< Return to Video

Wave Interference

  • 0:01 - 0:03
    - [Voiceover] If two waves overlap
  • 0:03 - 0:05
    in the same medium, we say that
  • 0:05 - 0:07
    there's wave interference.
  • 0:07 - 0:10
    So this box here could represent a speaker
  • 0:10 - 0:12
    and this could be the
    sound wave it generates
  • 0:12 - 0:14
    or it could represent a
    laser and this would be
  • 0:14 - 0:16
    the light wave it generates or it could be
  • 0:16 - 0:19
    some sort of ripple
    tank generator and this
  • 0:19 - 0:21
    is the water wave it generates.
  • 0:21 - 0:23
    Regardless, if you had a second source
  • 0:23 - 0:26
    of a wave and these were to overlap,
  • 0:26 - 0:28
    you'd cause wave interference and what
  • 0:28 - 0:29
    that would look like would
    be something like this.
  • 0:29 - 0:32
    So let's say these are speakers.
  • 0:32 - 0:34
    I like thinking about
    it in terms of speakers,
  • 0:34 - 0:36
    I think it's easy to think about
  • 0:36 - 0:38
    and I put this speaker right next
  • 0:38 - 0:41
    to the first speaker, side-by-side.
  • 0:41 - 0:43
    So they'd be creating sound waves
  • 0:43 - 0:46
    in this region and I wouldn't really have
  • 0:46 - 0:48
    two sound waves necessarily.
  • 0:48 - 0:49
    You can think of it as just having
  • 0:49 - 0:52
    one total sound wave and how would we
  • 0:52 - 0:55
    find the size of that total sound wave?
  • 0:55 - 0:58
    Well if I put an axis in here.
  • 0:58 - 1:01
    The axis will make it
    easier to think about this.
  • 1:01 - 1:04
    I'm going to put an axis
    through here like this
  • 1:04 - 1:07
    What I can do is I can
    just ask myself this,
  • 1:07 - 1:10
    I'm going to say, what was the value
  • 1:10 - 1:12
    of the first wave, so I'm going
  • 1:12 - 1:13
    to take that value.
  • 1:13 - 1:15
    What was the value of second wave
  • 1:15 - 1:16
    and I'm just going to add them up.
  • 1:16 - 1:18
    To get the value of the total wave,
  • 1:18 - 1:21
    I'd take that value of the first wave
  • 1:21 - 1:22
    plus the value of the second wave
  • 1:22 - 1:25
    and well I'd just get double in this case.
  • 1:25 - 1:26
    I can come over to here okay.
  • 1:26 - 1:29
    The value here plus the value there,
  • 1:29 - 1:31
    I get double that point.
  • 1:31 - 1:32
    It's not going to be as high
  • 1:32 - 1:33
    because they weren't as high..
  • 1:33 - 1:36
    Then over here I got zero
    and zero is just zero.
  • 1:36 - 1:38
    and you start to see what's happening.
  • 1:38 - 1:41
    I can come down here very low
  • 1:41 - 1:43
    or very negative and I
    get double that down here
  • 1:43 - 1:45
    and if I were to trace this out,
  • 1:45 - 1:49
    what I would get is one
    big total sound wave
  • 1:49 - 1:51
    that would look like this.
  • 1:51 - 1:53
    So these have been amplified.
  • 1:53 - 1:54
    So that's one possibility.
  • 1:54 - 1:59
    When two waves overlap,
    you can get this case
  • 1:59 - 2:00
    where the peaks match the peaks
  • 2:00 - 2:03
    and the valleys match the valleys
  • 2:03 - 2:05
    and you get constructive interference.
  • 2:05 - 2:08
    So notice how each valley matches
  • 2:08 - 2:10
    the valley, each peak matches the peak
  • 2:10 - 2:15
    and this is called,
    Constructive Interference
  • 2:15 - 2:18
    because these constructively combine
  • 2:18 - 2:20
    to form one bigger wave.
  • 2:20 - 2:23
    So this is Constructive Interference.
  • 2:23 - 2:24
    So what would you hear?
  • 2:24 - 2:27
    If your ear was over here somewhere
  • 2:27 - 2:30
    waiting to hear this sound.
