< Return to Video

vimeo.com/.../435170434

  • 0:01 - 0:05
    So hi, I'm Katherine Blakemoore
    I'm the former Executive Director
  • 0:05 - 0:09
    of Disability Rights California, which is
  • 0:09 - 0:13
    the agency established under federal law
    as California's
  • 0:13 - 0:16
    protection and advocacy system.
  • 0:16 - 0:19
    Our mandate is to assist people
    with disabilities and
  • 0:19 - 0:25
    protect their civil rights through a variety
    of advocacy efforts.
  • 0:25 - 0:30
    Um, and I had the really good fortune
    of working at Disability Rights California
  • 0:30 - 0:35
    or other similar organizations
    for about 40 years
  • 0:35 - 0:39
    both as a lawyer representing people
    and protecting their civil rights
  • 0:39 - 0:42
    and their educational rights
    and their housing rights, um
  • 0:42 - 0:44
    and then most recently
    as the Executive Director.
  • 0:44 - 0:51
    So the ADA to me is really
    based on the foundations of other
  • 0:51 - 0:54
    really important statutes and
    those include the
  • 0:54 - 0:59
    Individuals with Disabilities Education Act,
    Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
  • 0:59 - 1:04
    and both of those laws helped ensure
    inclusion and end discrimination
  • 1:05 - 1:11
    So when I was a very young lawyer in 1977,
    I did a lot of work in the area of education
  • 1:12 - 1:19
    and one of the very first cases I worked
    on was representing a child, Jeremy
  • 1:19 - 1:24
    who was in 1st grade and in the summer
    he'd been crossing a street with his family
  • 1:24 - 1:30
    and unfortunately was hit by a car
    and became quadriplegic as a result of that
  • 1:30 - 1:34
    and when his mother went to enroll him
    in school for the next school year,
  • 1:34 - 1:38
    she was told that because of
    his disability, he could not
  • 1:38 - 1:42
    return to his neighborhood school.
    and instead would need to go to
  • 1:42 - 1:46
    a segregated
    special education program
  • 1:46 - 1:48
    because that's where students
    with disabilities went
  • 1:48 - 1:51
    and his parents contacted us
    and we agreed to take the case
  • 1:51 - 1:55
    because that discrimination of saying
  • 1:55 - 1:59
    you couldn't be with your neighborhood
    peers was just fundamentally wrong
  • 1:59 - 2:05
    and contrary to the very foundations of
    the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
  • 2:05 - 2:09
    so we represented him in he hearing,
    we went to court.
  • 2:09 - 2:14
    When we went to court, I think
    one of the most important things
  • 2:14 - 2:19
    to me, was numbers of his classmates and
    their parents came to court with us
  • 2:19 - 2:26
    and the students, 1st and 2nd graders,
    um, clearly enjoyed being with Jeremy
  • 2:26 - 2:31
    but also more importantly,
    talked to the news media that was there
  • 2:31 - 2:34
    about how they couldn't understand why
    Jeremy couldn't attend school with them
  • 2:34 - 2:39
    and how important it was that their friend
    be able to go to school
  • 2:39 - 2:44
    and participate with them
    just like he had in the years before.
  • 2:44 - 2:49
    So that case to me, just represented
    the fist opportunity to really
  • 2:49 - 2:53
    challenge a discriminatory practice and
    ensure that Jeremy could attend
  • 2:53 - 2:57
    his neighborhood school and be included
    with his friends.
  • 2:58 - 3:03
    So I think the first "aha" moment
    of the ADA was our ability
  • 3:04 - 3:09
    to use the ADA and to discuss
    the United States Supreme Court decision
  • 3:09 - 3:15
    called the "Olmstead Case" which said
    that people with disabilities could not be
  • 3:16 - 3:21
    unnecessarily segregated in insititutions
    and one of the most powerful ways we use
  • 3:21 - 3:29
    the ADA and that case holding was to
    challenge the budget cuts
  • 3:29 - 3:33
    that were proposed when California
    was deep in an economic recession in 2008
  • 3:33 - 3:39
    and 2009. The state made the decision
    that what it was going to do is
  • 3:40 - 3:43
    significantly reduce community-based
    supports like the
  • 3:43 - 3:46
    in-home supportive services program and
  • 3:46 - 3:51
    our lawyers in
    Disability Rights California
  • 3:51 - 3:57
    decided that that violated the ADA and
    would result in people needing to move
  • 3:57 - 4:01
    into institutions, contrary to the
    Olmstead Decision
  • 4:01 - 4:05
    So twice we went into federal court.
    Twice we were successful
  • 4:05 - 4:11
    with the court holding that
    the ADA prohibited the state
  • 4:11 - 4:16
    from making decisions that would result in
    the unnecessary institutionalization
  • 4:16 - 4:23
    of people. So the ADA is an
    extraordinarily powerful tool to
  • 4:23 - 4:27
    protect people's civil rights and one
    that we need to continue to use today.
  • 4:28 - 4:34
    So I think what we've learned um
    in the last few months is that
  • 4:35 - 4:41
    there is always room for us to
    continue to use the ADA as a tool
  • 4:41 - 4:47
    to push further and the pandemic really
    reminds us of the high risk that
  • 4:47 - 4:51
    people with disabilities,
    particularly those living in segregated
  • 4:51 - 4:58
    and isolated settings like nursing homes
    face. COVID, which disproportionately
  • 4:59 - 5:04
    affected nursing home residents
    and it's in part because of the congregate
  • 5:04 - 5:09
    setting that they live in and the
    vulnerability of people with disabilities
  • 5:09 - 5:12
    to this particular disease.
  • 5:12 - 5:18
    And so as we think about reopening
    California and moving forward,
  • 5:18 - 5:23
    we have to really remember the
    importance of the ADA in saying
  • 5:23 - 5:26
    that people need to live in the community.
  • 5:26 - 5:28
    They need to be included.
  • 5:28 - 5:32
    We have to be mindful of how do we
    accommodate the needs of people with
  • 5:32 - 5:35
    disabilities as part of our reopening.
  • 5:35 - 5:40
    How do we redesign service systems so that
    we no longer think of nursing homes as
  • 5:40 - 5:46
    a primary place where people with
    disabilities or seniors should be living
  • 5:46 - 5:52
    How do we ensure that people with
    disabilities, when they are participating
  • 5:52 - 5:58
    in activities of the day aren't placed
    in isolated day kinds of programs
  • 5:59 - 6:04
    but instead given opportunities to
    interact in the larger community
  • 6:05 - 6:08
    So lots of work in that area to be done.
  • 6:08 - 6:15
    I think the other part that's important
    is to use this moment to
  • 6:15 - 6:19
    engage in intersectional civil rights
    advocacy.
  • 6:19 - 6:25
    There's lots of energy now to looking
    at issues of discrimination affecting
  • 6:25 - 6:29
    black and brown people who are
    also more disproportionately impacted
  • 6:29 - 6:34
    by the pandemic and to use this as an
    opportunity to come together as
  • 6:34 - 6:40
    a larger civil rights community
    to advance inclusion, integration,
  • 6:40 -
    nondiscrimination for all people
    including those with disabilities.
Title:
vimeo.com/.../435170434
Video Language:
English
Team:
ABILITY Magazine
Duration:
06:45
briellesummerhays edited English subtitles for vimeo.com/.../435170434
Mariam-Solimaan edited English subtitles for vimeo.com/.../435170434
Jennifer Schwartz edited English subtitles for vimeo.com/.../435170434
Jennifer Schwartz edited English subtitles for vimeo.com/.../435170434

English subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions