-
Intelligence: what is it?
-
If we take a look back at the history
-
of how intelligence has been viewed,
-
one seminal example has been
-
Edsger Dijkstra's famous quote that
-
"the question of whether a machine can think
-
is about as interesting
-
as the question of whether a submarine
-
can swim."
-
Now, Edsger Dijkstra, when he wrote this,
-
intended it as a criticism
-
of the early pioneers of computer science,
-
like Alan Turing.
-
However, if you take a look back
-
and think about what have been
-
the most empowering innovations
-
that enabled us to build
-
artificial machines that swim
-
and artificial machines that think,
-
you find that it was only through understanding
-
the underlying physical mechanisms
-
of swimming and flight
-
that we were able to build these machines.
-
And so, several years ago,
-
I undertook a program to try to understand
-
the fundamental physical mechanisms
-
underlying intelligence.
-
Let's take a step back.
-
Let's first begin with a thought experiment.
-
Pretend that you're an alien race
-
that doesn't know anything about earth biology
-
or earth neuroscience or earth intelligence,
-
but you have amazing telescopes
-
and you're able to watch the earth,
-
and you have amazingly long lives,
-
so you're able to watch the earth
-
over millions, even billions of years.
-
And you observe a really strange effect.
-
You observe that, over the course of the millennia,
-
Earth is continually bombarded with asteroids
-
up until a point,
-
and that at some point,
-
corresponding roughly to our year, 2000 AD,
-
asteroids that are on
-
a collision course with the Earth
-
that otherwise would have collided
-
mysteriously get deflected
-
or they detonate before they can hit the Earth.
-
Now of course, as earthlings,
-
we know the reason would be
-
that we're trying to save ourselves.
-
We're trying to prevent an impact.
-
But if you're an alien race
-
who doesn't know any of this,
-
doesn't have any concept of Earth intelligence,
-
you'd be forced to put together
-
a physical theory that explains how,
-
up until a certain point in time,
-
asteroids that would demolish the surface of a planet
-
mysteriously stop doing that.
-
And so I claim that this is the same question
-
as understanding the physical nature of intelligence.
-
So in this program that I
undertook several years ago,
-
I looked at a variety of different threads
-
across science, across a variety of disciplines,
-
that were pointing, I think,
-
towards a single, underlying mechanism
-
for intelligence.
-
In cosmology, for example,
-
there have been a variety of
different threads of evidence
-
that our universe appears to be finely tuned
-
for the development of intelligence,
-
and, in particular, for the development
-
of universal states
-
that maximize the diversity of possible futures.
-
In game play, for example, in Go,
-
everyone remembers in 1997
-
when IBM's Deep Blue beat Gary Kasparov at chess.
-
Fewer people are aware
-
that in the past 10 years or so,
-
the game of Go,
-
arguably a much more challenging game
-
because it has a much higher branching factor,
-
has also started to succumb
-
to computer game players
-
for the same reason:
-
the best techniques right now
-
for computers playing Go
-
are techniques that try to maximize future options
-
during game play.
-
Finally, in robotic motion planning,
-
there have been a variety of recent techniques
-
that have tried to take advantage
-
of abilities of robots to maximize
-
future freedom of action
-
in order to accomplish complex tasks.
-
And so, taking all of these different threads
-
and putting them together,
-
I asked, starting several years ago,
-
is there an underlying mechanism for intelligence
-
that we can factor out
-
of all of these different threads?
-
Is there a single equation for intelligence?
-
And the answer, I believe, is yes.
-
What you're seeing is probably
-
the closest equivalent to an E=MC squared
-
for intelligence that I've seen.
-
So what you're seeing here
-
is a statement of correspondence
-
that intelligence is a force, F,
-
that acts so as to maximize future freedom of action.
-
It acts to maximize future freedom of action,
-
or keep options open,
-
with some strength T,
-
with the diversity of possible accessible futures, S,
-
up to some future time horizon, Tau.
-
In short, intelligence doesn't like to get trapped.
-
Intelligence tries to maximize
future freedom of action
-
and keep options open.
-
And so, given this one equation,
-
it's natural to ask, so what can you do with this?
-
How predictive is it?
-
Does it predict human-level intelligence?
-
Does it predict artificial intelligence?
-
So I'm going to show you now a video
-
that will, I think, demonstrate
-
some of the amazing applications
-
of just this single equation.
-
(Video) Voice: Recent research in cosmology
-
has suggested that universes that produce
-
more disorder, or "entropy," over their lifetimes
-
should tend to have more favorable conditions
-
for the existence of intelligent
beings such as ourselves.
-
But what if that tentative cosmological connection
-
between entropy and intelligence
-
hints at a deeper relationship?
-
What if intelligence behavior doesn't just correlate
-
with the production of long-term entropy,
-
but actually emerges directly from it?
-
To find out, we developed a software engine
-
called ENTROPICA, designed to maximize
-
the production of long-term entropy
-
of any system that it finds itself in.
-
Amazingly, ENTROPICA was able to pass
-
multiple animal intelligence
tests, play human games,
-
and even earn money trading stocks,
-
all without being instructed to do so.
-
Here are some examples of ENTROPICA in action.
-
Just like a human standing
upright without falling over,
-
here we see ENTROPICA
-
automatically balancing a pole using a cart.
-
This behavior is remarkable in part
-
because we never gave ENTROPICA a goal.
-
It simply decided on its own to balance the pole.
-
This balancing ability will have appliactions
-
for humanoid robotics
-
and human assistive technologies.
-
Just as some animals can use objects
-
and their environments as tools
-
to reach into narrow spaces,
-
here we see that ENTROPICA,
-
again on its own initiative,
-
was able to move a large
disk representing an animal
-
around so as to cause a small disk,
-
representing a tool, to reach into a confined space
-
holding a third disk
-
and release the third disk
from its initially fixed position.
-
This tool use ability will have applications
-
for smart manufacturing and agriculture.
-
In addition, just as some other animals
-
are able to cooperate by pulling
opposite ends of a rope
-
at the same time to release food,
-
here we see that ENTROPICA is able to accomplish
-
a model version of that task.
-
This cooperative ability has interesting implications
-
for economic planning and a variety of other fields.
-
ENTROPICA is broadly applicable
-
to a variety of domains.
-
For example, here we see it successfully
-
playing a game of pong against itself,
-
illustrating its potential for gaming.
-
Here we see ENTROPICA orchestrating
-
new connections on a social network
-
where friends are constantly falling out of touch
-
and successfully keeping
the network well-connected.
-
This same network orchestration ability
-
also has applications in health care,
-
energy, and intelligence.
-
Here we see ENTROPICA directing the paths
-
of a fleet of ships,
-
successfully discovering and
utilizing the Panama Canal
-
to globally extend its reach from the Atlantic
-
to the Pacific.
-
By the same token, ENTROPICA
-
is broadly applicable to problems
-
in autonomous defense, logistics, and transportation.
-
Finally, here we see ENTROPICA
-
spontaneously discovering and executing
-
a buy-low, sell-high strategy
-
on a simulated range-traded stock,
-
successfully growing assets under management
-
exponentially.
-
This risk management ability
-
will have broad applications in finance
-
and insurance.
-
Alex Wissner-Gross: So what you've just seen
-
is that a variety of signature human intelligent
-
cognitive behaviors
-
such as tool use and walking upright
-
and social cooperation
-
all follow from a single equation
-
which drives a system
-
to maximize its future freedom of action.
-
Now there's a profound irony here.
-
Going back to the the beginning
-
of the usage of the term robot,
-
the play R.U.R.,
-
there was always a concept
-
that if we developed machine intelligence,
-
there would be a cybernetic revolt.
-
The machines would rise up against us.
-
One major consequence of this work
-
is that maybe all of these decades,
-
we've had the whole concept of cybernetic revolt
-
in reverse.
-
It's not that machines first become intelligent
-
and then megalomaniacal
-
and try to take over the world.
-
It's quite the opposite,
-
that the urge to take control
-
of all possible futures
-
is a more fundamental principle
-
than that of intelligence,
-
that general intelligence may in fact emerge
-
directly from this sort of control-grabbing,
-
rather than vice versa.
-
Another important consequence is goal-seeking.
-
I'm often asked, how does the ability to seek goals
-
follow from this sort of framework?
-
And the answer is, the ability to seek goals
-
will follow directly from this
-
in the following sense:
-
just like you would travel through a tunnel,
-
a bottleneck in your future path space,
-
in order to achieve many other
-
diverse objectives later on,
-
or just like you would invest
-
in a financial security,
-
reducing your short-term liquidity
-
in order to increase your wealth over the long term,
-
goal-seeking emerges directly
-
from a long-term drive
-
to increase future freedom of action.
-
Finally, Richard Feynman, famous physicist,
-
once wrote that if human civilization were destroyed
-
and you could pass only a single concept
-
on to our descendants
-
to help them rebuild civilization,
-
that concept should be
-
that all matter around us
-
is made out of tiny elements
-
that attract each other when they're far apart
-
but repel each other when they're close together.
-
My equivalent of that statement
-
to pass on to descendants
-
to help them build artificial intelligences
-
or to help them understand human intelligence,
-
is the following:
-
intelligence should be viewed
-
as a physical process
-
that tries to maximize future freedom of action
-
and avoid constraints in its own future.
-
Thank you very much.
-
(Applause)