< Return to Video

Parte II - Triplicidad de aire: Libra

  • 0:18 - 0:21
    The second sign of the air triplicity
  • 0:21 - 0:24
    is Libra. Based on that basic structure
  • 0:24 - 0:26
    we always start by, we'd say
  • 0:26 - 0:28
    that Libra seems to hesitate.
  • 0:28 - 0:32
    I say ‘seems’ because, the reality is that
  • 0:33 - 0:36
    Libra doesn't hesitate. Libras are quite
  • 0:36 - 0:37
    clear about what they want.
  • 0:37 - 0:39
    Libra's problem is that they don't
  • 0:39 - 0:42
    allow themselves that. This is why
  • 0:42 - 0:45
    they experience doubt and oscillation,
  • 0:45 - 0:47
    finding themselves in a kind of
  • 0:47 - 0:50
    perpetual crossroads.
  • 0:50 - 0:53
    This can eventually block them,
  • 0:53 - 0:55
    leading to inaction, as they remain
  • 0:55 - 0:58
    stuck in what they already have.
  • 0:59 - 1:02
    As we'll see, this is linked to the reluctance
  • 1:02 - 1:06
    to allow oneself to display who one is,
  • 1:06 - 1:08
    measured against an ideal of perfection
  • 1:08 - 1:10
    regarding what one ought to be.
  • 1:10 - 1:13
    And we will see how, from that ideal
  • 1:13 - 1:16
    of ​​perfection, Libra convince themselves
  • 1:16 - 1:18
    of things like they don't want to harm
  • 1:18 - 1:20
    or affect others, or the like.
  • 1:20 - 1:22
    In truth, when Libras are
  • 1:22 - 1:24
    expressing themselves from the limitation
  • 1:24 - 1:27
    they are not worried about
  • 1:27 - 1:29
    connecting or sharing with others.
  • 1:29 - 1:31
    They don't care about others.
  • 1:31 - 1:34
    What matters to them is aligning with
  • 1:34 - 1:36
    their own ideals of ​​perfection, balance,
  • 1:36 - 1:38
    harmony and beauty they have
  • 1:38 - 1:41
    about themselves. Hence,
  • 1:41 - 1:43
    they are not their true selves,
  • 1:43 - 1:45
    rather what they believe
  • 1:45 - 1:49
    they have to be to attain this balance,
  • 1:51 - 1:54
    this idealised perfection.
  • 1:54 - 1:57
    Well, faced with this limitation that
  • 1:57 - 2:00
    constrains them, their virtue is firmness.
  • 2:00 - 2:03
    Libra, to me, has to do with
  • 2:03 - 2:05
    standing in our own right.
  • 2:05 - 2:08
    Being aligned with our heartbeat, with
  • 2:08 - 2:10
    what we feel deep within.
  • 2:10 - 2:13
    Regardless of whether or not it aligns
  • 2:13 - 2:15
    with a concept of "having to be"
  • 2:15 - 2:18
    or "needing to be" something.
  • 2:18 - 2:21
    Libra is part of the incarnation quatern.
  • 2:21 - 2:23
    Finds its opposition in Aries,
  • 2:23 - 2:28
    therefore, any placement in Libra
  • 2:28 - 2:31
    must be integrated with the oscillation in
  • 2:31 - 2:34
    Aries. Otherwise you’d be working
  • 2:34 - 2:36
    with an incomplete Libra,
  • 2:36 - 2:39
    fragmentarily, as Gemini would do
  • 2:39 - 2:41
    by the way.
  • 2:41 - 2:45
    Right? They tend to fragmentation.
  • 2:45 - 2:47
    We need to look systemically
  • 2:47 - 2:49
    at the quaternary structure
  • 2:49 - 2:51
    because it integrates all the
  • 2:51 - 2:54
    constituent substances, the four
  • 2:54 - 2:57
    elements or foundations of everything.
  • 2:57 - 2:59
    Aries is Libra’s opposition,
  • 2:59 - 3:01
    and Cancer and Capricorn are
  • 3:01 - 3:03
    the unconscious dualities.
  • 3:07 - 3:09
    Let's see if we can feel this, briefly,
  • 3:09 - 3:13
    let's close our eyes for a moment.
  • 3:13 - 3:16
    Here's a description that I do
  • 3:16 - 3:19
    of the typology range I've just explained
  • 3:19 - 3:23
    that leads us from limitation to virtue.
  • 3:25 - 3:28
    Feel yourself in this.
  • 3:28 - 3:32
    Observe yourselves in Libra’s limitation.
  • 3:33 - 3:37
    Observe your moral self-repression,
  • 3:38 - 3:42
    notice how you idealise what you
  • 3:42 - 3:45
    supposedly have to be, in harmony
  • 3:45 - 3:48
    from a mandate of perfection.
  • 3:51 - 3:54
    Observe to what extent you hinder
  • 3:54 - 3:58
    what calls you and whispers inside you.
  • 3:59 - 4:01
    How that self-imposed ought to be
  • 4:01 - 4:06
    doesn’t let you unfold what you are.
  • 4:07 - 4:11
    Look how, by doing that, you probably
  • 4:11 - 4:14
    avoid feeling bad about your behaviour,
  • 4:15 - 4:18
    while attempting to comply with something
  • 4:18 - 4:21
    or someone to whom, deep down,
  • 4:21 - 4:23
    you feel submissive to.
  • 4:23 - 4:27
    Seeking harmony at any cost.
  • 4:32 - 4:35
    So, we start telling ourselves
  • 4:35 - 4:38
    phrases like these ones.
  • 4:38 - 4:41
    When you tell yourself, for example
  • 4:41 - 4:45
    "I won't do that, I'm sure it'll hurt him”.
  • 4:47 - 4:50
    As if we could harm someone,
  • 4:53 - 4:56
    when, it's really them, who
  • 4:56 - 4:59
    inflict damage upon themselves
  • 4:59 - 5:03
    when our actions diverge from who
  • 5:03 - 5:06
    they require us to be for them.
