-
Forget about "good as gold".
Today it's going to get evil.
-
But who or what is evil at all?
-
The devil?
-
The Illuminati?
-
The mother in law?
-
Usually evil stands for morally wrong decisions,
-
an basic power which influences
the history of the world
-
and which is the opponent of good.
-
That means, where light is, is also a shadow.
-
Obviously! God against the devil,
the West against the terrorists,
-
Aspirin against headache ...
-
however back to the individual human being.
-
But who defines “morally wrong”?
-
Depending on the ethic position there are
significant differences within the definition.
-
According to the critic of the Bible
Benedict de Spinoza, evil is all
-
That blocks the self-assertion
of every individual.
-
So, it´s a force from outside,
-
that prevents us humans
from developing freely.
-
For Kant, evil is an essential
part of human nature,
-
since humans are not only
equipped with reason,
-
but also with "empirical",
entirely worldly needs.
-
The inclination to the "dark side"-
-
so it has always been in us?
-
His fellow Enlightenment thinker
Rousseau sees things differently.
-
For him, humans are born good.
-
Only living in the community (is what)
poisons us, makes us evil.
-
Are we born evil,
or does society make us evil?
-
Nietzsche threw all of this overboard,
-
declared "good" to be "bad"
-
and "evil" simply to be
a construct of Christian "slave morality.”
-
Leibniz thoroughly examined the evil
-
He separated it into three categories
-
That’s the malem physicum:
-
Pain, loss, loneliness, poverty
-
everything that you wouldn’t even wish your worst enemy
-
Then Leibniz described the malum metaphysicum:
-
Small imperfections, predetermined breaking points built in by divine hand
-
According to Leibniz, man himself can be evil in only one way -
-
through the malum morale, the moral evil.
-
The sin which you commit when you turn from God.
-
In the 20th century, the existential philosopher Karl Jaspers also separated
-
evil within man into three categories
-
Firstly: Urges of any kind
-
Secondly: The lack of will to do good
-
And thirdly: The will to do evil
-
That is indeed interesting!
-
Haven’t we always been more fascinated
by Darth Vader
-
than by Luke Skywalker
wrapped in boring Eco-linen
-
It doesn’t matter which point of view you have;
be it religious or ideological -
-
- "pure" evil; killing, stealing, lying
-
Is what is bad for
The individual and society
-
Yet it seems
that we need evil.
-
Good and evil are
in a dualistic relationship
-
One cannot exist without the other
-
Otherwise, Ozzy Osborne
would just be a doddering father
-
and every Hollywood film would begin
with the happy ending
-
And plod along without antagonists
-
We need evil as an antithesis.
-
To find our way in the
ethnical world
-
Not Synced