  • 2:31 - 2:33
    What you'd actually hear is a loud note.
  • 2:33 - 2:35
    This would be much louder than it was.
  • 2:35 - 2:37
    It would be twice as loud in fact.
  • 2:37 - 2:38
    Which makes sense.
  • 2:38 - 2:39
    You've got a second speaker in here.
  • 2:39 - 2:41
    It's twice as loud.
  • 2:41 - 2:42
    That makes sense.
  • 2:42 - 2:44
    What's a little bit harder to understand
  • 2:44 - 2:46
    is you can also have something called,
  • 2:46 - 2:47
    Destructive Interference.
  • 2:47 - 2:49
    What would that look like?
  • 2:49 - 2:52
    Well, imagine you had two speakers
  • 2:52 - 2:55
    but they looked like this so that the peak
  • 2:55 - 2:57
    of the first one lined
    up not with the peak
  • 2:57 - 2:59
    of the second one but with the valley
  • 2:59 - 3:01
    of the second one and the valley of
  • 3:01 - 3:03
    the first one lined up with the peak
  • 3:03 - 3:05
    of the second one.
  • 3:05 - 3:07
    These are out of phase we say.
  • 3:07 - 3:09
    Before, when they looked like this.
  • 3:09 - 3:12
    These waves we say are in phase,
  • 3:12 - 3:13
    because they look identical.
  • 3:13 - 3:15
    The peaks match up with the peaks.
  • 3:15 - 3:17
    The valleys with the valleys.
  • 3:17 - 3:18
    These are out of phase.
  • 3:18 - 3:20
    How far out of phase are they?
  • 3:20 - 3:25
    We say that these are
    180 degrees out of phase.
  • 3:25 - 3:29
    So these are 180 degrees out of phase.
  • 3:29 - 3:31
    The phase refers to what point on
  • 3:31 - 3:35
    the wave cycle is the wave at
  • 3:35 - 3:38
    and these two are starting
    completely separately
  • 3:38 - 3:39
    which is 180 degrees.
  • 3:39 - 3:41
    You might think that means 360
  • 3:41 - 3:42
    but think about it.
  • 3:42 - 3:44
    If you turn around 360 degrees,
  • 3:44 - 3:45
    you're actually back where you started.
  • 3:45 - 3:48
    If we tried to make these 360 degrees
  • 3:48 - 3:50
    out of phase, they'd look identical again
  • 3:50 - 3:53
    because I've moved on
    so far through a cycle
  • 3:53 - 3:54
    that's it's back to where it started
  • 3:54 - 3:55
    in the first place.
  • 3:55 - 3:57
    So I want to move it 180
    degrees out of phase.
  • 3:57 - 4:00
    That's exactly the opposite
  • 4:00 - 4:02
    So that you get peak lining up with valley
  • 4:02 - 4:04
    or if you like radions, this is called
  • 4:04 - 4:07
    pi out of phase because pi and 180
  • 4:07 - 4:09
    are the same angle.
  • 4:09 - 4:10
    Alright so what happens here
  • 4:10 - 4:13
    if I take these two speakers?
  • 4:13 - 4:15
    I'm going to take this second speaker
  • 4:15 - 4:18
    and I line it up right
    next to the first speaker.
  • 4:18 - 4:21
    I get something that looks more like this.
  • 4:21 - 4:22
    Look at how weird this looks.
  • 4:22 - 4:23
    These are completely out of phase
  • 4:23 - 4:24
    and what's going to happen is
  • 4:24 - 4:28
    if I add my little axis to
    help me think about this.
  • 4:28 - 4:31
    I'm going to add an axis
    straight through here.
  • 4:31 - 4:32
    Now I play the same game.
  • 4:32 - 4:35
    What total wave do I end up with?
  • 4:35 - 4:37
    Well, I take this value.
  • 4:37 - 4:39
    I'm going to add up the
    values just the same.
  • 4:39 - 4:40
    I take the value of the first wave
  • 4:40 - 4:42
    plus the value of the second wave.
