< Return to Video

2017 LVGEA Las Vegas Perspective Event

  • 0:00 - 0:07
    Welcome to the 37th annual Las Vegas
  • 0:07 - 0:08
    Perspective.
  • 0:08 - 0:11
    My name is Jonas Peterson. I'm the CEO of
  • 0:11 - 0:13
    the Las Vegas Global Economic Alliance,
  • 0:13 - 0:16
    and I am so excited. I am honored to be
  • 0:16 - 0:19
    your host this morning. Truth is, this is
  • 0:19 - 0:23
    my favorite event of the entire year
  • 0:23 - 0:26
    And thanks to your support, thanks to
  • 0:26 - 0:29
    your overwhelming support this turned
  • 0:29 - 0:31
    out to be a really hot ticket this year
  • 0:31 - 0:33
    I don't know if you guys saw this but we
  • 0:33 - 0:37
    sold out not a week ahead of time, not
  • 0:37 - 0:41
    two weeks, but over a month in advance,
  • 0:41 - 0:46
    right? is that worth thank you thank you
  • 0:46 - 0:48
    not only that but I'm glad you guys are
  • 0:48 - 0:50
    here we had to turn away around a
  • 0:50 - 0:52
    hundred that wanted to be with us this
  • 0:52 - 0:54
    morning so congratulations to you for
  • 0:54 - 0:56
    making the cut early thank you for
  • 0:56 - 0:59
    coming out but seriously this tells us
  • 0:59 - 1:02
    two things one we're probably going to
  • 1:02 - 1:04
    need to look at a bigger room next year
  • 1:04 - 1:07
    and two more importantly that we're on
  • 1:07 - 1:10
    the right track to deliver on the brand
  • 1:10 - 1:12
    promise for perspective that brand
  • 1:12 - 1:14
    promise is to be Southern Nevada's
  • 1:14 - 1:17
    premier source for community and
  • 1:17 - 1:19
    economic information analysis and
  • 1:19 - 1:23
    forecasting now for this morning we've
  • 1:23 - 1:25
    been working with our perspective
  • 1:25 - 1:28
    Council to raise the bar once again and
  • 1:28 - 1:30
    I am excited for what we have in store
  • 1:30 - 1:32
    for you. Let me tell you a little bit
  • 1:32 - 1:35
    about what we have planned. It starts
  • 1:35 - 1:38
    with the prospective data book that you
  • 1:38 - 1:39
    received when you came in this morning.
  • 1:39 - 1:42
    In that book, you will find a
  • 1:42 - 1:44
    comprehensive overview of the market as
  • 1:44 - 1:47
    it exists today. It's jam-packed with
  • 1:47 - 1:50
    information and statistics that you need
  • 1:50 - 1:53
    to know to understand our community, our
  • 1:53 - 1:56
    economy and where it's going. That's just
  • 1:56 - 2:00
    the beginning. This year, we put in new
  • 2:00 - 2:02
    content from dozens of community and
  • 2:02 - 2:04
    business leaders so that you can hear in
  • 2:04 - 2:07
    their own words about major projects and
  • 2:07 - 2:09
    priorities that they expect for the next
  • 2:09 - 2:11
    12 months. These are the big
  • 2:11 - 2:13
    organizations in our reach.
  • 2:13 - 2:15
    fFom higher education to our cities to
  • 2:15 - 2:18
    our TC to the Water Authority, and much
  • 2:18 - 2:22
    more. In addition, in the book, we've
  • 2:22 - 2:25
    retooled our polling to do a deeper dive
  • 2:25 - 2:27
    into the attitudes and opinions of the
  • 2:27 - 2:29
    Southern Nevada workforce. We want you to
  • 2:29 - 2:30
    be able to understand what the business
  • 2:30 - 2:33
    community is thinking on key topics,
  • 2:33 - 2:36
    sometimes controversial topics like
  • 2:36 - 2:38
    marijuana, stadium development, minimum
  • 2:38 - 2:43
    wage and much more. Also in the book,
  • 2:43 - 2:46
    you got forecast content where we pull
  • 2:46 - 2:47
    in subject matter. Experts,
  • 2:47 - 2:50
    dozens of subject matter experts, and ask
  • 2:50 - 2:52
    them to give their prediction on what's
  • 2:52 - 2:54
    going to happen in the economy over the
  • 2:54 - 2:56
    next 12 months. All that packed into the
  • 2:56 - 2:59
    book. And if we can advance, all right? So
  • 2:59 - 3:01
    you starts with the book during the
  • 3:01 - 3:03
    event today. We've got a powerhouse
  • 3:03 - 3:05
    lineup for you of speakers that are
  • 3:05 - 3:07
    going to do a deep dive into our economy
  • 3:07 - 3:10
    into advancing the business of health
  • 3:10 - 3:13
    care and a look at the future of gaming.
  • 3:13 - 3:16
    This is a powerhouse group of
  • 3:16 - 3:19
    speakers, and it doesn't stop there.
  • 3:19 - 3:21
    As you know with perspective, we want you
  • 3:21 - 3:23
    to be equipped with the latest
  • 3:23 - 3:25
    information and analysis throughout the
  • 3:25 - 3:28
    year. So is our gift to you, we're going
  • 3:28 - 3:30
    to be sending each of you that are here
  • 3:30 - 3:32
    this morning, quarterly newsletters with
  • 3:32 - 3:35
    more data analysis on topics like
  • 3:35 - 3:37
    education, infrastructure and
  • 3:37 - 3:41
    competitiveness throughout the year. And
  • 3:41 - 3:45
    we're also extending your access to the
  • 3:45 - 3:46
    LVG, a data portal.
  • 3:46 - 3:48
    You probably remember last year, we
  • 3:48 - 3:50
    showcased this new product. This is an
  • 3:50 - 3:54
    online tool that has real-time data
  • 3:54 - 3:56
    thousands of indicators and data points
  • 3:56 - 3:58
    all updated in real time along with
  • 3:58 - 4:00
    community mapping and much more. This is
  • 4:00 - 4:02
    our gift to you as well. Where if you're
  • 4:02 - 4:03
    here this morning, we want you to be able
  • 4:03 - 4:05
    to have this. So you will receive an
  • 4:05 - 4:07
    email with a one-year subscription to
  • 4:07 - 4:12
    the data portal and one last thing as
  • 4:12 - 4:14
    you leave this morning, we have the
  • 4:14 - 4:16
    latest project from our research center.
  • 4:16 - 4:18
    We're calling it the Southern Nevada
  • 4:18 - 4:21
    community map. This is not an ordinary
  • 4:21 - 4:23
    map, you'll grab it on your way out.
  • 4:23 - 4:26
    I want to tell you how it was created
  • 4:26 - 4:29
    We approached our friends that applied
  • 4:29 - 4:32
    analysis, and we asked them, "Can you help
  • 4:32 - 4:36
    us make a map that tells the future?" We
  • 4:36 - 4:39
    expected them to say no because that's
  • 4:39 - 4:42
    that's a ridiculous request. They said,
  • 4:42 - 4:44
    "Yes." They always do and the result is a
  • 4:44 - 4:47
    map that showcases the billions of
  • 4:47 - 4:49
    dollars of capital investment that we
  • 4:49 - 4:52
    expect to move forward along the Strip.
  • 4:52 - 4:54
    The billions more that's moving in our
  • 4:54 - 4:56
    economy through private businesses
  • 4:56 - 4:58
    around the region, new school
  • 4:58 - 5:01
    construction key assets, and so much more.
  • 5:01 - 5:03
    Take a close look at that map
  • 5:03 - 5:04
    when you receive it on the way out. I
  • 5:04 - 5:08
    think you will agree that it is awesome.
  • 5:08 - 5:11
    Now, we hope all this content it's
  • 5:11 - 5:13
    designed to add value to you so that
  • 5:13 - 5:15
    through the upcoming year you can make
  • 5:15 - 5:18
    better decisions at LVG, we believe that
  • 5:18 - 5:20
    information is the currency of economic
  • 5:20 - 5:22
    development and when we can equip
  • 5:22 - 5:25
    leaders like you with better information,
  • 5:25 - 5:28
    we as a team will make better decisions,
  • 5:28 - 5:30
    have a stronger community and have a
  • 5:30 - 5:34
    stronger economy. That's what perspective
  • 5:34 - 5:38
    is all about. All right. So again, thank
  • 5:38 - 5:40
    you for coming this morning. I want to
  • 5:40 - 5:44
    recognize a very special group. Make sure
  • 5:44 - 5:46
    I get this right so pull out the cards
  • 5:46 - 5:49
    for this. This is our Perspective Council.
  • 5:49 - 5:51
    The Perspective Council is responsible
  • 5:51 - 5:54
    for leading everything you see here, the
  • 5:54 - 5:58
    event, the speakers, the content. They're
  • 5:58 - 6:00
    not only sponsors but they're involved
  • 6:00 - 6:02
    in the process. There's an exceptional
  • 6:02 - 6:04
    group and I want to recognize them and
  • 6:04 - 6:06
    then give them each a big round of
  • 6:06 - 6:08
    applause. It starts with Cox
  • 6:08 - 6:11
    Communications, Derek Hill and your team.
  • 6:11 - 6:13
    could you guys stand up? Where you guys
  • 6:13 - 6:15
    at? I just...
  • 6:18 - 6:21
    So let me tell you just a little bit.
  • 6:21 - 6:26
    Derek is our vice chairman at LVGEA. Cox
  • 6:26 - 6:29
    is our pinnacle level investor and
  • 6:29 - 6:32
    they're all two on the prospective
  • 6:32 - 6:35
    Council. An amazing group. Thank you so
  • 6:35 - 6:37
    much. We appreciate you guys. Derek, you
  • 6:37 - 6:40
    are amazing. Thank you. 8 News Now
  • 6:40 - 6:42
    Lisa Howfield and the team does, stand
  • 6:42 - 6:44
    up for you. There you are
  • 6:44 - 6:49
    stand up and take a look at the crowd
  • 6:49 - 6:52
    that Lisa brings with. I believe this is
  • 6:52 - 6:55
    the largest group, you know, from 8 News
  • 6:55 - 6:56
    now that we have a perspective this
  • 6:56 - 6:58
    morning. So thank you so much. We
  • 6:58 - 6:59
    appreciate it.
  • 6:59 - 7:02
    Awesome at Nevada State Bank, Shannon
  • 7:02 - 7:06
    Petersen and the team, many times they're
  • 7:06 - 7:11
    there. Shannon's one of our new board
  • 7:11 - 7:13
    members at LVGA.
  • 7:13 - 7:15
    Thank you so much for this court. A
  • 7:15 - 7:17
    champion for our community at Wells
  • 7:17 - 7:20
    Fargo, Curt Clawson and the team. Stand on
  • 7:20 - 7:22
    up, guys.
  • 7:26 - 7:29
    Curt is on our executive committee at LVGA.
  • 7:29 - 7:32
    A rock star for this community always
  • 7:32 - 7:35
    saying as. Curt, you are amazing. Thank you,
  • 7:35 - 7:38
    and last but not least. The team at
  • 7:38 - 7:41
    Applied Analysis guys sent up Jeremy,
  • 7:41 - 7:43
    Brian,
  • 7:43 - 7:50
    Rachel, Melanie. The team, this is our
  • 7:50 - 7:53
    go-to group this is the brains behind
  • 7:53 - 7:55
    perspective. Perspective, I want you know,
  • 7:55 - 7:57
    they always say yes. They're always
  • 7:57 - 7:59
    striving to make this better, and they
  • 7:59 - 8:01
    blow us away when we ask for crazy
  • 8:01 - 8:03
    research requests. They find a way to
  • 8:03 - 8:06
    make it happen. We love you guys. Thank
  • 8:06 - 8:09
    you so much, all right? So that is our
  • 8:09 - 8:11
    perspective council. We also got a group
  • 8:11 - 8:13
    of in-kind investors that stepped up
  • 8:13 - 8:14
    this year. Let me read them off. We'll
  • 8:14 - 8:16
    give them a round of applause at the end
  • 8:16 - 8:17
    for helping us get the word out about
  • 8:17 - 8:20
    this event. We got KNPR, Lotus
  • 8:20 - 8:23
    Broadcasting, Elite Media and Vegas PBS.
  • 8:23 - 8:25
    Let's give a round of applause for this
  • 8:25 - 8:27
    group.
  • 8:29 - 8:32
    Thank you. There's a lot of elected
  • 8:32 - 8:34
    officials in the room. I caught a few of
  • 8:34 - 8:36
    you as you're coming in. So this
  • 8:36 - 8:37
    is probably an incomplete list, but I'm
  • 8:37 - 8:38
    going to give it a shot.
  • 8:38 - 8:40
    We've got mayor elect Deborah March from
  • 8:40 - 8:44
    Henderson here. Stand on up. Councilman
  • 8:44 - 8:46
    John Mars I believe is with us. This
  • 8:46 - 8:48
    morning councilman Dan Stewart,
  • 8:48 - 8:51
    councilman Stavros Anthony and
  • 8:51 - 8:53
    Commissioner Susan Prager.
  • 8:53 - 8:56
    Welcome elected officials. Stand on up if
  • 8:56 - 9:03
    I missed anybody all right now. It's the
  • 9:03 - 9:04
    fun part. We get to kick off the party.
  • 9:04 - 9:06
    We're going to invite up our first panel
  • 9:06 - 9:09
    before I do that, though, I want to remind
  • 9:09 - 9:11
    you to join the conversation on Twitter
  • 9:11 - 9:15
    #LVperspective. If you do that, I
  • 9:15 - 9:17
    think there's even on the the tent on
  • 9:17 - 9:18
    your table. You can ask questions
  • 9:18 - 9:20
    following our panel. You can be a part of
  • 9:20 - 9:22
    the discussion. In fact. I think we're
  • 9:22 - 9:24
    going to throw up a live Twitter wall in
  • 9:24 - 9:25
    just a little bit, so you will see that
  • 9:25 - 9:28
    firsthand. Here's our first panel. It's on
  • 9:28 - 9:31
    advancing the business of healthcare. Why?
  • 9:31 - 9:33
    Because there are amazing things
  • 9:33 - 9:35
    happening in this, in this industry, right?
  • 9:35 - 9:37
    Now, in fact, if you look at our economy,
  • 9:37 - 9:39
    it's the fastest jobs reducing segment.
  • 9:39 - 9:42
    There's major projects plan that you're
  • 9:42 - 9:44
    going to hear about and to tell you
  • 9:44 - 9:46
    about that. We've got a rock star group
  • 9:46 - 9:48
    of panelists. Let's start it off.
  • 9:48 - 9:50
    Betsy Fretwell from the city of Las
  • 9:50 - 9:53
    Vegas city manager, Betsy, could you come
  • 9:53 - 9:55
    join us?
  • 9:57 - 10:01
    From UNLV, we got the founding dean of
  • 10:01 - 10:03
    the medical school, Dr. Barbara Atkinson.
  • 10:03 - 10:04
    Welcome. Come join us.
  • 10:04 - 10:10
    [Applause]
  • 10:10 - 10:13
    From Toro University, the one and only,
  • 10:13 - 10:27
    Shelley Berkley, yeah.
  • 10:27 - 10:29
    And Doug Geinzer from Las Vegas HEALS. A man
  • 10:29 - 10:31
    who knows a lot about healthcare. Welcome.
  • 10:31 - 10:42
    Welcome. All right, all right. Good morning.
  • 10:42 - 10:47
    How are we doing? Excellent. So that's big.
  • 10:47 - 10:49
    If we could, I would like to kick it off
  • 10:49 - 10:52
    with you. Have them start us off, and
  • 10:52 - 10:54
    here's the question? Could you give us
  • 10:54 - 10:55
    the big picture? Why is
  • 10:55 - 10:57
    healthcare important to growing our
  • 10:57 - 11:00
    economy and also what is the city of Las
  • 11:00 - 11:03
    Vegas doing in particular to grow this
  • 11:03 - 11:06
    industry? Thank you, good morning, everyone.
  • 11:06 - 11:09
    It's a real pleasure to be here.
  • 11:09 - 11:11
    Healthcare is a critical industry for us.
  • 11:11 - 11:13
    One: we're underweighted in it and
  • 11:13 - 11:15
    everyone knows that when we do our
  • 11:15 - 11:18
    surveys at the city of Las Vegas that
  • 11:18 - 11:20
    there is always a concern about access
  • 11:20 - 11:24
    and quality. And so we know that we have
  • 11:24 - 11:26
    incredible quality, here in town, but we
  • 11:26 - 11:29
    do have an access issue, and many of the
  • 11:29 - 11:31
    panelists who are here with me today, are
  • 11:31 - 11:33
    working to improve that access by
  • 11:33 - 11:35
    creating new doctors and new medical
  • 11:35 - 11:37
    professionals that will help us.
  • 11:37 - 11:40
    It also helps bolster our economy. These
  • 11:40 - 11:42
    are good-paying jobs people, who are well
  • 11:42 - 11:45
    educated and they help us grow and
  • 11:45 - 11:48
    diversify. And that's been a critical
  • 11:48 - 11:51
    component for the city of Las Vegas. Most
  • 11:51 - 11:53
    recently, we put together a medical
  • 11:53 - 11:56
    district advisory board, about three or
  • 11:56 - 11:58
    four years ago, at the request of
  • 11:58 - 12:00
    Councilman Tarkanian and Mayor Carolyn
  • 12:00 - 12:03
    Goodman. We did that because we have one
  • 12:03 - 12:05
    of the single largest footprints of
  • 12:05 - 12:07
    medical care, and service delivery in the
  • 12:07 - 12:10
    middle of the city of Las Vegas. So, of
  • 12:10 - 12:13
    the distribution of healthcare
  • 12:13 - 12:17
    providers. In this community, we represent
  • 12:17 - 12:20
    64% of them right? In the medical
  • 12:20 - 12:22
    district in the heart of the city of Las
  • 12:22 - 12:24
    Vegas. And if you're trying to figure out
  • 12:24 - 12:25
    where that medical district is, it's
  • 12:25 - 12:28
    right by UMC. So, if you can picture that
  • 12:28 - 12:32
    right along Charleston, near Rancho, near
  • 12:32 - 12:35
    I-15. And also the council embarked upon
  • 12:35 - 12:38
    a plan to expand that district. And we've
  • 12:38 - 12:41
    added over 400 acres to that 200 acres,
  • 12:41 - 12:43
    so that we have plenty of room for
  • 12:43 - 12:47
    expansion. The council also adopted an
  • 12:47 - 12:50
    incredible master plan for that area in
  • 12:50 - 12:52
    partnership with all the institutional
  • 12:52 - 12:55
    providers in that 200 original acres, and
  • 12:55 - 12:58
    the expanded area that will bring us
  • 12:58 - 13:01
    over 600 acres of medical district
  • 13:01 - 13:03
    development. This is critically important
  • 13:03 - 13:05
    because if the city is investing wisely
  • 13:05 - 13:09
    in infrastructure, and all of the
  • 13:09 - 13:11
    providers in the area are partnering on
  • 13:11 - 13:13
    things that have a common good to them.
  • 13:13 - 13:16
    So not programmatic decisions not
  • 13:16 - 13:19
    whether or not Dr. Atkinson has 60 or 80
  • 13:19 - 13:22
    students per class, but really how are we
  • 13:22 - 13:25
    providing Street networks and a variety
  • 13:25 - 13:27
    of other infrastructure that helps drive
  • 13:27 - 13:28
    the cost down
  • 13:28 - 13:29
    to providing quality and affordable
  • 13:29 - 13:32
    healthcare to our community. It can
  • 13:32 - 13:34
    happen in the health district in the
  • 13:34 - 13:36
    medical district through our healthcare
  • 13:36 - 13:39
    providers. We really feel like this is an
  • 13:39 - 13:41
    important play for the city's economic
  • 13:41 - 13:43
    development plan, and that's what we have
  • 13:43 - 13:45
    been focusing on to make a huge
  • 13:45 - 13:47
    difference for our entire community. And
  • 13:47 - 13:49
    we believe that we can be the hub. This
  • 13:49 - 13:51
    doesn't replace what needs to be
  • 13:51 - 13:52
    happening throughout the community. This
  • 13:52 - 13:54
    accentuates what needs to be happening
  • 13:54 - 13:57
    throughout the community and creates a
  • 13:57 - 13:58
    hub in the middle of the city where
  • 13:58 - 14:01
    everybody can get to it for those things
  • 14:01 - 14:03
    that we can only have one up. For
  • 14:03 - 14:04
    instance, and those are the kinds of
  • 14:04 - 14:06
    things that we've been pursuing at the
  • 14:06 - 14:09
    city, we have great hopes for the medical
  • 14:09 - 14:10
    school and what it brings to that
  • 14:10 - 14:12
    district. We're thrilled that the Medical
  • 14:12 - 14:13
    Education building is going to be there,
  • 14:13 - 14:15
    and we have high hopes for additional
  • 14:15 - 14:17
    expansion in that area as the medical
  • 14:17 - 14:19
    school grows. Those are the things we're
  • 14:19 - 14:21
    focusing in on at the city of Las Vegas
  • 14:21 - 14:24
    Beautiful. Dr. Atkinson, your
  • 14:24 - 14:27
    up next. We know that the, our first class
  • 14:27 - 14:29
    at the School of Medicine is coming
  • 14:29 - 14:31
    online this summer. Could you give us a
  • 14:31 - 14:33
    taste of the kind of? What's next? What
  • 14:33 - 14:35
    are the major steps? What are you excited
  • 14:35 - 14:38
    about? Well, I'm excited about it all or
  • 14:38 - 14:40
    what I'm excited about the class. First, I
  • 14:40 - 14:43
    just have to tell you quickly, it's sixty
  • 14:43 - 14:46
    students. They're starting on July 17th,
  • 14:46 - 14:49
    they're starting with EMT training, but
  • 14:49 - 14:51
    of those 60 students. They are all from
  • 14:51 - 14:53
    Nevada or they have very strong ties to
  • 14:53 - 14:55
    Nevada we just interviewed Nevada
  • 14:55 - 14:58
    students. We had over 900 applicants and
  • 14:58 - 15:00
    300 of them were from Nevada, so we
  • 15:00 - 15:02
    didn't even have to go beyond that and
  • 15:02 - 15:06
    that's exciting in itself so they're
  • 15:06 - 15:08
    getting ready to start what we're really
  • 15:08 - 15:11
    working on this summer, too, is setting up
  • 15:11 - 15:14
    the clinical Enterprise. So, on July 1st,
  • 15:14 - 15:17
    the people who were the faculty at UNR
  • 15:17 - 15:20
    School of Medicine, which who are
  • 15:20 - 15:22
    practicing in Las Vegas are all moving
  • 15:22 - 15:25
    over to be UNLV faculty. So that's about
  • 15:25 - 15:27
    a hundred and twenty-five physicians, and
  • 15:27 - 15:31
    another 25 or so administrators and so.
  • 15:31 - 15:33
    They practice in the medical district
  • 15:33 - 15:35
    mostly. Although, they have a few other
  • 15:35 - 15:37
    sites, as well. They'll be practicing
  • 15:37 - 15:40
    under UNLV medicine starting then. And so,
  • 15:40 - 15:42
    we have to convert those practices into
  • 15:42 - 15:46
    a whole different level of care. A level
  • 15:46 - 15:48
    of care that really is one that you
  • 15:48 - 15:50
    would be proud to come to. So, that's a
  • 15:50 - 15:53
    major effort that's going on right now.
  • 15:53 - 15:55
    Recontracting everything. Everything
  • 15:55 - 15:58
    from getting telephones, EMRs, patient
  • 15:58 - 16:01
    records, ready to move over. It's a big
  • 16:01 - 16:03
    deal to move that many people besides
  • 16:03 - 16:05
    them. Moving over, they have 300 practice
  • 16:05 - 16:07
    plan employees that front desk, the
  • 16:07 - 16:09
    billing, people, everybody else. That goes
  • 16:09 - 16:11
    with the practice . They're coming over,
  • 16:11 - 16:14
    and 300 residents are moving over to
  • 16:14 - 16:17
    become, you know, UNLV residents. So we're
  • 16:17 - 16:20
    going from having about 80 faculty and
  • 16:20 - 16:22
    staff in the School of Medicine to over
  • 16:22 - 16:26
    800 on July 1st. So that's a pretty big
  • 16:26 - 16:29
    deal. That's about a quarter of what UNLV
  • 16:29 - 16:31
    is altogether. So, adding that many new
  • 16:31 - 16:35
    people is, is really exciting but the
  • 16:35 - 16:37
    practice is going to be very exciting,
  • 16:37 - 16:38
    but it'll take us a little while to get
  • 16:38 - 16:40
    it to where it needs to be beside that.
  • 16:40 - 16:43
    We're working on starting that medical
  • 16:43 - 16:45
    education building, and I have to say, the
  • 16:45 - 16:47
    city has been an incredible partner with
  • 16:47 - 16:49
    us on this and the county has as well,
  • 16:49 - 16:52
    but County gave us 9 acres of land in
  • 16:52 - 16:54
    the medical district. We've already moved
  • 16:54 - 16:56
    all our current faculty to the medical
  • 16:56 - 16:59
    district so we are clearly in the
  • 16:59 - 17:01
    medical district. Now, we are in the
  • 17:01 - 17:03
    second phase of design of the building
  • 17:03 - 17:05
    whereas you've probably read in the
  • 17:05 - 17:07
    papers, looking for our hundred million
  • 17:07 - 17:09
    dollar donor. We hope we'll be able to
  • 17:09 - 17:11
    say we have that. We hope we'll be able
  • 17:11 - 17:13
    to actually break ground on the building
  • 17:13 - 17:17
    I hope in the fall. We'll see. So that's
  • 17:17 - 17:20
    going on, and I think those are probably
  • 17:20 - 17:22
    the major efforts. We do have a research
  • 17:22 - 17:24
    effort going on, and that's one that's
  • 17:24 - 17:26
    really important for the community. It's
  • 17:26 - 17:28
    sort of trailing to a certain degree.
  • 17:28 - 17:31
    Everything else, because we did education
  • 17:31 - 17:34
    first, clinical second and research third.
  • 17:34 - 17:37
    But it's coming, we just celebrated a big
  • 17:37 - 17:42
    Mountain West conglomeration of people
  • 17:42 - 17:44
    who are all part of a research team that
  • 17:44 - 17:45
    works together to build research
  • 17:45 - 17:47
    infrastructure, and that's what's really
  • 17:47 - 17:49
    going to drive the economic piece of the
  • 17:49 - 17:52
    healthcare district. And I'll just say
  • 17:52 - 17:54
    that the projection of a Medical School
  • 17:54 - 17:59
    in a help, in a medical district with
  • 17:59 - 18:01
    everything. It brings is something like a
  • 18:01 - 18:04
    3.6 billion dollar a year. A
  • 18:04 - 18:06
    year economic benefit to the community,
  • 18:06 - 18:09
    and should have something like
  • 18:09 - 18:11
    twenty-two thousand new jobs within the
  • 18:11 - 18:14
    next 15 years. So that's what we're up to
  • 18:14 - 18:17
    awesome all right? Shelley I'm coming
  • 18:17 - 18:19
    your way actually, for the next one. So
  • 18:19 - 18:21
    Shelly, you have a unique perspective,
  • 18:21 - 18:22
    right? You've been involved in the
  • 18:22 - 18:25
    highest levels of government, and in
  • 18:25 - 18:28
    medical education, I want to ask for your
  • 18:28 - 18:30
    thoughts on one of those topics that's
  • 18:30 - 18:32
    critical, involves both those graduates in
  • 18:32 - 18:34
    Medical Education. I know our state
  • 18:34 - 18:35
    legislature in particular is taking a look
  • 18:35 - 18:38
    at this. What is it? Why do we need more
  • 18:38 - 18:40
    of it? Could you give us your thoughts on
  • 18:40 - 18:42
    that? Yeah, thank you very much. And thanks
  • 18:42 - 18:45
    for having me. Good morning, everybody.
  • 18:45 - 18:48
    GME is a very important issue and very
  • 18:48 - 18:50
    critical to the state of Nevada.
  • 18:50 - 18:54
    We are going to attract doctors and keep
  • 18:54 - 18:58
    them here when you graduate medical
  • 18:58 - 19:00
    schools. You still cannot practice
  • 19:00 - 19:02
    medicine. You have a minimum of three
  • 19:02 - 19:04
    more years of training which is your
  • 19:04 - 19:08
    residency graduates medical education
  • 19:08 - 19:12
    now. Years ago, its graduate medical
  • 19:12 - 19:15
    education dollars. How do we pay for GME,
  • 19:15 - 19:17
    comes out of Medicare funding, from the
  • 19:17 - 19:21
    feds. Years ago, it was capped, which means
  • 19:21 - 19:24
    if you're an East Coast state that has
  • 19:24 - 19:27
    lots of GME. You continued getting
  • 19:27 - 19:30
    funding for a growth state like Nevada,
  • 19:30 - 19:32
    where we've had a huge population
  • 19:32 - 19:35
    explosion. It's been devastating to us,
  • 19:35 - 19:39
    because the GME is cap. There's no
  • 19:39 - 19:41
    funding from the feds, so are very
  • 19:41 - 19:44
    limited funding, from the feds so
  • 19:44 - 19:46
    understanding that you need three more
  • 19:46 - 19:49
    years of training before you can
  • 19:49 - 19:52
    practice medicine. It is essential that
  • 19:52 - 19:56
    the state of Nevada create its own GME.
  • 19:56 - 19:59
    And so the governor, and I am very high
  • 19:59 - 20:02
    on Governor Sandoval, for a whole host of
  • 20:02 - 20:06
    reasons, but he understood that we needed
  • 20:06 - 20:09
    to create and spend some money on the
  • 20:09 - 20:13
    state level in order to create GME. So,
  • 20:13 - 20:17
    last legislative session he ensured in
  • 20:17 - 20:20
    his budget was a 10 million dollar
  • 20:20 - 20:23
    appropriation to create primary care
  • 20:23 - 20:26
    GME's. Why is that important? Because the
  • 20:26 - 20:29
    greatest shortage of doctors. Although, we
  • 20:29 - 20:31
    have shortages across the board, greatest
  • 20:31 - 20:34
    shortage of doctors is primary care
  • 20:34 - 20:39
    physicians. As consequently, we were able
  • 20:39 - 20:42
    to utilize that ten million dollars, five
  • 20:42 - 20:44
    million each year, of the biennium to
  • 20:44 - 20:48
    create Graduate Medical Education. Now, in
  • 20:48 - 20:53
    this legislative session, he again in his
  • 20:53 - 20:55
    budget was another ten million dollars.
  • 20:55 - 20:58
    I've been tracking it in the legislature
  • 20:58 - 21:01
    and the legislature; I believe when their
  • 21:01 - 21:03
    budget is put to bed the
  • 21:03 - 21:06
    ten million dollars will survive, and we
  • 21:06 - 21:08
    will be able to use it for GME it is
  • 21:08 - 21:11
    very important that it stays in primary
  • 21:11 - 21:14
    care because that is the greatest need
  • 21:14 - 21:16
    in the state of Nevada.
  • 21:16 - 21:18
    Let me quickly end with this, and it's
  • 21:18 - 21:21
    easy to understand why is GME here and
  • 21:21 - 21:25
    Nevada important because 70% of doctors
  • 21:25 - 21:28
    end up practicing where they do their
  • 21:28 - 21:31
    GME, their Graduate Medical Education. If
  • 21:31 - 21:34
    we don't have enough Graduate Medical
  • 21:34 - 21:36
    Education in the state of Nevada. These
  • 21:36 - 21:40
    young men and women these future doctors
  • 21:40 - 21:43
    end up going away, and unless they have a
  • 21:43 - 21:45
    tie with the state of Nevada. They're not
  • 21:45 - 21:47
    coming back, and it makes sense. They're
  • 21:47 - 21:49
    making contacts in the medical community.
  • 21:49 - 21:50
    They're getting married. They're
  • 21:50 - 21:53
    establishing ties in the community that
  • 21:53 - 21:55
    they're getting having their residency.
  • 21:55 - 21:59
    And a simple way to understand this: Toro
  • 21:59 - 22:02
    University graduates a hundred and
  • 22:02 - 22:05
    thirty-five future doctors every year.
  • 22:05 - 22:08
    We're very proud of that. We had 3700
  • 22:08 - 22:10
    applications for a hundred and
  • 22:10 - 22:12
    thirty-five slots this year. We can
  • 22:12 - 22:15
    afford to be very selective of who we
  • 22:15 - 22:18
    admit into our program. If we admit you,
  • 22:18 - 22:20
    we expect you to graduate, and we're
  • 22:20 - 22:22
    going to do everything we can to help
  • 22:22 - 22:27
    you. We have 30 residences will 90 but 30,
  • 22:27 - 22:31
    30, 30. Because it's 30, a year with valid
  • 22:31 - 22:33
    with the valley health system that means
  • 22:33 - 22:37
    that if we feel every residency with the
  • 22:37 - 22:40
    Toro students. A hundred and five of my
  • 22:40 - 22:43
    graduates of future doctors have to
  • 22:43 - 22:46
    leave the state of Nevada in order to
  • 22:46 - 22:49
    get their training. That is insane. And
  • 22:49 - 22:51
    Barbara and I have talked about this. A
  • 22:51 - 22:54
    lot of you could have a new medical school.
  • 22:54 - 22:55
    You could have 20 new medical schools.
  • 22:55 - 22:58
    We're all still competing for the same
  • 22:58 - 23:02
    small number of residences. Until this
  • 23:02 - 23:05
    stage gets more residences, we are not
  • 23:05 - 23:09
    not going to be able to keep doctors
  • 23:09 - 23:12
    here, and it's simple math. And it doesn't
  • 23:12 - 23:14
    take a genius to figure this out. So if
  • 23:14 - 23:16
    you ask, and maybe doing something to ask
  • 23:16 - 23:19
    later, "What can I do?" Call your legislator.
  • 23:19 - 23:22
    We know them. That's the beauty of Nevada
  • 23:22 - 23:24
    tell them to make sure that GME money,
  • 23:24 - 23:28
    primary care physicians is in the budget
  • 23:28 - 23:30
    this year. So we can start more
  • 23:30 - 23:34
    residences in the following few years so
  • 23:34 - 23:36
    important, so important audience. So there.
  • 23:36 - 23:46
    Thank you. All right, Doug. You're up next
  • 23:46 - 23:47
    want to hop into your world for a little
  • 23:47 - 23:50
    bit the audience when they leave today,
  • 23:50 - 23:51
    they're going to look at that community
  • 23:51 - 23:53
    map, and they're going to see hospitals,
  • 23:53 - 23:56
    clinics springing up all over the valley.
  • 23:56 - 23:59
    Could you tell us a little bit striving
  • 23:59 - 24:00
    this trend? Maybe share a few examples.
  • 24:00 - 24:03
    Sure. So it's a lot of things during the
  • 24:03 - 24:06
    Great Recession. We went into that under
  • 24:06 - 24:08
    bedded as a community. We just flat out
  • 24:08 - 24:11
    did not have a bed enough beds to serve
  • 24:11 - 24:13
    the community. The tear during that
  • 24:13 - 24:17
    recession our unemployment rates went up.
  • 24:17 - 24:20
    Therefore, our uninsured what not. So a
  • 24:20 - 24:22
    lot of folks just didn't have access to
  • 24:22 - 24:26
    care because of that we were the first
  • 24:26 - 24:28
    state or the first republican governor
  • 24:28 - 24:30
    that approved the expansion of Medicaid
  • 24:30 - 24:33
    through the Affordable Care Act that
  • 24:33 - 24:36
    brought in 300,000 new additionally
  • 24:36 - 24:39
    insured so these 300,000 needed a place
  • 24:39 - 24:42
    to access care and what that's it. Is it
  • 24:42 - 24:44
    also provided a patient that would
  • 24:44 - 24:46
    present themselves at the hospitals that
  • 24:46 - 24:50
    now had a payer source not quite at the
  • 24:50 - 24:52
    level that they need to to be profitable?
  • 24:52 - 24:54
    But they had a payer source attached to
  • 24:54 - 24:56
    them, so everybody started growing again.
  • 24:56 - 24:57
    At the same time, some other things
  • 24:57 - 25:00
    happen where they started. They corrected
  • 25:00 - 25:01
    the reimbursement rate for inpatient
  • 25:01 - 25:03
    behavioral health, so you saw some
  • 25:03 - 25:06
    readjustment around the community. So now,
  • 25:06 - 25:08
    you're watching all of these facilities
  • 25:08 - 25:11
    and all these systems grow. I think a lot
  • 25:11 - 25:12
    of the growth that's going on in the
  • 25:12 - 25:14
    medical district and with the UNLV
  • 25:14 - 25:16
    School of Medicine is going to continue
  • 25:16 - 25:20
    and we're building out now to embrace
  • 25:20 - 25:22
    and be prepared for a major
  • 25:22 - 25:25
    transformation into academic medicine. So
  • 25:25 - 25:27
    as that happens and more residents are
  • 25:27 - 25:29
    coming through, and 70% of those are
  • 25:29 - 25:30
    staying here.