  • 5:07 - 5:10
    We never cause harm by being.
  • 5:10 - 5:13
    In reality, others have made us theirs,
  • 5:13 - 5:17
    expecting that our behaviour will satisfy
  • 5:17 - 5:20
    their decision about what we have to be.
  • 5:20 - 5:23
    When making us their possession.
  • 5:23 - 5:26
    Or we say to each other:
  • 5:26 - 5:28
    “Forgive me, I didn't think it was going to
  • 5:28 - 5:31
    affect you like this”.
  • 5:31 - 5:35
    Or “don't worry, I'll do it as you say”.
  • 5:35 - 5:37
    Or, when we say to ourselves:
  • 5:37 - 5:39
    “I can't do that, that's immoral,
  • 5:39 - 5:41
    I better not do anything”.
  • 5:45 - 5:48
    Well...
  • 5:48 - 5:50
    let's start from here
  • 5:50 - 5:51
    and observe Libra,
  • 5:51 - 5:55
    which also has potential.
  • 5:55 - 5:58
    As was also the case with Gemini,
  • 5:58 - 6:04
    Libra is active, sociable, extroverted.
  • 6:04 - 6:10
    Rather than analytical, Libra is practical.
  • 6:12 - 6:15
    And, as I have said, it has the potential
  • 6:15 - 6:19
    to achieve balance, encounters
  • 6:21 - 6:23
    and complementary relationships.
  • 6:23 - 6:27
    Potential to generate dialogue,
  • 6:27 - 6:32
    harmony, peace, cordiality, sensitivity.
  • 6:33 - 6:35
    But from the limiting structures
  • 6:35 - 6:38
    that we are going to analyse, we’ll
  • 6:38 - 6:41
    be able to see how all this ends up
  • 6:41 - 6:47
    in distortion, leading to self-aggression.
  • 6:48 - 6:50
    As you can see, first I mention:
  • 6:50 - 6:54
    -Feeling of being at a crossroads-
  • 6:54 - 6:57
    Within the limitation, Libras live
  • 6:57 - 7:03
    at a crossroads, as if teared between
  • 7:03 - 7:06
    two options, oscillating, in a permanent
  • 7:06 - 7:10
    state of division permanently
  • 7:11 - 7:13
    taking them to choice,
  • 7:13 - 7:16
    they live stuck in a constant polarity.
  • 7:16 - 7:19
    They constantly change their mind,
  • 7:19 - 7:21
    successively oscillating
  • 7:21 - 7:24
    between “this is right, this is wrong”.
  • 7:24 - 7:27
    This stems from Libra’s illusion,
  • 7:27 - 7:30
    according to their ideal of ​​perfection,
  • 7:30 - 7:33
    that there is only one right answer.
  • 7:35 - 7:38
    Unlike what we saw in Taurus
  • 7:38 - 7:40
    -this must also be highlighted-
  • 7:40 - 7:45
    that feeling of crossroads that
  • 7:46 - 7:48
    sometimes leads Libras to a blockage,
  • 7:48 - 7:53
    is not linked with previous experiences,
  • 7:53 - 7:57
    but rather with a moral mandate
  • 7:58 - 8:00
    of being good people.
  • 8:00 - 8:03
    In Libra, when we express ourselves
  • 8:03 - 8:05
    from our authenticity,
  • 8:05 - 8:08
    if that is not align with our morals,
  • 8:08 - 8:12
    we feel bad people, it feels wrong.
  • 8:12 - 8:15
    We feel in transgression of
  • 8:15 - 8:18
    family mandates, religious norms,
  • 8:18 - 8:22
    societal standards or legal norms.
  • 8:22 - 8:23
    Right?
  • 8:26 - 8:29
    We could say that Libras live from
  • 8:29 - 8:31
    their morals rather than their ethics.
  • 8:31 - 8:34
    Ethics and morals are different.
  • 8:35 - 8:37
    ‘Morals’ refer to the norm within
  • 8:37 - 8:40
    a specific time. For instance, our laws
  • 8:40 - 8:44
    and government regulations are morals.
  • 8:44 - 8:45
    Aren't they?
  • 8:46 - 8:50
    They are like conventions imposed on us.
  • 8:51 - 8:55
    So, in the face of that,
  • 8:55 - 8:59
    whether it’s legal matters, but also
  • 8:59 - 9:02
    religious patterns, family mandates
  • 9:02 - 9:03
    or any other kind
  • 9:03 - 9:06
    of standard to which we subject
  • 9:06 - 9:09
    and submit ourselves, in the face
  • 9:09 - 9:11
    of that is what we feel, which
  • 9:11 - 9:13
    frequently doesn't align with it.
  • 9:13 - 9:16
    In the context of Libra's limitations,
  • 9:16 - 9:19
    we relinquish the clear call we feel.
  • 9:19 - 9:22
    That’s why I said at the beginning
  • 9:22 - 9:24
    that it is not true that Libras
  • 9:24 - 9:25
    don't know what they want.
  • 9:25 - 9:29
    It is said that Libras hesitate.
  • 9:29 - 9:33
    They don't doubt what they feel
  • 9:33 - 9:37
    or want, but rather their right to do it.
  • 9:38 - 9:40
    That is what must be dissolved in Libra,
  • 9:40 - 9:43
    the notion that I don't have the right to
  • 9:43 - 9:44
    be what I am.
  • 9:44 - 9:47
    But, in order to do that we need
  • 9:47 - 9:54
    to face the external voices telling us
  • 9:54 - 9:58
    who we should be.
  • 9:58 - 10:01
    And, as we well know, this is not
  • 10:01 - 10:04
    easy to do. But it is Libra’s
  • 10:04 - 10:07
    virtuous expression. To be
  • 10:07 - 10:12
    what we are, beyond any ideal
  • 10:12 - 10:15
    or ‘ought to be’.
