< Return to Video

Diverse Speaker Training Workshop Part 2

  • 0:01 - 0:13
    So now we're going to go into writing your
    pitch. Okay, so in this section, we are
  • 0:13 - 0:19
    going to talk about what a proposal AKA
    pitch is, coming up with a great title,
  • 0:19 - 0:25
    and a little writing exercise. That's
    actually switched around... Writing your
  • 0:25 - 0:36
    bio, writing exercise, and then optionally
    anybody who wants to present their titles
  • 0:36 - 0:45
    into pitches. Okay, so, whatever your
    motivation is for speaking, you first need
  • 0:45 - 0:50
    to get selected to speak. And for that,
    you need to create a proposal or pitch.
  • 0:50 - 0:55
    And we'll use those terms interchangeably.
    And one will that will get your talk
  • 0:55 - 1:00
    selected. And also, since your proposal
    defines the scope of your talk, it can be
  • 1:00 - 1:04
    a good early step in the overall process
    of developing your talk.
  • 1:05 - 1:12
    What makes a great pitch? So first, here's
    an example of a good one. Responsify all
  • 1:12 - 1:16
    the Things. In our new web multiverse,
    it's more important than ever to make your
  • 1:16 - 1:20
    valuable content available to all users,
    regardless of how they access your site.
  • 1:21 - 1:28
    In this talk, we'll cover how responsive
    web design came about, the latest RWD news
  • 1:28 - 1:32
    and trends, and some basic and not so
    basic techniques you can use to make your
  • 1:32 - 1:36
    next WordPress theme a responsive one.
    Intended for developers and designers who
  • 1:36 - 1:39
    aren't afraid to get their hands dirty
    with a little code.
  • 1:42 - 1:49
    So this is a good length. It tells you
    what the talk will cover and it tells you
  • 1:49 - 1:54
    who it's aimed at. In some cases, you
    might also want to say what people will
  • 1:54 - 2:01
    walk away with from this talk. On the
    topic of the title, beware of too clever
  • 2:01 - 2:06
    titles. The title should stand on its own
    without a blurb. Here's an example of a
  • 2:06 - 2:15
    bad one, "CSS dreams and elephants." What
    do you think makes this a good or bad
  • 2:15 - 2:21
    title? And this is a question for
    discussion right now. Aurooba?
  • 2:21 - 2:25
    It doesn't really tell me what I will be
    getting out of this talk.
  • 2:26 - 2:30
    Right? So in that title we have no idea
    what it's about, what you'll be getting
  • 2:30 - 2:40
    out of it. Anyone else have anything to
    add? Okay, great. Yeah, that's pretty much
  • 2:40 - 2:43
    it. That's, it's it's a cute title, but it
    is too vague.
  • 2:47 - 2:51
    Generally, your talk proposal and the
    introduction of your outline will be quite
  • 2:51 - 2:57
    similar. A good introduction should have
    all the things a good pitch would have.
  • 2:57 - 3:02
    However, in a pitch, you might want to
    spice it up a bit. Ultimately, both the
  • 3:02 - 3:10
    introduction and pitch should contain some
    more content. For a pitch, you want to
  • 3:10 - 3:13
    tailor the tone of your writing and
    vocabulary to the specific audience and
  • 3:13 - 3:18
    event that you're applying to. This is
    very important. Some ideas of how you may
  • 3:18 - 3:23
    tailor your pitch for specific audiences
    and events: The tone may be different. A
  • 3:23 - 3:28
    business crowd may be formal, a Meetup may
    be more casual, so customize the tone of
  • 3:28 - 3:32
    your pitch to your specific audience. At
    WordPress events, in general, we tend to
  • 3:32 - 3:37
    be pretty casual. You might want to use
    different vocabulary depending on the
  • 3:37 - 3:42
    audience. And you might want to stress
    different talks or points of interest
  • 3:42 - 3:44
    depending on the audience or event.
  • 3:46 - 3:51
    There are six important points to take
    note of when writing both your outline and
  • 3:51 - 3:55
    your pitch. And this comes from the site
    that is written on the screen:
  • 3:57 - 4:07
    weareallaweso.me/for_speakers/how-to-write-a-compelling-proposal.html.
    Point number one: Direct the proposal to
  • 4:07 - 4:13
    the attendees, not the curators. Many
    conferences use your talk proposal as the
  • 4:13 - 4:18
    description of the talk in their program.