  • 4:42 - 4:43
    I add those up, one's a positive
  • 4:43 - 4:46
    and one's a negative I get zero
  • 4:46 - 4:49
    and then over here zero plus zero is zero
  • 4:49 - 4:52
    and then the valley of the first wave
  • 4:52 - 4:54
    is lining up with the
    peak of the second wave
  • 4:54 - 4:56
    and if I add these two points up,
  • 4:56 - 4:58
    I get zero again and you probably see
  • 4:58 - 4:59
    what's going to happen.
  • 4:59 - 5:01
    I'm just going to get a flat line.
  • 5:01 - 5:04
    I'm going to get a flat line and I'm
  • 5:04 - 5:06
    going to get no wave at all.
  • 5:06 - 5:10
    These two waves cancel and so we call this
  • 5:10 - 5:11
    not Constructive Interference
  • 5:11 - 5:15
    but Destructive Interference
    because these have
  • 5:15 - 5:19
    destructively combined
    to form no wave at all
  • 5:19 - 5:20
    and this is a little strange.
  • 5:20 - 5:23
    How can two waves form no wave?
  • 5:23 - 5:26
    Well, this is how you do it.
  • 5:26 - 5:28
    And what would our ear here if we had
  • 5:28 - 5:30
    our ear over in this area again,
  • 5:30 - 5:31
    and we were listening.
  • 5:31 - 5:34
    If I just had one
    speaker, I'd hear a noise.
  • 5:34 - 5:35
    If I just had the second speaker,
  • 5:35 - 5:37
    I'd hear a noise.
  • 5:37 - 5:38
    If I have both the first and second
  • 5:38 - 5:42
    speaker together, I don't hear anything.
  • 5:42 - 5:45
    It's silent, which is hard
    to believe but this works.
  • 5:45 - 5:46
    In fact, this is how noise canceling
  • 5:46 - 5:49
    headphones work if you take a signal
  • 5:49 - 5:51
    from the outside and you send in
  • 5:51 - 5:55
    the exact same signal but flipped.
  • 5:55 - 5:58
    Pi out of phase or 180
    degrees out of phase.
  • 5:58 - 6:01
    It cancels it and so you can fight noise
  • 6:01 - 6:04
    with more noise but exactly out of phase
  • 6:04 - 6:06
    and you get silence in here, or at least
  • 6:06 - 6:08
    you can get close to it.
  • 6:08 - 6:10
    Now you might be wondering how do we
  • 6:10 - 6:13
    get a speaker to go 180
    degrees out of phase?
  • 6:13 - 6:14
    Well it's not too hard.
  • 6:14 - 6:16
    If you look at the back of these speakers.
  • 6:16 - 6:18
    Let me make a clean view.
  • 6:18 - 6:19
    If you look at the back of these speakers,
  • 6:19 - 6:21
    there will be a positive terminal
  • 6:21 - 6:23
    and a negative terminal or at lease inside
  • 6:23 - 6:25
    there will be and if you can swap
  • 6:25 - 6:28
    the positive terminal
    for the negative terminal
  • 6:28 - 6:30
    and the negative terminal
    for the positive terminal,
  • 6:30 - 6:34
    then when one speaker's
    trying to push air forward,
  • 6:34 - 6:36
    there's a diaphragm on this speaker
  • 6:36 - 6:38
    moving forward and backwards.
  • 6:38 - 6:40
    When one speaker is
    trying to push air forward
  • 6:40 - 6:41
    the other speaker will be trying
  • 6:41 - 6:43
    to pull air backwards and the net result
  • 6:43 - 6:45
    is that the air just doesn't move
  • 6:45 - 6:47
    because it's got equal and opposite
  • 6:47 - 6:50
    forces on it and since
    the air just sits there,
  • 6:50 - 6:51
    you've got no sound wave because
  • 6:51 - 6:53
    air has to oscillate
    to create a sound wave
  • 6:53 - 6:55
    and you get Disruptive Interference.
  • 6:55 - 6:57
    So that's how you can create a speaker
  • 6:57 - 6:59
    pi out of phase.
