-
Not Synced
So whenever I visit a school
and talk to students,
-
Not Synced
I always ask them the same thing:
-
Not Synced
Why do you google?
-
Not Synced
Why is Google the search engine
of choice for you?
-
Not Synced
Strangely enough, I always get
the same three answers.
-
Not Synced
One, "Because it works",
-
Not Synced
which is a great answer,
that's why I google, too.
-
Not Synced
Two, somebody will say,
-
Not Synced
"I really don't know of any alternatives."
-
Not Synced
It's not an equally great answer
-
Not Synced
and my reply to that is usually,
"Try to google the word 'search engine',
-
Not Synced
you may find a couple
of interesting alternatives."
-
Not Synced
And last but not least, thirdly,
-
Not Synced
inevitably, one student will raise
her or his hand and say,
-
Not Synced
"With Google, I'm certain to always get
the best, unbiased search result."
-
Not Synced
Certain to always get
the best, unbiased search result.
-
Not Synced
Now, as a man of the humanities,
-
Not Synced
albeit, the digital humanities man,
-
Not Synced
that just makes my skin curl,
-
Not Synced
even if I, too, realize that that trust,
that idea of the unbiased search result
-
Not Synced
is a cornerstone in our collective
love for and appreciation of Google.
-
Not Synced
I will show you why that, philosophically,
is almost an impossibility.
-
Not Synced
But let me first elaborate
on a basic principle
-
Not Synced
behind the search query
that we sometimes seem to forget.
-
Not Synced
So whenever you set out
to Google something,
-
Not Synced
start by asking yourself this,
"Am I looking for an isolated fact?:
-
Not Synced
What is the capital of France?
-
Not Synced
What are the building blocks
of a water molecule?"
-
Not Synced
Great -- google away.
-
Not Synced
There's not a group of scientists
who are this close
-
Not Synced
to proving that it's actually London
or H30,
-
Not Synced
you don't see a big conspiracy
among those things.
-
Not Synced
We agree, on a global scale,
what the answers are
-
Not Synced
to these isolated facts.
-
Not Synced
But if you complicate your question
just a little bit and ask something like,
-
Not Synced
"Why is there
an Israeli-Palestine conflict?"
-
Not Synced
You're not exactly looking
for a singular fact anymore,
-
Not Synced
you're looking for knowledge,
-
Not Synced
which is something way more
complicated and delicate.
-
Not Synced
And to get to knowledge,
-
Not Synced
you have to bring 10 or 20
or 100 facts to the table
-
Not Synced
and acknowledge them and say,
"Yes, these are all true."
-
Not Synced
But because of who I am,
-
Not Synced
young or old, black or white,
gay or straight,
-
Not Synced
I will value them differently.
-
Not Synced
And I will value them differently
and I will say,
-
Not Synced
"Yes, this is true, but this is more
important to me than that."
-
Not Synced
And this is where it becomes interesting
because this is where we become human.
-
Not Synced
This is when we start to argue,
to form society
-
Not Synced
and to really get somewhere.
-
Not Synced
We need to filter all our facts here
-
Not Synced
through friends and neighbors
and parents and children
-
Not Synced
and coworkers and newspapers
and magazines
-
Not Synced
to finally be grounded in real knowledge,
-
Not Synced
which is something that a search engine
is a poor help to achieve.
-
Not Synced
So I promised you an example
Just to show you why it's so hard
-
Not Synced
to get to the point of true, clean,
objective knowledge --
-
Not Synced
that's food for thought.
-
Not Synced
I will conduct a couple of simple queries,
search queries.
-
Not Synced
We'll start with "Michelle Obama",
the First Lady of the United States.
-
Not Synced
And we'll click for pictures,
it works really well, as you can see.
-
Not Synced
It's a perfect search result,
more or less,
-
Not Synced
it's just her in the picture,
not even the President.
-
Not Synced
How does this work?
-
Not Synced
Quite simple,
-
Not Synced
Google uses a lot of smartness
to achieve this,
-
Not Synced
but quite simply, they look at two things
more than anything.
-
Not Synced
First, what does under the picture
on each website.
-
Not Synced
Does it say "Michelle Obama"
under the picture?
-
Not Synced
Pretty good indication
it's actually her on there.
-
Not Synced
Second, Google looks at the picture file,
-
Not Synced
the name of the file as such
uploaded to the website.
-
Not Synced
Again, is it called "Michelle Obama.jpeg"?
-
Not Synced
Pretty good indication it's not
Clint Eastwood in the picture.
-
Not Synced
So you got those two and you get
a search result like this, almost.
-
Not Synced
Now, in 2009, Michelle Obama
was the victim of a racist campaign
-
Not Synced
where people set out to insult her
through her search results.
-
Not Synced
There was a picture distributed widely
across the Internet
-
Not Synced
where her face was distorted
to look like a monkey.
-
Not Synced
And that picture was published all over.
-
Not Synced
And people published it
very, very purposefully
-
Not Synced
to get it up there in the search results.
-
Not Synced
They made sure to write "Michelle Obama"
in the caption
-
Not Synced
and they made sure to upload the picture
as "Michelle Obama.jpeg" or the like.
-
Not Synced
You get why, to manipulate
the search result.
-
Not Synced
And it worked, too.
-
Not Synced
So when you picture-Googled
"Michelle Obama" in 2009,
-
Not Synced
that distorted money picture
showed up among the first results.
-
Not Synced
Now, the results are self-cleansing,
-
Not Synced
and that's sort of the beauty of it
-
Not Synced
because Google measures relevance
every hour every day.
-
Not Synced
However, Google didn't settle
for that this time,
-
Not Synced
they just thought, "That's racist
and it's a bad search result
-
Not Synced
and we're going to go back
and clean that up manually.
-
Not Synced
We are going to write some code
and fix it",
-
Not Synced
which they did,
-
Not Synced
and I don't think anyone in this room
thinks that was a bad idea.
-
Not Synced
But then, a couple years go by,
-
Not Synced
and the world's most googled Anders,
-
Not Synced
Anders Behring Breivik,
-
Not Synced
did what he did.
-
Not Synced
This is July 22 in 2011
and a terrible day in recent history.
-
Not Synced
This man, a terrorist, blew up
a couple of government buildings,
-
Not Synced
walking distance from where we are
right now in Oslo, Norway
-
Not Synced
and then he traveled to the the