    With that in mind, your target reader is
  • 4:18 - 4:22
    the conference attendee who is reading the
    program. Tell the reader why your talk
  • 4:22 - 4:26
    will interest them and what they will
    learn. The curators want to put together a
  • 4:26 - 4:31
    great conference with compelling talks for
    their attendees. The talk will be part of
  • 4:31 - 4:35
    the package they offer so sell it! Make
    sure you research the event. Are there
  • 4:35 - 4:39
    different tracks? Is the audience. Are
    there lots of devs? Is it mostly for
  • 4:39 - 4:45
    users? Is it design heavy? Different
    WordCamps have different personalities.
  • 4:45 - 4:49
    Are they short on really technical
    presentations? Light on talks for
  • 4:49 - 4:52
    beginners? Try to fill a need, such as
    podcasting.
  • 4:54 - 5:00
    Number two: Be specific about the focus
    that your talk will have. Generally
  • 5:00 - 5:04
    speaking, a shallow introduction to many
    things is not as interesting as an in
  • 5:04 - 5:09
    depth introduction to one thing. If you
    discuss the broader topic, do so only to
  • 5:09 - 5:11
    set the context for what you'll focus on.
  • 5:13 - 5:19
    Number three: One strategy is pose the
    question that your talk will answer. Often
  • 5:19 - 5:25
    talks answer questions that start with
    how, why, when, and so on. An easy trick
  • 5:25 - 5:29
    is to directly ask these questions in your
    proposal, leaving the reader wondering the
  • 5:29 - 5:29
    answer.
  • 5:29 - 5:36
    Number four: Make your point as simply as
    you can. If your first draft requires more
  • 5:36 - 5:42
    than two paragraphs to get to the point of
    your topic, edit to narrow things down.
  • 5:42 - 5:46
    Take out any words that can be removed
    without changing the meaning. You may have
  • 5:46 - 5:51
    a lot of competition so try to make a good
    impression quickly. If your proposal is
  • 5:51 - 5:55
    too much work to read or understand, i
    might get skipped during the selectio
  • 5:55 - 6:03
    process.
  • 6:01 - 6:07
    Number five: Use proper grammar, spelling,
    and punctuation. If you submit a sloppily
  • 6:07 - 6:11
    written proposal, you appear careless and
    as if you're not taking the opportunity
  • 6:11 - 6:16
    seriously. You risk being rejected on
    those grounds outright. Speaking requires
  • 6:16 - 6:19
    a lot of thoughtful preparation, and
    curators can only assume it will be as
  • 6:19 - 6:21
    careless when preparing the talk itself.
  • 6:23 - 6:28
    And number six: Have your proposal
    reviewed by someone with experience. Just
  • 6:28 - 6:32
    as you might ask a friend to critique a
    draft of your CV, an essay or the talk
  • 6:32 - 6:37
    itself, ask someone, ideally a writer,
    speaker or curator to review your talk
  • 6:37 - 6:42
    proposal. They'll catch typos as well as
    verify whether your proposal explains the
  • 6:42 - 6:46
    scope of your talk, and explains its
    benefits to your audience.
  • 6:48 - 6:53
    Next, we're going to talk about coming up
    with a great title. We need a good title
  • 6:53 - 6:57
    for your talk. You're going to want to try
    to think of something catchy but
  • 6:57 - 7:03
    explanatory. Be aware of too clever titles
    and create a title that can stand on its
  • 7:03 - 7:07
    own without a blurb. For example, don't
    use something like "CSS and Elephants."
  • 7:09 - 7:15
    We're also going to talk right now about
    writing your bio. When you submit a
  • 7:15 - 7:20
    proposal or pitch to an event, you'll most
    often be asked to include a short bio.
  • 7:20 - 7:25
    Bios are often the hardest to write well,
    but here are some pointers to follow. It
  • 7:25 - 7:27
    should be written in the third person.
  • 7:28 - 7:33
    It should be succinct, but descriptive. It
    should only be a short paragraph and go
  • 7:33 - 7:37
    for economy of words. Try to say the most
    you possibly can with the fewest possible
  • 7:37 - 7:43
    words. Mention what your position or job
    is, and include any credentials that might
  • 7:43 - 7:47
    be relevant. Mention how many years you've
    been in this field, or if it hasn't been
  • 7:47 - 7:52
    that many, tell a short story about how
    you've ended up in your new field. Look at
  • 7:52 - 7:56
    past examples for the conference you're
    submitting to. Why are you the right
  • 7:56 - 8:00
    person to give this talk and tailor your
    bio so your topic makes sense. You might
  • 8:00 - 8:06
    want to tweak it differently for different
    topics and different events. Be human.
