-
It's six o'clock in the morning,
-
pitch black outside.
-
My 14-year-old son
is fast asleep in his bed,
-
sleeping the reckless,
deep sleep of a teenager.
-
I flip on the light and physically shake
the poor boy awake,
-
because I know that,
-
like ripping off a Band-Aid,
-
it's better to get it over with quickly.
-
(Laughter)
-
I have a friend who yells "fire"
just to rouse her sleeping teen.
-
And another who got so fed up
-
that she had to dump cold water
on her son's head
-
just to get him out of bed.
-
Sound brutal ...
-
but perhaps familiar?
-
Every morning I ask myself,
-
"How can I --
-
knowing what I know,
-
and doing what I do for a living --
-
be doing this to my own son?"
-
You see,
-
I'm a sleep researcher.
-
(Laughter)
-
So I know far too much about sleep,
-
and the consequences of sleep loss.
-
I know that I'm depriving my son
of the sleep he desparately needs
-
as a rapidly growing teenager.
-
I also know that by waking him up
-
hours before his natural
biological clock tells him he's ready,
-
I'm literally robbing him
of his dreams --
-
the type of sleep most associated
with learning, memory consolidation
-
and emotional processing.
-
But it's not just my kid
that's being deprived of sleep.
-
Sleep deprivation among
American teenagers is an epidemic.
-
Only about one in 10 gets
the eight to 10 hours of sleep per night
-
recommended by sleep scientists
and pediatricians.
-
If you're thinking to yourself,
-
"Phew, we're doing good,
-
my kid's getting eight hours,"
-
remember,
-
eight hours is the minimum
recommendation ...
-
you're barely passing.
-
Eight hours is kind of like
getting a C on your report card.
-
There are many factors
contributing to this epidemic,
-
but a major factor preventing teens
from getting the sleep they need
-
is actually a matter of public policy.
-
Not hormones, social lives or Snapchat.
-
Across the country,
-
many schools are starting
around 7:30 a.m. or earlier,
-
despite the fact that major
medical organizations recommend
-
that middle and high school
start no earlier than 8:30 a.m.
-
These early start policies have
a direct effect on how much --
-
or really how little sleep
American teenagers are getting.
-
They're also pitting
teenagers and their parents
-
in a fundamentally unwinnable fight
against their own bodies.
-
Around the time of puberty,
-
teenagers experience a delay
in their biological clock,
-
which determines when we feel most awake
and when we feel most sleepy.
-
This is driven in part by a shift
in the release of the hormone melatonin.
-
Teenagers' bodies wait to start releasing
melatonin until around 11 p.m.,
-
which is two hours later than what
we see in adults or younger children.
-
This means that waking a teenager up
at 6 a.m. is the biological equivalent
-
of waking an adult up at 4 a.m.
-
On the unfortunate days when
I have to wake up at 4 a.m.,
-
I'm a zombie.
-
Functionally useless.
-
I can't think straight,
-
I'm irritable
-
and I probably shouldn't be driving a car,
-
but this is how many American
teenagers feel every single school day.
-
In fact, many of the --
-
shall we say,
-
unpleasant characteristics that we
chalk up to being a teenagers --
-
moodiness, irritability,
laziness, depression --
-
could be a product
of chronic sleep deprivation.
-
For many teens battling
chronic sleep loss,
-
their go-to strategy to compensate
is consuming large quantities of caffeine
-
in the form of venti frappucinnos,
-
or energy drinks and shots.
-
So essentially,
-
we've got an entire population
of tired but wired youth.
-
Advocates of sleep-friendly
start times know
-
that adolescence is a period
of dramatic brain development,
-
particularly in the parts of the brain
-
that are responsible for those higher
order thinking processes,
-
including reasoning, problem-solving
and good judgment.
-
In other words,
-
the very type of brain activity
that's responsible
-
for reining in those impulsive
and often risky behaviors
-
that are so characteristic of adolescence
-
and that are so terrifying
to us parents of teenagers.
-
They know that like the rest of us,
-
when teenagers don't
get the sleep they need,
-
their brains, their bodies
and behaviors suffer
-
with both immediate and lasting effects.
-
They can't concentrate,
-
their attention plummets
-
and many will even show
behavioral signs that mimic ADHD.
-
But the consequences of teen sleep loss
go well beyond the classroom,
-
sadly contributing to many
of the mental health problems
-
that skyrocket during adolescence,
-
including substance use,
-
depression and suicide.
-
In our work with teens
from LA Unified School District,
-
we found that teens with sleep problems
-
were 55 percent more likely
to have used alcohol in the past month.
-
In another study with over
30,000 high school students,
-
they found that for each
hour of lost sleep,
-
there was a 38 percent increase
in feeling sad or hopeless,
-
and a 58 percent increase
in teen suicide attempts.
-
And if that's not enough,
-
teens who skip out on sleep
are at increased risk
-
for a host of physical health problems
that plague our country,
-
including obesity,
heart disease and diabetes.
-
Then there's the risk of putting
a sleep-deprived teen,
-
with a newly minted driver's license,
-
behind the wheel.
-
Studies have shown that getting five hours
or less of sleep per night
-
is the equivalent of driving with a blood
alcohol content above the legal limit.
-
Advocates of sleep-friendly start times,
-
and researchers in this area,
-
have produced tremendous science
-
showing the tremendous benefits
of later start times.
-
The findings are unequivocal,
-
and as a sleep scientist,
-
I rarely get to speak
with that kind of certainty.
-
Teens from districts with later
start times get more sleep.
-
To the naysayers who may think
that if schools start later,
-
teens will just stay up later,
-
the truth is,
-
their bedtimes stay the same,
-
but their wake-up times get extended,
-
resulting in more sleep.
-
They're more likely to show up for school;
-
school absences dropped
by 25 percent in one district.
-
And they're less likely to dropout.
-
Not surprisingly, they do
better academically.
-
So this has real implications
for reducing the achievement gap.
-
Standardized test scores
in math and reading
-
go up by two to three percentage points.
-
That's as powerful as reducing class sizes
by one-third fewer students,
-
or replacing a so-so teacher
in the classroom
-
with a truly outstanding one.
-
Their mental and physical health improves,
-
and even their families are happier.
-
I mean, who wouldn't enjoy a little
more pleasantness from our teens,
-
and a little less crankiness?
-
Even their communities are safer
-
because car crash rates go down --
-
a 70 percent reduction in one district.
-
Given these tremendous benefits,
-
you might think,
-
well, this is a no-brainer, right?
-
So why have we as a society
failed to heed this call?
-
Often the argument against later
start times goes something like this:
-
"Why should we delay
start times for teenagers?
-
We need to toughen them up
so they're ready for the real world!"
-
But that's like saying to the parent
of a two-year-old,
-
"Don't let Johnny nap,
-
or he won't be ready for kindergarten."
-
(Laughter)
-
Delaying start times also presents
many logistical challenges.
-
Not just for students and their families,
-
but for communities as a whole.
-
Updating bus routes,
-
increased transportation costs,
-
impact on sports,
-
care before or after school.
-
These are the same concerns
that come up in district after district,
-
time and again around the country
-
as school start times are debated.
-
And they're legitimate concerns,
-
but these are problems
we have to work through.
-
They are not valid excuses
-
for failing to do the right thing
for our children,
-
which is to start middle and high schools
no earlier than 8:30 a.m.
-
And in districts around the country,
-
big and small,
-
who have made this change,
-
they found that these fears
are often unfounded,
-
and far outweighed by the tremendous
benefits for student health
-
and performance,
-
and our collective public safety.
-
So tomorrow morning,
-
when coincidentally we get to set
our clocks back by an hour --
-
(Laughter)
-
and you get that delicious
extra hour of sleep,
-
and they day seems a little longer,
-
and a little more full of hope,
-
think about the tremendous power of sleep.
-
And think about what a gift it would be
-
for our children to be able
to wake up naturally,
-
in harmony with their own biology.
-
Thank you,
-
and pleasant dreams.
Ming Lee
I had translated this here:http://amara.org/en/videos/lR5lVq2TwhlM/zh-tw/1874952/
,in Chinese, Traditional already, though it is waiting to be reviewed. It does not feel comfortable when I see this speech shown up here again. Like I was wasting my time. Same case happens with another speech with same speaker, different title just like this case here. Wonder why?
Would like to hear any translator's opinions about it. Should I stop translating with TEDx's talks? Or maybe those translator should consider my situation to avoid doing something stupid like me? Or did I miss something I didn't learn from TED? I mean being a translator, who would like to see your work being neglected like these experiences. Doesn't this mean any talk can be put up in TED by just changing it's title?
Any opinions or comments that would teach me to avoid this kind of wasting of contributor's time would be appreciated? I believe that it is not necessary to waste contributor's time with same talks, right?
Thanks.