  • 10:15 - 10:19
    To be faithful to ourselves. To feel
  • 10:19 - 10:22
    entitled to be, aligned with our
  • 10:23 - 10:25
    inner compass.
  • 10:27 - 10:30
    Also related to Libra...
  • 10:30 - 10:34
    as a second indication of limitation
  • 10:34 - 10:38
    and, in that line, linked to the above
  • 10:38 - 10:42
    there's: -Inconstancy, instability-
  • 10:42 - 10:45
    Libra’s energy tends to oscillate.
  • 10:45 - 10:48
    But they do this because, as they
  • 10:48 - 10:50
    oscillate and feel at a crossroads,
  • 10:50 - 10:52
    as we've just seen
  • 10:52 - 10:55
    as they entertain themselves with
  • 10:55 - 10:57
    narratives about their doubts,
  • 10:57 - 11:01
    about not wanting to create conflict,
  • 11:01 - 11:04
    disharmony, imbalance, etc.,
  • 11:04 - 11:07
    what they are really doing is
  • 11:07 - 11:10
    steering clear from being coherent
  • 11:10 - 11:12
    to what they feel,
  • 11:12 - 11:14
    ignoring their heartbeat. This is
  • 11:14 - 11:18
    Libra’s challenge to unfold their potential.
  • 11:18 - 11:21
    For that reason, I insist, we need
  • 11:21 - 11:25
    to dissolve the deeply entrenched idea
  • 11:25 - 11:30
    that has penetrated so deeply
  • 11:30 - 11:32
    that there’s ‘a right way’.
  • 11:32 - 11:36
    That some things are ‘right’ or 'wrong'.
  • 11:37 - 11:40
    How can we do that?
  • 11:43 - 11:48
    How can we believe that
  • 11:48 - 11:51
    our views are the right ones,
  • 11:51 - 11:54
    and everything different to that is wrong?
  • 11:54 - 11:55
    That one way of living is
  • 11:55 - 11:58
    right and another one is wrong?
  • 11:59 - 12:03
    How can we come to have an
  • 12:03 - 12:06
    homogenising outlook, to the extent
  • 12:06 - 12:09
    where it seems that all beings have to
  • 12:09 - 12:12
    perceive and feel the same?
  • 12:12 - 12:14
    To be summoned, called, urged
  • 12:14 - 12:16
    or cited to the same thing?
  • 12:16 - 12:18
    To have the same understanding
  • 12:18 - 12:21
    and experience in the same way?
  • 12:21 - 12:27
    When I worked in the Constitutional Court
  • 12:27 - 12:30
    I was in a good financial position, right?
  • 12:30 - 12:32
    So, when I decided that I wanted to
  • 12:32 - 12:35
    do this for a living, there were people
  • 12:35 - 12:37
    who told me that I was crazy.
  • 12:37 - 12:41
    For instance, my own mother.
  • 12:41 - 12:44
    Maybe some of you have heard this before.
  • 12:44 - 12:46
    She’d tell me: “But, how are you going
  • 12:46 - 12:49
    to quit the Constitutional Court?”
  • 12:49 - 12:52
    And I’d reply: “the one who is working
  • 12:52 - 12:54
    at the Constitutional Court is not
  • 12:54 - 12:57
    who I am, but who I was. So, there’s
  • 12:57 - 13:00
    no purpose for me being there anymore”.
  • 13:00 - 13:03
    And she’d go: “but that provides you with
  • 13:03 - 13:05
    security, stability, prestige, etc.”.
  • 13:05 - 13:07
    And then I’d say: “If you like it so much
  • 13:07 - 13:10
    you should go to Constitutional Court”.
  • 13:10 - 13:13
    Why do I have to make decisions and live
  • 13:13 - 13:16
    against my heart that is telling me
  • 13:16 - 13:18
    to do something else
  • 13:20 - 13:23
    since I feel how that beckons me?
  • 13:23 - 13:25
    Right? So we need to break those
  • 13:25 - 13:28
    patterns. And, we can easily agree on this
  • 13:28 - 13:30
    but if we get into more
  • 13:30 - 13:33
    slippery territories, we might start
  • 13:33 - 13:35
    to disagree.
  • 13:35 - 13:43
    On the idea we often have of faithfulness
  • 13:43 - 13:50
    in our relationships, in our connections.
  • 13:50 - 13:54
    Loyalty to people in our lives.
  • 13:54 - 13:59
    That's a misunderstanding of loyalty.
  • 13:59 - 14:02
    We tend to impose patterns
  • 14:02 - 14:04
    and standards, that stem from our
  • 14:04 - 14:07
    understanding of the world.
  • 14:07 - 14:08
    So...
  • 14:08 - 14:11
    Embracing Libra means realising that
  • 14:11 - 14:13
    I have the right not to be
  • 14:13 - 14:15
    in compliance of a pattern
  • 14:15 - 14:17
    moreover, comprehending that
  • 14:17 - 14:21
    others operate under diverse ideas,
  • 14:21 - 14:26
    which don’t necessarily have to
  • 14:26 - 14:29
    align with mine.
  • 14:32 - 14:36
    This is crucial. But, while Libras
  • 14:36 - 14:38
    distract themselves with
  • 14:38 - 14:40
    not allowing their own expresion,
  • 14:40 - 14:43
    due to their oscillation and instability.
  • 14:43 - 14:45
    So, Libras, for instance,
  • 14:45 - 14:47
    not only change position
  • 14:47 - 14:50
    regarding what is right or wrong, they
  • 14:50 - 14:53
    also change conversations, go through
  • 14:53 - 14:56
    sudden mood swings -from joy to sadness,
  • 14:56 - 14:58
    from apathy to hyperactivity- or
  • 14:58 - 15:03
    through different emotional states, constantly.
