-
What I wanna do on this video, for some triangle we're gonna focused
-
on this larger triangle over heretriangle ABC
-
What I wanna do is prove that circumcenter,
-
remember the circumcenter is the intersection
-
of it's perpendicular bisectors
-
The circumcenter for this triangle, the centroid of this triangle,
-
the centroid is the intersection of it's medians,
-
and the orthocenter, that's the intersection of it's altitudes
-
all sit on the same line, or that OI right over here really a line segment
-
Or that OG and GI are really just 2 segments
-
that make up these 2 line segments which is part of the euler line
-
And to do that, I've set up a medial triangle right over here,
-
triangle FED, or actually I should say, triangle DEF,
-
whch is the medial triangle for ABC
-
And there's already a bunch of things
-
that we know about medial triangle
-
and we've proven this in previous videos
-
One thing we know, is the medial triangle DEF,
-
DEF is going to be similar to the larger triangle
-
the triangle that is a medial triangle of,
-
it is of, and ratio from the larger triangle to the smaller triangle
-
it's a 2 to 1 ratio
-
And this is really important to proof
-
When two triangles are similar with the given ratio,
-
that means if you take the distance between any 2 corresponding parts
-
of the two similar triangles that ratio will be 2 to 1
-
Now the other relationship that we've already shown,
-
the other relationship between the medial triangle,
-
and the triangle that is the medial triangle
-
of is that we've shown the orthocenter
-
of the medial center of the larger triangle
-
So one way to think about it is Point O,
-
we already mentioned is the circumcenter of the larger triangle
-
It is also the, it is also the orthocenter of the smaller triangle,
-
we actually wrote it of here
-
so Point O noticed it is on this perpendicular bisector,
-
you know, I should do a bunch of other ones of this dark grey color
-
but I didn't wanna make this diagram too messy
-
But this is the circumcenter of the larger triangle
-
Now in order to prove that OG and I all sit on the same line
-
or the same segment in this case
-
What I'm going to do, I wanna prove,
-
I'm going to prove that triangle FOG,
-
I'm going to prove that triangle FOG,
-
is similar to, is similar to triangle CIG,
-
is similar to triangle CIG
-
Because if I can prove that, then their corresponding angles
-
are going to be equivalent,
-
you could say this is angle is going to be equal
-
to those angle over here
-
And so OI would have to be a transversal,
-
cause we're goiong to see these two lines here are parallel
-
or if these two triangles are similar,
-
just remember that someone's look at our triangle here
-
and this triangles over there
-
If they truly are similar then this angle
-
is going to be equal to that angle
-
which would mean that,
-
so these are really would be vertical angles
-
and so this really would be real line
-
So let's go the actual proof
-
So maybe, I don't need those to highlight it over here
-
So one thing and I've hinted about this already,
-
we know that this line over here, we can call this like XC
-
we know this is perpendicular like AB
-
it is an altitude, and we also know that FY right over here
-
is perpendicular to AB, it is a perpendicular bi-sector
-
So they both form the same angle with a transversal
-
you can view AB as a transversal
-
so they must be parallel, so we know that FY,
-
FY is parallel to XC, to XC
-
segment FY is parallel to XC,
-
segment FY is parallel to segment XC
-
And we can write it; this guy is parallel to that guy there
-
And that's useful because we know that alternate interior angles
-
of a transversal, when a transversal intersects two parallel
-
lines are congruent
-
So we know, we know that this angle, so we know that FC is a line
-
it is a median of this larger triangle, triangle ABC
-
So you have a line intersecting two parallel lines,
-
alternate interior angels are congruent
-
So that angle is gonna be congruent to that angle
-
So you could say angle OFG is congruent to angle,
-
so it's OFG, it's congruent to angel ICG,
-
to ICG, now the other, the other thing we know,
-
this is a property, this is a property of medians is that
-
a median splits up or should I say the centroid,
-
splits the median in to two segments that have a ratio of two to one
-
or another way to think about this is a centroid
-
is two thirds along the median
-
So we know we've proven this on a previous video
-
We know that CG, CG is a equal to 2 times GF, 2 times GF
-
and I think you see where you are going,
-
we have an angle, I've shown you that the ratio of this side
-
to this side is 2 to 1 and that's just the property
-
of centroids and medians
-
And now if we can show you the ratio of his side CI is FO is 2 to 1
-
that we have two corresponding sides where the ratio is 2 to 1,
-
and we have the angle and between this congruent,
-
and we have the SAS singularity to show that these two triangles
-
are actually similar, so let's actually think about that
-
CI is the distance between, CI is the between the larger triangle's
-
point C orthocenter of the larger triangle
-
Well what is FO?
-
Well F is a corresponding point to point C on the medial triangle
-
and we make sure that we specify the similarity with the right, F,
-
F corresponds to point C
-
So FO is the distance between F on the smaller medial triangle
-
and the smaller medial triangle's orthocenter
-
So this is the distance between C
-
and the orthocenter of the larger triangle
-
This is the distance between the corresponding
-
side of the medial triangle
-
and the smaller medial triangle and it's orthocenter
-
So this is the same corresponding distance
-
on the larger triangle and the medial triangle,
-
and we already know that they're similar with the ratio of 2 to 1
-
And so the corresponding distances between any 2 points
-
on the two same triangle are gonna have the same ratio
-
So because of that similarity, because of the similarity
-
we know that CI, CI is gonna be equal to 2 times FO
-
I wanna emphasize this; C is the corresponding point to F,
-
when we look at both of these similar triangles,
-
I is the orthocenter of the larger triangle,
-
O is the orthocenter of the smaller triangle
-
You're taking a corresponding point
-
to the orthocenter of the larger triangle,
-
corresponding point of the smaller triangle
-
The triangles are similar to the ratios of 2 to 1
-
so the ratio of this length to this length is going to be 2 to 1
-
So we've shown, we've shown the ratio
-
of this side to this side is 2 to 1
-
We've shown the ratio if this side to side is also to 2 to 1
-
We've shown the angle in between are,
-
the angle between them is congruent
-
So we have proven by SAS similarity,
-
so it goes down a little bit, so by, by SAS similarity,
-
not congruency, similarity we've proven that triangle FOG
-
is similar to CIG
-
And so we know corresponding triangles are congruent,
-
we know that angle CIG correspond to angle FOG
-
so those are going to be congruent, and we also know that angle CGI,
-
angle CGI, let me do this a new color,
-
angle CGI corresponds to angel OGF
-
so they're also going to be congruent
-
So you can look at the different ways of these angle
-
and this angle are the same you can now view OI
-
as a true line as a transversal of these two parallel lines
-
So that let's you know that's a one line
-
or you can look these two over here,
-
so look these two angles are equivalent
-
so these must be vertical angles,
-
so this must actually be, this actually must be the same line
-
The angle that this is approaching, this,
-
this median is the same angle that is leaving
-
So these are all, these are definitely on the same line
-
So it's a very simple proof, once again,
-
from a very profound idea, the orthocenter,
-
the centroid and the median of any triangle
-
all sit on this magical euler's line