< Return to Video

Music, Mice & Mazes: David Merrell and His Famous Experiment

  • 0:09 - 0:12
    David Merell whose is a student
  • 0:12 - 0:16
    In Virginia and he did a experiment
  • 0:16 - 0:18
    we did an experiment and I just called it
  • 0:18 - 0:23
    in my own notes the destructive effect
  • 0:23 - 0:26
    of rock and the salutary of effect
  • 0:26 - 0:28
    of classical music and i think i will
  • 0:28 - 0:30
    just have David come up and explain to
  • 0:30 - 0:33
    you what he did and what his experiment
  • 0:33 - 0:35
    was and what it demonstrated
  • 0:35 - 0:39
    So David
  • 1:16 - 1:17
    David: Good Morning
  • 1:18 - 1:19
    First of all I Just like to say
  • 1:19 - 1:22
    thank you to Mrs. Ogdmen for inviting me
  • 1:22 - 1:24
    here to be able to speak to you this
  • 1:24 - 1:30
    morning and I would like to um say thank
  • 1:30 - 1:32
    you for the wonderful introduction as
  • 1:32 - 1:34
    he said my name is David Merell I'm a
  • 1:34 - 1:36
    Junior or senior at Nansemond River
  • 1:36 - 1:38
    High school and i received a lot of
  • 1:38 - 1:41
    recognition for this project which I'm
  • 1:41 - 1:45
    here today to tell you about
  • 1:45 - 1:48
    I Guess i can start off by
  • 1:48 - 2:01
    *inaudible Speaking from the crowd
  • 2:01 - 2:04
    David : Hows that Is that, is that better
  • 2:04 - 2:08
    Okay Alright As i said my name is
  • 2:08 - 2:11
    David Merrel and I' here to tell you about
  • 2:11 - 2:13
    an experiment that i received a lot of
  • 2:13 - 2:17
    recognition for. I have been brought up
  • 2:17 - 2:19
    In my family and my family has been
  • 2:19 - 2:22
    big on music they, they seen, what
  • 2:22 - 2:25
    you know the big effect that music can
  • 2:25 - 2:27
    have on the use of today and on society.
  • 2:28 - 2:30
    and they always brought me up teaching me
  • 2:30 - 2:34
    that heavy metal that sort of music
  • 2:34 - 2:36
    really isn't good for ya and that
  • 2:36 - 2:39
    classical music is something that is good
  • 2:39 - 2:42
    There's nothing bad about it and just to
  • 2:42 - 2:44
    In general realize just how powerful
  • 2:44 - 2:47
    music is and I have been doing research
  • 2:47 - 2:49
    and our family is , you know has books
  • 2:49 - 2:52
    and things like that about music
  • 2:52 - 2:54
    and one day we came across this research
  • 2:54 - 2:56
    that Michael Bowlen about how he used
  • 2:56 - 3:02
    music he used classical music and atonal
  • 3:02 - 3:05
    sounds on groups of mice and ran them
  • 3:05 - 3:07
    through a maze to see what, what the
  • 3:07 - 3:09
    effects would have on them and I said
  • 3:09 - 3:12
    that pretty neat, so I came up with a
  • 3:12 - 3:14
    project or devised a project that would
  • 3:14 - 3:17
    somewhat simulate a learning environment
  • 3:18 - 3:21
    for mice for what I did or the title of
  • 3:21 - 3:23
    the project is music mice amazes the
  • 3:23 - 3:24
    classic rock is growing that continues
  • 3:24 - 3:27
    this is a, this actually second year that
  • 3:27 - 3:30
    i have done this project
  • 3:30 - 3:33
    in this project my hypothesis was that.
  • 3:33 - 3:35
    Music would have an effect on the
  • 3:35 - 3:37
    learning abilities of white male mice
  • 3:37 - 3:39
    classical music will have a positive
  • 3:39 - 3:42
    effect whereas hardrock music will have
  • 3:42 - 3:45
    a negative effect and as I said this is
  • 3:45 - 3:48
    Second year I've done this project and the 1st year.
  • 3:48 - 3:50
    I did this project I obtained eighteen
  • 3:50 - 3:52
    white male mice from a local pet store.