  • 25:30 - 25:31
    They're going to be opening up practices.
  • 25:31 - 25:34
    Then we'll start developing specialty
  • 25:34 - 25:35
    and subspecialty programs and fellowship
  • 25:35 - 25:39
    programs to bring on the the access to
  • 25:39 - 25:41
    care that we desperately need. You're
  • 25:41 - 25:44
    seeing other systems such as yesterday,
  • 25:44 - 25:45
    there's a great presentation from the
  • 25:45 - 25:48
    folks from Union Village in Henderson
  • 25:48 - 25:49
    Hospital. That was a hospital that was
  • 25:49 - 25:50
    opened up just a year ago, and they're
  • 25:50 - 25:53
    already expanding they're already at
  • 25:53 - 25:56
    that capacity. Every single Hospital in
  • 25:56 - 25:58
    this town is growing at some rate
  • 25:58 - 25:59
    whether it's Centennial, Spring Valley,
  • 25:59 - 26:02
    Mountain View, Sunrise is building a new
  • 26:02 - 26:04
    tower. You're seeing the introduction of
  • 26:04 - 26:06
    stand-alone ERs. You're seeing the
  • 26:06 - 26:09
    introduction of community hospitals or
  • 26:09 - 26:12
    micro hospitals, and this is all
  • 26:12 - 26:14
    improving access to care because we all
  • 26:14 - 26:17
    want to access care whereas closest to
  • 26:17 - 26:20
    where we live. And you're going to see a
  • 26:20 - 26:21
    huge transformation that's for years to
  • 26:21 - 26:22
    come.
  • 26:22 - 26:24
    So I think it's an exciting time for
  • 26:24 - 26:26
    medicine in Las Vegas. I think the great
  • 26:26 - 26:28
    work that's being done by our governor
  • 26:28 - 26:29
    with the expansion of Graduate Medical
  • 26:29 - 26:31
    Education, what's happening with you and
  • 26:31 - 26:33
    I'll be medicine. What's going on at the
  • 26:33 - 26:36
    medical district? Health care is now top
  • 26:36 - 26:39
    of mind, and tip of tongue. It's happening.
  • 26:39 - 26:40
    It's growing and it's driving this
  • 26:40 - 26:42
    community and it's going to require
  • 26:42 - 26:45
    strengthening that healthcare pillar for
  • 26:45 - 26:47
    true economic diversification to happen
  • 26:47 - 26:49
    because, as we're trying to recruit
  • 26:49 - 26:51
    attract and expand companies to come
  • 26:51 - 26:55
    here. Those executives want to offer
  • 26:55 - 26:58
    their family, their executives, families
  • 26:58 - 26:59
    and all of their employees, and their
  • 26:59 - 27:01
    families good health care, and good
  • 27:01 - 27:03
    education. And so I think the healthcare
  • 27:03 - 27:05
    community has really come together to
  • 27:05 - 27:07
    help provide that part of the equation
  • 27:07 - 27:09
    beautiful, beautiful. All right, panel. I'm
  • 27:09 - 27:11
    going to open up the next question to
  • 27:11 - 27:13
    everybody. This is a little bit of a hot
  • 27:13 - 27:17
    button issue: reimbursement rates. Could
  • 27:17 - 27:19
    you guys could you tell us about what's
  • 27:19 - 27:20
    going on with reimbursement rates? How do
  • 27:20 - 27:23
    we stack up to other markets? Why is it
  • 27:23 - 27:25
    important? What can we do about it?
  • 27:25 - 27:28
    So I'll jump in there. Sorry to hog the
  • 27:28 - 27:31
    microphone a little bit, and a little bit
  • 27:31 - 27:35
    of a selfish plug. So Las Vegas Heals has
  • 27:35 - 27:37
    a reimbursement survey out on the street.
  • 27:37 - 27:39
    We partnered up with the LVGEA on this.
  • 27:39 - 27:41
    So,
  • 27:41 - 27:43
    let me explain why reimbursements is so
  • 27:43 - 27:46
    important economic development really is
  • 27:46 - 27:49
    job creation, okay, and workforce
  • 27:49 - 27:50
    development. It's what it comes down to.
  • 27:50 - 27:53
    In workforce development, you've got two
  • 27:53 - 27:55
    parts of that equation recruitment of a
  • 27:55 - 27:58
    workforce and retention of a workforce.
  • 27:58 - 28:01
    We have worked extremely hard over the
  • 28:01 - 28:03
    course of the last four years to expand
  • 28:03 - 28:06
    our physician pipeline. So, the expansion
  • 28:06 - 28:08
    of Graduate Medical Education to put
  • 28:08 - 28:10
    some perspective to that we're going
  • 28:10 - 28:12
    from programs existing in three
  • 28:12 - 28:13
    hospitals by the end of this year. We
  • 28:13 - 28:15
    should probably have programs and 12
  • 28:15 - 28:19
    hospitals, which is gigantic. And so we've
  • 28:19 - 28:22
    spent all this time developing this
  • 28:22 - 28:23
    pipeline of physicians with the new
  • 28:23 - 28:25
    Medical School with the expansion of
  • 28:25 - 28:27
    Toro and everything that's going on we
  • 28:27 - 28:29
    now need to focus our attention to the
  • 28:29 - 28:30
    retention part of the equation and
  • 28:30 - 28:34
    that's keeping them here. And the
  • 28:34 - 28:36
    residency programs get them here. What
  • 28:36 - 28:39
    keeps doctors here is their pay, and
  • 28:39 - 28:42
    their pay is directly tied to
  • 28:42 - 28:45
    reimbursement rates? So if we are not
  • 28:45 - 28:47
    reimbursing them adequately all of this
  • 28:47 - 28:49
    infrastructure that we've been building
  • 28:49 - 28:51
    over the last five years is for naught.
  • 28:51 - 28:54
    So, we have to get this part of the
  • 28:54 - 28:57
    equation right? Nevada, as a whole, is one
  • 28:57 - 28:59
    of the worst reimburse markets in the
  • 28:59 - 29:03
    entire country, so physicians have the
  • 29:03 - 29:05
    choice because they're in demand
  • 29:05 - 29:08
    everywhere. The physician shortage is not
  • 29:08 - 29:11
    just in Nevada. It is in every single
  • 29:11 - 29:14
    state and so doctors have choices where
  • 29:14 - 29:16
    they could live and when they could go
  • 29:16 - 29:18
    to a neighboring states, and they could
  • 29:18 - 29:21
    earn 40 percent more and see less
  • 29:21 - 29:23
    patients and do what they truly care
  • 29:23 - 29:24
    about. And is delivering exceptional
  • 29:24 - 29:27
    patient care spending time with the
  • 29:27 - 29:29
    patient's they could choose where
  • 29:29 - 29:31
    they're going to go. So in order for
  • 29:31 - 29:33
    Nevada to have a competitive advantage,
  • 29:33 - 29:36
    we must address reimbursement rates. If
  • 29:36 - 29:38
    we don't get that right, we're going to
  • 29:38 - 29:45
    have serious serious challenges. Well,
  • 29:46 - 29:49
    my husband is a nephrologist. They
  • 29:49 - 29:51
    when I first started dating him, I
  • 29:51 - 29:53
    thought that was sex with dead people.
  • 29:53 - 30:00
    It's not. It's, he's a gay doctor, thank
  • 30:00 - 30:03
    God. A kid and Ragnar and my stepdaughter
  • 30:03 - 30:06
    is a primary care physician. So we do
  • 30:06 - 30:08
    health care in our family. It's a very
  • 30:08 - 30:11
    simple thing and just get on it.
  • 30:11 - 30:13
    Reimbursement is important because
  • 30:13 - 30:15
    doctors like to eat and support their
  • 30:15 - 30:18
    families and if the reimbursement rates
  • 30:18 - 30:20
    are low they are going to go elsewhere
  • 30:20 - 30:23
    but it also has a lot to do with the
  • 30:23 - 30:25
    insurance companies who are negotiating
  • 30:25 - 30:29
    the rates with the doctors and because
  • 30:29 - 30:34
    there is very few choices of private
  • 30:34 - 30:38
    health insurers. The insurance companies
  • 30:38 - 30:41
    can pretty well determine what they are
  • 30:41 - 30:43
    going to pay for the services if the
  • 30:43 - 30:46
    doctor wants to be in their network. And
  • 30:46 - 30:49
    so, my husband is a managing doctor of
  • 30:49 - 30:52
    his group. There's 33 doctors. 700
  • 30:52 - 30:54
    employees in his group. It's a big
  • 30:54 - 30:57
    practice, but when he is dealing with the
  • 30:57 - 30:59
    insurance companies they are offering to
  • 30:59 - 31:01
    reimburse them 50 percent of Medicare,
  • 31:01 - 31:05
    which is pathetic. Anyway, Medicare is one
  • 31:05 - 31:07
    of his high pays, not one of his low pays.
  • 31:07 - 31:09
    And you know, they could look, you know,
  • 31:09 - 31:12
    we just going to deal with your
  • 31:12 - 31:17
    competitor, and we're giving them 50. 50
  • 31:17 - 31:19
    percent of Medicare. You want it or you
  • 31:19 - 31:21
    don't want it. Now Larry's groups going
  • 31:21 - 31:23
    to want to be part of that Network, too.
  • 31:23 - 31:26
    So those primary care physicians can
  • 31:26 - 31:29
    refer their patient to whoever,
  • 31:29 - 31:32
    whatever doctors in that network. So it
  • 31:32 - 31:35
    has a lot to do with lack of competition
  • 31:35 - 31:38
    with insurance companies offering this
  • 31:38 - 31:42
    type of insurance medical insurance to
  • 31:42 - 31:46
    our so, I guess, our fellow citizens.
  • 31:46 - 31:47
    That's huge.
  • 31:47 - 31:49
    Another thing that is going to be
  • 31:49 - 31:54
    devastating for this state if President
  • 31:54 - 31:57
    Trump's proposal to cut eight hundred
  • 31:57 - 31:59
    billion dollars out of men,
  • 31:59 - 32:01
    the cave goes through. I sincerely doubt
  • 32:01 - 32:04
    it will. It is going to be devastating
  • 32:04 - 32:07
    for the state of Nevada because that's
  • 32:07 - 32:10
    how poor people get their services and
  • 32:10 - 32:11
    it's important to know this. In
  • 32:11 - 32:14
    conclusion, just because you don't have
  • 32:14 - 32:17
    health insurance doesn't mean you don't
  • 32:17 - 32:20
    get sick. You wait until you get really
  • 32:20 - 32:22
    sick and you end up in the emergency
  • 32:22 - 32:25
    rooms of the hospital. What is the most
  • 32:25 - 32:29
    expensive type of treatment? Emergency
  • 32:29 - 32:31
    room treatment and there is a reason
  • 32:31 - 32:34
    that UMC is no longer having 70 million
  • 32:34 - 32:37
    dollar yearly deficits. They're not in
  • 32:37 - 32:40
    the red anymore, and that's because
  • 32:40 - 32:44
    Obamacare expanded Medicaid. Governor
  • 32:44 - 32:47
    Sandoval agreed that they should that
  • 32:47 - 32:49
    the state of Nevada should expand its
  • 32:49 - 32:51
    Medicaid program and as the
  • 32:51 - 32:54
    reimbursement from the feds gets lower
  • 32:54 - 32:57
    and lower the cost to the taxpayers of
  • 32:57 - 33:00
    the state of Nevada is going to rise and
  • 33:00 - 33:03
    rise and rise. It could be a big budget
  • 33:03 - 33:07
    buster, and for somebody like Barbara, who
  • 33:07 - 33:10
    needs those state dollar, of course. Itoro
  • 33:10 - 33:12
    doesn't take any state or federal money.
  • 33:12 - 33:19
    However, for yes for a medical school
  • 33:19 - 33:22
    that's dependent on state funding, the
  • 33:22 - 33:25
    fact that Medicaid is going to be cut is
  • 33:25 - 33:27
    really going to hurt, that they're going
  • 33:27 - 33:29
    to have to make up the shortfall and
  • 33:29 - 33:32
    things like UNLV Medical School. And so
  • 33:32 - 33:34
    many other programs that we as citizens
  • 33:34 - 33:37
    expect from our government aren't going
  • 33:37 - 33:39
    to are going to be cut because this is a
  • 33:39 - 33:42
    low tax state and our fellow citizens
  • 33:42 - 33:46
    don't want their taxes increased, alright.
  • 33:46 - 33:49
    Thank you, thank you. We've got so many
  • 33:49 - 33:50
    more questions that I want to ask, but
  • 33:50 - 33:52
    it's important that we open it up to you
  • 33:52 - 33:55
    guys. So this is a segment where, let's
  • 33:55 - 33:56
    see if we can't fit in some questions
  • 33:56 - 33:59
    from Twitter. And then we're going to
  • 33:59 - 34:03
    have a roving microphone as well
  • 34:03 - 34:07
    Twitter's not working okay.
  • 34:07 - 34:09
    Our feed is not working, all right. What's
  • 34:09 - 34:14
    the visit? This is good to know. So from
  • 34:14 - 34:16
    the audience, do we have a question for
  • 34:16 - 34:21
    this panel? Anybody will come get you
  • 34:21 - 34:24
    with a microphone while you're waiting. Can
  • 34:24 - 34:27
    I make it? Yeah, all right. Rebuttal. A
  • 34:27 - 34:31
    little carrot. I just don't want to
  • 34:31 - 34:33
    leave the audience with something that I
  • 34:33 - 34:35
    think is a misconception. I agree with
  • 34:35 - 34:37
    Shelley on almost everything and for
  • 34:37 - 34:40
    sure on the GME, we absolutely need it
  • 34:40 - 34:42
    and it is in the governor's budget. So
  • 34:42 - 34:44
    and it does look like it's going through.
  • 34:44 - 34:47
    What I disagree with is that primary
  • 34:47 - 34:49
    care is all we need. We need specialty
  • 34:49 - 34:52
    care in this city as well. You do one
  • 34:52 - 34:54
    first, and then the other, and you're
  • 34:54 - 34:56
    right. We need to both make money from
  • 34:56 - 34:58
    primary care. And you don't get the
  • 34:58 - 35:01
    pipeline that refers, Let me just tell
  • 35:01 - 35:03
    you why we need specialties now too,
  • 35:03 - 35:06
    because almost half of the students that
  • 35:06 - 35:09
    that went to Reno University of
  • 35:09 - 35:12
    Nevada-reno School of Medicine left the
  • 35:12 - 35:14
    state because the specialty training
  • 35:14 - 35:17
    they wanted isn't given in the state so
  • 35:17 - 35:20
    to actually fix the students leaving the
  • 35:20 - 35:21
    state. They have to have specialty
  • 35:21 - 35:24
    residents, and if you look at the medical
  • 35:24 - 35:25
    care that's missing. It's the highest
  • 35:25 - 35:27
    level of medical care that doesn't exist
  • 35:27 - 35:30
    at all things like liver transplants,
  • 35:30 - 35:32
    bone marrow transplants, pancreas
  • 35:32 - 35:35
    transplants, a heart failure program was
  • 35:35 - 35:38
    an external pump. Those are all programs
  • 35:38 - 35:40
    that need to be here in Las Vegas, and
  • 35:40 - 35:41
    you shouldn't have to leave even
  • 35:41 - 35:43
    insurance companies have to pay to send
  • 35:43 - 35:45
    people out of state for those kinds of
  • 35:45 - 35:48
    things. So we really need the other
  • 35:48 - 35:50
    residences, and just to tell you what
  • 35:50 - 35:52
    residences are missing in this state.
  • 35:52 - 35:54
    Some very basic things like in
  • 35:54 - 35:56
    nephrology fellowship, for one, is missing.
  • 35:56 - 35:59
    But things like dermatology,
  • 35:59 - 36:02
    ophthalmology, neurosurgery, cardiac
  • 36:02 - 36:06
    surgery, orthopedics just started. So we
  • 36:06 - 36:10
    now have that all of the radiology,
  • 36:10 - 36:13
    anesthesia, pathology, radiation, oncology,
  • 36:13 - 36:15
    I could probably name a lot more and
  • 36:15 - 36:17
    there's not a single pediatric
  • 36:17 - 36:18
    fellowship.
  • 36:18 - 36:21
    Only three medicine fellowship. So if you
  • 36:21 - 36:23
    want to, there's no oncology cancer
  • 36:23 - 36:26
    fellowships. So all of those need to be
  • 36:26 - 36:29
    built in this city and as fast as they
  • 36:29 - 36:31
    can be built and I will say that
  • 36:31 - 36:33
    depending on what charts you look at if
  • 36:33 - 36:35
    you look at a national average of
  • 36:35 - 36:38
    specialty versus primary care were more
  • 36:38 - 36:41
    scarce in specialties. If you look at
  • 36:41 - 36:43
    the Mountain West which includes things
  • 36:43 - 36:46
    like Idaho, Wyoming, in Montana
  • 36:46 - 36:49
    primary care is more comparing us to
  • 36:49 - 36:52
    them is really more in demand. But it
  • 36:52 - 36:53
    just goes to show that their region as a
  • 36:53 - 36:55
    whole needs more specialty care. So
  • 36:55 - 36:57
    couldn't leave it without that super
  • 36:57 - 36:59
    important. And in four years, when you
  • 36:59 - 37:02
    graduate your first class. Barbara, I
  • 37:02 - 37:04
    think, we should start those specialties
  • 37:04 - 37:06
    right. Now, let's get the primary care
  • 37:06 - 37:09
    physicians, what? Let's be real. We need
  • 37:09 - 37:11
    all of them, and we need them all now. So
  • 37:11 - 37:13
    please, talk to the governor. Talk to your
  • 37:13 - 37:15
    legislators. Let's get the GME funded,
  • 37:15 - 37:17
    Let's get the Medical School funded, and
  • 37:17 - 37:19
    let's just get this done. So people quit
  • 37:19 - 37:21
    getting on the airplane to go get their
  • 37:21 - 37:24
    care, that should not be OK for us in
  • 37:24 - 37:26
    this city anymore. And all of these
  • 37:26 - 37:28
    people are completely dedicated to
  • 37:28 - 37:31
    turning that ship around, but it takes
  • 37:31 - 37:36
    every citizen to care and act that is
  • 37:36 - 37:39
    the perfect summary. A transition to you.
  • 37:39 - 37:41
    Guys, we do have a question from the
  • 37:41 - 37:42
    audience.
  • 37:42 - 37:45
    Team. Yup. There we go all right. Fire away.
  • 37:45 - 37:47
    Rachel's all Mesquite Regional Business.
  • 37:47 - 37:50
    We're about an hour east of here, and we
  • 37:50 - 37:52
    feel the same way except people get in
  • 37:52 - 37:54
    their car and come here for medical care.
  • 37:54 - 37:56
    So is there going to be an effort to
  • 37:56 - 37:58
    reach out to rural Clark County
  • 37:58 - 38:01
    communities? Can we have some residences
  • 38:01 - 38:04
    in Mesquite, in Boulder City, and Laughlin,
  • 38:04 - 38:08
    and some of our other partners? I can
  • 38:08 - 38:10
    start out saying that I think the big
  • 38:10 - 38:12
    the biggest thing that could help rural
  • 38:12 - 38:14
    Clark County, and rural Nevada is
  • 38:14 - 38:16
    telemedicine, and I think that's really
  • 38:16 - 38:18
    the thing of the future, and that's
  • 38:18 - 38:21
    something that's really good for urban
  • 38:21 - 38:24
    areas too. For follow-up, you need to be
  • 38:24 - 38:27
    see a doctor in person the first time,
  • 38:27 - 38:29
    but often for follow-up especially with
  • 38:29 - 38:31
    chronic diseases, it could happen in your
  • 38:31 - 38:31
    home,
  • 38:31 - 38:35
    and save you the drive and save you, save
  • 38:35 - 38:37
    you, the parking and so on.
  • 38:37 - 38:40
    Let the echo what Barbara is saying, Kuro
  • 38:40 - 38:42
    is very aggressively moving into
  • 38:42 - 38:45
    telemedicine. I think it is very
  • 38:45 - 38:48
    important if there are not enough health
  • 38:48 - 38:50
    care providers, and there are not in the
  • 38:50 - 38:54
    state of Nevada. See a very good way. It's
  • 38:54 - 38:58
    not the ideal perfect way, but a very
  • 38:58 - 39:00
    good way to access healthcare and to
  • 39:00 - 39:03
    speak to a health care provider is
  • 39:03 - 39:05
    through telemedicine. So, we are also
  • 39:05 - 39:07
    moving in that direction very very
  • 39:07 - 39:12
    rapidly and very aggressively. Excellent.
  • 39:12 - 39:15
    I know we're running short on time so
  • 39:15 - 39:17
    we're going to cut cut this segment
  • 39:17 - 39:19
    short. And give this group a huge round
  • 39:19 - 39:25
    of applause? Can you join me? Thank you so
  • 39:25 - 39:37
    much, all right. I hope you can see how
  • 39:37 - 39:39
    critical healthcare is to our economy,
  • 39:39 - 39:41
    and to really to our community and
  • 39:41 - 39:43
    getting to that next level. I hope you
  • 39:43 - 39:46
    learn something there. We're going to
  • 39:46 - 39:50
    move on to our first keynote, and I want
  • 39:50 - 39:53
    to introduce this by saying a friend
  • 39:53 - 39:55
    once told me, "You'll know when you
  • 39:55 - 39:59
    arrived in Las Vegas when Jeremy agüero
  • 39:59 - 40:03
    considers you a friend," right? I believe
  • 40:03 - 40:06
    that that's kind of true and I'm proud
  • 40:06 - 40:09
    to say Jeremy, I consider you a friend.
  • 40:09 - 40:12
    You're one of the smartest people I know.
  • 40:12 - 40:14
    This is the presentation that I know you
  • 40:14 - 40:17
    guys really keep coming back for year
  • 40:17 - 40:19
    after year. That makes perspective. Great,
  • 40:19 - 40:21
    let's give a warm welcome to Jeremy
  • 40:21 - 40:25
    Agüero with a plot analysis.
  • 40:27 - 40:31
    [Music]
  • 40:31 - 40:34
    Good morning. I appreciate everybody
  • 40:34 - 40:37
    being here today as Jonas, my very good
  • 40:37 - 40:42
    friend, indicated my job is to come up
  • 40:42 - 40:43
    here and provide you somewhat of an
  • 40:43 - 40:45
    overview in terms of where we are as an
  • 40:45 - 40:46
    economy. And where we think that were
  • 40:46 - 40:47
    ultimately heading. Before I do that,
  • 40:47 - 40:49
    Jonas was so nice to say thank you to
  • 40:49 - 40:51
    our firm and the other sponsors that we
  • 40:51 - 40:53
    have and everyone being here. But he
  • 40:53 - 40:56
    would never be so presumptive is to say
  • 40:56 - 40:58
    to mention the LVGEA and all the
  • 40:58 - 41:00
    wonderful things that they do and their
  • 41:00 - 41:01
    entire staff does to put on this event.
  • 41:01 - 41:09
    Please give them a round in developing
  • 41:09 - 41:11
    my presentation today. The title of my
  • 41:11 - 41:13
    presentation is Coming Full Circle. It
  • 41:13 - 41:15
    occurs to me that our community is going
  • 41:15 - 41:17
    through some unique brand approach
  • 41:17 - 41:21
    traumatic stress. Excuse me, yeah. Me too.
  • 41:21 - 41:24
    Post-traumatic stress disorder in terms
  • 41:24 - 41:26
    of this ability to start to
  • 41:26 - 41:27
    conceptualize the fact that our economy
  • 41:27 - 41:29
    is no longer in recession that we're
  • 41:29 - 41:30
    starting to move forward, and the
  • 41:30 - 41:31
    questions that I get are relatively
  • 41:31 - 41:34
    similar. Hey look. What's going to happen
  • 41:34 - 41:35
    next? When are we going to fall off this
  • 41:35 - 41:38
    cliff? Are we growing too fast? This means
  • 41:38 - 41:39
    we're getting out over our skis. Are we
  • 41:39 - 41:41
    just setting ourselves up to happen
  • 41:41 - 41:43
    again? Should I invest? All of those type
  • 41:43 - 41:45
    of things seem to be this recurring set
  • 41:45 - 41:47
    of questions. And so, I'd like to take
  • 41:47 - 41:48
    some time to put some of those arrests.
  • 41:48 - 41:50
    And I understand why we got to this
  • 41:50 - 41:53
    point. Let's not forget about all of the
  • 41:53 - 41:55
    articles that came out for the better,
  • 41:55 - 41:57
    part of a five-year period right?
  • 41:57 - 41:59
    Crowds returned but we're no one's going
  • 41:59 - 42:02
    to gamble the housing market continues
  • 42:02 - 42:05
    to slide Las Vegas economy, absolutely in
  • 42:05 - 42:07
    freefall. My personal favorite, Las Vegas
  • 42:07 - 42:10
    economy, among the worst in the world
  • 42:10 - 42:14
    report, says now I can think of lots of
  • 42:14 - 42:17
    places on planet Earth many of them end.
  • 42:17 - 42:21
    With something like Tajikistan, you
  • 42:21 - 42:23
    know, whatever that I don't even ever
  • 42:23 - 42:25
    believe that we are the worst on planet
  • 42:25 - 42:28
    earth. And then the other one that was
  • 42:28 - 42:30
    out there was, of course, Las Vegas from
  • 42:30 - 42:32
    Time magazine, where Joel Stein called
  • 42:32 - 42:36
    Las Vegas the world's greatest ghost
  • 42:36 - 42:36
    town
  • 42:36 - 42:39
    in waiting. Right? This is why we continue
  • 42:39 - 42:42
    to have this type of concern, and I get
  • 42:42 - 42:45
    it I get that the economic downturn was
  • 42:45 - 42:47
    significant. I get that it created a lot
  • 42:47 - 42:49
    of stress for us in here. But the fact
  • 42:49 - 42:52
    that this room is filled with so many
  • 42:52 - 42:54
    familiar faces among people who found a
  • 42:54 - 42:56
    way to make it work. I think is something
  • 42:56 - 42:58
    we should be very proud of. And I think
  • 42:58 - 43:00
    being realistic about where we are is
  • 43:00 - 43:03
    important because this community will
  • 43:03 - 43:06
    not be judged, based on our ability to
  • 43:06 - 43:09
    survive a recession our community will
  • 43:09 - 43:12
    be judged on the ability to sustain our
  • 43:12 - 43:14
    prosperity. That is what you heard today,
  • 43:14 - 43:17
    and that is what we need to do as a
  • 43:17 - 43:19
    community. I'm going to start with
  • 43:19 - 43:21
    population growth because our community
  • 43:21 - 43:24
    is geared for exactly that we are
  • 43:24 - 43:26
    designed to grow. We have been among the
  • 43:26 - 43:29
    nation's fastest growing for decades and
  • 43:29 - 43:30
    decades and decades. And here we are
  • 43:30 - 43:33
    still again. what I'd like to do is just
  • 43:33 - 43:35
    show you the population growth during
  • 43:35 - 43:37
    sort of a boom period. And then you see
  • 43:37 - 43:38
    that it sort of flattens out a little
  • 43:38 - 43:41
    bit, and here we are again. And today, we
  • 43:41 - 43:45
    are a community of 2.2 million people
  • 43:45 - 43:48
    overall. 2.2 million people call this
  • 43:48 - 43:49
    place home.
  • 43:49 - 43:50
    Now it's the same 500 people that you
  • 43:50 - 43:53
    see everywhere you go. I get that, okay.
  • 43:53 - 43:56
    But there really are 2.2 million people
  • 43:56 - 43:58
    have physically live in this community.
  • 43:58 - 44:00
    Now, I went relatively fast to this and
  • 44:00 - 44:02
    if I was to go back through it. You'd see
  • 44:02 - 44:03
    that the demographics, and I'll go
  • 44:03 - 44:05
    backward because my guys were so nice to
  • 44:05 - 44:07
    create this. If you look on the right
  • 44:07 - 44:09
    side of my chart, that's the shares in
  • 44:09 - 44:11
    terms of races in terms of our
  • 44:11 - 44:13
    demographics if you will. And we look at
  • 44:13 - 44:15
    2000, and then we look at 2006. And then
  • 44:15 - 44:17
    we look at 2012, and then where we are
  • 44:17 - 44:19
    today, we are becoming increasingly
  • 44:19 - 44:22
    diverse. We are minority-majority. All of
  • 44:22 - 44:24
    those type of things this diversity is
  • 44:24 - 44:27
    what makes our community great. It is
  • 44:27 - 44:29
    part of who we are. It is the fabric of
  • 44:29 - 44:31
    our society, and there is nothing wrong
  • 44:31 - 44:33
    with it. As a matter of fact, we only
  • 44:33 - 44:35
    today are starting to embrace that and
  • 44:35 - 44:37
    carry it forward. These are the 35
  • 44:37 - 44:40
    largest metropolitan areas in the United
  • 44:40 - 44:42
    States. We are the third fastest growing
  • 44:42 - 44:44
    of all of them, not a bad place to be.
  • 44:44 - 44:47
    Where are newcomers coming from? There's
  • 44:47 - 44:49
    no surprise here. Who want to think about
  • 44:49 - 44:49
    it in terms of full
  • 44:49 - 44:52
    circle. Yes, people did not move to
  • 44:52 - 44:54
    Southern Nevada when the economy was
  • 44:54 - 44:55
    going down? Why did they not move because
  • 44:55 - 44:57
    they weren't moving anywhere because
  • 44:57 - 44:59
    their house was underwater. That's why
  • 44:59 - 45:01
    people weren't moving. And now they're
  • 45:01 - 45:03
    moving again, and guess where they're
  • 45:03 - 45:05
    coming from, excuse me, California.
  • 45:05 - 45:07
    Because it's the seventh largest economy
  • 45:07 - 45:09
    on planet Earth and people can't get out
  • 45:09 - 45:11
    of there fast enough. All of which is
  • 45:11 - 45:13
    fine right? But it's benefiting us but
  • 45:13 - 45:15
    more important than this idea of full
  • 45:15 - 45:18
    circle is how we've changed in that.
  • 45:18 - 45:19
    Let's just take a look at what those
  • 45:19 - 45:21
    newcomer trends look like throughout the
  • 45:21 - 45:24
    years in 2000. Look at what the income
  • 45:24 - 45:26
    level was. Look at the age of people
  • 45:26 - 45:28
    moving in. What we know is that today
  • 45:28 - 45:31
    people are moving into our community to
  • 45:31 - 45:33
    find jobs that are at a higher level and
  • 45:33 - 45:35
    they're bringing more income with them.
  • 45:35 - 45:37
    They're also bringing more home equity
  • 45:37 - 45:39
    with them, and surprisingly enough, there
  • 45:39 - 45:41
    actually appears to be some
  • 45:41 - 45:43
    Millennials that are moving out of their
  • 45:43 - 45:45
    parents house because they appear to be
  • 45:45 - 45:48
    moving here right? If you look at the far
  • 45:48 - 45:50
    right at 2016, the age at which people
  • 45:50 - 45:53
    are moving in is dropping for every
  • 45:53 - 45:55
    reason and the LVGEA has been absolutely
  • 45:55 - 45:57
    a leader on. This is the reality that we
  • 45:57 - 46:00
    cannot create as many professionals as
  • 46:00 - 46:02
    we need in this community.
  • 46:02 - 46:03
    Things like GME and others are
  • 46:03 - 46:05
    essentially a roadblock until we are
  • 46:05 - 46:07
    going to have to attract talent
  • 46:07 - 46:09
    particularly from around the western
  • 46:09 - 46:11
    United States. And they're coming here,
  • 46:11 - 46:13
    and they're coming here because we offer
  • 46:13 - 46:17
    a better way of life overall. If we
  • 46:17 - 46:19
    transition from this idea of population
  • 46:19 - 46:22
    to this concept of employment, right. The
  • 46:22 - 46:24
    number one motivation for people moving
  • 46:24 - 46:26
    into our community as it has been for
  • 46:26 - 46:28
    most of the past 37 years has been this
  • 46:28 - 46:31
    idea of finding a job, probably much
  • 46:31 - 46:34
    longer than that. But it is this idea of
  • 46:34 - 46:37
    finding a job and if we look at how we
  • 46:37 - 46:38
    are creating jobs, and where we've been
  • 46:38 - 46:41
    this idea of sort of coming all the way
  • 46:41 - 46:43
    back around. This is what job growth
  • 46:43 - 46:45
    looked in 2007. Most of the folks here
  • 46:45 - 46:48
    remember what 2007 was like. Jobs were
  • 46:48 - 46:50
    plentiful, the unemployment rate was
  • 46:50 - 46:53
    approaching 4%. Everybody that wanted a
  • 46:53 - 46:55
    job could find a job except perhaps for
  • 46:55 - 46:58
    my brother-in-law. And it was
  • 46:58 - 47:00
    fine, right. It was good right. We were
  • 47:00 - 47:02
    growing at 4.3%, we
  • 47:02 - 47:02
    were the
  • 47:02 - 47:04
    we were the fifth fastest growing
  • 47:04 - 47:06
    metropolitan area, excuse me, states in
  • 47:06 - 47:08
    the nation. And here we look at a 2011,
  • 47:08 - 47:10
    when the world is kind of coming apart,
  • 47:10 - 47:14
    and only North Dakota has positive
  • 47:14 - 47:16
    growth right. You know, yeah. There's a lot
  • 47:16 - 47:17
    of jokes there. We'll just leave it, leave
  • 47:17 - 47:20
    it there. And then you look at 2017, and
  • 47:20 - 47:23
    here we are again here we are again at
  • 47:23 - 47:26
    the now the third fastest growing state
  • 47:26 - 47:28
    in the entire United States. And that's
  • 47:28 - 47:31
    great, and that full circle is what is
  • 47:31 - 47:33
    important to us. But the nature of it,
  • 47:33 - 47:35
    what is underlying, it is the reason that
  • 47:35 - 47:38
    we can at least exhale a little bit, and
  • 47:38 - 47:40
    say we are learning to do it better as
  • 47:40 - 47:42
    we go forward. Let's just talk about that
  • 47:42 - 47:44
    for a moment. Now, here's the
  • 47:44 - 47:47
    pre-recession growth in employment for
  • 47:47 - 47:48
    the top 35 MSA.
  • 47:48 - 47:51
    I guess I should show this in advance of
  • 47:51 - 47:53
    showing how we're changing to make sure
  • 47:53 - 47:54
    that I'm showing sort of an apples to
  • 47:54 - 47:56
    apples comparison. So we were just
  • 47:56 - 47:58
    looking at states we're now looking at
  • 47:58 - 48:00
    MSA, is you can see there's only one
  • 48:00 - 48:03
    large MSA now to the right of us. In 2007
  • 48:03 - 48:06
    we're dead last in the among large MSA.
  • 48:06 - 48:09
    And in 2011, and here we are today at
  • 48:09 - 48:13
    about three a little over 3% employment
  • 48:13 - 48:14
    growth, which I'm sure my good friends at
  • 48:14 - 48:16
    the Nevada Department of Employment
  • 48:16 - 48:17
    training and rehabilitation, that are
  • 48:17 - 48:19
    here today will tell you that is pretty
  • 48:19 - 48:22
    darn good growth overall. And we like it
  • 48:22 - 48:25
    so we look at where we are in terms of
  • 48:25 - 48:28
    having created all of those jobs, right.
  • 48:28 - 48:30
    Here's our last peak. There it is, in May
  • 48:30 - 48:33
    of 2007 when we had about let's call it
  • 48:33 - 48:34
    nine hundred and forty thousand today
  • 48:34 - 48:36
    where, let's call it nine hundred and
  • 48:36 - 48:39
    eighty thousand. We have forty thousand
  • 48:39 - 48:42
    more jobs today in our community than we
  • 48:42 - 48:44
    did then on the far right hand side of
  • 48:44 - 48:47
    my chart, of course, is what sectors are
  • 48:47 - 48:48
    showing the greatest growth. And I think
  • 48:48 - 48:50
    this is part of the angst that we have.
  • 48:50 - 48:53
    The number one growth sector we had over
  • 48:53 - 48:55
    the past 12 months has been construction.
  • 48:55 - 48:57
    We added 8,500 jobs, and I am here to
  • 48:57 - 48:59
    tell you that as we're going through
  • 48:59 - 49:01
    this exercise. By the time we get to the
  • 49:01 - 49:03
    end of this year, our community is going
  • 49:03 - 49:06
    to be 10,000 construction workers short
  • 49:06 - 49:08
    of the number. We're going to need to
  • 49:08 - 49:10
    keep pace with all the projects we have.
