-
Music
-
Herald Angel: And now we come to the talk
entitled low-cost non-invasive biomedical
-
imaging. Current medical imaging has
problems: it is expensive, it is large,
-
rarely preventively used and maybe you've
heard of the story of a fMRI - this is the
-
magnet resonance tomography - they put in
a dead Salmon and they can get a signal
-
from brain activity from it. There's also
lots of problems in the software as well.
-
A little story, maybe you look it up. And
how this whole mess can be solved with the
-
technique called Open Electrical Impedance
Tomography - this will tell us Jean
-
Rintoul. Give a big round of applause for
Jean.
-
applause
Jean Rintoul: Thank you.
-
Hello everyone. Today I
-
will be talking about an open source route
for biomedical imaging using a technique
-
that's in R&D called Electrical Impedance
Tomography. Not many people have heard of
-
it, which is why it seems like it's
important to mention. First of all, I'll
-
just give you the vision of what it would
be like if everybody had access to cheap
-
biomedical imaging. Right now you only get
imaged when something's gone wrong. And,
-
moreover, you only actually get to use
these tools when something has gone wrong
-
in a first world country when you're lucky
enough to be close to a hospital and have
-
access to these technologies. That's a
very limited number of people. What's even
-
worse about it: is it's hard to hack! So,
if you wanted to improve this technology
-
yourself - medical physics is an amazing
field - but it would be very hard to do so
-
because you don't have a three million
dollar MRI scanner sitting in your garage.
-
Maybe you do, that's good for you, just
not many of us do. If we did have cheap
-
biomedical imaging we could do things like
do preventive scans so you would wake up
-
in the morning you'd like, take a shower,
the device would be quietly imaging your
-
body, would warn you if the slightest
little thing when went wrong. You'd do
-
machine learning over it, it'd be
wonderful wonderful for health care. So,
-
that's the vision of what biomedical
imaging could be. And the other point is
-
sometimes we move forward faster when we
share the information. I worked in defense
-
for a brief period and people didn't
really share information between each
-
other, and I think that inhibited science
from moving forward. So, sharing is
-
caring.
So today I'm going to go through a few
-
different things. I'm going to go through
the current biomedical imaging
-
technologies. I'll give you an
introduction to Electrical Impedance
-
Tomography. I'll go through the open
source Electrical Impedance Tomography
-
Project. Then I'll go through some
applications that we could apply it to.
-
And then I'll suggest a few different next
steps that we can go into because by no
-
means is it finished. Right now we have
four different main existing imaging
-
modalities. Your MRI scanner, which is a
wonderful tool, it's huge, very expensive.
-
The most commonly used imaging is actually
CAT scanner which sends our x-rays through
-
your body which is ionizing radiation,
which is bad for you because it causes
-
cancer in the long run if you get too many
of those scans and it's actually the first
-
first scan that you'll get when you go
into the emergency room. It's the most
-
commonly used. And as we all know we've
got those grainy images that come from the
-
ultrasound of fetuses, wonderful tool
except for the scattering due to the sound
-
gets scattered when you have different
density materials next to each other. And
-
not exactly an imaging modality but a very
important diagnostic technique is EEG.
-
So you might ask, how do we classify these
right now? we have 3 main types of
-
resolution. Spatial, contrast, and time.
Spatial resolution is, basically, what
-
space you can determine 2 different
objects from each other. Contrast
-
resolution is soft tissue or subtle
differences in tissues. And time
-
resolution, as it sounds, is how things
change over time and how quickly you can
-
do these images together. Your CAT scan,
your basic machine in a hospital,
-
costs 1 to 2.5 million dollars.
You probably didn't get one for Christmas
-
to play around with. Oh well. It's also
got this ionizing radiation, you've got
-
a lot of maintenance, and
dedicated technicians.
-
An MRI, say, your average 3 Tesla magnet
-
with its own helium quenching chamber
no less, as well as dedicated technicians
-
and experts who can actually read
the images. Again $3,000,000. An amazing
-
and beautiful technology, but really
expensive. Amazing spatial resolution, the
-
best. When it does something at this very
high spatial resolution, it actually takes
-
4 minutes and 16 seconds. Which is a
really long time to take to do this
-
wonderful spatial resolution image.
