-
Not Synced
Today on The Big Questions,
-
Not Synced
Should we be proud of the British Empire?
-
Not Synced
Good Morning
-
Not Synced
I am Nikki Campbell.
-
Not Synced
Welcome to The Big Questions today!
-
Not Synced
We are at the Oasis Academy Media City UK,
in Salford
-
Not Synced
to debate one very big question.
-
Not Synced
Should we be proud of the British Empire?
-
Not Synced
Welcome everybody to The Big Questions.
-
Not Synced
Well, the British Empire once covered
13 million square miles
-
Not Synced
and held sway over 458 million people.
-
Not Synced
It was the largest empire in history.
-
Not Synced
The extent of its territories across
all the continents colored the maps pink
-
Not Synced
and created an empire on which
the sun truly never set
-
Not Synced
but across the 20th century
its power waned
-
Not Synced
most of its nearest
neighbour island fought
-
Not Synced
and won the right to self-rule in 1922.
-
Not Synced
The imperial jewel in the crown.
-
Not Synced
India and Pakistan gained
independence in 1947.
-
Not Synced
Britain's new impotence was evident
over sewers in 1956
-
Not Synced
and then country after country
-
Not Synced
in Africa, the Caribbean and the far east
-
Not Synced
went their own way.
-
Not Synced
All it's left
-
Not Synced
is the British commonwealth
-
Not Synced
plus a few wind swept outposts
-
Not Synced
and tax havens.
-
Not Synced
Looking back now, was the British Empire
-
Not Synced
something to swell our chests with pride
-
Not Synced
or something to be deeply ashamed of ?
-
Not Synced
Well, we've gathered together
-
Not Synced
entrepreneurs, historians, faith leaders
commentators and activists
-
Not Synced
from across the commonwealth
to debate that question
-
Not Synced
and you can join in too on
Twitter or online
-
Not Synced
by logging on to bbc.co.uk/thebigquestions
-
Not Synced
Big Questions!
-
Not Synced
and following the link
to the online discussion
-
Not Synced
plus there will be lots of encouragement
and contributions
-
Not Synced
from our very lively and
intelligent Salford audience.
-
Not Synced
Should we be proud of the British Empire?
-
Not Synced
Good morning everybody.
-
Not Synced
Charles Allen, historian and writer,
-
Not Synced
Lord Curzon, viceroy of India
for it was he said,
-
Not Synced
"The empire was a supreme force
for good in the world."
-
Not Synced
Yes he says "it was the greatest
institution in the world has ever seen:
-
Not Synced
he said, "to me the message is
-
Not Synced
hew in rock and hew in stone,
our work is righteous and it shall endure"
-
Not Synced
and of course because it didn't endure
-
Not Synced
and really the question is
was it righteous ?
-
Not Synced
Was it righteous ?
-
Not Synced
I think we we have to say
this is like the 'curate's egg'
-
Not Synced
it's good in parts.
-
Not Synced
But I also think we need to clarify
there are two definite models here
-
Not Synced
and going back
to the Greeks and the Romans,
-
Not Synced
the Greeks concept of imperialism
was the colony.
-
Not Synced
Your little island is not big enough so
you had to find somewhere else to live.
-
Not Synced
So you move, settle and
become independent.
-
Not Synced
The other model, of course
this is the one that really
-
Not Synced
I suspect is what upsets us
-
Not Synced
is the other model like Rome
where you become extremely predatory.
-
Not Synced
You attack the Sabines and
you take their women,
-
Not Synced
you attack the Etruscans and
you gradually expand
-
Not Synced
and eventually you end up
exploiting a weaker nation
-
Not Synced
and then you
-
Not Synced
Which model were we ?
-
Not Synced
We are a mix of both precisely.
-
Not Synced
We have got places like
Canada and Australia
-
Not Synced
and indeed America I suppose you could say
-
Not Synced
where in a sense the local population
was not big enough to resist.
-
Not Synced
But look, you mentioned Australia
-
Not Synced
Look at the the genocide
of the Tasmanian people.
-
Not Synced
What we did to the Aboriginals and Maoris
-
Not Synced
and look at the atrocities
-
Not Synced
do they not outweigh any good
that may have come from
-
Not Synced
I mean look I mean
it's a hall of shame, Charles.
-
Not Synced
The Bengal famine 1769-73 under the aegis
-
Not Synced
of the East India Company that
10 million people died
-
Not Synced
because of willful incompetence.
-
Not Synced
Massacres that Amritsar and
-
Not Synced
I mean atrocities in Kenya
relatively recently
-
Not Synced
how can we be in any way proud ?
-
Not Synced
I think by today's standards we cannot!
-
Not Synced
Today's standards!
-
Not Synced
But nevertheless what we have to do
when we actually look at it
-
Not Synced
particularly me as a historian
-
Not Synced
we have to set in some kind of context
-
Not Synced
Yeah
-
Not Synced
and if we talk about British-India
we have to say
-
Not Synced
what was that before the British came
-
Not Synced
what was in other parts of the world
when the British were there
-
Not Synced
and what legacy did they leave
-
Not Synced
and really it's there that we can pick out
-
Not Synced
what to me are straws because my family
they deeply involved in British India.
-
Not Synced
My father was one of the last
of the civil service to rule over India.
-
Not Synced
I actually I am a
child of the empire.
-
Not Synced
I saw it in action
-
Not Synced
and I saw in a sense the best to it
-
Not Synced
because here I saw one man
-
Not Synced
my memories of him are very strong
-
Not Synced
sitting on the veranda
-
Not Synced
as it were dispensing justice
-
Not Synced
paternalistic
-
Not Synced
you called might call it
dictotorial,
-
Not Synced
impartial justice
-
Not Synced
on a model that seemed to work very well.
-
Not Synced
But as i said,
that is the good aspect
-
Not Synced
but of course there are other aspects too.
-
Not Synced
There are, and we shall explore
-
Not Synced
at both sides of the imperial coin
-
Not Synced
as we proceed.
-
Not Synced
Dr. Anita Ghosh it's interesting
-
Not Synced
and what Charles says there is interesting
-
Not Synced
it's all about the context
-
Not Synced
and perhaps, we are rather value-led,
-
Not Synced
when we look at the past,
-
Not Synced
and value-led history
is bad history.
-
Not Synced
There were atrocities
-
Not Synced
there were appalling things.
-
Not Synced
What were the good things ?
-
Not Synced
Well, the good things were also there
-
Not Synced
and like Charles I agree it is,
it's hard to do draw any line there.
-
Not Synced
We are we are we are organized
in the form of a debate today
-
Not Synced
so we are encouraged to take sides.
-
Not Synced
No, listen, listen,
-
Not Synced
You can agree with each other that's fine.
-
Not Synced
We're looking for a genuine enlightenment.
-
Not Synced
But in terms of the good things
-
Not Synced
I think the infrastructure
that was left behind
-
Not Synced
by the British in India
-
Not Synced
which were built for reasons
of exploitation,
-
Not Synced
for reasons of extraction of resources.
-
Not Synced
No altruism.
-
Not Synced
No altruism there whatsoever.
-
Not Synced
One of the byproducts I think
is the infrastructure
-
Not Synced
that was left behind of the empire
-
Not Synced
which you could say gave India
an added benefit in 1947
-
Not Synced
which propelled us into the modern age
-
Not Synced
but I see that as a byproduct of empire.
-
Not Synced
It is as if it was put in place there
for the good of the people.
-
Not Synced
I mean the railways for instance
which are very often cited
-
Not Synced
as one of the best things
that the British left behind
-
Not Synced
they were there for the
extraction of resources.
