-
Conventional wisdom about diets,
-
including government
health recommendations,
-
seems to change all the time.
-
And yet, ads routinely come about
-
claiming to have the answer
about what we should eat.
-
So how do we distinguish
what's actually healthy
-
from what advertisers just want us
to believe is good for us?
-
Marketing takes advantage of
the desire to drop weight fast,
-
and be stronger,
-
slimmer,
-
and brighter.
-
And in the big picture, diet plans
promising dramatic results,
-
known as fad diets,
-
are just what they seem:
too good to be true.
-
So where do diet fads even come from?
-
While the Ancient Greeks and Romans
-
rallied behind large-scale
health regimens centuries earlier,
-
this phenomenon began in earnest
in the Victorian Era
-
with crazes like the vinegar diet
-
and the banting diet.
-
Since then, diets have advised us
all sorts of things:
-
to excessively chew,
-
to not chew at all,
-
to swallow a grapefruit per meal,
-
non-stop cabbage soup,
-
even consumption of arsenic,
-
or tapeworms.
-
If the idea of diet crazes
has withstood history,
-
could this mean that they work?
-
In the short-term,
the answer is often yes.
-
Low-carbohydrate plans,
-
like the popular Atkin's
or South Beach diets,
-
have an initial diuretic effect.
-
Sodium is lost until the body
can balance itself out,
-
and temporary fluid weight loss may occur.
-
With other high-protein diets,
you might lose weight at first
-
since by restricting your food choices,
-
you are dropping
your overall calorie intake.
-
But your body then lowers
its metabolic rate to adjust to the shift,
-
lessening the diet's effect over time
-
and resulting in a quick reversal
if the diet is abandoned.
-
So while these diets
may be alluring early on,
-
they don't guarantee long-term benefits
for your health and weight.
-
A few simple guidelines, though,
can help differentiate between
-
a diet that is beneficial
in maintaining long-term health,
-
and one that only offers temporary
weight changes.
-
Here's the first tipoff;
-
If a diet focuses on intensely cutting
back calories,
-
or on cutting out entire food groups,
-
like fat, sugar, or carbohydrates,
-
chances are it's a fad diet.
-
And another red flag is ritual,
-
when the diet in question instructs you
to only eat specific foods,
-
prescribed combinations,
-
or to opt for particular food substitutes,
-
like drinks, bars, or powders.
-
The truth is shedding pounds
in the long-run
-
simply doesn't have a quick-fix solution.
-
Not all diet crazes tout weight loss.
-
What about claims of superfoods, cleanses,
and other body-boosting solutions?
-
Marketing emphasizes the allure
-
of products associated with ancient
and remote cultures
-
to create a sense of mysticism
for consumers.
-
While so-called superfoods,
like blueberries or acai,
-
do add a powerful punch of nutrients,
-
their super transformative qualities
are largely exaggeration.
-
They are healthy additions
to a balanced diet,
-
yet often, they're marketed
as part of sugary drinks or cereals,
-
in which case the negative properties
outweight the benefits.
-
Cleanses, too, may be great in moderation
-
since they can assist
with jumpstarting weightloss
-
and can increase the number of fresh
fruits and vegetables consumed daily.
-
Scientifically speaking, though,
-
they've not yet been shown to have
either a long-term benefit
-
or to detox the body any better than
the natural mechanisms already in place.
-
Everywhere we look,
-
we're offered solutions
to how we can look better,
-
feel fitter,
-
and generally get ahead.
-
Food is no exception,
-
but advice on what we should eat is best
left to the doctors and nutritionists
-
who are aware of our
individual circumstances.
-
Diets and food fads
aren't inherently wrong.
-
Circumstantially,
they might even be right,
-
just not for everyone all of the time.
Riaki Ponist
3:26 "in which case the negative properties
outweight the benefits."
should be:
"in which case the negative properties
outweigh the benefits."
Please could you correct the transcript?
Thanks,
Riaki