  • 6:59 - 7:00
    You might be wondering, I don't want
  • 7:00 - 7:02
    to mess with the wires on the back
  • 7:02 - 7:03
    of my speaker in fact, you shouldn't
  • 7:03 - 7:06
    so you don't get shocked but if I've got
  • 7:06 - 7:08
    two speakers in phase
    like this, I'm stuck,
  • 7:08 - 7:11
    I can't get Destructive Interference
  • 7:11 - 7:13
    but yeah you can.
  • 7:13 - 7:14
    Even if you don't mess with the wires,
  • 7:14 - 7:16
    and don't, don't try this at home,
  • 7:16 - 7:18
    you can still take this speaker,
  • 7:18 - 7:21
    remember before when these where
  • 7:21 - 7:23
    in phase we'd just line them up like that,
  • 7:23 - 7:25
    Constructive Interference but I don't
  • 7:25 - 7:27
    have to put them side-by-side.
  • 7:27 - 7:29
    I can start one speaker
    a little bit forward
  • 7:29 - 7:30
    and looks what happens.
  • 7:30 - 7:33
    We start to get waves
    that are out of phase.
  • 7:33 - 7:36
    So my question is how far forward
  • 7:36 - 7:38
    should I move this speaker to get
  • 7:38 - 7:40
    Destructive Interference
    and we can just watch.
  • 7:40 - 7:44
    So I'm just going to try
    this and when we get to
  • 7:44 - 7:48
    this point there, now we're out of phase.
  • 7:48 - 7:50
    Now I have Destructive Interference
  • 7:50 - 7:54
    and so how far did I
    move my speaker forward?
  • 7:54 - 7:57
    If we look at it, here was the front
  • 7:57 - 7:59
    of the speaker originally, right there.
  • 7:59 - 8:01
    Here's the front of the speaker now.
  • 8:01 - 8:03
    If you look at this wave, how much
  • 8:03 - 8:06
    of a wavelength have I moved forward.
  • 8:06 - 8:08
    The amount of wavelength that you had
  • 8:08 - 8:11
    to move forward was 1/2 of a wavelength.
  • 8:11 - 8:13
    So if you take two speakers that are
  • 8:13 - 8:15
    in phase and you move one
  • 8:15 - 8:18
    1/2 a wavelength forward you get
  • 8:18 - 8:19
    Destructive Interference again.
  • 8:19 - 8:22
    Again, if my ear's over here, I'm not
  • 8:22 - 8:23
    going to hear anything.
  • 8:23 - 8:25
    Even though these two waves started off
  • 8:25 - 8:27
    in phase, move one 1/2
    a wavelength forward,
  • 8:27 - 8:29
    they line up so that it's Destructive,
  • 8:29 - 8:33
    I get no noise but if I take this away.
  • 8:33 - 8:35
    We go back to the beginning here.
  • 8:35 - 8:37
    Take my speaker, we start over.
  • 8:37 - 8:40
    If you move it forward a whole wavelength,
  • 8:40 - 8:42
    so I take this here, keep moving it,
  • 8:42 - 8:44
    keep moving it and then
    Destructive Interference
  • 8:44 - 8:48
    Whoa, here we go, Constructive
    Interference again.
  • 8:48 - 8:50
    That's a whole wavelength.
  • 8:50 - 8:53
    So if you move it forward
    a whole wavelength.
  • 8:53 - 8:57
    Look, there's one whole
    wavelength forward.
  • 8:57 - 8:58
    So the front of the speaker was here
  • 8:58 - 9:00
    now the front of the speaker's here.
  • 9:00 - 9:03
    This is an entire wavelength.
  • 9:03 - 9:05
    I get Constructive Interference.
  • 9:05 - 9:07
    Now I'm going to hear a loud sound again.
  • 9:07 - 9:08
    I'm going to hear twice the noise
  • 9:08 - 9:11
    that there would be if
    I just had one speaker.
  • 9:11 - 9:13
    So the moral of this story is that
  • 9:13 - 9:15
    even if you have speakers
    that are in phase,
  • 9:15 - 9:17
    you can get Destructive Interference
  • 9:17 - 9:20
    depending on the difference in the length
  • 9:20 - 9:21
    that these two waves travel.
  • 9:21 - 9:25
    In other words wave two
    is traveling this far
  • 9:25 - 9:26
    to get to my ear.