  • 3:53 - 3:55
    and divided them into three different
  • 3:55 - 3:57
    groups. A hardrock group or heavy metal
  • 3:57 - 4:00
    group which would listen to Anthrax,
  • 4:00 - 4:04
    stunt 442 and at the time since we really
  • 4:04 - 4:06
    didnt know any good heavy metal groups we
  • 4:06 - 4:08
    just went to K-Mart and ask the clerk
  • 4:08 - 4:10
    behind the desk whats a good heavy metal
  • 4:10 - 4:13
    group and she handed us this CD and after
  • 4:13 - 4:15
    about ten seconds of listening to it
  • 4:15 - 4:17
    we found that's the one wanted
  • 4:17 - 4:19
    *crowd is laughing from David joke
  • 4:19 - 4:23
    Um we then ah, we also had a classical
  • 4:23 - 4:27
    group. Which we played a variety of different classical
  • 4:27 - 4:29
    songs to it, it didn't matter which ones
  • 4:29 - 4:31
    as long as it was classical. So we divided
  • 4:31 - 4:33
    this mice into three different groups
  • 4:33 - 4:35
    and we began running them through a fixed
  • 4:35 - 4:38
    maze over the course of the next four weeks
  • 4:38 - 4:41
    and as time progressed the mice either
  • 4:41 - 4:45
    got faster or slower and ah the classical
  • 4:45 - 4:48
    or I'll go into that later. But
  • 4:48 - 4:49
    the interesting thing about first year
  • 4:49 - 4:51
    I did this project is that actually I
  • 4:51 - 4:54
    had to cut it short because the heavy
  • 4:54 - 4:56
    music had made these mice who can't
  • 4:56 - 4:59
    understand words just the sounds alone
  • 4:59 - 5:02
    had made them so violent that within
  • 5:02 - 5:04
    three weeks there was only one mouse left
  • 5:04 - 5:05
    in the rock group
  • 5:05 - 5:06
    * crowd is laughing
  • 5:06 - 5:09
    It was rather interesting because
  • 5:09 - 5:12
    the mice they just they seem to be
  • 5:12 - 5:14
    so disconent with one another and
  • 5:14 - 5:17
    they would separate themselves from the
  • 5:17 - 5:20
    other mice and then you know they just
  • 5:20 - 5:22
    turn around and kill one of the other mice
  • 5:22 - 5:25
    For as the classical mice and controlled mice
  • 5:25 - 5:27
    they were perfectly fine with one another
  • 5:27 - 5:29
    They didn't have problems what so ever
  • 5:29 - 5:33
    it was, it was interesting and so my
  • 5:33 - 5:35
    after doing this project for my first
  • 5:35 - 5:37
    year. I had a lot of suggestion and found
  • 5:37 - 5:40
    out a lot problems with my project
  • 5:40 - 5:44
    This is a background of the project
  • 5:44 - 5:47
    which I just described and as I said
  • 5:47 - 5:49
    there a lot of problem with the project
  • 5:49 - 5:50
    there weren't enough subject for
  • 5:50 - 5:52
    statistical analysis. I'm sorry if you
  • 5:52 - 5:56
    can't see but were try more or less the
  • 5:56 - 5:59
    uh. Like I said there weren't enough mice
  • 5:59 - 6:02
    for statistical analysis i only had 18
  • 6:02 - 6:03
    mice that first year. So the second year
  • 6:03 - 6:07
    I did my project i had 72 also in the
  • 6:07 - 6:09
    first year like I said I obtained the mice
  • 6:09 - 6:12
    From a local pet store and I did know
  • 6:12 - 6:15
    what their age , their weight uh what
  • 6:15 - 6:17
    their genetic background was which had.
  • 6:17 - 6:19
    which could have an affect on the outcome
  • 6:19 - 6:21
    of the overall project
  • 6:21 - 6:24
    Their uh their living condition as
  • 6:24 - 6:26
    I would say was one of the big problems
  • 6:26 - 6:30
    They were able to interact with another
  • 6:30 - 6:31
    and they were also given a
  • 6:31 - 6:34
    very unrealistic music environment
  • 6:34 - 6:36
    The two variable groups which listen to
  • 6:36 - 6:41
    music as I said uh were subjective to
  • 6:41 - 6:45
    their music 24 hours a day at 90 decibels
  • 6:45 - 6:49
    and that's a little extreme its kinda loud
  • 6:49 - 6:52
    and its all day long and so i looked
  • 6:52 - 6:54
    at these problems and I decided that
  • 6:54 - 6:55
    it needed a lot of work
  • 6:56 - 7:01
    So what I did um was i obtained
  • 7:01 - 7:04
    the 72 white male mice I said but this
  • 7:04 - 7:06
    year I quoted them from
  • 7:06 - 7:08
    Harland Spray Darley which is a
  • 7:08 - 7:10
    laboratory which specializes in the use
  • 7:10 - 7:12
    of animals in uh research each mouse
  • 7:12 - 7:15
    each is mouse 4 to 5 weeks old
  • 7:15 - 7:20
    15 to 20 grams in weight and uh
  • 7:20 - 7:21
    and their all genetically
  • 7:21 - 7:23
    similar their all out friend mice
  • 7:23 - 7:26
    when I received the mice I put them
  • 7:26 - 7:28
    all to separate 5 gallon aquariums
  • 7:28 - 7:32
    thus eliminating the possibility of
  • 7:32 - 7:34
    um subject destruction
  • 7:34 - 7:36
    *crowd is laughing from joke
  • 7:36 - 7:38
    I, I also gave the each mouse a
  • 7:38 - 7:43
    ceratin amount of food light and water
  • 7:43 - 7:46
    The uh receives 12 hours of light and
  • 7:46 - 7:50
    music this year was kept 10 at hours a day
  • 7:50 - 7:53
    at 70 decibels which seem a little more
  • 7:53 - 7:56
    moderate than 24 hours a day at 90 decibels
  • 7:59 - 8:01
    the uh 72 mice which i had obtained from
  • 8:01 - 8:04
    Harland Spray Garley i dived into three
  • 8:04 - 8:06
    different groups again but this year
  • 8:06 - 8:08
    i had a small variation of that I
  • 8:08 - 8:10
    had the control group once again which
  • 8:10 - 8:12
    was suppose to simulate just how
  • 8:12 - 8:14
    much a regular mouse should learn .
  • 8:14 - 8:16
    the classical group this year
  • 8:16 - 8:19
    listen to mozart and i decide on mozart
  • 8:19 - 8:23
    because through the past year the
  • 8:23 - 8:25
    research i had done it seem that mozart
  • 8:25 - 8:27
    was used the most in other studies done
  • 8:27 - 8:30
    with in music and then I used once again
  • 8:30 - 8:31
    Used the anthrax Cd or the hard
  • 8:31 - 8:37
    rock group this is a picture of the
  • 8:37 - 8:42
    anthrax cd and it was probably the only
  • 8:42 - 8:44
    side of the cover that I can show was
  • 8:44 - 8:47
    decent I'm going to play a you a
  • 8:47 - 8:52
    very short excerpt from the cd um
  • 8:52 - 8:53
    if i made it lengthy i don't think
  • 8:53 - 8:55
    anybody would stay
  • 8:55 - 9:07
    *inaudible speaking from the crowd
  • 9:07 - 9:11
    *David putting the cd in the cd player
  • 9:11 - 9:21
    *anthrax is playing
  • 9:21 - 9:25
    *Crowd Laughs
  • 9:29 - 9:31
    * David switches to Classical music
  • 9:31 - 9:37
    *inaudible speaking from david
  • 10:15 - 11:07
    *Mozart is playing
  • 11:08 - 11:12
    That was probably much more pleasant
  • 11:13 - 11:14
    Upon arrival each mouse was
  • 11:14 - 11:17
    individually weighed in order to make
  • 11:17 - 11:19
    sure that they were healthy and
  • 11:19 - 11:21
    throughout the rest of project each
  • 11:21 - 11:23
    week the mice were weighed
  • 11:23 - 11:25
    in order to make sure they stayed
  • 11:25 - 11:27
    within the healrhy growth curve if the
  • 11:27 - 11:30
    mice were to suddenly drop in weight the
  • 11:30 - 11:32
    project would have to stop because
  • 11:32 - 11:35
    the indication of stress or sickness
  • 11:35 - 11:40
    caused by the music and this graph
  • 11:40 - 11:43
    gives you a, a color version I guess of
  • 11:43 - 11:46
    the growth curve of the mice the red
  • 11:46 - 11:49
    represent the hard rock or heavy metal
  • 11:49 - 11:51
    the green represent the control and the
  • 11:51 - 11:55
    blue represent the classical even though
