-
>> Similar to the concept that
current division applies in
-
exactly the same way or in an analogous
way as we've ever to put it in
-
an analogous way to what we saw when
we had two resistances in parallel.
-
So we have this current
I sub S flowing into a node.
-
Part of that current is going to
come down here in flow through Z_1,
-
and the other part of the current will
flow down into Z_2 and of course,
-
I_1 plus I_2 must equal I sub S. So we
-
have I_1 is equal to I sub S times.
-
So we're talking about the current
coming down here and just as it
-
was when we had resistances in series,
-
this current here was proportional
to this impedance now.
-
So the larger this impedance,
-
the greater the current flowing down here.
-
You can think of it as the more restricted
this path is for a current to flow,
-
the more current you'll have over here.
-
So I_1 is proportional to Z_2,
-
and it is then I_1 equals I sub S
times Z_2 over Z_1 plus Z_2.
-
Similarly, I_2, the current flowing
through here is going to be proportional
-
to Z_1 or times I sub S
times Z_1 over Z_1 plus Z_2,
-
and again, it's a pretty simple
exercise to show that I_1
-
plus I_2 must equal I sub S. That comes
just from Kirchhoff's Current Law.
-
Again let's just do an example
using I sub S equals that Z_1,
-
Z_2, the same Z_1 and Z_2
we were using before.
-
So in this case I_1 is going to
equal I sub S which is 2e to
-
the j25 times Z_2 which is
-
5 minus j divided by the sum
-
Z_1 plus Z_2 which is
three plus j2 plus 5 minus j.
-
When you do the calculations on that,
-
you get then that I_1 is equal to
-
1.26e to the j6.57 degrees.
-
That's I_1 and we can do I_2 right here,
-
I_2 then is equal to I sub S
to e to the j25 times Z_1,
-
which is 3 plus j2 over Z_1 plus Z_2,
-
or 3 plus j2 plus 5 minus j.
-
You did the calculations on that,
-
and you get that I_2 is equal to
-
0.894e to
-
the j51.57.
-
Again, I'll leave it to you to show
that I_1 plus I_2 is equal to I sub S,
-
which was 2e to the j25.