< Return to Video

constantdull: the possibility of an army

  • 0:00 - 0:10
    preroll music
  • 0:10 - 0:16
    Herald: And welcome to this beautiful evening
  • 0:16 - 0:19
    The next talk is very interesting talk.
  • 0:19 - 0:24
    It's actually.. will go to.. tackle some more..
  • 0:24 - 0:28
    quality.. quantity, the army.
  • 0:28 - 0:31
    Actually using an army to have some balance
  • 0:31 - 0:33
    in a way.
  • 0:33 - 0:34
    Not...
  • 0:34 - 0:41
    Yeah, I can actually just say:
    What can an army do if the army
  • 0:41 - 0:48
    was effectively (?) put into action,
    let's say.
  • 0:48 - 0:49
    So.
  • 0:49 - 0:56
    Mr. Constant Dullaart will introduce
    the talk for us today.
  • 0:56 - 1:01
    And please welcome him
    with a warm applause.
  • 1:01 - 1:06
    applause
  • 1:06 - 1:08
    constantdull: First of all, thank you very much
    for joining.
  • 1:08 - 1:10
    It's a great privilege
  • 1:10 - 1:14
    and an honour to speak in this context
    of the great CCC.
  • 1:14 - 1:20
    I'm generally more nervous than
    I would normally be.
  • 1:20 - 1:24
    So, anyway, forgive me if I stutter
    or something, but hopefully I'm not,
  • 1:24 - 1:26
    because I drank some beer.
  • 1:26 - 1:29
    So, also.. so, I built an army.
  • 1:29 - 1:31
    This much is true.
  • 1:31 - 1:35
    And it's nice because we're talking
    about Crypto Wars and about losing the war,
  • 1:35 - 1:36
    and we're talking about all those other
    kinds of stuff.
  • 1:36 - 1:40
    We have all these war analogies,
    so I thought it's also kind of fitting
  • 1:40 - 1:41
    to present an army to you.
  • 1:41 - 1:43
    But I will actually explain to you
  • 1:43 - 1:45
    how I got there.
  • 1:45 - 1:47
    So some people might know me
    from works like these,
  • 1:47 - 1:51
    which is.. which doesn't have sound.
  • 1:51 - 1:53
    Ahm.. laughing
  • 1:53 - 1:54
    I think it did originally.
  • 1:54 - 1:56
    But anyway, this is the Revolving Internet.
  • 1:56 - 1:58
    I made it in 2010.
  • 1:58 - 2:03
    So, making jokes of pre-existing web content,
    which is a company called Google,
  • 2:03 - 2:07
    that a lot of people seem to
    keep talking about.
  • 2:07 - 2:09
    I twisted it around.
  • 2:09 - 2:12
    So I made the internet revolve,
  • 2:12 - 2:17
    just like the world rotates,
    I guess.
  • 2:17 - 2:20
    And then I made this other thing,
    which is called the death of the URL,
  • 2:20 - 2:23
    because the URLs died,
    and this is one of the first things
  • 2:23 - 2:27
    where it's actually a XXX domain name,
    which was the first attempt to organize
  • 2:27 - 2:31
    all the URLs so it would be easier to block
    on porn content.
  • 2:31 - 2:36
    But then I just.. yeah, you see what happens,
    you know, that's happening.
  • 2:36 - 2:39
    So I basically changed the title.
  • 2:39 - 2:40
    Normally the referrer is..
  • 2:40 - 2:45
    The referrer is actually in the title bar
    as a URL, but now
  • 2:45 - 2:50
    the title is actually in the page,
    and ah.. yeah, you get it.
  • 2:50 - 2:55
    Yeah, so that's.. or I would like an
    encrypted treasure map
  • 2:55 - 2:58
    and this treasure map is actually
    weirdly enough sold
  • 2:58 - 3:02
    for like a lot of money in New York
    in an auction house just because
  • 3:02 - 3:09
    it points to another treasure island,
    where the fictive or maybe real treasure
  • 3:09 - 3:14
    of Lima is buried and now there is an
    actual exhibition buried.
  • 3:14 - 3:18
    But.. and also I started a company
    recently, DullTech,
  • 3:18 - 3:21
    because I want technology to be more dull.
  • 3:21 - 3:22
    laughing
  • 3:22 - 3:25
    Because I think technology is perceived
    to be exciting while it's not,
  • 3:25 - 3:29
    so it should just be dull as fuck
    as it is.
  • 3:29 - 3:31
    Yeah.
  • 3:31 - 3:32
    So..
  • 3:32 - 3:33
    This is actually a..
  • 3:33 - 3:38
    I also retrieved the very first image
    that was ever photoshopped,
  • 3:38 - 3:41
    which I was quite happy about finding.
  • 3:41 - 3:44
    And then I decided to write an..
    oh, actually I didn't put a timer.
  • 3:44 - 3:47
    So anyway, I'll see notes.. ahm.
  • 3:47 - 3:48
    So this is..
  • 3:48 - 3:51
    I wrote a letter to her,
    to the protagonist in this picture, Jennifer,
  • 3:51 - 3:54
    and I'll read you the letter right now.
