Return to Video

TEDxMIA - Scott Rickard - The beautiful math behind the ugliest music

  • 0:11 - 0:14
    So what makes a piece of music beautiful?
  • 0:14 - 0:16
    Well, most musicologists would argue
  • 0:16 - 0:19
    that repetition is a key aspect of beauty.
  • 0:19 - 0:22
    The idea that we take a melody, a motif, a musical idea,
  • 0:22 - 0:25
    we repeat it, we set up the expectation for repetition,
  • 0:25 - 0:28
    and then we either realize it or we break the repetition.
  • 0:28 - 0:30
    And that's a key component of beauty.
  • 0:30 - 0:33
    So if repetition and patterns are key to beauty,
  • 0:33 - 0:36
    then what would the absence of patterns sound like
  • 0:36 - 0:37
    if we wrote a piece of music
  • 0:37 - 0:41
    that had no repetition whatsoever in it?
  • 0:41 - 0:43
    That's actually an interesting mathematical question.
  • 0:43 - 0:47
    Is it possible to write a piece of music that has no repetition whatsoever?
  • 0:47 - 0:49
    It's not random. Random is easy.
  • 0:49 - 0:52
    Repetition-free, it turns out, is extremely difficult
  • 0:52 - 0:54
    and the only reason that we can actually do it
  • 0:54 - 0:57
    is because of a man who was hunting for submarines.
  • 0:57 - 0:59
    It turns out a guy who was trying to develop
  • 0:59 - 1:02
    the world's perfect sonar ping
  • 1:02 - 1:05
    solved the problem of writing pattern-free music.
  • 1:05 - 1:08
    And that's what the topic of the talk is today.
  • 1:08 - 1:13
    So, recall that in sonar,
  • 1:13 - 1:16
    you have a ship that sends out some sound in the water,
  • 1:16 - 1:18
    and it listens for it -- an echo.
  • 1:18 - 1:21
    The sound goes down, it echoes back, it goes down, echoes back.
  • 1:21 - 1:24
    The time it takes the sound to come back tells you how far away it is.
  • 1:24 - 1:27
    If it comes at a higher pitch, it's because the thing is moving toward you.
  • 1:27 - 1:30
    If it comes back at a lower pitch, it's because it's moving away from you.
  • 1:30 - 1:32
    So how would you design a perfect sonar ping?
  • 1:32 - 1:37
    Well, in the 1960s, a guy by the name of John Costas
  • 1:37 - 1:40
    was working on the Navy's extremely expensive sonar system.
  • 1:40 - 1:42
    It wasn't working,
  • 1:42 - 1:44
    and it was because the ping they were using was inappropriate.
  • 1:44 - 1:46
    It was a ping much like the following here,
  • 1:46 - 1:49
    which you can think of this as the notes
  • 1:49 - 1:51
    and this is time.
  • 1:51 - 1:53
    (Music)
  • 1:53 - 1:56
    So that was the sonar ping they were using: a down chirp.
  • 1:56 - 1:58
    It turns out that's a really bad ping.
  • 1:58 - 2:01
    Why? Because it looks like shifts of itself.
  • 2:01 - 2:03
    The relationship between the first two notes is the same
  • 2:03 - 2:06
    as the second two and so forth.
  • 2:06 - 2:08
    So he designed a different kind of sonar ping:
  • 2:08 - 2:10
    one that looks random.
  • 2:10 - 2:13
    These look like a random pattern of dots, but they're not.
  • 2:13 - 2:15
    If you look very carefully, you may notice
  • 2:15 - 2:19
    that in fact the relationship between each pair of dots is distinct.
  • 2:19 - 2:21
    Nothing is ever repeated.
  • 2:21 - 2:24
    The first two notes and every other pair of notes
  • 2:24 - 2:26
    have a different relationship.
  • 2:26 - 2:29
    So the fact that we know about these patterns is unusual.
  • 2:29 - 2:31
    John Costas is the inventor of these patterns.
  • 2:31 - 2:34
    This is a picture from 2006, shortly before his death.
  • 2:34 - 2:37
    He was the sonar engineer working for the Navy.
  • 2:37 - 2:40
    He was thinking about these patterns
  • 2:40 - 2:42
    and he was, by hand, able to come up with them to size 12 --
  • 2:42 - 2:44
    12 by 12.
  • 2:44 - 2:46
    He couldn't go any further and he thought
  • 2:46 - 2:48
    maybe they don't exist in any size bigger than 12.
  • 2:48 - 2:50
    So he wrote a letter to the mathematician in the middle,
  • 2:50 - 2:53
    who was a young mathematician in California at the time,
  • 2:53 - 2:54
    Solomon Golomb.
  • 2:54 - 2:56
    It turns out that Solomon Golomb was one of the
  • 2:56 - 2:59
    most gifted discrete mathematicians of our time.
  • 2:59 - 3:03
    John asked Solomon if he could tell him the right reference
  • 3:03 - 3:04
    to where these patterns were.
  • 3:04 - 3:05
    There was no reference.
  • 3:05 - 3:07
    Nobody had ever thought about
  • 3:07 - 3:10
    a repetition, a pattern-free structure before.
  • 3:10 - 3:13
    Solomon Golomb spent the summer thinking about the problem.
  • 3:13 - 3:16
    And he relied on the mathematics of this gentleman here,
  • 3:16 - 3:18
    Evariste Galois.
  • 3:18 - 3:20
    Now, Galois is a very famous mathematician.
  • 3:20 - 3:23
    He's famous because he invented a whole branch of mathematics,
  • 3:23 - 3:25
    which bears his name, called Galois Field Theory.
  • 3:25 - 3:29
    It's the mathematics of prime numbers.
  • 3:29 - 3:32
    He's also famous because of the way that he died.
  • 3:32 - 3:35
    So the story is that he stood up for the honor of a young woman.
  • 3:35 - 3:39
    He was challenged to a duel and he accepted.
  • 3:39 - 3:41
    And shortly before the duel occurred,
  • 3:41 - 3:43
    he wrote down all of his mathematical ideas,
  • 3:43 - 3:44
    sent letters to all of his friends,
  • 3:44 - 3:46
    saying please, please, please --
  • 3:46 - 3:47
    this is 200 years ago --
  • 3:47 - 3:48
    please, please, please
  • 3:48 - 3:51
    see that these things get published eventually.
  • 3:51 - 3:54
    He then fought the duel, was shot, and died at age 20.
  • 3:54 - 3:57
    The mathematics that runs your cell phones, the Internet,
  • 3:57 - 4:01
    that allows us to communicate, DVDs,
  • 4:01 - 4:04
    all comes from the mind of Evariste Galois,
  • 4:04 - 4:07
    a mathematician who died 20 years young.
  • 4:07 - 4:09
    When you talk about the legacy that you leave,
  • 4:09 - 4:11
    of course he couldn't have even anticipated the way
  • 4:11 - 4:12
    that his mathematics would be used.
  • 4:12 - 4:14
    Thankfully, his mathematics was eventually published.
  • 4:14 - 4:17
    Solomon Golomb realized that that mathematics was
  • 4:17 - 4:20
    exactly the mathematics needed to solve the problem
  • 4:20 - 4:23
    of creating a pattern-free structure.
  • 4:23 - 4:26
    So he sent a letter back to John saying it turns out you can
  • 4:26 - 4:28
    generate these patterns using prime number theory.
  • 4:28 - 4:34
    And John went about and solved the sonar problem for the Navy.
  • 4:34 - 4:37
    So what do these patterns look like again?
  • 4:37 - 4:39
    Here's a pattern here.
  • 4:39 - 4:43
    This is an 88 by 88 sized Costas array.
  • 4:43 - 4:45
    It's generated in a very simple way.
  • 4:45 - 4:49
    Elementary school mathematics is sufficient to solve this problem.
  • 4:49 - 4:53
    It's generated by repeatedly multiplying by the number 3.
  • 4:53 - 4:58
    1, 3, 9, 27, 81, 243 ...
  • 4:58 - 5:01
    When I get to a bigger [number] that's larger than 89
  • 5:01 - 5:02
    which happens to be prime,
  • 5:02 - 5:05
    I keep taking 89s away until I get back below.
  • 5:05 - 5:08
    And this will eventually fill the entire grid, 88 by 88.
  • 5:08 - 5:12
    And there happen to be 88 notes on the piano.
  • 5:12 - 5:15
    So today, we are going to have the world premiere
  • 5:15 - 5:20
    of the world's first pattern-free piano sonata.
  • 5:20 - 5:23
    So, back to the question of music.
  • 5:23 - 5:24
    What makes music beautiful?
  • 5:24 - 5:26
    Let's think about one of the most beautiful pieces ever written,
  • 5:26 - 5:28
    Beethoven's Fifth Symphony.
  • 5:28 - 5:32
    And the famous "da na na na" motif.
  • 5:32 - 5:34
    That motif occurs hundreds of times in the symphony --
  • 5:34 - 5:37
    hundreds of times in the first movement alone,
  • 5:37 - 5:39
    and also in all the other movements as well.
  • 5:39 - 5:41
    So this repetition, the setting up of this repetition
  • 5:41 - 5:43
    is so important for beauty.
  • 5:43 - 5:48
    If we think about random music as being just random notes here,
  • 5:48 - 5:51
    and over here is somehow Beethoven's Fifth in some kind of pattern,
  • 5:51 - 5:53
    if we wrote completely pattern-free music,
  • 5:53 - 5:54
    it would be way out on the tail.
  • 5:54 - 5:56
    In fact, the end of the tail of music
  • 5:56 - 5:58
    would be these pattern-free structures.
  • 5:58 - 6:02
    This music that we saw before, those stars on the grid,
  • 6:02 - 6:05
    is far, far, far from random.
  • 6:05 - 6:07
    It's perfectly pattern-free.
  • 6:07 - 6:11
    It turns out that musicologists --
  • 6:11 - 6:13
    a famous composer by the name of Arnold Schoenberg --
  • 6:13 - 6:17
    thought of this in the 1930s, '40s and '50s.
  • 6:17 - 6:20
    His goal as a composer was to write music that would
  • 6:20 - 6:22
    free music from total structure.
  • 6:22 - 6:25
    He called it the emancipation of the dissonance.
  • 6:25 - 6:27
    He created these structures called tone rows.
  • 6:27 - 6:28
    This is a tone row there.
  • 6:28 - 6:30
    It sounds a lot like a Costas array.
  • 6:30 - 6:34
    Unfortunately, he died 10 years before Costas solved the problem of
  • 6:34 - 6:37
    how you can mathematically create these structures.
  • 6:37 - 6:42
    Today, we're going to hear the world premiere of the perfect ping.
  • 6:42 - 6:46
    This is an 88 by 88 sized Costas array,
  • 6:46 - 6:48
    mapped to notes on the piano,
  • 6:48 - 6:52
    played using a structure called a Golomb ruler for the rhythm,
  • 6:52 - 6:54
    which means the starting time of each pair of notes
  • 6:54 - 6:56
    is distinct as well.
  • 6:56 - 6:59
    This is mathematically almost impossible.
  • 6:59 - 7:01
    Actually, computationally, it would be impossible to create.
  • 7:01 - 7:04
    Because of the mathematics that was developed 200 years ago --
  • 7:04 - 7:07
    through another mathematician recently and an engineer --
  • 7:07 - 7:10
    we are able to actually compose this, or construct this,
  • 7:10 - 7:13
    using multiplication by the number 3.
  • 7:13 - 7:15
    The point when you hear this music
  • 7:15 - 7:18
    is not that it's supposed to be beautiful.
  • 7:18 - 7:22
    This is supposed to be the world's ugliest piece of music.
  • 7:22 - 7:26
    In fact, it's music that only a mathematician could write.
  • 7:26 - 7:29
    When you're listening to this piece of music, I implore you:
  • 7:29 - 7:31
    Try and find some repetition.
  • 7:31 - 7:34
    Try and find something that you enjoy,
  • 7:34 - 7:37
    and then revel in the fact that you won't find it.
  • 7:37 - 7:38
    Okay?
  • 7:38 - 7:41
    So without further ado, Michael Linville,
  • 7:41 - 7:44
    the director of chamber music at the New World Symphony,
  • 7:44 - 7:48
    will perform the world premiere of the perfect ping.
  • 7:49 - 7:57
    (Music)
  • 9:35 - 9:37
    Thank you.
  • 9:37 - 9:42
    (Applause)
Title:
TEDxMIA - Scott Rickard - The beautiful math behind the ugliest music
Description:

Scott Rickard set out to engineer the ugliest possible piece of music, devoid of repetition, using a mathematical concept known as the Golomb ruler. In this talk, he shares the math behind musical beauty (and its opposite).

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Team:
closed TED
Project:
TEDxTalks
Duration:
09:46

English subtitles

Revisions