  • 15:03 - 15:05
    All this damage their credibility,
  • 15:05 - 15:08
    others don’t take them seriously.
  • 15:08 - 15:10
    Why would them, when they don’t
  • 15:10 - 15:13
    express themselves wholeheartedly?
  • 15:13 - 15:16
    They also wish to experience everything,
  • 15:16 - 15:19
    not being able to choose, to leave
  • 15:19 - 15:21
    something out. They convince
  • 15:21 - 15:24
    themselves that they can have it all
  • 15:24 - 15:28
    -at least in their minds-, and they think
  • 15:28 - 15:30
    that, if they make a decision, if they
  • 15:30 - 15:33
    finally overcome the crossroads,
  • 15:33 - 15:35
    there will be no turning point
  • 15:35 - 15:37
    and they will lose something.
  • 15:37 - 15:39
    So, behind those narratives
  • 15:39 - 15:41
    what they do is puting off a decision.
  • 15:41 - 15:44
    Being in the decision means facing the
  • 15:44 - 15:46
    tension between our inner hunch and
  • 15:46 - 15:50
    the pattern we are subjected to.
  • 15:50 - 15:52
    That’s why they oscillate
  • 15:52 - 15:53
    and refrain from action.
  • 15:53 - 15:56
    They avoid being and taking action
  • 15:56 - 16:01
    because they can’t stand the feeling of
  • 16:01 - 16:02
    not complying with
  • 16:02 - 16:06
    what they think they need to be.
  • 16:08 - 16:10
    That is why Edward Bach
  • 16:10 - 16:12
    when talking about these
  • 16:12 - 16:15
    oscillatory states for example,
  • 16:15 - 16:19
    said that Libra’s flower essence
  • 16:19 - 16:23
    -Scleranthus- was extremely useful
  • 16:23 - 16:25
    for tremors, feeling of vertigo, dizziness,
  • 16:25 - 16:28
    and imbalance. When we manifest
  • 16:28 - 16:31
    these symptoms, it’s often linked to this.
  • 16:31 - 16:33
    To the fact that we are not allowing
  • 16:33 - 16:36
    ourselves to be according to what we feel.
  • 16:36 - 16:39
    We are oscillating, teared,
  • 16:39 - 16:42
    experiencing imbalance
  • 16:42 - 16:44
    as there is an inner struggle between
  • 16:44 - 16:46
    the one who feels something
  • 16:46 - 16:50
    and one who goes against his feelings.
  • 16:51 - 16:55
    Also, -Avoidance of responsibility-.
  • 16:57 - 17:01
    Not in the same way as Geminis do.
  • 17:01 - 17:04
    It’s not from the need to get it right,
  • 17:04 - 17:05
    to be in the right thing,
  • 17:05 - 17:09
    but rather stems from a self-mandate
  • 17:09 - 17:13
    of not harming others, not losing anything,
  • 17:13 - 17:16
    or not generating disharmony.
  • 17:16 - 17:20
    They obstruct their actions based on that.
  • 17:21 - 17:23
    Another trait is that Libras have
  • 17:23 - 17:25
    a lot of mind control:
  • 17:25 - 17:27
    That is what I mean there by:
  • 17:27 - 17:31
    -Blocking the passage to intuition-.
  • 17:31 - 17:34
    Libras are mental.
  • 17:34 - 17:36
    They restrict themselves based on
  • 17:36 - 17:39
    their minds, their moral standards.
  • 17:39 - 17:44
    They are also emotionally detached.
  • 17:46 - 17:48
    They ground themselves in
  • 17:48 - 17:49
    what they have, rather than
  • 17:49 - 17:51
    truly bonding with others
  • 17:51 - 17:53
    -I mean in the limitation-.
  • 17:53 - 17:56
    That’s because they don't want to harm
  • 17:56 - 17:59
    neither to be harmed, therefore they
  • 17:59 - 18:01
    often don’t make decisions
  • 18:01 - 18:04
    within the territories of the emotional.
  • 18:04 - 18:07
    They stick to what they already have.
  • 18:08 - 18:11
    I also say: “Constraining moral patterns.
  • 18:11 - 18:13
    Meeting social expectations”.
  • 18:14 - 18:16
    I usually observe
  • 18:16 - 18:18
    in Libras some kind of sublimation.
  • 18:18 - 18:20
    It's not the only sign
  • 18:20 - 18:22
    in which I've noticed this, at all.
  • 18:22 - 18:24
    But, there's...
  • 18:28 - 18:34
    They thin down that which entices them
  • 18:34 - 18:36
    it's like...
  • 18:36 - 18:39
    I don't dare to be that so
  • 18:39 - 18:41
    I sublimate it.
  • 18:41 - 18:44
    As being that would require
  • 18:44 - 18:45
    a confrontation.
  • 18:45 - 18:47
    So, it might seem that Libras
  • 18:47 - 18:50
    don't deny themselves the right
  • 18:50 - 18:52
    to be that, but they deny themselves
  • 18:52 - 18:54
    the right to fully experience it.
  • 18:54 - 18:57
    They feel it but don't fully live it.
  • 18:57 - 19:00
    They sublimate it, fearing that
  • 19:00 - 19:04
    devoting to that would inevitably
  • 19:04 - 19:09
    lead to confrontation with the norm
  • 19:09 - 19:11
    that conditions them.
  • 19:12 - 19:17
    Same as we saw in Gemini
  • 19:17 - 19:22
    Libra has more uneven manifestations
  • 19:22 - 19:25
    depending on the level of consciousness
  • 19:25 - 19:28
    we are situated in.
  • 19:28 - 19:30
    What I’ve described so far is
  • 19:30 - 19:33
    Libra’s most primary expression,
  • 19:33 - 19:36
    represented by Schlerantus, speaking
  • 19:36 - 19:39
    in Flower remedies. But when we open
  • 19:39 - 19:41
    ourselves to a higher consciousness
  • 19:41 - 19:43
    a different expression emerges,
  • 19:43 - 19:46
    a different emotional or mental state,
  • 19:46 - 19:49
    that is represented by Honeysuckle.