-
Not Synced
If you look at the way the railways
were planned in the 19th century
-
Not Synced
they were directly connecting
the ports to the hinterlands
-
Not Synced
that was the sole purpose.
-
Not Synced
They were not connecting cities,
they were not connecting towns
-
Not Synced
they were not connecting people
to pilgrimage centres
-
Not Synced
where people would have loved to go to
-
Not Synced
but they were built in a
strategic way
-
Not Synced
functioning as arteries of extraction.
-
Not Synced
When you look back as
-
Not Synced
And exploitation
-
Not Synced
Yes, and exploitation
-
Not Synced
When you look back as a
British Indian are you angry ?
-
Not Synced
Yes, I am.
-
Not Synced
What you most angry about ?
-
Not Synced
The way empire functioned,
-
Not Synced
the way it was set up
-
Not Synced
it was a hugely unequal power structure.
-
Not Synced
A sovereign state went in to invade
another sovereign state
-
Not Synced
by virtue of its military might
-
Not Synced
by virtue of its economic power
-
Not Synced
and that fundamentally was unfair
-
Not Synced
and everything else that
emerges out of that
-
Not Synced
is a direct a result of that process.
-
Not Synced
So at the at the moment,
-
Not Synced
the moment at which
historians have
-
Not Synced
as I am sure some
of my colleagues would know
-
Not Synced
historians have called this
the absent-minded empire.
-
Not Synced
It was not an absent-minded empire.
-
Not Synced
People went in knowing what they wanted.
-
Not Synced
It was it was very well structured,
-
Not Synced
very well organized
-
Not Synced
otherwise how could a handful of people
-
Not Synced
from millions of miles away
-
Not Synced
construct such an effective system
-
Not Synced
which was the British empire in India ?
-
Not Synced
David Vance what are you proud of ?
-
Not Synced
Well, I am proud of the British empire
-
Not Synced
and I think just if you look at it
-
Not Synced
in the general context of in 1897
-
Not Synced
I think the year of queen
Victoria's silver jubilee.
-
Not Synced
Britain controlled about
25 percent of the world.
-
Not Synced
What a remarkable achievement
for these little islands!
-
Not Synced
And the fact is that were this
an audience of Italians
-
Not Synced
celebrating the Roman empire
-
Not Synced
or an audience of Spanish.
-
Not Synced
They would be proud of their empire
-
Not Synced
but we are not supposed to be.
-
Not Synced
I think, is there anything
you are ashamed of ?
-
Not Synced
From a 2016 perspective lots!
-
Not Synced
But you just said Nicky that
-
Not Synced
if you're going to have revisionist
history that's very bad history.
-
Not Synced
At the time in the moment
-
Not Synced
the British empire achieved lots of good
-
Not Synced
and it leaves legacies
which bring lots of good
-
Not Synced
and that needs to be said loud and clear.
-
Not Synced
The revisionist argument trying to
apply our standards in 2016
-
Not Synced
to things that happened
hundreds of years ago
-
Not Synced
in my mind, is folly.
-
Not Synced
People horrified at the time
about many of these crimes
-
Not Synced
and you know to give an example
Ireland that half its population
-
Not Synced
either died or fled because of the potato
famine in the 19th century.
-
Not Synced
Whether it be, there's a brilliant book
-
Not Synced
by guy called Mike Davis called
late victorian holocaust.
-
Not Synced
It looks at how when tens of millions
of indians were starving to death
-
Not Synced
in the middle of the 19th century
-
Not Synced
The British were exporting grain
-
Not Synced
and leaving them to starve these are
crimes of historical proportions.
-
Not Synced
And what I am frustrated about this debate
-
Not Synced
is we talk about the you know we
have so much actually to be proud of
-
Not Synced
in our history that we don't talk about
-
Not Synced
like the people who fought
for our rights and freedoms
-
Not Synced
the people who fought
for the right to vote
-
Not Synced
for the welfare state against racism
-
Not Synced
against homophobia for
trade union rights workers rights
-
Not Synced
that's a history we should be proud of
-
Not Synced
not a history of subjugating
the world and invading it
-
Not Synced
don't going into other people's countries
-
Not Synced
taking their resources subjugating them
-
Not Synced
very often dehumanizing them
-
Not Synced
and very often killing them.
-
Not Synced
yes empires rise and empires fall !
-
Not Synced
No empire to the best of my knowledge
has been ever perfect
-
Not Synced
none of them has provided utopia
-
Not Synced
there's plenty like the soviet
empire for example
-
Not Synced
that have provided nothing but
the genocide of millions of people.
-
Not Synced
I think as empires go the British Empire
was generally speaking reasonably benign
-
Not Synced
and I think to characterize it
in the way that you say
-
Not Synced
for example ignoring the fact that were
it not for the the royal navy
-
Not Synced
with the slave trade have ended
-
Not Synced
well it's funny you should say that because of truth charles allen actually i'll tell you what i'll save you charles allen because anandita i saw you a couple of times wanted to come back in
-
Not Synced
You were talking about value system
-
Not Synced
and I think that's absolutely essential
-
Not Synced
in our sitting in judgment of our empire today
-
Not Synced
and like you said you know what was going on then
-
Not Synced
in the late 19th century in Africa
-
Not Synced
with the mama massacres and everything.
-
Not Synced
These are contemporary
concerns of those times
-
Not Synced
where this is where we need
to make a distinction
-
Not Synced
between the Roman Empire
and the British Empire.
-
Not Synced
Post enlightenment given
this is the post-humanist period.
-
Not Synced
We are talking of an age of liberalism,
-
Not Synced
we are talking from an age of humanism.
-
Not Synced
How could empire be justified
even by those contemporary standards ?
-
Not Synced
So this is not a 21st century inflection
-
Not Synced
of our values onto the
empire in those days
-
Not Synced
but by contemporary standards
this is post-humanism.
-
Not Synced
Can i talk about it Charles you can
-
Not Synced
and there is a lady right behind you
are you are you deferring
-
Not Synced
Yes of course I am I will be with you right up
-
Not Synced
good morning
-
Not Synced
Well the values and truth remains truth
-
Not Synced
whether it's in 18th century or 21st century.
-
Not Synced
One human should not exploit
another human full stop.
-
Not Synced
So whether it happened in 18th century
or 19th century or today.
-
Not Synced
So i would say
-
Not Synced
It is an absolute truth.
-
Not Synced
It is an absolute truth.
-
Not Synced
But Charles Charles
-
Not Synced
you know Empire the default position of history
-
Not Synced
we are all, the legacy of some empire everyone on the planet is
-
Not Synced
We have the Roman Empire Venetian Empire
-
Not Synced
the Arab Empire, the slave trade, the Islamic Empire
-
Not Synced
I mean on it goes should we be beating ourselves up about this ?
-
Not Synced
Obviously if you look at history it is essentially the exploitation of man by man
-
Not Synced
Yeah
-
Not Synced
The party humans are strong
-
Not Synced
So really you have a question
of what imperatives
-
Not Synced
Now if I can just look at the 18th century
-
Not Synced
which is when the British come onto the map in India
-
Not Synced
Now we have two three empires essentially
-
Not Synced
we have our Auranzeb the last of the Mughal Emperors
-
Not Synced
now he tries to rule India with one standard law which actually happens to be sharia
-
Not Synced
He brings in a whole series of rules
-
Not Synced
which essentially discriminate against the Hindus.
-
Not Synced
Now the other model we have are the Sikhs.
-
Not Synced
Now the Sikhs under Ranjit Singh are trying again
-
Not Synced
They are essentially nevertheless a predatory empire
-
Not Synced
They're expanding and they again have another model
-
Not Synced
which essentially draws on an even earlier system which is the caste system.
-
Not Synced
The cast system now I Sikhks would disagree with me I suspect.
-
Not Synced
But when I do this
-
Not Synced
We have the Hindu model.
-
Not Synced
Hindu model is deeply racist
-
Not Synced
Did we exploit the caste system or did we try to exploit the caste system.
-
Not Synced
What I am saying is that when the Brits come in
-
Not Synced
the British do try and have the idea that the law applies to all equally.
-
Not Synced
Okay
-
Not Synced
So this is a new model in the Indian context
-
Not Synced
and that there are advantages in that
-
Not Synced
which is today to this day the indian penal code
-
Not Synced
is developed by Macaulay in the 1830s
-
Not Synced
and it just still functions today.
-
Not Synced
All right Jagraj you com in here
-
Not Synced
Andre i'll be right with you.
-
Not Synced
I mentioned the caste system there
-
Not Synced
and you sort of were agreeing with the as i posited
-
Not Synced
the fact that it was exploited by the British ruling elite
-
Not Synced
Jagras first of all what's your when you look back at the British Empire what what do you think what are your feelings
-
Not Synced
Well, I grew up in India
till I was about eleven.
-
Not Synced
and I can tell you that just coming back to the point there
-
Not Synced
the fact is that now a lot of the voices
-
Not Synced
that were unheard
are coming out into the form.
-
Not Synced
So when we look back now
it's from a balanced
-
Not Synced
more balanced viewpoint.
-
Not Synced
We can look back and hear the voice
of those that were actually exploited
-
Not Synced
and we can realize actually you know it wasn't so good
-
Not Synced
and here what we're seeing now
-
Not Synced
is the propaganda.
-
Not Synced
and it was all designed to make people here feel good that actually this was a force for good and that that that viewpoint has endured
-
Not Synced
even though it wasn't real even though the people didn't want to be exploited
-
Not Synced
and many many Indians fought against the British to get them out of India
-
Not Synced
but that viewpoint was kept quiet
-
Not Synced
and the point that was sold to the British public here was that this is an empire that is actually designed to as a force for good
-
Not Synced
and what I find worst about this is that that viewpoint now looking back 100 years later and you're hearing about all the exploitation all the murders and we can still sit there thinking oh no there must be something good about it I think it's kind of this is fake it doesn't come it's not real.
-
Not Synced
In reality the people never wanted to be exploited
-
Not Synced
many many great nations were destroyed.
-
Not Synced
It's not mitigatedly negative.
-
Not Synced
There are no there's not a case of because you hear this a lot of mixed feelings, love hate.
-
Not Synced
There may be something good about
getting shot in the back
-
Not Synced
but you might say well some good came up
-
Not Synced
now we can straggle
-
Not Synced
we can look around for a few
straws here and there
-
Not Synced
and say well you know we had a benign rule
-
Not Synced
or you know that we made some railways
-
Not Synced
but in reality it was a very
exploitative system.
-
Not Synced
Dr.Lalvani, Kartar Lalvani,
you wouldn't come back.
-
Not Synced
It was during the British rule
-
Not Synced
when all the castes cultures and the races
-
Not Synced
really just worked together for the
first time in five thousand years.
-
Not Synced
It goes back the caste system.
-
Not Synced
Because of the British rule.
-
Not Synced
The first time in the British rule
-
Not Synced
they worked together in the army
-
Not Synced
all the untouchables and then everybody
-
Not Synced
worked and ran for the first time.
-
Not Synced
So was the railways.
-
Not Synced
Railways again hundreds of thousands
-
Not Synced
Boston telegraph hundreds of thousands work together
-
Not Synced
there's no problem.
-
Not Synced
It was actually the first time in the also
-
Not Synced
because they were India was a conglomerate of many kingdoms
-
Not Synced
and that's the British worked out together
-
Not Synced
and then time took time to collect put them out together
-
Not Synced
and conquered other things.
-
Not Synced
So a sense of nationhood almost was
-
Not Synced
In India was actually
-
Not Synced
it was British you created India,
-
Not Synced
there was no India before.
-
Not Synced
Out of conglomerate of many kingdoms
they made one India.
-
Not Synced
That was a good thing.
-
Not Synced
Yes, very good thing.
-
Not Synced
Can I ask you as well
-
Not Synced
can I ask you Dr. Lavani
-
Not Synced
do you think and
you do hear this sometimes
-
Not Synced
and it is a contentious thing
-
Not Synced
but you read it and you hear it when people say
-
Not Synced
ultimately in terms of social progress
-
Not Synced
the British empire in India
was a civilizing mission.
-
Not Synced
Do you believe that.
-
Not Synced
It certainly was.
-
Not Synced
It certainly was.
-
Not Synced
Most certainly, most certainly
-
Not Synced
I think British Empire destroyed
-
Not Synced
I will let you come back in a second
-
Not Synced
I will let you come back in a second
-
Not Synced
Just explain what you mean
-
Not Synced
Look here, certainly he should know better than anybody else
-
Not Synced
He is Sikh
-
Not Synced
but I don't know what he what he's saying
-
Not Synced
but let me tell you
-
Not Synced
it was first time, the burning of the sati
-
Not Synced
the widows with the waiters with husband's pyre by right
-
Not Synced
and they were thousand years there were many things
-
Not Synced
not one but one thing ever bothered to do anything about it
-
Not Synced
British stopped it but stopped it
-
Not Synced
and not only just British
-
Not Synced
but the British Company stopped it.
-
Not Synced
Company took a great risk by indulging into social matters
-
Not Synced
but the kings did not bother before
-
Not Synced
and this is the point that in black void is actually wrong
-
Not Synced
it's a more you have to have a more nuanced view
-
Not Synced
David sorry I will get Jagras to come back in
-
Not Synced
because Jagraj is extremely exercised
-
Not Synced
Lawrence in a second.
-
Not Synced
David I will let you come back
-
Not Synced
my Goodness, everyone wants to speak to me!
-
Not Synced
too yeah there's a lot of social reforms you know including the the infantry side
-
Not Synced
If the girl is born
-
Not Synced
the British stopped infantasy
-
Not Synced
They stopped it. It was banned. So a lot of things
-
Not Synced
and that the most of all people
should appreciate more should be Mr.Singh
-
Not Synced
You understand ?
-
Not Synced
Mr.Singh are these inconvenient truths ?
-
Not Synced
These civilizing influences and examples of social progress ?
-
Not Synced
I think what we are seeing here is
somebody, a mindset
-
Not Synced
which is basically the colonial mindset.
-
Not Synced
where when people who have been programmed to believe
-
Not Synced
that people are coming here to exploit you for your own good
-
Not Synced
and they don't they look past the exploitation
-
Not Synced
and they think oh well they gave us a few things.
-
Not Synced
Let me just go back to all those two points
-
Not Synced
that they raised about sati and about female infanticide.
-
Not Synced
Well, firstly the Guru's banned that.
-
Not Synced
So what we are seeing is that the empire
-
Not Synced
that the Sikhs built the law for every Sikh
-
Not Synced
and i'll take issue with that for days for a Sikh it was totally against the law
-
Not Synced
something made by the Gurus in the 17th century
-
Not Synced
to ever have sati or to have ever have in female infanticide.
-
Not Synced
and issues like this make me think that actually we had a very high culture
-
Not Synced
and then we were told oh your culture was actually terrible in fact it was amazing the sikh empire never had any capital punishment
-
Not Synced
so we had an empire that was so talented and yet nobody
-
Not Synced
No he was he was the king of the Sikh Empire
-
Not Synced
but he was not seen as an exemplary Sikh
-
Not Synced
he was punished by the Sikh authorities themselves
-
Not Synced
he was pulled to be whipped by the Sikh Empire in Amritsar.
-
Not Synced
Just kind of got you clarified and Andrea i've got you you know i'm coming i'm coming
-
Not Synced
but just clarify what you're saying but
-
Not Synced
i'm just saying if you go to lahore there you will see the imprints of all the wives of Ranjit Singh
-
Not Synced
who when he died when he died had to be cremated on his funeral pyre
-
Not Synced
now that does not actually they chose to be just to make that point i've tried the history they chose to be chosen
-
Not Synced
but listen we are not here saying that
-
Not Synced
we're not judging Ranjit Singh
-
Not Synced
You are defending seekerism as being anticipated.
-
Not Synced
So Sikhism versus Ranjit Singh are two very different things.
-
Not Synced
We're into a very very rich seam with this debate i feel Laurence Reese well first of all you launched James i do make a party
-
Not Synced
First of all we seem to be examining the tree
-
Not Synced
rather than having a look at the forest.
-
Not Synced
We've got odd incidents of the injustice here
-
Not Synced
hospital opened here so on.
-
Not Synced
I think take us into the context to come
-
Not Synced
yeah
-
Not Synced
The whole empire i take to be the forest
-
Not Synced
and I think we put it in context.
-
Not Synced
During the 18th and 19th century
-
Not Synced
there are two several revolutions in Europe.
-
Not Synced
An intellectual, a scientific and an industrial
-
Not Synced
and they gave Europe,
what i might call western Europe
-
Not Synced
certainly a preponderance of power
-
Not Synced
at the same time there is in Europe an enlightened movement to say we should share these things with other people
-
Not Synced
and if you like when the first, banal example perhaps,
-
Not Synced
but the first cinema opens in India in 1896
-
Not Synced
this is a very simple example of the sharing of knowledge.
-
Not Synced
Now that is quite important, it's quite essential.
-
Not Synced
The fact that there were a lot of cads and scoundrels and rascals
-
Not Synced
running this empire is certain
-
Not Synced
we will all agree on that there are also men of virtue and integrity and honesty
-
Not Synced
of course
-
Not Synced
and i think we should look in that general position
-
Not Synced
of the empire is transforming the world
-
Not Synced
and quite an amazing transformation.
-
Not Synced
Ultimately a force for good ?
-
Not Synced
I think a force for good
-
Not Synced
but there were some villains
hanging around, yes.
-
Not Synced
There are in all human institutions
-
Not Synced
Yeah, indeed so an engine an engine have changed there is a phrase that the the sun never set on the British Empire
-
Not Synced
because the almighty couldn't trust what the british would get up to in the dark
-
Not Synced
there was it was certainly a playground for many.
-
Not Synced
Femi Andrew one second but family's trying to come in here.
-
Not Synced
You have been responsible for the campaign to get rid of the cecil rhodes statue
-
Not Synced
Do you beg your pardon Andrew but I will be with you what would you say so we had to join us
-
Not Synced
We had a bit of talk about the instrumental instrumentalization
-
Not Synced
of the caste system in India in the British colonial rule.
-
Not Synced
The British raj was actually a model
-
Not Synced
for the use of the house of fulanis in northern nigeria an indirect rule there the british right was the was the model for a lot of what happened later in the process of colonization you mentioned
-
Not Synced
that there are legacies of empire i would say the darfur conflict and the recent civil war in sudan is a legacy of the fact that you split the arab north and the black african south into two segments
-
Not Synced
and developed the north whilst leaving the south.
-
Not Synced
and the British are entirely responsible for that ?
-
Not Synced
I would say that the British are largely responsible.
-
Not Synced
Before there was there was conflict in sudan
-
Not Synced
before the British came there was not racial conflict
-
Not Synced
There was conflict but it was not as heavily along racial lines.
-
Not Synced
Now there are.
-
Not Synced
I thought the northern parts of the Sudan were preying on the south
-
Not Synced
in the Sudanese slave trade which general gordon helped destroy
-
Not Synced
relied on the north, the islamic north
-
Not Synced
taking people from the tribal region to the south
-
Not Synced
and selling them into Egypt.
-
Not Synced
There are three segments you have animist and Christian, black Africans in the south you have in the middle, Muslim black Africans and you have the North Arab Muslims and it was a Muslim Animist conflict mainly before the imposition of Christianity in the south
-
Not Synced
and the kind of
-
Not Synced
But people make their own decisions to to rape and to pillage and exploit
-
Not Synced
whether that's the british they don't make their own decisions.
-
Not Synced
People make that like, this is the same argument of the fact that there is so much crime in Black America
-
Not Synced
is due to the fact that there are primordial tensions for these it's not it's socioeconomic and structural inequality
-
Not Synced
and in the same way so the gendered militia which i'm saying it's not our fault well no if you
-
Not Synced
if you look at most conflict in Africa at the moment
-
Not Synced
and you look at most ethnic conflict
-
Not Synced
a lot of it is due to um poverty
-
Not Synced
a lot of it is due to people
-
Not Synced
a lot of poke haram comes from our majority schools which are impoverished schools in northern nigeria where hundreds of kids have to go out and beg
-
Not Synced
I mean I have been to kaduna and seeing them myself so the rape of resources
-
Not Synced
and resources drawing on those straight lines on the map
-
Not Synced
Hey, David Vance, do you want to come back in here for a bit about that Andrea ?
-
Not Synced
Well, I mean just to revert back to what we have been talking about a couple of minutes ago.
-
Not Synced
It did take the British Empire to stop the burning of widows in India
-
Not Synced
and whilst we talk about so many other things
-
Not Synced
that was a clear dramatic demonstrable advance of civilization in that part of the world
-
Not Synced
and had it not been for Britain it wouldn't have happened.
-
Not Synced
Andrea
-
Not Synced
Yeah
-
Not Synced
i'm i saw it so long before coming
-
Not Synced
Thank you.
-
Not Synced
Yeah, going back to this whole thing around civilizing mission
-
Not Synced
I think what we have to understand is
-
Not Synced
that even in the 19th century the British felt they had to justify what they were doing
-
Not Synced
because it was known to be inherently wrong
-
Not Synced
so the emphasis on things like the abolition of sati
-
Not Synced
and i'm not going to defend burning widows for a second
-
Not Synced
and i'm not sorry that they abolished it
-
Not Synced
and i have problems with the idea of voluntary sati
-
Not Synced
so I am not defending that.
-
Not Synced
but I don't have a problem,
-
Not Synced
that's not why we were there.
-
Not Synced
that is a byproduct.
-
Not Synced
then that there were there were good people there there were noble-minded people there
-
Not Synced
because humans are you know we're complex creatures
-
Not Synced
who saw this and thought this is wrong
-
Not Synced
and who in very very good faith sought to
-
Not Synced
and succeeded in abolishing it
-
Not Synced
You give those people credit ?
-
Not Synced
I absolutely would give those people credit.
-
Not Synced
Of course in any place in any time
-
Not Synced
there are good people and bad people
-
Not Synced
and there are people who are working from good intentions
-
Not Synced
what they believe to be good intentions at the time
-
Not Synced
and also those who are willing to sort of undertake nefarious acts
-
Not Synced
to personally profit or profit the nation
-
Not Synced
of course there's good and bad.
-
Not Synced
Rose in just one second to talk about the spread of religion
-
Not Synced
I don't think that we can take a few examples
-
Not Synced
of civilizing mission
-
Not Synced
I mean sati affected maybe 500 widows a year ?
-
Not Synced
There are thousands of pages,
-
Not Synced
thousands of pages of parliamentary papers on them
-
Not Synced
none at all on hundreds of thousands of people who died of famine.