Ultrasound, it's a bit grainy due to
-
scattering. On average it costs about
1$115k, not too bad. It's a pretty minimal
-
health risk. EEG. EEG doesn't do any image
reconstruction. In fact it does very
-
little in many ways. But it is still very
useful. Your average medical grade by EEG
-
system is $40k. You might also know of
some open source EEG projects which are
-
pretty cool. So just a note on the
radiation of CAT-scans. It's actually the
-
biggest contributing cause of radiation in
the United States. So here I just put
-
those biomedical imaging modalities onto a
graph so that you can kind of think of
-
them in terms of spatial resolution and
time resolution, and where they fall in
-
the picture of common things that go wrong
with people. Like, X-rays or CAT scans are
-
great for for looking at bone and bone
breaks; pulmonary edema, that's water on
-
the lung ,tuberculosis, huge in third-
world countries, massive problem. You
-
don't actually need super high spatial
resolution to be able to detect it. And
-
it's important to sort of understand what
you can do at different spatial and time
-
resolutions. Under like, the optimal goal
of all of this, I put non-invasive
-
electrophysiology. What that is, is high
spatial resolution and high time
-
resolution. That's where you can measure
ion activation, or basically what cells
-
are doing when they communicate with each
other, which is right now only done in an
-
invasive manner.
Today I'm gonna talk about this new
-
technique called Electrical Impedance
Tomography and describe where it will fit
-
in amongst what already exists. So what is
it. Okay yeah basically you send AC
-
currents through the body, say a 50
kilohertz current. And that will take
-
different routes based on what tissue
there is. So it might go around some cells
-
and straight through others. And that's
really important because differentiating,
-
say, fat from muscle is one thing that you
could do. But you can go further and
-
differentiate, say, tumors from healthy
tissue. Because tumors have different
-
impedance spectra to the healthy tissue.
So as you can see, that would be very
-
useful to do. This set up here is a called
a phantom. What it is, it's like a
-
simulated human body. You get some
saltwater - the body is 80% water as you
-
might know -you get some meat or
vegetables. You put it inside and then you
-
use that to image. So we have current
flowing through all these different
-
directions and we recreate an image. Right
now it's used for lung volume
-
measurements. This is a baby with an EIT
setup. Muscle and fat mass, there's a
-
paper on gestural recognition that just
came out this year, you can look at
-
bladder and stomach fullness. There's some
research papers on breast and kidney
-
cancer detection. There's another research
paper on hemorrhage detection for stroke.
-
You can also look at the ... there's more
R&D on the depth of anesthesia in in
-
surgery as well, which would be another
interesting use for it. So all of these
-
are sort of in the works and you might
ask, "Great, that sounds amazing, why
-
isn't everybody using it already?" Well
yeah it's really an R&D technique right
-
now and it has a big problem: its spatial
resolution seems pretty limited. So it's
-
limited by the number of electrodes. But I
will discuss some potential ways to get
-
around that. As we go, it might not ever
get to the spatial resolution of MRI.
-
But maybe we don't need it to to be
useful. Because it's so compact. It's so
-
cheap, nothing about it is expensive. It's
got better source localization than EEG.
-
It does not ionize,
it's not harmful to human tissue. It's
-
also got great time resolution, so it has
advantages and disadvantages. I'll just
-
remind you of what the first MRI scan
looked like at this point in time. As you
-
can see it looks pretty crappy in 1977.
And now it looks pretty awesome. That's a
-
slice of my head by the way in a 3 Tesla
MRI scanner. This is what early EIT looks
-
like. That's with 16 electrodes only. What
will it look like in a few years time I
-
don't know. I hope that MRI gives you a
pathway that it will take take too.
-
Now I'll introduce you to the OpenEIT
project. The OpenEIT project is obviously
-
open source. It has a PCB design done in
Eagle CAD. It has firmware written in C.