  • 49:10 - 49:11
    And if there's some construction folks
  • 49:11 - 49:13
    in the room, they're probably going to
  • 49:13 - 49:15
    tell you that I'm light on that number,
  • 49:15 - 49:16
    and we're all
  • 49:16 - 49:18
    10,000 construction workers short of
  • 49:18 - 49:20
    hitting that number. Look at the other
  • 49:20 - 49:21
    areas that we're growing professional
  • 49:21 - 49:23
    and business services, leisure and
  • 49:23 - 49:26
    hospitality, education, in health care, all
  • 49:26 - 49:28
    expanding. Let's take a look at the
  • 49:28 - 49:30
    unemployment rate, right? Our unemployment
  • 49:30 - 49:32
    rate, of course, was always approaching
  • 49:32 - 49:36
    15% at the peak of the market. The green
  • 49:36 - 49:37
    area at the bottom shows the
  • 49:37 - 49:39
    differential between our unemployment
  • 49:39 - 49:41
    rate and the United States unemployment
  • 49:41 - 49:43
    rate, which I will argue would be almost
  • 49:43 - 49:45
    more important than anything else that's
  • 49:45 - 49:48
    on this chart. Why? Because that led to an
  • 49:48 - 49:50
    out migration of folks, and was part of
  • 49:50 - 49:52
    the reason that we lost 1 out of every 8
  • 49:52 - 49:55
    private sector jobs in its southern
  • 49:55 - 49:57
    nevada during the peak of the recession.
  • 49:57 - 50:00
    Today, we've gotten almost all of it back
  • 50:00 - 50:04
    we are doing well we are at near full
  • 50:04 - 50:06
    employment, if not at full employment and
  • 50:06 - 50:09
    that is extremely positive overall under
  • 50:09 - 50:11
    where we were where we're headed.
  • 50:11 - 50:12
    All those types of things. Now, I
  • 50:12 - 50:15
    understand that this chart is is there's
  • 50:15 - 50:17
    a lot of colors and a lot of numbers, all
  • 50:17 - 50:19
    type of things. I'd like to talk about it
  • 50:19 - 50:22
    just for a moment that those sort of big
  • 50:22 - 50:23
    green blocks. That's leisure and
  • 50:23 - 50:25
    hospitality right? This shows us how many
  • 50:25 - 50:28
    employees we have, and every sector of
  • 50:28 - 50:30
    the economy, you can see the big green
  • 50:30 - 50:34
    block is still the big green block. You
  • 50:34 - 50:36
    will also see that if we look at 2007
  • 50:36 - 50:39
    versus 2017 that the yellow area which
  • 50:39 - 50:41
    is education and health services, which
  • 50:41 - 50:43
    of course, you just heard a great deal
  • 50:43 - 50:46
    about is getting larger we still have
  • 50:46 - 50:48
    only 70 percent of the healthcare
  • 50:48 - 50:50
    economy we should for an area of our
  • 50:50 - 50:52
    size and that is hugely problematic.
  • 50:52 - 50:54
    Although, you will notice that the yellow
  • 50:54 - 50:58
    area has gotten increasingly bigger. I'm
  • 50:58 - 51:01
    really glad that Shelley clarified in
  • 51:01 - 51:02
    terms of what nephrology is because
  • 51:02 - 51:03
    there's been growth there. And I was
  • 51:03 - 51:05
    really wondering, "What the hell was going
  • 51:05 - 51:10
    on," right? So I'm glad I now have all of
  • 51:10 - 51:12
    that straight. But at the end of the day
  • 51:12 - 51:14
    is the one that we probably care about.
  • 51:14 - 51:15
    The most is this one which is why we
  • 51:15 - 51:17
    created the chart in the first place, and
  • 51:17 - 51:19
    that's the idea of construction. So if
  • 51:19 - 51:21
    construction is now at the top of our
  • 51:21 - 51:24
    list, are we getting out over our skis? Do
  • 51:24 - 51:28
    we have this huge problem? In 2007, you
  • 51:28 - 51:29
    can see that 11.2%
  • 51:29 - 51:31
    of our employment was in construction at
  • 51:31 - 51:34
    the bottom of the market it was 4.8%.
  • 51:34 - 51:36
    Today, we're 6.3 and on the right-hand
  • 51:36 - 51:38
    side of my chart. I think it's what is
  • 51:38 - 51:40
    critically important. I just told you we
  • 51:40 - 51:44
    have 40,000 more employees than we did
  • 51:44 - 51:48
    at the prior peak of our economy, we did
  • 51:48 - 51:51
    that with 40 thousand fewer construction
  • 51:51 - 51:54
    workers in our economy at its peak. That
  • 51:54 - 51:55
    was a hundred and five thousand today.
  • 51:55 - 51:58
    It's 61 thousand, not a bad place for us
  • 51:58 - 52:00
    to be. And I would argue significantly
  • 52:00 - 52:02
    more healthy than where we were going in
  • 52:02 - 52:05
    to the economic downturn, now. Let's
  • 52:05 - 52:07
    take a look at what the U.S. averages
  • 52:07 - 52:09
    are for each one of those five point six
  • 52:09 - 52:11
    percent, three point nine percent and
  • 52:11 - 52:13
    four point six percent. Okay, we'll take
  • 52:13 - 52:16
    it that number starts that six point
  • 52:16 - 52:17
    three percent on that one. On the right
  • 52:17 - 52:20
    starts to approach 8 percent, we need to
  • 52:20 - 52:22
    start having a conversation about it. In
  • 52:22 - 52:23
    our community, that is the level of
  • 52:23 - 52:25
    growth that will start to be
  • 52:25 - 52:26
    unsustainable and something we'll need
  • 52:26 - 52:29
    to keep an eye on. If we look at it in
  • 52:29 - 52:32
    terms of the demand for space, right, is
  • 52:32 - 52:34
    this creation of jobs and what we're
  • 52:34 - 52:36
    developing leading to this demand for
  • 52:36 - 52:38
    space. This chart has all kinds of
  • 52:38 - 52:39
    information on it the vacancy rate and
  • 52:39 - 52:42
    how many employees are office using and
  • 52:42 - 52:44
    how many square feet they use and all
  • 52:44 - 52:45
    those types of things, all of which is
  • 52:45 - 52:46
    important and I appreciate my guys
  • 52:46 - 52:48
    putting it on here. But what is
  • 52:48 - 52:50
    critically important about this slide is
  • 52:50 - 52:53
    that the little green line is above the
  • 52:53 - 52:54
    little purple line, which means that we
  • 52:54 - 52:57
    are demanding more office space than we
  • 52:57 - 52:59
    are bringing on concurrent with this
  • 52:59 - 53:01
    fact that we are growing more rapidly. We
  • 53:01 - 53:04
    are also finding ways to utilize the
  • 53:04 - 53:06
    existing space that we have and we are
  • 53:06 - 53:08
    being pragmatic in terms of how much
  • 53:08 - 53:11
    we're bringing on. This chart shows the
  • 53:11 - 53:13
    number of the amount of occupied space
  • 53:13 - 53:16
    for every office using employee at the
  • 53:16 - 53:18
    peak of the market sort of, back sort of
  • 53:18 - 53:20
    looking far to the right and then we go
  • 53:20 - 53:22
    up into the recession and that number
  • 53:22 - 53:25
    gets to 130 square feet for every office
  • 53:25 - 53:28
    using employee. Why does it get to that
  • 53:28 - 53:30
    level? Because when you start laying
  • 53:30 - 53:32
    people off, you've got a lot of office
  • 53:32 - 53:34
    space out there, right? And so if we look
  • 53:34 - 53:37
    today, we're now at about 110, which means
  • 53:37 - 53:40
    we are utilizing our office space in a
  • 53:40 - 53:42
    way that's almost equally effective to a
  • 53:42 - 53:43
    period when the
  • 53:43 - 53:45
    vacancy rate was, you know, let's call it
  • 53:45 - 53:49
    sub 6% in our community. What we have is
  • 53:49 - 53:51
    a disconnect between functional space
  • 53:51 - 53:53
    and well located space and non
  • 53:53 - 53:55
    functional space and stuff that's just
  • 53:55 - 53:56
    not that well located. And that's what
  • 53:56 - 53:58
    we're seeing today. And so what's working
  • 53:58 - 54:01
    out okay, and in addition to that, what we
  • 54:01 - 54:03
    are building in our community. Our
  • 54:03 - 54:05
    corporate headquarters build two suits,
  • 54:05 - 54:07
    right, some of the most phenomenal office
  • 54:07 - 54:09
    developments in the entire western
  • 54:09 - 54:11
    United States are happening right, in our
  • 54:11 - 54:12
    backyard. Not the least of which is
  • 54:12 - 54:15
    something the UFC and aristocrat
  • 54:15 - 54:17
    facilities that are recently constructed.
  • 54:17 - 54:19
    Now, the housing market seems to me to be
  • 54:19 - 54:21
    something that's worthy of some extended
  • 54:21 - 54:24
    discussion along the same lines.
  • 54:24 - 54:26
    Why? Because housing was given all of the
  • 54:26 - 54:28
    blame in terms of the economic downturn,
  • 54:28 - 54:30
    and seems to be getting zero of the
  • 54:30 - 54:32
    credit in terms of coming back. We've
  • 54:32 - 54:35
    seen subdivisions have started to pop up
  • 54:35 - 54:36
    and those types of things, which is
  • 54:36 - 54:39
    creating some concern in terms of over
  • 54:39 - 54:41
    building, within our market or price is
  • 54:41 - 54:43
    getting out of line. Are we building too
  • 54:43 - 54:45
    many houses? Should I buy a house? Is my
  • 54:45 - 54:47
    house going to drop in value as a result?
  • 54:47 - 54:49
    I hear this question at least three
  • 54:49 - 54:52
    times a week. And so, let me try and
  • 54:52 - 54:54
    answer at the 500 people at one time on.
  • 54:54 - 54:57
    The critical way of looking at it is
  • 54:57 - 54:59
    something we refer to as the ep ratio or
  • 54:59 - 55:02
    the number of employees versus the
  • 55:02 - 55:03
    number of permits that you're
  • 55:03 - 55:04
    constructing. And forgive me for getting
  • 55:04 - 55:07
    overly technical, but there are generally
  • 55:07 - 55:11
    about 1.35 employees in every household.
  • 55:11 - 55:14
    It's just the way it averages out and so
  • 55:14 - 55:16
    if that number gets out of whack if you
  • 55:16 - 55:18
    start to permit more than that it
  • 55:18 - 55:19
    becomes problematic. If you permit less
  • 55:19 - 55:21
    than that, it becomes problematic from an
  • 55:21 - 55:24
    over/under supply standpoint. Today, the
  • 55:24 - 55:27
    little purple line is what Las Vegas is
  • 55:27 - 55:29
    doing in terms of the EP ratio which
  • 55:29 - 55:31
    means that there are two point four
  • 55:31 - 55:33
    employees for every home that we are
  • 55:33 - 55:36
    constructing today. With everything that
  • 55:36 - 55:38
    we're seeing, we're not building enough
  • 55:38 - 55:41
    homes for all of the employees that we
  • 55:41 - 55:43
    are generating. And the matter of fact, if
  • 55:43 - 55:45
    we look at the Green Line, which
  • 55:45 - 55:46
    represents the United States as a whole
  • 55:46 - 55:50
    the U.S. is building about 1.7 for 1.75
  • 55:50 - 55:53
    houses for, excuse me, employees generate
  • 55:53 - 55:56
    one additional housing unit. We are under
  • 55:56 - 55:59
    building our residential today which
  • 55:59 - 56:01
    leaves us with some degree of comfort
  • 56:01 - 56:03
    overall in terms of housing
  • 56:03 - 56:04
    affordability. Is it getting out of whack?
  • 56:04 - 56:07
    The answers really no. You can see places
  • 56:07 - 56:09
    like the bigger numbers are actually
  • 56:09 - 56:11
    better here, so don't we, excuse me. Don't
  • 56:11 - 56:14
    read this in any way incorrectly. UC San
  • 56:14 - 56:16
    Francisco Los Angeles and San Jose or at
  • 56:16 - 56:18
    the bottom in terms of housing
  • 56:18 - 56:19
    opportunity can people actually afford a
  • 56:19 - 56:21
    house? No they cannot. In those markets,
  • 56:21 - 56:23
    can they in our market? Yes they can. If
  • 56:23 - 56:25
    we look at the housing price index,
  • 56:25 - 56:27
    we're not even back to where we were
  • 56:27 - 56:31
    overall. Now, if we think about it in
  • 56:31 - 56:32
    terms of this coming full circle, let's
  • 56:32 - 56:34
    make sure that we are clear here, in
  • 56:34 - 56:37
    terms of how it all played out. This is
  • 56:37 - 56:38
    2004,
  • 56:38 - 56:41
    excuse me 2003 to 2004, arguably the peak
  • 56:41 - 56:43
    of the housing market the prior peak of
  • 56:43 - 56:45
    the housing market Nevada was number one
  • 56:45 - 56:47
    in the United States, with annual
  • 56:47 - 56:51
    appreciation of 37.2%. If anyone believes
  • 56:51 - 56:54
    that appreciation of 37.2%
  • 56:54 - 56:56
    is in any way sustainable, we can have a
  • 56:56 - 56:59
    conversation after this meeting. Okay,
  • 56:59 - 57:02
    it's just not right so now let's
  • 57:02 - 57:03
    fast-forward to the bottom of the market.
  • 57:03 - 57:06
    We go from number one in the United
  • 57:06 - 57:08
    States. We go all the way down to number
  • 57:08 - 57:10
    50 in the United States. We drop by
  • 57:10 - 57:12
    twenty five point, seven percent. Of
  • 57:12 - 57:14
    course, that's dramatic. Everyone's
  • 57:14 - 57:17
    concerned? So where are we today? The most
  • 57:17 - 57:19
    recent numbers place us in the top five.
  • 57:19 - 57:21
    Yes, I would prefer to be in the top 10
  • 57:21 - 57:24
    in the top five, but that number is 8
  • 57:24 - 57:27
    percent right? Much more sustainable than
  • 57:27 - 57:29
    something that's measured with a, you
  • 57:29 - 57:32
    know, then thirty eight percent or twenty
  • 57:32 - 57:34
    eight percent or even 18 percent. We'll
  • 57:34 - 57:36
    take it right. We understand where it is,
  • 57:36 - 57:38
    and it's certainly not as nearly as out
  • 57:38 - 57:41
    of whack as some have suggested. Now
  • 57:41 - 57:43
    arguably most important here is this
  • 57:43 - 57:45
    idea that people see building permits
  • 57:45 - 57:47
    are going up, and they're rising by
  • 57:47 - 57:49
    double-digit rates. And we're seeing all
  • 57:49 - 57:51
    these subdivision comes out, and we're
  • 57:51 - 57:52
    hearing about all of these new
  • 57:52 - 57:54
    communities that are out here. These are
  • 57:54 - 57:58
    new home market closings? Right,
  • 57:58 - 58:00
    how many housing units we are building
  • 58:00 - 58:03
    and are being sold in the market on the
  • 58:03 - 58:06
    left-hand side of the chart is what it
  • 58:06 - 58:08
    looked like when we were going up, right?
  • 58:08 - 58:09
    Over
  • 58:09 - 58:11
    40,000 housing units were being
  • 58:11 - 58:14
    constructed the past 12 months. That
  • 58:14 - 58:17
    number is 8300 in our community today.
  • 58:17 - 58:20
    Again, the idea that we are getting out
  • 58:20 - 58:22
    over our skis that it's becoming
  • 58:22 - 58:25
    increasingly problematic. Yes, we have
  • 58:25 - 58:27
    things to be concerned about, but I think
  • 58:27 - 58:28
    we should take a deep breath, and not be
  • 58:28 - 58:31
    scared by our prosperity again.
  • 58:31 - 58:33
    We will be defined by our ability to
  • 58:33 - 58:37
    sustain that prosperity over time on the
  • 58:37 - 58:38
    far right hand side of my chart is the
  • 58:38 - 58:41
    median price for newly constructed homes.
  • 58:41 - 58:43
    You can see that we're almost back to
  • 58:43 - 58:44
    peak. Of course, you also have 10 years
  • 58:44 - 58:46
    worth of inflation in there. And the
  • 58:46 - 58:48
    reality is that home builders are just
  • 58:48 - 58:50
    simply building bigger homes today than
  • 58:50 - 58:53
    they did a decade ago. So again, we're not
  • 58:53 - 58:55
    even very concerned about that number
  • 58:55 - 58:57
    and for most of us sitting in the room.
  • 58:57 - 58:59
    We're much more concerned about existing
  • 58:59 - 59:00
    homes than we are new construction
  • 59:00 - 59:02
    because that affects each one of us or
  • 59:02 - 59:04
    many of us. I'm sure if you look at the
  • 59:04 - 59:06
    number on the right, excuse me. The
  • 59:06 - 59:07
    numbers on the left that reflects how
  • 59:07 - 59:09
    many closings are out there. Very
  • 59:09 - 59:11
    consistent with what we'd expect. And on
  • 59:11 - 59:13
    the right hand side is what we call the
  • 59:13 - 59:16
    rollercoaster of doom, ok. And what the
  • 59:16 - 59:18
    rollercoaster of doom means is that if
  • 59:18 - 59:20
    you look on the far left-hand side of
  • 59:20 - 59:22
    that chart, this is what median closing
  • 59:22 - 59:24
    prices were all the way back in 03.
  • 59:24 - 59:27
    And if your little red line represents a
  • 59:27 - 59:29
    three percent growth rate, which is
  • 59:29 - 59:31
    pretty much exactly our housing prices
  • 59:31 - 59:34
    have appreciated over time for the past
  • 59:34 - 59:37
    50 years. Now, we have a period with a
  • 59:37 - 59:39
    huge boom. We have a spirit with a huge
  • 59:39 - 59:41
    bust. You wipe all of that out over about
  • 59:41 - 59:43
    a 12 year period, 13 year period.
  • 59:43 - 59:46
    And what happens? We're exactly back to
  • 59:46 - 59:48
    the three percent growth rate that we
  • 59:48 - 59:50
    should have been at the outset. It's just
  • 59:50 - 59:52
    markets doing what they do, and if we
  • 59:52 - 59:54
    look at new homes as a percentage of
  • 59:54 - 59:57
    existing homes. Are we getting out over
  • 59:57 - 59:59
    our skis in terms of the amount of
  • 59:59 - 60:01
    construction versus existing inventory?
