< Return to Video

Jon Kuniholm, "Good Design by Design" | Talks at Google

  • Not Synced
    Hi everybody, hear me ok?
  • Not Synced
    Okay, so I think we're going to get going.
  • Not Synced
    My name is Michael Wizmalik.
  • Not Synced
    Our guest today: Jonathan Kuniholm.
  • Not Synced
    I met him in I think 2007, as far as we can piece back together,
  • Not Synced
    at a SIFU conference, and he had some pretty cool tech that he was demoing on some robotics stuff related to prosthetics.
  • Not Synced
    And I was impressed enough that I said "You should come and give a talk at Google sometime"
  • Not Synced
    and he took that to heart, and about four or five years later, emailed me and said "Hey, you offered that talk at Google. Now would be a great time."
  • Not Synced
    So, we're hosting him today.
  • Not Synced
    Johnathan is the president and founder of the open prosthetics project.
  • Not Synced
    He's also the founder of stumpworks, a startup that focuses on prosthetic technology.
  • Not Synced
    He's also presidential appointee to the national council on disability and the stuff he has to say is pretty cool.
  • Not Synced
    So please, put your hands together and help me welcome Jon.
  • Not Synced
    (applause)
  • Not Synced
    Thanks very much Michael.
  • Not Synced
    Let me just first offer a disclaimer with respect to my government job,
  • Not Synced
    and they encourage us to do this, that everything I say today are my personal views and not reflective of any position of the government.
  • Not Synced
    So what I would like to talk about today is how we can design good design to solve problems that society has for the most part neglected.
  • Not Synced
    And I came across one of the problems personally after I lost my arm in 2005 and discovered that prosthetic arms were an orphan medical device.
  • Not Synced
    And in thinking a little bit more about why prosthetic arms lagged so far behind other technology that we use everyday,
  • Not Synced
    I started to realise that prosthetic arms and orphan medical devices are part of a larger group of those problems that society has tended to neglect,
  • Not Synced
    which can be solved by something that we're beginning to call "public interested design."
  • Not Synced
    And the question that I'd really like to talk about today, and I would actually like it to be the beginning of a discussion,
  • Not Synced
    because it's something that by no means I claim to have begun to solve is how can we marshall all of the tools at our disposal trying to better solve those problems.
  • Not Synced
    because very much now I believe that most of those problems are solved in a haphazard way.
  • Not Synced
    Government funded projects, philanthropy, side-projects from industry,
  • Not Synced
    you name the way that people happen upon these issues and try to solve them,
  • Not Synced
    but in general, you can be sure that the resources and attention that we devote towards solving these underserved
  • Not Synced
    needs are going to lag far behind those problems which are very obvious from every other standpoint that needs solving.
  • Not Synced
    You know, very profitable things.
  • Not Synced
    There was no question that cell phone technology was going to improve over the last ten years for example.
  • Not Synced
    So in the summer of 2005, I took leave from graduate school at Duke University,
  • Not Synced
    and I was deployed as a marine to Iraq and Anbar province.
  • Not Synced
    And I was the platoon commander for an engineer platoon of about 15 marines,
  • Not Synced
    and we were doing mostly what everbody was doing over there, which was sustainment and sustainability operations,
  • Not Synced
    patrolling, guarding convoys, that sort of thing.
  • Not Synced
    On New Year's Day of 2005, I was on a foot patrol that was ambushed by Improvised Explosive Device,
  • Not Synced
    and the blast took off most of my forearm, and I found myself back in the States,
  • Not Synced
    and learning about prosthetic arm technology.
  • Not Synced
    I managed to get myself back to school, and get involved with a research project sponsored by DARPA,
  • Not Synced
    called the "Revolutionising Prosthetics 2009 Project."
  • Not Synced
    It was one of two that DARPA was funding, which was really the first
  • Not Synced
    serious prosthetic arm research effort that had occured in the United States since -
  • Not Synced
    maybe there was a small one in the 70s, but really -
  • Not Synced
    since World War 2.
  • Not Synced
    And the goal was a really ambitious one.
  • Not Synced
    The goal was to create in four years in 2007,
  • Not Synced
    an arm using commercially available technology that could go to market in that year, in 2007, and then
  • Not Synced
    more ambitiously, to create an arm that had more degrees of freedom, was fully neurally integrated,
  • Not Synced
    so nearly the same articulation as a native human arm and full strength.
  • Not Synced
    An incredibly ambitious project.
  • Not Synced
    What I think is important to understand, there's been an enormous,
  • Not Synced
    and this picture is up here, not to brag that I was on 60 minutes, but to show the kind of attention that these projects got,
  • Not Synced
    for whatever reason, prosthetic arms to really capture the popular imagination.
  • Not Synced
    People love robotics, they love thinking about the barriers, the singluarity, and barriers between man and machine disappearing
  • Not Synced
    and it becomes a vehicle for all kinds of philosophical and science fiction interest.
  • Not Synced
    I think the take-away about these project which is important to remember is first of all, that
  • Not Synced
    we, despite the amazing things that both of these research efforts accomplished,
  • Not Synced
    we still have not, ten years after the war began in Afghanistan, actually, pushing 15 now,
  • Not Synced
    still do not have any commercially available device that has resulted from any of this government funded research.
  • Not Synced
    We're still waiting for the first one. It has remained as always, just around the corner,
  • Not Synced
    and I'm told that we're waiting on FDA approval for the DECA RP07 project to recieve FDA approval,
  • Not Synced