  • 9:26 - 9:28
    I'm going to call that x2 and wave one
  • 9:28 - 9:31
    is traveling this far to get to my ear.
  • 9:31 - 9:32
    I'm going to call that x1.
  • 9:32 - 9:34
    If I took the difference
    between these two,
  • 9:34 - 9:37
    I'd be finding the path length difference.
  • 9:37 - 9:39
    The difference in path lengths that
  • 9:39 - 9:40
    these waves are traveling and that
  • 9:40 - 9:42
    would be this amount.
  • 9:42 - 9:43
    This is the difference right here.
  • 9:43 - 9:45
    I'm going to call it delta x because
  • 9:45 - 9:47
    it's the magnitude of the difference
  • 9:47 - 9:49
    between these two lengths and we saw
  • 9:49 - 9:53
    that if this equals
    lambda it was constructive
  • 9:53 - 9:55
    and if it equaled a 1/2 a lambda
  • 9:55 - 9:58
    it was destructive but those
    aren't the only values.
  • 9:58 - 10:00
    We can write down an
    important result here.
  • 10:00 - 10:04
    If delta x, the path length difference was
  • 10:04 - 10:07
    lambda or it turns out 2 lambda will work
  • 10:07 - 10:10
    or 3 lambda, imagine
    moving the second speaker
  • 10:10 - 10:13
    one more whole wavelength.
  • 10:13 - 10:16
    Well, you'd be perfectly
    back in phase again
  • 10:16 - 10:18
    because you'd align back up perfectly
  • 10:18 - 10:21
    or 3 whole wavelengths
    again, perfectly in phase.
  • 10:21 - 10:25
    Any integer wavelength including zero
  • 10:25 - 10:27
    because zero is just the case where
  • 10:27 - 10:29
    the speaker was right next to speaker one.
  • 10:29 - 10:31
    Where these two speakers were lined up
  • 10:31 - 10:33
    right next to each other,
  • 10:33 - 10:35
    you'll get Constructive Interference.
  • 10:35 - 10:38
    The waves line up perfectly,
    it's going to be constructive
  • 10:38 - 10:43
    and we saw if, delta x
    equals a 1/2 wavelength
  • 10:43 - 10:46
    it was destructive but
    that's not the only case.
  • 10:46 - 10:49
    Any odd 1/2 integer here.
  • 10:49 - 10:51
    So I can't do 2 over 2 because that
  • 10:51 - 10:52
    would be lambda again.
  • 10:52 - 10:57
    I could do 3 lambda over
    2 or 5 lambda over 2
  • 10:57 - 11:00
    or 7 lambda over 2.
  • 11:00 - 11:02
    Any of these will give me
    Destructive Interference
  • 11:02 - 11:05
    because they'll cause these peaks
  • 11:05 - 11:06
    to match up with valleys.
  • 11:06 - 11:08
    The whole thing would flat line.
  • 11:08 - 11:09
    I'd get no sound.
  • 11:09 - 11:11
    This is an important result.
  • 11:11 - 11:12
    If you've got two speakers that are
  • 11:12 - 11:15
    starting off in phase.
  • 11:15 - 11:17
    In other words they both
    start off the same way
  • 11:17 - 11:19
    and by that I mean one speaker sends out
  • 11:19 - 11:24
    it's wave going up, the other
  • 11:24 - 11:25
    sends out it's wave going up.
  • 11:25 - 11:27
    There both at the same cycle.
  • 11:27 - 11:30
    If the only difference is
    the path length difference,
  • 11:30 - 11:32
    this is an important result that let's you
  • 11:32 - 11:33
    determine whether there's constructive
  • 11:33 - 11:37
    or destructive interference
    but you might ask,
  • 11:37 - 11:39
    hold on, what if...
  • 11:39 - 11:41
    See this was assuming there was no phase
  • 11:41 - 11:42
    difference to start off with.
  • 11:42 - 11:44
    What if you did the old switcheroo
  • 11:44 - 11:46
    on the back of one of these speakers
  • 11:46 - 11:48
    and you swapped the positive end
  • 11:48 - 11:50
    for the negative end so
    instead of coming out
  • 11:50 - 11:55
    upward, the second one
    was coming out downward.
