-
Memory is such an everyday thing
that we almost take it for granted.
-
We all remember what we had
for breakfast this morning,
-
or what we did last weekend.
-
It's only when memory starts to fail
-
that we appreciate just how amazing it is,
-
and how much we allow
our past experiences to define us.
-
But memory is not always a good thing.
-
As the American poet and clergyman
John Lancaster Spalding once said,
-
"As memory may be a paradise
from which we cannot be driven,
-
it may also be a hell
from which we cannot escape."
-
Many of us experience
chapters of our lives
-
that we would prefer
to never have happened.
-
It is estimated that
nearly 90 percent of us
-
will experience some sort of
traumatic event during our lifetimes.
-
Many of us will suffer acutely
following these events, and then recover,
-
maybe even become better people
because of those experiences.
-
But some events are so extreme
-
that many, up to half of those
who survive sexual violence, for example,
-
will go on to develop
post-traumatic stress disorder,
-
or PTSD.
-
PTSD is a debilitating
mental health condition
-
characterized by symptoms
such as intense fear and anxiety
-
and flashbacks of the traumatic event.
-
These symptoms have a huge impact
on a person's quality of life
-
and are often triggered
by particular situations
-
or cues in that person's environment.
-
The responses to those cues may have been
adaptive when they were first learned --
-
fear and diving for cover
in a war zone, for example --
-
but in PTSD,
-
they continue to control behavior
when it's no longer appropriate.
-
If a combat veteran returns home
and is diving for cover
-
when he or she hears a car backfiring,
-
or can't leave their own home
because of intense anxiety,
-
then the response
to those cues, those memories,
-
have become what we
would refer to as maladaptive.
-
In this way, we can think of PTSD
as being a disorder of maladaptive memory.
-
Now I should stop myself here,
-
because I'm talking about memory
as if it's a single thing.
-
It isn't.
-
There are many different types of memory,
-
and these depend upon different circuits
and regions within the brain.
-
As you can see, there are two
major distinctions in our types of memory.
-
There are those memories
that we're consciously aware of,
-
where we know we know
-
and that we can pass on in words.
-
This would include memories
for facts and events.
-
Because we can declare these memories,
-
we refer to these as declarative memories.
-
The other type of memory
is non-declarative.
-
These are memories where we often
don't have conscious access
-
to the content of those memories
-
and that we can't pass on in words.
-
The classic example
of a non-declarative memory
-
is the motor skill for riding a bike.
-
Now, this being Cambridge,
the odds are that you can ride a bike.
-
You know what you're doing on two wheels.
-
But if I asked you to write me
a list of instructions
-
that would teach me how to ride a bike,
-
as my four-year old son did
when we bought him a bike
-
for his last birthday,
-
you would really struggle to do that.
-
How should you sit on the bike
so you're balanced?
-
How fast do you need to pedal
so you're stable?
-
If a gust of wind comes at you,
-
which muscles should you tense
and by how much
-
so that you don't get blown off?
-
I'll be staggered if you can give
the answers to those questions.
-
But if you can ride a bike,
you do have the answers,
-
you're just not consciously aware of them.
-
Getting back to PTSD,
-
another type of non-declarative memory
-
is emotional memory.
-
Now this has a specific
meaning in psychology
-
and refers to our ability
to learn about cues in our environment
-
and their emotional
and motivational significance.
-
What do I mean by that?
-
Well, think of a cue
like a smell of baking bread,
-
or a more abstract cue
like a 20-pound note.
-
Because these cues have been pegged
with good things in the past,
-
we like them and we approach them.
-
Other cues, like the buzzing of a wasp,
elicit very negative emotions
-
and quite dramatic
avoidance behavior in some people.
-
Now, I hate wasps.
-
I can tell you that fact.
-
But what I can't give you
are the non-declarative emotional memories
-
for how I react
when there's a wasp nearby.
-
I can't give you the racing heart,
-
the sweaty palms,
that sense of rising panic.
-
I can describe them to you,
but I can't give them to you.
-
Now importantly,
from the perspective of PTSD,
-
stress has very different effects on
declarative and non-declarative memories
-
and the brain circuits
and regions supporting them.
-
Emotional memory is supported
by a small almond-shaped structure
-
called the amygdala and its connections.
-
Declarative memory, especially the what,
where and when of ?? memory,
-
is supported by a seahorse-shaped
region of the brain
-
called the hippocampus.
-
The extreme levels of stress
experienced during trauma
-
have very different effects
on these two structures.
-
As you can see, as you increase
a person's level of stress
-
from not stressful to slightly stressful,
-
the hippocampus,
-
acting to support the event memory,
-
increases in its activity
and works better to support
-
the storage of that declarative memory.
-
But as you increase
to moderately stressful,
-
intensely stressful,
and then extremely stressful,
-
as would be found in trauma,
the hippocampus effectively shuts down.
-
This means that under
the high levels of stress hormones
-
that are experienced during trauma,
we are not storing the details,
-
the specific details,
of what, where and when.
-
Now, while stress is doing that
to the hippocampus,
-
look at what it does to the amygdala,
-
that structure important
for the emotional, non-declarative memory.
-
Its activity gets stronger and stronger.
-
So what this leaves us with in PTSD
is an overly strong emotional,
-
in this case fear, memory
-
that is not tied
to a specific time or place
-
because the hippocampus
is not storing what, where and when.
-
In this way, these cues
can control behavior
-
when it's no longer appropriate,
and that's how they become maladaptive.
-
So if we know that PTSD
is due to maladaptive memories,
-
can we use that knowledge
to improve treatment outcomes
-
for patients with PTSD?
-
A radical new approach being developed
to treat post-traumatic stress disorder
-
aims to destroy those maladaptive
emotional memories
-
that underly the disorder.
-
This approach has only
been considered a possibility
-
because of the profound changes
-
in our understanding
of memory in recent years.
-
Traditionally, it was thought
that making a memory
-
was like writing in a notebook in pen.
-
Once the ink had dried,
you couldn't change the information.
-
It was thought that all
those structural changes
-
that happen in the brain
to support the storage of memory
-
were finished with in about six hours,
-
and after that they were permanent.
-
This is known as the consolidation view.
-
However, more recent research suggests
that making a memory
-
is actually more like writing
in a word processor.
-
We initially make the memory
and then we save it or store it,
-
but under the right conditions
we can edit that memory.
-
This re-consolidation view suggests
that those structural changes
-
that happen in the brain to support memory
-
can be undone,
-
even for old memories.
-
Now, this editing process
isn't happening all the time.
-
It only happens under
very specific conditions
-
of memory retrieval.
-
So let's consider memory retrieval
as being recalling the memory
-
or, like, opening the file.
-
Quite often, we are simply
retrieving the memory.
-
We are opening the file as read-only.
-
But under the right conditions,
-
we can open that file in edit mode,
-
and then we can change the information.
-
In theory, we could delete
the content of that file,
-
and when we press save,
-
that is how the file,
-
the memory,
-
persists.
-
Not only does this re-consolidation view
-
allow us to account for some
of the quirks of memory,
-
like how we all sometimes
mis-remember the past,
-
it also gives us a way to destroy
those maladaptive fear memories
-
that underly PTSD.
-
All we would need would be two things:
-
a way of making the memory unstable,
-
opening that file in edit mode;
-
and a way to delete the information.
-
We've made the most progress
-
with working out
how to delete the information.
-
It was found fairly early on
that a drug widely prescribed
-
to control blood pressure in humans,
a beta blocker called Propranolol,
-
could be used to prevent
the re-consolidation
-
of fear memories in rats.
-
If Propranolol was given
while the memory was in edit mode,
-
rats behaved as if they were no longer
afraid of a frightening trigger cue.
-
It was as if they had never learned
to be afraid of that cue.
-
And this was with a drug
that was safe for use in humans.
-
Now, not longer after that,
it was shown that Propranolol
-
could destroy fear memories
in humans as well,
-
but critically it only works
if the memory is in edit mode.
-
Now, that study was with
healthy human volunteers,
-
but it's important because it shows
that the rat findings
-
can be extended to humans,
and ultimately to human patients.
-
And with humans,
-
you can test whether destroying
the non-declarative emotional memory
-
does anything to
the declarative event memory.
-
And this is really interesting.
-
Even though people
who were given Propranolol
-
while the memory was in edit mode
-
were no longer afraid
of that frightening trigger cue,
-
they could still describe the relationship
-
between the cue
and the frightening outcome.
-
It was as if they knew
they should be afraid,
-
and yet they weren't.