  • 19:49 - 19:52
    In this state, Libra manifests itself
  • 19:52 - 19:55
    as an evolutionary structure,
  • 19:55 - 19:58
    presenting a discourse of evolution.
  • 19:58 - 20:01
    In a way, when we begin to
  • 20:01 - 20:03
    allow ourselves to be, standing in
  • 20:03 - 20:06
    our own right, and stop being subjected
  • 20:06 - 20:09
    or subdued to moral standards of perfection,
  • 20:09 - 20:11
    of "ought to be".
  • 20:11 - 20:14
    This is Libra’s primary limitation,
  • 20:14 - 20:17
    as I have explained earlier
  • 20:17 - 20:20
    what matters to Libra.
  • 20:20 - 20:23
    Which it’s essentially a relationship
  • 20:23 - 20:25
    with ourselves. No matter how much
  • 20:25 - 20:27
    we tell ourselves we do it
  • 20:27 - 20:30
    for others, it is a way of relating to
  • 20:30 - 20:33
    ourselves within social norms-.
  • 20:33 - 20:36
    When we overcome this and we begin
  • 20:36 - 20:38
    to feel that we have the right to
  • 20:38 - 20:42
    live in authenticity, our Libra’s
  • 20:42 - 20:45
    egoic structures that forced us
  • 20:45 - 20:46
    to deny our right
  • 20:46 - 20:48
    in order to conform to a norm
  • 20:48 - 20:52
    is perfected into the Honeysuckle
  • 20:52 - 20:58
    structure that has to do with evolution.
  • 20:58 - 21:00
    It is very subtle. It is a highly
  • 21:00 - 21:03
    refined egoic trap. Our ego
  • 21:03 - 21:06
    tells us: “okay, you have right to be
  • 21:06 - 21:09
    but you come from your past”.
  • 21:09 - 21:12
    In this way, the self-repression is
  • 21:12 - 21:15
    still present within this evolutionary logic.
  • 21:15 - 21:18
    This is why Honeysuckle clings to the past.
  • 21:18 - 21:21
    Bach’s descriptions of this state
  • 21:21 - 21:24
    are about not letting go of the past.
  • 21:24 - 21:26
    Why the ego doesn’t want us
  • 21:26 - 21:28
    to let go of our past?
  • 21:28 - 21:31
    Because, in order to truly stand in
  • 21:31 - 21:33
    our right, in our authentic being,
  • 21:33 - 21:36
    we need to detach from the notion
  • 21:36 - 21:38
    that we are our history.
  • 21:38 - 21:41
    If we live attached to our past
  • 21:41 - 21:43
    we cannot be in the present, with
  • 21:43 - 21:46
    the level of consciousness we have
  • 21:46 - 21:48
    now, apart from who we’ve been.
  • 21:48 - 21:51
    So, when we are not trapped in norms
  • 21:51 - 21:54
    the Ego remind us who we’ve been,
  • 21:54 - 21:57
    enticing us back into familiar patterns
  • 21:57 - 22:00
    and shaping our expression within
  • 22:00 - 22:03
    the frame of our history. The Ego wants
  • 22:03 - 22:07
    to seduce us with an argument like:
  • 22:07 - 22:11
    “you have the right to be, but
  • 22:11 - 22:14
    in consistency with your history.
  • 22:14 - 22:17
    Do not forget who you’ve been”.
  • 22:17 - 22:20
    So, keeping consistency with
  • 22:20 - 22:23
    your past is being conditioned by
  • 22:23 - 22:26
    the pattern that subjected you.
  • 22:26 - 22:28
    Thus, it is a way for the pattern
  • 22:28 - 22:30
    to continue influencing us.
  • 22:30 - 22:33
    This would be a more refined or
  • 22:33 - 22:36
    perfected narrative of Libra’s structure.
  • 22:38 - 22:41
    If you'd like, we can listen now
  • 22:41 - 22:43
    to Libra’s Root Pain.
  • 22:45 - 22:47
    Let’s close our eyes and let's feel
  • 22:47 - 22:49
    if this resonates with you.
  • 22:49 - 22:53
    [LIBRA'S ROOT PAIN RECITE]
  • 24:36 - 24:40
    That's what hurts Libra.
  • 24:43 - 24:47
    To be what it is, regardless
  • 24:50 - 24:54
    of a pretended balance, perfection,
  • 24:54 - 24:56
    righteousness and duty.
  • 24:57 - 25:00
    When we grasp this, open ourselves
  • 25:00 - 25:04
    and embrace the willingness to
  • 25:04 - 25:09
    channel that which calls us from within
  • 25:09 - 25:13
    we can work in territories like
  • 25:13 - 25:16
    the ones I’m going to mention.
  • 25:16 - 25:19
    In what I call the purposes for a
  • 25:19 - 25:21
    conscious transformation towards
  • 25:21 - 25:23
    a virtuous expression.
  • 25:24 - 25:28
    The understanding of the sense of polarity.
  • 25:29 - 25:35
    The understanding that polarity
  • 25:35 - 25:38
    doesn’t necessarily mean exclusion
  • 25:38 - 25:40
    of something. I could integrate
  • 25:40 - 25:43
    the opposites or I could swing from one
  • 25:43 - 25:47
    to another without falling into self-denial.
  • 25:47 - 25:50
    This is complementation. It’s an
  • 25:51 - 25:54
    oscillation, an astrological opposition.
  • 25:54 - 25:57
    How do we integrate that? Well,
  • 25:57 - 26:00
    we could find a middle ground
  • 26:00 - 26:04
    between the two opposites, or
  • 26:04 - 26:07
    we could visit each side avoiding a
  • 26:07 - 26:09
    polarisation that constraints
  • 26:09 - 26:13
    the expression of the whole. In this way
  • 26:13 - 26:19
    I can address factors that require
  • 26:19 - 26:22
    my attention, without having to
  • 26:22 - 26:25
    suppress what I feel I must experience.
