< Return to Video

Josiah McElheny in “Memory” - Season 3 | “Art in the Twenty-First Century"

  • 0:17 - 0:20
    McELHENY: A very important
    part of what has led me to being an artist
  • 0:20 - 0:22
    the way that I am...
  • 0:22 - 0:25
    was going to Europe and studying
  • 0:25 - 0:28
    these areas where they’ve always
    done glass manufacture.
  • 0:31 - 0:32
    I worked with glass
  • 0:32 - 0:35
    for a year and a half before I went there.
  • 0:36 - 0:40
    And the reason why I went there
    in the first place was because
  • 0:40 - 0:44
    I was interested in this story
    that I'd been told of it being this
  • 0:44 - 0:48
    secretive, romantic oral tradition
  • 0:48 - 0:51
    that was only passed on person to person.
  • 0:53 - 0:55
    I think also what I was interested in
  • 0:55 - 0:58
    is this idea of being an apprentice.
  • 0:59 - 1:01
    And in Europe,
    that's still a very normal idea.
  • 1:01 - 1:02
    And I didn't go there
  • 1:02 - 1:07
    with any kind of goal in mind,
    except to just experience that.
  • 1:09 - 1:12
    The people I stayed with were actually,
  • 1:12 - 1:15
    very much involved in the invention
    of mid-century modernism,
  • 1:15 - 1:21
    so in some sense, they were very,
    very far from the deep past.
  • 1:21 - 1:26
    In another sense, they were very,
    close to it because the way
  • 1:26 - 1:28
    they were working
  • 1:28 - 1:32
    essentially
    was unaltered for hundreds of years.
  • 1:32 - 1:37
    But...they were in connection with these,
  • 1:37 - 1:40
    famous architects
    and designers and artists.
  • 1:40 - 1:43
    They had figured out a way--
    and been very instrumental in
  • 1:43 - 1:47
    figuring out a way to adapt this tradition
  • 1:47 - 1:49
    to make modern objects.
  • 1:53 - 1:54
    I've made this works
  • 1:54 - 1:57
    that were about this connection
    between a glass factory
  • 1:57 - 2:00
    and the designs of Christian Dior.
  • 2:00 - 2:02
    And they were displayed in an
  • 2:02 - 2:06
    installation that was based on the 1952
    Venice Biennale.
  • 2:07 - 2:09
    Those objects
    that were parts of that piece,
  • 2:09 - 2:14
    they had to feel like a 1950s glass vase.
  • 2:14 - 2:17
    They had to look like a figurine,
  • 2:17 - 2:21
    and they had to look like the specific
    dress they were based on.
  • 2:28 - 2:30
    And then they had to look
  • 2:30 - 2:35
    balanced or not too ugly or not too...
  • 2:37 - 2:40
    Yeah, they had to
    have some kind of elegance.
  • 2:40 - 2:43
    So, a lot of times, it's also too, a kind of,
    you know,
  • 2:43 - 2:47
    a basic visual elegance or balance
    that I'm looking for.
  • 2:48 - 2:52
    A lot of my work
    comes from memory in the sense
  • 2:52 - 2:57
    that my work is a memory of objects.
  • 3:01 - 3:03
    All of my work is essentially derived
  • 3:03 - 3:06
    from some previous source at some level.
  • 3:07 - 3:10
    A lot of times
    what I'm doing is sort of reimagining
  • 3:10 - 3:14
    something or transforming it slightly,
    but it's always very much in connection
  • 3:14 - 3:16
    to its source.
  • 3:23 - 3:26
    I feel lucky that I have the opportunity
  • 3:26 - 3:29
    to know how to make some things myself.
  • 3:29 - 3:35
    I find it very pleasurable to really want
    to make a certain kind of thing,
  • 3:36 - 3:39
    and have an idea of how I want it to be,
  • 3:41 - 3:44
    and then to get fairly close
    to that.
  • 3:44 - 3:44
    —Stop.
  • 3:48 - 3:48
    It involves
  • 3:48 - 3:52
    working with other people,
    and I like that aspect of it.
  • 3:53 - 3:56
    You can't stop in the middle--
    it's like playing a piece of music--
  • 3:56 - 4:01
    so you know you have to be in its own time
    throughout the period of making it.
  • 4:01 - 4:04
    It can be very, very frustrating.
  • 4:04 - 4:06
    The problem is, is you can't touch it.