  • 8:06 - 8:11
    WordCamps are usually not too formal. And
    feel free to add something about your non
  • 8:11 - 8:14
    professional interests at the end, but
    don't make it your entire bio.
  • 8:15 - 8:20
    So what we're going to do now is we're
    going to have 15 minutes to try drafting a
  • 8:20 - 8:24
    talk proposal for the idea that you
    brainstormed earlier, the title, and your
  • 8:24 - 8:28
    bio, There'll be a chance to read the
    title and pitch to the group after if you
  • 8:28 - 8:32
    wish. We'll see if we have time for
    reading it to each other today or that'll
  • 8:32 - 8:39
    be part of tomorrow's session. But let's
    go ahead and do the 15 minutes. If you
  • 8:39 - 8:43
    need me to flip back and forth between any
    of the slides, you can write that in the
  • 8:43 - 8:49
    chat; I'll watch for that. I'll also grab
    a link from our Slack. I put the link to
  • 8:49 - 8:53
    the slides if you want to grab them and be
    able to refer to those sections because
  • 8:53 - 8:58
    we're working on three things at once
    right now. So go ahead and start that. If
  • 8:58 - 9:03
    you've any questions about it, put it into
    the chat. I'll check that as well. So I'm
  • 9:03 - 9:06
    going to go ahead and start 15 minutes.
  • 23:44 - 24:19
    There's about 30 seconds left. All right.
    If anyone needs more time, you can always
  • 24:19 - 24:25
    keep writing while we're going through
    with presentations. So what I'd like to do
  • 24:25 - 24:33
    now is hear from anybody who would like to
    share some titles and pitches. You'll have
  • 24:33 - 24:38
    about two minutes or less for a mini
    presentation. There's no expectations;
  • 24:38 - 24:42
    it's not a chance to practice being great.
    It's just an opportunity to practice being
  • 24:42 - 24:48
    in front of people. And you may request
    proceeding feedback if you wish. And if
  • 24:48 - 24:56
    you do, they'll be about time for a minute
    of feedback. So would anybody like to
  • 24:56 - 25:10
    share their pitch? Title and pitch?
    Miriam? Don't feel guilty for being
  • 25:10 - 25:11
    awesome.
  • 25:13 - 25:19
    All right, so, my title is "The Big
    Transition: Moving from an Office to a
  • 25:19 - 25:25
    Remote Work Culture." And the pitch I have
    is, "Traditionally people have gone to an
  • 25:25 - 25:30
    office building for a typical nine to five
    job. But more and more people, myself
  • 25:30 - 25:36
    included, make the transition to remote,
    whether it's by their choice or not. So
  • 25:36 - 25:41
    find out about the successes and struggles
    that this transition may cause and tips to
  • 25:41 - 25:42
    help you flourish going forth."
  • 25:45 - 25:46
    Would you like feedback?
  • 25:46 - 25:47
    Yes, please.
  • 25:47 - 25:52
    Awesome. That sounds great to me.
    Everything was clear. It didn't leave me
  • 25:52 - 25:58
    with any questions. I was clear of what
    I'd be getting out of it. And it sounds
  • 25:58 - 26:04
    pretty engaging to me. Does anybody else
    have any other thoughts? And if you do,
  • 26:04 - 26:09
    just to reminder that be sure to say
    something that you liked about it before
  • 26:09 - 26:11
    suggesting improvements.
  • 26:15 - 26:20
    It's it's really clear medium, what the
    topic is, and it's really nice.
  • 26:22 - 26:23
    Thank you.
  • 26:23 - 26:26
    I don't really have any edits. That was
    really solid.
  • 26:30 - 26:39
    Awesome. Okay, would anybody else like to
    share theirs? Aurooba.
