The potential of embyronic treatments to fight cancer | Hashem Al-Ghaili | TEDxCluj
-
0:13 - 0:15Fifty years ago,
-
0:16 - 0:19humanity began the war against cancer.
-
0:20 - 0:22When the war against cancer began,
-
0:22 - 0:27we were relying on chemotherapy
as the main treatment for cancer. -
0:27 - 0:29Now, almost fifty years later,
-
0:30 - 0:34we are still relying on chemotherapy
as the main treatment for cancer. -
0:35 - 0:37What is going on?
-
0:37 - 0:40Because we have spent
billions of dollars on cancer research, -
0:40 - 0:47and yet we don't seem to see
the productive results of this investment. -
0:48 - 0:53We are still relying on chemotherapy,
radiotherapy, and surgery -
0:53 - 0:58as the main treatments against cancer
despite spending billions of dollars -
0:58 - 1:02and despite all the many years
that have passed. -
1:03 - 1:06So what is going on with cancer research?
-
1:06 - 1:10Is it possible that we
don't want to treat cancer? -
1:11 - 1:12That would be absurd.
-
1:12 - 1:18Is it possible that we are approaching
cancer research the wrong way? -
1:19 - 1:24Luckily, the number
of cancer survivors is on the rise. -
1:24 - 1:28But we still haven't won
the war against cancer. -
1:30 - 1:35Scientists are now working on
the second generation of cancer treatment. -
1:35 - 1:41The ones that are supposed to replace
chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. -
1:41 - 1:45In fact, two of these treatments
were approved last year. -
1:46 - 1:49One is called immunotherapy,
-
1:49 - 1:52and the second one is called gene therapy.
-
1:53 - 1:55Now immunotherapy works like this:
-
1:55 - 1:58You take immune cells
from a cancer patient; -
1:58 - 2:00these are called T cells.
-
2:01 - 2:02You send them to a lab
-
2:02 - 2:06where they are genetically
engineered to fight cancer. -
2:06 - 2:09Then you inject them into the patient.
-
2:09 - 2:13Three months later,
and the patient is cancer-free. -
2:14 - 2:19As exciting as it sounds,
many people and many scientists believe -
2:19 - 2:22that immunotherapy is the future
of cancer treatment. -
2:23 - 2:24But I don't think so.
-
2:24 - 2:26There are three problems,
-
2:26 - 2:28actually four problems
with this treatment. -
2:29 - 2:33The first problem is that so far,
it only works against one type of cancer -
2:33 - 2:35which is called lymphoblastic leukemia.
-
2:36 - 2:39And we all know that we have too many
types of cancers to deal with: -
2:39 - 2:43breast cancer, brain cancer, skin cancer,
-
2:43 - 2:44and the list goes on.
-
2:45 - 2:47The second problem with this treatment
-
2:47 - 2:52is that it only works on people
who are younger than 25 years old. -
2:52 - 2:55And we all know that cancer
can strike at any age. -
2:56 - 2:58The third problem,
-
2:58 - 3:01actually with the two treatments
that were approved last year, -
3:01 - 3:05is that they are extremely expensive.
-
3:05 - 3:10The cost of immunotherapy is $475,000.
-
3:11 - 3:15And that's not the telephone number
of your health insurance company. -
3:16 - 3:19Actually, that's the cost
of only treating one patient -
3:19 - 3:22against only one type of cancer.
-
3:22 - 3:26What is it about cancer treatments
that makes them so expensive? -
3:28 - 3:32Why? Why do people
have to sell an organ to treat another? -
3:32 - 3:35It is a devastating future
that we are heading to -
3:35 - 3:37unless we do something.
-
3:38 - 3:43So what we really need
is a cancer treatment that is efficient, -
3:44 - 3:46that works for the long run,
-
3:46 - 3:49and that is available when you need it.
-
3:49 - 3:52Now, the other problem
with these treatments -
3:52 - 3:57is that by the time they are
cheap enough for you to afford, -
3:57 - 3:59they won't be efficient.