  • 11:55 - 11:58
    it looks likes the hard rock makes a
  • 11:58 - 12:00
    drastic change from week 2 to 3
  • 12:00 - 12:05
    it still remain within the growth
  • 12:05 - 12:08
    curve what I did was upon arrival
  • 12:08 - 12:09
    caused I said the mice were
  • 12:09 - 12:11
    put into their individual cages
  • 12:11 - 12:12
    and then they were given a one week
  • 12:12 - 12:14
    period in which to acclimate to their
  • 12:14 - 12:16
    new environment this allowed the mice to
  • 12:16 - 12:17
    settle down and get comfortable with
  • 12:17 - 12:20
    with their, their surrounding after which
  • 12:20 - 12:23
    their run through a fixed maze three
  • 12:23 - 12:26
    times in order to get a base starting
  • 12:26 - 12:28
    time after they run through maze the
  • 12:28 - 12:31
    first time they were then subjected to
  • 12:31 - 12:35
    music the following week and then were run
  • 12:35 - 12:37
    through the maze another, additional
  • 12:37 - 12:39
    three times. I continued
  • 12:39 - 12:43
    to play the music for the next
  • 12:43 - 12:44
    four weeks and randomized through
  • 12:44 - 12:46
    the maze three times after each week
  • 12:46 - 12:54
    and by the first week they knew
  • 12:54 - 12:57
    the maze you know or they sort a got a
  • 12:57 - 12:59
    feel for it and then second week
  • 12:59 - 13:03
    and the third week that's a
  • 13:03 - 13:05
    little picture of the treat they got
  • 13:05 - 13:08
    at the end and the fourth week
  • 13:08 - 13:10
    by this time the a control and classical
  • 13:10 - 13:12
    knew it very well and the hard
  • 13:12 - 13:16
    rock I'd hate to say but did not.
  • 13:16 - 13:19
    This gives a, a data table of the
  • 13:19 - 13:21
    average run time in seconds as
  • 13:21 - 13:24
    well as the weights in grams the
  • 13:24 - 13:27
    week one at the top is the
  • 13:27 - 13:29
    baseline starting time the initial
  • 13:29 - 13:31
    one before the music had been started
  • 13:31 - 13:32
    and all three groups started out
  • 13:32 - 13:35
    pretty close to ten minutes.
  • 13:35 - 13:38
    Which about 590 seconds then
  • 13:38 - 13:39
    throughout the course of the week
  • 13:39 - 13:40
    the control group manage to get
  • 13:40 - 13:42
    their time down to 307 seconds
  • 13:42 - 13:45
    which is about and average of 5 minutes.
  • 13:45 - 13:47
    The classical group manages to get
  • 13:47 - 13:50
    their time all the way down to 106
  • 13:50 - 13:54
    seconds which is about a minute 46
  • 13:54 - 13:56
    so compared to the normal or average
  • 13:56 - 13:58
    mouse one that listen to classical is
  • 13:58 - 14:02
    above average . The hard rock mice
  • 14:02 - 14:05
    increase their time from 10 minutes
  • 14:05 - 14:09
    to 1825 seconds which is about
  • 14:09 - 14:10
    30 minutes and started having
  • 14:10 - 14:12
    problems with this actually
  • 14:12 - 14:14
    because during, while running the
  • 14:14 - 14:16
    control and classical while I did
  • 14:16 - 14:18
    this during uh early part of the school
  • 14:18 - 14:20
    year school it was fine because it take
  • 14:20 - 14:22
    me, you know two hours or
  • 14:22 - 14:25
    sometime to ten minutes you know
  • 14:25 - 14:26
    half and hour maybe tops doing for
  • 14:26 - 14:29
    all the mice for the classical but with
  • 14:29 - 14:30
    the hard rock by the end of the fourth
  • 14:30 - 14:32
    week it was taking take me 5 and a
  • 14:32 - 14:34
    half to 6 hours a day to run these
  • 14:34 - 14:39
    mice and it was, was getting rather
  • 14:39 - 14:40
    extreme
  • 14:40 - 14:42
    * crowd laughing
  • 14:42 - 14:46
    This give a,a graph of the run time
  • 14:46 - 14:48
    and at the left it shows that all
  • 14:48 - 14:50
    three groups started pretty much
  • 14:50 - 14:51
    at the same time. But then by the
  • 14:51 - 14:53
    time you progress through the week
  • 14:53 - 14:57
    the classical which is in blue decrease
  • 14:57 - 15:02
    their time by 8 and a half minutes
  • 15:02 - 15:05
    which is went up the control went
  • 15:05 - 15:08
    up slightly or cut off 5 minutes from
  • 15:08 - 15:11
    their time and the hard rock went
  • 15:11 - 15:14
    straight for the bottom they added 20
  • 15:14 - 15:16
    minutes to their time.