  • 11:55 - 11:56
    Then what would happen?
  • 11:56 - 11:58
    Well you might be able to guess.
  • 11:58 - 12:01
    Now, this results just going to flip-flop.
  • 12:01 - 12:05
    In other words, if I
    look at this case here
  • 12:05 - 12:07
    Look at, now we start off with speakers
  • 12:07 - 12:10
    that are out of phase to begin with.
  • 12:10 - 12:13
    This time, if I start off with zero
  • 12:13 - 12:15
    path length difference, I get destructive
  • 12:15 - 12:17
    destructive instead of constructive.
  • 12:17 - 12:20
    If I move this a whole wavelength forward,
  • 12:20 - 12:21
    there's a whole wavelength,
  • 12:21 - 12:23
    I get destructive again.
  • 12:23 - 12:26
    Two wavelengths forward,
    destructive again.
  • 12:26 - 12:27
    Three wavelengths forward would be
  • 12:27 - 12:29
    destructive again and so
    the integer wavelength
  • 12:29 - 12:32
    this time are going to
    give me destructive.
  • 12:32 - 12:33
    What about the half integers?
  • 12:33 - 12:35
    Let's see, I'll go forward
    a 1/2 a wavelength.
  • 12:35 - 12:38
    Look at this, perfectly in phase.
  • 12:38 - 12:39
    It's going to be constructive.
  • 12:39 - 12:43
    How about if I go 3 1/2 of a wavelength.
  • 12:43 - 12:46
    Again, perfectly in phase, constructive.
  • 12:46 - 12:50
    So, in this case it turns
    out if you start off
  • 12:50 - 12:52
    with speakers that were
    already phase shifted.
  • 12:52 - 12:57
    If one speaker is pi
    shifted from the other
  • 12:57 - 12:59
    then we got another result here.
  • 12:59 - 13:00
    We've got that...
  • 13:00 - 13:01
    Well actually I'll just go back to my
  • 13:01 - 13:03
    previous result, it's easier.
  • 13:03 - 13:07
    We can just add a little addendum here if
  • 13:07 - 13:12
    if one speaker is pi phase shifted,
  • 13:16 - 13:20
    from the other speaker and remember
  • 13:20 - 13:23
    these don't have to be speakers.
  • 13:23 - 13:25
    They could be any wave source.
  • 13:25 - 13:27
    If one speaker's a pi phase shift
  • 13:27 - 13:32
    from the other speaker then
    you just flip-flop this.
  • 13:32 - 13:34
    Then you just take this rule and now
  • 13:34 - 13:39
    these give you constructive right here.
  • 13:39 - 13:41
    These would give you constructive
  • 13:41 - 13:45
    and these up here would
    give you destructive
  • 13:45 - 13:46
    and so the whole thing just gives you
  • 13:46 - 13:49
    the opposite result.
  • 13:49 - 13:51
    Now the whole integer
    wavelengths give you destructive.
  • 13:51 - 13:54
    The 1/2 integer wavelengths
    give you constructive
  • 13:54 - 13:57
    and I have to impress upon you the idea
  • 13:57 - 13:59
    that this does not just
    apply for speakers.
  • 13:59 - 14:02
    This applies for light and some sort of
  • 14:02 - 14:04
    double slit experiment or light in
  • 14:04 - 14:06
    a thin film experiment or sound
  • 14:06 - 14:09
    with speakers or water waves.
  • 14:09 - 14:11
    Any time that's the case, this rule holds
  • 14:11 - 14:13
    in fact, this is the fundamental rule
  • 14:13 - 14:17
    for almost all wave interference aspects.
  • 14:17 - 14:18
    Is that the path length difference
  • 14:18 - 14:21
    along with whether
    there's a pi phase shift,
  • 14:21 - 14:24
    a relative pi phase shift between the two
  • 14:24 - 14:25
    will determine whether you get
  • 14:25 - 14:29
    constructive or destructive interference.
Title:
Wave Interference
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English, British
Duration:
14:29
Amara Bot edited English subtitles for Wave Interference

English subtitles

Revisions