    and it has been some clinical trials, but we still haven't seen a device.
  • Not Synced
    The other one is that I think it's important to understand,
  • Not Synced
    it's my belief that we have a media bias.
  • Not Synced
    It's not a political or conservative media bias, but it's one towards entertainment.
  • Not Synced
    And so the word bionic is used a lot, the words dextrous and manipulation are also used a lot, which have very specific meanings in robotics,
  • Not Synced
    and with, there are some caveats that I could give, you could call a trigger grip, for example,
  • Not Synced
    where one part of the hand is grasping a handle of a cordless drill, and the finger is pulling the trigger,
  • Not Synced
    that tends towards manipulation. It's at least a compound grasp, one part of your hand is doing one thing, and one doing another.
  • Not Synced
    Of course, the slide that I'm showing here right now, gives you some insight into what the human hands are capable of.
  • Not Synced
    This pair of hands is doing a card trick, where four cuts of the deck are being controlled by different parts of the two hands.
  • Not Synced
    And it's a dynamic movement, and so I guarantee you that there isn't a robotic hand of any kind that could do these card tricks right now.
  • Not Synced
    But, based on the popular press presentation of all this, you would think that it can.
  • Not Synced
    You would think that these problems are solved.
  • Not Synced
    So I think it's important to acknowledge the strides that were made by these research projects, it's also very important to understand that we are not there yet.
  • Not Synced
    And we do not have bionic people and these hands are for the most part right now, it would be fair to say,
  • Not Synced
    at least in terms of prosthetic control, that even these highly articulated hands are only capable of grasping,
  • Not Synced
    and the difference between grasping and manipulation, I think,
  • Not Synced
    you can use a Rubik's cube to illustrate.
  • Not Synced
    Manipulation is a speed cuber solving a Rubik's cube in a few minutes,
  • Not Synced
    and grasping is not dropping it. And grasping a Rubik's cube is actually something that I can do with the hook that I wear when I do wear a prosthetic arm,
  • Not Synced
    which is the Dorance 5X, named after the guy who patented it in 1912, and you can see that since then it has evolved a little bit.
  • Not Synced
    There's some rubber grip on the fingers, a cigarette notch, and I think it's called a pen notch now.
  • Not Synced
    But this remains, despite everything that's happened, the most used prosthetic terminal device in America
  • Not Synced
    and, were you to go to the ...... (check) lecture conference
  • Not Synced
    in New Brunswick, in Canada, this August, it would be a fair bet to make that
  • Not Synced
    the majority of amputees attending the conference,
  • Not Synced
    at least the ones who aren't paid to be there by a prosthetic company,
  • Not Synced
    would be wearing one of these devices, and not any of the robotic prosthetic hands that are available.
  • Not Synced
    The other thing that's important to know about this is that there is another choice,
  • Not Synced
    which actually beats all of them, which is the one that I'm wearing today,
  • Not Synced
    which is nothing.
  • Not Synced
    And about half of all army amputees choose most times not to wear prostheses at all
  • Not Synced
    and it's mostly because of weight and comfort and suspension:
  • Not Synced
    I'm going to talk about that a little bit later.
  • Not Synced
    So, now, why, why is all of that?
  • Not Synced
    You know, this is by no means an attack on any of the folks
  • Not Synced
    who were generous enough to fund that project and try to make some progress.
  • Not Synced
    The real problem is that there simply isn't a market for these things.
  • Not Synced
    The market for powered arms is just barely noticed, compared to these other large markets
  • Not Synced
    and even though the government has accomplished quite a bit in some of these research projects,
  • Not Synced
    the -- what we call the value of death (check), which is the bridge that one of these products must cross
  • Not Synced
    in order to get from the lab into becoming a clinical product is really significant.
  • Not Synced
    And without a market to drive further funding, that gap, which is estimated by people in the industry
  • Not Synced
    to be something like 90% of the R and D remaining on the medical product (check)
  • Not Synced
    once a proof of principle device is finished, there's simply nowhere
  • Not Synced
    for these resources to come from and make it happen. (12:58)
Title:
Jon Kuniholm, "Good Design by Design" | Talks at Google
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Team:
Captions Requested
Duration:
01:01:26
  • Thank you so much for subtitling this video, Dennis. It's a long one - do you want to subtitle it alone, or would it be OK if others joined?

  • No, definitely happy for others to join in. Pretty new to Amara, so I'm not sure what the normal process is for dividing up larger files.

    I'm done for the night anyway, so very happy to have someone continue on from where I got up to. :)

  • Thanks, Dennis, so I did, but just a little bit for now because my connection is slow. I marked the point reach in the last sub - 12:58 - because it makes it easier to launch the video at the right point. I also added some "(check)" for bits I'm not sure of - they can wait until we do the syncing.

    Best,

    Claude

  • Thanks, Dennis, so I did, but just a little bit for now because my connection is slow. I marked the point reach in the last sub - 12:58 - because it makes it easier to launch the video at the right point. I also added some "(check)" for bits I'm not sure of - they can wait until we do the syncing.

    Best,

    Claude

  • Hi, Connie and Dennis,

    So now "Talks at Google" has captioned the original video: per se, that's great, but I hope you're not too peeved about the time you spent on the subtitles here? Sorry about that: they didn't use to caption these talks. I'll now upload their subtitles over ours: this way if people want to translate them, they can do it here.

    Best,

    Claude

English subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions