-
Not Synced
Black holes are among the most
destructive objects in the universe.
-
Not Synced
Anything that gets too close to the
central singularity of a black hole,
-
Not Synced
be it an asteroid, planet, or star,
-
Not Synced
risks being torn apart by its
extreme gravitational field.
-
Not Synced
And if the approaching object happens
to cross the black hole’s event horizon,
-
Not Synced
it’ll disappear and never re-emerge,
-
Not Synced
adding to the black hole’s mass and
expanding its radius in the process.
-
Not Synced
There is nothing we could throw
at a black hole
-
Not Synced
that would do the least bit of
damage to it.
-
Not Synced
Even another black hole won’t destroy it–
-
Not Synced
the two will simply merge into a larger
black hole,
-
Not Synced
releasing a bit of energy as gravitational
waves in the process.
-
Not Synced
By some accounts,
-
Not Synced
it’s possible that the universe may
eventually consist entirely of black holes
-
Not Synced
in a very distant future.
-
Not Synced
And yet, there may be a way to destroy,
or “evaporate,” these objects after all.
-
Not Synced
If the theory is true,
-
Not Synced
all we need to do is to wait.
-
Not Synced
In 1974,
-
Not Synced
Stephen Hawking theorized a process
-
Not Synced
that could lead a black hole
to gradually lose mass.
-
Not Synced
Hawking radiation, as it came to be known,
-
Not Synced
is based on a well-established phenomenon
called quantum fluctuations of the vacuum.
-
Not Synced
According to quantum mechanics,
-
Not Synced
a given point in spacetime fluctuates
between multiple possible energy states.
-
Not Synced
These fluctuations are driven by the
continuous creation and destruction
-
Not Synced
of virtual particle pairs,
-
Not Synced
which consist of a particle and its
oppositely charged antiparticle.
-
Not Synced
Normally, the two collide and annihilate
each other shortly after appearing,
-
Not Synced
preserving the total energy.
-
Not Synced
But what happens when they appear just at
the edge of a black hole’s event horizon?
-
Not Synced
If they’re positioned just right,
-
Not Synced
one of the particles could escape the
black hole’s pull
-
Not Synced
while its counterpart falls in.
-
Not Synced
It would then annihilate another
oppositely charged particle
-
Not Synced
within the event horizon
of the black hole,
-
Not Synced
reducing the black hole’s mass.
-
Not Synced
Meanwhile, to an outside observer,
-
Not Synced
it would look like the black hole
had emitted the escaped particle.
-
Not Synced
Thus, unless a black hole continues
to absorb additional matter and energy,
-
Not Synced
it’ll evaporate particle by particle,
at an excruciatingly slow rate.
-
Not Synced
How slow?
-
Not Synced
A branch of physics, called black hole
thermodynamics, gives us an answer.
-
Not Synced
When everyday objects or celestial bodies
release energy to their environment,
-
Not Synced
we perceive that as heat,
-
Not Synced
and can use their energy emission to
measure their temperature.
-
Not Synced
Black hole thermodynamics suggests
-
Not Synced
that we can similarly define the
“temperature” of a black hole.
-
Not Synced
It theorizes that the more massive the
black hole,
-
Not Synced
the lower its temperature.
-
Not Synced
The universe’s largest black holes would
give off temperatures
-
Not Synced
of the order of 10^-17 Kelvin,
-
Not Synced
very close to absolute zero.
-
Not Synced
Meanwhile, a small black hole with the
mass of the asteroid Vesta
-
Not Synced
would have a temperature close to 200
degrees Celsius,
-
Not Synced
thus releasing a lot of energy
in the form of Hawking Radiation
-
Not Synced
to the cold outside environment.
-
Not Synced
The smaller the black hole,
-
Not Synced
the hotter it seems to be burning–
-
Not Synced
and the sooner it’ll burn out completely.
-
Not Synced
Just how soon?
-
Not Synced
Well, don’t hold your breath.
-
Not Synced
First of all, most black holes accrete,
or absorb matter and energy,
-
Not Synced
more quickly than they emit
Hawking radiation.
-
Not Synced
But even if a black hole with the
mass of our Sun stopped accreting,
-
Not Synced
it would take 10 to the 67th power years–
-
Not Synced
many many magnitudes longer than the
current age of the Universe—
-
Not Synced
to fully evaporate.
-
Not Synced
When a black hole reaches
about 230 metric tons,
-
Not Synced
it’ll have only one more second to live.
-
Not Synced
In that final second,
-
Not Synced
its event horizon becomes
increasingly tiny,
-
Not Synced
until finally releasing all its energy
back into the universe.
-
Not Synced
And while Hawking radiation has never
been directly observed,
-
Not Synced
some scientists believe that certain gamma
ray flashes detected in the sky
-
Not Synced
are actually traces of the last
moments of small,
-
Not Synced
primordial black holes formed
at the dawn of time.
-
Not Synced
Eventually, in an almost inconceivably
distant future,
-
Not Synced
the universe may be left
as a cold and dark place.
-
Not Synced
But if Stephen Hawking was right,
-
Not Synced
before that happens,
-
Not Synced
the normally terrifying and otherwise
impervious black holes
-
Not Synced
will end their existence in a final
blaze of glory.