-
I am a capitalist,
-
and after a 30-year career in capitalism
-
spanning three dozen companies
-
generating tens of billions
of dollars in market value,
-
I'm not just in the top one percent,
I'm in the top .01 percent of all earners.
-
Today, I have come
to share the secrets of our success,
-
because rich capitalists like me
have never been richer.
-
So the question is, how do we do it?
-
How do we manage to grab
-
an ever-increasing share
of the economic pie every year?
-
Is it that rich people are smarter
than we were 30 years ago?
-
Is it that we're working harder
than we once did?
-
Are we taller, better looking?
-
Sadly, no.
-
It all comes down to just one thing:
-
economics.
-
Because, here's the dirty secret.
-
There was a time
in which the economics profession
-
worked in the public interest,
-
but in the neoliberal era,
-
today,
-
they work only for big corporations
-
and billionaires,
-
and that is creating
a little bit of a problem.
-
We could choose to enact economic policies
-
that raise taxes on the rich,
-
regulate powerful corporations,
or raise wages for workers.
-
We have done it before.
-
But neoliberal economists would warn
-
that all of these policies
would be a terrible mistake,
-
because raising taxes
always kills economic growth,
-
and any form of government regulation
-
is inefficient,
-
and raising wages always kills jobs.
-
Well, as a consequence of that thinking,
-
over the last 30 years, in the USA alone,
-
the top one percent has grown
21 trillion dollars richer
-
while the bottom 50 percent
have grown 900 billion dollars poorer,
-
a pattern of widening inequality
that has largely repeated itself
-
across the world.
-
And yet, as middle class families
struggle to get by
-
on wages that have not budged
in about 40 years,
-
neoliberal economists continue to warn
that the only reasonable response
-
to the painful dislocations
of austerity and globalization
-
is even more austerity and globalization.
-
So, what is a society to do?
-
Well, it's superclear to me
what we need to do.
-
We need a new economics.
-
So, economics has been described
as the dismal science,
-
and for good reason,
because as much as it is taught today,
-
it isn't a science at all,
-
in spite of all
of the dazzling mathematics.
-
In fact, a growing number
of academics and practitioners
-
have concluded that neoliberal
economic theory is dangerously wrong
-
and that today's growing crises
of rising inequality
-
and growing political instability
-
are the direct result
of decades of bad economic theory.
-
What we now know is that the economics
that made me so rich isn't just wrong,
-
it's backwards,
-
because it turns out
-
it isn't capital
that creates economic growth,
-
it's people;
-
and it isn't self-interest
that promotes the public good,
-
it's reciprocity;
-
and it isn't competition
that produces our prosperity,
-
it's cooperation.
-
What we can now see is that an economics
that is neither just nor inclusive
-
can never sustain the high levels
of social cooperation
-
necessary to enable
a modern society to thrive.
-
So where did we go wrong?
-
Well, it turns out
that it's become painfully obvious
-
that the fundamental assumptions
that undergird neoliberal economic theory
-
are just objectively false,
-
and so today first I want to take you
through some of those mistaken assumptions
-
and then after describe where the science
suggests prosperity actually comes from.
-
So neoliberal economic
assumption number one is
-
that the market is
an efficient equilibrium system,
-
which basically means that if one thing
in the economy, like wages, goes up,
-
another thing in the economy,
like jobs, must go down.
-
So for example, in Seattle, where I live,
-
when in 2014 we passed
our nation's first 15 dollar minimum wage,
-
the neoliberals freaked out
over their precious equilibrium.
-
"If you raise the price
of labor," they warned,
-
"businesses will purchase less of it.
-
Thousands of low-wage workers
will lose their jobs.
-
The restaurants will close."
-
Except ...
-
they didn't.
-
The unemployment rate fell dramatically.
-
The restaurant business in Seattle boomed.
-
Why?
-
Because there is no equilibrium.
-
Because raising wages
doesn't kill jobs, it creates them,
-
because, for instance,
-
when restaurant owners are suddenly
required to pay restaurant workers enough
-
so that now even they
can afford to eat in restaurants,
-
it doesn't shrink the restaurant business,
-
it grows it, obviously.
