< Return to Video

StrucciWatch: Sorry to Bother You Review *re-upload*

  • 0:00 - 0:01
    It's wonderful
  • 0:01 - 0:01
    when you get to have the
  • 0:01 - 0:03
    privilege of experiencing art
  • 0:03 - 0:06
    that is so unapologetically itself!
  • 0:06 - 0:08
    And wonderful to watch the dawning of
  • 0:08 - 0:11
    a new, powerful, wholly original voice
  • 0:11 - 0:13
    in American filmmaking.
  • 0:13 - 0:15
    If you wanna have that kind of experience today,
  • 0:15 - 0:18
    you should go out and buy a ticket for Sorry to Bother You.
  • 0:18 - 0:23
    There's a precarity inherent to filmmaking,
    especially when we're talking about more
  • 0:23 - 0:28
    experimental or unconventional filmmaking,
    where there's so many elements that have to align
  • 0:28 - 0:31
    for a movie to be this good,
    and work this well,
  • 0:31 - 0:34
    while also retaining so much honesty
    and so much weirdness.
  • 0:35 - 0:39
    A lot of films with this strong of an ideological push
    and with this sort of message
  • 0:39 - 0:43
    try to coast on it and go for easy jokes,
    or an easy stock narrative;
  • 0:43 - 0:46
    or refuse to indict anyone except for a central villain.
  • 0:46 - 0:50
    This film does not take any of those
    well-worn paths.
  • 0:50 - 0:53
    Like, don't read about this movie's plot.
  • 0:53 - 0:55
    A black man goes to work
    for a telemarketing company.
  • 0:55 - 0:57
    " - You were a telemarketer years ago;
    - Oh, yeah.
  • 0:57 - 0:59
    - what did you draw from that, I'd like to hear the
    - Oh, yeah.
  • 0:59 - 1:02
    - pitch you give as a telemarketer.
    - Well I sat in my cubicle and
  • 1:02 - 1:04
    vowed revenge, and so, this is part of it."
  • 1:04 - 1:07
    "I like to tell stories about...
  • 1:08 - 1:11
    folks in jobs that we take for granted.
  • 1:12 - 1:19
    And about how those worlds have
    the same amount of drama
  • 1:19 - 1:22
    and the same amount of adventure
  • 1:23 - 1:28
    as other worlds that we
    glamourize in film."
  • 1:28 - 1:32
    And feels pressured to affect a "white voice"
    in order to succeed there.
  • 1:32 - 1:35
    "There is no white voice.
    All of this stuff that we're doing
  • 1:35 - 1:41
    is a performance of some sort.
    And the mythical idea of the white voice
  • 1:41 - 1:45
    is this one where there are no problems –
    where you got your bills paid,
  • 1:45 - 1:49
    you never get fired you just get laid off.
    And that's like
  • 1:49 - 1:55
    the performance of whiteness for some folks
    is like <
  • 1:55 - 1:56
    I'm middle class.>>
    - (chuckles) yeah.
  • 1:57 - 2:04
    That sort of a thing that is almost the
    opposite of the racist tropes of black folks
  • 2:04 - 2:10
    which are that we're savage and
    all our problems – our poverty
  • 2:10 - 2:15
    comes from bad choices that we make.
    So the opposite of that
  • 2:15 - 2:17
    - is this mythical white voice we
    - Right.
  • 2:17 - 2:21
    sometimes have to put on, in order to survive."
  • 2:21 - 2:24
    That's the basic premise.
    That's all you need to know.
  • 2:24 - 2:28
    This movie is wild and my experience
    would have been diminished
  • 2:28 - 2:31
    if I'd had more than the memory of seeing
    a trailer months back,
  • 2:31 - 2:34
    or the encouragement of a bunch of people
    I know, who loved it,
  • 2:34 - 2:36
    in my head when I watched it.
  • 2:36 - 2:40
    "I don't wanna tell you too much
    about the film, because
  • 2:40 - 2:44
    a lot of it are things
    that will take people by surprise.
  • 2:44 - 2:49
    I would rather them only knowing that
    and going in."
  • 2:49 - 2:52
    Know that Sorry to Bother You does have
    the skeleton of the movie you have
  • 2:52 - 2:55
    in your head when I talk about telemarketing
    and code switching,
  • 2:55 - 2:59
    but it's expressed in such a fun,
    creative, explosive way
  • 2:59 - 3:03
