Can countries not be egoists? | Anastasia Kalinina | TEDxDvortsovayaSquare
-
0:11 - 0:13We live in fascinating times.
-
0:13 - 0:17This is the most dynamic time
in the history of humanity. -
0:17 - 0:21Everything is changing very,
very fast, my friends. -
0:21 - 0:24Just in the past 30 years,
people have invented -
0:24 - 0:29internet, smartphones, cloning, drones,
-
0:29 - 0:32portable GPS, flat screens.
-
0:32 - 0:35Tinder alone is quite
noteworthy, isn’t it? -
0:35 - 0:38An object created by humans
-
0:38 - 0:41left the solar system for the first time.
-
0:41 - 0:43We are preparing to colonize Mars.
-
0:43 - 0:48Look at how modern factories
are starting to look. -
0:49 - 0:53And this is how they looked just
some 30 years ago, in the 1990s. -
0:53 - 0:57You see how modern smartphones look.
-
0:57 - 1:01Now you will see it ... most likely.
-
1:02 - 1:04Believe me, they look really cool.
-
1:04 - 1:07We use them every day
and know what they are capable of. -
1:08 - 1:12And they look very different
from the mobile phones of the 1990s. -
1:12 - 1:15And that, too, was just 30 years ago.
-
1:15 - 1:17This is what a contemporary
car looks like. -
1:17 - 1:19It’s full of electronics.
-
1:19 - 1:22And here is how it looked in the 1990s.
-
1:22 - 1:25And now please
have a look at this picture. -
1:25 - 1:28This is a parliament in 2019.
-
1:28 - 1:31And this is a parliament
in the beginning of the 21st century. -
1:33 - 1:37Here is a parliament
in the beginning of the 20th century. -
1:37 - 1:39And here - you can hardly believe it -
-
1:39 - 1:41a parliament,
-
1:41 - 1:44a parliament in the beginning
of the 19th century. -
1:44 - 1:45Is it just me
-
1:45 - 1:49or can you not see much difference
between these pictures either? -
1:50 - 1:55I find it outrageous that politics,
-
1:55 - 1:58which affects so many things in our lives,
-
1:58 - 2:02remains one of the most
conservative and inflexible systems. -
2:03 - 2:04Think about it.
-
2:04 - 2:07The way we organize governance,
-
2:07 - 2:10the way we build relationships
with our neighbors, -
2:10 - 2:12and the way we manage our resources
-
2:12 - 2:16have not changed for decades
and even centuries. -
2:17 - 2:21We are long overdue for a global
reform of the political system. -
2:21 - 2:22We cannot go on like this.
-
2:22 - 2:27We need fundamental changes
in political processes -
2:27 - 2:30on both regional and global levels.
-
2:30 - 2:32We need new global regulations
-
2:32 - 2:34for our financial and tax systems.
-
2:35 - 2:40We need new forms of citizenship,
possibly independent of geography. -
2:41 - 2:42Nowadays, the circumstances
-
2:42 - 2:45in which we were lucky
or not so lucky to be born -
2:45 - 2:50determine our well-being,
our opportunities, -
2:50 - 2:51and, let’s be honest,
-
2:51 - 2:53our mere chances of survival.
-
2:53 - 2:55Isn’t it rather archaic?
-
2:56 - 3:00I think that our descendants
may also find it bizarre -
3:00 - 3:03that we all were divided into 193 groups.
-
3:03 - 3:07Every group had its symbol,
a picture inside a rectangle. -
3:07 - 3:10Some would have horizontal
stripes of different colors, -
3:10 - 3:14others would have vertical stripes,
some would have a circle in the middle, -
3:14 - 3:16others would have a cross.
-
3:16 - 3:19Some tried to be more original,
-
3:19 - 3:22which they probably shouldn’t have.
-
3:23 - 3:30Even if people from those groups
were not so different from each other, -
3:30 - 3:34it was crucial to them to prove
that they were better than the rest, -
3:34 - 3:36at least in some respect.
-
3:36 - 3:39Only because they were born
in a certain territory. -
3:40 - 3:42This doesn't make much sense.
-
3:42 - 3:47People who focused on proving
that their group was better -
3:47 - 3:50were prepared to do so at all costs.
-
3:50 - 3:54They made sacrifices, they suffered.