-
This suggests that Propranolol
can selectively target
-
the non-declarative emotional memory
-
but leave the declarative
event memory intact.
-
But critically, Propranolol can only have
any effect on the memory
-
if it's in edit mode.
-
So how do we make a memory unstable?
-
How do we get it into edit mode?
-
Well, my own lab has done
quite a lot of work on this.
-
We know that it depends on introducing
some but not too much new information
-
to be incorporated into the memory.
-
We know about the different chemicals
the brain uses to signal
-
that a memory should be updated
-
and the file edited.
-
Now our work is mostly in rats,
-
but other labs have found the same factors
allow memories to be edited in humans,
-
even maladaptive memories
like those underlying PTSD.
-
In fact, a number of labs
in several different countries
-
have begun small-scale clinical trials
of these memory-destroying treatments
-
for PTSD
-
and have found really promising results.
-
Now, these studies need replication
on a larger scale,
-
but they show the promise
of these memory-destroying treatments
-
for PTSD.
-
Maybe trauma memories do not need to be
the hell from which we cannot escape.
-
Now, although this memory-destroying
approach holds great promise,
-
that's not to say
that it's straightforward
-
or without controversy.
-
Is it ethical to destroy memories?
-
What about things
like eyewitness testimony?
-
What if you can't give someone Propranolol
-
because it would interfere
with other medicines that they're taking?
-
Well, with respect to ethics
and eyewitness testimony,
-
I would say the important
point to remember
-
is the finding from that human study.
-
Because Propranolol is only acting
on the non-declarative emotional memory,
-
it seems unlikely that it would affect
eyewitness testimony,
-
which is based on declarative memory.
-
Essentially, what these
memory-destroying treatments
-
are aiming to do
-
is to reduce the emotional memory,
-
not get rid of the trauma
memory altogether.
-
This should make the responses
of those with PTSD
-
more like those who have
been through trauma
-
and not developed PTSD
-
than people who have never
experienced trauma in the first place.
-
I think that most people would find that
more ethically acceptable
-
than a treatment that aimed
to create some sort of spotless mind.
-
What about Propranolol?
-
You can't give Propranolol to everyone,
-
and not everyone wants to take drugs
to treat mental health conditions.
-
Well here Tetris could be useful.
-
Yes, Tetris.
-
Working with clinical collaborators,
-
we've been looking at whether
behavior interventions
-
can also interfere with
the re-consolidation of memories.
-
Now, how would that work?
-
Well, we know that
it's basically impossible
-
to do two tasks at the same time
-
if they both depend on
the same brain region for processing.
-
Think trying to sing along to the radio
-
while you're trying to compose an email.
-
The processing for one
interferes with the other.
-
Well, it's the same when
you retrieve the memory,
-
especially in edit mode.
-
If we take a highly visual symptom
like flashbacks and PTSD
-
and get people to recall
the memory in edit mode,
-
and then get them to do
a highly engaging visual task
-
like playing Tetris,
-
it should be possible to introduce
so much interfering information
-
into that memory
-
that it essentially becomes meaningless.
-
That's the theory,
-
and it's supported by data
from healthy human volunteers.
-
Now, our volunteers watched
highly unpleasant films --
-
so think eye surgery,
road traffic safety adverts,
-
Scorsese's "The Big Shave."
-
These trauma films produce
something like flashbacks
-
in healthy volunteers
for about a week after viewing them.
-
We found that getting people
to recall those memories,
-
the worst moments
of those unpleasant films,
-
and playing Tetris at the same time,
-
massively reduced the frequency
of the flashbacks,
-
and again the memory had to be
in edit mode for that to work.
-
Now, my collaborators have since
taken this to clinical populations.
-
They've tested this in survivors
of road traffic accidents
-
and mothers who have had
emergency Caesarean sections,
-
both types of trauma
that frequently lead to PTSD,
-
and they found really promising
reductions in symptoms
-
in both of those clinical cases.
-
So although there is still much to learn
and procedures to optimize,
-
these memory-destroying treatments
hold great promise
-
for the treatment
of mental health disorders
-
like PTSD.
-
Maybe trauma memories do not need
to be a hell from which we cannot escape.
-
I believe that this approach
-
should allow those who want to
-
to turn the page
on chapters of their lives
-
that they would prefer
to never have experienced,
-
and so improve our mental health.
-
Thank you.
-
(Applause)