-
(Applause)
-
Thank you.
-
The second assumption is
-
that the price of something
is always equal to its value,
-
which basically means
that if you earn 50,000 dollars a year
-
and I earn 50 million dollars a year,
-
that's because I produce
a thousand times as much value as you.
-
Now,
-
it will not surprise you to learn
-
that this is a very comforting assumption
-
if you're a CEO paying yourself
50 million dollars a year
-
but paying your workers poverty wages.
-
But please, take it from somebody
who has run dozens of businesses:
-
this is nonsense.
-
People are not paid what they are worth.
-
They are paid what they have
the power to negotiate,
-
and wages' falling share of GDP
-
is not because workers
have become less productive
-
but because employers
have become more powerful.
-
And --
-
(Applause)
-
And by pretending that the giant imbalance
in power between capital and labor
-
doesn't exist,
-
neoliberal economic theory
became essentially
-
a protection racket for the rich.
-
The third assumption,
and by far the most pernicious,
-
is a behavioral model
-
that describes human beings
as something called "homo economicus,"
-
which basically means
that we are all perfectly selfish,
-
perfectly rational
and relentlessly self-maximizing.
-
But just ask yourselves,
-
is it plausible that every single time
for your entire life,
-
when you did something
nice for somebody else,
-
all you were doing
was maximizing your own utility?
-
Is it plausible that when a soldier jumps
on a grenade to defend fellow soldiers,
-
they're just promoting
their narrow self-interest?
-
If you think that's nuts,
-
contrary to any reasonable
moral intuition,
-
that's because it is,
-
and according to the latest science,
-
not true.
-
But it is this behavioral model
-
which is at the cold, cruel heart
of neoliberal economics,
-
and it is as morally corrosive
-
as it is scientifically wrong,
-
because if we accept at face value
-
that humans are fundamentally selfish
-
and then we look around the world
-
at all of the unambiguous
prosperity in it,
-
then it follows logically,
-
then it must be true by definition,
-
that billions of individual
acts of selfishness
-
magically transubstantiate
into prosperity and the common good.
-
If we humans are merely
selfish maximizers,
-
then selfishness
is the cause of our prosperity.
-
Under this economic logic,
-
greed is good,
-
widening inequality is efficient,
-
and the only purpose of the corporation
-
can be to enrich shareholders,
-
because to do otherwise
would be to slow economic growth
-
and harm the economy overall.
-
And it is this gospel of selfishness
-
which forms the ideological cornerstone
of neoliberal economics,
-
a way of thinking
which has produced economic policies
-
which have enabled me and my rich buddies
in the top one percent
-
to grab virtually all of the benefits
of growth over the last 40 years.
-
But,
-
if instead
-
we accept the latest empirical research,
-
real science, which correctly
describes human beings
-
as highly cooperative,
-
reciprocal
-
and intuitively moral creatures,
-
then it follows logically
-
that it must be cooperation
-
and not selfishness
-
that is the cause of our prosperity,
-
and it isn't our self-interest
-
but rather our inherent reciprocity
-
that is humanity's economic superpower.
-
So at the heart of this new economics
-
is a story about ourselves that grants us
permission to be our best selves,
-
and, unlike the old economics,
-
this is a story that is virtuous
-
and also has the virtue of being true.
-
Now,
-
I want to emphasize
that this new economics
-
is not something I have personally
imagined or invented.
-
Its theories and models
are being developed and refined
-
in universities around the world
-
building on some of the best
new research in economics,
-
complexity theory, evolutionary theory,
-
psychology, anthropology
and other disciplines.
-
And although this new economics
does not yet have its own textbook
-
or even a commonly agreed upon name,
-
in broad strokes
-
its explanation of where prosperity
comes from goes something like this.
-
So, market capitalism
is an evolutionary system
-
in which prosperity emerges
-
through a positive feedback loop
-
between increasing amounts of innovation
and increasing amounts of consumer demand.