  • 3:54 - 3:58
    Dear Jennifer, sometime in 1988,
    through a sitting-in on the beach
  • 3:58 - 4:00
    in Bora-Bora looking at to Opua island,
    enjoying your holiday
  • 4:00 - 4:03
    with a very serious boyfriend.
  • 4:03 - 4:05
    The serious boyfriend, John,
  • 4:05 - 4:09
    took a photograph of you sitting
    on the beach not wearing your bikini top.
  • 4:09 - 4:13
    John later became your husband
    and father to your children
  • 4:13 - 4:17
    Sara, Lisa, Alex and Jane.
  • 4:17 - 4:22
    John, if you're watching this, hi.
  • 4:22 - 4:24
    This photograph of a beautiful moment
    in your personal history
  • 4:24 - 4:28
    has also become a part of my history
    and that of many other people.
  • 4:28 - 4:32
    It has even shaped our outlooks
    on the world at large.
  • 4:32 - 4:36
    John's image of you became the very first
    photograph to be publicly altered
  • 4:36 - 4:39
    by the most influential image
    manipulation program ever.
  • 4:39 - 4:42
    Of course, this is why I know the names
    of your children and this is also
  • 4:42 - 4:50
    why I know you're trying to do cool things
    trying to get a .green toplevel domain name.
  • 4:50 - 4:53
    Anyway, personally I believe that the importance
    of the domain name has been reduced
  • 4:53 - 4:59
    to a nostalgic poetic value,
    but that doesn't matter now.
  • 4:59 - 5:01
    I still wonder if you felt the world
    changed there on that beach,
  • 5:01 - 5:05
    the fact that reality would be more moldable,
    that normal people could change their history,
  • 5:05 - 5:11
    brighten up their past and put
    twirl effects on their faces.
  • 5:11 - 5:14
    That holiday image became the very first
    photograph publicly manipulated
  • 5:14 - 5:17
    in Photoshop,
    and your intimate beach moment
  • 5:17 - 5:20
    became the reality for several
    potential clients to play with.
  • 5:20 - 5:25
    2 Jennifers, no Jennifer, less clouds etc.
  • 5:25 - 5:29
    And in essence it was the
    very first Photoshop meme.
  • 5:29 - 5:33
    But now the image is nowhere
    to be found online.
  • 5:33 - 5:36
    Did John ask you if he could use
    this particular image?
  • 5:36 - 5:39
    Did you enjoy seeing yourself
    on a screen as much as he did?
  • 5:39 - 5:44
    Did you ever think you would be the muse
    that would inspire so much contemporary
  • 5:44 - 5:46
    image making?
  • 5:46 - 5:49
    Did you ever print out the image yourself?
  • 5:49 - 5:53
    Would you be willing to share
    the image with me, and, if so,
  • 5:53 - 5:58
    with the other people to whom it took
    on such an unexpected significance?
  • 5:58 - 6:02
    Shouldn't the Smithsonian or any other
    large institution have the negative
  • 6:02 - 6:08
    of that image, not to mention digital
    backups of its endless variations?
  • 6:08 - 6:13
    All these questions have made me decide
    to redistribute the image, 'Jennifer in Paradise',
  • 6:13 - 6:18
    as well as I can, somewhat as an artist,
    somewhat as a digital archaeologist,
  • 6:18 - 6:22
    restoring what few traces
    of it I could find,
  • 6:22 - 6:26
    restoring the image from what was available
    to everyone in the somewhat public space
  • 6:26 - 6:28
    of the internet.
  • 6:28 - 6:33
    It was sad to realize this blurry screengrab
    was the closest I could get to the image,
  • 6:33 - 6:36
    but beautiful at the same time.
  • 6:36 - 6:40
    How often do you find an important
    image that is not online
  • 6:40 - 6:43
    in several different sizes already?
  • 6:43 - 6:45
    This beautiful artifact
    of software development
  • 6:45 - 6:48
    has become an artwork in this way,
    in which you, or at least your depiction
  • 6:48 - 6:54
    play a central part in a body of work
    that has become very dear to me,
  • 6:54 - 6:57
    a faint blurry pixelated focal point,
  • 6:57 - 7:01
    a work that celebrates a time when
    you were young and the world was young
  • 7:01 - 7:06
    as it still naively believed in the
    authenticity of the photograph.
  • 7:06 - 7:09
    Sometimes, when I'm anxious about
    the future of our surveilled
  • 7:09 - 7:11
    computer-mediated world,
  • 7:11 - 7:16
    when I worry about cultural imperialism
    and the politics behind software design,
  • 7:16 - 7:21
    I imagine myself travelling back in
    time, just like the Terminator,
  • 7:21 - 7:25
    to that important moment in technological
    world history,
  • 7:25 - 7:29
    there on that beach in Bora-Bora,
    and just sit there with you,
  • 7:29 - 7:31
    watching the tide roll away.
  • 7:31 - 7:34
    Sincerly, Constant Dullaart.
  • 7:34 - 7:36
    So, Jennifer never responded.
  • 7:36 - 7:38
    Thank you.
  • 7:38 - 7:42
    laughingapplause
  • 7:42 - 7:45
    So, Jennifer never responded,
    but the cool thing was..