-
It has a Python dashboard that lets you
see the reconstruction in real time. It
-
also has a reconstruction algorithm which
I'll go into. And you can get it from
-
github right there. So how does it
reconstruct an image? OpenEIT right now
-
has 8 electrodes and what you do is, you
send this 50 kHz current through every
-
combination of those 8 electrodes and you
get a different impedance value for each
-
of those measurements. On the left you can
see basically what you're doing. You know where the
-
electrodes are positioned and you get one
value going horizontally. You add it to
-
another value coming from another
direction. And again, you can sort of see
-
it's getting a low resolution image as it
goes around adding those values together.
-
If you use many, many views you bring the
image back. This is the radon transform,
-
that's what it's called, and you
basically just send lots of current
-
through these different slightly different
angles and you build up something called a
-
sinogram which is over there. And then you
invert it to get the image back. I used
-
OpenCV which is a really common image
processing library to do this. You can
-
just do it with a regular image yourself
and try it out. But what I did is exactly
-
the same as what you do with a regular
image, except I use current to be the
-
input data. So this is the PCB design
in Eagle. Basically it has a
-
few different features. A connector for
your 8 electrodes. It's running an ARM
-
Cortex M3, which is quite nice. It has a
dedicated DFT engine for doing your direct
-
Fourier transform in real, time which is
also quite nice. A JTAG debugger to easily
-
reprogram it. It's got coin cell or
external battery options. It has UART to
-
get the serial data off. And you can also
flip it to Bluetooth mode and get the data
-
off by Bluetooth if you felt like going
Wireless.
-
At this point you might be asking "Is this
safe for me to play around with?", which
-
is a really great question because the
answer is actually "Yeah! it is". There's
-
some guidelines called the IEC60601-1
guidelines for safer use in humans. And
-
basically which says it should be, and
openEIT is less than 10 micro amps which
-
is great because that's well within their
guidelines. If you want to compare it to
-
other things that are completely legal,
say I don't know if you've seen there's
-
like late-night TV ads for those abs
stimulators that stimulate your muscles,
-
there are about 15 to 20 milliamps just
for reference and as a scale to look at
-
the 10 micro amps. So some of you might
have used them already and that's hugely
-
more current than what we're putting
through to image the body here. This is
-
what the dashboard looks like. It does the
reconstruction. You can connect to serial
-
at baseline. You can obviously adjust
sliders to look at the area that you want
-
to look at. You can read from a file and
fiddle around however you would like to.
-
This is what it looks like when you
reconstruct something. I have a phantom up
-
there which is a part of water with a cup
in it. I moved the cup around anti-
-
clockwise so you can see in each of the
pictures I move it around a little bit
-
more. And you can see the reconstruction
there with me moving the cup around again.
-
This might not be wow-ing you with the
resolution, with only 8 electrodes. It's a
-
proof of concept but that's okay. Let's
see if we can make this I make this go.
-
Here's a real-time video demonstration of
it. Here's me with a shot glass. I'm
-
moving around anti-clockwise. Hopefully
you can see on the left the image being
-
reconstructed in real time. And there we
go, move to the bottom. You can see it
-
over there and again up to the top. you
can see it over there. So that's a basic
-
proof of principle version of it running.
-
So the first MRI scan of human
lungs wasn't that amazing.
-
Early EIT scan wasn't either.
-
applause
Something else that you can use it
-
that for is differentiating objects.
Multi-frequency. This is what they're
-
doing the breast cancer and kidney cancer
scans on. Basically you send different
-
frequencies through these times, called
multi-frequency Electrical Impedance
-
Tomography and you build up a spectrum.
Here I've got an apple, a pear oh no a
-
sweet potato and and some water. And I've
sent through these different frequencies
-
and I get these different spectrums.
They're different, you can see that
-
they're different. They're quite obviously
different but yeah you can also just
-
simply classify. And on the left you can
see where the water is, the apple is, the
-
sweet potato is. Or, the sweet potato and
the apple a little bit harder that one.
-
But that's basically what you do when you
detect cancer. So that's what I did. But
-
maybe we should look at the other papers
and see what they did because they did
-
better than me. So there's this guy called
Aristovich, 2014 he published spatial and
-
temporal resolution, and using this
technique 200 micro meters less than 2
-
milliseconds which covers most of the
applications that I listed on that graph
-
at the start of the talk. The downside
here is that it was an intracranial array,
-
so it was under the skull. So very dense
electrodes, a lot more electrodes. I only
-
used 8 he used like 256 so you can see
that it can be, like, the potential is
-
there.
So how should we use it first? what's a
-
nice low hanging through fruit? What about
medical imaging in the developing world
-
where I believe 4 billion people don't
have access to medical imaging. No MRI, no
-
CAT scans. Why is the EIT good for that?
It's cheap to mass-produce, super
-
portable, super low power. So that would
be a great place to start. What could we
-
do first? I'm going to go back to this
image again and have a look. Tuberculosis
-
affects a lot of people in the developing
world and you don't need amazing spatial
-
resolution to detect it. That would be a
good one. Or what about a pulmonary edema?
-
Pulmonary edema is water on the lung. It's
actually already used for that. You can
-
quite easily see the different volume
present, or the different conductivity
-
maps it's called, of a working lung and a
not so working lung right there.
-
Next steps. So what should we do to make
this technique better? What should we do
-
for OpenEIT to make it better? If you want
to innovate again, that's the github
-
project. Just go ahead. Oh that's an
avocado, it has a seat in the middle. Who
-
knew? I do. So I see the two main routes forward
as: One would be this low-cost biomedical
-
imaging for the developing world. You
could just stick with the static imaging
-
reconstruction because why not. you'd need
a few more electrodes than it currently
-
has. One of the main problems with the
technique is how you stick it to the skin.
-
So my suggestion for that is why don't you
just use a water bath and stick the body
-
part of interest in a body of water,
because water gets rid of a lot of the,
-
it's called the contact impedance problem.
Or, on the kind of exciting science front,
-
you've got the advancing neuroscience
option. Which would be measuring both high
-
spatial resolution and high time
resolution. So that's the non-invasive
-
electrophysiology solution. Or, and that
would be super awesome, there's a couple
-
of ways forward to do that and I'm going
to sort of discuss each of those.
-
So roughly there's physical configuration
improvements that could be done. There's
-
things that you can do to improve the
spatial resolution. There's things you can
-
do to improve the time resolution. And
this is interesting tack on at the end
-
that I thought I'd mentioned, which is
'write' functionality. So we're using very
-
small currents to read an image. What if
we pumped the current up a little before
-
you know it you're writing. I think not
invasive deep brain stimulation in a
-
focused way, that would be very very cool.
So, contact impedance. Major problem right
-
now, there is a well-known solution I
haven't done it yet you do this thing
-
called differential referencing, common
mode rejection should be done I haven't
-
done it that's the next step. That means
that it will work when you just attach it
-
with electrodes on the body. What happens
is, electrodes have a like some
-
capacitance and different amounts which
kind of interfere with the the measurement
-
that you want to make which you want to be
very accurate and just of your body. You
-
don't want to include the electrode
information in there that's changing.
-
There's a way to remove that that's well
known already. Another physical
-
configuration improvements: just increase
the number of electrodes. Wonderful, now
-
you've just improved the resolution. Or
the placing the part in water. Another set
-
of next steps would be on the mathematical
side. I mentioned that I use linear back
-
projection which is a wonderful technique,
that's how they do CAT scans. With X-rays
-
that's exactly what they do.
However, it makes some appalling
-
assumptions, like parent moves and
straight lines. That is not true. What you
-
should do is get a finite element model
and solve Maxwell's equations because
-
current bends around objects. Actually it
works in three dimensions too which might
-
not be all that surprising but it needs to
be solved for those three dimensions which
-
is why you just need to solve
Maxwell's equations and
-
create a finite element model.
And there's a quite a bit of work on
-
mathematical solutions that get higher
resolution.
-
That's another improvement area. And now
as I mentioned this awesome new technique.
-
Which, actualy there's a paper on
this year called
-
magneto-acoustic electical tomography.
You might remember
-
the FBI rule from high school.
