-
Do you ever wonder why we're surrounded
with things that help us do everything
-
faster and faster and faster?
-
Communicate faster,
-
but also work faster, bank faster,
-
travel faster, find a date faster,
-
cook faster, clean faster,
and do all of it all at the same time?
-
How do you feel about cramming
even more into every waking hour?
-
Well, to my generation of Americans,
-
speed feels like a birthright.
-
Sometimes I think
our minimum speed is Mach 3.
-
Anything less, and we fear
losing our competitive edge.
-
But even my generation
is starting to question
-
whether we're the masters of speed
-
or if speed is mastering us.
-
I'm an anthropologist
at the Rand Corporation,
-
and while many anthropologists
study ancient cultures,
-
I focus on modern day cultures
and how we're adapting
-
to all of this change
happening in the world.
-
Recently, I teamed up with an engineer,
Seifu Chonde, to study speed.
-
We were interested both in how people
are adapting to this age of acceleration
-
and its security and policy implications.
-
What could our world look like in 25 years
-
if the current pace of change
keeps accelerating?
-
What would it mean for transportation,
-
or learning, communication,
-
manufacturing, weaponry,
-
or even natural selection?
-
Will a faster future make us
more secure and productive?
-
Or will it make us more vulnerable?
-
In our research, people accepted
acceleration as inevitable,
-
both the thrills and the lack of control.
-
They fear that if they were to slow down,
-
they might run the risk
of becoming obsolete.
-
They say they're rather
burn out than rust out.
-
Yet, at the same time,
-
they worry that speed could
erode their cultural traditions
-
and their sense of home.
-
But even people who are winning
at the speed game
-
admit to feeling a little uneasy.
-
They see acceleration as widening
the gap between the haves,
-
the jet-setters who are buzzing around
-
and the have-nots,
-
who are left in the digital dust.
-
Yes, we have good reason to forecast
that the future will be faster,
-
but what I've come to realize
-
is that speed is paradoxical,
-
and like all good paradoxes,
-
it teaches us about the human experience,
-
as absurd and complex as it is.
-
The first paradox is that we love speed,
-
and we're thrilled by its intensity.
-
But our prehistoric brains
aren't really built for it,
-
so we invent roller coasters
and race cars and supersonic planes,
-
but we get whiplash, carsick,
-
jet-lagged.
-
We didn't evolve to multitask.
-
Rather, we evolved to do one thing
with incredible focus,
-
like hunt -- not necessarily
with great speed,
-
but with endurance for great distance.
-
But now there's a widening gap
between our biology and our lifestyles,
-
a mismatch between what our bodies are
built for and what we're making them do.
-
It's a phenomenon my mentors have called
"Stone Agers in the fast lane."
-
(Laughter)
-
A second paradox of speed is that
it can be measured objectively. Right?
-
Miles per hour, gigabytes per second.
-
But how speed feels,
-
and whether we like it,
-
is highly subjective.
-
So we can document
-
that the pace at which we are adopting
new technologies is increasing.
-
For example, it took 85 years
from the introduction of the telephone
-
to when the majority of Americans
had phones at home.
-
In contrast, it only took 13 years
for most of us to have smartphones.
-
And how people act and react to speed
-
varies by culture and among
different people within the same culture.
-
Interactions that could be seen
as pleasantly brisk and convenient
-
in some cultures
-
could be seen as horribly rude in others.
-
I mean, you wouldn't go asking
for a to-go cup at a Japanese tea ceremony
-
so you could jet off
to your next tourist stop.
-
Would you?
-
A third paradox
is that speed begets speed.
-
The faster I respond,
the more responses I get,
-
the faster I have to respond again.
-
Having more communication
-
and information at our fingertips
-
at any given moment
-
was supposed to make decision-making
easier and more rational.
-
But that doesn't really
seem to be happening.
-
Here's just one more paradox:
-
If all of these faster technologies
were supposed to free us from drudgery,
-
why do we all feel so pressed for time?
-
Why are we crashing our cars
in record numbers
-
because we think we have
to answer that text right away?
-
Shouldn't life in the fast lane
feel a little more fun
-
and a little less anxious?
-
German speakers even have a word for this:
-
"Eilkrankheit."
-
In English, that's "hurry sickness."
-
When we have to make fast decisions,
-
autopilot brain kicks in,
-
and we rely on our learned behaviors,
-
our reflexes, our cognitive biases,
-
to help us perceive and respond quickly.
-
Sometimes that saves our lives, right?
-
Fight or flight.
-
But sometimes, it leads us astray
in the long run.
-
Oftentimes, when our society
has major failures,
-
they're not technological failures.
-
They're failures that happen
when we made decisions too quickly
-
on autopilot.
-
We didn't do the creative
or critical thinking required
-
to connect the dots
-
or weed out false information
-
or make sense of complexity.
-
That kind of thinking can't be done fast.
-
That's slow thinking.
-
Two psychologists,
Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky,
-
started pointing this out back in 1974,
-
and we're still struggling
to do something with their insights.
-
All of modern history can be thought of as
one spurt of acceleration after another.
-
It's as if we think
if we just speed up enough,
-
we can outrun our problems.
-
But we never do.
-
We know this in our own lives,
-
and policymakers know it, too.
-
So now we're turning
to artificial intelligence
-
to help us make faster
and smarter decisions
-
to process this ever-expanding
universe of data.
-
But machines crunching data
are no substitute
-
for critical and sustained thinking
-
by humans,
-
whose Stone Age brains need a little time
to let their impulses subside,
-
to slow the mind
-
and let the thoughts flow.
-
If you're starting to think
that we should just hit the brakes,
-
that won't always be the right solution.
-
We all know that a train that's going
too fast around a bend can derail,
-
but Seifu, the engineer,
-
taught me that a train that's going
too slowly around a bend can also derail.
-
So managing this spurt of acceleration
starts with the understanding
-
that we have more control over speed
than we think we do,
-
individually and as a society.
-
Sometimes, we'll need to engineer
ourselves to go faster.
-
We'll want to solve gridlock,
-
speed up disaster relief
for hurricane victims
-
or use 3-D printing to produce
what we need on the spot,
-
just when we need it.
-
Sometimes, though, we'll want
to make our surroundings feel slower,
-
to engineer the crash
out of the speedy experience.
-
And it's OK not to be
stimulated all the time.
-
It's good for adults
-
and for kids.
-
Maybe it's boring,
but it gives us time to reflect.
-
Slow time is not wasted time.
-
And we need to reconsider
what it means to save time.
-
Culture and rituals around the world
build in slowness,
-
because slowness helps us reinforce
our shared values and connect.
-
And connection is
a critical part of being human.
-
We need to master speed,
-
and that means thinking carefully about
the trade-offs of any given technology.
-
Will it help you reclaim time that you
can use to express your humanity?
-
Will it give you hurry sickness?
Will it give other people hurry sickness?
-
If you're lucky enough to decide the pace
that you want to travel through life,
-
it's a privilege.
-
Use it.
-
You might decide that you need
both to speed up
-
and to create slow time:
-
time to reflect,
-
to percolate
-
at your own pace;
-
time to listen,
-
to empathize,
-
to rest your mind,
-
to linger at the dinner table.
-
So as we zoom into the future,
-
let's consider setting
the technologies of speed,
-
the purpose of speed
-
and our expectations of speed
-
to a more human pace.
-
Thank you.
-
(Applause)