  • 26:25 - 26:30
    Finding balance is a work
  • 26:30 - 26:33
    related to Libra's transformation.
  • 26:33 - 26:35
    "Comprehend the impossibility
  • 26:35 - 26:37
    of harming others'.
  • 26:37 - 26:39
    I’ve already explained this.
  • 26:39 - 26:42
    We never cause harm when we are.
  • 26:43 - 26:45
    If I am being, according to my
  • 26:45 - 26:48
    conscience and my inner heartbeat,
  • 26:48 - 26:50
    why do you say that I hurt you?
  • 26:50 - 26:53
    The problem is that you don't accept
  • 26:53 - 26:55
    who I am. You want me to be
  • 26:55 - 26:56
    someone else for you.
  • 26:56 - 27:00
    That’s on you, not me. Do therapy.
  • 27:01 - 27:04
    To comprehend the non-existence of
  • 27:04 - 27:08
    ‘correct’ or ‘good’.
  • 27:12 - 27:14
    When the adjective doesn't nurture,
  • 27:14 - 27:17
    it kills.
  • 27:17 - 27:26
    Beyond the adjectives lie all the mandates
  • 27:26 - 27:29
    and demands that subjugate us.
  • 27:29 - 27:32
    What is ‘good '? What is ‘bad’?
  • 27:32 - 27:34
    What is ‘correct’ or ‘incorrect'?
  • 27:34 - 27:38
    Notice this when you explore the
  • 27:38 - 27:41
    triplicity. To what extent do you
  • 27:41 - 27:44
    repress yourselves, based on
  • 27:44 - 27:46
    an idea or judgement?
  • 27:46 - 27:50
    How often do we hinder our
  • 27:50 - 27:55
    natural and fluid expression based
  • 27:55 - 27:57
    on opinions?
  • 27:58 - 27:59
    What's ‘right’?
  • 28:01 - 28:02
    Why do I have to be like you?
  • 28:02 - 28:05
    Why should my feelings mirror yours?
  • 28:05 - 28:08
    Why must I shape my life after yours?
  • 28:08 - 28:10
    And why do we need to agree
  • 28:10 - 28:12
    on what a relationship is?
  • 28:12 - 28:14
    Why do I need to feel that
  • 28:14 - 28:17
    there’s only real connection
  • 28:17 - 28:20
    if we share the same projects?
  • 28:20 - 28:23
    We may not coincide,
  • 28:23 - 28:25
    that’s a different thing.
  • 28:25 - 28:27
    There may not be confluence
  • 28:27 - 28:29
    or capacity for complementarity
  • 28:29 - 28:32
    at a given moment. That is why
  • 28:32 - 28:35
    people break-up, why we leave
  • 28:35 - 28:37
    things or people behind.
  • 28:37 - 28:40
    But no one is wrong,
  • 28:40 - 28:42
    just being according to their
  • 28:42 - 28:44
    consciousness, to their prevailing
  • 28:44 - 28:47
    level of awareness. If we don’t dissolve
  • 28:47 - 28:51
    this automatic response, it will replace us.
  • 28:51 - 28:53
    As we said before. This ends up
  • 28:53 - 28:58
    replacing us by clouding our vision,
  • 28:58 - 29:01
    and clouding our expression.
  • 29:03 - 29:05
    "Coincide in a relationship
  • 29:05 - 29:07
    generating “separative agreements".
  • 29:07 - 29:10
    When we talk about Libra we need
  • 29:10 - 29:12
    to talk about this: Libras appear,
  • 29:12 - 29:14
    makes themselves present
  • 29:14 - 29:16
    -now I’m talking about a virtuous
  • 29:16 - 29:19
    expression, a transformation
  • 29:20 - 29:22
    of limitation into virtue-.
  • 29:24 - 29:25
    When Libras are trapped in the
  • 29:25 - 29:28
    need for moral perfection they avoid
  • 29:28 - 29:33
    conflict, imbalances, disharmonies.
  • 29:33 - 29:35
    So, in order to do this they are
  • 29:35 - 29:40
    absent, they yield, because
  • 29:40 - 29:43
    the only thing that matters is
  • 29:43 - 29:46
    to verify to themselves of
  • 29:46 - 29:50
    their correspondence to the norm.
  • 29:50 - 29:52
    Libra’s work involves understanding
  • 29:52 - 29:55
    that we can have complementary
  • 29:55 - 29:57
    relationships only if we affirm ourselves
  • 29:57 - 30:00
    in our personal power.
  • 30:00 - 30:02
    Only if we make ourselves present.
  • 30:02 - 30:05
    There can only be a meeting, a coincidence
  • 30:05 - 30:08
    if we are present in our right to be,
  • 30:08 - 30:10
    not in self-denial. That is why
  • 30:10 - 30:13
    I refer to it as ‘separative agreement’.
  • 30:13 - 30:16
    We will see that in Scorpio there’s
  • 30:16 - 30:20
    a fusion, a merging in contradiction,
  • 30:20 - 30:22
    a fusion with our opposite,
  • 30:22 - 30:25
    with what we reject, a fusion with
  • 30:25 - 30:27
    unseen aspects about ourselves,
  • 30:27 - 30:29
    a fusion with our projections onto others.
  • 30:29 - 30:32
    The task at hand is to sustain ourselves
  • 30:32 - 30:35
    in a loving vibration in that confusion.
  • 30:35 - 30:38
    It’d be something like: ‘I love what I reject ‘,
  • 30:38 - 30:40
    or ‘I sustain myself in love
  • 30:40 - 30:42
    beyond my own rejection’,
  • 30:42 - 30:44
    or ‘I understand that
  • 30:44 - 30:47
    what I reject in others resides within me’.