  • 4:06 - 4:10
    If you could touch it,
    it would be very relatively easy to do,
  • 4:10 - 4:13
    so you have to manipulate it
    in other ways.
  • 4:13 - 4:16
    There's this visceral thing
    that you actually haven't touched it,
  • 4:16 - 4:21
    so once it cools off,
    you know, overnight or something,
  • 4:21 - 4:23
    I often have the feeling of, like,
  • 4:23 - 4:27
    even though I recognize that I made it,
    I don't really believe it
  • 4:27 - 4:31
    until I, you know, take it out
    and handle it for a few days, maybe,
  • 4:31 - 4:34
    and then I start to, like,
    "Okay, yeah, maybe I made that."
  • 4:41 - 4:43
    For me, what being an artist
  • 4:43 - 4:47
    offered was being part of a community
    of people interested in ideas.
  • 4:47 - 4:51
    And that was really the reason
    from the beginning
  • 4:51 - 4:53
    why I want to be an artist.
  • 4:57 - 4:59
    I did this installation
  • 4:59 - 5:03
    based on this famous star
    that Adolf Loos designed,
  • 5:04 - 5:07
    the same year that he wrote this essay
    called "Ornament and Crime."
  • 5:08 - 5:11
    This famous essay describes
  • 5:11 - 5:15
    how removing ornament from the world
    is more morally pure.
  • 5:16 - 5:18
    Basically, it says primitive
  • 5:18 - 5:20
    people are the people who decorate;
  • 5:21 - 5:25
    that the natural course of progress in man
    is to remove this
  • 5:25 - 5:28
    decorative impulse from our psyche.
  • 5:31 - 5:35
    And it is about making
    the world white,
  • 5:35 - 5:39
    in the sense of a world
    without ornamentation, without
  • 5:40 - 5:42
    individuation, without grayness.
  • 5:43 - 5:46
    Almost immediately
    it falls apart
  • 5:46 - 5:48
    and becomes something
    really, really horrible,
  • 5:48 - 5:52
    and especially when it becomes
    imposed upon the world.
  • 5:54 - 5:56
    Buckminster Fuller, the
  • 5:56 - 5:59
    the inventor of the geodesic dome,
  • 5:59 - 6:03
    and Isamu Noguchi,
    the famous American sculptor,
  • 6:03 - 6:07
    met in a bar in 1929
    and had a conversation in which they
  • 6:07 - 6:10
    kind of invented a new
    kind of abstraction.
  • 6:10 - 6:13
    And it was an abstraction
    of total reflectivity.
  • 6:13 - 6:18
    And it was based on the notion
    that if you placed a reflective object
  • 6:18 - 6:22
    inside a totally reflective environment,
    that you would have
  • 6:22 - 6:26
    this completely new kind of seeing
    and this completely new experience
  • 6:26 - 6:27
    of form.
  • 6:32 - 6:36
    For this particular project,
    I wanted to use this--
  • 6:36 - 6:39
    this technique of
    silvering the inside of the glass
  • 6:39 - 6:43
    so that it's totally reflective
    to take advantage of this
  • 6:43 - 6:48
    natural property of the glass,
    creating this perfectly smooth surface.
  • 6:50 - 6:54
    All a mirror is this coating the backside
    of a piece of glass
  • 6:54 - 6:59
    with a coating of metal,
    so that the light reflects back at you.
  • 7:12 - 7:15
    You pour silver nitrate on a
    piece of glass and it turns into a mirror.
  • 7:15 - 7:17
    It's very simple, actually.
  • 7:26 - 7:27
    —Okay.
  • 7:36 - 7:38
    A recent show that I did was titled
  • 7:38 - 7:40
    "Total Reflective Abstraction."
  • 7:42 - 7:45
    There were three parts to it,
    three different rooms
  • 7:45 - 7:49
    that each contained a different kind of approach to this notion.
  • 7:52 - 7:55
    One was this project about
    Noguchi and Buckminster Fuller.
  • 7:56 - 7:58
    I took Noguchi's forms
  • 7:58 - 8:01
    and remade them as reflective objects.
  • 8:01 - 8:06
    And I created reflective environment,
    mostly based on his furniture designs
  • 8:07 - 8:10
    and proposals he did
    for abstract landscapes.
  • 8:13 - 8:15
    The forms are reflective
    in their environment,
  • 8:15 - 8:19
    the base on which they live, is reflective.
  • 8:25 - 8:27
    They're about a kind of utopia.