  • 15:19 - 15:23
    This gives a, a delta which is a
  • 15:23 - 15:25
    difference between weeks and it
  • 15:25 - 15:27
    just shows how much time they were
  • 15:27 - 15:31
    able to, able to cut from the previous
  • 15:31 - 15:36
    week and by week 4 to 1 it show the
  • 15:36 - 15:38
    number which I had just said that they
  • 15:38 - 15:41
    control mange to cut off 291 seconds
  • 15:41 - 15:44
    the classical 503 seconds and hard
  • 15:44 - 15:51
    rock had added 1256 seconds this give
  • 15:51 - 15:55
    a delta graph which is the data table
  • 15:55 - 15:58
    which I showed you but now its in a graph
  • 15:58 - 16:00
    and actually shows how the
  • 16:00 - 16:03
    control between week 1 and 2
  • 16:03 - 16:05
    actually did slightly better than the
  • 16:05 - 16:07
    classical but then between 2 and 3,
  • 16:07 - 16:09
    3 and 4 the classical seem to jump far
  • 16:09 - 16:14
    ahead. This give a overall graph of the
  • 16:14 - 16:17
    groups and it shows a real vivid picture
  • 16:17 - 16:19
    of just how drastics changes were between
  • 16:19 - 16:25
    the groups after accumulating all my data
  • 16:25 - 16:27
    which was actually 852 bits whereas the
  • 16:27 - 16:31
    year before as I mention 30 something
  • 16:32 - 16:35
    after i seen the data i took it to a
  • 16:35 - 16:39
    statistician whose was Dr. Mike Doveach
  • 16:39 - 16:41
    assistant professor of Mathematics and
  • 16:41 - 16:44
    statics at Old Dominion University.
  • 16:44 - 16:46
    and when I explained my project to him
  • 16:47 - 16:49
    and gave him the data he decided
  • 16:49 - 16:52
    to run three different test and he ran a
  • 16:52 - 16:53
    Manova test which useda a null
  • 16:53 - 16:56
    hypothesis, Anova test which looks
  • 16:56 - 16:58
    for statistical difference from week to
  • 16:58 - 17:00
    week and a Tukey studentized range
  • 17:00 - 17:02
    test the most importnat of these was the
  • 17:02 - 17:04
    Tukey studentized range test this looked
  • 17:04 - 17:08
    for a statistical significance difference
  • 17:08 - 17:11
    between one groups to see if you know.
  • 17:11 - 17:13
    If it was important enough to even
  • 17:13 - 17:17
    notice and a normal statistical,
  • 17:17 - 17:20
    statistically significant fact would
  • 17:20 - 17:23
    be to be a P of value of 0.1 and
  • 17:23 - 17:26
    after accumulating the data and
  • 17:26 - 17:30
    making the result we found that between
  • 17:30 - 17:32
    the classical and control this is from
  • 17:32 - 17:36
    week 4 to 1 there was a P Value of .01
  • 17:38 - 17:41
    we then ran out the number later and
  • 17:41 - 17:43
    found out it was even more significant
  • 17:43 - 17:45
    it went all the way out to P value of .001
  • 17:48 - 17:50
    The control to hard rock was as well
  • 17:50 - 17:51
    found to be significant or
  • 17:51 - 17:53
    statistically significant out of P value
  • 17:53 - 17:56
    of .01 it was as well, we as well
  • 17:56 - 17:59
    went further with that and found out that
  • 17:59 - 18:00
    it statically significant to a P value
  • 18:00 - 18:05
    of .0001.and the classical to hard
  • 18:05 - 18:08
    rock was as well statically significant
  • 18:08 - 18:11
    at a P Value .01 and extened to a P Value
  • 18:11 - 18:16
    0001. In conclusion I can say that
  • 18:16 - 18:19
    music does indeed have an effect
  • 18:19 - 18:21
    on the learning abilities on white male
  • 18:21 - 18:23
    mice. Classical music has a very
  • 18:23 - 18:26
    positive effect on the learning abilities
  • 18:26 - 18:28
    whereas the hard rock music has
  • 18:28 - 18:30
    a even greater negative effect on the
  • 18:30 - 18:33
    learning abilities and a side from the
  • 18:33 - 18:35
    fact which I have been able shown you
  • 18:35 - 18:39