  • 30:47 - 30:50
    When there’s fusion, there’s
  • 30:52 - 30:56
    no room for separation.
  • 30:56 - 30:58
    So, for Scorpio,
  • 30:58 - 31:00
    in order to be able to merge with
  • 31:00 - 31:05
    it’s opposite, to coalesce in contradiction,
  • 31:05 - 31:07
    we have to make ourselves present
  • 31:07 - 31:10
    in the encounter, to stand strong
  • 31:10 - 31:11
    in that union.
  • 31:11 - 31:14
    If we are not willing to be present
  • 31:14 - 31:16
    in an encounter under the light
  • 31:16 - 31:19
    we will hardly be ready for a fusion
  • 31:19 - 31:23
    in the subconscious shadow territories.
  • 31:24 - 31:24
    So...
  • 31:24 - 31:28
    When Libras encounter others,
  • 31:28 - 31:30
    they aim for complementation
  • 31:30 - 31:34
    by affirming themselves. This creates
  • 31:34 - 31:38
    a confluence through self-affirmation.
  • 31:38 - 31:41
    This is linked to what we said before
  • 31:41 - 31:43
    about following our heartbeat and
  • 31:43 - 31:47
    standing in our right to express and be that.
  • 31:47 - 31:50
    ‘Breathe through the crossroads,
  • 31:50 - 31:52
    holding the feeling of confusion’.
  • 31:52 - 31:55
    This is also Libra’s work towards virtue.
  • 31:55 - 31:58
    We often make decisions without clarity
  • 31:58 - 32:01
    because we are not able of holding
  • 32:01 - 32:03
    ourselves in confusion. To hold
  • 32:03 - 32:05
    ourselves in that crossroads
  • 32:05 - 32:08
    -not like Libras do within the limitation,
  • 32:08 - 32:10
    to deny one's right but-
  • 32:10 - 32:14
    to discover one's own direction.
  • 32:15 - 32:18
    That is a virtuous expression of Libra.
  • 32:18 - 32:21
    To see the crossroads not as an excuse,
  • 32:21 - 32:24
    a detour, or a distraction from being.
  • 32:24 - 32:26
    But, as something
  • 32:26 - 32:28
    we navigate at a given moment,
  • 32:28 - 32:30
    neither better nor worse than
  • 32:30 - 32:32
    the seeming clarity.
  • 32:32 - 32:35
    Sometimes, we seem to be clear but
  • 32:35 - 32:38
    in truth we're not seeing things clearly.
  • 32:38 - 32:41
    Often, we hastily make decisions
  • 32:41 - 32:43
    just to move past the crossroads.
  • 32:43 - 32:46
    Consequently, such decisions are not
  • 32:46 - 32:48
    born out of clarity, rather from
  • 32:48 - 32:50
    evading the discomfort or confusion
  • 32:50 - 32:53
    that we prefer to avoid feeling.
  • 32:53 - 32:54
    There are times when we need to
  • 32:54 - 32:56
    endure confusion. Why do we think
  • 32:56 - 32:59
    badly of being confused? Of feeling
  • 32:59 - 33:01
    uncertainty? Why do we rush ourselves
  • 33:01 - 33:04
    to act resolutely when we feel confused?
  • 33:04 - 33:07
    When we feel disoriented about
  • 33:07 - 33:09
    what decisions to make?
  • 33:09 - 33:10
    Wouldn’t it be more
  • 33:10 - 33:14
    powerful to wait, to work, to commit
  • 33:14 - 33:16
    and get involved for
  • 33:16 - 33:19
    clarity to emerge?
  • 33:20 - 33:25
    Well, that is also Libra’s work.
  • 33:25 - 33:26
    And I add: ‘Be ready for
  • 33:26 - 33:28
    the shadow and the fusion’.
  • 33:28 - 33:31
    That is to say that in Libra we already
  • 33:31 - 33:33
    hear the call from Scorpio’s vibration,
  • 33:33 - 33:36
    which is the following zodiac sign.
  • 33:36 - 33:39
    When I show up, I stand strong
  • 33:39 - 33:42
    in this separative encounter. With
  • 33:42 - 33:44
    ‘separative’ I mean that we affirm
  • 33:44 - 33:47
    ourselves in front of others, not denying
  • 33:47 - 33:51
    our right to be for the need of an encounter
  • 33:51 - 33:54
    according to a preconceived idea of
  • 33:54 - 33:56
    beauty and balance that force us to
  • 33:56 - 34:00
    manufacture encounters at all costs.
  • 34:00 - 34:03
    Not that. From being fully present,
  • 34:03 - 34:06
    when I stand in front of you in my power,
  • 34:06 - 34:09
    in self-affirmation, trying to complement
  • 34:09 - 34:11
    myself in the confluence with you
  • 34:11 - 34:13
    as a powerful strong being,
  • 34:13 - 34:16
    only then we can unveil all aspects
  • 34:16 - 34:19
    of our nature.
  • 34:19 - 34:22
    To unveil confusion,
  • 34:22 - 34:30
    urges, hidden drives… our ugly side.
  • 34:31 - 34:35
    When I studied Bach flower therapy
  • 34:35 - 34:37
    at the Andalusian school, one of
  • 34:37 - 34:40
    my colleagues from Malaga
  • 34:40 - 34:43
    introduced me to a music band.
  • 34:43 - 34:46
    I always quote their lyrics as he used to.
  • 34:46 - 34:49
    It’s a band from Malaga called “Tabletom”,
  • 34:49 - 34:51
    and they have a song called
  • 34:51 - 34:56
    “The ugly side”. The ugly side is the shadow,
  • 34:57 - 35:00
    what supposedly isn't luminous, right?
