< Return to Video

The Universe Is, Like, Seriously Huge (33c3)

  • 0:00 - 0:15
    33C3 preroll music
  • 0:15 - 0:21
    Herald Angel: Okay, our next speaker is
    Michael Büker. He is a science
  • 0:21 - 0:27
    communicator and an astrophysicist. He is
    also a science journalist and a writer.
  • 0:27 - 0:35
    So, he's currently living in Dresden and
    he wrapped his mind around this very
  • 0:35 - 0:42
    question so how do you measure these great
    distances and how do you get an idea of
  • 0:42 - 0:50
    how huge the cosmos really is, since the
    universe is like seriously huge.
  • 0:50 - 0:52
    Michael, your stage.
  • 0:52 - 0:59
    applause
  • 0:59 - 1:02
    Michael: Okay, thank you very much. Thank
    you everyone for being here.
  • 1:02 - 1:08
    While after the kind of year that we've had it's
    natural to be thinking about where and how
  • 1:08 - 1:13
    fast you might be able to get away from
    earth. So let's all be a little bit like
  • 1:13 - 1:17
    Maddie was a couple of months ago, when
    she thought that actually the Voyager
  • 1:17 - 1:22
    probe is winning, because it's quite far
    away and we're gonna be talking about even
  • 1:22 - 1:27
    larger distances. But, to think about
    distances in the universe and how we can
  • 1:27 - 1:31
    measure them and how we can determine how
    far away stuff is from each other, it all
  • 1:31 - 1:36
    starts when we look at the sky, because
    when we look up at the sky all we see is
  • 1:36 - 1:40
    basically moving dots. This is a nice
    picture that shows the very large
  • 1:40 - 1:46
    telescope and above it there is the moon,
    Venus, and the planet Jupiter shining.
  • 1:46 - 1:50
    And these will be moving across the sky in a
    way that we are familiar with, but if they
  • 1:50 - 1:55
    are just moving at the sky and every night
    the pattern repeats, how can we find out
  • 1:55 - 1:59
    about the distances, how far these are
    away from us, from anywhere else and we
  • 1:59 - 2:04
    are gonna be looking at, actually, how
    that works. Even in antiquity, this sketch
  • 2:04 - 2:10
    is from 200 years before the common era,
    so it's more then 2200 years old now, the
  • 2:10 - 2:16
    answer was clever geometry. If you measure
    exactly at what point on our sky stuff
  • 2:16 - 2:20
    appears at certain times instead of just
    saying, well, it's somewhere up there and
  • 2:20 - 2:24
    later it's gonna be like over there. If
    you do this precisely, you can get a grasp
  • 2:24 - 2:29
    at where stuff is and how far away it is
    from us and relative to each other.
  • 2:29 - 2:33
    There was a small break in progress in this, because
  • 2:33 - 2:34
    laughter
  • 2:34 - 2:38
    for a time people chose to believe
    that actually the earth was at the center
  • 2:38 - 2:42
    of the solar system and then none of your
    measurement make any sense So, okay, we
  • 2:42 - 2:49
    kind of wasted 1000 years on that
    question. But then in the 1600s there came
  • 2:49 - 2:54
    a very important breakthrough, actually 2
    of them, first was Johannes Kepler, who
  • 2:54 - 2:59
    found out that the way that planets move
    around the sun, including the earth,
  • 2:59 - 3:03
    follows a very specific mathematical
    pattern and then this was comprehensively
  • 3:03 - 3:09
    explained by Isaac Newton when he formulated
    the general laws of gravitation and how they
  • 3:09 - 3:15
    work. So it was found out that these all
    follow a certain law and from this you can
  • 3:15 - 3:21
    determine the distances relative to each
    other. So they were able to tell how much
  • 3:21 - 3:27
    exactly further away from the sun is the
    average orbit of Mars than earth. So, we
  • 3:27 - 3:33
    had a relative idea of how far away stuff
    is from the sun, but we didn't know what
  • 3:33 - 3:37
    the exact value was. So, if during the
    17th century you were to ask an
  • 3:37 - 3:41
    astronomer, how far away is Jupiter from
    the sun, he would say, about five times as
  • 3:41 - 3:46
    much as the earth, but then if you ask him
    but how much is that in miles or whatever,
  • 3:46 - 3:51
    they wouldn't be able to tell you. So with
    this one measurement, if we measured this
  • 3:51 - 3:55
    AU, which stands for astronomical unit,
    which we just conveniently define to say
  • 3:55 - 3:59
    well, the average orbit the earth has
    around the sun is 1 astronomical unit, if
  • 3:59 - 4:04
