Return to Video

Cleaning Up a Toxic Mess from the Hudson River

  • 0:04 - 0:08
    - In the 1980s, EPA
    designated a 200 mile stretch
  • 0:08 - 0:10
    of the Hudson River as
    the nation's largest
  • 0:10 - 0:13
    Superfund hazardous waste site.
  • 0:13 - 0:17
    Superfund is the nation's
    environmental law that deals
  • 0:17 - 0:21
    with the cleanup of toxic
    hazardous contamination
  • 0:21 - 0:23
    from historic pollution.
  • 0:23 - 0:25
    The Hudson River is one
  • 0:25 - 0:28
    of the largest Superfund
    sites in the country,
  • 0:28 - 0:32
    and one of the most important
    because of the thousands
  • 0:32 - 0:35
    and millions of people that are affected
  • 0:35 - 0:39
    by potential exposure to PCBs
    from fish in the Hudson River,
  • 0:41 - 0:44
    PCBs are a highly toxic chemical.
  • 0:44 - 0:47
    They've been identified
    by EPA as a probable cause
  • 0:47 - 0:48
    of cancer in humans,
  • 0:48 - 0:52
    and they've also been
    linked to illnesses such
  • 0:52 - 0:55
    as thyroid disease, immune disorders,
  • 0:55 - 0:57
    reproductive disorders, low IQ, and,
  • 0:57 - 0:59
    and other adverse health
    effects on humans.
  • 1:01 - 1:03
    General Electric dumped 1.3 million pounds
  • 1:03 - 1:07
    of PCBs into the Hudson River from 1947
  • 1:07 - 1:11
    through the 1970s when PCBs
    were banned by Congress.
  • 1:15 - 1:17
    - The fishing from,
    from Troy all the way up
  • 1:17 - 1:19
    to here in Fort Edward.
  • 1:19 - 1:23
    The health department
    has, has regulated saying
  • 1:23 - 1:25
    that you cannot keep the fish.
  • 1:25 - 1:26
    You can catch 'em and you can release 'em,
  • 1:26 - 1:28
    but you can't keep the fish,
  • 1:28 - 1:31
    nor can you eat any of
    the fish that you have due
  • 1:31 - 1:33
    to the PCB contamination.
  • 1:33 - 1:37
    Right now. One of the
    objectives of the dredging is
  • 1:37 - 1:39
    to get those fish levels down to the point
  • 1:39 - 1:41
    where you can start eating the fish again.
  • 1:42 - 1:46
    In fact, that really is the
    main source of risk exposure
  • 1:46 - 1:48
    that we, we have on the project,
  • 1:48 - 1:49
    and that's what the
    project was designed to do,
  • 1:49 - 1:51
    is reduce the levels in the fish.
  • 1:52 - 1:56
    - NRDC has been involved
    since the 1970s in working
  • 1:56 - 1:57
    towards this cleanup.
  • 1:57 - 1:58
    It's now underway.
  • 1:59 - 2:04
    We've used all the tools in
    our toolbox from litigation
  • 2:04 - 2:07
    to citizen advocacy to hard science.
  • 2:07 - 2:10
    - EPA oversees the
    general electric company
  • 2:11 - 2:14
    who is actually doing the, the
    dredging work in the river.
  • 2:14 - 2:18
    So our role is to be there,
    inspect the work, make sure
  • 2:18 - 2:21
    that it's going according to
    the plants and specifications,
  • 2:21 - 2:24
    and that they're actually
    meeting the, the standards,
  • 2:24 - 2:26
    engineering standards that
    were set for the project.
  • 2:27 - 2:29
    GEs role is to actually implement the,
  • 2:29 - 2:31
    the work itself to do the project.
  • 2:31 - 2:35
    They designed it. We reviewed
    and approved the design,
  • 2:35 - 2:37
    and they now have their
    contractors actually doing
  • 2:37 - 2:38
    the physical work in the field.
  • 2:40 - 2:43
    - The law in the US is polluter pays.
  • 2:43 - 2:44
    That means GE made a mess
  • 2:44 - 2:46
    and they're responsible to clean it up.
  • 2:46 - 2:49
    But for decades, GE spent tens of billions
  • 2:49 - 2:54
    of dollars on lawyers,
    lobbyists, scientists, pr people
  • 2:55 - 2:59
    to convince the public,
    seeking to convince the public
  • 2:59 - 3:02
    that a cleanup would
    only make things worse.
  • 3:02 - 3:03
    - Gee tried to make the argument that,
  • 3:03 - 3:06
    that you would get sufficient
    resus suspension to make it,
  • 3:06 - 3:10
    to negate some of the, the
    positive aspects of the work.