When you have a current flowing,
-
perpendicular to that there will be a
force. Now that force, say it's vibrating
-
with 50 kilohertz. that's the AC signal
that you're sending through. Now you have
-
a vibrating compression wave. That's
sound. You can pick that up with a little
-
piezoelectric element. And that's actually
a focus of work. From that you can get
-
really good edge information, because as I
mentioned earlier, sound scatters at
-
edges. So you would also get the
electrical impedance tomography
-
information for the tissue sensitivity.
Why not combine those results together and
-
you would have a better tool. It currently
gets lesser resolution in the middle
-
simply from how you every combination of
electrodes just ends up having a less
-
dense number in the middle. You can also
do something as simple as increasing the
-
power that you send through if you're game
to do that. This is a kind of gory
-
picture. Right now epileptics, if they're
really troubled by their problem, which
-
they are often, they go into a hospital
have their brains opened up and they
-
stick this array on their head through
their skull. And they leave it open
-
for a week. And they try to induce
seizures through sleep deprivation.
-
And then they measure the activation
potentials that way to locate the foci or
-
where they going to do surgery to stop you
from having seizures. But it would be much
-
better and nicer if you could do it not
invasively and you probably can if you
-
improve the time resolution of EIT.
there's nothing stopping you from doing
-
that by the way. You just have to, like,
it's just a next step really.
-
And then I'll also mention write-
functionality. So there was a paper that
-
came out halfway through this year by a
guy called Neil Grossman (?) and what he
-
did is, he showed that you can stimulate
neurons by sending current through the
-
skull and in a focused way. Now why that's
interesting is, you can non-invasively
-
stimulate neurons. So that's the write-
functionality. It's unknown what
-
resolution is or how well you could
control the the focal point here. But it
-
works in the principle of beat frequencies
so he sent through two kilohertz and 2.05
-
kilohertz and basically had a beat
frequency of 10 Hertz arise from that and
-
basically stimulated neurons in this area
that he can control via an x- and y-axis
-
which is very impressive. Leaves a lot of
questions open. Those are some possible
-
next steps that it could go in. Obviously
I think this is interesting. I hope that
-
you do too. I'd love it if you would want
to sign up to a mailing list I'll give a
-
link on the next page. If you want to
collaborate email me. If you know any
-
funding bodies that might be interested in
the developing medical imaging for
-
the third world I'd love to be put in
contact. If you wanted a kit and, if there
-
were enough people that wanted a kit,
probably of the next version which would
-
have 32 electrodes sign up to the mailing
list, talk to me. Thanks.
-
applause
Rintoul: Thank you
-
applause Herald Angel: Thank you
very much. We have a little bit
-
time for Q&A. And please if you have to
leave the room make it in a very quiet
-
way. So is there ... there are some
questions I've seen microphone 4 first.
-
Please go ahead.
Audience member: So, a great thing
-
thinking about developing countries and
getting them medical tech. But at the very
-
first beginning you said imagine a world
where this imaging would be all available
-
like every day and it creeped me out a
little bit. Do you really think that it's
-
a good idea to go in the shower in the
morning and have your I don't know your
-
bathtub telling you that there is a small
mass inside your lungs.
-
Rintoul: That's a good question. Basically
the question was: There's a privacy
-
concern with looking inside your body. It
doesn't sound that great to some people.
-
To those people I would say you should
turn off I know that sounds a little
-
harsh. But please just turn it off, don't
use it. And with all scientific movements
-
forward comes great risk, I also say. And
it can be used for good or evil and it's
-
up to us as a society how we want to
choose to use it. And how we structure
-
ourselves and potentially motivate and
incentivize corporations to use it in a
-
responsible way. Part of making this open
is I hope that, basically if people have
-
access to it you can choose for yourself
how you'd want to use it.
-
Herald Angel: And next question would be
from the Signal Angel please.
-
Signal Angel: Yes I have a couple of
questions from the internet. First of all,
-
what type of AC frequencies in use? the
asker assumes sinusoidal but he wonders if
-
you also tried square wave, triangular and
other shapes.
