Critical Thinking Fallacy: Affirming The Consequent
- Title:
- Critical Thinking Fallacy: Affirming The Consequent
- Description:
-
more » « less
In this video, Matthew C. Harris (Duke University) explains the fallacy of affirming the consequent, the formal fallacy that arises from inferring the converse of an argument. He also explains why you sometimes cannot conclude that you should bathe in a tub of peanut butter.
- Video Language:
- English
- Duration:
- 03:28
![]() |
Emika edited Ukrainian subtitles for Critical Thinking Fallacy: Affirming The Consequent | |
![]() |
Julia edited Ukrainian subtitles for Critical Thinking Fallacy: Affirming The Consequent | |
![]() |
Emika edited Ukrainian subtitles for Critical Thinking Fallacy: Affirming The Consequent | |
![]() |
Emika edited Ukrainian subtitles for Critical Thinking Fallacy: Affirming The Consequent | |
![]() |
Emika edited Ukrainian subtitles for Critical Thinking Fallacy: Affirming The Consequent | |
![]() |
Оксана Кузьменко edited Ukrainian subtitles for Critical Thinking Fallacy: Affirming The Consequent | |
![]() |
Chan-Woo Lee edited Korean subtitles for Critical Thinking Fallacy: Affirming The Consequent | |
![]() |
David Fajardo Chica edited Spanish subtitles for Critical Thinking Fallacy: Affirming The Consequent |