    that also doesn't hold back at all politically,
    or in how dark the film's sense of humour gets,
  • 3:03 - 3:05
    or how strange the plot gets.
  • 3:05 - 3:10
    I don't know when the last time I left a theater,
    this energized and high on the experience, was.
  • 3:10 - 3:13
    I felt a lot with Hereditary,
    but that was a downer and,
  • 3:13 - 3:17
    while it was perfectly made,
    it didn't have the wild experiments
  • 3:17 - 3:21
    with film form this movie has.
    Or the ingenuity, or creativity.
  • 3:21 - 3:24
    Sorry to Bother You is also
    fiercely unapologetically leftist.
  • 3:24 - 3:28
    "How does Sorry to Bother You fit
    into that picture of organizing.
  • 3:28 - 3:32
    I mean, it must be very interesting
    for you as a well-known, anticapitalist
  • 3:32 - 3:35
    - artist and organizer, to na-
    - Communist.
  • 3:35 - 3:39
    - ..., communist-marxist, to-
    - I don't know, Marx didn't he say
  • 3:39 - 3:41
    - ..., communist-marxist, to-
    - something like <>?
  • 3:41 - 3:42
    - (snickers)
    - something like <>?
  • 3:42 - 3:42
    - (snickers)
    - Yeah, so...
  • 3:43 - 3:43
    It's so brutal
  • 3:43 - 3:44
    and unusual
  • 3:44 - 3:47
    in its satire.
    Especially satire of racism
  • 3:47 - 3:50
    and of class exploitation in a way that
    I don't know if I've ever
  • 3:50 - 3:52
    seen in a film before.
  • 3:52 - 3:55
    If you care about daring experiments in
    film form; if you care about art
  • 3:55 - 3:59
    that examines racial oppression;
    if you care about capitalist exploitation;
  • 3:59 - 4:01
    if you want to laugh a whole lot and
    if you want to see a movie that somehow
  • 4:01 - 4:07
    handles very current, very serious topics
    yet doesn't go for cliches or for
  • 4:07 - 4:12
    dour humourlessness and leaves room
    for surreal experimentation and brilliant slapstick,
  • 4:12 - 4:14
    then you should go check this out.
  • 4:14 - 4:19
    "The background, the life that
    I've lead outside of art
  • 4:19 - 4:27
    has not really been allowed
    to be a big influence on film in the last,
  • 4:27 - 4:32
    you know, bunch of decades,
    so I've felt that telling a story that,
  • 4:32 - 4:40
    infused some of those ideas of struggle
    and movement-building
  • 4:41 - 4:47
    into a film would be great
    and I've got a strange sense of humour
  • 4:47 - 4:50
    and I like to force people to listen to me."
  • 4:50 - 4:53
    "And it's funny because
    movies don't usually deal with that,
  • 4:53 - 4:56
    even though its something that...
    They don't usually deal with the stuggle
  • 4:56 - 5:01
    that's happening; rebellion is edited out of
    the worlds that we create with our movies,
  • 5:01 - 5:05
    Unless it's like 300 years from now
    in some world we can't relate to.
  • 5:05 - 5:10
    But what's happening now is the product of
    us ignoring what's been going on for
  • 5:10 - 5:16
    a long time and that's us living in this system –
    it comes from the economic system that we're under.
  • 5:16 - 5:23
    And this film does deal with race, but
    it deals with race as it intersects
  • 5:23 - 5:26
    with the economic system we're in."
  • 5:26 - 5:29
    Very very slight spoilers here,
    but the key complaint I've had with
  • 5:29 - 5:35
    Sorry to Bother You was that the "white voice"
    ADR at times could have been done better.
  • 5:35 - 5:38
    I know it's called attention to in the film
    and obviously a lot of the film's humour
  • 5:38 - 5:42
    is derived from the incongruity of the
    white voice and the character's
  • 5:42 - 5:45
    actual normal speaking voice,
    but there are a couple of moments where
  • 5:45 - 5:49
    the way the actor's head was positioned,
    or their body language, or whatever
  • 5:49 - 5:52
    didn't match the ADR well,
    to the extend that it was kinda distracting.
  • 5:52 - 5:55
    And I know it's not supposed to match 100%
    and I'm sure they were fighting a bunch of
  • 5:55 - 5:59
    technical limitations and, again,
    I know a character says another sounds
  • 5:59 - 6:03
    overdubbed as a metajoke,
    but with so much attention to detail
  • 6:03 - 6:06
    and so much work put into this film,
    I wish there had been a little more time
  • 6:06 - 6:08
    spent on this specifically.
  • 6:08 - 6:13
    That's a small technical complaint though,
    in the face of a film that's fun and
  • 6:13 - 6:16
    biting, and daring.
    and with a first-time feature director,
  • 6:16 - 6:18
    and on a budget of only
    about 3 million dollars.
  • 6:18 - 6:20
    "I started out in film school,
  • 6:20 - 6:21
    before I did music,
  • 6:22 - 6:27
    and having so many strange ideas
    that I though would be hard to get funded.
  • 6:28 - 6:34
    I actually finished writing it in 2012.
    Then, I did an album inbetween that
  • 6:34 - 6:36
    so I set it down.
  • 6:36 - 6:42
    December 2014 - I ran into Dave Eggers
    from McSweeney's and
  • 6:43 - 6:47
    I let him read the script and
    he published it as its own paperback book.
  • 6:48 - 6:50
    So, since then I've been trying
    to get the movie made."
  • 6:51 - 6:55
    It's really incredible what writer-director
    Boots Riley accomplished here.
  • 6:55 - 7:01
    "I'm ambitious in the sense that
    I want to make great film,
  • 7:01 - 7:04
    so I have some fear
    that it's just a film.
  • 7:05 - 7:10
    Had I known how much work
    this movie would have been,
  • 7:10 - 7:12
    I would have written
    a movie about two people
  • 7:12 - 7:14
    sitting on a couch and
    breaking up. You know?"
  • 7:14 - 7:18
    I was cackling at a lot of the
    jokes and references
  • 7:18 - 7:20
    and I felt so invigorated
    by the ingenuity on display.
  • 7:21 - 7:24
    Without any details, there's a scene
    where a character moves
  • 7:24 - 7:28
    from one living situation to another.
    And the way that the move is communicated
  • 7:28 - 7:30
    kind of stunned me in its creativity.
  • 7:30 - 7:34
    Not to mention a ton of other small moments
    told in fun and creative ways.
  • 7:34 - 7:36
    It's such a unique aesthetic experience;
  • 7:36 - 7:40
    It's a challenging and engaging experience formally and intellectually.
  • 7:40 - 7:44
    And it's weird, and gross, and brutal, and funny.
  • 7:44 - 7:47
    "What do you think people are gonna walk away from this movie with?
  • 7:47 - 7:50
    - They're gonna walk away with about 18 less dollars.
    -
  • 7:50 - 7:52
    - They're gonna walk away with about 18 less dollars.
    - I was just thinking that (laughs).
  • 7:52 - 7:56
    But you will have thoroughly enjoyed yourself
    and, perhaps, if you're the thinking type,
  • 7:56 - 7:59

    you may reflect, but it's not required."
  • 7:59 - 8:01
    " - I mean, I think there's an optimism
    - Yup.
  • 8:02 - 8:04
    that comes throught this movie:
  • 8:04 - 8:07
    - that, even though the world is messed up,
    - Yup.
  • 8:07 - 8:13
    that there is a way to change it.
    There's an analysis that shows that
  • 8:13 - 8:17
    the people can do things
    like withold their labour
  • 8:17 - 8:23
    and, you know, take hold of things
    and there's an optimism that comes from that."
  • 8:24 - 8:27
    If you in any way tend to enjoy the works that I tend to enjoy
  • 8:28 - 8:29
    or if you just generally want
    something new
  • 8:29 - 8:31
    and something different
    and something leftist
  • 8:32 - 8:34
    definitely go check it out.
  • 8:36 - 8:38
    Thank you for watching!
  • 8:38 - 8:40
    If you enjoyed this video,
    please consider supporting me
  • 8:40 - 8:43
    on Patreon, or Ko-fi, so I can
    keep making videos like this one.
  • 8:43 - 8:44
    Thanks!
Title:
StrucciWatch: Sorry to Bother You Review *re-upload*
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English, British
Duration:
08:45

English, British subtitles

Revisions