-
Not Synced
professor Lavani
-
Not Synced
Yes, I think it is it is far far more to be appreciated
-
Not Synced
that the authority who stopped it was a company
-
Not Synced
and company was solely responsible to directors
-
Not Synced
East India Company
-
Not Synced
to do what the kings could not dare to do in India before
-
Not Synced
and they did it to courage to do it this is it's a very great very great achievement
-
Not Synced
it is really much it's not just normally stopped you know an early manifestation
-
Not Synced
they were advancing globalization yeah they were strongly advised advice what you're seeing here is the best of best of british values
-
Not Synced
and we can't say that Britain has no good values
-
Not Synced
army yeah I spent four years i believed in British values
-
Not Synced
yeah
-
Not Synced
I do think that the current Britain we are living in now does have at the best very good enlightened values
-
Not Synced
that is not to say that we look back in India
-
Not Synced
and and and find a few little good things that we did and then say well the whole thing must have been good
-
Not Synced
the reality is they did the good things they did i don't know where to start from
-
Not Synced
There's so many one after other
-
Not Synced
Railway was I have a 20 chapter book of doing good
-
Not Synced
there is only Railway is only oneone the
-
Not Synced
the rest is it comes about 20 one after other
-
Not Synced
now you see judiciary what what judiciary was before
-
Not Synced
and the judiciary civic society judiciary system the universe
-
Not Synced
First university in India was built by British
-
Not Synced
The Empress of India, Queen Victoria
-
Not Synced
Yeah
-
Not Synced
She never went there did she
-
Not Synced
University was built by the company itself
-
Not Synced
Okay, listen everyone,
listen everyone.
-
Not Synced
Femi mentioned the religious there in Sudan Animism and Islam and Christianity let's talk i'm sorry
-
Not Synced
It brings us actually on nicely to talking about religion
-
Not Synced
and the missing missionary position if you like
-
Not Synced
spreading I wish I had not said that spread spreading spreading the word
-
Not Synced
spreading the the the good word of the of the lord
-
Not Synced
that wasn't a good thing though, was it ?
-
Not Synced
You were you were destroying people's cultures
-
Not Synced
I am not saying you were Rose
-
Not Synced
but people's cultures were destroyed
-
Not Synced
Absolutely, I would agree with that entirely
-
Not Synced
and as a Christian I want to say yes to christianity
-
Not Synced
but at the same time recognizing
-
Not Synced
that along with Christianity
-
Not Synced
people brought their own culture with them
-
Not Synced
and of course you know people had
their own religions where they were
-
Not Synced
and the audacity of the British Empire
-
Not Synced
to think that we know what is right
-
Not Synced
and yours is no longer
important or valuable
-
Not Synced
but you know there was health
-
Not Synced
and education some of the the longest
-
Not Synced
serving establishments in terms of education
-
Not Synced
and health were brought through
the Christian medium there
-
Not Synced
so it is not so much
-
Not Synced
another cure its egg
-
Not Synced
whatever you may call it
-
Not Synced
but the reality is we cannot just say
-
Not Synced
I personally with my hand
on my heart cannot say
-
Not Synced
that I am proud of the British Empire
-
Not Synced
because it and I am not just looking at it
-
Not Synced
through rose tinted lense
-
Not Synced
as it were
-
Not Synced
as it were I
-
Not Synced
I really do believe
-
Not Synced
that some awful things were done
-
Not Synced
and you mentioned about
-
Not Synced
the the British demolishing slavery
-
Not Synced
they didn't
-
Not Synced
it was the people who were being enslaved
-
Not Synced
who were making slavery unworkable
-
Not Synced
I am afraid Rose, what that does is
-
Not Synced
that simply contradicts the fact
-
Not Synced
that the British navy was the instrument
-
Not Synced
to ensure that the slave trade
was eventually
-
Not Synced
it is a matter of historical fact how
-
Not Synced
can you deny history ?
-
Not Synced
Let's go to the audience.
-
Not Synced
The navy actually took africans
-
Not Synced
and indentured them on the Caribbean
-
Not Synced
to work just like slate
but that's a bad thing
-
Not Synced
they also took many back to Africa
-
Not Synced
again to endure poverty and trouble
-
Not Synced
so in fact it was not a good
thing that the navy did
-
Not Synced
Not at all!
-
Not Synced
Don't believe that brother.
-
Not Synced
So had it so you would
-
Not Synced
you think that had the royal navy
-
Not Synced
not sought to stop the slave trade
-
Not Synced
it would have magically stopped anyway ?
-
Not Synced
No they didn't no no no no no
-
Not Synced
They actually encouraged it in the sense
-
Not Synced
of using those same Africans
-
Not Synced
to do what the planters wanted.
-
Not Synced
That was the point.
-
Not Synced
Well, hence, of course the Jamaican rebellion
-
Not Synced
which was some years after emancipation
-
Not Synced
because of the disappointment
-
Not Synced
emancipation had not made
a difference to their lives
-
Not Synced
and that was very brutally put down
-
Not Synced
when was it it was the 1865
-
Not Synced
65
-
Not Synced
So this gentleman wants to promote
-
Not Synced
this image of some Utopian British Empire
-
Not Synced
and then talking about a Soviet dystopia.
-
Not Synced
The Caribbean was a dystopia for the Caribbean people
-
Not Synced
The Africans who were transported as German said
-
Not Synced
and you are trying to present this position
-
Not Synced
about the navy cancelling slavery
-
Not Synced
say who stopped slavery
-
Not Synced
It was the Africans who for hundreds of years
-
Not Synced
in the Caribbean rebelled
violently against their own Gods.
-
Not Synced
At the same time granted
there were a lot of people in the UK
-
Not Synced
who fought for abolition as well
-
Not Synced
but don't ______ this position
-
Not Synced
because from the early from the late 1500s until 1833
-
Not Synced
there was that forced migration of 20 million people
-
Not Synced
plus all of their descendants forced dehumanization,
-
Not Synced
rape and movement of culture and eradication of culture
-
Not Synced
for you to then try and say oh the navy stopped
-
Not Synced
it it's frankly historically disingenuous.
-
Not Synced
Well, I can die from that yeah
-
Not Synced
About the navy point,
-
Not Synced
the French was of the early 19th century
-
Not Synced
when we were fighting the French
-
Not Synced
it was partly just just an excuse
to attack french ships.
-
Not Synced
Okay, we have abolished slavery
-
Not Synced
the people have abolished slavery
-
Not Synced
how can we attack the French ?
-
Not Synced
I know the French who yes granted it was your other Europeans who were transporting slaves across
-
Not Synced
and who canceled their own slave trades after
-
Not Synced
and excuse them to attack French ships
-
Not Synced
because when we are at peace with the French we can't just attack them
-
Not Synced
but since we don't like slavery anymore
-
Not Synced
we can attack any ship flying French colours
-
Not Synced
you read the historical parliamentary papers
-
Not Synced
the excuse essentially let's attack the French
-
Not Synced
because they're we're in a time of peace
-
Not Synced
but they're carrying the flag
-
Not Synced
so don't try and posit the navy as this great humanization force
-
Not Synced
when it was that same navy who enforced that policy of forced migration of people for 350 years prior.
-
Not Synced
But i'm not suggesting
-
Not Synced
Excuse me
-
Not Synced
Do you want to come sit in the front row ?
-
Not Synced
I think we need to put this in context,
-
Not Synced
we have to also understand
-
Not Synced
that while all this debate about abolishing was going on
-
Not Synced
forty percent of the contemporary state budget
-
Not Synced
was given to former slave owners as compensation
-
Not Synced
forty of the contemporary state budget!
-
Not Synced
that much amount of money was at stake here
-
Not Synced
that was given over to the slave owners.
-
Not Synced
Why did they need to be pacified ?