-
3:59 - 4:01It's going to take many years
-
4:01 - 4:05before somebody from the middle class
can afford immunotherapy. -
4:05 - 4:07And by then, it won't be efficient,
-
4:07 - 4:10because cancer cells tomorrow
will not respond -
4:10 - 4:13to the same treatment
they way they do today. -
4:13 - 4:17So we need something
that also works for the long run. -
4:18 - 4:25Now, what if I told you
that instead of wasting $475,000 -
4:25 - 4:29on treating only one patient
against only one type of cancer, -
4:29 - 4:34we could, at the same cost,
prevent almost all types of cancer -
4:35 - 4:37in 15 individuals.
-
4:39 - 4:43The human body is equipped
with a natural defense mechanism -
4:43 - 4:45which protects us against cancer.
-
4:45 - 4:48And it's working in your body right now.
-
4:48 - 4:51It is called DNA repair mechanism.
-
4:51 - 4:53When DNA makes copies of itself,
-
4:54 - 4:57there are chances of errors
called mutations. -
4:58 - 5:00And these mutations can be accelerated
-
5:00 - 5:04when you expose yourself
to chemicals, radiation, -
5:04 - 5:06when you adopt unhealthy lifestyles,
-
5:07 - 5:10and sometimes family history
and genetics also play a role. -
5:11 - 5:14But there are proteins that are tasked
-
5:14 - 5:18with repairing these mutations
as soon as they happen. -
5:19 - 5:23And this is happening
in your cells right now. -
5:23 - 5:29So what if there is a way by which
we could enhance the cell's ability -
5:29 - 5:33to repair DNA at a maximum efficiency.
-
5:33 - 5:35In fact, we could do that.
-
5:35 - 5:40We know which proteins are involved
in the DNA repair mechanism, -
5:40 - 5:42and we know how to control them
-
5:42 - 5:46with the help of a gene editing
technique called CRISPR, -
5:46 - 5:49which you have heard about in the news.
-
5:50 - 5:53CRISPR is the most precise
gene editing technique -
5:53 - 5:55ever invented in human history.
-
5:55 - 5:58And it is proving to be very efficient.
-
5:58 - 6:01So we could use this technique
to enhance the cell's ability -
6:01 - 6:06to repair its DNA
at all times, at all costs. -
6:08 - 6:10But there is one problem.
-
6:10 - 6:12If we want to protect you
against all types of cancers, -
6:13 - 6:14then we have to make sure
-
6:14 - 6:16that your entire body
is genetically engineered, -
6:16 - 6:21that every cell is
programmed to resist cancer. -
6:21 - 6:24But we can't do it in adult humans,
-
6:24 - 6:27because your body
consists of 37 trillion cells, -
6:27 - 6:30and that is impossible to engineer.
-
6:30 - 6:34In fact, there isn't any technology
or gene delivery technique -
6:34 - 6:39that can deliver genes
to this massive number of cells. -
6:39 - 6:45But what if we could do it
with human embryos instead? -
6:45 - 6:46Why?
-
6:46 - 6:49Because human embryos
only have eight cells -
6:49 - 6:52in the third day after fertilization.
-
6:52 - 6:54And we can manage,
-
6:54 - 6:59in fact, we can engineer
eight cells in human embryos. -
6:59 - 7:02In fact, we are
already doing it right now. -
7:02 - 7:04Take a look at these remarkable results.
-
7:04 - 7:07Scientists genetically
engineer human embryos. -
7:07 - 7:09They manage to correct a mutation
-
7:09 - 7:14responsible for a serious
heart condition in human embryos. -
7:14 - 7:19They also manage to treat a condition
responsible for a blood disorder. -
7:20 - 7:22What's more amazing, also,
-
7:22 - 7:26they manage to introduce
HIV resistance to human embryos. -
7:27 - 7:28So technically speaking,
-
7:28 - 7:33if these embryos were allowed
to develop into adult humans, -
7:34 - 7:39then the chances of getting
HIV infection in these humans -
7:39 - 7:41are so slim they may never happen.