  • 26:40 - 26:49
    Okay.And yes, I'm absolutely open to
    feedback. The title is "Extending Existing
  • 26:49 - 26:56
    Gutenberg blocks." And then the pitch is,
    "Instead of creating entirely new blocks
  • 26:56 - 27:00
    to add a few features, learn how to save
    time by extending existing Gutenberg
  • 27:00 - 27:06
    blocks. We'll cover basic JSX syntax, how
    to create block variations, and how to add
  • 27:06 - 27:11
    custom attributes and controls to any
    block. This is intended for intermediate
  • 27:11 - 27:14
    WordPress developers getting started with
    native Gutenberg development."
  • 27:15 - 27:25
    Awesome. Great. That, to me, also seems
    super solid. I have nothing to add or
  • 27:25 - 27:30
    change on it. It is very clear. I think
    it's something that people are going to
  • 27:30 - 27:36
    want to hear about. And like you said,
    really well in the pitch, you know, kind
  • 27:36 - 27:41
    of, you address the difference between
    writing a whole new one and extending. So
  • 27:41 - 27:47
    I really like that. Bhargav, are you
    giving feedback or sharing yours?
  • 27:49 - 27:50
    Sharing mine?
  • 27:50 - 27:54
    Okay, well, I'm just gonna see if anybody
    has feedback for Aurooba before
  • 27:54 - 28:02
    continuing. Okay, I'm
  • 28:02 - 28:04
    Also very clear, so excellent job.
  • 28:08 - 28:13
    Awesome.Great work, everybody so far. All
    right, Bhargav. Thanks for volunteering.
  • 28:15 - 28:22
    "Try to lose career opportunity that I
    grabbed." Title two like, I thought, "A
  • 28:23 - 28:28
    journey of transformation from developer
    to functional consultant: Challenges and
  • 28:28 - 28:36
    Outcomes." That is the title. And the
    pitch decks is, "In the current market
  • 28:36 - 28:42
    scenario, everyone is trying to become a
    developer. He also wanted to be one. But
  • 28:42 - 28:49
    destiny had other options in favor, and he
    wanted him to try other career options. To
  • 28:49 - 28:54
    break the notion that 'once a developer is
    always a developer,' he switched his
  • 28:54 - 29:01
    career to become one which he was
    comfortable with. And which given him more
  • 29:01 - 29:06
    respect and reputation in the company.
    Know his struggle and his journey of
  • 29:06 - 29:10
    switching the career. Everyone who is
    confused in choosing their career path
  • 29:10 - 29:12
    must join this session."
  • 29:14 - 29:16
    Thanks, would you like feedback?
  • 29:16 - 29:17
    Yeah.
  • 29:17 - 29:20
    Awesome. Does anybody have some feedback
    to give?
  • 29:25 - 29:31
    I vote for title number two. I thought
    that was like more clear. And aside from
  • 29:31 - 29:38
    that, maybe the pitch could be slightly
    shorter, but I felt like it also covered
  • 29:38 - 29:44
    everything. So maybe like some parts could
    be shortened a little bit but otherwise,
  • 29:44 - 29:48
    it was pretty solid. I kind of knew what I
    would be getting in for.
  • 29:50 - 29:51
    What else?
  • 29:52 - 29:56
    I also vote for the second title. I think
    that's much better.
  • 29:57 - 29:58
    Awesome.
  • 29:59 - 30:01
    Everything else sounds good.
  • 30:07 - 30:12
    All right. Anybody else for feedback or
    sharing their pitch?
  • 30:17 - 30:21
    Mine is still a pretty rough draft. So I..
  • 30:22 - 30:23
    Are you willing to share it?
  • 30:26 - 30:27
    I'm not sure though.
  • 30:28 - 30:33
    Okay. Angela?
  • 30:35 - 30:42
    Yeah, I can share mine. So my title is
    "Building WordPress: Tips for
  • 30:42 - 30:49
    collaborating across time and space." And
    the pitch is, "The WordPress open source
  • 30:49 - 30:54
    project is built by a global diverse
    community. If you've contributed in the
  • 30:54 - 30:58
    past, perhaps something got lost in
    translation. timezones made it impossible
  • 30:58 - 31:04
    to connect. In this session, Angela will
    share some tips for stronger global
  • 31:04 - 31:08
    collaboration when it comes to
    contributing to WordPress. She'll share
  • 31:08 - 31:12
    personal stories where things didn't quite
    go as planned, and how the global teams
  • 31:12 - 31:17
    were still able to move forward, all in
    the hope that you'll feel more prepared to
  • 31:17 - 31:21
    collaborate asynchronously and with a
    greater shared understanding."
  • 31:22 - 31:30
    Awesome. Feedback?Are you willing? Great!
    So the pitch is super solid. I...
  • 31:31 - 31:37
    everything was clear. It sounded really
    engaging to me. Can you repeat the title?
  • 31:37 - 31:39
    For some reason? I did not hear it.
  • 31:40 - 31:46
    I called it "Building WordPress: Tips for
    collaborating across time and space."
  • 31:48 - 31:56
    So I like it. But some refinements I would
    suggest, I think "building WordPress"
  • 31:56 - 32:02
    doesn't address the fact that we are
    talking about the distributed part. And
  • 32:02 - 32:06
    the the part about "across time and
    space." I mean, I'm always thinking
  • 32:06 - 32:11
    "Doctor Who". And also I think I'm not
    really clear from the title, like, from
  • 32:11 - 32:16
    the pitch its totally clear what it is.
    And from the title, I don't quite get it.
  • 32:16 - 32:21
    I think I might use some of the words from
    the pitch in your title instead.
  • 32:23 - 32:29
    I'm struggling to... I feel like my...
    what I want to put into this talk is too
  • 32:29 - 32:31
    broad so I really would like to condense
    more.
  • 32:31 - 32:36
    Okay, yeah. Um, is that something you want
    help with now? Or do you want to just work
  • 32:36 - 32:38
    on that before our session tomorrow?
  • 32:38 - 32:41
    Oh, nope. Not now. My time is expired.
  • 32:42 - 32:48
    We have we have an extra minute or two.
    But yeah. Great. Yeah. So yeah, I think
  • 32:48 - 32:51
    you're really onto it. And I think it's
    just the title just needs a bit of
  • 32:51 - 32:55
    tweaking, or like you said it could be
    reining in the whole thing in a bit. But
  • 32:55 - 32:59
    from the description itself, it sounded
    that part sounds fine to me.
  • 33:00 - 33:08
    I have a question. So can I work on mine?
    And do we have time to go over that
  • 33:08 - 33:09
    tomorrow? Or...?
  • 33:09 - 33:12
    Yeah, we absolutely could go over them
    again tomorrow.
  • 33:13 - 33:14
    Okay.
  • 33:15 - 33:20
    In our last few minutes, I'd actually love
    to hear bios from anybody who had the time
  • 33:20 - 33:27
    and wants to share theirs. I'll let
    Aurooba go first, and then Miriam, and
  • 33:27 - 33:31
    then Bhargav. It'll be about a minute each
    and we'll see if we have time to get
  • 33:31 - 33:32
    through everybody.
  • 33:34 - 33:38
    Okay, I am terrible at bios and I hate
    writing them and every single time I have
  • 33:38 - 33:40
    to write them I want to kill myself a
    little bit.
  • 33:41 - 33:42
    Thank doing it today!
  • 33:43 - 33:48
    No, but that I need help. So any feedback
    you guys give, you folks give, that will
  • 33:48 - 33:54
    be helpful. "Aurooba was the co founder of
    design and development studio Wanderoak.
  • 33:54 - 33:59
    She has been developing bespoke WordPress
    solutions for five plus years and is
  • 33:59 - 34:02
    currently writing a course on WordPress
    theme development. She's the co-organizer
  • 34:03 - 34:06
    of the Calgary WordPress meetup and has
    been helping organize WordCamp Calgary for
  • 34:06 - 34:10
    three years. She loves putting together
    dinner parties and getting lost in a
  • 34:10 - 34:13
    really good book." This is the longest bio
    I've ever written in my life and all I can
  • 34:13 - 34:16
    think is, like "Oh my God, this is too
    braggy."
  • 34:17 - 34:26
    I love it. I have no changes. It is
    succinct. It's really clear. It's
  • 34:26 - 34:33
    friendly. It's... Ship it, in my opinion.
    And I'm seeing Angela's nodding. Any any
  • 34:33 - 34:38
    other thoughts on that? Everyone is
    nodding. Does anybody have any changes to
  • 34:38 - 34:44
    suggest? We all love it. Ship it! Good
    work!
  • 34:44 - 34:50
    Is it maybe like too many things to say or
    no? No,
  • 34:50 - 34:54
    I don't know. I don't think so either. It.
    It sounds good.