  • 60:01 - 60:04
    It is 14 and a half percent nowhere near
  • 60:04 - 60:05
    what it was at the peak of the market
  • 60:05 - 60:08
    when it approached 60% of existing
  • 60:08 - 60:12
    inventory land. Land availability becomes
  • 60:12 - 60:13
    this big concern I've heard rumblings
  • 60:13 - 60:15
    about the fact that we have to go to the
  • 60:15 - 60:17
    federal government and get them to
  • 60:17 - 60:21
    release more land to drive down prices
  • 60:21 - 60:23
    because those prices are coming up this
  • 60:23 - 60:25
    the price of land that you see here. We
  • 60:25 - 60:27
    have excluded residential, excuse me,
  • 60:27 - 60:29
    resort casino development that's in
  • 60:29 - 60:31
    there. So you get the idea you see that
  • 60:31 - 60:34
    in 2007, the average price of land was
  • 60:34 - 60:36
    $800,000 a day. We all remember the land
  • 60:36 - 60:38
    auctions and the like and now I'm going
  • 60:38 - 60:40
    to lay over the top of that median new
  • 60:40 - 60:42
    home price and median existing home
  • 60:42 - 60:45
    price. We'll look at the expansion. We'll
  • 60:45 - 60:46
    look at the peak. We'll look at the
  • 60:46 - 60:48
    contraction. We'll look at the trough. And
  • 60:48 - 60:52
    where we are today, that is with a very
  • 60:52 - 60:54
    normal cycle and that frankly on the
  • 60:54 - 60:57
    right hand side of my chart the distance
  • 60:57 - 60:59
    between the price of land and the price
  • 60:59 - 61:01
    of housing is where we would like it to
  • 61:01 - 61:03
    be on this chart. Now, I'm not going to
  • 61:03 - 61:05
    say that I'm not somewhat concerned
  • 61:05 - 61:06
    about the fact that land prices are
  • 61:06 - 61:09
    escalating. But nonetheless, you get the
  • 61:09 - 61:12
    idea of where we are versus where we
  • 61:12 - 61:14
    were when things were overheated now if
  • 61:14 - 61:16
    we start to see a trend that looks like
  • 61:16 - 61:18
    what we saw in five six and seven. It's
  • 61:18 - 61:20
    time to bring the fire trucks up to the
  • 61:20 - 61:20
    front.
  • 61:20 - 61:24
    We cannot fear our prosperity as a
  • 61:24 - 61:27
    community. There are today seventy one
  • 61:27 - 61:29
    thousand five hundred developable acres
  • 61:29 - 61:32
    in Southern Nevada. We're developing
  • 61:32 - 61:34
    about five thousand of those every year.
  • 61:34 - 61:36
    That's what these charts show. And so, we
  • 61:36 - 61:38
    have about fourteen years worth of
  • 61:38 - 61:41
    affected inventory left. If we average
  • 61:41 - 61:43
    everything out, not bad and where we want
  • 61:43 - 61:46
    to be if we look at this idea. Well, we
  • 61:46 - 61:49
    hear all the time that incomes are not
  • 61:49 - 61:51
    keeping pace that housing prices are
  • 61:51 - 61:52
    going up, but all of our incomes are
  • 61:52 - 61:55
    remaining. They're remaining flat. I read
  • 61:55 - 61:57
    yesterday that incomes haven't gone up
  • 61:57 - 61:59
    since 2000 or something, along those
  • 61:59 - 62:01
    lines number one. That's not right. Number
  • 62:01 - 62:02
    two. Let's just take a look at it.
  • 62:02 - 62:04
    Here's household income versus home
  • 62:04 - 62:08
    price. This is what it was prior to 2004,
  • 62:08 - 62:11
    this is when incomes outstripped housing
  • 62:11 - 62:13
    prices. Of course, this is during the boom
  • 62:13 - 62:15
    period since when home prices
  • 62:15 - 62:17
    outstripped incomes, when the world is
  • 62:17 - 62:19
    coming apart. And here's where we are
  • 62:19 - 62:22
    today. That Green Zone is what we would
  • 62:22 - 62:24
    refer to as the safe zone, and you will
  • 62:24 - 62:26
    also notice that those numbers are going
  • 62:26 - 62:28
    down, not going up which is something
  • 62:28 - 62:31
    that you know we, we certainly want to
  • 62:31 - 62:33
    keep an eye on. But we're not outside of
  • 62:33 - 62:36
    where we should be the number of homes
  • 62:36 - 62:36
    available.
  • 62:36 - 62:40
    For sale is 1.64 in terms of available
  • 62:40 - 62:42
    inventory, I bifurcated that into the two
  • 62:42 - 62:45
    component parts: lower priced homes under
  • 62:45 - 62:48
    300,000 on the right hand side. On higher
  • 62:48 - 62:50
    priced homes are on the, excuse me, above
  • 62:50 - 62:53
    higher priced homes are beneath there.
  • 62:53 - 62:54
    And you can see that there are greater
  • 62:54 - 62:56
    inventory of higher priced homes.
  • 62:56 - 62:59
    Shockingly, there are fewer buyers for
  • 62:59 - 63:01
    million-dollar homes, and therefore the
  • 63:01 - 63:02
    inventory tends to stay a little higher.
  • 63:04 - 63:07
    Right now, the homeowner equity, right?
  • 63:07 - 63:09
    here's where we were in two thousand
  • 63:09 - 63:13
    nine ten eleven twelve right? And just to
  • 63:13 - 63:15
    be clear, we want positive. We don't want
  • 63:15 - 63:17
    negative, the green can get as big as it
  • 63:17 - 63:19
    wants to get, right? Here we are in
  • 63:19 - 63:21
    thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, and sixteen
  • 63:21 - 63:24
    again. We've made huge strides in terms
  • 63:24 - 63:27
    of reversing this trend. This is the mix
  • 63:27 - 63:29
    of property sold. Green is good.
  • 63:29 - 63:32
    Everything else really bad. We want green
  • 63:32 - 63:34
    to be big. We want everything else to be
  • 63:34 - 63:37
    small. You can see where we are. If we
  • 63:37 - 63:38
    look at it instead of looking at some of
  • 63:38 - 63:40
    these markets, and we start going to the
  • 63:40 - 63:44
    basics. What are consumers doing overall?
  • 63:44 - 63:46
    This is Clark County's taxable retail
  • 63:46 - 63:49
    sales. Overall, right? And we are four
  • 63:49 - 63:51
    billion dollars. That's four billion
  • 63:51 - 63:53
    dollars among the higher than we have
  • 63:53 - 63:54
    ever been before.
  • 63:54 - 63:57
    Eating and drinking places. Auto Sales
  • 63:57 - 63:59
    general merchandise are all up, clothing
  • 63:59 - 64:01
    and accessories, are dropping not because
  • 64:01 - 64:03
    people aren't buying them. I assure you
  • 64:03 - 64:05
    they are my wife and daughter
  • 64:05 - 64:06
    single-handedly trying to keep the
  • 64:06 - 64:08
    economy afloat, right?
  • 64:08 - 64:11
    They're just doing it online. Okay, we get
  • 64:11 - 64:13
    it autos are slowing a little bit.
  • 64:13 - 64:15
    Nationally thumb here. That's to be
  • 64:15 - 64:18
    expected after seven record years. That's
  • 64:18 - 64:20
    okay. So we should be doing, but if we're
  • 64:20 - 64:21
    going to look at it in terms of this
  • 64:21 - 64:24
    full circle concept where are we
  • 64:24 - 64:27
    relative. This. This is inflation adjusted
  • 64:27 - 64:30
    per capita taxable spending so we're we
  • 64:30 - 64:32
    getting out ahead of ourselves or not. So,
  • 64:32 - 64:34
    let's just draw the average over the
  • 64:34 - 64:37
    30-year period. We remain below the
  • 64:37 - 64:39
    average today which means that spending
  • 64:39 - 64:41
    could escalate some, and we would still
  • 64:41 - 64:44
    be in the healthy zone that area with
  • 64:44 - 64:47
    the peaks up there. 04, 05, and 06. Or
  • 64:47 - 64:49
    we get anywhere near that it's time to
  • 64:49 - 64:50
    have
  • 64:50 - 64:52
    conversation overall. And we know that
  • 64:52 - 64:55
    taxable retail sales are changing. We get
  • 64:55 - 64:58
    it. The red area is non store retailers.
  • 64:58 - 65:00
    You will refer to them as places like
  • 65:00 - 65:02
    Amazon and things like that right? You
  • 65:02 - 65:05
    get this idea they're growing. These
  • 65:05 - 65:06
    other ones, they're not growing quite as
  • 65:06 - 65:09
    quickly okay. That's just things are
  • 65:09 - 65:11
    changing, and we know that we're sort of
  • 65:11 - 65:13
    trading this bricks and mortar retail
  • 65:13 - 65:16
    for more distribution space. So let's
  • 65:16 - 65:18
    take a look at whether our economy is
  • 65:18 - 65:21
    adapting to this new reality. On the
  • 65:21 - 65:22
    left-hand side is retail. On the
  • 65:22 - 65:25
    right-hand side is industrial. Yes. The
  • 65:25 - 65:27
    retail rate is elevated, but dropping the
  • 65:27 - 65:30
    industrial area where retailers are now
  • 65:30 - 65:32
    actually doing their retailing.
  • 65:32 - 65:34
    Essentially, fulfillment centers. If you
  • 65:34 - 65:37
    will are down to six point nine percent
  • 65:37 - 65:40
    overall. If we look at completions versus
  • 65:40 - 65:43
    absorption, the green line and the purple
  • 65:43 - 65:45
    line aligned with one another like we
  • 65:45 - 65:47
    talked about with the office market. Yes
  • 65:47 - 65:50
    they are. If we look at planned and under
  • 65:50 - 65:52
    construction. No, we're not building
  • 65:52 - 65:55
    retail because we shouldn't, right? And on
  • 65:55 - 65:56
    the other side, we're building industrial
  • 65:56 - 65:59
    because that's where everybody is going.
  • 65:59 - 66:02
    And yes, it is at peak levels. Currently,
  • 66:02 - 66:04
    under construction space is sourced 100%
  • 66:04 - 66:07
    to distribution centers, exactly how it
  • 66:07 - 66:10
    should be overall. And if we're asking
  • 66:10 - 66:12
    the question about whether we're getting
  • 66:12 - 66:14
    out over our skis whether we're building
  • 66:14 - 66:17
    too much, let's look at whether the
  • 66:17 - 66:19
    future development as a share of planned
  • 66:19 - 66:22
    inventory for retail. In the peak period,
  • 66:22 - 66:24
    we were we essentially had under
  • 66:24 - 66:26
    construction, 36 percent of our market.
  • 66:26 - 66:30
    Today, at 7.3, for industrial, we had 14
  • 66:30 - 66:33
    percent. Today, we're at 11 again. Well,
  • 66:33 - 66:35
    within the range of normalcy, we look at
  • 66:35 - 66:37
    large store closings and this makes us
  • 66:37 - 66:40
    nervous. And we tend to ignore that the
  • 66:40 - 66:42
    guys on the right are building on
  • 66:42 - 66:44
    occupying or occupying. And maybe not
  • 66:44 - 66:47
    building 2 million square feet in the
  • 66:47 - 66:50
    last year alone. This is simply a
  • 66:50 - 66:52
    transitional step relative to our
  • 66:52 - 66:53
    economy overall.
  • 66:53 - 66:56
    Now, wrap all that up, the big green
  • 66:56 - 66:58
    area that I showed you on my chart has
  • 66:58 - 67:00
    to do with tourism and tourism related
  • 67:00 - 67:02
    activity. Our growth and visitor
  • 67:02 - 67:04
    volume is significant, and it continues
  • 67:04 - 67:06
    to be incredibly important to us in. I'd
  • 67:06 - 67:10
    like talking about that is critical. One
  • 67:10 - 67:12
    in six people, one in six people that
  • 67:12 - 67:14
    puts a head in a bed. On any given night
  • 67:14 - 67:17
    is not a resident of Southern Nevada,
  • 67:17 - 67:19
    that's how big our visitor economy is.
  • 67:19 - 67:21
    And that is bigger than almost anywhere
  • 67:21 - 67:23
    else in the entire United States. Where
  • 67:23 - 67:25
    are they coming from? Western United
  • 67:25 - 67:27
    States. We want to get that international
  • 67:27 - 67:29
    all the way up to thirty. We're working
  • 67:29 - 67:31
    on it, but we're setting records relative
  • 67:31 - 67:33
    to visitation overall. And in particular,
  • 67:33 - 67:36
    convention visitors who spend more
  • 67:36 - 67:38
    generate more stay longer all those
  • 67:38 - 67:39
    things than their traditional. These
  • 67:39 - 67:41
    leisure counterparts, McCarran
  • 67:41 - 67:43
    International Airport, is today the
  • 67:43 - 67:45
    eighth busiest airport in the entire
  • 67:45 - 67:47
    United States. It's the second largest
  • 67:47 - 67:49
    destination and origination. I should say
  • 67:49 - 67:51
    that differently origination and
  • 67:51 - 67:53
    destination Airport in the United States.
  • 67:53 - 67:55
    Someone is going to have to explain to
  • 67:55 - 67:58
    me why we care about someone flying into
  • 67:58 - 68:00
    an airport staying on a plane and flying
  • 68:00 - 68:03
    somewhere else, right? Makes no sense to
  • 68:03 - 68:05
    me whatsoever, but we count it anyway.
  • 68:05 - 68:07
    This is when we take all of that out.
  • 68:07 - 68:09
    We'll take the people that stay someone
  • 68:09 - 68:11
    else because Atlanta can have all the
  • 68:11 - 68:12
    people who just want to go through
  • 68:12 - 68:16
    whatever, right/ The, LDCVA is absolutely
  • 68:16 - 68:19
    should be commended for being able to
  • 68:19 - 68:22
    expand our international reach with all
  • 68:22 - 68:24
    of these new flights, including one to
  • 68:24 - 68:26
    Beijing, China, which would be critically
  • 68:26 - 68:28
    important overall. And again, thinking
  • 68:28 - 68:30
    about it in terms of coming full circle.
  • 68:30 - 68:32
    On the left-hand side of my chart is the
  • 68:32 - 68:35
    occupancy rate. On the right hand side is
  • 68:35 - 68:37
    the average daily room rate, these are
  • 68:37 - 68:39
    the two factors that will become they
  • 68:39 - 68:41
    will become critical in determining
  • 68:41 - 68:44
    whether we make reinvestment. Here we are,
  • 68:44 - 68:46
    approaching 90 percent. Not quite where
  • 68:46 - 68:48
    we were, but approaching 90 percent. And
  • 68:48 - 68:51
    on the right hand side, ADR is 128
  • 68:51 - 68:53
    dollars per night. Almost back to the
  • 68:53 - 68:55
    peak, but something we didn't have. In
  • 68:55 - 68:59
    2007 and 2008, is the resort fee, which is
  • 68:59 - 69:02
    also added, on which means we are at peak
  • 69:02 - 69:05
    ADR. Today, all of that having been saidm
  • 69:05 - 69:06
    let's wrap it all up and put a bow on it
  • 69:06 - 69:08
    because everyone wants to focus. At least,
  • 69:08 - 69:10
    the national media does on this concept
  • 69:10 - 69:13
    that gaming revenue is below where it
  • 69:13 - 69:16
    should be or has not grown, ignoring
  • 69:16 - 69:18
    fact that Las Vegas trip total revenue
  • 69:18 - 69:21
    is up to 11.2 billion, not
  • 69:21 - 69:22
    only the highest level that it's ever
  • 69:22 - 69:25
    been, but blowing the previous piece out
  • 69:25 - 69:28
    of the water. If we look at the amount of
  • 69:28 - 69:30
    development and I will tell you: Jonas's
  • 69:30 - 69:33
    map is much more extensive than this and
  • 69:33 - 69:33
    you should really take a look at it
  • 69:33 - 69:35
    because I think it's super cool. But if
  • 69:35 - 69:37
    we look at it in terms of development,
  • 69:37 - 69:38
    That has recently happened on the Strip.
  • 69:38 - 69:40
    Whereas occurring their 7.8
  • 69:40 - 69:43
    billion dollars, and I've talked a
  • 69:43 - 69:44
    lot about the amount of development
  • 69:44 - 69:46
    that's happening in our community
  • 69:46 - 69:48
    because I think it's great, but if we're
  • 69:48 - 69:49
    going to ask the question is, "Are we
  • 69:49 - 69:52
    building too much?" Here's what those
  • 69:52 - 69:55
    numbers look like in 2007, when we had
  • 69:55 - 69:58
    45.8 billion dollars
  • 69:58 - 70:01
    worth of project on the books. Forty five
  • 70:01 - 70:02
    point eight billion. How much do we have
  • 70:02 - 70:03
    today?
  • 70:03 - 70:06
    14.1 billion dollars on the
  • 70:06 - 70:08
    books. There are communities all over the
  • 70:08 - 70:09
    United States that would give their
  • 70:09 - 70:11
    eyeteeth to have 14.1 billion
  • 70:11 - 70:13
    dollars worth of projects on the books.
  • 70:13 - 70:16
    But before we freaked out about the fact
  • 70:16 - 70:17
    that we're all building too much, and
  • 70:17 - 70:19
    there's not going to be enough glass and
  • 70:19 - 70:20
    not enough concrete. And we just can't
  • 70:20 - 70:22
    handle this much growth, I think we
  • 70:22 - 70:24
    should put it all in a little bit of
  • 70:24 - 70:27
    perspective. And what we are building is
  • 70:27 - 70:29
    based on bringing people here for
  • 70:29 - 70:31
    special events, stadiums, convention
  • 70:31 - 70:32
    centers, all those things because we have
  • 70:32 - 70:36
    assets that we can leverage 150,000
  • 70:36 - 70:38
    hotel rooms. The second busiest airport
  • 70:38 - 70:41
    in the United States restaurants, dining
  • 70:41 - 70:43
    all those types of things but Las Vegas
  • 70:43 - 70:45
    is just as important for those events as
  • 70:45 - 70:48
    as we are to them as they are to us. It's
  • 70:48 - 70:51
    a symbiotic relationship. I hear it all
  • 70:51 - 70:53
    the time, because of the work we do on
  • 70:53 - 70:55
    the stadium and other things on the
  • 70:55 - 70:56
    left-hand side. It's the pac-12
  • 70:56 - 70:58
    tournament. These are the attendance
  • 70:58 - 71:01
    numbers, when it was in Los Angeles. The
  • 71:01 - 71:02
    numbers on the right hand side are the
  • 71:02 - 71:04
    attendance numbers when it came to Las
  • 71:04 - 71:05
    Vegas. What about the Mountain West
  • 71:05 - 71:09
    tournament Las Vegas (MM03)? They
  • 71:09 - 71:11
    moved to Denver: surprise, surprise. They
  • 71:11 - 71:13
    move it back. This is why it works.