  • 7:45 - 7:48
    So this was basically an anecdote
    in Adobe's history, right,
  • 7:48 - 7:52
    so there was some talk about this
    picture, but I couldn't find it online,
  • 7:52 - 7:55
    and it was in a video which
    I'll briefly show later.
  • 7:55 - 8:01
    So, I restored it and I redistributed it
    with this letter as an open letter.
  • 8:01 - 8:03
    But of course I'm..
  • 8:03 - 8:06
    I put a payload
    in the jpg.
  • 8:06 - 8:11
    I stuck in and graphically encrypted
    some messages in different versions
  • 8:11 - 8:16
    of this jpg because I also wanted
    to discuss that a jpg, of course,
  • 8:16 - 8:21
    isn't only a way to distribute images,
    but it's also the container
  • 8:21 - 8:26
    of the jpg, and especially if you
    stuck in a graphically.. inject content,
  • 8:26 - 8:32
    it actually becomes a unique container
    discussing the thereoality (?) of
  • 8:32 - 8:35
    digital photography besides, like..
  • 8:35 - 8:36
    I mean, a lot of me.. as an artist,
  • 8:36 - 8:40
    like I still have to do with a lot of people
    discussing paper and discussing prints,
  • 8:40 - 8:43
    and like discussing the value of a file,
    if you can copy it and this kind of bullshit,
  • 8:43 - 8:48
    and in the end, I needed to emphasize
    the fact that like, this image also wasn't
  • 8:48 - 8:49
    mine,
  • 8:49 - 8:50
    I just redistributed it.
  • 8:50 - 8:55
    So actually, the only thing that's for sale
    as an artwork, as this, is the password
  • 8:55 - 9:02
    to actually access the content
    I injected into it.
  • 9:02 - 9:05
    And then of course you get these questions
    of institutions, like, how do we show this
  • 9:05 - 9:08
    in a space?
  • 9:08 - 9:10
    So this is, like, working predominantly online,
  • 9:10 - 9:13
    this is the question I get most of the time.
  • 9:13 - 9:16
    Constant, how do we show this
    in your exhibition?
  • 9:16 - 9:21
    So.. mostly I just take really stupid
    analogies, and they work.
  • 9:21 - 9:26
    So, here of course I used UV paint,
    and I just, ah, the text,
  • 9:26 - 9:32
    which is.. well.. maybe it's an image,
    but the text that was encrypted
  • 9:32 - 9:37
    in that Jennifer in Paradise image
    is now painted with UV paint on there,
  • 9:37 - 9:42
    and I would read it as a performance.
  • 9:49 - 9:52
    And then, of course, because I
    wanted to sell the passwords,
  • 9:52 - 9:55
    I wanted the access to be the commodity,
    right, so if you're.. like,
  • 9:55 - 9:59
    within art you're always thinking about
    a commodity, people wanna own something,
  • 9:59 - 10:03
    they wanna have a cultural gesture,
    which they can..
  • 10:03 - 10:05
    yeah, which they can own, basically.
  • 10:05 - 10:09
    And then, as an artist you're
    entitled to do dramatic gestures.
  • 10:09 - 10:13
    Or at least, I feel like I was entitled
    to do dramatic gestures.
  • 10:13 - 10:17
    laughing
  • 10:17 - 10:20
    And to close down the access
    to the encrypted contents
  • 10:20 - 10:24
    I had to destroy..
    laughing
  • 10:24 - 10:27
    .. anyway, I don't advise
    you doing that at home
  • 10:27 - 10:33
    because apparently it's
    poisonous or whatever..
  • 10:33 - 10:36
    laughingapplause
  • 10:36 - 10:39
    So this basically meant that the people..
    shouting from the audience, laughs
  • 10:39 - 10:46
    so this basically meant that the people
    that wanted access to that content
  • 10:46 - 10:52
    needed to, or buy new UV lights, or they
    needed to buy the password to the file.
  • 10:52 - 10:55
    The cool thing is that John,
    after a while, did respond,
  • 10:55 - 10:58
    because it was.. the Wall Street Journal
    started to write about it,
  • 10:58 - 11:01
    and the Wall Street Journal he did find
    worthy to reply, not my, of course,
  • 11:01 - 11:06
    my skanky little emails writing
    the big developer.
  • 11:06 - 11:10
    But anyway, he did reply,
    and he was actually super-generous,
  • 11:10 - 11:13
    and he was actually.. he was saying like,
    you should have asked me,
  • 11:13 - 11:15
    but he gave a lot of info, like
    on which scanner he scanned
  • 11:15 - 11:18
    that first image on, and
    like he went to.. app,
  • 11:18 - 11:23
    but he also said, like,
    that he distributed it
  • 11:23 - 11:27
    to other people under a strict
    non-disclosure agreement,
  • 11:27 - 11:30
    which I'll prove to you later that it's..
    that that's.. not true.
  • 11:30 - 11:31
    Anyway, but..
  • 11:31 - 11:35
    I pointed out what is funny,
    which is.. it says it's one of the first images
  • 11:35 - 11:37
    to be photoshopped.
  • 11:37 - 11:39
    I guess that is a word now.
  • 11:39 - 11:43
    So, I'm really happy that I actually have
    an email to prove the moment
  • 11:43 - 11:46
    when the guy that made up 'photoshop'
    figures out that 'photoshopping'
  • 11:46 - 11:47
    had become a verb.
  • 11:47 - 11:48
    laughing
  • 11:48 - 11:53
    Anyway.. and also, like, he used
    a 24-bits colour image.
  • 11:53 - 11:56
    So, I don't know, any of you ever
    using 24-bits colour images?
  • 11:56 - 12:00
    I don't, but.. maybe you do.
  • 12:00 - 12:06
    But the cool thing also that he
    needed to transport the image
  • 12:06 - 12:11
    on separate floppy disks to save
    the red, green and blue channels,
  • 12:11 - 12:13
    which I also thought was
    quite remarkable.
  • 12:13 - 12:17
    Anyway, of course.. like, this image
    is really important because it was
  • 12:17 - 12:20
    one of the first digital images
    at that time for people to use
  • 12:20 - 12:23
    manipulating in Photoshop,
    because it's 1988,
  • 12:23 - 12:25
    so there's no web, there's no
    digital images distribution
  • 12:25 - 12:29
    or wide availability of it,
    no digital cameras,
  • 12:29 - 12:32
    so they needed to find that
    as a source.
  • 12:32 - 12:33
    So this is the demo,actually,
    where I got it from.
  • 12:33 - 12:35
    John: So I start with it and open up..
    constantdull: This is John
  • 12:35 - 12:40
    John: an image of .. This is a tourist picture
    I took of my wife when we were on a vacation
  • 12:40 - 12:41
    in Tahiti.
  • 12:41 - 12:43
    This is from Bora-Bora.
  • 12:43 - 12:46
    I used this image for doing
    a lot of the demonstrations
  • 12:46 - 12:53
    including the first demonstrations
    that I did at Adobe Systems.
  • 12:53 - 12:55
    So I have opened a 24-bit image.
  • 12:55 - 12:58
    We're looking at it on an 8-bit display,
  • 12:58 - 13:03
    but you can still manipulate
    the 24-bit image.
  • 13:03 - 13:07
    So I'm gonna start by cloning Jennifer,
    so I'm gonna start by just...
  • 13:07 - 13:10
    constantdull: Okay, I'm just gonna mute
    John out for a bit,
  • 13:10 - 13:12
    because it's super interesting,
    but you can watch the video later.
  • 13:12 - 13:14
    The thing is that of course he's
    cloning his wife,
  • 13:14 - 13:17
    he asked her to marry her
    the very next day after this picture.
  • 13:17 - 13:21
    I'm just saying he's confirming
    a very age-old cultural stigma
  • 13:21 - 13:24
    of a man objectifying
    the female body,
  • 13:24 - 13:26
    and I thought that this was really..
    laughing
  • 13:26 - 13:29
    .. I mean the fact that he is
    cloning his wife, and showing that
  • 13:29 - 13:32
    as a tool to his potential customers..
    laughing
  • 13:32 - 13:35
    ..seriously, what the fuck,
    why didn't he use a bike,
  • 13:35 - 13:37
    or a turtle or something.
  • 13:37 - 13:38
    laughing
  • 13:38 - 13:41
    John: Copy.. paste.
  • 13:41 - 13:44
    applause
  • 13:44 - 13:50
    John: And now I have a clone.
  • 13:50 - 13:51
    constantdull: Anyway, so..
  • 13:51 - 13:53
    I've been using
    that image now because I felt
  • 13:53 - 13:56
    like I'd made, you know,
    a new perception of that copy,
  • 13:56 - 13:59
    and I've been using that into
    different works
  • 13:59 - 14:01
    where I'm just rotating it through
    all the different photoshop filters
  • 14:01 - 14:03
    that are available.
  • 14:03 - 14:07
    So you get these kind of images,
    and you get like these.. little presentations
  • 14:07 - 14:09
    where I like liquefy Jennifer
    all over the place,
  • 14:09 - 14:13
    like LitraAlt ?
    You know, and there's all these
  • 14:13 - 14:17
    like, images, because of course
    I'm turning this image into
  • 14:17 - 14:19
    a ubiquitous kind of image
    that's everywhere.
  • 14:19 - 14:24
    So I want to take it out of the idea
    that it's not visible everywhere.
  • 14:24 - 14:28
    But the cool thing is that finally then
    John actually responded again,
  • 14:28 - 14:30
    and that was in the Guardian,
    and the cool thing is
  • 14:30 - 14:34
    that, where before it was under
    a so-called non-disclosure agreement,
  • 14:34 - 14:39
    which actually my lawyer told me
    that it's an implicit license he gave
  • 14:39 - 14:40
    because he gave it to other people.
  • 14:40 - 14:45
    Anyway, but the cool thing is that he
    gave actually the real image
  • 14:45 - 14:46
    to the Guardian.
  • 14:46 - 14:48
    So now everybody has access
  • 14:48 - 14:50
    to that first actual image.
  • 14:50 - 14:52
    So I found like I still pride myself
  • 14:52 - 14:55
    in kind of tricking him into
    releasing that first image,
  • 14:55 - 14:57
    where it was first like
    a personal image,
  • 14:57 - 15:00
    and now actually justified
    to him that the world had
  • 15:00 - 15:04
    a right to see that very first image
    and to read that very first image
  • 15:04 - 15:08
    as an important image in
    photographic world history.