    today. I can say from my own view
  • 18:39 - 18:41
    and my own opinion from observing
  • 18:41 - 18:46
    the mice that its, its seem to be not
  • 18:46 - 18:49
    only digress their ability to learn but
  • 18:49 - 18:51
    their ability to cope one with another
  • 18:51 - 18:55
    and in fact with the mice after the second
  • 18:55 - 18:57
    year of this doing their project as I
  • 18:57 - 18:59
    said i had keep them seperate this year
  • 18:59 - 19:01
    to try to eliminate the fighting after
  • 19:01 - 19:03
    the project i would take all the mice to a
  • 19:03 - 19:06
    local pet store to just get rid of them
  • 19:06 - 19:09
    and give them away and when I did this
  • 19:09 - 19:11
    with the classical and control mice
  • 19:11 - 19:12
    I would put them into a or
  • 19:12 - 19:14
    just one group at a time I'll
  • 19:14 - 19:15
    put them into two aquariums
  • 19:15 - 19:17
    and take them away thas 24 mice
  • 19:17 - 19:19
    in 20 gallons. and I thought that
  • 19:19 - 19:21
    wasn't that bad and it wasn't for
  • 19:21 - 19:24
    the classical and control they were fine
  • 19:24 - 19:26
    with one another .However when I put
  • 19:26 - 19:28
    the hardrock mice in there and within
  • 19:28 - 19:31
    an hour they had just begun fighting so
  • 19:31 - 19:33
    severely that i had to separate all the
  • 19:33 - 19:36
    mice and gave them about a week just
  • 19:36 - 19:38
    to you know chill out I guess you can say
  • 19:38 - 19:39
    crowds laughing
  • 19:39 - 19:41
    and sorta, sorta of calm down that
  • 19:41 - 19:44
    because I guess the music
  • 19:44 - 19:45
    had made them so uptight
  • 19:45 - 19:48
    and just you know had been putting
  • 19:48 - 19:50
    these bad messages into them. That they
  • 19:50 - 19:52
    couldn't handle one another and so I gave
  • 19:52 - 19:54
    them about a week just to calm down
  • 19:54 - 19:56
    and settle down and actually play a little
  • 19:56 - 19:58
    classical music to them and see if it
  • 19:58 - 20:01
    would reverse the effects so by, after
  • 20:01 - 20:03
    about a week or so you know i put
  • 20:03 - 20:05
    them back in and they were still a
  • 20:05 - 20:07
    little feisty but i magane to get them
  • 20:07 - 20:10
    to the store in time. It's just it been
  • 20:10 - 20:12
    an interesting project and i have
  • 20:12 - 20:14
    enjoyed doing it and enjoyed the
  • 20:14 - 20:16
    result i have found as well as the
  • 20:16 - 20:18
    research I've done and its too bad
  • 20:18 - 20:24
    that its not a subject that is widely i
  • 20:24 - 20:26
    guess you can say publicized as
  • 20:26 - 20:28
    it should be because there i found
  • 20:28 - 20:32
    multiple areas of research which are
  • 20:32 - 20:35
    extremely significant whether it how
  • 20:35 - 20:38
    the great effects of classical music on
  • 20:38 - 20:40
    preschooler learning the ABC's or
  • 20:40 - 20:43
    something like or whether its you know
  • 20:43 - 20:46
    just bad the moral of hard rock music and
  • 20:46 - 20:49
    something interesting is that these mice
  • 20:49 - 20:51
    could not understand the lyrics but the
  • 20:51 - 20:54
    music alone was bad enough much less the
  • 20:54 - 20:57
    lyrics which the people were subjected to
  • 20:57 - 20:59
    but the mice were not and that's
  • 20:59 - 21:01
    something that I think is pretty
  • 21:01 - 21:03
    significant as well.Once again i would
  • 21:03 - 21:05
    like to thank you for the opportunity
  • 21:05 - 21:08
    to be here to be able to present this
  • 21:08 - 21:09
    project to you.
  • 21:09 - 21:11
    Thank you
  • 21:11 - 21:15
    *crowd clapping
Title:
Music, Mice & Mazes: David Merrell and His Famous Experiment
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Duration:
21:17

English subtitles

Revisions