-
Not Synced
Let's imagine a sculptor
building a statue,
-
Not Synced
just chipping away with his chisel.
-
Not Synced
Michelangelo had this elegant way
of describing it when he said,
-
Not Synced
"Every block of stone
has a statue inside of it,
-
Not Synced
and it's the task
of the sculptor to discover it."
-
Not Synced
But what if he worked
in the opposite direction?
-
Not Synced
Not from a solid block of stone,
-
Not Synced
but from a pile of dust,
-
Not Synced
somehow gluing millions of these particles
together to form a statue.
-
Not Synced
I know that's an absurd notion --
-
Not Synced
It's probably impossible.
-
Not Synced
The only way you get a statue from a pile
of dust is if the statue built itself --
-
Not Synced
if somehow we could compel millions
of these particles to come together
-
Not Synced
to form the statue.
-
Not Synced
Now, as odd as that sounds,
-
Not Synced
that is almost exactly the problem
I work on in my lab.
-
Not Synced
I don't build with stone,
-
Not Synced
I build with nanomaterials.
-
Not Synced
They're these just impossibly small,
fascinating little object.
-
Not Synced
They're so small that if this controller
was a nanoparticle,
-
Not Synced
a human hair would be the size
of this entire room.
-
Not Synced
And they're at the heart of a field
we call nanotechnology,
-
Not Synced
which I'm sure we've all heard about,
-
Not Synced
and we've all heard about how
it is going to change everything.
-
Not Synced
You know, when I was a graduate student,
-
Not Synced
it was one of the most exciting
times to be working in nanotechnology.
-
Not Synced
There were scientific breakthroughs
happening all the time.
-
Not Synced
The conferences were buzzing,
-
Not Synced
there was tons of money
pouring in from funding agencies.
-
Not Synced
And the reason is,
-
Not Synced
when objects get really small,
-
Not Synced
they're governed by a different set
of physics that govern ordinary objects,
-
Not Synced
like the ones we interact with.
-
Not Synced
We call this physics quantum mechanics.
-
Not Synced
And what is tells you is that you
can precisely tune their behavior
-
Not Synced
just by making seemingly
small changes to them,
-
Not Synced
like adding or removing
a handful of atoms,
-
Not Synced
or twisting the material.
-
Not Synced
It's like this ultimate toolkit.
-
Not Synced
You really felt empowered;
-
Not Synced
you felt like you could make anything.
-
Not Synced
And we were doing it,
-
Not Synced
and by we I mean my whole
generation of graduate students.
-
Not Synced
We were trying to make blazing-fast
computers using nanomaterials.
-
Not Synced
We were constructing quantum dots
-
Not Synced
that could one day go in your body
and find and fight disease.
-
Not Synced
There were even groups
trying to make and elevator to space
-
Not Synced
using carbon nanotubes.
-
Not Synced
You can look that up,
-
Not Synced
it's true.
-
Not Synced
Anyways, we thought it was
going to effect all parts
-
Not Synced
of science and technology,
-
Not Synced
from computing to medicine.
-
Not Synced
And I have to admit,
-
Not Synced
I drank all of the Kool-Aid.
-
Not Synced
I mean, every last drop.
-
Not Synced
But that was 15 years ago,
-
Not Synced
and --
-
Not Synced
so fantastic science was done,
-
Not Synced
really important work.
-
Not Synced
We've learned a lot.
-
Not Synced
We were never able to translate
that science into new technologies --
-
Not Synced
into technologies that could
actually impact people.
-
Not Synced
And the reason is,
-
Not Synced
these nanomaterials --
-
Not Synced
they're like a double-edged sword.
-
Not Synced
The same thing that makes
them so interesting --
-
Not Synced
they're small size --
-
Not Synced
also makes them impossible to work with.
-
Not Synced
It's literally like trying to build
a statue out of a pile of dust.
-
Not Synced
And we just don't have the tools
that are small enough to work with them.
-
Not Synced
But even if we did,
-
Not Synced
it wouldn't really matter,
-
Not Synced
because we couldn't one-by-one
place millions of particles together
-
Not Synced
to build a techonology.
-
Not Synced
So because of that,
-
Not Synced
all of the promise
-
Not Synced
and all of the excitement
-
Not Synced
has remained just that:
-
Not Synced
promise and excitement.
-
Not Synced
We don't have any
disease-fighting nanobots,
-
Not Synced
there's no elevators to space,
-
Not Synced
and the thing that I'm most interested in,
-
Not Synced
no new types of computing.
-
Not Synced
Now that last one,
-
Not Synced
that's a really important one.
-
Not Synced
We just have come to expect
-
Not Synced
the pace of computing advancements
to go on indefinitely.
-
Not Synced
We've built entire economies on this idea.
-
Not Synced
And this pace exists
because of our ability
-
Not Synced
to pack more and more devices
onto a computer chip.
-
Not Synced
And as those devices get smaller,
-
Not Synced
they get faster,
-
Not Synced
they consume less power
-
Not Synced
and they get cheaper.
-
Not Synced
And it's this convergence that gives us
this incredible pace.
-
Not Synced
As an example:
-
Not Synced
if I took the room-sized computer
that sent three men to the moon and back,
-
Not Synced
and somehow compressed it --
-
Not Synced
compressed the world's
greatest computer of its day --
-
Not Synced
so it's the same size as your smartphone,
-
Not Synced
your actualy smartphone,
-
Not Synced
that thing you spent 300 bucks on
and just toss out every two years,
-
Not Synced
would blow this thing away.
-
Not Synced
Like, you would not be impressed.
-
Not Synced
It couldn't do anything
that your smartphone does.
-
Not Synced
it would be slow,
-
Not Synced
you couldn't put any of your stuff on it,
-
Not Synced
you could possibly get through
the first two minutes
-
Not Synced
of a "Walking Dead" episode
if you're lucky --
-
Not Synced
(Laughter)
-
Not Synced
The point is,
-
Not Synced
the progress is not gradual.
-
Not Synced
The progress is relentless;
-
Not Synced
it's exponential,
-
Not Synced
it compounds on itself
year after year,
-
Not Synced
to the point where
if you compare a technology
-
Not Synced
from one generation to the next,
-
Not Synced
they're almost unrecognizable.
-
Not Synced
And we owe it to ourselves
to keep this progress going.
-
Not Synced
We want to say the same thing
10, 20, 30 years from now:
-
Not Synced
look what we've done
over the last 30 years.
-
Not Synced
Yet we know this progress
may not last forever.
-
Not Synced
In fact, the party's kind of winding down.
-
Not Synced
It's like "last call for alcohol," right?
-
Not Synced
If you look under the covers,
-
Not Synced
by many metrics like
speed and performance,
-
Not Synced
the progress has already slowed to a halt.
-
Not Synced
So if we want to keep this party going,
-
Not Synced
we have to do what we've always
been able to do,
-
Not Synced
and that is to innovate.