    we found out that one value, we would be
    able to determine all the distances of all
  • 4:04 - 4:10
    the planets in the solar system from the
    sun. And again, the answer was clever
  • 4:10 - 4:16
    geometry. In a way that I'm not going to
    go into in much detail, when the planet
  • 4:16 - 4:21
    Venus transits the star, we saw transits
    in an earlier talk, is when a planet moves
  • 4:21 - 4:26
    in front of a star and kind of blocks the
    light from it a little bit. If you time
  • 4:26 - 4:30
    this exactly and measure exactly the way
    that it moves from different points on the
  • 4:30 - 4:35
    earth, this gives you a clue. But, there
    is a big problem, is that transits of
  • 4:35 - 4:41
    Venus as seen from the earth come in pairs
    8 years apart - which is okay - but that only
  • 4:41 - 4:47
    happens every 120 years So, the very first
    one that was really observed was in 1639,
  • 4:47 - 4:52
    but that was basically just one guy in
    England in his backyard and he didn't
  • 4:52 - 4:56
    really have colleagues, he didn't have
    good equipment and anything. So the number
  • 4:56 - 5:01
    that he found was not very precise. Then
    astronomers spent, after Kepler and Newton
  • 5:01 - 5:05
    had made their discoveries, astronomers
    spent decades preparing, they set up
  • 5:05 - 5:08
    telescopes in different places in the
    earth, they coordinated, they wrote
  • 5:08 - 5:12
    letters to each other. But they were
    trolled by how they didn't really
  • 5:12 - 5:17
    understand how their telescopes worked
    very well. So then astronomers said, okay
  • 5:17 - 5:21
    that didn't really work out. We're gonna
    doing it real well in 120 years.
  • 5:21 - 5:22
    laughter
  • 5:22 - 5:25
    So again they coordinated extremely well
    the telescopes have gotten much better
  • 5:25 - 5:29
    they distributed around the earth, which
    was easier due to railways, well you
  • 5:29 - 5:33
    couldn't fly, but there was, you know,
    there was the railways and everything, so
  • 5:33 - 5:36
    communication and transportation was a
    little easier and they distributed all
  • 5:36 - 5:41
    around the earth and they did this again
    in the 1870s and 1880s and they were
  • 5:41 - 5:45
    trolled by how their clocks were not
    precise enough. So, because the
  • 5:45 - 5:49
    comparative measurements were off by as
    much as a minute in time they didn't get a
  • 5:49 - 5:55
    value as exact as they were hoping for. I
    mean, here we see 149 million km and then
  • 5:55 - 5:59
    there is an uncertainty of 160.000 it's
    not so bad. Actually in astronomy that's
  • 5:59 - 6:04
    pretty amazing for accuracy, but it's not
    enough if you're trying to send stuff to
  • 6:04 - 6:11
    Venus. So they were probably hoping for
    the early 2000s to really finally find the
  • 6:11 - 6:16
    true distance, the true value of the
    astronomical unit, but then before that
  • 6:16 - 6:23
    something else happened. So, in the 1960s
    big radio transmitters, radio antennas,
  • 6:23 - 6:29
    became good enough to actually beam a
    radio signal at the planet Venus and then
  • 6:29 - 6:34
    wait and measure how long it takes to
    bounce back. So we did a radar ranging
  • 6:34 - 6:39
    experiment to the planet Venus and that
    gave a value for this astronomical unit
  • 6:39 - 6:45
    that was good enough to actually build
    probes that would fly to Venus. And then
  • 6:45 - 6:48
    if you have something there which is not
    just a wave bouncing off of the planet,
  • 6:48 - 6:52
    but you actually have a spacecraft there
    you can pretty much exactly time all the
  • 6:52 - 6:56
    transmissions from the antenna on the
    spacecraft and everything and that's how
  • 6:56 - 7:01
    we found that value. So from this, we
    know, and this is actually the defined
  • 7:01 - 7:05
    value, so it doesn't change anymore, we
    just said that this is the astronomical
  • 7:05 - 7:08
    unit, and we know that very well, and this
    helps us to establish all the distances in
  • 7:08 - 7:14
    the solar system. Still, the transit of
    Venus that happened in 2004 and 2012, it
  • 7:14 - 7:19
    just gave us amazing pictures like these,
    taken in Greece in 2004 or this one taken
  • 7:19 - 7:24
    from a Japanese space probe in 2012. Now,
    if you weren't around to witness those,
  • 7:24 - 7:30
    well, next one is up in 2120 or something.
    So, just wait around.
  • 7:30 - 7:32
    laughter
  • 7:32 - 7:37
    Now, as we moved towards the stars, so we
    basically covered the solar system, but we
  • 7:37 - 7:40
    also wanna know how far away are the
    stars, which is the next logical step, if
  • 7:40 - 7:43
    we are looking outwards in the universe we
    have to talk about the concept of
  • 7:43 - 7:49
    parallax. And it's a bit complicated, it
    involves geometry, but we can cover it
  • 7:49 - 7:55
    sort of in a way of the layout of this
    Saal. So if there was somewhere, someone
  • 7:55 - 8:00
    up there on the Rang of Saal 1 and they
    were looking straight at the stage and see
  • 8:00 - 8:05
    me here and walking from one side of the
    Saal to the other, then first I would be
  • 8:05 - 8:08
    appearing like a little to the left of
    their field of vision, if they were
  • 8:08 - 8:14
    looking straight ahead, with their nose
    pointed at the screen. And then as they
  • 8:14 - 8:17
    move to the other side of the Saal I would
    appear in the other direction and there
  • 8:17 - 8:22
    would be an angle which corresponds to how
    far they moved. And if they precisely
  • 8:22 - 8:27
    measured this angle and how far they moved
    they can calculate the distance towards
  • 8:27 - 8:33
    me. Now, in this Saal that would mean
    about 40 meters and it would be a parallax
  • 8:33 - 8:37
    angle of about 10 to 20 degrees and that
    would then give you the information that
  • 8:37 - 8:44
    from up there I'm probably about 50 meters
    away. We can do that with the stars. Now,
  • 8:44 - 8:46
    on earth we can move from one place on
    the earth to the other, but that's
  • 8:46 - 8:50
    actually a small baseline that doesn't
    give us an angle that's a lot of fun to
  • 8:50 - 8:57
    work with. But luckily, since earth moves
    around the sun all time for free, we can
  • 8:57 - 9:03
    just use that and measure the position of
    a star, wait 6 months, and measure it
  • 9:03 - 9:07
    again. And we will be at a totally
    different place, well basically 300
  • 9:07 - 9:12
    million km away and we can use that as a
    baseline for this measurement. So we look
  • 9:12 - 9:17
    at a star, we wait half a year, we look at
    the same star, and precisely measure how
  • 9:17 - 9:25
    much the star wobbles. Unfortunately, this
    leads us to the definition of the distance
  • 9:25 - 9:31
    unit of the parsec, and the parsec is a
    unit of distance. Please do not confuse it
  • 9:31 - 9:38
    with other stuff as some might do. So how
    is the parsec defined? Well, if we have
  • 9:38 - 9:42
    this angle, I told you that from Saal 1,
    from there to there it might be something
  • 9:42 - 9:48
    like 10 to 20 degrees. If a star is a
    parsec away then over the course of a
  • 9:48 - 9:53
    year over our geometrical baseline of the
    earth moving around the sun, 300 million
  • 9:53 - 9:58
    km apart in the 2 points, it will have to
    be the angle of an arcsecond. Now what is
  • 9:58 - 10:04
    an arcsecond? It's just an extremely
    small angle. You have a full circle
  • 10:04 - 10:11
    divided into 360 degrees, then each of
    these degrees is divided into 60 minutes,
  • 10:11 - 10:16
    and then each of these minutes is divided
    into 60 arcseconds. An we're looking at
  • 10:16 - 10:22
    an angle of 1 arc second that these stars
    would over the course of 1 year be
  • 10:22 - 10:27
    wobbling in the sky from our movement
    around the sun. Let's take an example of
  • 10:27 - 10:30
    looking at the international space station
    from down on the ground. You might have
  • 10:30 - 10:34
    seen this, it's actually quite fun to see,
    you can look it up on websites at what
  • 10:34 - 10:38
    point in time the international space
    station will be above you. And the angle
  • 10:38 - 10:43
    of one arc second would be the size of an
    astronaut floating next to the
  • 10:43 - 10:47
    international space station as you're
    looking at it from the ground. Obviously,
  • 10:47 - 10:52
    you can't see an astronaut from the ground
    that's because our eyes can't pick out
  • 10:52 - 10:56
    the angle that is one arcsecond. Another
    example might be, again for someone way up
  • 10:56 - 11:02
    there at the end of Saal 1, looking at me at
    a distance of about 50 meters, the angle of one
  • 11:02 - 11:07
    arcsecond would be the width of one the
    hairs of my beard. And if you could see
  • 11:07 - 11:12
    that you would have a detector that is
    capable of distinguishing one arcsecond.
  • 11:12 - 11:16
    Now, if we do that, and if we manage to do
    that, the telescopes are actually good
  • 11:16 - 11:21
    enough to do this, one parsec is the
    distance to a star that wobbles by
  • 11:21 - 11:26
    1 arcsecond. But, actually, our closest
    neighbor is even further away. So, we
  • 11:26 - 11:33
    don't have any star that does that. 1.3
    parsecs is the distance to Proxima
  • 11:33 - 11:39
    Centauri, and the Alpha and Beta Centauri
    system, so these are even smaller. And
  • 11:39 - 11:46
    270.000 astronomical units is the distance
    to that one, so that means it's way
  • 11:46 - 11:53
    further away. I mean, in the solar system
    we can move 2, 3, 5, maybe 10, 20, 30
  • 11:53 - 11:56
    astronomical units if we are doing well
    with our rockets and it takes a bunch of
  • 11:56 - 12:02
    years, but to cover 1000s or even 100s of
    1000s of astronomical units tells us that
  • 12:02 - 12:06
    the propulsion systems and the rockets that
    we have today are not capable of getting us
  • 12:06 - 12:10
    to the stars in the way we do it right
    now, which we also heard, of course, in
  • 12:10 - 12:15
    the talks before. Telescopes on the ground
    are nice, but actually telescopes in space
  • 12:15 - 12:21
    can give us an even better resolution. And
    the Hipparcos satellite, which was active
  • 12:21 - 12:27
    in the last couple of decades, measured up
    to 2 milliarcseconds. Now think of it. The
  • 12:27 - 12:32
    arcsecond with the astronaut in the sky
    and my beard and stuff. A 1/1000 of that
  • 12:32 - 12:36
    as an angular resolution is what the
    Hipparcos satellite was able to measure
  • 12:36 - 12:40
    and this gave us the distances to
    basically all the stars in our field of
  • 12:40 - 12:47
    view that were up to 100 parsecs away. And
    we know exactly how far these are away.
  • 12:47 - 12:52
    The Gaia satellite, which is now just
    coming into operation, commissioned by the
  • 12:52 - 12:57
    European space agency, this is about to
    have an even better performance, it will
  • 12:57 - 13:01
    look at a billion stars, that's what it's
    called, the Billion Stars Surveyor, it
  • 13:01 - 13:06
    will be good for distances of up to 5000
    parsecs and it's gonna tell us the
  • 13:06 - 13:11
    distances to all these stars, it's gonna
    be an amazing step in looking at how far
  • 13:11 - 13:18
    away the stars are and forming a map of
    all the stars around us. And, there is
  • 13:18 - 13:22
    something missing? No. Let's talk about
    standard candles now, because that's
  • 13:22 - 13:26
    another important tool apart from the
    geometry that we saw before. A standard
  • 13:26 - 13:31
    candle is just something where you know
    exactly how bright it is. And then you can
  • 13:31 - 13:37
    calculate how far away. A standard candle
    would be, well, like any, let's image a
  • 13:37 - 13:42
    set of candles and all of them burn at the
    same brightness. So if you measured the
  • 13:42 - 13:48
    brightness of one of these candles, you
    could tell how far apart it was. Actually,
  • 13:48 - 13:53
    maybe a better picture is streetlights in
    the night. If you see a car coming towards
  • 13:53 - 13:57
    you, you can kind of estimate by how
    brightly you see the light if the car is
  • 13:57 - 14:01
    still far away, or if it is close to you,
    because you have an intuitive
  • 14:01 - 14:06
    understanding of how bright the lights of
    a car should be if it is right next to you
  • 14:06 - 14:11
    or a couple of 100 meters away or many
    kilometers away, if it's a clear night.
  • 14:11 - 14:16
    And so we want standard candles in space.
    We want stuff in space, where we have a
  • 14:16 - 14:20
    good idea of how bright it should be. And
    then from how bright we see it, how much
  • 14:20 - 14:26
    of the light actually reaches us, we can
    calculate the distance. And this we can do
  • 14:26 - 14:30
    with the help of these, one of the most
    important diagrams and all of
  • 14:30 - 14:34
    astrophysics, which is the
    Hertzsprung-Russel diagram. It basically
  • 14:34 - 14:40
    sorts stars by their colors and by how bright
    they are. And because of the way that stars
  • 14:40 - 14:45
    work, the color and the brightness are
    also intermittently connected to their
  • 14:45 - 14:50
    mass and what's happening inside the stars
    and then if we see a bunch of stars, we
  • 14:50 - 14:55
    can do this very well with clusters, which
    are groups of 10s or 100s up to 1000s of
  • 14:55 - 15:00
    stars in one place, at basically the same
    distance, and they have sort of a standard
  • 15:00 - 15:05
    population, then we can estimate how far
    away they're. Let's think of it like this,
  • 15:05 - 15:08
    we jut had the picture of the car and the
    night, which was light, but let's think of
  • 15:08 - 15:13
    it as sound. Think of groups of children
    in maybe preschool and let's imagine that
  • 15:13 - 15:20
    every preschool group of children always
    had 20 children in it, just because. And
  • 15:20 - 15:25
    now, you can estimate how loud 20
    preschool children just playing around actually
  • 15:25 - 15:29
    are and from the sound of when you hear
    the children you can tell how far away
  • 15:29 - 15:32
    that group is from you. If we have a group
    of stars and we know the light, the
  • 15:32 - 15:38
    different colors that they have, we can
    actually match it to this graph and see
  • 15:38 - 15:45
    how far away this group is by estimating
    the properties that they have in this way.