  • 71:13 - 71:15
    Terrence is telling me that I have to
  • 71:15 - 71:17
    wrap it up, so I'm going to go a little
  • 71:17 - 71:18
    bit quickly. And you, forgive me, he's
  • 71:18 - 71:21
    great, and I need to get it done. The
  • 71:21 - 71:24
    other side of this is that when we think
  • 71:24 - 71:26
    about it overall the economic
  • 71:26 - 71:28
    implications of those special events are
  • 71:28 - 71:29
    massive,
  • 71:29 - 71:34
    right? Super Bowl, Houston Texas, 138,000
  • 71:34 - 71:36
    Super Bowl visitors and 350 million
  • 71:36 - 71:38
    dollars of impact. That's why I was so
  • 71:38 - 71:40
    great to see the article in the
  • 71:40 - 71:41
    newspaper today, that they're talking
  • 71:41 - 71:43
    about potentially getting us a Super
  • 71:43 - 71:48
    Bowl in 2023 or 2024.
  • 71:48 - 71:50
    Hopefully, it happens. But we cannot
  • 71:50 - 71:52
    forget about the fact that while Houston
  • 71:52 - 71:54
    was hosting the Super Bowl with a
  • 71:54 - 71:55
    hundred and thirty eight thousand people.
  • 71:55 - 71:58
    We had three hundred thousand people
  • 71:58 - 72:00
    that showed up for Super Bowl weekend,
  • 72:00 - 72:05
    right, while we were here, almost on our
  • 72:05 - 72:08
    phone. Convention centers are phenomenal.
  • 72:08 - 72:10
    We have among the best in the entire
  • 72:10 - 72:12
    country. We have been atop the list for
  • 72:12 - 72:15
    the past 22 years and the business tax
  • 72:15 - 72:17
    climate has benefited from this amount.
  • 72:17 - 72:19
    We reach the tourists generate two
  • 72:19 - 72:22
    billion dollars in taxes for us every
  • 72:22 - 72:24
    single year. I'm not going to spend a
  • 72:24 - 72:26
    whole lot of time here. Other than saying
  • 72:26 - 72:28
    those are all of the states that have an
  • 72:28 - 72:30
    individual income tax, and we're not one
  • 72:30 - 72:32
    of them. Because 43 million people
  • 72:32 - 72:34
    decided to get in a car or get in a
  • 72:34 - 72:36
    plane, and come here and spend money. And
  • 72:36 - 72:38
    if you don't believe me, this is what
  • 72:38 - 72:40
    your sales tax raise, property tax rates,
  • 72:40 - 72:43
    and personal income tax rate would be if
  • 72:43 - 72:46
    they didn't exist today. We need to
  • 72:46 - 72:48
    preserve that sector of our economy at
  • 72:48 - 72:54
    all cost. Those are huge numbers. These
  • 72:54 - 72:56
    are the companies we're bringing in.
  • 72:56 - 72:58
    Northern Nevada is also getting them. We
  • 72:58 - 73:00
    are innovating over all these are
  • 73:00 - 73:02
    companies. We all know them. They're
  • 73:02 - 73:04
    making great steps, and great progress
  • 73:04 - 73:07
    but I do not want to minimize small
  • 73:07 - 73:10
    business development in our community. We
  • 73:10 - 73:12
    have more businesses here than we have
  • 73:12 - 73:14
    ever had before. We've created ninety two
  • 73:14 - 73:18
    hundred businesses since 2010. Thank you
  • 73:18 - 73:20
    to the LVGEA because they have been
  • 73:20 - 73:22
    critical, as well as each one of you in
  • 73:22 - 73:23
    making that happen.
  • 73:23 - 73:26
    Overall, my friends at Nevada state bank
  • 73:26 - 73:29
    asked for this idea of power small
  • 73:29 - 73:30
    business folks thinking about all of
  • 73:30 - 73:32
    this. We asked them, "Are you optimistic
  • 73:32 - 73:34
    about the economy?" They are more
  • 73:34 - 73:36
    optimistic than they have been at any
  • 73:36 - 73:39
    point in the past five years. Do you plan
  • 73:39 - 73:41
    to expand over the next 12 months? Do you
  • 73:41 - 73:42
    think things are going to get
  • 73:42 - 73:44
    over the 12, next 12 months? Yes, they do.
  • 73:44 - 73:48
    In closing, yes. Things are okay. We're
  • 73:48 - 73:51
    doing better where we're finding our
  • 73:51 - 73:53
    footing, but I'm always reminded of the
  • 73:53 - 73:55
    salient words, "Those who cannot remember
  • 73:55 - 73:58
    the past are condemned to repeat it." We
  • 73:58 - 74:01
    cannot ignore where we were when all of
  • 74:01 - 74:03
    development we couldn't handle. So we
  • 74:03 - 74:06
    were spilling over into Arizona, Las
  • 74:06 - 74:09
    Vegas, Waze billion-dollar reliever
  • 74:09 - 74:11
    Airport, right? We don't have enough room.
  • 74:11 - 74:14
    It can, so, we're going to build Ivanpah,
  • 74:14 - 74:16
    right? Least affordable real estate
  • 74:16 - 74:18
    market in the United States. These are
  • 74:18 - 74:20
    the type of articles that were coming
  • 74:20 - 74:24
    out when we were at our absolute peak. We
  • 74:24 - 74:27
    cannot let this happen again. Las Vegas
  • 74:27 - 74:29
    closing on another full house. I love
  • 74:29 - 74:30
    that they have to come up with some type
  • 74:30 - 74:32
    of gambling analogy, no matter what they
  • 74:32 - 74:33
    write anyway that's my own personal
  • 74:33 - 74:35
    problem. Condomania in the West, and as
  • 74:35 - 74:38
    we all remember the Manhattan-ization of
  • 74:38 - 74:41
    Las Vegas, right? This is a map. We
  • 74:41 - 74:42
    actually been doing this presentation
  • 74:42 - 74:45
    since 2007, this is my 10th year doing it.
  • 74:45 - 74:46
    I'm very thankful for that.
  • 74:46 - 74:48
    This is a map we used in the very first
  • 74:48 - 74:50
    one of all the plans proposed or under
  • 74:50 - 74:53
    construction condos that were in
  • 74:53 - 74:55
    Southern Nevada. Almost, none of them were
  • 74:55 - 74:57
    actually built right. This is where we
  • 74:57 - 74:59
    can't go because we've got to come full
  • 74:59 - 75:02
    circle. So let's just fix, let's talk just
  • 75:02 - 75:03
    for one minute, and I promise I'll get
  • 75:03 - 75:05
    down from where we are downtown
  • 75:05 - 75:07
    Summerlin stall. During the economic
  • 75:07 - 75:09
    downturn, this is what it looks like
  • 75:09 - 75:12
    today. We can be proud of that.
  • 75:12 - 75:13
    The folks at Summerlin should be
  • 75:13 - 75:18
    incredibly proud of that. Yeah. thank you.
  • 75:20 - 75:23
    Anyway, they know the statistics only. See
  • 75:23 - 75:25
    Manhattan West all during the economic
  • 75:25 - 75:26
    downturn. This is what it looks like
  • 75:26 - 75:29
    today. Here's the Kyle Canyon master plan.
  • 75:29 - 75:31
    1,700 acres was foreclosed on. Here's
  • 75:31 - 75:33
    what it looks like today the folks, the
  • 75:33 - 75:35
    city of Las Vegas. Think Stavros was here.
  • 75:35 - 75:37
    Congratulations on what you guys have
  • 75:37 - 75:39
    been able to do. A salon stall, during
  • 75:39 - 75:41
    economic downturn, recently announced
  • 75:41 - 75:42
    they're getting that project going
  • 75:42 - 75:43
    forward, and it'll be happening pretty
  • 75:43 - 75:46
    soon. Interstate 11, of course, has that
  • 75:46 - 75:49
    met any number of delays and now is
  • 75:49 - 75:51
    actually going to happen. City Center, if
  • 75:51 - 75:53
    anyone's ever heard Jim Murr and talked
  • 75:53 - 75:54
    about how close it was to closing down.
  • 75:54 - 75:56
    It didn't, and not only have they
  • 75:56 - 75:58
    finished that project that they double
  • 75:58 - 75:59
    down with building the T-Mobile Arena,
  • 75:59 - 76:01
    which will probably be among the most
  • 76:01 - 76:03
    productive arenas in the entire United
  • 76:03 - 76:05
    States when everything's added up for
  • 76:05 - 76:07
    its first year of operation. And the very
  • 76:07 - 76:10
    last one south strip right, this property
  • 76:10 - 76:13
    was foreclosed on 62 acres there off the
  • 76:13 - 76:15
    freeway. It's going to be the home of the
  • 76:15 - 76:17
    new Las Vegas Stadium. Thank you very
  • 76:17 - 76:19
    much.
  • 76:23 - 76:29
    Sigh landing was that powerful. Did you
  • 76:29 - 76:31
    enjoy that can we get another round of
  • 76:31 - 76:38
    applause? Awesome, awesome. For our next
  • 76:38 - 76:40
    segment, you guys are in for a treat. We
  • 76:40 - 76:43
    wanted to show you a look at the future
  • 76:43 - 76:48
    of gaming. We have the best expert in the
  • 76:48 - 76:49
    entire country to talk to you about that
  • 76:50 - 76:51
    particular project.
  • 76:51 - 76:53
    Jeff Freeman is the CEO of the American
  • 76:53 - 76:56
    Gaming Association. He is a global leader.
  • 76:56 - 76:58
    He is responsible for positioning
  • 76:58 - 77:01
    commercial and tribal gaming for success.
  • 77:01 - 77:03
    And he's also a powerhouse speaker.
  • 77:03 - 77:05
    Please help me welcome to the stage,
  • 77:05 - 77:16
    Jeff Freeman. So I'm thinking of starting
  • 77:16 - 77:18
    every speech with that sex with a dead
  • 77:18 - 77:23
    person joke, it's bound to get.
  • 77:23 - 77:25
    Congresswoman Buerkle had to leave, so
  • 77:25 - 77:26
    it's even better. I'd say, this in her
  • 77:26 - 77:28
    absence. I've been in Washington 20 years.
  • 77:28 - 77:31
    I've met with a lot of members of
  • 77:31 - 77:33
    Congress, I have never met someone who
  • 77:33 - 77:35
    was a greater champion for an industry,
  • 77:35 - 77:38
    for a city, for a state. Than
  • 77:38 - 77:40
    Congresswoman Buerkle was, she was a
  • 77:40 - 77:42
    tremendous champion for this area and
  • 77:42 - 77:43
    it's something for which all of you
  • 77:43 - 77:46
    should be quite proud. We have today,
  • 77:46 - 77:48
    great champions from Nevada, we
  • 77:48 - 77:50
    appreciate the support from Nevada, but
  • 77:50 - 77:52
    not for one second. Should we forget what
  • 77:52 - 77:53
    Congresswoman Buerkle did? It's also
  • 77:53 - 77:55
    great to follow Jeremy. What great energy,
  • 77:55 - 77:58
    What great enthusiasm and passion for
  • 77:58 - 78:00
    this area, and the message that I heard.
  • 78:00 - 78:03
    There was fantastic about embrace the
  • 78:03 - 78:05
    prosperity embrace, what this area, this
  • 78:05 - 78:08
    region, has accomplished figure out. How
  • 78:08 - 78:10
    we sustain that? Figure out how we
  • 78:10 - 78:12
    capitalize on it. You know that same
  • 78:12 - 78:14
    message actually applies to the gaming
  • 78:14 - 78:16
    industry, and I'm excited to talk a
  • 78:16 - 78:18
    little bit about that today. Before I get
  • 78:18 - 78:20
    started, I want to thank Jonas, I want to
  • 78:20 - 78:22
    thank the LVGEA. I really appreciate the
  • 78:22 - 78:23
    invitation here and what, congratulate
  • 78:23 - 78:25
    you for everything you've done in this
  • 78:25 - 78:27
    area, supporting the economy here in
  • 78:27 - 78:27
    Nevada.
  • 78:27 - 78:29
    I represent a national industry. I'm
  • 78:29 - 78:32
    based in Washington, a national
  • 78:32 - 78:34
    organization, but I believe everything
  • 78:34 - 78:35
    we're doing whether we're doing it in
  • 78:35 - 78:36
    Nevada.
  • 78:36 - 78:37
    New Jersey, where I'll be tonight in
  • 78:37 - 78:40
    Atlantic City or whether we're doing in
  • 78:40 - 78:41
    Missouri or any other state. That is
  • 78:41 - 78:44
    gaming. It all comes back to helping Las
  • 78:44 - 78:45
    Vegas. It all comes back to helping
  • 78:45 - 78:47
    Nevada, so let me talk a little bit about
  • 78:47 - 78:50
    who this industry is right now where
  • 78:50 - 78:52
    we're going, and the great opportunities
  • 78:52 - 78:54
    we have ahead because this is an
  • 78:54 - 78:56
    exciting time in the gaming industry, not
  • 78:56 - 78:57
    just because we've got great new
  • 78:57 - 78:58
    properties opening. We've got new markets
  • 78:58 - 79:02
    emerging, we've got a former casino owner
  • 79:02 - 79:06
    as president of the United States and,
  • 79:06 - 79:09
    whatever you might think of President
  • 79:09 - 79:14
    Trump for this industry that only says
  • 79:14 - 79:17
    opportunity, that only says we've got an
  • 79:17 - 79:19
    opportunity to do something great that
  • 79:19 - 79:22
    we haven't had before. So let's talk
  • 79:22 - 79:24
    about why we have that opportunity
  • 79:24 - 79:25
    because I think it's important that we
  • 79:25 - 79:27
    embrace that, and then let's talk about
  • 79:27 - 79:29
    how we capitalize on this industry today.
  • 79:29 - 79:31
    This industry that just started, right?
  • 79:31 - 79:35
    Here in Nevada is today a 240 billion
  • 79:35 - 79:38
    dollar industry across 40 states in the
  • 79:38 - 79:42
    US. 1.7 million jobs supported nearly 40
  • 79:42 - 79:45
    billion dollars in tax revenue. This
  • 79:45 - 79:49
    industry is a major economic force and
  • 79:49 - 79:52
    it's only growing in the latest year for
  • 79:52 - 79:54
    which we have data available. Commercial
  • 79:54 - 79:57
    gaming did 39 billion dollars in revenue.
  • 79:57 - 80:01
    Tribal gaming 30 billion dollars in
  • 80:01 - 80:03
    revenue, nearly seventy billion dollars
  • 80:03 - 80:05
    in revenue between these two
  • 80:05 - 80:08
    entities: commercial and tribal. This is a
  • 80:08 - 80:11
    massive economic force in communities
  • 80:11 - 80:13
    across the country and that economic
  • 80:13 - 80:16
    footprint now speaks to the increasing
  • 80:16 - 80:19
    mainstream nature of our industry, you
  • 80:19 - 80:20
    know when you look at the critics of
  • 80:20 - 80:22
    gaming. The critics of gaming only exist
  • 80:22 - 80:24
    in the communities in which we don't do
  • 80:24 - 80:27
    business, and the communities in which
  • 80:27 - 80:30
    casinos operate were strong community
  • 80:30 - 80:32
    partners, and we are incredible economic
  • 80:32 - 80:35
    generators. And that's a big part of the
  • 80:35 - 80:37
    opportunity we have ahead. The second
  • 80:37 - 80:39
    part of the opportunity we have ahead,
  • 80:39 - 80:42
    and more to that mainstream nature of
  • 80:42 - 80:44
    this industry, is the improving
  • 80:44 - 80:47
    perception of this industry as all of,
  • 80:47 - 80:49
    you know, this October. The Vegas golden
  • 80:49 - 80:50
    eye.
  • 80:50 - 80:52
    We'll kick off their inaugural season.
  • 80:52 - 80:55
    The Raiders will arrive in one, two, three
  • 80:55 - 80:57
    years of stadium. Not too far after that,
  • 80:57 - 81:00
    we had a presidential debate last year
  • 81:00 - 81:03
    here in Las Vegas, and as I said, we have
  • 81:03 - 81:05
    a president who's a former casino owner
  • 81:05 - 81:07
    and one of the most amazing aspects
  • 81:07 - 81:09
    about that. And there are a lot of
  • 81:09 - 81:11
    amazing aspects about that one of the
  • 81:11 - 81:13
    most amazing aspects about that the act
  • 81:13 - 81:16
    of owning casinos never came up during
  • 81:16 - 81:20
    the campaign. The act of managing and the
  • 81:20 - 81:21
    ability to manage it came up a couple
  • 81:21 - 81:23
    times, but the act of owning casinos
  • 81:23 - 81:26
    never came up. So just as Jeremy was
  • 81:26 - 81:28
    talking about the prosperity here, in
  • 81:28 - 81:30
    Las Vegas. And in this area, think about
  • 81:30 - 81:32
    the prosperity of 2016
  • 81:32 - 81:34
    think of all the things that happen in
  • 81:34 - 81:36
    that year, and ask yourself, "Would that
  • 81:36 - 81:38
    have happened 10 years ago? Would have
  • 81:38 - 81:41
    happened five years ago?" In your wildest
  • 81:41 - 81:42
    dreams, did you think all of these things
  • 81:42 - 81:45
    would happen just last year? This
  • 81:45 - 81:48
    industry has come incredibly far in
  • 81:48 - 81:51
    terms of being a mainstream player in
  • 81:51 - 81:54
    the American economy in terms of being
  • 81:54 - 81:56
    accepted coast-to-coast. Eighty-five
  • 81:56 - 81:58
    percent of the American public. Now,
  • 81:58 - 81:59
    saying that they're perfectly
  • 81:59 - 82:01
    comfortable with casinos for themselves.
  • 82:01 - 82:03
    Their friends, their family were
  • 82:03 - 82:05
    mainstream. How do we take advantage of
  • 82:05 - 82:07
    it? These are the external factors that
  • 82:07 - 82:09
    are helping us as an industry? There are
  • 82:09 - 82:11
    also several, I think, internal and, excuse
  • 82:11 - 82:13
    me, internal factors inter industry
  • 82:13 - 82:16
    factors that are changing who we are
  • 82:16 - 82:18
    increasingly. I want to talk about these
  • 82:18 - 82:21
    three increasingly or a unified industry
  • 82:21 - 82:22
    for those of you that have been in Las
  • 82:22 - 82:24
    Vegas for some time, for those of you
  • 82:24 - 82:25
    that have been close to the gaming
  • 82:25 - 82:28
    industry, you know, that unity
  • 82:28 - 82:31
    collaboration. These are not hallmarks of
  • 82:31 - 82:34
    the casino gaming industry, but they are
  • 82:34 - 82:37
    critical to our future success. I often
  • 82:37 - 82:39
    talk about my own team asked me not to
  • 82:39 - 82:41
    talk about it, but we're much better at
  • 82:41 - 82:42
    having a circular firing squad in this
  • 82:42 - 82:44
    industry than we are about getting in a
  • 82:44 - 82:46
    straight line, and focusing on a common
  • 82:46 - 82:48
    target. Increasingly, we're identifying,
  • 82:48 - 82:52
    who, when, what that common target is the
  • 82:52 - 82:54
    American Gaming Association of today. My
  • 82:54 - 82:56
    organization was created. It was modeled
  • 82:56 - 82:58
    after the Motion Picture Association. If
  • 82:58 - 82:59
    you know anything about that
  • 82:59 - 83:01
    organization, Jack Valenti created it
  • 83:01 - 83:03
    years ago. It was the Six Day
  • 83:03 - 83:05
    studio heads in Los Angeles, and they
  • 83:05 - 83:07
    created this organization in Washington,
  • 83:07 - 83:09
    and they sent him one of two messages.