-
7:42 - 7:46So if we can do it with these diseases
by engineering human embryos, -
7:46 - 7:49then we can also do it with cancer.
-
7:49 - 7:53And it is called embryonic cancer therapy,
-
7:54 - 7:58which I believe could be
the ultimate cure for cancer. -
7:59 - 8:02What's beautiful about
embryonic cancer therapy -
8:02 - 8:06is that we only have to engineer
eight cells in human embryos. -
8:07 - 8:09These embryos will grow to be adult humans
-
8:09 - 8:13with 37 trillion
genetically engineered cells. -
8:14 - 8:18And we only have to do it once
with one generation. -
8:18 - 8:22Because future generations
will already, by default, -
8:22 - 8:25get this genetic change as we pass it on.
-
8:26 - 8:28So they will pass it on
to the next generation. -
8:30 - 8:33What's also beautiful about this treatment
is that it's cost efficient. -
8:34 - 8:36We are already doing
part of the treatment. -
8:36 - 8:38You know about in-vitro fertilization:
-
8:39 - 8:41you take sperms, eggs,
you fuse them in the lab, -
8:41 - 8:44you create embryos,
and you implant them. -
8:44 - 8:47This is a procedure
for people who can't conceive. -
8:48 - 8:52So, it's very much the same procedure,
-
8:53 - 8:55except that we are adding
one additional step, -
8:55 - 8:57which is genetic engineering.
-
8:57 - 9:01We are engineering the human embryo
before implantation. -
9:02 - 9:09And the cost is really not so much -
I mean, in comparison to $475,000. -
9:09 - 9:13The cost of in-vitro fertilization
is not more than $15,000. -
9:13 - 9:16In fact, you can get it cheaper
in some countries. -
9:16 - 9:20And the cost of genetically
engineering human embryos -
9:20 - 9:22is also not more than $10,000.
-
9:22 - 9:27In fact, you can buy
a CRISPR kit for $1,500, -
9:27 - 9:30and you can use it
to engineer at least 100 embryos. -
9:32 - 9:35Think of the possibilities here.
-
9:35 - 9:41Yes, maybe we have to rely on
in-vitro fertilization at the beginning, -
9:41 - 9:44but eventually, we will find a way
-
9:44 - 9:49by which we could engineer the embryos
right on the spot, inside the body. -
9:51 - 9:52Now, there are many ways
-
9:52 - 9:56by which we can enhance
human embryos to fight cancer. -
9:56 - 10:00We can tweak molecular processes.
-
10:01 - 10:03We have a great deal of knowledge
-
10:03 - 10:05about the molecules
that are involved with cancer, -
10:06 - 10:09and we could manipulate them
long before birth. -
10:10 - 10:13We could also manipulate human cells.
-
10:14 - 10:19And instead of immunotherapy after birth,
we could do it before birth. -
10:19 - 10:21What's more fascinating is
-
10:22 - 10:25we could adopt certain traits
from other creatures. -
10:25 - 10:30Now, you have heard of the tardigrades,
the toughest animals on earth. -
10:31 - 10:32Tardigrades:
-
10:32 - 10:36they can survive in space radiation,
in the vacuum of space; -
10:36 - 10:38they can survive extreme radiation;
-
10:38 - 10:45they can turn into glass,
under dehydrated conditions. -
10:46 - 10:49But what's fascinating
is that they can survive -
10:49 - 10:51extreme radiations
which could cause cancer in humans. -
10:52 - 10:55What scientists did is
they studied what causes this. -
10:55 - 10:58Why are they protected against radiation?
-
10:58 - 11:01And they found a gene
responsible for that. -
11:01 - 11:05They took that gene
and added it to human cells. -
11:05 - 11:09Now you have a human cell
but with a gene from another creature. -
11:10 - 11:14They took these engineered cells
and exposed them to UV radiation, -
11:14 - 11:16and what happened?
