How many verb tenses are there in English? - Anna Ananichuk

Check out our Patreon page: https://www.patreon.com/teded

View full lesson: https://ed.ted.com/lessons/how-many-verb-tenses-are-there-in-english-anna-ananichuk

How many different verb tenses are there in a language like English? At first, the answer seems obvious — there’s past, present, and future. But it isn't quite that simple. Anna Ananichuk explains how thanks to something called grammatical aspect, each of those time periods actually divides further.

Lesson by Anna Ananichuk, directed by Luke Rotzler.

Thank you so much to our patrons for your support! Without you this video would not be possible.

Grammatical tense
is how languages talk about time

without explicitly naming time periods

by, instead, modifying verbs
to specify when action occurs.

So how many different tenses are there
in a language like English?

At first, the answer seems obvious:

there's past,

present,

and future.

But thanks to something called
grammatical aspect,

each of those time periods
actually divides further.

There are four kinds of aspect.

In the continuous or progressive aspect,

the actions are still happening
at the time of reference.

The perfect aspect describes actions
that are finished.

The perfect progressive aspect
is a combination,

describing a completed part
of a continuous action.

And finally, there's the simple aspect,

the basic form of the past,
present, and future tense,

where an action is not specified
as continuous or discrete.

That's all a little hard to follow,
so let's see how it works in action.

Let's say your friends tell you
they went on a secret naval mission

to collect evidence
of a mysterious sea creature.

The tense sets the overall frame
of reference in the past,

but within that, there are many options.

Your friends might say a creature
attacked their boat,

that's the past simple,
the most general aspect,

which gives no further clarification.

They were sleeping when it happened,

a continuous process
underway at that point.

They might also tell you they had departed
from Nantucket

to describe an action
completed even earlier.

That's an example of the past perfect.

Or that they had been sailing
for three weeks,

something that was ongoing
up until that point.

In the present, they tell you that
they still search for the creature today,

their present simple activity.

Perhaps they are preparing for their
next mission continuously as they speak.

And they have built a special
submarine for it, a completed achievement.

Plus, if they have been researching
possible sightings of the creature,

it's something they've been doing
for a while and are still doing now

making it present perfect progressive.

So what does this next mission hold?

You know it still hasn't happened
because they will depart next week,

the future simple.

Your friends will be searching
for the elusive creature,

an extended continuous undertaking.

They tell you the submarine will have
reached uncharted depths a month from now.

That's a confident prediction

about what will be achieved
by a specific point in the future,

a point at which they
will have been voyaging for three weeks

in the future perfect progressive.

The key insight to all these
different tenses

is that each sentence takes place
in a specific moment,

whether it's past, present, or future.

The point of aspects is that they tell you
as of that moment

the status of the action.

In total, they give us twelve
possibilities in English.

What about other languages?

Some, like French,

Swahili,

and Russian
take a similar approach to English.

Others describe
and divide time differently.

Some have fewer grammatical tenses,
like Japanese,

which only distinguishes past
from non-past,

Buli and Tukang Basi,

which only distinguish future
from non-future,

and Mandarin Chinese
with no verb tenses at all, only aspect.

On the other hand, languages like Yagwa
split past tense into multiple degrees,

like whether something happened hours,
weeks, or years ago.

In others, tenses are intertwined
with moods that can convey urgency,

necessity,

or probability of events.

This makes translation difficult
but not impossible.

Speakers of most languages without certain
tenses can express the same ideas

with auxiliary words,
like would or did,

or by specifying the time they mean.

Are the variations
from language to language

just differents ways of describing
the same fundamental reality?

Or do their diverse structures reflect
different ways of thinking about the world

and even time itself?

And if so, what other ways
of conceiving time may be out there?