-
Rintoul: That's also a really interesting
question. It's about what kinds of waves
-
are used, what kinds of AC signals.
Typically it's done with AC sine waves
-
ranging all over the place, depending on
what application you want to use up for. I
-
mentioned multi frequency EIT for cancer
detection. That uses a lot of different
-
frequencies so if you wanted to use other
waveforms I think that would be really
-
interesting. Nobody's tried, you can, that
should be done.
-
Herald: So since there's a big queue on
microphone 3 I would go there please.
-
Audience member: Yes I have a technical
question. Assuming that you won't use this
-
techniques on humans or organic matter at
all and what are the limitations for the
-
resolution. The spatial resolution. And is
there a possibility to reduce the spatial
-
resolution.
Rintoul: You mean increase the spatial
-
resolution or reduce it?
Audience member: Reduce the voxel size
-
Rintoul: So increase the spatial
resolution. Yes absolutely. So I was
-
trying to go through a few of the next
steps that could get to that. One of them
-
is magneto-acousto electrical tomography
because you get two different types of
-
information which you could put together
to form a higher resolution image. So
-
that's one way and if you didn't need to
worry about human safety I recommend you
-
just turn the power up, that will also
work.
-
Herald: Okay I think we go back to the
signal angel for one short one please.
-
Signal Angel: Yes I have another question
from the internet. from a doctor this
-
time. He wonders if there are any clinical
studies that compare pulmonary edema
-
diagnostics with EIT to ultrasound and why
don't we just work on cheap ultrasound
-
instead.
Rintoul: That's a good question. People
-
are working on cheap ultrasounds.
Ultrasound gives different information to
-
EIT. It has a problem of the sound
scattering. So it's a different type of
-
information which has different pros and
cons. And and I think people should make
-
cheap ultrasound. And I would like to see
the hybrid modality come together. You can
-
get really good tissue distinction with
EIT so there's pros and cons.
-
Herald: Okay then, microphone 2 please.
Audience member: You had a really good
-
talk my question so far you always need
direct contact to the electrode, right? So
-
it has to be direct contact or in water.
Is there way to detect or measure the
-
signal without direct contact? So maybe in
if the if the object is in air or any
-
other gas?
Rintoul: Right. I wish there was. No is
-
the short answer. Unless ...
Audience member: Any research on making it
-
happen?
Rintoul: Well yeah you can you can use
-
X-rays. They work wonderfully to to go
through the air. But if you use them I
-
mean you do increase your chance of cancer
so don't use them all the time on
-
yourself. Again CAT scanners are a little
bit expensive.
-
Herald: Thank you and I think we have time
for one more from microphone 3
-
Audience member: My question would be
what, so maybe I've missed it, but what's
-
the order of magnitude for cost so would
this be feasible at like a hackerspace for
-
this to implement. And does the industry
see the possibility to make money.
-
Rintoul: Yes a lot of those sort of these
early like R&D papers yeah they should be
-
applied and you could make money with it
absolutely. And there's no component in
-
there that costs more than a couple of
cents. I suppose a cortex m3 like costs a
-
couple of dollars. And I mean I don't know
what your budget is but yes you I think
-
you could do this in a hackerspace without
any problems. There's nothing stopping
-
anyone from doing this and as we know
microcontrollers are becoming cheaper and
-
cheaper. So why not.
Herald: I don't get Hasty's signs from the
-
sideline so I think I can take another
question from 2 please.
-
Audience member: So far you have showed us
images of 2d planes. What about volumes
-
Rintoul: Yes so there's work on solving
for volumes using finite element models
-
and solving Maxwell's equations. Basically
I just did the shortest route to reach
-
image reconstruction that was available
which was linear back projection which is
-
typically done in a 2d plane. So
absolutely, you can do it in three
-
dimensions.
Herald: So I'm very sorry we are out of
-
time the queue back there you can have the
chance to chat with our speaker just right
-
now. The next talk coming up is in about
15 minutes and it's I think also in
-
English. See you then and a big round of
applause for our speaker, excuse me.
-
applause
-
music
-
subtitles created by c3subtitles.de
in the year 2017. Join, and help us!