-
11:16 - 11:20The immune cells
were resistant to radiation. -
11:20 - 11:22They gained 40% resistance.
-
11:23 - 11:24So we could acquire this trait.
-
11:24 - 11:27We could add it to human embryos,
-
11:28 - 11:33which would definitely
be helpful against cancer. -
11:33 - 11:36And there are many other creatures
that have incredible super strength -
11:36 - 11:39which we could also add
to the human genome. -
11:40 - 11:43Now let's imagine a future
-
11:43 - 11:48where we have eradicated cancer,
and it no longer exists. -
11:48 - 11:53Do you know how much money
we spend on cancer medication? -
11:53 - 11:59In 2015, the world spent
107 billion dollars on cancer medication. -
12:00 - 12:06By 2020 it is expected to be
150 billion dollars. -
12:06 - 12:09And that is just on cancer medication.
-
12:09 - 12:13There are still billions of dollars
that are spent on cancer research. -
12:15 - 12:18We are flooding a lot of money
into cancer research, -
12:18 - 12:22and we are ignoring other diseases
that are also as important: -
12:22 - 12:27Alzheimer's, multiple sclerosis,
heart failure, spinal cord injuries, -
12:27 - 12:29and the list goes on and on.
-
12:29 - 12:34These diseases also kill people.
They make them terminally ill as well. -
12:34 - 12:38And if we just keep flooding
all the resources that we have -
12:38 - 12:40into cancer research,
-
12:40 - 12:43then we are not heading
into the right future. -
12:44 - 12:47So, imagine a world
-
12:47 - 12:52where we don't have to spend that money
on cancer research anymore. -
12:52 - 12:54Cancer has been eradicated.
-
12:54 - 12:57Everybody is born
with a built-in mechanism -
12:57 - 12:59that protects them against cancer.
-
13:00 - 13:04We can now use that money
to study other diseases -
13:04 - 13:06and learn about their genetics.
-
13:06 - 13:11And in a few short years, we will use
what we learned about their genetics -
13:12 - 13:15to apply the same technique
and treat them. -
13:15 - 13:19So this will be our gate
not only to treating cancer -
13:19 - 13:22but also other diseases.
-
13:22 - 13:26If we have the knowledge
and the technology -
13:26 - 13:31to do something as remarkable as this,
then what is stopping us? -
13:32 - 13:35Well, there are a number of challenges
that we have to overcome -
13:35 - 13:38before we can make this a reality.
-
13:38 - 13:41The first challenge is bioethics.
-
13:42 - 13:45As I said, we're working
with embryos here. -
13:46 - 13:48And most of the countries, now,
-
13:48 - 13:50do not allow research on human embryos
-
13:51 - 13:52beyond 14 days.
-
13:53 - 13:57So after 14 days,
the human embryos are destroyed. -
13:57 - 13:59They are not allowed
for scientific research. -
13:59 - 14:04So how are we supposed to understand
the potential of this treatment -
14:04 - 14:08if we aren't less strict with the rules?
-
14:09 - 14:11The problem with bioethics
-
14:11 - 14:16is that the rules that we established
against scientific research do not change. -
14:16 - 14:19Science and technology continue to evolve,
-
14:19 - 14:23but the rules that we established
50 years ago do not change; -
14:23 - 14:25we don't revisit them.
-
14:25 - 14:27And that is a big problem.
-
14:27 - 14:29And this is why I believe
-
14:29 - 14:32that the rule of 14 days
on embryonic therapy -
14:33 - 14:34should be revisited,
-
14:34 - 14:36we should discuss it more,
-
14:36 - 14:38and we should be less strict
-
14:38 - 14:41so we can understand the potential
of embryonic treatment. -
14:42 - 14:45We will unlock unlimited potential
of such treatment -
14:45 - 14:48if we become less strict with the rules.
-
14:49 - 14:52The second challenge is business interest.