  • 34:54 - 34:59
    It felt like the right length. It didn't
    feel like you're going on and on. A lot of
  • 34:59 - 35:04
    people put a lot of stuff in their bio,
    but I felt like it was, you know, economy
  • 35:04 - 35:08
    of words, not too many sentences. It just
    covered everything.
  • 35:08 - 35:11
    Okay. Thank you. I always also feel
    nervous.
  • 35:11 - 35:17
    Bios need to be a bit braggy which is one
    of those things that folks from
  • 35:17 - 35:21
    underrepresented groups tend to not like
    to do that as much. There's a bit of
  • 35:21 - 35:27
    conditioning in the world around that. And
    the over represented population tends, not
  • 35:27 - 35:32
    always, but in general tends to be more
    okay with it. So it's a great opportunity
  • 35:32 - 35:38
    to practice leaning into that, and owning
    some of the awesome shit you've done.
  • 35:40 - 35:41
    Fair enough.
  • 35:43 - 35:49
    We have time for maybe one or two more,
    probably one. Miriam was next.
  • 35:55 - 36:00
    I decided to write a totally new bio other
    the one I've been using, so we'll see how
  • 36:00 - 36:07
    well this one is. So, "Miriam is a web
    developer with 15 years experience and
  • 36:07 - 36:10
    currently works for Pondstone Digital
    marketing. She's been working with
  • 36:10 - 36:15
    WordPress since 2008 and fell in love with
    the community in 2016. Passionate about
  • 36:15 - 36:19
    giving back, she's an organizer for both
    the Ottawa WordPress meetup and WordCamp
  • 36:19 - 36:24
    Ottawa. When not in front of a computer,
    Miriam is either a karate sensei, ballroom
  • 36:24 - 36:28
    dancer, or clarinetist, just not all at
    once, but she's working on it.
  • 36:31 - 36:34
    Awesome. Feedback? Open to it?
  • 36:34 - 36:35
    Oh, you always,
  • 36:36 - 36:44
    Always. Um, again, it is super clear,
    succinct. I am friendly. I liked it. My
  • 36:44 - 36:49
    only feedback is you didn't mention your
    work in our group. And I want you to
  • 36:49 - 36:50
    always mention our group,
  • 36:51 - 36:56
    I didn't know. I have that written down.
    "And she is also involved with the diverse
  • 36:56 - 37:00
    speaker training group as
    between-the-trainers lead." Yeah, I think
  • 37:00 - 37:04
    maybe that's a bit too wordy. Maybe I'll
    just say "she's involved with the diverse
  • 37:04 - 37:06
    speakers training group."
  • 37:08 - 37:11
    That or saying "a leadership position."
  • 37:11 - 37:15
    Leadership position. Yeah. Instead of
    going specific? Yeah.
  • 37:15 - 37:19
    I just want you to be mentioning it.
    Because anytime you're speaking, we'll
  • 37:19 - 37:24
    have at least one spot to have a shout out
    and get our name out there.
  • 37:24 - 37:26
    Now, I mentioned it in Niagara last
    weekend.
  • 37:26 - 37:32
    Yes. Any other comments for Miriam?
  • 37:35 - 37:35
    That's good.
  • 37:38 - 37:41
    Great! I'm sorry, Angela?
  • 37:42 - 37:52
    I agree. It's great. And I think.. add a
    little bit, a little bit more to your
  • 37:52 - 37:57
    experience, because you say you have like
    15 years of experience as a web developer
  • 37:57 - 38:01
    but you didn't specify like one
    experience. You can add, you can add a
  • 38:01 - 38:06
    little more in there. It's 15 years,
    you've got a lot to share.
  • 38:11 - 38:16
    Okay, so where we left off in our session
    was Bhargav was going to share his bio.
  • 38:16 - 38:17
    Did you still want to do that?
  • 38:20 - 38:25
    Yes. We'll proceed with it. Just Yes.
  • 38:27 - 38:27
    Great.
  • 38:27 - 38:29
    So should I stand?
  • 38:29 - 38:31
    Yes. Thanks.
  • 38:33 - 38:40
    I'm currently working as a functional
    consultant at KrishaWeb. Ecommerce
  • 38:40 - 38:47
    increases my dopamine levels. He says
    humming to the melodies of A.R. Rahman is
  • 38:48 - 38:53
    his full time job. Expanding the horizons
    of knowledge by reading is what people
  • 38:53 - 38:58
    will always find him doing. Bhargav is a
    co-organizer for the Ahmedabad WordPress
  • 38:58 - 38:59
    meetup and also WordCamp.
  • 39:02 - 39:05
    Nice! I think... did you want feedback?
  • 39:09 - 39:10
    Yes
  • 39:10 - 39:14
    Awesome. I thought you had some really
    good points in there. It illustrated a lot
  • 39:14 - 39:18
    of, you know, what you do and a little bit
    of your personality. And I think probably
  • 39:18 - 39:23
    just tightening it up a bit. Maybe
    starting with some of your big roles and
  • 39:23 - 39:30
    just saying just a little bit. Probably.
    It'll depend a bit on where you're
  • 39:30 - 39:36
    submitting the bio to. Some of them can be
    more and a little bit more playful and
  • 39:36 - 39:45
    some of them should be really short and
    tight. Any other thoughts? Aurooba!
  • 39:44 - 39:50
    I love the reference to A.R. Rahman. I
    would like to see maybe another sentence
  • 39:50 - 39:57
    about your work. Just to make it a little
    more balanced. I I felt had the feeling
  • 39:57 - 40:03
    that it's the doesn't really share a lot
    about your experience as much. So maybe
  • 40:03 - 40:06
    another sentence about that might help but
    otherwise really good.
  • 40:10 - 40:17
    Anyone else? Great, thanks very much
    Bhargav. And Chandrika, did you work on
  • 40:17 - 40:19
    your pitch and want to share it with us?
  • 40:24 - 40:29
    Okay, my pitch is not ready yet, I tried
    to work on it yesterday, but I just
  • 40:29 - 40:36
    couldn't get it. I just don't like it. So
    I think it's, I know what I want to say,
  • 40:36 - 40:39
    but I just can't put it in words yet. So,
  • 40:39 - 40:44
    okay. Yeah. If you want it to run it past
    us now or another time of whatever you
  • 40:44 - 40:47
    have currently, that's totally fine. And
    otherwise,
  • 40:48 - 41:03
    I could do it. What I have now but it's...
    I really don't like it. Okay, so the title
  • 41:03 - 41:14
    is "Building custom WordPress sites with
    ACF blocks." Um, "ACF provides an easy way
  • 41:14 - 41:19
    to build custom functionalities and
    templates in WordPress sites. Combining
  • 41:19 - 41:25
    this with Gutenberg gives more power to
    the users, your clients. This talk is
  • 41:25 - 41:29
    geared towards beginner developers who
    build custom WordPress sites for their
  • 41:29 - 41:36
    clients. You'll learn how to build ACF
    blocks and how these blocks can be used on
  • 41:36 - 41:38
    multiple sites in different ways."
  • 41:39 - 41:43
    Nice. Did you want thoughts from us once?
    Are you done?
  • 41:43 - 41:45
    No, no, I was done. I was done. I'm done.
  • 41:46 - 41:46
    Awesome
  • 41:46 - 41:48
    It's early. I would love to get feedback.
  • 41:48 - 41:54
    Great. I loved the last few sentences. I
    loved the like, where you specified what
  • 41:54 - 41:59
    people are getting out of it and who the
    talk is for and all those things. And
  • 41:59 - 42:02
    yeah, I think just working on that first
    part, but you already said it was kind of
  • 42:02 - 42:13
    rough. Yeah. Maybe something around? I'm
    not sure right now. It's kind of tough.
  • 42:13 - 42:15
    Does anybody else have thoughts on that?
  • 42:14 - 42:18
    It looks like Aurooba does.
  • 42:19 - 42:20
    Oh, sorry.
  • 42:24 - 42:32
    I think that maybe including who it's for?
    Something about who it's for in the first
  • 42:32 - 42:37
    part will help. And the other thing I
    would probably personally suggest is
  • 42:37 - 42:41
    mentioning that it's ACF Pro, because you
    can't build blocks with the free version
  • 42:41 - 42:42
    way.
  • 42:42 - 42:48
    Okay. Sure. Thank you.
  • 42:49 - 42:54
    I will look forward to hearing the rest of
    that when it's done. Does anybody else
  • 42:54 - 42:58
    have anything they wanted to cover before
    we move on to section number four?
Title:
Diverse Speaker Training Workshop Part 2
Video Language:
English
Duration:
43:00

English subtitles

Revisions