules that apply to breathing,
    to relationships and to organizational change
  • 9:28 - 9:33
    apply to any of these polarities,
    and many more.
  • 9:34 - 9:37
    But there's one more that
    I want to look with you today:
  • 9:37 - 9:40
    because its so relevant to Jerusalem
  • 9:40 - 9:44
    and also, because I believe if we could
    just manage this one better,
  • 9:44 - 9:47
    it could change the world.
  • 9:48 - 9:50
    Here's the problem:
  • 9:51 - 9:57
    How can I maintain my identity as part of
    a particular group, with a particular set
  • 9:57 - 10:00
    of believes, values and behaviors,
  • 10:00 - 10:07
    while also acknowledging my
    shared humanity with all people?
  • 10:07 - 10:11
    Each of us, belongs to particular groups,
  • 10:11 - 10:15
    national, cultural, religious, ethnic.
  • 10:15 - 10:18
    That's the particular part of who we are
  • 10:18 - 10:22
    and each of us is also part of
    something so much bigger
  • 10:22 - 10:25
    than any one group can express on its own.
  • 10:25 - 10:29
    That's the universal part of who we are.
  • 10:30 - 10:33
    Over-focusing on either one of these
  • 10:33 - 10:36
    is dangerous.
    Let me explain:
  • 10:38 - 10:41
    I grew up in the deep south
    of the United States,
  • 10:41 - 10:46
    in a town where in many ways,
    they were still fighting the civil war.
  • 10:46 - 10:50
    I'll never forget being cornered on
    the playground by a group of children
  • 10:50 - 10:56
    who threatened to beat me up if
    they ever saw me hugging my black nanny again.
  • 10:56 - 10:59
    These children had been taught
    that their particular group
  • 10:59 - 11:03
    whites, were better that everyone else.
  • 11:03 - 11:07
    And that kind of particularism is dangerous.
  • 11:09 - 11:12
    But so is the downside of the universal pole,
  • 11:12 - 11:15
    if we over-focus on our commonalities
  • 11:15 - 11:20
    we loose our distinctiveness, and
    we paper over that which makes
  • 11:20 - 11:23
    each group unique and special.
  • 11:23 - 11:27
    It's one of the dangers of
    globalization or communism.
  • 11:27 - 11:30
    They assume that we are all the same,
  • 11:30 - 11:32
    but we're not.
  • 11:32 - 11:36
    I for one, don't want to see
    a city like Jerusalem
  • 11:36 - 11:42
    loose those unique aspects
    which makes it so special.
  • 11:42 - 11:46
    I don't want to see McDonald's
    built next to the Temple Mount.
  • 11:46 - 11:50
    Instead, I want to walk through
    the streets of Jerusalem
  • 11:50 - 11:56
    and listen to the distinctive voices of
    each particular community that lives here.
  • 11:58 - 12:03
    Don't get me wrong, I love being part of
    a diverse global world,
  • 12:04 - 12:09
    but I also cherish that which makes me, me.
  • 12:09 - 12:14
    And by now, you know enough about
    polarities to realize we have to do both.
  • 12:14 - 12:21
    We have to be passionate about those things
    which make us unique and distinctive.
  • 12:22 - 12:27
    And also be open to diversity and to
    the universal values that we share.
  • 12:29 - 12:34
    I like to call this:
    "Passionate Openness"
  • 12:34 - 12:38
    and I can't think about a better place
    to work on this polarity than Jerusalem
  • 12:38 - 12:43
    because so many diverse groups live together here.
  • 12:43 - 12:46
    Just imagine, if we, here in Jerusalem
  • 12:46 - 12:49
    could demonstrate to the world what it looks like
  • 12:49 - 12:53
    to be passionate about our unique identities,
  • 12:53 - 12:59
    and also, be open to something that none of us,
    can possibly achieve on our own.
  • 13:01 - 13:04
    Now, that's a messianic vision for you.
  • 13:04 - 13:06
    And like I promised at the beginning
  • 13:06 - 13:10
    no cults, no drugs,
    no conversions necessarily.
  • 13:12 - 13:16
    Just the recognition
    that sometimes complexity
  • 13:16 - 13:22
    requires us to seek out and
    embrace both sides of a problem
  • 13:22 - 13:25
    instead of trying to solve it.
  • 13:25 - 13:29
    So next time you're faced with
    an intractable problem,
  • 13:29 - 13:33
    take a deep breath, and remember:
  • 13:33 - 13:39
    just because inhale is true,
    doesn't mean that exhale isn't also true.
  • 13:40 - 13:42
    Thank you.
  • 13:42 - 13:44
    (Applause)
Title:
The Power of Polarities - Shoshana Boyd Gelfand at TEDxJerusalem
Description:

Shoshana Boyd Gelfand is the Director of JHub, an operating programme of the London-based Pears Foundation. She received her rabbinic ordination in 1993 and has since served as Chief Executive of the UK Movement for Reform Judaism and Vice President of the Wexner Heritage Foundation in New York. She writes a monthly column for the Jewish Chronicle, and also appears regularly on BBC Radio Two Pause for Thought. Her first children's book, The Barefoot Book of Jewish Folk Tales, will be published in 2013.

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Team:
closed TED
Project:
TEDxTalks
Duration:
13:56

English subtitles

Revisions