-
Not Synced
Why did they need to be paid compensation
-
Not Synced
for exploiting people's lives ?
-
Not Synced
Well, of course it wasn't impossible
-
Not Synced
I mean i mean somewhere at the end of the the slave trade is it's like going on a killing spree
-
Not Synced
and then saying I don't like killing anymore you won't pat him on the back foot would you
-
Not Synced
but the one i just wanted to bring that point about cinemas
-
Not Synced
which i thought was quite a curious point
-
Not Synced
because it is possible to have cultural exchange
-
Not Synced
and to share culture and ideas
-
Not Synced
without conquering much of the world
-
Not Synced
and inflicting famines which
-
Not Synced
is this argument that somehow that again which is we're applying 21st century standards to the past
-
Not Synced
in the 1950s there was the marijuana uprising in kKnya against British rule
-
Not Synced
and the British Empire responded brutally killed thousands of people here wasn't it
-
Not Synced
that there were people i'm just making this point
-
Not Synced
people spoke up against it do you know who one of them was
-
Not Synced
that well-known lefty Enoch Powell
-
Not Synced
who condemned the British brutality in Kenya.
-
Not Synced
The point I am making is this
-
Not Synced
there were people, there were people who stood up against this brutality
-
Not Synced
and it is a disservice and a smear on those people at the time
-
Not Synced
who fought for the freedom of people
-
Not Synced
to say that they did not do so and we're just applying this
-
Not Synced
the broader point here which some don't seem to seem to have rather overlooked this no one's arguing that the british empire was a model a utopian model of empire there never has been a utopian
-
Not Synced
Yes, but the broader point here
-
Not Synced
which some don't seem to rather overlooked this
-
Not Synced
No one is arguing that the British Empire
-
Not Synced
was a model, a Utopian model of empire.
-
Not Synced
There never has been a Utopian model of empire.
-
Not Synced
model of empire let me finish my point
-
Not Synced
There's never been a Utopian model of empire
-
Not Synced
the very fact that the British empire
-
Not Synced
did contribute towards in the mid 18th century
-
Not Synced
towards the stopping of the slave trade
-
Not Synced
shows that it was a more enlightened empire
-
Not Synced
than many other ones that existed
-
Not Synced
but you're not here to whinge about them.
-
Not Synced
that you agree with that
-
Not Synced
iIthink i think the Arab Empire was far more brutal
-
Not Synced
Yeah
-
Not Synced
I want to make just one point though,
-
Not Synced
the thing with the Arab Empire,
-
Not Synced
because the Sikhs suffered from both the British Empire and the Arab Empire
-
Not Synced
Yeah
-
Not Synced
The thing with the Arab Empire the Sikhs knew was
-
Not Synced
is that these are enemies we are going to fight them.
-
Not Synced
With the British Empire.
it was it was a bit more nuanced
-
Not Synced
How they tried to do was
-
Not Synced
is they tried to change the Sikh religion.
-
Not Synced
So the Arabs never really tried to change the secret religion
-
Not Synced
and try to twist it to suit them
-
Not Synced
it was just straight out it was clear enemies
-
Not Synced
they are your enemies and you are theirs.
-
Not Synced
With the British it was very much a case of take a religion
-
Not Synced
which was very independent very free very freedom loving
-
Not Synced
and try and convert that into something which you can use for your own benefit
-
Not Synced
convince these people to join the British Army
-
Not Synced
convince them that it's for their own good
-
Not Synced
and then use them to then subjugate other Indians.
-
Not Synced
The British were far more
-
Not Synced
Subtle
-
Not Synced
No, not subtle
-
Not Synced
Insidious
-
Not Synced
Insidious yes, exactly.
-
Not Synced
Dangerous.
-
Not Synced
Lawrence, let's talk about decolonization.
-
Not Synced
There are things I want to return to as well,
-
Not Synced
the Christianization as well
-
Not Synced
because that's left
-
Not Synced
it's when we come on to talk about legacies
-
Not Synced
that's left some people argue.
-
Not Synced
Some very negative legacies and it's tearing apart the anglican communion
-
Not Synced
At the moment with very conservative christianity
-
Not Synced
homophobia rife in the West Indies
-
Not Synced
and in Africa Jamaica
-
Not Synced
but Lawrence let's talk about decolonization
-
Not Synced
and generally those,
-
Not Synced
sitting down in those straight lines drawn
-
Not Synced
on the map in Africa and no understanding of tribal
-
Not Synced
or ethnic complexities in that continent
-
Not Synced
I mean I suppose empires have been historically rather short on foresight
-
Not Synced
but we made some terrible mistakes there
-
Not Synced
Didn't we ?
-
Not Synced
Well, I am not sure, African states
-
Not Synced
no let's think of it if there were
-
Not Synced
how many African states are fighting
boundary wars at the moment ?
-
Not Synced
Quite a few actually.
-
Not Synced
You have a lot of interest
-
Not Synced
Well, then they will fight them.
-
Not Synced
but let's forget about the boundaries
-
Not Synced
I think that that's slightly irrelevant.
-
Not Synced
What is relevant is that in the British Empire between 1939-1945
-
Not Synced
The British government asked
-
Not Synced
for the assistance of the subjects of empire
-
Not Synced
to fight the second world war
-
Not Synced
and this generated a powerful sense of reciprocity.
-
Not Synced
Well I think Indians and africans knew what Hitler and Mussolini had in store for them.
-
Not Synced
It was very nasty.
-
Not Synced
So they fought and at the end of the war in 1945
-
Not Synced
a lot thousands upon tens of thousands of them
-
Not Synced
in the French as well as the British Empire came home
-
Not Synced
and asked the question
-
Not Synced
we have risked our lives in a fight
-
Not Synced
which we have been told
-
Not Synced
and rightly so I believe was a morally good cause
-
Not Synced
what do we have in return ?
-
Not Synced
We have been fighting a war for freedom,
-
Not Synced
the freedoms of president Franklin Roosevelt's
-
Not Synced
the Atlantic charter
-
Not Synced
what share are we going to get of the spoils of this war
-
Not Synced
and I think that's the first thing in the background
-
Not Synced
to decolonization
-
Not Synced
thousands and thousands of Africans
-
Not Synced
with an educated elite and ex-soldiers were asking the question
-
Not Synced
this freedom we fought for for five years
-
Not Synced
when is it coming to us
-
Not Synced
and the British government turned round and said,
-
Not Synced
"Well, I think we have got to consider decolonization
-
Not Synced
in 45 labour government comes to power promising in india no money
-
Not Synced
so we liked them yes they won it and it was a manifesto the labor said
-
Not Synced
we will give independence to India, Shalom and Burma
-
Not Synced
and this was in the labor manifesto
-
Not Synced
and of course it came about in 1947.
-
Not Synced
They go further into saying this will be extended to Africa
-
Not Synced
No one could work out quite what the timetable will be
-
Not Synced
the 1990s was given until 1950 and then something else happens in 1945
-
Not Synced
and i'll cut off here we have the beginning of a cold war yes in which newly independent countries are going to find that the soviet union and the united states are competing for them
-
Not Synced
They are coming along and saying join us vote for us
-
Not Synced
in the united nations we will help you
-
Not Synced
and to finish 1954 an African ruler of an independent country uh
-
Not Synced
wants weapons and he asks khrushchev for weapons khrushchev says i will give you mig fighters i will give you tank
-
Not Synced
I will make Egypt strong to fight in this case Israel
-
Not Synced
but also to resist any encroachments by Britain
-
Not Synced
and then you have Africa decolonizing at the same time as the soviet union
-
Not Synced
and the united states are looking for world power
-
Not Synced
and confronting each other.
