< Return to Video

Re: Visual Multiplication and 48/2(9+3)

  • 0:00 - 0:03
    While I'm working on some more ambitious projects, I wanted to quickly comment
  • 0:03 - 0:06
    on a couple 'mathy' things that have been floathing around the internet
  • 0:06 - 0:07
    just so you know I'm still alive.
  • 0:07 - 0:11
    So there's this video that's been floathing around about how to multiply visually like this:
  • 0:11 - 0:15
    Pick two numbers, let's say: 12 times 31...and then you draw these lines:
  • 0:15 - 0:19
    one, two...three, one. Then you start counting the intersections.
  • 0:19 - 0:23
    One, two, three on the left. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven in the middle.
  • 0:23 - 0:24
    One, two on the right.
  • 0:24 - 0:27
    Put them together: three-seven-two. There's your answer. Magic, right?
  • 0:27 - 0:30
    But one of the delightful things about mathematics is that
  • 0:30 - 0:31
    there's often more than one way to solve a problem
  • 0:31 - 0:33
    and sometimes these methods look entirely different
  • 0:33 - 0:37
    but because they do the same thing they must be connected somehow
  • 0:37 - 0:39
    and in this case, there're not so different at all.
  • 0:39 - 0:42
    Let me demonstrate this visual method again.
  • 0:42 - 0:44
    This time let's do 97 times 86.
  • 0:44 - 0:49
    So we draw our nine lines and seven lines times eight lines and six lines.
  • 0:49 - 0:51
    Now all we have to do is count the intersections.
  • 0:51 - 0:55
    One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten... Okay wait!
  • 0:55 - 0:56
    This is boring!
  • 0:56 - 0:57
    How about instead of counting all the dots
  • 0:57 - 0:59
    we just figure out how many intersections there are.
  • 0:59 - 1:02
    Let's see: there's seven going one way and six going the other.
  • 1:02 - 1:05
    Hey, that's just six times seven which is...Huh!
  • 1:05 - 1:09
    Forget everything I ever said about learning a certain amount of memorization in mathematics being useful
  • 1:09 - 1:11
    at least at an elementary school level,
  • 1:11 - 1:14
    because apparently I've been faking my way through being a mathematician
  • 1:14 - 1:16
    without having memorized six times seven
  • 1:16 - 1:19
    and now I'm going to have to figure out five times seven
  • 1:19 - 1:26
    which is... [mumbling] ...so that's 35 and then add the sixth 7 to get 42.
  • 1:26 - 1:27
    Wow! I really should have known that one.
  • 1:27 - 1:32
    Okay, but the point is that this method breaks down the 'two digit' multiplication problem
  • 1:32 - 1:34
    into four 'one digit' multiplication problems
  • 1:34 - 1:37
    and if you do have your multiplication table memorized
  • 1:37 - 1:39
    you can easily figure out the answers.
  • 1:39 - 1:43
    And just like these three numbers became the ones, tens, and hundreds place
  • 1:43 - 1:47
    of the answer, these do to. Ones. Tens. Hundreds.
  • 1:47 - 1:49
    You add them all up and: voilá!
  • 1:49 - 1:52
    Which is exactly the same kind of breaking down into single digit multiplication
  • 1:52 - 1:55
    and adding that you do doing the old boring method.
  • 1:55 - 1:57
    The whole point is just to multiply every pair of digits,
  • 1:57 - 1:59
    make sure you've got the proper number of zeros on the end,
  • 1:59 - 2:03
    and add them all up. But of course seeing what you're actually doing is
  • 2:03 - 2:06
    multiplying every possible pair is not something your teachers want you to realize
  • 2:06 - 2:08
    or else you might remember the 'every combinations' concept
  • 2:08 - 2:11
    when you get to multiplying binomials and it might make it too easy.
  • 2:11 - 2:16
    In the end, all of these methods of multiplication distract from what multiplication really is.
  • 2:16 - 2:18
    Which for 12 times 31, is this.
  • 2:18 - 2:21
    All the rest is just breaking it down into well organized chunks
  • 2:21 - 2:26
    Saying, well: 10 times 30 is this. 10 times 1 is this. 30 times 2 is that.
  • 2:26 - 2:29
    And 2 times 1 is that. Add them all up, and you get the total area.
  • 2:29 - 2:32
    Don't let notation get in the way of your understanding.
  • 2:32 - 2:34
    Speaking of notation...
  • 2:34 - 2:37
    This infuriating bit of nonsense has been circulating around recently.
  • 2:37 - 2:39
    And that there has been so much discussion of it is a sign
  • 2:39 - 2:42
    that we've been trained to care about notation way too much.
  • 2:42 - 2:44
    Do you multiply here first? Or divide here first?
  • 2:44 - 2:48
    The answer is that: This is a badly formed sentence.
  • 2:48 - 2:51
    It's like saying: "I would like some juice or water with ice."
  • 2:51 - 2:54
    Do you mean you'd like either juice with no ice? Or water with ice?
  • 2:54 - 2:57
    Or do you mean that you'd like either juice with ice or water with ice?
  • 2:57 - 3:00
    You can make claims about conventions of what's right or wrong
  • 3:00 - 3:02
    but really the burden is on the author of the sentence
  • 3:02 - 3:04
    to put in some commas and make things clear.
  • 3:04 - 3:07
    Mathematicians do this by adding parentheses
  • 3:07 - 3:08
    and avoiding this divided by sign.
  • 3:09 - 3:11
    Math is not marks on a page.
  • 3:12 - 3:14
    The mathematics is in what those marks represent.
  • 3:14 - 3:16
    You can make up any rules you want about stuff
  • 3:16 - 3:18
    as long as you're consistent with them.
  • 3:18 -
    The end.
Title:
Re: Visual Multiplication and 48/2(9+3)
Description:

A quick response to some mathy things going around.

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Duration:
03:19
Retired user added a translation

English subtitles

Revisions