-
14:54 - 14:57It's quite clear that cancer
is a stable source of income. -
14:57 - 15:00It's a problem, and as long as
the problem exists, -
15:00 - 15:04some people will continue
to profit from it. -
15:05 - 15:08And it is those people who invest
their money in cancer research. -
15:08 - 15:12So why would they invest it
into the area of research -
15:12 - 15:15that could eradicate cancer
once and for all? -
15:16 - 15:19So that is a big problem.
Business interest. -
15:19 - 15:21If we eradicated cancer,
-
15:21 - 15:24we're going to destroy
many business interests -
15:24 - 15:28for companies and individuals
who profit from the condition. -
15:29 - 15:32But luckily, part of the money
that is spent on cancer research -
15:32 - 15:35also comes from
public funding: governments. -
15:35 - 15:37Where do they get their money?
-
15:37 - 15:40From you, the taxpayer.
-
15:40 - 15:43Part of your money
goes to cancer research. -
15:43 - 15:45And we have control over that.
-
15:46 - 15:51So if we spend that money
on new areas of cancer research, -
15:52 - 15:54then we might be onto something,
-
15:54 - 16:00instead of having the monopoly
of only focusing on the same areas. -
16:00 - 16:04As I said, for almost 50 years,
we haven't seen remarkable progress. -
16:06 - 16:10The last challenge is public awareness.
-
16:11 - 16:17Now, the problem with society today
is that we keep our minds shut. -
16:17 - 16:21We're not open-minded when it comes
to a new revolution in technology. -
16:22 - 16:24We just don't accept it -
-
16:24 - 16:27even if we haven't learned
a great deal about it, -
16:27 - 16:30even if we didn't educate ourselves.
-
16:30 - 16:32And that is a big problem.
-
16:32 - 16:38You have seen in online forums,
the rise of ignorance, -
16:39 - 16:40comments,
-
16:41 - 16:46and people who are objecting
scientific knowledge, rise of technology -
16:46 - 16:48simply because
they don't understand it, -
16:48 - 16:52simply because they don't learn about it,
-
16:52 - 16:57or maybe we're not doing a good job
of educating them. -
16:58 - 16:59So it's very important
-
16:59 - 17:03for people to keep open minds
towards technology and science. -
17:03 - 17:09Learn more about these available options
before saying yes or no. -
17:09 - 17:13And it is your responsibility,
since you know about this now, -
17:13 - 17:16to bring this discussion
to other people who don't know about it. -
17:17 - 17:19More people will know.
-
17:19 - 17:23We can influence the decision makers
to break the rule of 14 days -
17:23 - 17:26so scientists can now study embryos,
-
17:26 - 17:30we can unlock the potential
of embryonic treatments, -
17:31 - 17:33and we can defeat cancer.
-
17:35 - 17:39The applications of science are endless,
-
17:40 - 17:42and the possibilities are limitless,
-
17:42 - 17:44and the choice is only ours now.
-
17:45 - 17:51Either to keep cancer as a friend
by embracing ignorance and greed, -
17:51 - 17:54or defeat our enemy once and for all
-
17:55 - 17:58by embracing selflessness
and rational thinking. -
17:59 - 18:00Thank you.
-
18:00 - 18:03(Applause)
- Title:
- The potential of embyronic treatments to fight cancer | Hashem Al-Ghaili | TEDxCluj
- Description:
-
Embryonic cancer treatment. It can treat all types of cancer. It is affordable. Can you imagine that?
Hashem Al-Ghaili is a science communicator who was born in Yemen. He runs his Facebook page, which has over 25 million fans. He graduated from Jacobs University Bremen and obtained his master’s degree in Molecular Biotechnology. According to Tubular labs, his Facebook is among the fastest growing pages in Germany that also generates the highest number of monthly views.
This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at https://www.ted.com/tedx
- Video Language:
- English
- Team:
- closed TED
- Project:
- TEDxTalks
- Duration:
- 18:13