-
Innovation is the process
by which we solve human problems,
-
consumer demand is the mechanism
through which the market selects
-
for useful innovations,
-
and as we solve more problems,
we become more prosperous.
-
But as we become more prosperous,
-
our problems and solutions
-
become more complex,
-
and this increasing technical complexity
-
requires ever higher levels
of social and economic cooperation
-
in order to produce
the more highly specialized products
-
that define a modern economy.
-
Now, the old economics
is correct, of course,
-
that competition plays a crucial role
in how markets work,
-
but what it fails to see
-
is that it is largely a competition
between highly cooperative groups --
-
competition between firms,
competition between networks of firms,
-
competition between nations --
-
and anyone who has ever run
a successful business knows
-
that building a cooperative team
by including the talents of everyone
-
is almost always a better strategy
than just a bunch of selfish jerks.
-
So how do we leave neoliberalism behind
-
and build a more sustainable,
more prosperous
-
and more equitable society?
-
The new economics suggests
just five rules of thumb.
-
First is that successful economies
are not jungles, they're gardens,
-
which is to say that markets,
-
like gardens, must be tended,
-
that the market is the greatest
social technology ever invented
-
for solving human problems,
-
but unconstrained by social norms
or democratic regulation,
-
markets inevitably create
more problems than they solve.
-
Climate change,
-
the great financial crisis of 2008
-
are two easy examples.
-
The second rule is
-
that inclusion creates economic growth.
-
So the neoliberal idea
-
that inclusion is this fancy luxury
-
to be afforded if and when we have growth
is both wrong and backwards.
-
The economy is people.
-
Including more people in more ways
-
is what causes economic growth
in market economies.
-
The third principle
-
is the purpose of the corporation
is not merely to enrich shareholders.
-
The greatest grift
in contemporary economic life
-
is the neoliberal idea that
the only purpose of the corporation
-
and the only responsibility of executives
-
is to enrich themselves and shareholders.
-
The new economics must and can insist
-
that the purpose of the corporation
-
is to improve the welfare
of all stakeholders:
-
customers, workers,
-
community and shareholders alike.
-
Rule four:
-
greed is not good.
-
Being rapacious
doesn't make you a capitalist,
-
it makes you a sociopath.
-
(Laughter)
-
(Applause)
-
And in an economy as dependent
upon cooperation at scale as ours,
-
sociopathy is as bad for business
as it is for society.
-
And fifth and finally,
-
unlike the laws of physics,
-
the laws of economics are a choice.
-
Now, neoliberal economic theory
-
has sold itself to you
as unchangeable natural law,
-
when in fact it's social norms
and constructed narratives
-
based on pseudoscience.
-
If we truly want a more equitable,
-
more prosperous
and more sustainable economy,
-
if we want high-functioning democracies
-
and civil society,
-
we must have a new economics.
-
And here's the good news:
-
if we want a new economics,
-
all we have to do is choose to have it.
-
Thank you.
-
(Applause)
-
Moderator: So Nick,
I'm sure you get this question a lot.
-
If you're so unhappy
with the economic system,
-
why not just give all your money away
and join the 99 percent?
-
Nick Hanauer: Yeah, no, yes, right.
-
You get that a lot. You get that a lot.
-
"If you care so much about taxes,
why don't you pay more,
-
and if you care so much about wages,
why don't you pay more?"
-
And I could do that.
-
The problem is,
-
it doesn't make that much difference,
-
and I have discovered a strategy
-
that works literally
a hundred thousand times better --
-
Moderator: OK.
-
NH: which is to use my money
to build narratives and to pass laws
-
that will require
all the other rich people
-
to pay taxes and pay their workers better.
-
(Applause)
-
And so, for example,
-
the 15-dollar minimum wage
that we cooked up
-
has now affected 30 million workers.
-
So that works better.
-
Moderator: That's great.
-
If you change your mind,
we'll find some takers for you.
-
NH: OK. Thank you.
Moderator: Thank you very much.