  • 8:28 - 8:32
    And they're the utopia of where
    everything is connected,
  • 8:32 - 8:36
    everything is perfect,
    seamless unity.
  • 8:39 - 8:42
    But it was important
    for me that these are models--
  • 8:45 - 8:46
    something that's never intended
  • 8:46 - 8:49
    to go beyond the model stage.
  • 9:00 - 9:04
    One set of works were what
    I called "Mirror Drawings,"
  • 9:04 - 9:07
    which were essentially
    just a sheet of glass mirror
  • 9:07 - 9:09
    put directly on the wall.
  • 9:10 - 9:12
    I made the glass itself,
  • 9:12 - 9:14
    the piece of glass that became a mirror.
  • 9:14 - 9:16
    And...
  • 9:16 - 9:21
    at one point in the process, I made this drawing
    with another kind of glass,
  • 9:21 - 9:25
    and then sandwiched it
    in with more glass on top.
  • 9:27 - 9:31
    Then when you stand in front of them,
    then suddenly you see yourself,
  • 9:31 - 9:35
    but you see yourself overlaid
    with this pattern.
  • 9:35 - 9:39
    It was sort of this idea of this metaphor
    of what art is.
  • 9:39 - 9:43
    The experience of art is a kind of fusion
    of your experience of yourself
  • 9:43 - 9:44
    and of the object.
  • 9:49 - 9:51
    In one of the other rooms
  • 9:51 - 9:56
    is two competing versions of the history
    of 20th-century design objects.
  • 9:57 - 9:59
    The displays
    themselves are completely reflective
  • 9:59 - 10:03
    on the outside
    and completely reflective on the inside.
  • 10:03 - 10:07
    And then across
    the front is a piece of two-way mirror.
  • 10:08 - 10:10
    And the effect of this
  • 10:10 - 10:13
    is that the objects on the inside of this
  • 10:13 - 10:17
    are reflected
    theoretically infinitely in the mirror.
  • 10:17 - 10:19
    In the back side of the case.
  • 10:21 - 10:24
    You yourself are not reflected
    because it's a two-way mirror.
  • 10:24 - 10:27
    The objects
    themselves are totally reflected.
  • 10:28 - 10:30
    So the reflections move a little bit,
    but basically
  • 10:30 - 10:34
    all these reflections in the objects
    stay totally still.
  • 10:34 - 10:36
    So I had this very airless quality.
  • 10:39 - 10:43
    The definition of being a modern
    person is to examine yourself,
  • 10:44 - 10:48
    to reflect on yourself,
    and to be a self-knowledgeable person.
  • 10:49 - 10:53
    So this is sort of a--a history
    of what it is to be 20th-century.
  • 10:55 - 10:57
    Here's these
  • 10:57 - 11:01
    objects that represent culture
    that you know, that is around us,
  • 11:01 - 11:05
    and then they're reflecting on themselves
    in an infinite
  • 11:05 - 11:08
    regression, in a kind of,
    you know, infinite narcissism.
  • 11:08 - 11:10
    So they're sort of, uh...
  • 11:10 - 11:13
    yes, this is sort of what
    the 20th century was.
  • 11:18 - 11:20
    I'm interested in
  • 11:21 - 11:23
    the question of seduction.
  • 11:23 - 11:29
    And I'm interested in the idea of how do you seduce people to be interested
  • 11:29 - 11:31
    in what you've done?
  • 11:35 - 11:38
    Seduction often involves
    presenting something
  • 11:38 - 11:41
    in a very kind of sumptuous way,
  • 11:41 - 11:43
    and that attracts people.
  • 11:47 - 11:50
    I hope that my work functions
  • 11:50 - 11:54
    to seduce you, so that
    you want to look at it.
  • 12:23 - 12:27
    To learn more about Art21: Art in the Twenty-First Century
  • 12:27 - 12:33
    and to download the Free Educators
    Guide, please visit PBS online at pbs.org.
  • 12:36 - 12:41
    Art21: Art in the Twenty-First Century is available on videocassette
  • 12:41 - 12:44
    or with additional features on DVD.
  • 12:45 - 12:48
    The companion
    book to the program is also available.
  • 12:48 - 12:53
    To order: Call PBS Home Video at one 800 play PBS.
Title:
Josiah McElheny in “Memory” - Season 3 | “Art in the Twenty-First Century"
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Team:
Art21
Project:
"Art in the Twenty-First Century" broadcast series

English (United States) subtitles

Revisions