  • 15:45 - 15:50
    And so this then gives us an overview of
    basically our galactic neighborhood, so
  • 15:50 - 15:56
    the other stars in our galaxy. The number
    of stars in our galaxy is about 200 billion,
  • 15:56 - 16:00
    but before I bombard you with
    more numbers, we have a chance to get a
  • 16:00 - 16:06
    great overview of what that's like from
    the artists of Monty Python.
  • 16:08 - 16:14
    Song: Just remember that you standing
    on a planet that's evolving,
  • 16:14 - 16:17
    revolving at 900
    miles an hour.
  • 16:21 - 16:22
    Michael: Sorry.
  • 18:10 - 18:18
    applause
  • 18:18 - 18:24
    Thank you Monty Python. Now, the numbers
    that they present have changed over time.
  • 18:24 - 18:28
    Now scientists speak of 200 billion stars
    in the galaxy instead of 100 billion, but
  • 18:28 - 18:32
    still it gives you an amazingly good overall
    idea. And whenever I try to think of the
  • 18:32 - 18:36
    parameters of the milky way galaxy, like
    100.000 light-years side to side, I just
  • 18:36 - 18:42
    have the song in my head. And it works
    amazingly well. Except also for the one
  • 18:42 - 18:45
    part where it says that the universe is
    expanding at the speed of light, like we
  • 18:45 - 18:49
    heard in the talk before, that's not
    actually true. The expansion of the
  • 18:49 - 18:52
    universe actually exceeds the speed of
    light, but common, they are comedians, so.
  • 18:52 - 18:53
    laughing
  • 18:53 - 18:58
    Cut them a little slack on that one. Other
    galaxies, the milky way galaxy that we
  • 18:58 - 19:02
    have just gotten this nice overview over
    is by far not the only one, there are
  • 19:02 - 19:06
    other galaxies and we are part of groups
    of galaxies, actually the one that's
  • 19:06 - 19:11
    called the local group, which has 3 very
    large galaxies, which is ours, the milky
  • 19:11 - 19:16
    way, the Andromeda galaxy, which is
    actually larger, and another one which is
  • 19:16 - 19:20
    a bit smaller. And then there's a bunch of
    dwarf galaxies also moving around there
  • 19:20 - 19:25
    and we gonna be looking at how we find
    about distances in that regard. Now again,
  • 19:25 - 19:30
    we have a sort of standard candle here,
    and these are stars called Cepheids, and
  • 19:30 - 19:34
    what you see here is the brightness of the
    star pulsating. So you look at the star
  • 19:34 - 19:37
    and you say, okay it's this bright, oh no
    wait, it's dimmer again, oh wait, it's
  • 19:37 - 19:41
    getting brighter again, over the course of
    a couple days. And if you measure this
  • 19:41 - 19:44
    brightness very precisely, you just have
    to wait a few days, it's not a difficult
  • 19:44 - 19:52
    measurement in that regard, you can find
    out that the duration of these variations
  • 19:52 - 19:58
    is actually closely linked to how bright
    they are. So, calculating or measuring the
  • 19:58 - 20:02
    period of these oscillations gives you the
    brightness and then these stars, called
  • 20:02 - 20:08
    Cepheids, can work for you as a standard
    candle and this works out into other
  • 20:08 - 20:12
    galaxies. So, we look at like the
    Andromeda galaxy, which is a couple of
  • 20:12 - 20:16
    million light-years away, and we see a
    Cepheids star in there somewhere, we
  • 20:16 - 20:21
    measure the period of it's oscillations
    and then we can tell how far apart it is
  • 20:21 - 20:26
    and this gives us a good idea of how away
    that galaxy actually is. That doesn't work
  • 20:26 - 20:31
    for galaxies where they appear so small in
    our field of view that we can't point out
  • 20:31 - 20:40
    a single Cepheid star. So these groups of
    galaxies also form together into something
  • 20:40 - 20:44
    called Superclusters. And the Virgo
    Supercluster is an idea of what our group
  • 20:44 - 20:49
    is actually in. So I mentioned the local
    group of a couple of maybe 100 dwarf
  • 20:49 - 20:55
    galaxies and three large ones. And this is
    actually orbiting something called the
  • 20:55 - 21:03
    Virgo cluster. So we are a bit out, but I
    mean this is an abstract graphic. What
  • 21:03 - 21:07
    does it look like to look at the Virgo
    cluster? Well, We can look at that. And
  • 21:07 - 21:11
    you see that we look at the sky and
    there's just a bunch of large galaxies
  • 21:11 - 21:16
    there. You're looking at something that's
    probably pretty similar to what our own
  • 21:16 - 21:20
    galaxy is like, and it's just hanging
    there in the sky. And by, for example,
  • 21:20 - 21:25
    this Cepheid measurement method, we can
    get an idea of how far away it is. But these
  • 21:25 - 21:32
    local galaxies are not the only ones we
    see. There is an example that's called the
  • 21:32 - 21:36
    Hubble Extreme Deep Field, where the
    Hubble space telescope, that's orbiting the
  • 21:36 - 21:40
    earth, took pictures of a very small patch
    of the sky. Here, the moon is shown to
  • 21:40 - 21:45
    scale. So, if you look at the moon, the
    photograph that I'm about to show you
  • 21:45 - 21:50
    right now, shows this small part that's
    marked by the XDF. And if you look at it
  • 21:50 - 21:55
    long enough and collect a lot of light,
    that's why it's called a Deep Field, it
  • 21:55 - 21:59
    actually looks like this. And there's a
    huge amount of galaxies and they all look
  • 21:59 - 22:04
    different. Some are spiral galaxies, some
    are elliptical galaxies, and they even
  • 22:04 - 22:08
    have different colors. Some appear red,
    some appear blue, and this all has to do
  • 22:08 - 22:13
    with the way that they evolve and we not
    even done quite in understanding how they
  • 22:13 - 22:18
    come to look like that. You can actually
    help with this. There are so many galaxies
  • 22:18 - 22:23
    just recorded in pictures that we don't
    have good catalogs of them all. So you can
  • 22:23 - 22:28
    visit galaxyzoo.org and they will show you
    a picture of a galaxy somewhat like this
  • 22:28 - 22:33
    and you have to click, is it a spiral
    galaxy, is it an elliptical galaxy. Does
  • 22:33 - 22:36
    it look like blue color, does it look like
    red color. It's crowdsourced citizen
  • 22:36 - 22:41
    science and you can help classify a whole
    bunch of galaxies, and it's a lot of fun,
  • 22:41 - 22:44
    just click through while
    you should be working.
  • 22:44 - 22:51
    laughterapplause
  • 22:51 - 22:55
    Now, also when we look at these galaxies,
    similar to the way we can look at stars
  • 22:55 - 22:59
    with the Cepheids and their variation,
    there is a bunch of methods I'm not going
  • 22:59 - 23:04
    to get into a lot of detail, but if you
    look at galaxies and the way they move and
  • 23:04 - 23:07
    the way that the light emanates from
    them, and someway you can correlate that
  • 23:07 - 23:12
    to the distance, and so examining these
    galaxies very closely can give us an idea
  • 23:12 - 23:17
    of how far away they are from us. But
    actually everyone's favorite standard
  • 23:17 - 23:22
    candle, the one thing that astronomers and
    astrophysicists really love to use, is
  • 23:22 - 23:27
    supernovae of the 1a type. Now in the talk
    before we saw that sometimes little white
  • 23:27 - 23:32
    dwarf stars can gain mass from their
    companion stars, so stuff is falling onto
  • 23:32 - 23:36
    them, until the mass of the white dwarf
    star that's gaining weight becomes so
  • 23:36 - 23:40
    large that it explodes in a thermal
    nuclear explosion and this then is a
  • 23:40 - 23:45
    supernova of type A. And what's amazing
    about these explosions is that basically
  • 23:45 - 23:50
    they are almost the same brightness. Or
    you can determine the brightness very well
  • 23:50 - 23:57
    if you look at how quickly the light fades
    out. So, whenever we see, like you see
  • 23:57 - 24:01
    here on the top-left picture, whenever we
    see a galaxy and there is a supernova 1a
  • 24:01 - 24:05
    happening right at that moment, and they
    only are visible for a couple of days
  • 24:05 - 24:09
    mostly, hours to days. So if we look at
    that closely and we measure how the light
  • 24:09 - 24:17
    fades away, then we can get a very good
    idea of how far away that galaxy is. And
  • 24:17 - 24:22
    even larger structures emerge then, and we
    think about the Virgo Supercluster that I
  • 24:22 - 24:28
    just showed you, which was groups of
    galaxies around groups of other galaxies
  • 24:28 - 24:32
    and the latest idea of the sort of the
    large scale structure that the earth and
  • 24:32 - 24:38
    our milky way is part of, is the Laniakea
    Supercluster that was proposed just 2 or 3
  • 24:38 - 24:43
    years ago. And here you don't even see
    individual galaxies. It's more like the
  • 24:43 - 24:49
    density of stuff in the universe that's
    grouped together. And you see these lines,
  • 24:49 - 24:55
    they represent sort of the way that
    gravity is pulling everything. And yeah,
  • 24:55 - 24:59
    that's a pretty amazing idea. And like
    we've heard in the talk before, the
  • 24:59 - 25:02
    universe is expanding and this also
    affects the light, the light gets
  • 25:02 - 25:07
    redshifted. If there is a lightwave
    traveling through the universe, and while
  • 25:07 - 25:12
    it's traveling space expands, that also
    means that the light changes it's
  • 25:12 - 25:17
    wavelength. It just becomes a different
    color. And it shifts towards the red,
  • 25:17 - 25:22
    which is why this thing is called
    redshift. And so galaxies that are very
  • 25:22 - 25:27
    far away, because between us and where
    that galaxy is space is expanding and has
  • 25:27 - 25:32
    been expanding for a while, these galaxies
    appear to look red. And we can actually see
  • 25:32 - 25:37
    that in the pictures, like this one. Yeah,
    you can see it on the screen, it's this
  • 25:37 - 25:41
    very faint red dot, and that actually
    tells us that this is a galaxy which
  • 25:41 - 25:45
    should actually have blue light, like most
    of the other galaxies, but because it's so
  • 25:45 - 25:50
    far away and space has stretched while the
    lightwaves were traveling in our direction
  • 25:50 - 25:55
    it now appears red. And 4 gigaparsecs, so
    we're looking at 4 billion parsecs of
  • 25:55 - 26:00
    distance towards this, which we can kind
    of extrapolate of how far it's redshifted,
  • 26:00 - 26:07
    so how far the light has been reddened, is
    how we can get an idea of this. And it's
  • 26:07 - 26:10
    not just the one, this, at least a couple
    of years ago, was the furthest away galaxy
  • 26:10 - 26:15
    that had ever been observed, but actually
    there's a whole bunch of those and they
  • 26:15 - 26:19
    are everywhere, and like we saw there is a
    very large number of galaxies to be seen
  • 26:19 - 26:24
    everywhere. And to give us a final idea of
    how matter is really distributed in the
  • 26:24 - 26:30
    universe, I have another video which is a
    simulation of how these super galaxy
  • 26:30 - 26:40
    clusters are actually distributed. So let
    me pull that up. Now we're looking at some
  • 26:40 - 26:45
    generic super galaxy cluster and we're
    kind of circling it. And as the camera is
  • 26:45 - 26:51
    moving out and the picture is getting
    larger, we see that this one super galaxy
  • 26:51 - 26:56
    cluster is actually sort of connected to
    other regions where there is a high
  • 26:56 - 27:01
    density of galaxies. Remember, this is not
    stars, we're looking at galaxies. And they
  • 27:01 - 27:05
    are sort of strung together in something
    that's called filaments. And these
  • 27:05 - 27:10
    filaments stretch along the lines of
    regions where there is almost no galaxies
  • 27:10 - 27:15
    which are called voids, and these voids
    are between 10 and 50 million light-years
  • 27:15 - 27:20
    in diameter, more or less. And this is
    just the way that everything stretches
  • 27:20 - 27:27
    out. So, super galaxy clusters are
    gathered in filaments around voids and it
  • 27:27 - 27:32
    looks like a sort of a soap bubble or
    maybe a bee hive structure. And okay, this
  • 27:32 - 27:39
    is a simulation, it looks nice, and this is
    gathered from data that we have about how
  • 27:39 - 27:44
    far away these galaxies are, how we think the
    universe evolved, but how about real data.
  • 27:44 - 27:48
    Can we look out there and actually measure
    galaxies, and actually measure how stuff
  • 27:48 - 27:53
    looks, and see the structure in the
    universe? Turns out, we can. And it looks
  • 27:53 - 27:59
    like this. And it just blows my mind.
    Because you see this whole bee hive
  • 27:59 - 28:03
    structure, you see the voids, you see the
    filaments of super galaxy cluster
  • 28:03 - 28:09
    structures sort of strung together. And
    that's just real data. That is the largest
  • 28:09 - 28:14
    scale structure of all the galaxies, of
    the observable universe, that have ever
  • 28:14 - 28:22
    been recorded. And this relies on the
    measurements of type 1a supernovae, and of
  • 28:22 - 28:27
    the galaxies which relies on measurements
    of, for example, the Cepheids stars, which
  • 28:27 - 28:30
    rely on measurements of the parallax, of
    the geometrical parallax, like we
  • 28:30 - 28:36
    discussed here in this room. So, the way
    of looking at the universe like this, of
  • 28:36 - 28:43
    all the super galaxy clusters, actually
    begins when we string together these to
  • 28:43 - 28:47
    form what's called the cosmological
    distance ladder of all these different
  • 28:47 - 28:52
    methods building upon each other. And it
    starts right here, when we look up at the
  • 28:52 - 28:56
    sky. So, I hope you enjoy that,
    thanks for your attention.
  • 28:56 - 29:06
    applause
  • 29:06 - 29:13
    Herald: Thank you very much, Michael. So,
    we still have time for questions. Line up
  • 29:13 - 29:19
    at the microphones if you want to ask any
    here and now. And we get a little
  • 29:19 - 29:27
    preference on the Internet, are there any
    questions, Signal Angel?
  • 29:27 - 29:32
    That doesn't seem to be the case,
    and we start with microphone 3, please.
  • 29:32 - 29:37
    Mic 3: Regarding the redshift of the
    further away galaxy, red light has less
  • 29:37 - 29:41
    energy than blue light, where
    does the energy go?
  • 29:41 - 29:46
    M: It's lost. In the process of the
    universe expanding, energy is not
  • 29:46 - 29:49
    conserved. And that's a big
    headache for physics.
  • 29:49 - 29:54
    laughter
    Herald: Microphone 4.
  • 29:54 - 29:59
    Mic 4: So, I was thinking that in the case
    that you try to measure the distance to a
  • 29:59 - 30:05
    far away galaxy, where we are talking in
    the scale that there is not sufficent
  • 30:05 - 30:12
    accuracy via parallax, so you rely on
    supernovas. So, you point the telescope in
  • 30:12 - 30:19
    a patch of the sky and you pick up a
    supernova. But you cannot really know, I
  • 30:19 - 30:26
    suppose, that the supernova belongs to the
    galaxy where all the other stars around
  • 30:26 - 30:30
    that are, or perhaps it's very far away on
    the z-axis in a different galaxy that's
  • 30:30 - 30:34
    just behind. Is that possible?
    How do you go around that?
  • 30:34 - 30:38
    M: Yes, you're right. You may find
    pictures, and I may find a picture of this
  • 30:38 - 30:44
    where galaxies are actually overlapping.
    So in this thing that I showed you from
  • 30:44 - 30:49
    the galaxy zoo, yeah, I think you see some
    galaxies overlapping now. This might mean
  • 30:49 - 30:51
    that they are close together and actually
    colliding, but it might also mean that
  • 30:51 - 30:58
    they just happen to be in the same
    direction. But then the type 1a supernova,
  • 30:58 - 31:02
    if you measure it, gives you an idea of
    how far away it is and then hopefully you
  • 31:02 - 31:07
    can estimate if it was the front galaxy or
    the back galaxy. But you can't be exactly
  • 31:07 - 31:10
    sure, you're right.
  • 31:10 - 31:12
    Herald: Okay, microphone 1, please.
  • 31:12 - 31:18
    Mic 1: Okay. Thanks, this is really
    fascinating. This might be a stupid
  • 31:18 - 31:27
    question. If the outer edges of our
    observable universe are expanding at
  • 31:27 - 31:34
    faster than the speed of light and we
    detect very far away galaxies with light,
  • 31:34 - 31:37
    how is the light ever reaching us?
  • 31:37 - 31:43
    M: We see only as far as the expansion of
    the universe will allow us. And, like we
  • 31:43 - 31:49
    heard in the talk before, stuff is falling
    behind the horizon. There are regions in
  • 31:49 - 31:54
    the universe now, where at a later point,
    because space is expanding, the light from
  • 31:54 - 31:59
    these regions will not be able to reach
    us. So if we look way out into the
  • 31:59 - 32:06
    universe to the very edge of what we can
    see, there is stuff disappearing there and
  • 32:06 - 32:10
    there is just no getting around there,
    if it's gone, it's gone.
  • 32:10 - 32:16
    Herald: Okay, this concludes the Q & A. A
    warm round of applause for Michael Büker.
  • 32:16 - 32:22
    applause
  • 32:22 - 32:29
    postroll music
  • 32:29 - 32:46
    subtitles created by c3subtitles.de
    in the year 2017. Join, and help us!
Title:
The Universe Is, Like, Seriously Huge (33c3)
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Duration:
32:46

English subtitles

Revisions