Can you outsmart the fallacy that started a witch hunt? - Elizabeth Cox
-
0:11 - 0:13Ah, a witch hunt.
-
0:13 - 0:16Humans are tireless
in their pursuit of reason. -
0:16 - 0:18"It’s 1950.
-
0:18 - 0:23Following threats from the communist
governments of the Soviet Union and China, -
0:23 - 0:28anti-communist sentiment in
the United States is at an all-time high. -
0:28 - 0:34Senator Joseph McCarthy claims
he has a list of 205 communists in the US -
0:34 - 0:37who are influencing government policy."
-
0:38 - 0:41Didn’t I just change the channel?
-
0:41 - 0:45Ah, I see. It’s a different witch hunt.
-
0:45 - 0:48"The senate forms a committee
to investigate McCarthy’s claims. -
0:48 - 0:51McCarthy names his first case:
-
0:51 - 0:56against prominent lawyer, judge,
and activist Dorothy Kenyon. -
0:56 - 1:01He accuses her of membership to 28
organizations that are communist fronts. -
1:01 - 1:04Newspapers around the country
rush to her defense, -
1:04 - 1:07pointing out her vocally
anti-communist record. -
1:07 - 1:10The senate committee schedules
a hearing anyway, -
1:10 - 1:14and she has just five days to prepare."
-
1:14 - 1:16This is too much.
-
1:16 - 1:20If the government won’t be
a voice of reason, I’ll have to. -
1:30 - 1:32That’s better.
-
1:32 - 1:37I’m surprised you good legislators
have agreed to move this hearing forward. -
1:37 - 1:40You’re falling prey to a type
of argument from ignorance: -
1:40 - 1:44assuming that a claim is true
because it hasn’t been proven false. -
1:44 - 1:49The claim being Senator McCarthy’s
accusations against Judge Kenyon, -
1:49 - 1:53for which he provided
no legitimate evidence. -
1:53 - 1:56Is that right? I thought so.
-
1:56 - 2:01Some of the so-called communist
organizations he accused her of joining -
2:01 - 2:03don’t even exist.
-
2:03 - 2:08To assume a claim is true
because it hasn’t been proven false -
2:08 - 2:10ignores many other possibilities:
-
2:10 - 2:15that it hasn’t been proven false yet,
that it can’t be proven true or false, -
2:15 - 2:19or that it isn’t completely true
or completely false, to name a few. -
2:19 - 2:22This leads to a handy rule of thumb:
-
2:22 - 2:26the burden of proof lies with the person
making the claim. -
2:26 - 2:30In other words, you make the claim,
you supply the proof. -
2:30 - 2:33If someone told you aliens exist,
-
2:33 - 2:37would you head off to find proof
that they don’t exist? -
2:37 - 2:38Of course not.
-
2:38 - 2:42You’d tell that person
to show you the UFO. -
2:42 - 2:45The same applies when someone
makes a claim -
2:45 - 2:48that contradicts an established consensus.
-
2:48 - 2:50So when all the available evidence
suggests -
2:50 - 2:54that humans are causing an increase
in global temperatures, -
2:54 - 2:57the burden of proof has been fulfilled—
-
2:57 - 3:03if you disagree, it becomes
your responsibility to prove otherwise. -
3:03 - 3:04Right?
-
3:06 - 3:09Ah, I’ve gotten ahead of myself.
-
3:09 - 3:11You’ll see what I mean soon enough.
-
3:11 - 3:16Anyway, your legal system
supposedly recognizes this rule— -
3:16 - 3:18so what are you all doing here?
-
3:25 - 3:28"It’s July 17th, 1950,
-
3:28 - 3:33and the senate subcommittee has officially
dismissed all charges against Kenyon." -
3:33 - 3:35As they should!
-
3:35 - 3:40"It’s 1954, and the senate
has formally disciplined McCarthy." -
3:40 - 3:42Took them long enough!
-
3:42 - 3:44"He will serve out the rest of his term,
-
3:44 - 3:47but will never again be elected
to a public office. -
3:47 - 3:50Because of his widespread
anti-communist influence, -
3:50 - 3:55hundreds of people have been incarcerated,
and thousands have lost their jobs." -
4:00 - 4:03Ah! Look what the communists did!
- Title:
- Can you outsmart the fallacy that started a witch hunt? - Elizabeth Cox
- Speaker:
- Elizabeth Cox
- Description:
-
View full lesson: https://ed.ted.com/lessons/can-you-outsmart-the-fallacy-that-started-a-witch-hunt-elizabeth-cox
It's 1950. Anti-communist sentiment in the United States is at an all-time high. Senator Joseph McCarthy claims he has a list of communists who are influencing government policy. He makes his first accusation without providing any legitimate evidence, yet the senate committee still schedules a hearing. Can you spot the problem with this hearing? Elizabeth Cox explores the burden of proof fallacy.
Lesson by Elizabeth Cox, directed by Pazit Cahlon and Hector Herrera.
- Video Language:
- English
- Team:
- closed TED
- Project:
- TED-Ed
- Duration:
- 04:06
lauren mcalpine approved English subtitles for Can you outsmart the fallacy that started a witch hunt? | ||
lauren mcalpine edited English subtitles for Can you outsmart the fallacy that started a witch hunt? | ||
lauren mcalpine accepted English subtitles for Can you outsmart the fallacy that started a witch hunt? | ||
lauren mcalpine edited English subtitles for Can you outsmart the fallacy that started a witch hunt? | ||
Tara Ahmadinejad edited English subtitles for Can you outsmart the fallacy that started a witch hunt? | ||
Tara Ahmadinejad edited English subtitles for Can you outsmart the fallacy that started a witch hunt? | ||
Tara Ahmadinejad edited English subtitles for Can you outsmart the fallacy that started a witch hunt? |