-
Not Synced
And so we are rather irrelevant
-
Not Synced
Well, Britain does become irrelevant
-
Not Synced
yeah but and interestingly of course nasser there are there are arguments
-
Not Synced
well-sourced arguments that that secular regime of nasa the reaction to it has led to many of the seeds of islamism
-
Not Synced
and the problems we have there one thing leads to another basically can i ask you
-
Not Synced
because you've been trying to come back in anandita
-
Not Synced
If you were if we talk about 4647 the India's uh freedom if you were to have to drawn uh to draw a mat to draw a line on the map and to have done it better
-
Not Synced
What would you have done ?
-
Not Synced
Over to you
-
Not Synced
That's what we're looking for.
-
Not Synced
Well, I certainly would have taken more than two weeks to draw that body.
-
Not Synced
I think you know this question isn't it it is it is um so if
-
Not Synced
if i can slightly uh evade that question
-
Not Synced
and come come to another
-
Not Synced
there's so many things just been
bandied about in this debate
-
Not Synced
that I want to get back to one is
-
Not Synced
the idea that Britain gave India independence in 1947 is a myth
-
Not Synced
I think we need to get over that
-
Not Synced
so all the civilizing that we had been
doing for all this period
-
Not Synced
we did all this great good to the people
-
Not Synced
and this was the time when we felt
-
Not Synced
that India was right to be handed over its its freedom
-
Not Synced
and we left it didn't work like that Britain was in a terrible mess in the post-war situation
-
Not Synced
and it might have been in the labor manifesto for obvious reasons
-
Not Synced
but it was also a question of this was becoming a very expensive colony
-
Not Synced
to maintain it just could not have happened.
-
Not Synced
The congress showed itself as downright
-
Not Synced
non-cooperative during the second world war
-
Not Synced
and this was the last straw
-
Not Synced
this was the time when they were absolutely sure
-
Not Synced
that no more kind of cooperative
-
Not Synced
talks could go on between themselves and and Britain.
-
Not Synced
So from from the point of view of the indian freedom struggle it had reached its its its head as well so you know this had to be solved
-
Not Synced
so it was internal pressure as well
-
Not Synced
so it wasn't just the war and all the aspirations for liberation
-
Not Synced
that had been you know kind of suddenly
-
Not Synced
sparked alive in people that this led to you know this is a this is a freedom struggle that goes back to 1885
-
Not Synced
it isn't suddenly the second world war which is creating all these aspirations in people.
-
Not Synced
Can I just quickly finish ?
-
Not Synced
So you know that that is one myth we we should we should get over
-
Not Synced
and if I can return to what Dr.Lalvani was saying earlier on
-
Not Synced
the idea again that the nation itself
was a gift of Britain to India
-
Not Synced
does not absolutely hold true at all
-
Not Synced
it wasn't western education it wasn't railways it wasn't the civilizing mission that did all of this but it was the presence of the British in india
-
Not Synced
it was the anti-colonial
nature of the struggle
-
Not Synced
that brought India together
-
Not Synced
so the British contributed to the Indian nation
-
Not Synced
but by just being there and being what they were which was an oppressive colonial regime
-
Not Synced
but yeah let's let's talk about legacy as well not just decolonization but legacy of
-
Not Synced
for example in Africa we paved the way to apartheid didn't we david vance
-
Not Synced
many of the femi touched on this many of the problems in Africa today are down to how we behaved what we did
-
Not Synced
Should we hide our our heads in shame because
-
Not Synced
No I don't think that the problems today
-
Not Synced
right now today in Africa our attitudes to race can be can be laid at the heart at the door of an empire long since gone Nicky.
-
Not Synced
I mean it's time we people have to accept responsibility
-
Not Synced
for themselves in their own independence
-
Not Synced
people today are still suffering because of the traits of the slave trade,
-
Not Synced
aren't they
-
Not Synced
which which of course is being carried out by other rising empires
-
Not Synced
such as for example some of the in terms of the Islamic Empires that we see cropping up.
-
Not Synced
No we cannot be carrying the consistent guilt over everything that isn't perfect in every part of the world
-
Not Synced
you know we were not a perfect empire
-
Not Synced
I have not said that we were.
-
Not Synced
Did we make mistakes ?
Yes we did!
-
Not Synced
but we have done good!
-
Not Synced
and as well regards Africa
-
Not Synced
I would simply raise this one final point
-
Not Synced
when for example, Zambia
-
Not Synced
whenever it was part of the British Empire
-
Not Synced
we ruled and governed in it the average zambian had an income of about one-seventh of what we had here.
-
Not Synced
All these years later what do they have ?
-
Not Synced
127th of the income we have that
-
Not Synced
Whose fault is that ?
-
Not Synced
We have gone.
-
Not Synced
Who's responsible ?
-
Not Synced
I don't think you can separate
-
Not Synced
as being the fifth richest country
-
Not Synced
in the world from our colonial past.
-
Not Synced
Secondly, there is a few points I want to make
-
Not Synced
first one is on owen and what he said about the mao mao insurrection we should keep talking about this civilizing mission
-
Not Synced
How is bringing civilization to a culture
-
Not Synced
systematic internment camps of 1.5 million people
-
Not Synced
rape anal rape of men with snakes
-
Not Synced
and scorpions and knives
-
Not Synced
you have you have you have women
-
Not Synced
and pregnant women shot
-
Not Synced
you have kids when the British went to Australia
-
Not Synced
Are there atrocities in all that other atrocities in all empires ?
-
Not Synced
There are trustees in the French empire
-
Not Synced
There are trustees in the French empire
-
Not Synced
there are trustees in the buildin
-
Not Synced
There are trustees in all empires.