-
3:54 - 3:57They went as far as sending
their own children to war, -
3:57 - 4:00all in pursuit of those
illusory objectives. -
4:02 - 4:04Benedict Anderson,
a prominent sociologist, -
4:04 - 4:10called nation-states
“imaginary communities.” -
4:11 - 4:15On a historic scale, nation-states
are a relatively new phenomenon. -
4:15 - 4:18They appeared at the end
of the 18th century -
4:18 - 4:22in response to the challenges
of the First Industrial Revolution. -
4:22 - 4:27Governments needed
to direct and motivate people -
4:27 - 4:29by appealing to their national identity,
-
4:29 - 4:35to their awareness of a unique historic
destiny, a special national mission. -
4:35 - 4:40Suddenly, agendas of one piece of land
became more important to people -
4:40 - 4:44than agendas and the future
of the humanity combined. -
4:44 - 4:47Thus, it turns out that the countries
-
4:47 - 4:50that emerged as a response
to the First Industrial Revolution, -
4:50 - 4:53are pure egoists.
-
4:53 - 4:55Of course, one could always
find a rational explanation -
4:55 - 4:58of why countries act
in this particular manner. -
4:58 - 5:01But this only holds true
if we look at competition -
5:01 - 5:04as the only way to co-exist in the world.
-
5:04 - 5:07Time passed, this paradigm shifted,
-
5:07 - 5:10but nations remain as selfish
now as they were before. -
5:11 - 5:13What do I mean when I say
that nations are selfish? -
5:13 - 5:15Let’s figure it out together.
-
5:15 - 5:19I decided not to overwhelm
you with academic work -
5:19 - 5:21and scientific references,
-
5:21 - 5:23but instead take a glossy magazine,
-
5:23 - 5:26find an article, “Signs of your
partner being overly selfish,” -
5:26 - 5:29and check the nations
against those criteria. -
5:30 - 5:37After all, we are in relationship
with our governments, aren’t we? -
5:37 - 5:39Let’s see what came out
of this experiment. -
5:39 - 5:43Number one. Your partner
is self-centered. Hmm. -
5:43 - 5:46This reminds me a little bit
of the nation-states. -
5:46 - 5:50Nation-states are preoccupied
solely with their internal affairs. -
5:50 - 5:53They live from one
election cycle to another. -
5:53 - 5:57They compete with the other
countries for world domination. -
5:57 - 6:00In the meantime, we as humanity
are facing the kind of challenges -
6:00 - 6:04that no nation-state could
possibly resolve on its own. -
6:05 - 6:06What kind of challenges are there?
-
6:06 - 6:08We are talking about
the ecological crisis, -
6:08 - 6:13extinction of species
essential to our own survival, -
6:13 - 6:14pandemics,
-
6:14 - 6:16oceans full of plastic,
-
6:16 - 6:18contaminated air,
-
6:18 - 6:20lack of drinking water,
-
6:20 - 6:24political and climate migration.
-
6:25 - 6:29Meanwhile, we all still focus
only on our internal agendas. -
6:30 - 6:33It is important for us
to have good insight -
6:33 - 6:37not only into the local
but also into the global issues. -
6:37 - 6:38Ask yourselves
-
6:38 - 6:41how well you navigate
current global trends? -
6:41 - 6:45How good are your insights on issues
of global technological regulations? -
6:45 - 6:49Do you believe those people
who think climate change is a hoax? -
6:51 - 6:53And depending on your answer,
-
6:53 - 6:57the better you are aware
of those global issues, -
6:57 - 6:59the more difficult it is
to manipulate you. -
7:00 - 7:01Number two.
-
7:02 - 7:07Instead of discussing uneasy topics,
your partner keeps silent. -
7:07 - 7:10We, as citizens, do demand reforms
-
7:10 - 7:13that often remain ignored.
-
7:14 - 7:18We have no control over
the way our taxes are spent. -
7:19 - 7:23Not all governments have developed
a habit of consulting us, citizens, -
7:23 - 7:26when it comes to the decisions
-
7:26 - 7:30on important internal
and external policy matters. -
7:30 - 7:32Corporate and state media
-
7:32 - 7:36tend to manipulate public opinion
-
7:36 - 7:39in order to distract us
from what really matters. -
7:40 - 7:42We need to get much more involved
-
7:42 - 7:46in holding governments accountable.
-
7:46 - 7:48Governments are us.
-
7:48 - 7:51Let’s imagine that a country
runs as a business. -
7:51 - 7:54It has certain limited resources.
-
7:54 - 7:56It has a certain budget.
-
7:56 - 8:00I think that a government
must function as a CEO, -
8:00 - 8:04who is hired to effectively manage
the structure within the scope -
8:04 - 8:07of their responsibility
to maximize value for shareholders -
8:07 - 8:11in a healthy competition
of the market environment. -
8:11 - 8:14What happens if those
duties are not carried out? -
8:14 - 8:18Shareholders fire the CEO
-
8:18 - 8:20and hire a new person.
-
8:20 - 8:25Now look at how most governments
and even the United Nations work. -
8:25 - 8:27This kind of business would
go under water in no time. -
8:27 - 8:31Why do we allow ourselves
to have CEOs like that? -
8:31 - 8:32Where else would shareholders
-
8:32 - 8:36be so indifferent towards
their own businesses? -
8:37 - 8:40Who tolerates CEOs
-
8:40 - 8:43who while appealing
to patriotism and duty, -
8:43 - 8:47surround themselves with highly corrupt
-
8:47 - 8:49and extremely inefficient people?
-
8:49 - 8:53How long would such a CEO last?
-
8:53 - 8:55An interesting thing about business is
-
8:55 - 8:58that a general director
holds very limited power. -
8:58 - 9:02The same arrangement
could be applied to governments. -
9:02 - 9:06I am convinced that no person,
no single group of people -
9:06 - 9:10should hold absolute power.
-
9:10 - 9:14If you ask me about
possible alternative models, -
9:14 - 9:17I’d say governments for rent. Why not?
-
9:17 - 9:21Government as a service?
I’m certainly in favor. -
9:21 - 9:23Number three.
-
9:23 - 9:26Your partner criticizes you,
your friends, and your relatives. -
9:28 - 9:31This is the narrative that remains
with us from birth to death. -
9:31 - 9:34That makes us skeptical towards
-
9:34 - 9:35our neighbors
-
9:35 - 9:37and coalitions they are part of.
-
9:38 - 9:42They are bad. They are alien.
They are not like us. -
9:42 - 9:44Very convenient, isn’t it?
-
9:44 - 9:48This narrative used by nation-states
-
9:48 - 9:52does not contribute to
the development of global partnerships -
9:52 - 9:55and transnational good-neighborliness
-
9:55 - 9:59that could create a basis
of trust for uniting people -
9:59 - 10:02in addressing our common shared agendas.
-
10:02 - 10:07Why can’t our empathy
surpass a line on a map -
10:07 - 10:10or a boundary pillar stuck in the ground?
-
10:10 - 10:14Tell me, can nations not be selfish?
-
10:15 - 10:18Nations are us, people.
-
10:18 - 10:20Love other people.
-
10:20 - 10:22People who are not like you.
-
10:22 - 10:25People who are said to be savages, alien,
-
10:25 - 10:26and altogether strange,
-
10:26 - 10:29even those living next door.
-
10:29 - 10:31People we never sought to understand.
-
10:31 - 10:35People that your government
doesn’t want you to love. -
10:36 - 10:41All that must be done with
a high degree of priority, my friends. -
10:41 - 10:45We carry a responsibility
to future generations -
10:45 - 10:47and the world that
they will inherit from us. -
10:48 - 10:52Imagine you are flying
on a plane without a pilot -
10:52 - 10:55or traveling on an ocean liner
without a captain. -
10:55 - 10:58Will you continue
to have fun in first class -
10:58 - 11:01or will you unite and go up
to the captain’s deck -
11:01 - 11:02where the captain is missing?
-
11:02 - 11:06Will you continue relying on people
-
11:06 - 11:09who serve you drinks and play movies
-
11:09 - 11:13or will you get together
and solve the problem? -
11:13 - 11:15Because the problem is real.
-
11:15 - 11:18We keep hearing about
who has developed new weapons -
11:18 - 11:21and what new tariffs have been
imposed against another country. -
11:21 - 11:23But those are not the things that matter.
-
11:24 - 11:26One may certainly dismiss this and say,
-
11:26 - 11:27"That's nonsense.
-
11:27 - 11:30There is no alternative
to the nation-state system. -
11:30 - 11:35It is but an illusion, a utopia,
and is not worthy of attention." -
11:35 - 11:37But let’s think about all the innovations
-
11:37 - 11:40people managed to develop and implement.
-
11:40 - 11:44I believe that if we are capable
of such things in technology, -
11:44 - 11:48then it means that
we should also be capable -
11:48 - 11:50of similar breakthroughs
in political thought. -
11:51 - 11:55Try to support politicians
and opinion leaders -
11:55 - 11:59who promote the global agenda,
-
11:59 - 12:00who stand for openness.
-
12:00 - 12:02And I also ask you -
-
12:02 - 12:04there are many young people in the room -
-
12:04 - 12:06to become such politicians yourselves.
-
12:06 - 12:09Because such concepts
as “our sovereign model,” -
12:09 - 12:11“our unique traditions,”
-
12:11 - 12:12“our path,”
-
12:12 - 12:13“our world order”
-
12:13 - 12:15will be supported until the end
-
12:15 - 12:18by those who benefit the most
from preserving the status quo. -
12:19 - 12:20It would be naive
-
12:20 - 12:24to count on the politicians
to drive the change. -
12:24 - 12:27It is up to us to make the change happen.
-
12:28 - 12:30Please don’t get me wrong.
-
12:30 - 12:32I’m not calling for an overthrow
-
12:32 - 12:36of the constitutional order
or a take-over of government. -
12:36 - 12:39There is no need for any
forceful seizure of power. -
12:39 - 12:43We can gradually shift
towards a new paradigm -
12:43 - 12:48by doing something every day
that aligns with the global agenda. -
12:49 - 12:55We can’t invent the future
using yesterday’s tools. -
12:56 - 12:59Imagine you order an Uber,
and this car shows up. -
13:00 - 13:04You can be sure to get
a lot of Likes on Instagram, -
13:04 - 13:07but if you ask yourself
how convenient this is -
13:07 - 13:10and whether it satisfies
the needs of today, -
13:10 - 13:13you will know that this scenario
is very far from ideal. -
13:13 - 13:16But frankly, even this car is more modern
-
13:16 - 13:19than the idea of the nation-state.
-
13:19 - 13:22Why does everyone still accept
-
13:22 - 13:26that the majority of national elections
-
13:26 - 13:30result in something like this car,
only in the political domain? -
13:33 - 13:40If we take steps towards
a more globalized world, -
13:40 - 13:43we might see a different future.
-
13:43 - 13:47A future on higher levels of existence.
-
13:47 - 13:51A future in a united
and not a fragmented world. -
13:51 - 13:54A future which is
keeping up with the spirit -
13:54 - 13:57of the time we live in.
-
13:57 - 13:58Thank you.
-
13:58 - 14:01(Applause)
- Title:
- Can countries not be egoists? | Anastasia Kalinina | TEDxDvortsovayaSquare
- Description:
-
Anastasia will walk us through modern history and will raise several questions about modern politics. She is the head of Eurasia at the World Economic Forum, a former Global Leadership Fellow, and a member of the Global Shapers Community.
This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at https://www.ted.com/tedx
- Video Language:
- Russian
- Team:
- closed TED
- Project:
- TEDxTalks
- Duration:
- 14:07
Rhonda Jacobs approved English subtitles for Могут ли страны не быть эгоистами? | Анастасия Калинина | TEDxDvortsovayaSquare | ||
Rhonda Jacobs edited English subtitles for Могут ли страны не быть эгоистами? | Анастасия Калинина | TEDxDvortsovayaSquare | ||
Rhonda Jacobs edited English subtitles for Могут ли страны не быть эгоистами? | Анастасия Калинина | TEDxDvortsovayaSquare | ||
Rhonda Jacobs edited English subtitles for Могут ли страны не быть эгоистами? | Анастасия Калинина | TEDxDvortsovayaSquare | ||
Rhonda Jacobs edited English subtitles for Могут ли страны не быть эгоистами? | Анастасия Калинина | TEDxDvortsovayaSquare | ||
Retired user accepted English subtitles for Могут ли страны не быть эгоистами? | Анастасия Калинина | TEDxDvortsovayaSquare | ||
Retired user edited English subtitles for Могут ли страны не быть эгоистами? | Анастасия Калинина | TEDxDvortsovayaSquare | ||
Retired user edited English subtitles for Могут ли страны не быть эгоистами? | Анастасия Калинина | TEDxDvortsovayaSquare |