  • 35:00 - 35:03
    This song’s lyrics, in addition to say
  • 35:03 - 35:07
    that “it was God’s habit to deify Himself”
  • 35:07 - 35:09
    it also says: “God is not just the
  • 35:09 - 35:12
    ear of grain and the passing minute,
  • 35:12 - 35:15
    the unpredictable history and its abysses.
  • 35:15 - 35:18
    God is also the blows, the addictions,
  • 35:18 - 35:20
    and the ugly side of ourselves.”
  • 35:21 - 35:25
    The plentiful fusion of Light and Shadow
  • 35:27 - 35:30
    is born, firstly, out of presence,
  • 35:30 - 35:32
    of feeling the right to be
  • 35:32 - 35:34
    what we feel we are.
  • 35:36 - 35:38
    And that requires for us to break free
  • 35:38 - 35:40
    from mandates of being something.
  • 35:40 - 35:44
    For starters, ‘Being’ is a dynamic process.
  • 35:44 - 35:48
    We are not always the same, unless
  • 35:48 - 35:51
    we insist on repeating ourselves
  • 35:51 - 35:54
    in that which provides us safety.
  • 35:54 - 35:56
    Here is another example that
  • 35:56 - 35:58
    I usually use to depict Leo:
  • 35:58 - 36:00
    when my mother says that she’s
  • 36:00 - 36:02
    always being the same, right?
  • 36:02 - 36:05
    I think I mentioned this when we
  • 36:05 - 36:06
    studied the fire triplicity.
  • 36:06 - 36:09
    “I haven’t changed” she says.
  • 36:09 - 36:11
    I have not changed.
  • 36:12 - 36:15
    Well... We are always changing, we
  • 36:15 - 36:17
    don’t always want the same things.
  • 36:17 - 36:20
    So, it doesn't make any sense for us to
  • 36:20 - 36:23
    constrain ourselves into a framework
  • 36:23 - 36:26
    that restricts and inhibits us, does it?
  • 36:26 - 36:30
    Breaking the pattern means being able
  • 36:30 - 36:33
    to engage with everything that unfolds
  • 36:33 - 36:36
    in alignment with who we are becoming.
  • 36:36 - 36:40
    Also related to Libra’s protagonism.
  • 36:40 - 36:44
    From there, we embody firmness.
  • 36:44 - 36:46
    And now is clear why firmness
  • 36:46 - 36:48
    is Libra’s virtue, isn't it?
  • 36:48 - 36:50
    Being firm is not being obstinate
  • 36:50 - 36:53
    or stubborn.
  • 36:53 - 36:55
    It’s the right to be
  • 36:55 - 36:57
    who I feel I am,
  • 36:57 - 37:01
    to live in authenticity and freedom.
  • 37:01 - 37:05
    Exercise of will and powerful protagonism.
  • 37:05 - 37:07
    Libra has to do with the other,
  • 37:07 - 37:10
    where I meet the other, and in that
  • 37:10 - 37:12
    meeting we have to be powerful.
  • 37:12 - 37:16
    We can’t have real relationships...
  • 37:17 - 37:19
    Words fall short...
  • 37:19 - 37:22
    Relationships can only thrive when
  • 37:22 - 37:25
    formed between empowered individuals.
  • 37:26 - 37:29
    When I talk about the power
  • 37:29 - 37:31
    I am not referring to that
  • 37:31 - 37:34
    masculine idea of ​​power:
  • 37:35 - 37:40
    of strength, status or power battles. Right?
  • 37:41 - 37:45
    No. I’m talking about dignity.
  • 37:45 - 37:47
    Being who we are. Aligned to
  • 37:47 - 37:50
    our essence, to our core.
  • 37:51 - 37:54
    This is firmness. From there we can
  • 37:54 - 37:57
    be ready to embrace and live
  • 37:57 - 37:59
    that which calls us.
  • 38:01 - 38:07
    Not to feel fearful of leaving things behind.
  • 38:09 - 38:11
    We are dynamic.
  • 38:11 - 38:14
    Change is the only constant.
  • 38:16 - 38:19
    Let go of the idea that we lose
  • 38:19 - 38:24
    something when we move forward.
  • 38:24 - 38:26
    Materialise by dissolving the idea
  • 38:26 - 38:29
    of perfection that obstructs.
  • 38:29 - 38:32
    Dissolving the pattern.
  • 38:32 - 38:35
    Not to take responsibility when others
  • 38:35 - 38:37
    feel they are being hurt.
  • 38:38 - 38:40
    This is Libra’s main excuse to stay
  • 38:40 - 38:44
    in the limitation: “you have to be good”,
  • 38:44 - 38:47
    “this is right/wrong”, “this is immoral,
  • 38:47 - 38:49
    you’ll hurt others”. These are
  • 38:49 - 38:52
    self-aggressive messages intended to
  • 38:52 - 38:55
    constrain our expression, to force us
  • 38:55 - 38:57
    to conform to social standards.
  • 38:58 - 39:00
    It’s not something imposed on us,
  • 39:00 - 39:02
    it's self-imposed.
  • 39:02 - 39:04
    Because it provides us
  • 39:04 - 39:06
    with identity and safety.
  • 39:06 - 39:08
    We know who we are. However if we
  • 39:08 - 39:11
    are not fitting into a pre-made frame,
  • 39:11 - 39:14
    but rather framing ourselves our own
  • 39:14 - 39:17
    painting, we might feel frightened.
  • 39:17 - 39:19
    We are the Universe’s palette.
  • 39:19 - 39:23
    That is frightening, but it gives us free range
  • 39:23 - 39:25
    for our own creative expression.
  • 39:25 - 39:28
    Instead of subscribing to established
  • 39:28 - 39:34
    norms in order to feel “on the right track”.
  • 39:35 - 39:36
    And here are
  • 39:38 - 39:41
    the 4 exploration instruments.
Title:
Parte II - Triplicidad de aire: Libra
Video Language:
Spanish
Duration:
39:42

English subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions