-
What does cage-free mean?
-
The term may bring to mind happy chickens roaming free in a rolling
green field, their lush feathers glistening in the ample sunlight.
-
Well, here comes a vegan to rain on your chicken paradise parade...
-
(It's me...I'm the vegan...)
-
(music, bird song, animal noises and the soft buzzing of bees)
-
Hi, it's Emily from BiteSizeVegan.org, where you can
find free resources, eCourses, kids' content,
-
and a Guided Search to help you find just what
you need, even if you don't know what to ask!
-
Speaking of eCourses, this video has one of its very own,
so you can test your knowledge after watching!
-
For those of you watching this on BiteSizeVegan.org
—first of all, you're awesome
-
—just click the "take the eCourse now" button.
-
For those of you watching elsewhere, just head over to
BiteSizeVegan.org/CageFree
-
where you will also find all of the sources for this video
-
(and there are a lot... Cause I'm a nerd)
-
Before diving into the meaning of cage-free eggs, it's important to acknowledge
-
that the vast majority of the world's almost 8 billion
layer hens are still kept in battery cages
-
—one of the most intensive forms of confinement in the animal products industry.
-
Crammed together in these small, barren cages, each
individual hen is afforded less space than a single sheet of paper
-
—unable to extend their wings or even stand fully upright.
-
Denied the ability to engage in natural behaviors such as
foraging, wing-flapping, perching, dust bathing, and nesting,
-
hens in battery cages experience extreme distress—
-
manifesting in neurotic behavior, feather loss, aggression, and even cannibalism.
-
These hens live in constant pain,
-
often suffering from osteoporosis due to the combination of nutrient loss
from high egg production and a severe lack of movement.
-
Rising public concern over the last four decades regarding the horrific conditions
of battery cages has led to increasing demands for alternative systems.
-
Now, a total ban on battery cages sounds like a
huge move in the right direction, right?
-
Well, In 1999, The Council of the European Union set a directive
that banned all “barren battery cages” by 2012.
-
While media coverage at the time focused on the end of battery cages in the EU,
-
what the directive actually did was replace barren battery cages with
“enriched"—meaning furnished—battery cages.
-
Yes, hens would now be provided more space and given
furnishings like perches and laying nests
-
—certainly an improvement over barren cages.
-
However, while reports extolled that hens would now each be afforded 750cm²,
rather than the 550 cm² in conventional battery cages,
-
they neglected to clarify that—due to the new furnishings
—only 600cm² would be usable.
-
Meaning—in the end—that this revolutionary
step forward for the rights of laying hens
-
granted them less than a single playing card
of additional space.
-
Even more maddening: in 2012, over twelve years after the directive,
thirteen Member States had still failed to comply with the ban.
-
The 1999 Council Directive addressed more than an eventual end
to barren battery cages in favor of enriched cages
-
—it also introduced a third category, termed "alternative systems."
-
This umbrella term covered various non-cage systems, such as aviaries
and barns—including what we commonly refer to as "cage-free eggs."
-
So, what, exactly, does cage-free mean?
-
In the simplest terms, cage-free means exactly what it sounds like:
laying hens are never caged. But the simplicity ends there.
-
As the term "cage-free" primarily defines how hens are not to be housed,
the actual conditions under which cage-free hens are housed varies greatly;
-
standards are largely unspecified, unverified and unregulated.
-
In the U.S., the United Stated Department of Agriculture (USDA)
only specifies that cage-free eggs
-
"must be produced by hens housed in a building, room or enclosure
that allows for unlimited access to food and water
-
and provides the freedom to roam the area during the laying cycle."
-
Cage-free eggs graded by the USDA are subject to on-site inspections
twice a year, purely to ensure the hens are not in cages.
-
Additionally, not all cage-free eggs are graded by the USDA,
-
so many cage-free labels do not have any verification
at all that the hens they came from were not caged.
-
In the European Union, while the term "cage-free"
doesn't seem to be widely used,
-
non-cage systems are required to "not exceed
9 laying hens per m² usable area."
-
This affords each hen a little over a square foot of space.
-
There are no such stocking density limits in the United States, among other countries.
-
The separation between cage and non-cage farming is often completely non-existent:
-
many egg producers have both caged and cage-free facilities on the same property.
-
Purchasing cage-free eggs is in no way supporting smaller, independent farmers.
-
That said, there is no denying that almost anything would be
an improvement over life in a battery cage.
-
However, as we've learned with "enriched" cages, alternative systems
aren't the idyllic environments we may envision.
-
Cage-free hens are kept indoors, usually in windowless buildings.
Each structure may contain thousands to tens of thousands of birds.
-
This extreme overcrowding leaves some cage-free hens without much more room than battery cages, resulting in many of the same mental and physical consequences.
-
Additionally, cage-free hens are not spared the cruel
"standard practices" of the egg industry as a whole.
-
All hens are sourced from hatcheries where male chicks are killed upon hatching.
-
The primary method recommended by the European Union's humane
regulations, and implemented worldwide, is "maceration"
-
—a euphemistic term for dropping newborn male chicks
into a meat grinder while alive.
-
It's estimated that 3.2 billion male chicks are killed every year.
-
Cage-free hens are still subjected to debeaking —a painful mutilation
in which a portion of their sensitive beaks are cut or burned off.
-
In the few countries where debeaking is banned, hens face increased mortality rates from aggressive pecking brought on by crowded and stressful living conditions.
-
The living beings within all animal product industries
are viewed as just that—products.
-
Laying hens are no different—everything from their environment to their
very genetics are engineered for maximum egg output.
-
Artificial lighting is used to constantly manipulate hens'
hormones in order to increase their egg production.
-
One of the most cruel practices within the
egg industry is what's referred to as "induced molting."
-
Farmers remove the hens’ food for weeks, literally starving them.
-
The hens lose up to 35% of their body weight, along
with their feathers, allowing their reproductive tracts to “refresh”
-
so they can pump out another round of eggs.
-
They are also subjected to more extreme forms of light manipulation,
at times enduring a week of constant light.
-
There is nothing within the cage-free label that prohibits this barbaric practice.
-
While forced molting is banned in some countries,
this simply means the hens are slaughtered after they are no longer profitable
-
—a fate which awaits every layer hen.
-
No matter the label, housing conditions or country, all
layer hens are killed when their egg production declines
-
—typically when they are 70-80 weeks old. No longer able to turn a profit,
they are sent to their deaths—still mere babies themselves.
-
In caged systems, hens can be more effectively separated from their waste.
-
In cage-free systems, the ammonia from their waste can cause
dangerous conditions for the hens, workers, and the public.
-
A study looking into the sources of particulate pollution found the
poultry industry to be the greatest single contributor.
-
The ammonia in poultry litter "combines with other pollutants—
sulfur dioxide and nitrous oxide...to produce a secondary source of
additional deadly [fine particulate matter]."
-
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has estimated that this
kind of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5)
-
"is responsible for over 90% of air pollution-related health damages."
-
A large-scale study by the Coalition for Sustainable Egg Supply
(CSES) research project
-
found the mortality rate (meaning death rate) in non-cage
systems to be 2.5 times higher than in battery cage systems.
-
This finding was far from isolated to one study or country.
-
The primary causes of increased mortality in non-cage systems include:
injurious pecking, cannibalism, and disease transference.
-
These very issues are a large part of why battery cages were invented in the first place
-
—confining hens in cages makes it much easier to manage behavioral
issues and disease outbreaks.
-
Pointing to the housing system as the reason for more deaths, is an
oversimplification of what is a very complex issue.
-
A meta-analysis of data from 29 sources covering commercial farms in 16 countries
-
indicates a possible decline in mortality rates within
non-cage systems in more recent years.
-
The authors argue that this decline will continue as producers become
more familiar with managing non-cage systems,
-
and as more "appropriate" hen breeds are created and utilized.
-
They also emphasize are created and utilized. the importance of debeaking
hens to reduce injurious and cannibalistic behavior.
-
At first glance, this decline in mortality rates in non-cage systems
may sound like a promising trend.
-
Yet, rather than pointing to reasons for hope, the proposed causes of the decline actually highlight a stark reality:
-
within the animal products industries, the solutions are the problems.
-
When hens injure and kill one another due to their breeding and living conditions
-
—both of which have been imposed upon them—
-
the solution is to cut off their beaks and alter their breeding.
-
Ian J.H. Duncan, Professor Emeritus and Emeritus Chair in Animal Welfare at the University of Guelph, Canada, illustrates this predicament, saying:
-
"If [producers] do not trim beaks, then feather
pecking and cannibalism may cause enormous suffering.
-
If they do trim beaks by conventional methods,
the birds will suffer from acute and chronic pain...
-
Chopping off parts of young animals in order to prevent future
welfare problems is a very crude solution."
-
Duncan proposes instead that, given
"feather pecking has hereditary characteristics....
-
It therefore seems likely that the long-term
solution to this problem will be a genetic one..."
-
While certainly less objectionable than debeaking on a visceral level,
-
genetic manipulation of sentient beings to serve our purposes is not only extremely ethically problematic, but
—once again—what got us into this position in the first place.
-
The animal products industries have honed these beings at a
genetic level to meet specific demands and performance.
-
Laying hens have traditionally been bred for producing
as many eggs as possible in a caged environment.
-
Place them into a cage-free environment and mortality skyrockets.
-
So, the solution to the problems inadvertently created by genetic
manipulation is to further manipulate their genes.
-
Every time our breeding, confinement, mutilation and slaughter of non-human
animals invariably cause ethical, environmental and health problems,
-
we strive to solve them with different variations of breeding,
confinement, mutilation and slaughter.
-
We continue this cycle over and over again—addressing problems
of our own creation with solutions that will eventually become our next problem
-
—rather than stepping back and questioning our use of animals in the first place.
-
Even if less hens die in one housing system
than another, is that truly any indicator of their quality of life?
-
As the authors of the meta analysis themselves poignantly state:
-
"Put simply, what makes animals suffer is not necessarily what kills them."
-
There are mountains of research and governmental regulations
you can read through regarding the welfare of laying hens around the world.
-
What I've covered just touches the surface.
-
But in the end, while I believe it's vital to know the truth behind humane
claims, it's our use of animals in and of itself that's inhumane.
-
No matter what label we give it.
-
I hope this video has been helpful.
Don't forget to take the free eCourse to test your knowledge!
-
To stay in the loop about new Bite Size Vegan content
and updates, subscribe to the newsletter or
-
follow the Telegram channel for the most reliable notifications.
-
Now go live vegan, and I'll see you soon.