< Return to Video

https:/.../Modeling_polynomials_video_debrief-part-2.mp4

  • 0:04 - 0:07
    >> So do you want to look at
    some of the student work?
  • 0:07 - 0:09
    >> Yes, let's take a look.
  • 0:09 - 0:12
    >> And how do you want to sort them?
  • 0:12 - 0:17
    >> Yeah, so we have two piles right now.
    One is their individual papers,
  • 0:17 - 0:20
    where they were asked to
    make a conjecture,
  • 0:20 - 0:26
    to consider the data and have their
    own noticings and wonderings about it,
  • 0:26 - 0:30
    and then to come back.
    So I'd like to see if they,
  • 0:32 - 0:34
    if any of them revised
    their original thinking.
  • 0:34 - 0:35
    >> Okay.
  • 0:37 - 0:39
    >> So maybe we can--
    >> We'll split it--
  • 0:39 - 0:40
    >> You and I can just do like a quick--
  • 0:40 - 0:44
    >> Yeah.
    >> Flip to see if ...
  • 0:47 - 0:49
    >> If there's anything different?
    >> If there's anything different.
  • 0:52 - 0:54
    And then--
    >> And by different, do you mean
  • 0:54 - 0:55
    the number or by the model?
  • 0:59 - 1:01
    >> I'm thinking the number.
    >> Okay.
  • 1:02 - 1:07
    >> What I'm seeing so far is
    that they're all putting 2.
  • 1:07 - 1:11
    >> Mm-hmm. [affirmative]
    >> Because they have that data.
  • 1:12 - 1:16
    Because they have that
    information from the table,
  • 1:16 - 1:18
    and, so they're just saying,
    "Oh, okay, it's from the table.
  • 1:18 - 1:19
    So that must be correct."
  • 1:21 - 1:23
    >> Not all of them.
    >> No?
  • 1:25 - 1:31
    >> Nope. Some of them are
    consistent with their solution from
  • 1:32 - 1:35
    their original conjecture,
    despite the fact that it was wrong.
  • 1:39 - 1:41
    And then do you want to
    sort them for the ones
  • 1:41 - 1:44
    that made the adjustment
    to the true number?
  • 1:47 - 1:51
    So I have some that have ...
    They changed their opinion.
  • 1:51 - 1:53
    >> Mm-hmm. [affirmative]
    >> But it went from 5 to 1.
  • 1:53 - 1:58
    >> Mm-hmm. So, but even
    those that changed it to the 2,
  • 2:04 - 2:11
    I think that they made that change
    because-- that's what the table says.
  • 2:11 - 2:13
    >> Right.
    >> It's the maximum.
  • 2:13 - 2:15
    >> But, there are some
    that still changed it to a 1.
  • 2:16 - 2:18
    >> I have some that
    changed it to a 1 as well.
  • 2:18 - 2:20
    > Okay, so let's look at those
    differently then, I guess.
  • 2:20 - 2:23
    >> Okay.
    > Ooh, I got a 4.
  • 2:23 - 2:29
    >> And that was left off of the--
    boxes, the one with the one cut.
  • 2:29 - 2:33
    So maybe they're thinking,
    the smaller the cut.
  • 2:34 - 2:37
    >> Well, there are also some
    here with 4s.
  • 2:38 - 2:40
    >> That changed to a 4?
    >> Yes.
  • 2:40 - 2:42
    >> Oh, interesting.
    >> Yes.
  • 2:42 - 2:45
    I'm trying to see if they're
    at the same table.
  • 2:46 - 2:50
    No.
    >> No.
  • 2:50 - 2:53
    These two were up at this table.
    >> Yeah.
  • 2:54 - 2:58
    >> Where was Antonio?
    Is he at the back corner?
  • 2:58 - 3:02
    Does he wear glasses?
    >> No, Antonio has curly hair.
  • 3:02 - 3:04
    He was sitting up here, I think.
    >> Oh, okay.
  • 3:04 - 3:08
    >> Emilio has glasses, so he was ...
    >> Oh, yeah. Mm-hmm.
  • 3:10 - 3:11
    Okay.
  • 3:18 - 3:20
    >> So you did have a
    number of them then.
  • 3:20 - 3:24
    If you want to measure that,
    your stack of the ones who changed their--
  • 3:24 - 3:25
    >> Who changed their--
    >> Opinion.
  • 3:25 - 3:29
    >> Opinion. So that's the majority.
  • 3:38 - 3:40
    So 16.
    >> Mm-hmm.
  • 3:40 - 3:42
    >> Out of ... Who was in here?
  • 3:42 - 3:45
    Maybe--
    >> 31.
  • 3:45 - 3:48
    >> 36. 31?
    >> Or 35.
  • 3:48 - 3:49
    >> 30...
    >> You're right.
  • 3:49 - 3:53
    -- 8 times 4 ... 30 ... 31 students.
    >> 31. So 16 out of 31
  • 3:53 - 3:57
    changed their conjecture after
    looking at the table.
  • 3:57 - 3:59
    >> Mm-hmm.
    >> And these students changed
  • 3:59 - 4:07
    it to 2 centimeters based on
    what they see in the table.
  • 4:07 - 4:12
    >> Mm-hmm. And do you think
    that if you hadn't taken that pause,
  • 4:12 - 4:21
    the thought process of making a conjecture
    and revising it would have come naturally?
  • 4:27 - 4:31
    >> I don't think all students
    would do that naturally.
  • 4:31 - 4:36
    No. I'm actually realizing I have a ...
    That's one in there.
  • 4:39 - 4:44
    >> And so, what do you think was the
    move that you made as a teacher
  • 4:44 - 4:48
    to help them get to this space?
    Because we are talking about now
  • 4:48 - 4:50
    the majority of the students.
    >> Mm-hmm.
  • 4:50 - 4:54
    Well, I think just that the design
    of the lesson to have a pause
  • 4:54 - 4:58
    and to ask them to revisit
    and invite them to revise.
  • 4:58 - 5:02
    >> Mm-hmm.
    >> I think just that practice of
  • 5:02 - 5:07
    slowing down what we're doing
    so that students have the time
  • 5:07 - 5:14
    to sort of be metacognitive about their
    own learning process, you know?
  • 5:14 - 5:19
    That's what -- that’s
    what strong thinkers do
  • 5:19 - 5:23
    is we think about, and we revise,
    thinking as we go.
  • 5:23 - 5:25
    >> Mm-hmm.
    >> Right?
  • 5:25 - 5:28
    I'm not calling myself a strong thinker.
    I'm just saying the royal we, you know?
  • 5:28 - 5:34
    I put this one on top because
    I'm interested to read. He says,
  • 5:34 - 5:41
    "I think it will be a 2-centimeter cut,
    because the smaller the cut size,
  • 5:41 - 5:46
    "the greater the length and width
    even though the height is small."
  • 5:46 - 5:49
    >> Mm-hmm.
    >> So with this student,
  • 5:49 - 5:50
    I don't recognize this handwriting--
  • 5:52 - 5:55
    or the name. Who is that?
    >> Jeannette.
  • 5:55 - 5:56
    >> Oh.
    >> Linette, sorry.
  • 5:56 - 6:00
    >> Linette. Oh, so she's really
    trying to reason through
  • 6:00 - 6:06
    why that might provide
    the greatest volume.
  • 6:06 - 6:10
    >> Mm-hmm.
    >> Which I don't see is necessarily true
  • 6:10 - 6:15
    of all of the students who did revise
    their thinking. I see more frequently,
  • 6:15 - 6:21
    “I think the 2-centimeter cut will
    maximize the volume because ...”
  • 6:21 - 6:23
    >> I'm looking at.. Yeah.
    >> It's the one that
  • 6:23 - 6:26
    has the greatest volume,
    you know? And there I see
  • 6:26 - 6:34
    maybe three who are really thinking
    about, why is it 2, you know?
  • 6:34 - 6:39
    and relating it to the length and
    the width that are also considered.
  • 6:39 - 6:41
    >> But I think you gave them
    the opportunity in the beginning
  • 6:41 - 6:43
    to justify their original thinking.
    >> Mm-hmm.
  • 6:43 - 6:49
    >> And, so that there were
    some ideas put out there.
  • 6:49 - 6:52
    Because some of the students were
    talking about the area of the base --
  • 6:52 - 6:55
    >> Of the base. That's right.
    >> And were being considerate of that.
  • 6:55 - 6:57
    >> Mm-hmm.
    >> And then I also heard
  • 6:57 - 6:59
    another student that was
    talking about the same idea
  • 6:59 - 7:01
    about just using a 1,
    because that leaves me
  • 7:01 - 7:03
    with the most on the bottom--
    >> Base area.
  • 7:03 - 7:05
    >> Yeah.
    >> Right, yeah.
  • 7:05 - 7:12
    Right, and I think also,
    you know, often in math class,
  • 7:12 - 7:20
    teachers and students are about
    getting answers and moving through content
  • 7:20 - 7:26
    at a pace. And so, I think anything
    that slows that process down
  • 7:26 - 7:33
    helps learners step up and have
    the opportunity to really learn
  • 7:33 - 7:36
    instead of just have
    things thrown at them.
  • 7:36 - 7:36
    >> Mm-hmm.
Title:
https:/.../Modeling_polynomials_video_debrief-part-2.mp4
Video Language:
English
Duration:
07:42

English subtitles

Incomplete

Revisions