  • 15:08 - 15:11
    So I'm kinda happy that this is
    now available for everyone
  • 15:11 - 15:15
    to fuck with.
  • 15:15 - 15:18
    So, this is Jennifer now,
    or about 3 years ago.
  • 15:18 - 15:20
    She's.. yeah.
  • 15:20 - 15:21
    This is her.
  • 15:21 - 15:23
    I don't have anything to
    say about this.
  • 15:23 - 15:25
    laughing
  • 15:25 - 15:29
    And also the nice thing is.. nonono,
    also, I did want to like ask them..
  • 15:29 - 15:31
    augh, 15 minutes, thank you.
  • 15:31 - 15:35
    I also wanted to.. this means
    I have to hurry up.
  • 15:35 - 15:39
    I actually wanted to take them back
    to Bora-Bora on like a holiday
  • 15:39 - 15:42
    and retake that picture, right,
    so.. and then they perceived it
  • 15:42 - 15:45
    weirdly enough as an indecent proposal.
  • 15:45 - 15:47
    They said, like, oh, nonono, that's not ok.
  • 15:47 - 15:49
    And then I thought, like, maybe
    they are prudes because she's like
  • 15:49 - 15:53
    half naked in the picture and she thought
    I would wanna see her naked again,
  • 15:53 - 15:55
    which I never.. like, I thought of later.
  • 15:55 - 15:59
    Anyway, but now, if you google her,
    you get like the first response are..
  • 15:59 - 16:03
    like, the first result is my letter to her,
    which is still very nice,
  • 16:03 - 16:04
    so I hope she read it by now.
  • 16:04 - 16:05
    laughing
  • 16:05 - 16:09
    But to be honest I only
    conversed with her husband
  • 16:09 - 16:14
    and she never replied which I
    also think is a bit weird.
  • 16:14 - 16:17
    Yeah, so.. laughing that.
  • 16:17 - 16:22
    As an artist, I think I'm in the business
    of turning this into like a more
  • 16:22 - 16:27
    intricate version of this
    and then calling it art.
  • 16:27 - 16:31
    So, I was invited to do an
    exhibition about clowns
  • 16:31 - 16:35
    and I gave this press image,
    and this is actually a..
  • 16:35 - 16:39
    an artist, Marina Abramovic, that maybe
    somebody would know,
  • 16:39 - 16:42
    and it's Klaus Biesenbach, who is
    like some kind of curator.
  • 16:42 - 16:45
    And here is them with more curators.
  • 16:45 - 16:52
    And here is Ai Weiwei
    with naked children, which is awkward.
  • 16:52 - 16:56
    Now, it's not.. it's not.. it's
    a joke, it's a joke, sorry.
  • 16:56 - 17:01
    So.. ok, I just have to
    catch my breath.
  • 17:01 - 17:04
    So, this is weird, right,
    like now on Instagram,
  • 17:04 - 17:09
    like, Instagram is actually
    starting to influence
  • 17:09 - 17:11
    how the artworld works.
  • 17:11 - 17:13
    So you would see an artist,
    you'd see the amount of followers.
  • 17:13 - 17:15
    This is a collector, for example,
    and you would see or be
  • 17:15 - 17:17
    the circle of relevance (?).
    Like, if they have a certain amounts
  • 17:17 - 17:22
    of followers, you would think, like,
    ok, that kind of quantitative validation,
  • 17:22 - 17:26
    or like, this quantified social validation
    might suggest the kind of access
  • 17:26 - 17:29
    to like a social capital, s
    that they're more
  • 17:29 - 17:31
    relevant as a collector or as an artist.
  • 17:31 - 17:34
    And like you'd get these collectors
    that are posing in front of their artworks
  • 17:34 - 17:38
    to generate more relevance
    for their artworks.
  • 17:38 - 17:42
    And in the end I was thinking,
    if that relevance actually starts ..
  • 17:42 - 17:45
    if that social capital, that quantification
    of social capital actually starts
  • 17:45 - 17:48
    to represent actual capital,
    like in the art world,
  • 17:48 - 17:53
    but in a lot of other places,
    then why not buy that capital.
  • 17:53 - 17:55
    And of course like, if you just do
    a simple search online
  • 17:55 - 18:00
    you can buy Facebook followers,
    Instagram followers, everywhere.
  • 18:00 - 18:04
    So... and then, I started to research
    these followers,
  • 18:04 - 18:07
    and these followers were all automated,
    right, like, this was their content,
  • 18:07 - 18:09
    this were the pictures they're posting.
  • 18:09 - 18:12
    So you would get these like kinda
    automated pictures where it says..
  • 18:12 - 18:18
    this has the hashtag 'instadroid',
    but weirdly cropped-off heads
  • 18:18 - 18:19
    in the image.
  • 18:19 - 18:24
    This also..
    reminiscence with weirdly cropped-off heads
  • 18:24 - 18:25
    in the image.
  • 18:25 - 18:28
    And of course, this means
    it's just an automatically cropped image
  • 18:28 - 18:36
    because of the at that time dominant-square
    format of instagram pictures.
  • 18:36 - 18:39
    So, the tag is 'relax' with another few
    heads missing.
  • 18:39 - 18:41
    'Marathon'..
  • 18:41 - 18:43
    I never knew you could do
    a marathon with a snowboard,
  • 18:43 - 18:44
    but, whatever.
  • 18:44 - 18:47
    So.. laughing
    this is all, like, generated, right,
  • 18:47 - 18:50
    and then you even have the bios,
    the bios are ripped from other people
  • 18:50 - 18:51
    and then manipulated.
  • 18:51 - 18:53
    So maybe a lot of you people
    would know this already,
  • 18:53 - 18:58
    but I thought it was really, like,
    genuinely awesome poetry,
  • 18:58 - 19:02
    or found poetry, where..
    this is Jonalan, and Jonalan says
  • 19:02 - 19:11
    ":) I'll prove to the world that I would ecome
    somehin imporant to they ned someday."
  • 19:11 - 19:14
    So I think thats..
    and Darsed says "I love so much asteniber."
  • 19:14 - 19:17
    laughing
  • 19:17 - 19:23
    And.. anyway, I'll skip this, or..
    "simple n pretty n paid"
  • 19:23 - 19:24
    This is also weird.
  • 19:24 - 19:29
    Gondar is
    "mchanical engineer 29 years old, raduated
  • 19:29 - 19:32
    from ITM in 2007"
  • 19:32 - 19:37
    I think the original bio reads MIT,
    but I'm not sure.
  • 19:37 - 19:39
    And this is one of my favourites,
    where it says:
  • 19:39 - 19:42
    "Myna isRoxi, I like it be fancy."
  • 19:42 - 19:45
    laughing
  • 19:45 - 19:49
    "phot, vieo hort poems blogger,
    web edditing"
  • 19:49 - 19:53
    Anyway, so this is another artist,
    maybe you know him, Jeff Koons,
  • 19:53 - 19:57
    he was also fresh on Instagram,
    and you know what I did,
  • 19:57 - 20:05
    I thought like if I can buy these followers,
    you know, if I can find Jeff Koons,
  • 20:05 - 20:08
    why not actually inject some capital
    into these people and inject
  • 20:08 - 20:13
    some social capital, and I decided to buy
    2.5 million instagram followers.
  • 20:13 - 20:15
    laughing
  • 20:15 - 20:19
    Because I had a budget from some
    institution and I donated these.. laughing
  • 20:19 - 20:22
    I donated these followers to
    all these artists, right,
  • 20:22 - 20:26
    because if these artists wanna
    kind of compare length of their dicks,
  • 20:26 - 20:30
    to like follower numbers, then why not
    make them all as equal?
  • 20:30 - 20:40
    laughing So..
    applause
  • 20:40 - 20:41
    Thank you.
  • 20:41 - 20:43
    So Jeff Koons had 100,000 followers.
  • 20:43 - 20:47
    Jerry Saltz who is a critic
    also got 100,000 followers.
  • 20:47 - 20:50
    Klaus Biesenbach got 100,000 followers.
  • 20:50 - 20:53
    Richard Prince got 100,000 followers.
  • 20:53 - 20:55
    This Murakami got 100,000 followers.
  • 20:55 - 20:58
    Jonas Lund, a friend of mine,
    got 100,000 followers.
  • 20:58 - 21:03
    All these people got 100,000 followers
    exactly, so they were equal to each other.
  • 21:03 - 21:12
    laughingwhoopingclapping
  • 21:12 - 21:17
    So basically I became the Lenin
    of social media, right?
  • 21:17 - 21:19
    laughing
  • 21:19 - 21:23
    Injecting capital making people
    equal is what I do.
  • 21:23 - 21:28
    So.. this is.. but the weird thing was
    that the New York Times called me
  • 21:28 - 21:32
    and I'm like, holy fuck, NYT is calling me,
    it's on the phone, on this shitty little
  • 21:32 - 21:35
    freephone, or fairphone, like on..
    audience: Yeah!
  • 21:35 - 21:38
    Heh, exactly, fairphone.. laughing
    there's the New York Times, right.
  • 21:38 - 21:41
    So I'm thinking, this is relevant.
  • 21:41 - 21:42
    And she keeps asking me
  • 21:42 - 21:45
    - I'm hurrying up -, like,
    she's asking me, like, yeah, but like,
  • 21:45 - 21:48
    do you know other people that are
    selling artworks for Instagram,
  • 21:48 - 21:51
    and like, did you make money
    for Instagram, and I'm like,
  • 21:51 - 21:55
    that's.. like, what I'm criticizing, like,
    this is not what the work is about, like,
  • 21:55 - 21:58
    I'm not actually telling you like
    maybe somebody won't spot
  • 21:58 - 22:02
    a work of mine through Instagram,
    but that's, like, I'm saying, like this..
  • 22:02 - 22:06
    validation system of you thinking
    an artwork is important is corrupt.
  • 22:06 - 22:07
    It's vulnerable.
  • 22:07 - 22:09
    It's a system that's
    fucked, and it's a commercial system
  • 22:09 - 22:12
    that we're buying into and you
    shouldn't believe it.
  • 22:12 - 22:16
    So the funny thing was that
    in this article she quoted Simon de Pury
  • 22:16 - 22:20
    as an auctioneer and she quoted
    his follower number to mention
  • 22:20 - 22:22
    how important he was.
  • 22:22 - 22:23
    laughing
  • 22:23 - 22:25
    But I bought that guy..
  • 22:25 - 22:28
    I bought that motherfucker,
    like, how many followers?
  • 22:28 - 22:31
    laughing
    25,000 followers, so why the fuck
  • 22:31 - 22:35
    did the New York Times quote, you know,
    that actual number to inject..
  • 22:35 - 22:38
    like, to mention some kind of
    relevance for that auctioneer.
  • 22:38 - 22:42
    The same with Ai Weiwei, they also quoted
    like how many followers they had,
  • 22:42 - 22:45
    like, I own these followers.
  • 22:45 - 22:47
    laughing
  • 22:47 - 22:51
    Anyway, so we're in a world..
    we're in a world that these kind of images,
  • 22:51 - 22:55
    this is the most-liked image,
    that this is gonna be our culture.
  • 22:55 - 22:59
    That this is gonna be the most relevant
    image, because this is the most liked.
  • 22:59 - 23:01
    And that's a shitty place to be.
  • 23:01 - 23:02
    You know.
  • 23:02 - 23:03
    We need to have
  • 23:03 - 23:06
    other tools to talk about the value
    of images, to talk about our culture,
  • 23:06 - 23:09
    and not get trapped into these stigmas.
  • 23:09 - 23:13
    So as an artist we need other tools
    to just make, you know, reversed thumbs,
  • 23:13 - 23:16
    we need another way to reflect
    on that landscape.
  • 23:16 - 23:17
    So then you have..
  • 23:17 - 23:21
    I'm not gonna explain
    technically, but you..
  • 23:21 - 23:22
    laughing
  • 23:22 - 23:26
    So, Friend Bomber, Mass Planner,
    all these little things, and I got information
  • 23:26 - 23:30
    because I was asked for the..
  • 23:30 - 23:35
    I was asked for Schirn, Kunsthalle Frankfurt,
  • 23:35 - 23:38
    to do another project, and they gave
    me some money, and Schirn Frankfurt
  • 23:38 - 23:40
    is based in Hessen.
  • 23:40 - 23:45
    And Hessen delivered the soldiers to
    fight the first American revolution.
  • 23:45 - 23:48
    So I thought it would be more than
    fitting to bring them back to life
  • 23:48 - 23:50
    and fight this American revolution.
  • 23:50 - 23:51
    So I took all the names from
  • 23:51 - 23:55
    the actual Hessian soldiers that fought
    in the United States, were paid by the British,
  • 23:55 - 23:59
    and actually with that money the very first
    contemporary art museum was funded,
  • 23:59 - 24:02
    the Fridericianum.
  • 24:02 - 24:05
    Anyway, 1780,
    all these names I got through
  • 24:05 - 24:09
    the wonderful Landesgeschichte
    information system, but also the professor
  • 24:09 - 24:10
    that helped me.
  • 24:10 - 24:16
    So, these are all the accounts
    that I made active.
  • 24:16 - 24:19
    laughing
  • 24:19 - 24:23
    But the weird thing was that all these accounts,
    like, a lot of these were created in Pakistan,
  • 24:23 - 24:27
    also, they were actually manually crafted,
    also, I had like automated ones,
  • 24:27 - 24:31
    but also tried.. this guy.. have manually
    crafted ones.
  • 24:31 - 24:35
    And then these pictures showed up,
    and I actually had to explain them,
  • 24:35 - 24:41
    like, the Hessian soldiers were white,
    and like I shouldn't have like non-white.
  • 24:41 - 24:44
    like, passport pictures on there.
  • 24:44 - 24:46
    And then, when.. but then actually,
  • 24:46 - 24:49
    when I was typing this in Skype,
    weirdly enough all these people
  • 24:49 - 24:53
    use Skype, which I thought was very weird,
    knowing what we know,
  • 24:53 - 24:56
    but anyway, it felt so weird to ask that
    and say, like, could you please
  • 24:56 - 25:00
    use white images, that
    I'd stopped asking that.
  • 25:00 - 25:04
    So, if somebody talks to me
    about, like, the conceptual error,
  • 25:04 - 25:09
    why the artificial army isn't all white,
    it's because I don't give a fuck anymore,
  • 25:09 - 25:15
    and I don't wanna ask somebody in Pakistan
    to only use white images, cause it's fucked.
  • 25:15 - 25:17
    applause
  • 25:17 - 25:22
    Anyway, so of course because it's..
    thank you.
  • 25:22 - 25:24
    Because it's also of course like,
    it's very weird that we're using this
  • 25:24 - 25:30
    kind of like system where it's like...
    a lot of this kind of artificial capital,
  • 25:30 - 25:34
    of this artificial social capital is crafted
    in lower wage countries,
  • 25:34 - 25:37
    and we're actually supporting a system
    by buying these followers
  • 25:37 - 25:43
    and buying this kind of black hat SEO shit,
    with like having a very large groups of people
  • 25:43 - 25:49
    crafting this kind of.. these kind of accounts,
    and.. anyway, I think there's ..
  • 25:49 - 25:52
    a kind of messy thing, but the nice thing
    about like using army as an analogy
  • 25:52 - 25:56
    is that it brought me onto BBC News.
  • 25:56 - 25:58
    And this is also really funny,
    because I think this is again
  • 25:58 - 25:59
    like the value of..
  • 25:59 - 26:02
    I could've said, like, I make a..
  • 26:02 - 26:05
    like a large collection of
    phone verified accounts,
  • 26:05 - 26:10
    but I think by saying I made
    a fake army, or I made an army,
  • 26:10 - 26:12
    got me on the news and then
    the funny thing is that actually
  • 26:12 - 26:17
    although it's been on the news
    and in the Guardian again,
  • 26:17 - 26:22
    the nice thing is over half of
    the army is still alive.
  • 26:22 - 26:26
    So they're still out there, I'm still
    distributing likes,
  • 26:26 - 26:27
    I'm still using that.
  • 26:27 - 26:28
    If you would want to help me,
  • 26:28 - 26:31
    please give me.. if you have like
    spare Facebook accounts,
  • 26:31 - 26:34
    which I hope you don't,
    if you do, fuck Facebook,
  • 26:34 - 26:40
    get the fuck out of there,
    but also, if you do have them,
  • 26:40 - 26:44
    give them to me and please accept
    the friends of like another 1000 soldiers
  • 26:44 - 26:47
    and the next few thousand soldiers
    that I'm gonna make,
  • 26:47 - 26:49
    and let's create some social noise.
  • 26:49 - 26:52
    Let's create some social noise
    of like.. and fight this kind of
  • 26:52 - 26:57
    weird artificial system of like
    quality validation through..
  • 26:57 - 27:02
    through this kind of artificial social
    measurement system.
  • 27:02 - 27:04
    So yeah, like.. fuck Facebook.
  • 27:04 - 27:10
    Anyway, I'll just play with a short piece
    of.. is that a zero or do I have like
  • 27:10 - 27:12
    a few more minutes left?
  • 27:12 - 27:13
    Ok.
  • 27:13 - 27:15
    So I'll play a short.. a brief part
  • 27:15 - 27:20
    of my video would like..
    my call to war, let's say.
  • 27:20 - 27:24
    phone ringing
    This is not a part of the video.
  • 27:24 - 27:26
    laughing
  • 27:26 - 27:30
    [voice] Hi and welcome to our tutorial.
  • 27:30 - 27:34
    [voice] In this video, we will show you how
    to create identities through the quick star
  • 27:34 - 27:40
    wizard.
  • 27:40 - 27:57
    trumpet playing, yelling
  • 27:57 - 28:33
    energetic brass instrumental music
  • 28:33 - 28:36
    applause
  • 28:36 - 28:38
    constantdull: Yeah, thank you very much.
  • 28:38 - 28:45
    applause
  • 28:45 - 28:51
    So, yeah, if there's questions, I would just
    like to say, at the end of the project
  • 28:51 - 28:53
    I'll also release like a..
    of course, like the
  • 28:53 - 28:55
    cool little graphs that you see
  • 28:55 - 29:00
    when you hit the BBC how many profiles
    were deleted by Facebook, and how,
  • 29:00 - 29:05
    and like.. and you'll see like how many
    little like attacks sparked which..
  • 29:05 - 29:07
    how many deletions,
    and these kind of things.
  • 29:07 - 29:13
    But, again, if you could help me
    have these fake identities
  • 29:13 - 29:17
    infiltrate the real world with the
    real identities and let them
  • 29:17 - 29:20
    mash up together, I would be
    very grateful for this project.
  • 29:20 - 29:25
    Herald: I would also like to boost up
    my Instagram, my Twitter, my Facebook too.
  • 29:25 - 29:28
    constantdull: Oh, you want more followers?
    Herald: Yeah!
  • 29:28 - 29:28
    constantdull: Oh yeah, ok.
    Herald: Please.
  • 29:28 - 29:29
    10,000..
  • 29:29 - 29:30
    constantdull: I get that a lot.
  • 29:30 - 29:33
    Herald: Are we not friends?
    100.000
  • 29:33 - 29:34
    audience laughing
  • 29:34 - 29:36
    laughs Thank you so much
    for the super-interesting talk.
  • 29:36 - 29:43
    We.. I think we time for 2 questions,
    or even 1 question from..
  • 29:43 - 29:46
    constantdull: Oh, but there's a big..
    there's a big no on that.
  • 29:46 - 29:47
    constantdull: I'm..
    Herald: No.
  • 29:47 - 29:48
    No.
  • 29:48 - 29:51
    So.. yeah, actually..
    if there's any questions then I think
  • 29:51 - 29:55
    we can do that outside of the talk right now.
  • 29:55 - 29:56
    Thank you very much!
  • 29:56 - 29:58
    constantdull: Thank you!
    applause
  • 29:58 - 30:02
    postroll music
  • 30:02 - 30:09
    subtitles created by c3subtitles.de
    Join, and help us!
Title:
constantdull: the possibility of an army
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Duration:
30:09

English subtitles

Revisions