  • 3:10 - 3:13
    But what we're finding is that
    we, we don't see that level
  • 3:13 - 3:15
    of Resus suspension that becomes an issue.
  • 3:16 - 3:19
    The second phase of the project,
    which is what we're in now,
  • 3:20 - 3:22
    contains a lot of changes in
    the approach that we're taking,
  • 3:22 - 3:25
    and we find the Resus suspension
    numbers are much lower than
  • 3:25 - 3:28
    they were in the first phase,
    which was done in 2009.
  • 3:29 - 3:31
    - Initially, GE argued the PCBs weren't
  • 3:31 - 3:32
    harmful to people at all.
  • 3:33 - 3:37
    Then GE argued that the
    river was cleaning itself.
  • 3:38 - 3:40
    When the data clearly
    showed this wasn't true,
  • 3:40 - 3:42
    GE shifted ground
  • 3:42 - 3:43
    and argued that an attempt
  • 3:43 - 3:45
    to clean up the river would
    only make things worse
  • 3:45 - 3:47
    by spreading around the contamination,
  • 3:48 - 3:50
    by bringing independent science to bear.
  • 3:50 - 3:54
    And RDC was able to refute
  • 3:54 - 3:57
    and show the errors of those assertions.
  • 3:57 - 4:01
    NRDC was able to support
    in an informed way,
  • 4:01 - 4:04
    a strong comprehensive cleanup,
  • 4:04 - 4:06
    which ultimately the
    government has required in this
  • 4:06 - 4:07
    case and is now underway.
  • 4:09 - 4:11
    - Phase one of the
    project was the first year
  • 4:11 - 4:15
    of the project, and the
    purpose of that was to look at
  • 4:15 - 4:18
    the design itself, see how
    the equipment is operating,
  • 4:18 - 4:20
    are we getting the
    production that we needed?
  • 4:20 - 4:22
    Are we meeting the engineering standards
  • 4:22 - 4:25
    that was associated with the design?
  • 4:25 - 4:29
    And then after phase one,
    we had a peer review panel
  • 4:29 - 4:31
    that was put together to
    take a look at the data we
  • 4:31 - 4:32
    collected so
  • 4:32 - 4:34
    that we can make adjustments
    necessary for phase two.
  • 4:34 - 4:37
    And phase two is the remainder
    of the entire project.
  • 4:37 - 4:39
    We expect that to take anywhere from five
  • 4:39 - 4:40
    to seven years to complete.
  • 4:52 - 4:54
    As far as the dredging,
    what we do is we identify
  • 4:54 - 4:56
    where the hotspots are, that's
  • 4:56 - 4:59
    where the PCBs are the
    the most concentrated,
  • 4:59 - 5:02
    and the dredging contractor
    is, is told where to do
  • 5:02 - 5:04
    that and what depth.
  • 5:04 - 5:05
    He then removes that.
  • 5:05 - 5:07
    We go back and we re-sample it
  • 5:07 - 5:09
    and see if, if it is all gone.
  • 5:09 - 5:11
    If it isn't, we go back one more time
  • 5:11 - 5:13
    and they're only allowed to do that twice.
  • 5:13 - 5:16
    And from there we
    backfill it if it's clean
  • 5:16 - 5:19
    or we put a cap, which
    basically just covers it
  • 5:19 - 5:20
    and holds it in place so
  • 5:20 - 5:22
    that it's not coming back
    into the environment,
  • 5:26 - 5:30
    we will be dredging through
    the next five to seven seasons.
  • 5:30 - 5:34
    And of course, the dredge season
    is coincident with the time
  • 5:34 - 5:37
    that the Champlain canal is
    open since we need the Champlain
  • 5:37 - 5:40
    canal as part of the work.
  • 5:40 - 5:43
    So that means that our, our year
  • 5:43 - 5:46
    that we can actually dredge
    goes from roughly the 1st of May
  • 5:46 - 5:48
    till the end of October.
  • 5:48 - 5:51
    So we're working 24 hours a
    day, six days a week in order
  • 5:51 - 5:55
    to make up for time that we
    don't have access to the canal.
  • 5:59 - 6:01
    Thanks, Larry. How you doing?
  • 6:08 - 6:12
    - Boom.
    - That's unloading the barge
  • 6:12 - 6:14
    and it'll either put it in a,
  • 6:14 - 6:17
    a directly into a truck if it's dry enough
  • 6:17 - 6:21
    or put it through the, the
    size separation system.
  • 6:21 - 6:26
    The trauma system. What he's
    doing now is he's loading
  • 6:26 - 6:27
    up a hopper.
  • 6:28 - 6:31
    Underneath that hopper
    is a wobbler system,
  • 6:31 - 6:34
    and what that does is it processes the,
  • 6:36 - 6:37
    the material and anything four inches
  • 6:37 - 6:41
    or larger is kicked out, and
    that's taken away separately.
  • 6:41 - 6:44
    And the rest then goes up into the trauma.
  • 6:44 - 6:48
    The trauma is the blue and
    yellow piece of equipment.
  • 6:48 - 6:49
    You can see that rotating inside.
  • 6:51 - 6:54
    That's a, it's just a, a cylinder
  • 6:54 - 6:56
    that has five eighth inch diameter holes.
  • 6:56 - 6:59
    So anything smaller than
    five ace drops through it.
  • 6:59 - 7:01
    Anything larger than five ace goes
  • 7:01 - 7:03
    to the conveyor that's behind it.
  • 7:04 - 7:07
    And all of that material
    goes out on the conveyors
  • 7:07 - 7:12
    and is taken by, by truck
    up to the storage area
  • 7:12 - 7:14
    where it's then loaded onto rail carts.
  • 7:15 - 7:18
    The sludge is then pumped up to the, up
  • 7:18 - 7:19
    to the filter presses.
  • 7:19 - 7:21
    We have 12 filter presses
  • 7:21 - 7:25
    and that squeezes the water
    out of the, the slurry
  • 7:25 - 7:28
    water goes to the treatment facility
  • 7:28 - 7:31
    and the slurry gets staged
    for loading onto the rail.
  • 7:35 - 7:37
    Now, bucket he's using
    is a five yard bucket
  • 7:39 - 7:41
    with a level cut, so he
    can actually get right down
  • 7:41 - 7:43
    to the bottom of the barge and,
  • 7:43 - 7:45
    and do a good, good cleanup on the barge.
  • 7:47 - 7:49
    Once, once we're done with the dredging
  • 7:50 - 7:54
    the following season, we
    come back in, in the spring
  • 7:54 - 7:57
    and do habitat replanting.
  • 7:57 - 8:00
    What we do is we actually
    replant a portion of the area
  • 8:00 - 8:04
    that was dredged so that
    that becomes seed plants
  • 8:04 - 8:07
    to expand that weed bed again.
  • 8:07 - 8:09
    That, that we removed during the dredging.
  • 8:09 - 8:11
    The reason we put the plants back is
  • 8:11 - 8:13
    to reestablish the ecosystem
  • 8:13 - 8:15
    that was there before the dredging.
  • 8:15 - 8:17
    I mean, this is, this is
    the start of the food chain.
  • 8:17 - 8:20
    The, the plants provide
    cover for the fish to spawn.
  • 8:20 - 8:23
    They provide food stock for the fish
  • 8:23 - 8:26
    and other aquatic animals.
  • 8:26 - 8:28
    So it's, it's important
    to make sure that we get,
  • 8:28 - 8:30
    get the habitat reestablished
  • 8:30 - 8:32
    to give it a a boost, if you will.
  • 8:32 - 8:33
    It will come back on its own,
  • 8:33 - 8:35
    but this way it comes back much quicker.
  • 8:38 - 8:39
    - The start of phase two
  • 8:39 - 8:41
    of the cleanup in 2011 marks the beginning
  • 8:41 - 8:44
    of the end of a long saga.
  • 8:44 - 8:45
    It brings us closer
  • 8:45 - 8:49
    to the day when the Hudson
    River will be restored,
  • 8:50 - 8:52
    when fish will be safe to eat,
  • 8:52 - 8:54
    when communities along
    the river will be able
  • 8:54 - 8:59
    to enjoy its bounty, we'll
    be able to enjoy recreation,
  • 8:59 - 9:01
    commerce in safety
  • 9:01 - 9:04
    and health without fear of
  • 9:05 - 9:06
    poison and pollution.
  • 9:06 - 9:11
    From the legacy of PCBs,
    there's still a lot
  • 9:11 - 9:13
    of hard work left to get the job done.
  • 9:13 - 9:16
    So it's important to
    remember where we've been
  • 9:16 - 9:19
    and the challenges that still lie ahead.
  • 9:19 - 9:21
    Continued vigilance by EPA
  • 9:21 - 9:25
    and by the public will
    be crucial to ensure
  • 9:25 - 9:27
    that General Electric completes the job
  • 9:27 - 9:27
    and completes it right.
Title:
Cleaning Up a Toxic Mess from the Hudson River
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Duration:
09:37

English subtitles

Revisions