-
Not Synced
but they were not attracted because human beings these people were not writing about liberalism at the time and freedom there are atrocities in all empires but yes that there are um but not that not all empires call themselves civilizing missions um well moving but yeah everyone else is
-
Not Synced
You mentioned, how many wars are there in Africa at the moment
-
Not Synced
in a kind of flippant way the British media does nothing to cover the congo civil war the biggest war since world war II
-
Not Synced
it doesn't look at it
-
Not Synced
the British media did not look at the Angolan war
-
Not Synced
which went on even though it was not a British x colony
-
Not Synced
no but it went on for 40 odd years which is two-thirds of the extent to which some of the last colonies were
-
Not Synced
and then you're they're saying it's not that long ago this
-
Not Synced
is 60 years is in is not a it's not a very long time long term
-
Not Synced
the great span of history
-
Not Synced
in the greatest benefits we haven't heard from you for a while in a second we're going to talk about legacy Charles
-
Not Synced
I think there's an awful tendency to simplify
-
Not Synced
the fact is that we do not study this period
-
Not Synced
and indeed in many countries which are newly liberated
-
Not Synced
or been liberated from 1947 onwards and i use that word liberty it is a liberation um they do not study anything rather than the freedom movement india is a classic example
-
Not Synced
if you ask people about what happened uh in the 19th century people will not know because this freedom movement has now become we need national myths we need founding myths
-
Not Synced
and i can understand why every country whether it's kenya or if it needs to portray the freedom struggle in the most positive terms but it's it's all ambivalent there are there are nuances here which are being missed in the question of mauma
-
Not Synced
for instance how many other tribes beyond the kikuyu got involved how much of that was actually about land grabbing by the kikuyu how much of that who were the victims other africans
-
Not Synced
who were the main victims very few europeans actually got killed by the malmo so it's not simple black and white this is history my worry is that now we're getting a black and white history but there are so many nuances involved in this yeah and the great delight do you want nuances are the great delights of history aren't they let's talk
-
Not Synced
about legacy you can come in without me even asking you a question i would like it's not necessarily to go away feeling guilty about the atrocities of the british empire what i want us to do however is to acknowledge that there were these major major issues that that is still
-
Not Synced
that is still impacting on us today so for example by virtue for example of paying the slave owners and and giving nothing to those who are the victims of it have left people still in that victim mode by virtue of um taking away a people's culture um killing
-
Not Synced
who they are still exists today and that is why the racism that exists in in our in our present time exists because we still think we are white we are great black you are not good enough but it's not this is gross can i just say something yes this is this is right
-
Not Synced
it's the legacy we see this happening all over the world from upsets of one set of human beings towards another set of humans we see that we see the chinese empire the rape of resources in africa from the chinese empire
-
Not Synced
at the moment there are still the american empire the chinese empire there will always be empires there will always be things yeah we are discussing the present which do you think it has a uniquely uh pernicious legacy because of the slave trade
-
Not Synced
because of the racial aspect it it is there we cannot deny it is still it is still there why is it that our children today do not learn about um cultural things of their particular groups why is it only what is eurocentric
-
Not Synced
or can we take upon ourselves a type of collective guilt people watching the you know today can should we feel guilty guilt is useless guilt is useful are we are we responsible in the way we speak christianity
-
Not Synced
for homophobia i was listening to a documentary the other day about homophobia in jamaica and they were saying look you gave us the bible you gave us the truth and we believed it and all of a sudden you're telling us not to believe it well
-
Not Synced
i i would agree that that is wrong i would never condone that but the point that i have are we responsible for it spreading those attitudes back in the 80s i think we did we did spread those and and we are reaping the legacy of it today so do you think the spreading of christianity was wrong therefore it's not so much about the spreading of christianity
-
Not Synced
it's what we packaged it in but i just want to explain something simply those okay those there's very strong arguments that we are responsible for the spread of homophobia in spreading those attitudes but there have been generation after generation to change the penal codes and they haven't changed the penal codes so can we still put the blame on our door
-
Not Synced
i that is a very good question i think we are very much still under the the umbrella of it as it were of that painful time in history still very close to mcgregor audience audience yes you've had your hand up for so long and i've got i've been trying there's been a lot of talked this morning
-
Not Synced
and i think the saddest thing should come every week yeah the saddest thing is i think i've seen this morning is the typical british way where the two sikhs have been arguing the most i find that interesting we talked about how the british went they were non-civilized let me tell you we had you just talked about the mughal empire
-
Not Synced
preceding the british empire they were more than civilized they didn't need you to come in sati is not an islamic principle but let's modernize it as a young british pakistani muslim what we're talking about
-
Not Synced
now angers me the most muslims are always told you don't integrate you're not involved black people are always told you're not good enough you're not smart enough there's something about your culture your criminals you need to follow this way of life
-
Not Synced
the reality is the british empire is the biggest reason that racism exists today in this country when you have people
-
Not Synced
like this on the front row who will always see black brown asian people as being below them we subjugated you we owned you at one stage we you can't get above you above your level how dare you get anywhere
-
Not Synced
one of the arguments you hear is that one of the positive legacies of the british empire is our multicultural society
-
Not Synced
it's not working is it because there's a multiculturalism to an extent they always want to keep you at a level
-
Not Synced
they don't want to progress so let's talk about what we do what do we do next well it's interesting in your intro you talked about indian pakistan
-
Not Synced
being the jewel in the crown literally the jewel in the crown you've still got the jewel in your crown we wanted micro no in the queen's
-
Not Synced
it needs to be returned back to the people you stole it from i won't recreate it from anyone
-
Not Synced
there's a lot of use going on here
-
Not Synced
charles allen the korean charles allen should go back to the tribal people in golconda okay that's they're the ones who turn it up return it it certainly shouldn't go to lahore
-
Not Synced
very few because it's gone through hundreds of rulers and conquerors over the centuries the idea that these little simple tokens
-
Not Synced
that's not enough yeah it's not just let me go back there to that gentleman there you've you've been yeah you you
-
Not Synced
good morning to you good morning hi well quick point yeah very quickly well i i just needed a minute uh what i want to say
-
Not Synced
is i've heard some of the most preposterous comments today made by many panelists which one which one most of all mainly from this side but we started as an india with the nation
-
Not Synced
nationhood was given by britain thank you yes but that was and then there were infrastructure that was laid whether it was indian indian penal code indian uh post office
-
Not Synced
or indian railways indian army these were all central to the development of the the empire that the infrastructure was necessary so it was for their own needs as uh one of our panelists
-
Not Synced
we we had that point out earlier well we haven't got a lot of time but what i'm what i'm coming to is the also the social engineering
-
Not Synced
that we talked about earlier is was not given by the british it was by all the social engineers
-
Not Synced
like raja ram mohan roy uh people like gandhi ambedkar they they they are the ones who did okay
-
Not Synced
i just think that point you made about race and racism is just is critical because obviously to justify empire people
-
Not Synced
who were being colonized were dehumanized they had to be seen as inferior because you wouldn't possibly allow for that sort of barrier
-
Not Synced
to be conducted against people you would see as being like yourself and that legacy scars our society today but just finally i do think the worry is i have are people going to watch this
-
Not Synced
and go oh you will just custody in britain it's a big british anti-british hate fest and the truth is what frightens me is in our curriculum
-
Not Synced
in schools across the country what we're not seeing is the history we should be proud of that i spoke about before people of all backgrounds and faiths freedoms are you proud of churchill
-
Not Synced
i'm proud of the british war effort against the nazis of the people service people who went to as they say it's like he had racially supremacist attitudes he did yeah well of course
-
Not Synced
the people who run the british would you like to take his stuff churchill would you like a statue in the long run
-
Not Synced
i think having a statue of someone who called um who called he said indians were ghastly people with a ghastly religion the famine was their own fault because they bred
-
Not Synced
like rabbits he said he said many things churchill is is is ultimately would you like to there's a statue i'm not going to make a comment on that because i'll be dragged through
-
Not Synced
the daily mail tomorrow nonetheless nonetheless just to make your point on the um on the uh you said chinese rape of african resources as if shell was not a british dutch company it was not paying the nigerian government in we are now a 1990 society
-
Not Synced
china and we can build we can build on it and go forward is that for you what is the positive legacy what can people look at and remember is there anything about the empire that still binds us together
-
Not Synced
right i think commonwealth for me is a good thing and i am glad that you gave us cricket in that we and i'm talking with my caribbean hats on i gave you cricket yes and look what we're doing with it look how terrific we are but but i'm also glad that right here in britain we can be a truly we're not we're not fully there yet we need to work at it
-
Not Synced
we need to work at better being being a better diverse and multi-ethnic multicultural society celebration there are three three enduring legacies that that we can be proud of we've left libera
-
Not Synced
l we spread liberal capitalism around the world to the annoyance of some we shared a form of government which in many ways still continues and last but by no means least 450 million people speak english
-
Not Synced
with and in some regards what what what a wonderful legacy as well so there's lots to be proud of we've heard lots of grievance gravens mongeri going on wait andre
-
Not Synced
you have the very last word and it's a quick one well they only need to speak english today as the global lingua franca precisely because we did colonise half
-
Not Synced
listen we did a shakespeare special a few weeks ago but let's just you know when i speak to my kids
-
Not Synced
i have to constantly tell them you've got to speak to elders with a bit more respect because english does not have that verb left anymore for adults
-
Not Synced
which french has and it's not a good thing you know it's an achievement but it's not a great achievement it's actually a very negative immigration
-
Not Synced
which french has and it's not a good thing you know it's an achievement but it's not a great achievement it's actually a very negative immigration
-
Not Synced
they we are here because we're finished rose we're finished rose the sun will never set on the big questions thank you very much for watching see you very soon
-
Not Synced
you