  • 83:09 - 83:11
    Either do what we tell you to do or
  • 83:11 - 83:12
    leave us the hell alone.
  • 83:12 - 83:14
    That was the MPAA message. A
  • 83:14 - 83:17
    simplified that it created the big, you
  • 83:17 - 83:18
    know, the big six from here on the Las
  • 83:18 - 83:20
    Vegas Strip. It had one simple message
  • 83:20 - 83:22
    for Washington: leave us the hell alone.
  • 83:22 - 83:25
    and that was the exclusive club that the
  • 83:25 - 83:28
    HEA was today. We're different today. We
  • 83:28 - 83:30
    represent that unified industry that
  • 83:30 - 83:32
    gaming is becoming we represent ninety
  • 83:32 - 83:34
    percent of all the revenue and
  • 83:34 - 83:36
    commercial gaming. Ninety five percent of
  • 83:36 - 83:39
    all the supplier revenue. That's critical
  • 83:39 - 83:42
    to this industry. We represent with just
  • 83:42 - 83:44
    ten prominent tribes in our organization.
  • 83:44 - 83:48
    A third of all tribal gaming revenue. The
  • 83:48 - 83:50
    industry is increasingly on the same
  • 83:50 - 83:52
    page, and getting in that straight line
  • 83:52 - 83:54
    to focus its sights on issues of common
  • 83:54 - 83:57
    cause. I'm gonna go back there. The second
  • 83:57 - 83:59
    aspect of that that we're doing as an
  • 83:59 - 84:01
    industry is we're beginning to gain
  • 84:01 - 84:04
    confidence or beginning to gain a sense
  • 84:04 - 84:07
    that we can go get stuff done. In 2016
  • 84:07 - 84:10
    alone, this industry saved off three
  • 84:10 - 84:13
    critical attacks from Washington. One: an
  • 84:13 - 84:14
    effort to suggest that our industry
  • 84:14 - 84:16
    didn't take its anti-money laundering
  • 84:16 - 84:19
    compliance efforts seriously, a sense
  • 84:19 - 84:22
    that this industry was not committed to
  • 84:22 - 84:24
    strict regulation and a threat of
  • 84:24 - 84:26
    hundreds of millions of dollars in fines
  • 84:26 - 84:29
    from the federal government. When the
  • 84:29 - 84:31
    head of the agency in Washington left
  • 84:31 - 84:33
    her role after getting to know this
  • 84:33 - 84:35
    industry and getting exposed to the
  • 84:35 - 84:36
    people in this industry, her message was,
  • 84:36 - 84:39
    "Your industry actually has a good story
  • 84:39 - 84:41
    to tell our industry." The gaming industry
  • 84:41 - 84:44
    is that a model for others in financial
  • 84:44 - 84:47
    services as to how to do anti-money
  • 84:47 - 84:50
    laundering compliance right when the IRS
  • 84:50 - 84:51
    said, we want to lower slop tax
  • 84:51 - 84:55
    thresholds from $1,200 to $600. And we
  • 84:55 - 84:56
    want to use all those loyalty marketing
  • 84:56 - 84:58
    cards that many of you probably play
  • 84:58 - 85:01
    with. We want to use those to track what
  • 85:01 - 85:03
    people are doing in the casinos that was
  • 85:03 - 85:05
    the proposal from the IRS. This industry
  • 85:05 - 85:07
    stood up it worked in a collaborative
  • 85:07 - 85:09
    fashion. It prevented that from happening
  • 85:09 - 85:12
    Also last year, when the federal
  • 85:12 - 85:14
    government set out to eliminate those
  • 85:14 - 85:16
    resort fees that Jeremy mentioned.
  • 85:16 - 85:18
    Resort fees that not everyone likes but
  • 85:18 - 85:20
    are worth a half a billion dollars on
  • 85:20 - 85:23
    the Las Vegas Strip alone. This industry
  • 85:23 - 85:24
    worked together to prevent that from
  • 85:24 - 85:28
    happening three critical successes. There
  • 85:28 - 85:29
    were only made possible because of the
  • 85:29 - 85:32
    unity of the industry and three critical
  • 85:32 - 85:33
    successes that give the industry
  • 85:33 - 85:36
    confidence. Next, we can do a lot more we
  • 85:36 - 85:38
    can make other great things happen.
  • 85:38 - 85:39
    The other great thing that make
  • 85:39 - 85:42
    positions us for future success is we're
  • 85:42 - 85:44
    not putting our head in the sand. We see
  • 85:44 - 85:46
    what's coming down the pike. We see what
  • 85:46 - 85:48
    the new issues are that are emerging. We
  • 85:48 - 85:49
    see the development of daily fantasy
  • 85:49 - 85:51
    sports and east boards of skill-based
  • 85:51 - 85:54
    games outside Nevada. The development
  • 85:54 - 85:56
    of what's called convenience gaming,
  • 85:56 - 85:58
    retail gaming, distributed gaming,
  • 85:58 - 85:58
    whatever you want to call it.
  • 85:58 - 86:01
    Machines and bars and taverns around the
  • 86:01 - 86:04
    country, we realize these challenges are
  • 86:04 - 86:05
    out there, and we're confronting them
  • 86:05 - 86:06
    head-on.
  • 86:06 - 86:09
    We're asking ourselves and for a 240
  • 86:09 - 86:11
    billion dollar industry today. How do we
  • 86:11 - 86:12
    become a 300 billion dollar industry
  • 86:12 - 86:15
    tomorrow? And how do we work with these
  • 86:15 - 86:17
    newfound challenges that are out there?
  • 86:17 - 86:20
    It's that type of bold thinking and
  • 86:20 - 86:22
    leadership that I think sets this
  • 86:22 - 86:24
    industry with these other factors, sets
  • 86:24 - 86:26
    this industry up for tremendous success.
  • 86:26 - 86:30
    In the future, I think we are paid to do
  • 86:30 - 86:32
    position to do great things in the years
  • 86:32 - 86:34
    ahead and to areas I want to highlight
  • 86:34 - 86:36
    for you. And you might be thinking to
  • 86:36 - 86:37
    yourself, "Well, we have these things in
  • 86:37 - 86:39
    Nevada, so why does that matter to me?" I'm
  • 86:39 - 86:41
    going to close by coming back why these
  • 86:41 - 86:42
    things that are going to happen
  • 86:42 - 86:44
    elsewhere in the United States, matter
  • 86:44 - 86:46
    and matter in a very good way right here.
  • 86:46 - 86:48
    In Nevada, the first tremendous
  • 86:48 - 86:50
    opportunity in front of this industry is
  • 86:50 - 86:53
    to take what Nevada has today. A legal
  • 86:53 - 86:55
    regulated sports betting market and
  • 86:55 - 86:57
    permit every state in the country to opt
  • 86:57 - 86:59
    into this if they so choose, you know,
  • 86:59 - 87:01
    there was a long time where Nevada felt.
  • 87:01 - 87:03
    Hey, we've got a monopoly on sports
  • 87:03 - 87:04
    betting. Why would we want to share this
  • 87:04 - 87:06
    with anybody else? We get all those
  • 87:06 - 87:07
    people coming here for the Super Bowl. We
  • 87:07 - 87:09
    get people coming here for March Madness.
  • 87:09 - 87:11
    Maybe, we won't have people coming here
  • 87:11 - 87:14
    if sports betting is permitted elsewhere.
  • 87:14 - 87:16
    Well, here's the dirty truth. There's no
  • 87:16 - 87:20
    monopoly here in Nevada. Last year, 4.7
  • 87:20 - 87:22
    billion dollars was wagered on the Super
  • 87:22 - 87:25
    Bowl. Three percent of that was wagered
  • 87:25 - 87:28
    legally here in Nevada. 160 billion
  • 87:28 - 87:29
    dollars was
  • 87:29 - 87:32
    spent on sports betting across the
  • 87:32 - 87:34
    United States. 3% of that was done
  • 87:34 - 87:36
    illegally here in Nevada. Americans are
  • 87:36 - 87:38
    finding a way to wager on sports. There
  • 87:38 - 87:41
    is incredible demand to be involved in
  • 87:41 - 87:43
    these games. Daily fantasy sports which
  • 87:43 - 87:46
    got all the attention is the tip of the
  • 87:46 - 87:48
    iceberg when it comes to how people want
  • 87:48 - 87:50
    to be engaged in games today and the
  • 87:50 - 87:52
    question becomes, "How do we open up these
  • 87:52 - 87:55
    other markets around the country to
  • 87:55 - 87:57
    enjoy this same product to regulate this
  • 87:57 - 87:59
    product to prove that they can regulate
  • 87:59 - 88:01
    effectively sports the same way they
  • 88:01 - 88:03
    regulate every other form of gaming?" I
  • 88:03 - 88:05
    think we're on the cusp of doing that.
  • 88:05 - 88:07
    You've got League leaders coming out and
  • 88:07 - 88:09
    saying it's time for regulation> Adam
  • 88:09 - 88:11
    Silver of the NBA leading the way and
  • 88:11 - 88:13
    others following. You've got law
  • 88:13 - 88:14
    enforcement increasingly coming to the
  • 88:14 - 88:16
    table to say that our resources are best
  • 88:16 - 88:19
    spent not trying to track down illegal
  • 88:19 - 88:22
    sports bettors, but to focus on other
  • 88:22 - 88:24
    more serious crimes. You've got states
  • 88:24 - 88:26
    and municipalities. The US Conference of
  • 88:26 - 88:27
    Mayors the National Conference of State
  • 88:27 - 88:30
    Legislators. And many others saying, it's
  • 88:30 - 88:32
    time to regulate in this area, I think
  • 88:32 - 88:34
    and I have said publicly in the first
  • 88:34 - 88:37
    term of the Trump administration sports
  • 88:37 - 88:39
    betting will be legalized or at least
  • 88:39 - 88:41
    Washington will get out of the way to
  • 88:41 - 88:43
    empower other states. They have sports
  • 88:43 - 88:45
    betting. Now, a disclaimer when I said
  • 88:45 - 88:46
    that I didn't realize this first term
  • 88:46 - 88:52
    might be shorter than usual. I think we
  • 88:52 - 88:52
    will get this done.
  • 88:52 - 88:54
    I'm confident we will get this done. It
  • 88:54 - 88:56
    is a multi-billion dollar growth
  • 88:56 - 88:58
    opportunity for the industry around the
  • 88:58 - 89:00
    country, and it's a growth opportunity
  • 89:00 - 89:02
    right here in Nevada. The other thing we
  • 89:02 - 89:05
    have to do as an industry absolutely
  • 89:05 - 89:06
    have to do, and this is where in many
  • 89:06 - 89:10
    senses, Nevada is a model we have to
  • 89:10 - 89:13
    improve reform the regulation that
  • 89:13 - 89:15
    guides this industry in the other 40
  • 89:15 - 89:16
    states, in which we're doing business. You
  • 89:16 - 89:18
    know when casino gaming expanded beyond
  • 89:18 - 89:21
    Nevada and New Jersey, and it went into
  • 89:21 - 89:23
    these other states. These other states
  • 89:23 - 89:24
    thought they were bringing in a great
  • 89:24 - 89:26
    evil a great sin. And they wanted to do
  • 89:26 - 89:28
    everything they could to get the revenue
  • 89:28 - 89:29
    from it, but paralyzed every other
  • 89:29 - 89:32
    activity there with it. The speed to
  • 89:32 - 89:34
    market of new machines, the ability to
  • 89:34 - 89:35
    innovate with new products in these
  • 89:35 - 89:37
    other markets, it's quite difficult the
  • 89:37 - 89:39
    ability to reinvest in your product when
  • 89:39 - 89:42
    you have 50 / 60 % tax rates in these
  • 89:42 - 89:43
    other states. It's quite
  • 89:43 - 89:45
    physical, our future success as an
  • 89:45 - 89:49
    industry demands that we've modernized
  • 89:49 - 89:51
    these regulations. in every other state
  • 89:51 - 89:53
    in which we're doing business now, the
  • 89:53 - 89:54
    obvious question on all these
  • 89:54 - 89:56
    modernizing regulations and sports
  • 89:56 - 89:59
    betting: "Why is that good for Nevada?' two
  • 89:59 - 90:03
    reasons. One as we've seen the gaming
  • 90:03 - 90:05
    industry, thrive and other communities
  • 90:05 - 90:06
    around this country.
  • 90:06 - 90:09
    Nevada's success has only increased
  • 90:09 - 90:12
    upwards of 50 million visitors. Now, to
  • 90:12 - 90:14
    Las Vegas, there was a fear when tribal
  • 90:14 - 90:17
    gaming came on in California that we see
  • 90:17 - 90:19
    a decline in visitation to Las Vegas.
  • 90:19 - 90:20
    don't think anyone's making that
  • 90:20 - 90:23
    argument today. As gaming thrives and
  • 90:23 - 90:26
    other markets gaming goes mainstream
  • 90:26 - 90:29
    Nevada's success only increases, it is in
  • 90:29 - 90:32
    Nevada's interest to see sports betting
  • 90:32 - 90:34
    legalized elsewhere. We don't want to be
  • 90:34 - 90:36
    the anomaly. We don't want to be this
  • 90:36 - 90:37
    thing that's okay here but illegal
  • 90:37 - 90:40
    everywhere else. We want what we do here
  • 90:40 - 90:42
    to become and practice a mainstream
  • 90:42 - 90:44
    industry. The second reason. This is
  • 90:44 - 90:47
    critical as so long, as we have all these
  • 90:47 - 90:48
    different policies and antiquated
  • 90:48 - 90:50
    approaches to gaming everywhere outside
  • 90:50 - 90:53
    Nevada. The ability to innovate in Nevada
  • 90:53 - 90:56
    remains difficult, the cost to do this
  • 90:56 - 90:59
    research and development the cost to
  • 90:59 - 91:02
    build these new products, and really give
  • 91:02 - 91:03
    tomorrow's customer what it is that
  • 91:03 - 91:05
    they're looking for is extraordinarily
  • 91:05 - 91:08
    difficult with the inefficiencies that
  • 91:08 - 91:10
    we have across the country the more we
  • 91:10 - 91:12
    can streamline that the more we can get
  • 91:12 - 91:14
    a level playing field around the country.
  • 91:14 - 91:17
    Nevada, which is the home to so much of
  • 91:17 - 91:19
    this innovation, the homes that some of
  • 91:19 - 91:21
    the biggest suppliers in this industry
  • 91:21 - 91:24
    stands to benefit, and that's why what is
  • 91:24 - 91:26
    good for gaming outside of Nevada is
  • 91:26 - 91:29
    good for Nevada. And it's our focus at
  • 91:29 - 91:31
    the aga, it's our focus every day to
  • 91:31 - 91:34
    strengthen this industry. I'm confident
  • 91:34 - 91:36
    that the future for the gaming industry
  • 91:36 - 91:38
    has never been brighter and the future
  • 91:38 - 91:40
    right here in Nevada has never been
  • 91:40 - 91:42
    brighter. The aga is committed every day
  • 91:42 - 91:44
    to working on behalf of the gaming
  • 91:44 - 91:46
    industry many of you in this room to
  • 91:46 - 91:48
    build an environment where the casino
  • 91:48 - 91:52
    gaming industry can thrive. My ask of
  • 91:52 - 91:54
    each of you in this room is to be our
  • 91:54 - 91:55
    partner in doing that to help us
  • 91:55 - 91:56
    understand.
  • 91:56 - 91:58
    There are the challenges where are the
  • 91:58 - 91:59
    roadblocks. Where are the issues that
  • 91:59 - 92:01
    need to be addressed? Because the
  • 92:01 - 92:04
    industry has never been more capable to
  • 92:04 - 92:05
    get in those roadblocks those challenges
  • 92:05 - 92:07
    out of the way right now. It's about
  • 92:07 - 92:10
    capitalizing on the opportunity we have
  • 92:10 - 92:12
    building on the success we've enjoyed
  • 92:12 - 92:14
    and building the strongest industry that
  • 92:14 - 92:15
    we can have in the years ahead I'm
  • 92:15 - 92:16
    confident that we're well on our way
  • 92:16 - 92:18
    there thank you for the opportunity I
  • 92:18 - 92:20
    don't we want to take any questions I
  • 92:20 - 92:29
    really appreciate the opportunity yes
  • 92:29 - 92:32
    sir excellent we do have time for just a
  • 92:32 - 92:34
    couple questions from the audience we've
  • 92:34 - 92:36
    got a roving mic out there Jeff is a
  • 92:36 - 92:38
    graciously agreed to stay on for a
  • 92:38 - 92:40
    couple minutes from the audience that
  • 92:40 - 92:42
    was a powerhouse presentation first. Can
  • 92:42 - 92:45
    we give him another round of applause?
  • 92:48 - 92:50
    If no-one has any questions, I see a
  • 92:50 - 92:52
    couple faces I recognize including
  • 92:52 - 92:53
    Marcus over there a couple others so
  • 92:53 - 92:57
    I'll just call on you: Ask questions.
  • 92:57 - 93:03
    Anybody going going once going twice
  • 93:03 - 93:06
    alright. Thank you very much again.
  • 93:06 - 93:11
    thank you Jeff I'm not closed with this
  • 93:11 - 93:13
    I hope you had fun this morning. I know I
  • 93:13 - 93:15
    did, and it is our sincere hope that the
  • 93:15 - 93:17
    perspectives you hope that you heard
  • 93:17 - 93:20
    today will be of assistance as you make
  • 93:20 - 93:22
    your critical decisions throughout the
  • 93:22 - 93:24
    upcoming year again thank you for coming.
  • 93:24 - 93:27
    Have a good day.
Title:
2017 LVGEA Las Vegas Perspective Event
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Duration:
01:33:42

English subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions