-
♪ [music] ♪
-
- [Tyler] Real business-cycle theory
is about negative supply shocks.
-
That word "real" in the name --
-
don't contrast it
with the word "phony,"
-
but rather contrast it
with "monetary."
-
Real business cycles
are not about monetary policy --
-
mostly they're about
negative supply shocks.
-
Now, the nice thing
about real business-cycle theory
-
is that it actually explains
most business cycles
-
in the history of the human race.
-
Consider earlier economies
-
where, say, 80% of GDP
was agriculture.
-
What then could be
the negative shock?
-
Well, imagine a whole year
of bad rainfall,
-
and then a very bad harvest.
-
That would mean lower output
for almost all of the economy.
-
It would mean people
have less to eat.
-
It might even mean
more malnutrition,
-
and that would be
a very bad macroeconomic event.
-
That's just the simplest example
of real business-cycle theory.
-
Real business-cycle theory
needs to be modified
-
for more modern economies,
which are more diversified.
-
So, what would be an example?
-
Consider America in the year 1973.
-
What was the negative shock then?
-
A much higher price of oil.
-
OPEC, the oil-exporting cartel,
-
raised the price of its oil
to American buyers.
-
Now, oil is an input
into the production
-
of many goods and services --
-
like airplane trips,
-
or building automobiles,
-
or bathtub rubber duckies.
-
So, you have
higher production costs.
-
That means less will be produced,
-
probably fewer workers will be hired,
-
and, overall,
incomes will be lower.
-
Those initial negative shocks
-
will work their way
through the American economy,
-
and that will mean
successive negative shocks
-
for other parts of the economy
even if they don't use oil,
-
and that ends up
leading to a recession.
-
Real business-cycle theory
also can apply to the present day.
-
Consider the economy of Brazil,
-
where GDP has declined
by more than 5%
-
over the last two years.
-
What have been the negative shocks?
-
First -- falling commodity prices.
-
Brazil exports
a lot of commodities,
-
commodities
like soybeans, and cotton,
-
and coffee, and minerals.
-
Those commodities are bringing in
lower prices on world markets,
-
and that means lower incomes
for a lot of Brazilians.
-
Second -- bad policy.
-
The behavior
of the Brazilian government
-
has been erratic
and unpredictable,
-
and this has increased
the level of perceived risk
-
in the Brazilian economy.
-
So to graph a real business cycle,
what does that look like?
-
Well, in our basic aggregate demand--
aggregate supply model,
-
it's pretty simple.
-
The long-run aggregate supply curve
is shifting to the left,
-
and you can see that means
a lower level of output.
-
Over the medium term,
due to propagation,
-
it also may be that
the aggregate demand curve
-
shifts back and to the left,
-
and that, of course,
will make the problem worse.
-
But again, the fundamental event
-
is simply the shifting back
and to the left
-
of the aggregate supply curve.
-
So what are the solutions
when you have a problem
-
based in real business-cycle theory?
-
Well, first thing you can do
-
is try to avoid the problem
in the first place.
-
If the risk is having an oil price
which is too high,
-
try to have invested
in the first place
-
in some energy alternatives.
-
Second, ask yourself
what can you do
-
to make your economy
more flexible so it can adjust
-
to the negative supply shock
more quickly.
-
All of those responses
will help limit the costs
-
of having a negative
real-business cycle.
-
So, what are the problems
in real business-cycle theory?
-
There are at least two.
-
First -- It doesn't explain
all business cycles.
-
A lot of business cycles
do have to do
-
with monetary policy,
banking, and credit,
-
rather than the supply side
of the economy.
-
A second problem
with real business-cycle theory --
-
it's not always good on explaining
why unemployment is so high
-
over the course
of many business cycles.
-
If you imagine a negative shock
hitting the economy,
-
well, why don't workers
just take lower wages
-
and stay at work?
-
And to explain
those employment effects,
-
often we need to supplement
real business-cycle theory
-
with other accounts
of business cycles.
-
So, to sum up,
real business-cycle theory
-
is a really good theory
for many cases,
-
but it leaves many others
fundamentally unexplained.
-
- [Narrator] You're on your way
to mastering economics.
-
Make sure this video sticks
by taking a few practice questions.
-
Or, if you're ready
for more macroeconomics,
-
click for the next video.
-
Still here?
-
Check out Marginal Revolution
University's other popular videos.
-
♪ [music] ♪